us supreme court: 022007pzor

66
8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 1/66 (ORDER LIST: 549 U.S.) TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2007 CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS 05-296 GOMEZ, EDWIN, ET AL. V. TENNESSEE The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Middle Division for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007). 05-816 CLARK, ORLANDO C. V. CO DOC, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. ___ (2007). 05-874 BEY, LAMAR J. V. JOHNSON, KELLY, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. ___ (2007). 05-6698 BRADFORD, DAVID A. V. CALIFORNIA The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007). 1

Upload: supreme-court

Post on 31-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 1/66

(ORDER LIST: 549 U.S.)

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2007

CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

05-296 GOMEZ, EDWIN, ET AL. V. TENNESSEE

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The

judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme

Court of Tennessee, Middle Division for further consideration in

light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-816 CLARK, ORLANDO C. V. CO DOC, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The

judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further

consideration in light of Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-874 BEY, LAMAR J. V. JOHNSON, KELLY, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The

judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further

consideration in light of Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-6698 BRADFORD, DAVID A. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

1

Page 2: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 2/66

05-6793 BLACK, KEVIN M. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme

Court of California for further consideration in light of

Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-7111 PARRAS, JOHN B. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-7309 MAUGAOTEGA, MITI V. HAWAII

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme

Court of Hawaii for further consideration in light of Cunningham 

v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-7321 PICADO, MAURICIO V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-7325 JOHNSON, LOUIS D. V. MONROE, SANDRA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

2

Page 3: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 3/66

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further

consideration in light of Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-7675 SALDANA, SAMUEL V. CALIFORNIA

05-7721 SOTO, LOUIS M. V. CALIFORNIA

05-7809 HOWARD, ERIC L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-7878 CONYERS, JAMES V. MI DOC, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further

consideration in light of Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-8031 SAMPLE, GEORGE C. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U. S.

___ (2007).

05-8831 TARANGO, ARTURO V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

3

Page 4: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 4/66

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-8894 VAZQUEZ, JUAN M. V. RAGONESE, DAVID, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further

consideration in light of Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of

this petition.

05-8975 BLAY, DENNIS M. V. REILLY, JOHN, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further

consideration in light of Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-9004 FRAWLEY, DOUGLAS V. NEW MEXICO

05-9028 SANDOVAL, MARCELINO A. V. NEW MEXICO

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Supreme Court of New Mexico for further consideration in light

of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-9332 AUYON, BILLY J. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

4

Page 5: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 5/66

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-9335 BRANHAM, RODNEY V. McCONNELL, REX, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further

consideration in light of Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-9485 ELLIOT, JAMES E. V. CALIFORNIA

05-9549 QUINTANILLA, NICOLAS V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-9582 FREEMAN, STEPHEN V. NEW MEXICO

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme

Court of New Mexico for further consideration in light of

Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-9617 STROPE, MICHAEL L. V. McKUNE, WARDEN, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

5

Page 6: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 6/66

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further

consideration in light of Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-9724 RAMIREZ, JOSEPH J. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-9786 TEWOLDE, SAMUEL F. V. CALIFORNIA

05-9798 GOMEZ-RODRIGUEZ, ALFREDO V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-9803 MARIN, OSCAR V. CALIFORNIA

05-9818 BORDERS, GARRET V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-9831 HUGHES, ROBERT S. V. CALIFORNIA

6

Page 7: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 7/66

05-9843 SHEA, PAUL E. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-9865 HERNANDEZ, LEONEL V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-9876 CROTEAU, JOHN R. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One

for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U. S. ___ (2007).

05-9897 WILSON, DARRYEAL W. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

7

Page 8: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 8/66

05-9901 ) COX, DONALD D. V. CALIFORNIA)

05-10165 ) COX, DIANA L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court

of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-9943 POWELL, GREGORY A. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-9951 AGUILAR, RAUL V. CALIFORNIA

05-9964 HICKS, DAVID V. CALIFORNIA

05-9981 DAVIE, TODD V. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10011 JONES, RAYMOND V. CALIFORNIA

05-10015 DELAHOUSSAYE, ERIC J. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

8

Page 9: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 9/66

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10053 DUNCAN, JOHN R. V. TENNESSEE

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10072 DOWNER, COLLIE G. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10091 PANG, KENNETH L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10113 HERNANDEZ, MANUEL J. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

9

Page 10: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 10/66

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10124 SPRANKLE, LARRY J. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10183 CARRILLO, JOSHUA V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10189 LEIGHTON, MICHAEL A. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10193 TORRES, RODNEY C. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

10

Page 11: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 11/66

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10214 KING, JONATHAN V. NEW MEXICO

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeals of New Mexico for further consideration in light of

Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10215 JONES, JEREMY V. CALIFORNIA

05-10236 WHITE, KEITH L. V. CALIFORNIA

05-10246 ROSAS, RICARDO V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10247 RALBOVSKY, TIMOTHY P. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme

Court of California for further consideration in light of

Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10255 LU, ERICA V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

11

Page 12: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 12/66

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10256 KING, MARK F. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10272 HOLGUIN, OSCAR D. V. CALIFORNIA

05-10278 THOMAS, CORA L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10299 MAGANA, JORGE V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10311 VELASQUEZ, CESAR V. CALIFORNIA

05-10355 JONES, HOLLIE V. CALIFORNIA

12

Page 13: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 13/66

05-10362 SMITH, KENNETH V. CALIFORNIA

05-10385 GUTIERREZ, JUAN C. V. CALIFORNIA

05-10400 MARCHAND, KEITH R. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10401 PRUITT, LANCE D. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two

for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10408 OWENS, DERRICK D. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10428 ALASHANTI, MARQUIS I. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three

13

Page 14: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 14/66

for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10429 ALLEN, CURTIS V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10435 BLACKWELL, RODNEY K. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10442 CZUB, JOHN V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U. S.

___ (2007).

05-10462 ) SANDERS, WANDA V. CALIFORNIA)

05-10788 ) MOORE, THOMAS V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the cases are remanded to the Court

14

Page 15: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 15/66

of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10466 ROBLES, ROGELIO G. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10477 BRUMBAUGH, SCOTT B. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10485 SHEARER, MALCOLM L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One

for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10545 LOWRY, CARL A. V. CALIFORNIA

05-10565 ANDREAS, NICOLAS D. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

15

Page 16: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 16/66

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10588 YANG, TENG V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U. S.

___ (2007).

05-10589 WATSON, COY V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10609 TURNER, CHARLES E. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10612 SMITH, JAMIE V. CALIFORNIA

05-10642 PERRY, JASON A. V. CALIFORNIA

05-10690 ) PHILLIPS, WYLIE V. CALIFORNIA

16

Page 17: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 17/66

)05-11104 ) NASH, EDDIE L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10742 SINDORF, KURT E. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10775 HUGHES, RANDY L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-10776 HILL, EDDIE L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

17

Page 18: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 18/66

___ (2007).

05-10793 BALL, BOBBY D. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three

for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10802 CASTRO, RONAL A. V. CALIFORNIA

05-10830 MATAMOROS, JOSE V. CALIFORNIA

05-10894 ELAM, KAU A. V. CALIFORNIA

05-10907 FETISSOVA, RIMMA V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-10984 WHEELER, CHRISTINA L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11002 ACOSTA, JESUS X. V. CALIFORNIA

05-11004 MEDINA, OSCAR V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

18

Page 19: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 19/66

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-11018 ORTEGA, ARMONDO G. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11045 KING, TRAMAINE V. CALIFORNIA

05-11089 TAYLOR, KEON V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-11123 YNCLAN, GINO R. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

19

Page 20: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 20/66

05-11141 LEARN, EDWARD L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11145 ALLEN, JOSEPH A. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11149 VASQUEZ, FERNANDO V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One

for further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-11192 LEE, NATHAN V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

20

Page 21: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 21/66

05-11203 MORRIS, KEVIN L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11204 CENICEROS, JOHANNA V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U. S.

___ (2007).

05-11223 SPEARS, HAMISI X. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11241 BANNER, LAWRENCE V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

21

Page 22: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 22/66

05-11243 PAYTON, ISAIAH I. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11269 BROWN, JERMAINE V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11321 HAMILTON, ANTHONY V. CALIFORNIA

05-11323 LEON, GEORGE V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-11327 MARTINEZ, NICHOLAS J. V. CALIFORNIA

05-11493 HOLZHAUSER, CHAD V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for

22

Page 23: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 23/66

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-11503 GALICIA, SATURNINO V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11522 GORE, JOSEPH K. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11569 ARRIAGA, ROBERT M. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11610 BALLINGER, MICHAEL P. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

23

Page 24: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 24/66

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11618 WILLIAMS, TERYL A. V. CALIFORNIA

05-11639 MAYZES, MIGUEL V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

05-11708 LIDDELL, DAVID S. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11712 PARTIN, COURTNEY V. TENNESSEE

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11736 FULLER, GUY G. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

24

Page 25: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 25/66

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11765 MAYO, JEROME V. TENNESSEE

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

05-11768 PEREZ, MARIO V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-396 KNOWLES, WARDEN V. MIRZAYANCE, ALEXANDRE

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The

judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further

consideration in light of Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. ___

(2006).

06-5050 SMITH, CHARLES T. V. CALIFORNIA

06-5053 BELL, MICHAEL X. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

25

Page 26: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 26/66

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-5287 McELROY, WILLIAM E. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-5292 CLARK, KAVRON V. CALIFORNIA

06-5308 ARZATE, MANUAL A. V. CALIFORNIA

06-5309 WHEELER, CHRISTOPHER V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-5332 MURPHY, TASAUNA D. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-5414 BARRAGAN, JOSE L. V. CALIFORNIA

26

Page 27: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 27/66

06-5442 VIDEGAIN, GREGG T. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-5500 FROEMEL, ROCKY D. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-5586 LOPEZ, CARLOS M. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-5629 KENNER, JAMES E. V. BELL, WARDEN

06-5690 MEEKS, BILLY M. V. BELL, WARDEN

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

27

Page 28: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 28/66

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-5691 BOYD, PATRICK V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-5757 MUSHARBASH, JOSEPH V. CALIFORNIA

06-5763 SEPULVEDA, FAUSTO L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-5989 LIGGION, JAQUAY V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-5990 RITCHIE, JUSTIN V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

28

Page 29: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 29/66

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-6027 TU, VINCENT V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-6292 RODRIGUEZ, MANUEL V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U. S.

___ (2007).

06-6381 BOUNDS, JAMES V. NEW MEXICO

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme

Court of New Mexico for further consideration in light of

Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-6420 WILLIAMS, ANTHONY L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

29

Page 30: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 30/66

___ (2007).

06-6428 ALAMOUTI, MEHDI D. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-6468 McCULLER, RAYMOND A. V. MICHIGAN

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme

Court of Michigan for further consideration in light of

Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-6620 BARNES, PAUL S. V. CALIFORNIA

06-6655 GARCIA, ARTURO V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-6660 GUEVARA, RICARDO V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. ___

30

Page 31: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 31/66

(2006).

06-6703 BOCHICCHIO, BILL V. CALIFORNIA

06-6760 MYERS, SHAWN V. CALIFORNIA

06-6786 LOPEZ, JUAN F. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-6790 GUARTOS, BRYANT V. TENNESSEE

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-6892 SOLORIO, EMILIANO G. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme

Court of California for further consideration in light of

Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-6992 NAYA, HORACIO V. CALIFORNIA

06-7026 OLSON, SLAVA K. V. CALIFORNIA

06-7038 SWAIN, TYRONE V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

31

Page 32: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 32/66

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-7105 CHEEKS, BETTY A. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-7112 SIMENTAL, RAY T. V. CALIFORNIA

06-7150 ESPINOZA, JERRY L. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-7193 LANDCHO, RICARDO M. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-7233 HUGHES, JOSEPH E. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

32

Page 33: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 33/66

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-7301 ERVIN, VANCE R. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-7320 DUARTE, RAUL V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-7361 FERREIRA, ANTHONY V. McDONOUGH, SEC., FL DOC, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further

consideration in light of Burton v. Stewart , 549 U. S. ___

(2007) (per curiam ).

06-7431 BAUTISTA, JUAN G. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

33

Page 34: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 34/66

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-7453 HYLTON, JONATHAN R. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-7624 HARMON, GEORGE B. V. CALIFORNIA

06-7639 BAILEY, DORIAN D. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-7739 RAMIREZ, MARTA V. CALIFORNIA

06-7743 SENEGEL, JOSEPH E. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

34

Page 35: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 35/66

06-7766 REED, JACKIE R. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-7796 YATES, SHON J. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-7871 OCHOA-PEREZ, FILIBERTO V. UNITED STATES

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further

consideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. ___

(2006).

06-7977 SIQUEIROS, CLETO V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

35

Page 36: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 36/66

06-8101 MANUEL, TRAVIS V. CALIFORNIA

06-8145 CALIXIO, PEDRO R. V. CALIFORNIA

06-8187 LaFAVOR, DOYLE L. V. CALIFORNIA

06-8194 SALINAS, LIBRADO V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-8208 JONES, LEONARD C. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, First Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-8224 RODRIGUEZ, JOSHUA V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

06-8373 GONZALEZ, PETER S. V. CALIFORNIA

06-8380 MILLS, ANDY V. CALIFORNIA

06-8394 LEE, CHARLES J. V. CALIFORNIA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

36

Page 37: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 37/66

pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the

Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for

further consideration in light of Cunningham v. California,

549 U.S. ___ (2007).

06-8425 RISTAU, STEVEN A. V. CALIFORNIA

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District for further

consideration in light of Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S.

___ (2007).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

06A498 CUNNINGHAM, RICK V. UNITED STATES

The application for a certificate of appealability addressed

to Justice Souter and referred to the Court is denied.

06A619(06-875) RODRIGUEZ, ISIDORO V. PEREIRA, DANILO, D. ET AL.

The application for stay addressed to Justice Stevens

and referred to the Court is denied.

06A715(06-875)

RODRIGUEZ, ISIDORO V. PEREIRA, DANILO D. ET AL.

The application for preliminary injunction addressed to

Justice Stevens and referred to the Court is denied.

06M59 RAMIREZ, RICHARD V. CALIFORNIA

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an

affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner is granted.

06M60 M. S. V. I. P., ET AL.

06M61 FRANCIS, HELEN V. BLAIKIE GROUP

37

Page 38: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 38/66

06M62 DICKSON, RYAN H. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs

of certiorari out of time are denied.

06M63 GRAY, DERRICK V. UNITED STATES

The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of

certiorari under seal is denied.

06M64 PATTERSON, BARRY N. V. SCHRIRO, DIR., AZ DOC, ET AL.

06M65 GLEAN, MICHAEL V. UNIV. OF GA, ET AL.

The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs

of certiorari out of time are denied.

132, ORIG. ALABAMA, ET AL. V. NORTH CAROLINA

The motion of the Special Master for allowance of fees and

reimbursement is granted, and the Special Master is awarded a

total of $75,272.38 for the period November 17, 2003, through

October 31, 2006, to be paid equally by the parties.

05-1157 CREDIT SUISSE SEC. (USA), ET AL. V. BILLING, GLEN, ET AL.

The motion of Securities Industry and Financial Markets

Association, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is

granted. The motion of Washington Legal Foundation for leave to

file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of

National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. for leave to

file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of NYSE

Group, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is

granted. The motion of W.R. Hambrecht + Co., LLC for leave to

file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The Chief Justice

took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

06-405 RAY, JAMES V. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.

The respondent is invited to file a response to the petition

38

Page 39: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 39/66

for rehearing within thirty days.

06-415 SELIG, JOHN, ET AL. V. PEDIATRIC SPECIALTY CARE, ET AL.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this

case expressing the views of the United States.

06-8662 IN RE JOHNNY SWANSON

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 13,

2007, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule

38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of

the Rules of this Court.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

06-766 NY BD. OF ELECTIONS, ET AL. V. TORRES, MARGARITA L., ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

06-6911 LOGAN, JAMES D. V. UNITED STATES

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

CERTIORARI DENIED

05-107 DAVIS, WARREN V. INT'L UNION, UNITED AUTO, ETC.

05-878 HERRERA, STEVE, ET AL. V. LIRA, ERNESTO G.

05-6549 DIAZ, RICHARD V. CALIFORNIA

05-8134 HARLESS, ROBERT R. V. CALIFORNIA

05-8991 ACKERMAN, JOSEPH W. V. CALIFORNIA

05-10181 CHAVEZ, MICHAEL R. V. CALIFORNIA

05-10263 SEEVERS, RICHARD E. V. CALIFORNIA

05-10553 SILVAS, CHILO D. V. CALIFORNIA

05-10645 CONERLY, DAVID V. CALIFORNIA

05-11622 SWANSON, JOHNNY V. UNITED STATES

05-11685 YOUNG, DARRYL D. V. 7-ELEVEN, INC.

39

Page 40: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 40/66

06-271 SKOROS, ANDREA V. NEW YORK, NY, ET AL.

06-338 LACAVERA, CATHERINE V. DUDAS, UNDER SEC. OF COMMERCE

06-384 BUSTAMANTE-BARRERA, JAVIER O. V. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN.

06-419 PEDIATRIC SPECIALTY CARE, INC. V. AR DEPT. OF HUMAN SVS., ET AL.

06-478 DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY V. UNITED STATES

06-482 HONEYVILLE GRAIN, INC. V. NLRB

06-492 CURRY COUNTY, OR, ET AL. V. DARK, ROBERT

06-518 CHADDA, SOLANGE V. GILLESPIE, ED, ET AL.

06-543 IL PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS V. IL COMMERCE COMMISSION

06-576 JES PROPERTIES, INC., ET AL. V. USA EQUESTRIAN TRUST, ET AL.

06-577 SCHOR, GARY V. ABBOTT LABORATORIES

06-596 FIEGER, GEOFFREY N. V. MI GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR

06-619 BACCARAT FREMONT DEVELOPERS, LLC V. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

06-633 ) PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ET AL. V. MINNESOTA)

06-805 ) COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT TOBACCO V. PHILIP MORRIS USA, ET AL.

06-651 MELLEY, ELIZABETH, ET AL. V. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD

06-658 McCARRAN INT'L AIRPORT, ET AL. V. SISOLAK, STEVE

06-659 COLTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. V. UNITED STATES

06-663 TELKOM SA LTD. V. TELCORDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

06-667 MALDONADO, JUSTINE V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

06-670 WILLIS, JANICE F. V. GAO

06-674 BRADFISCH, DONALD, ET AL. V. TEMPLETON FUNDS, INC., ET AL.

06-676 OKWEDY, KRISTOPHER, ET AL. V. MOLINARI, GUY, ET AL.

06-692 GONZALEZ-VERA, LAURA, ET AL. V. KISSINGER, HENRY, ET AL.

06-719 BENDER, KENNETH, ET AL. V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

06-724 McCARTHY, CHARLES C. V. SUPREME COURT OF CA, ET AL.

06-737 ESTATE OF LESLIE H. CLEM, ET AL. V. WESTERN HERITAGE INS. COM.

06-738 BISHOP, WINFORD K. V. USCA 5

40

Page 41: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 41/66

06-742 ROMANELLI, CARL V. BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL.

06-748 LIVELY, EMMA C. V. WILD OATS MARKETS, INC.

06-751 ROBERTS, DONALD V. KEMNA, SUPT., ET AL.

06-752 ESTATES IN EAGLE RIDGE, ET AL. V. VALLEY BANK AND TRUST

06-753 SCHNEIDER, BARBARA V. KIRWAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

06-755 WARREN, KATHLEEN V. VOLUSIA COUNTY, FL

06-756 DIFFENDAL, STEVEN V. MARYLAND

06-758 LYNCH, CLARENCE J. V. JOHNSON, DIR., VA DOC

06-762 ESTATE OF TARIK K. RODGERS V. SMITH, STEVE, ET AL.

06-763 IL CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. V. McDANIEL, MILTON

06-768 MOUNT PLEASANT, NY V. LEGION OF CHRIST, INC.

06-772 SUDAN V. RUX, OLIVIA, ET AL.

06-776 WEBER, JAMES E. V. IA BANK AND TRUST CO, ET AL.

06-777 A. F., ET AL. V. TEXAS

06-780 DAVIS, DARRYL G. V. GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY

06-781 HENDRIX, SARAH E. V. PAULSON, SEC. OF TREASURY

06-783 HOBBS, LAWRENCE, ET AL. V. USDC AZ, ET AL.

06-786 LOCKLEAR, AARON V. BERGMAN & BEVING AB, ET AL.

06-787 PROTECT MARRIAGE IL, ET AL. V. ORR, DAVID D., ET AL.

06-788 IBAR, PABLO V. FLORIDA

06-790 LINCOLN LOAN COMPANY V. PORTLAND, OR, ET AL.

06-791 WHITE HAT MANAGEMENT, LLC V. BLOUNT-HILL, BEVERLY, ET AL.

06-796 RATTNER, SHERMAN, ET AL. V. BOULDER CITY, NV, ET AL.

06-798 THERESA, DOMINICK V. FETKY, WILLIAM M.

06-803 DAMON, JOHN V. AIR PACIFIC LTD., ET AL.

06-804 CAMAN, GUY V. CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.

06-811 PARKINSON, RONALD W. V. SOMERFORD CORP., ET AL.

06-812 SIMMONS, ERIC V. FLORIDA

41

Page 42: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 42/66

06-816 BARCLAY, JOHN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

06-820 DUBIN, GARY V. V. REAL, MANUEL L., ET AL.

06-822 KOCHERT, CAROLYN G. V. GREATER LAFAYETTE HEALTH, ET AL.

06-823 TAL, MOSHE, ET AL. V. HOGAN, DAN R., ET AL.

06-824 WAGGONER, J. VIRGIL, ET AL. V. SUISSE SECURITY BANK AND TRUST

06-825 BANKS, STARLETTA L. V. GRANHOLM, GOV. OF MI, ET AL.

06-826 BRUH, MARC V. BESSEMER VENTURE PARTNERS

06-832 CASTRO, RAMON E., ET AL. V. PUERTO RICO HIGHWAY & TRANS.

06-833 SITOMER, DAVID J., ET AL. V. KING, CHIEF JUDGE, ETC., ET AL.

06-834 SONTAG, FRANK J. V. USDC WD PA

06-835 TAYLOR, LAUREEN B. V. DEPARTMENT OF VA

06-838 ORTIZ-NAVA, ESTELA V. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN.

06-840 ADAMS, SHERLAN V. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN.

06-841 DAVIS, ANNETTE V. NICHOLSON, SEC. OF VA

06-845 M2 SOFTWARE, INC. V. MADACY ENTERTAINMENT, ET AL.

06-847 MORRIS, MERRY V. WROBLE, JUDGE, ETC., ET AL.

06-848 CIGARETTES CHEAPER! V. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO, ET AL.

06-851 JIANG, MINHUA V. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN.

06-852 KERI, GABE V. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIV.

06-855 THOMAS, JACK V. HASSLER, JOHN, ET AL.

06-860 STEARMAN, WILLIAM C. V. SMITH, JERRY E., ET AL.

06-862 AREVALOS-ALFARO, HERMINIA V. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN.

06-864 ISLAM, RABIUL V. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN.

06-872 WIGGINS, AQUIL K. V. VA DOC

06-874 BLUE, BETTY J. V. DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY, ET AL.

06-879 RITCHIE, WAYNE V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.

06-883 DOMINGUEZ, ERLINDA V. BARNEDO, JUNIE, ET VIR

06-884 CHATMAN, MICHAEL V. ILLINOIS

42

Page 43: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 43/66

06-885 BLACKWELL, ROGER D. V. UNITED STATES

06-890 MTA NY CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY V. REITER, JOHN

06-904 LEE, DAVID J. V. INDIANA

06-905 MAHER, JEROME, ET AL. V. FDIC

06-908 DuMARCE, COLLEEN R., ET AL. V. KEMPTHORNE, SEC. OF INTERIOR

06-910 COX, SHARON S. V. GATES, SEC. OF DEFENSE

06-919 RANTZ, GEOFFREY D. V. COLORADO

06-925 VERBAL, ROBERT A. V. NORTH CAROLINA

06-930 RASHID, HAROON V. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN.

06-932 BUTLER, JERRY, ET AL. V. NY TEAMSTERS CONFERENCE

06-940 BRUNETTI, ANTHONY N. V. CONNECTICUT

06-941 STRYKER CORP., ET AL. V. PIONEER LABORATORIES, INC.

06-942 WAKSAL, SAMUEL V. UNITED STATES

06-947 LATTERA, GEORGE, ET UX. V. CIR

06-950 ) BEGUIRISTAIN, ARTURO, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES)

06-968 ) AGUERO, JESUS, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES)

06-991 ) GARCIA, JORGE, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

06-964 LOVETT, JOSHUA P. V. UNITED STATES

06-974 ABRAMOV, YECHIEL V. CHANDLER, WARDEN

06-979 RAMIREZ, LOUIS V. UNITED STATES

06-980 COIL, JOHN K. V. UNITED STATES

06-5369 MARION, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES

06-6112 YOUNG, JOHN V. ILLINOIS

06-6439 MARR, FLOYD W. V. WASHINGTON

06-6549 PATTON, CARL A. V. UNITED STATES

06-6593 RIGDON, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES

06-6678 GARRISON, LAMONT H. V. UNITED STATES

06-6687 ANGLIN, ERNEST W. V. UNITED STATES

43

Page 44: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 44/66

06-6916 FUSTER-ESCALONA, FRANCISCO V. McDONOUGH, SEC., FL DOC

06-6988 AGUIAR, PEDRO V. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN.

06-7033 LEE, KAREEM D. V. UNITED STATES

06-7058 WILLIAMS, JAMES T. V. PENNSYLVANIA

06-7072 CRAMER, JUSTIN C. V. CALIFORNIA

06-7099 GIORDANO, PHILIP A. V. UNITED STATES

06-7183 KRAUSE, KEITH V. WASHINGTON

06-7239 HALL, DERICK V. UNITED STATES

06-7331 BELL, ADRIAN V. UNITED STATES

06-7356 ALEX, RICKY J. V. STALDER, SEC., LA DOC

06-7367 ) FREGOSO, ANTHONY V. CALIFORNIA)

06-7773 ) VASQUEZ, ANDREW V. CALIFORNIA

06-7397 CHRISTIAN, DAVID P. V. UNITED STATES

06-7450 GALLUCCI, WILLIAM V. CHAO, SEC. OF LABOR

06-7454 GOODWIN, PAUL T. V. MISSOURI

06-7577 BOWEN, GREGORY A. V. OREGON

06-7594 SQUETIMKIN, STANLEY V. UNITED STATES

06-7606 BROOKS, NEILA J. V. SUPERVALU, INC.

06-7633 CHARLES, RONALD A. V. UNITED STATES

06-7681 KNIGHT, PATRICK B. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-7710 RODRIGUEZ-PRECIADO, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES

06-7738 ROBERSON, KURT V. UNITED STATES

06-7832 GUERRA, DENNIS O. V. UNITED STATES

06-7858 WHITE, MAXWELL D. V. HOUK, WARDEN

06-7899 TURLEY, MARY G. V. SCI OF ALABAMA

06-7911 ELROD, DOUGLAS V. JAMROG, WARDEN

06-7912 DYKAS, KENNETH P. V. MORGAN, WARDEN

06-7914 COLLINS, MARK R. V. OKLAHOMA, ET AL.

44

Page 45: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 45/66

06-7915 DELACERDA, VICTOR H. V. SCHWARTZ, WARDEN

06-7937 ANTHONY, JAMES L. V. McDONOUGH, SEC., FL DOC

06-7938 BALL, ANTWANN V. GEORGIA

06-7942 E. B. V. T. J., ET AL.

06-7945 STRONG, JAMES L. V. PENNSYLVANIA

06-7950 HARVEY, MICHAEL V. WACKENHUT CORP., ET AL.

06-7952 FLUELLEN, JERRIE K. V. FENSTERSHEIB & FOX, ET AL.

06-7956 HAWKINS, SIDNEY V. PERLMAN, SUPT., MID-STATE

06-7959 GUERRA, GLORIA V. ALAMEDA COUNTY, CA, ET AL.

06-7962 DUBOIS, JOHN G. V. ASSOC. OF APARTMENT OWNERS

06-7964 ELIAS, ALLAN V. DOMINGUEZ, SCOTT K., ET AL.

06-7967 BROWN, QUINSHELA V. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTH. RETIREMENT

06-7969 TOWARD, JAMES H. V. FLORIDA

06-7973 POINTDUJOUR, MARIE C. V. MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL, ET AL.

06-7974 PINEDA, CHARLES D. V. NUGENT, ROBERT

06-7979 SWEARINGEN, LARRY R. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TDCJ

06-7985 ANDERSON, RICHARD H. V. McDONOUGH, SEC., FL DOC

06-7993 MILLS, THOMAS V. HULICK, WARDEN

06-7996 MALHOTRA, SANJEEV V. WATERGATE AT LANDMARK CONDO.

06-8000 LEWIS, MANN V. ELLIOT, BILL, ET AL.

06-8002 JACKSON, TONY D. V. MINNESOTA

06-8004 JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER S. V. WA DOC, ET AL.

06-8005 JENNINGS, FLOYD V. MICHIGAN

06-8007 WALKER, CHAUNCEY L. V. JOHNSON, DIR., VA DOC

06-8011 KERSEY, GEORGE E. V. DCCA

06-8013 PHILLIPS, CHARLES T. V. JONES, WARDEN, ET AL.

06-8015 ROSE, WARREN D. V. MAYBERG, STEPHEN

06-8016 STEWART, CARL V. UNITED STATES

45

Page 46: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 46/66

06-8017 SMYRE, LEROY J. V. JOHNSON, DIR., VA DOC

06-8019 BANGA, KAMLESH V. WORLD SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSN.

06-8021 AMAN, CATHY L. V. JOHNSTON, CHRISTOPHER J.

06-8031 HAND, GERALD R. V. OHIO

06-8032 YOUNGER, CASSANDRA V. MISSISSIPPI

06-8035 BENNETT, NICHOLAS C. V. MAINE

06-8039 BEATY, DONALD E. V. ARIZONA

06-8040 BROWN, WILLIE A. V. JOHNSON, DIR., VA DOC, ET AL.

06-8042 SOTELO, ERNIE K. V. CALIFORNIA

06-8045 MUWWAKKIL, KAMAL V. VIRGINIA

06-8047 WHITE, LAWRENCE V. BATTAGLIA, WARDEN

06-8050 SLAKMAN, BARRY S. V. GEORGIA

06-8052 LUTHER, WILLIAM C. V. OHIO

06-8056 JOHNSON, LEROY V. WILSON, WARDEN

06-8057 MARTIN, MICHAEL L. V. NEW JERSEY

06-8062 HERNANDEZ, JOEL V. UNITED STATES

06-8063 YON S. GROEBNER V. MINNESOTA, ET AL.

06-8066 ELIAS, ALLAN V. DOMINGUEZ, SCOTT, ET AL.

06-8071 THOMAS, MICHAEL L. V. OKLAHOMA

06-8072 CHANDLER, GEORGE R. V. TILTON, SEC., CA DOC

06-8073 DORSEY, PAUL E. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-8080 ENRIQUEZ, JUAN V. TEXAS

06-8081 CRUTCHFIELD, STEVEN M. V. ILLINOIS

06-8082 CRAWFORD, KEESHAWN V. GRACE, SUPT., HUNTINGDON, ET AL.

06-8083 DANIEL, RICKY R. V. U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, ET AL.

06-8087 MOORE, LONNIE E. V. 19TH HOLE RESTAURANT

06-8092 FRANKLIN, EDWARD C. V. KS DOC, ET AL.

06-8094 HENDERSON, MICHAEL P. V. MINNESOTA

46

Page 47: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 47/66

06-8100 KANDEKORE, LIJYASU M. V. USDC ED NY

06-8103 DICUS, GREGORY V. CHANOS, ATT'Y GEN. OF NV, ET AL.

06-8112 CABALLERO, PATRICIA V. COURT OF APPEALS OF TX

06-8115 BONGA, JEFFREY V. RENICO, WARDEN

06-8116 BARODI, AHMAD M. V. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN.

06-8121 BURTON, TROY S. V. UNITED STATES

06-8126 STALEY, EDWARD V. HALL, WARDEN

06-8128 CLARK, HERMAN T. V. WORKMAN, WARDEN, ET AL.

06-8131 FOSTER, ROGER J. V. MINNESOTA

06-8133 FRANKLIN, BOBBY L. V. WELSH, BLAINE, ET AL.

06-8134 FARROW, EDDIE L. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-8135 HANSEN, RICHARD O. V. VAMPOLA, KENNETH, ET AL.

06-8137 FABELA, CECILIO P. V. WARD, WARDEN

06-8138 HUGHES, MICHAEL D. V. CARLTON, WARDEN

06-8139 HIPSHER, FLOYD V. WALLACE, WARDEN

06-8141 GARCIA, JESUS R. V. BIRKETT, WARDEN

06-8144 CULBERT, JIMMY V. PENNINGTON, RICHARD, ET AL.

06-8151 PALERMO, THOMAS V. MILLER, RICKY, ET AL.

06-8154 CAREY, WILLIAM T. V. TEXAS

06-8155 CLINE, DANNY R. V. TX BD. OF CRIM. JUSTICE, ET AL.

06-8159 RIVERA, JOSE C. V. USDC CD CA

06-8163 BROWN, JAMES G. V. CARROLL, WARDEN, ET AL.

06-8167 TROSTLE, TROY T. V. AVERY, R. CRAIG

06-8170 LEGER, DONALD L. V. LOUISIANA

06-8171 FOSTER, JAMES R. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-8173 THOMAS, WOODVENS V. DEPT. OF HOMELAND SEC.

06-8180 DEAN, REGINALD V. RUSSELL, JUDGE, ETC.

06-8181 QUAGLIANI, HENRY V. CATHEL, ADM'R, NJ

47

Page 48: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 48/66

06-8183 HOBBS, LARRY J. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-8184 GROCE, CAROLYN V. POWELL, EARL A., ET AL.

06-8185 MOORE, KATHERINE B. V. CEASE, JOHN H., ET AL.

06-8189 LYNCH, DONALD C. V. WEBB, PATTI

06-8196 PREBLE, JAYSON A. V. ESTEP, WARDEN

06-8197 McKINNON, MAURICE V. BECK, SEC., NC DOC

06-8198 SMITH, FREE O. V. CALIFORNIA

06-8205 WHITE, JEROME V. BURGESS, WARDEN

06-8210 LEWIS, DOROTHY V. KS DEPT. OF REVENUE, ET AL.

06-8211 DEMETRULIAS, GREGORY S. V. CALIFORNIA

06-8223 MARTINEZ-RIOS, FLORENTINO V. UNITED STATES

06-8227 SHEPPARD, DAVID V. DiGUGLIELMO, SUPT., GRATERFORD

06-8229 POWELL, STEVEN A. V. MARYLAND

06-8230 JONES, SAMUEL V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-8233 GISSENDANNER, EMANUEL A. V. ALABAMA

06-8251 KOZUH, ANTHONY V. NICHOLS, RN, ET AL.

06-8252 POPE, HENRY F. V. KERNAN, ACTING WARDEN

06-8255 OWENS, GLEN K. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-8263 NIGL, PAUL M. V. KINGSTON, WARDEN

06-8264 McKINNEY, CLINTON E. V. APPELLATE COURT OF IL

06-8269 POE, JAMES E. V. J E P ENTERPRISES, LP, ET AL.

06-8274 ENGESSER, OAKLEY B. V. DOOLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.

06-8275 JACKSON, DARRYL D. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-8281 PITTS, BRIAN V. FL DEPT. CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

06-8282 MARTINI, JOHN V. NEW JERSEY

06-8283 JACKSON, DAVID V. JACKSON, VERA

06-8286 McGOWAN, JOHNNY V. TN DOC

06-8291 SCOTT, DANIEL V. WYNDER, SUPT., DALLAS, ET AL.

48

Page 49: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 49/66

06-8292 WILLIAMS, WILLIAM D. V. BEDINFIELD, BILL, ET AL.

06-8294 McNEW, JOHN V. LEMON, GLEN, ET AL.

06-8296 ADDAMS-MORE, MARTI V. GILL, T. S., ET AL.

06-8297 ANDERSON, TERRANCE V. MISSOURI

06-8298 BEARD, NANCY V. DOMINGUEZ, P. R.

06-8300 BAK, ITZHAK V. BAK, JOYCE

06-8301 McGRATH, JAMES G. V. GEORGIA

06-8303 NEAL, ANGELA M. V. PINELLAS SHERIFF'S OFF., ET AL.

06-8307 MAKAS, TIMOTHY V. BENNETT, RICHARD, ET AL.

06-8310 WEST, JESS P. V. ADAMS, WARDEN, ET AL.

06-8315 BURDEN, SHANE V. HEMPELMAN, C., ET AL.

06-8316 BOZEMAN, KENNETH V. KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

06-8317 BACKMAN, PRINCE V. NEW YORK

06-8319 BROWN, RICHARD W. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-8320 ROBERSON, KEENAN V. ADAMS, WARDEN

06-8321 SANCHEZ, ELVA V. ILLINOIS

06-8325 GARCIA, DANIEL D. V. TEXAS

06-8326 HENSON, JOSEPH M. V. BROWN, RICHARD

06-8330 GLOVER, RICARDO V. McCAUGHTRY, WARDEN

06-8333 DAVIS, JOSEPH V. BILOXI PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT

06-8335 DAVIS, CHARLES T. V. RUNNELS, WARDEN, ET AL.

06-8339 MONTGOMERY-BROOKS, GEORGIANA V. REG. TRANSP. DIST., ET AL.

06-8340 MAGLIO, DANIEL V. FLORIDA

06-8342 SMITH, CLYDE G. V. FICCO, EDWARD

06-8343 JACKSON, MARK C. V. GRIMES, JERALD, ET AL.

06-8349 BASKETT, RONALD L. V. BOVENKAMP, KEVIN

06-8352 LUNINI, JOSEPH A. V. GRAYEB, CHARLES V., ET AL.

06-8353 LESTER, GARTH V. WEST VIRGINIA

49

Page 50: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 50/66

06-8355 ALEMAN, GEORGE V. TEXAS

06-8361 HAGGERTY, TRACY V. WEST VIRGINIA

06-8363 HOWARD, CONNELL V. McLEMORE, WARDEN

06-8365 GILL, MARTINES A. V. ILLINOIS

06-8366 HAYES, HENRY C. V. CALIFORNIA

06-8370 HIRT, PATRICK K. V. MT DEPT. OF LABOR, ET AL.

06-8371 HARRIS, SHAWN D. V. JACKSON, WARDEN

06-8375 SANCHEZ, JOSE E. V. UNITED STATES

06-8376 STOKER, RONALD L. V. WATSON, WARDEN

06-8382 REYES, REFUGIO G. V. LEWIS, WARDEN

06-8384 NOLAN, MARK K. V. OKLAHOMA

06-8385 PARKER, JOHN E. V. McDONOUGH, SEC., FL DOC

06-8389 AZUAKOEMU, OKECHUKWU V. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN.

06-8390 BURGIN, LAURENCE K. V. LUND, SUPT., CLARINDA

06-8393 JUNIORS, GLYNN V. LOUISIANA

06-8396 ABULKHAIR, ASSEM A. V. BANKS, REUBEN

06-8397 ABULKHAIR, ASSEM A. V. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

06-8401 BADEAUX, JOSEPH T. V. LeBLANC, WARDEN

06-8402 BURNSED, JOSEPH S. V. WARD, WARDEN, ET AL.

06-8404 SIEGEL, MATTHEW V. GRIEVANCE COMM.

06-8406 REYNOLDS, FREDDY J. V. INDIANA

06-8407 PALMER, CHARLES E. V. McDONOUGH, SEC., FL DOC, ET AL.

06-8408 MORRISON, DONALD V. ROMANOWSKI, WARDEN

06-8409 LINN, HUBERT V. KIOWA COUNTY DISTRICT COURT

06-8412 SMITH, TIMOTHY V. MASSACHUSETTS

06-8413 SHARIAT, AZIM V. ORANGE COUNTY, CA

06-8414 BALDWIN, NITA V. STOVALL, WARDEN

06-8415 BUTLER, CHARLES V. OHIO

50

Page 51: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 51/66

06-8419 SHELTON, DAVID V. UNITED STATES

06-8421 RANDANT, DALE R. V. OREGON

06-8422 KOPP, JAMES C. V. NEW YORK

06-8426 NEUMAN, KENNETH L. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-8428 GUTIERREZ, VINCENT V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-8434 THOMAS, DENNIS V. ILLINOIS

06-8437 HEETER, THOMAS W. V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CA

06-8442 BASEER, JAFAAR C. V. HALL, WARDEN

06-8444 BASKETT, RONALD L. V. WASHINGTON, ET AL.

06-8446 PISA, SOMDETH V. BLANKS, LESLIE, ET AL.

06-8447 PARACHA, SAIFULLAH V. GATES, SEC. OF DEFENSE, ET AL.

06-8450 MONIQUE J. V. CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY, ET AL.

06-8457 GILLARD, LISA J. V. S. NEW ENGLAND SCHOOL OF LAW

06-8458 FOX, CHERUNDA V. YUKINS, WARDEN, ET AL.

06-8459 NICKERSON, SHERMAN V. PRICE, WARDEN

06-8461 ARNETT, MARCUS G. V. ANTRIM, COMM'R, AK DOC

06-8462 ALICEA, LUIS A. V. McCULLOUGH, SUPT., HOUTZDALE

06-8465 ZOCARAS, YAN M. V. CASTRO, DETECTIVE, ET AL.

06-8466 PAIGE, BILLY J. V. BIRKETT, WARDEN

06-8467 HARRIS, JASPER V. VIRGINIA

06-8473 HOLT, CRAIG W. V. MONTANA

06-8477 GRAY, MICHAEL A. V. MICHIGAN

06-8484 BOOKER, JOE L. V. HENRICKS, MICHELE L.

06-8486 SNELLING, LONNIE V. WPC CORP.

06-8487 SELLS, MARK E. V. UNITED STATES

06-8488 RHODES, LONNIE V. UNITED STATES

06-8492 CLEM, JASON V. VIRGINIA

06-8494 TURNER, JAMES R. V. FAA, ET AL.

51

Page 52: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 52/66

06-8499 BLANCHETTE, RICHARD A. V. KANSAS

06-8502 CERRITOS, MAURICIO V. VIRGINIA

06-8503 DELACRUZ, FELIPE R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8505 ESCAMILLA-VASQUEZ, JUAN C. V. UNITED STATES

06-8506 TENSLEY, DARIAN V. UNITED STATES

06-8510 WILLIAMS, RODNEY H. V. USDC ED VA

06-8511 THOMPSON, DENNIS V. BATTAGLIA, WARDEN

06-8515 BROWN, ALVIN V. BELLEQUE, SUPT., OR

06-8517 EVANS, LARRY L. V. UNITED STATES

06-8518 CARILLO-COLLAZO, PEDRO V. UNITED STATES

06-8519 COOPER, JARROT A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8520 RAMIREZ-GUERRERO, ROBERTO V. UNITED STATES

06-8521 WILLIAMS, DAVID A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8522 SHERROD, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES

06-8523 RODRIGUEZ, JESUS M. V. UNITED STATES

06-8525 SANDOZ, DJUAN V. NEVADA

06-8528 AGUILAR-HERRERA, DIAGO V. UNITED STATES

06-8530 BEST, JASON V. UNITED STATES

06-8533 DITTON, MICHAEL H. V. MONTANA

06-8535 ECKHARDT, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES

06-8536 CROOKS, DANIEL A., ET UX. V. CIR

06-8537 VERA, JUAN C. V. UNITED STATES

06-8539 YOUNG, BRAD W. V. UNITED STATES

06-8542 RUSSI-OBANDO, ISMAEL V. UNITED STATES

06-8543 WINSTON, MONTE D. V. UNITED STATES

06-8545 TRAN, LOC V. PALAKOVICH, SUPT., SMITHFIELD

06-8549 ALEXANDER, DONALD J., ET UX. V. ND BD. OF UNIV. AND SCHOOL LANDS

06-8550 YOUNG, ANDRE B. V. RICHARDS, SUPT., SCC, ET AL.

52

Page 53: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 53/66

06-8554 MANNA, RALPH V. UNITED STATES

06-8561 BACA, NATHAN M. V. UNITED STATES

06-8562 ALLEN, MARK S. V. GOLD COUNTY CASINO, ET AL.

06-8563 BURDEN, SHANE V. WOOD, ROBERT

06-8567 ZHU, XIANGYUAN V. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN.

06-8568 JONES, LUKE V. UNITED STATES

06-8569 MARTINEZ-GONZALEZ, ISABEL V. UNITED STATES

06-8570 LUMSDEN, LOUIS V. UNITED STATES

06-8572 JONES, KELLY R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8573 JAMES, TONY V. UNITED STATES

06-8574 LOVE, AARON V. BEZY, WARDEN

06-8579 O'KEEFE, MICHAEL A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8581 MICKLE, ALLEN S. V. UNITED STATES

06-8582 QUESADA-LERMA, ENRIQUE V. UNITED STATES

06-8584 COTTON, JULIET R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8585 COTTON, JULIET R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8586 CARTER, RICHARDE D. V. UNITED STATES

06-8588 CRAIG, MARC S. V. UNITED STATES

06-8590 LIBRETTI, JOSEPH V. V. UNITED STATES

06-8591 KOKOSKI, MICHAEL A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8595 PROCTOR, EUGENE H. V. JOHNSON, DIR., VA DOC

06-8596 MEDINA, ALBERT V. NEVADA

06-8598 LAWRENCE, NAVAL A. V. WASHINGTON, DIR., DC DOC, ET AL.

06-8601 OAKLEY, STEPHEN J. V. FLORIDA

06-8604 BECKETT, HARRY V. GRACE, SUPT., HUNTINGDON, ET AL.

06-8606 PURCELL, WILLARD H. V. ILLINOIS

06-8607 McGOLDRICK, BRIAN J. V. McKUNE, WARDEN

06-8609 PRESLEY, TALA V. BARNHART, COMM'R., SOCIAL SEC.

53

Page 54: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 54/66

06-8610 SWECKER, CHARLES B. V. UNITED STATES

06-8614 SMALL, CLIVE L. V. UNITED STATES

06-8616 ROGERS, GERALD L. V. USDC ND TX

06-8617 QUENGA, JOSEPH A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8619 RUSSELL, DEPREE D. V. SUBLETT, SAMUEL, ET AL.

06-8620 SALCEDO, ROGER R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8621 SHERRILL, JAMES V. COMMANDANT, USDB, ET AL.

06-8622 ROBINSON, CHARLES E. V. UNITED STATES

06-8623 SHEPARD, TIMOTHY V. MICHIGAN

06-8624 RODRIGUEZ, ALBERTO V. UNITED STATES

06-8626 DOBBS, KASPER L. V. UNITED STATES

06-8629 MOLETTE, SHON V. UNITED STATES

06-8630 WILSON, TIRENZY V. UNITED STATES

06-8632 KAHAWAIOLA'A, PATRICK L. V. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.

06-8634 MAYS, MELVIN L. V. UNITED STATES

06-8636 TALEBNEJAD, FARHAD, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

06-8637 ZUNIGA-CHAVEZ, LEOPOLDO V. UNITED STATES

06-8638 TRUMBAUER, JAMES V. UNITED STATES

06-8639 ZANGWILL, REBECCA K. V. UNITED STATES

06-8641 VAUGHN, ANDRE V. UNITED STATES

06-8642 MURPHY, JOHN P. V. MINNESOTA

06-8644 TRINIDAD-RODRIGUEZ, OSCAR E. V. UNITED STATES

06-8645 YOCUM, CHELSEA V. UNITED STATES

06-8647 MEDINA, MAGADALENO V. UNITED STATES

06-8648 JOINER, JIMMY W. V. UNITED STATES

06-8649 MANDERS, JEFFERY W. V. UNITED STATES

06-8654 PANTOJA, MANUEL V. UNITED STATES

06-8656 SMITH, KENDRICK N. V. UNITED STATES

54

Page 55: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 55/66

06-8657 SCOTT, WILBUR V. UNITED STATES

06-8660 CLARK, ROBERT H. V. UNITED STATES

06-8666 POLANCO, AQUILE V. UNITED STATES

06-8668 MORRIS, GLORIA V. UNITED STATES

06-8669 MUHAMMAD, HASHIM S. V. UNITED STATES

06-8670 POLLEY, WILLIE J. V. JETER, WARDEN

06-8671 MOORE, ARMAND D. V. UNITED STATES

06-8673 WILLIAMS, TROY V. USPS

06-8676 SANCHEZ-PEREZ, MARIO V. UNITED STATES

06-8680 STROZIER, JIMMY L. V. USPS, ET AL.

06-8684 COFFMAN, MICHAEL R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8689 PIXLEY, RENARDO V. UNITED STATES

06-8692 MARTIN, JAIMOND D. V. UNITED STATES

06-8694 PURVIS, SHAMSADEEN I. V. UNITED STATES

06-8698 BERRY, DEMETRIUS E. V. FERRELL, WARDEN

06-8703 HICKS, GREGORY V. UNITED STATES

06-8705 HUNTER, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES

06-8707 HOLLIDAY, JAMES V. UNITED STATES

06-8709 HOWELL, ANGELA N. V. UNITED STATES

06-8712 HAMMOND, MELVIN V. ILLINOIS

06-8715 HARPER, LAZERRIC V. ILLINOIS

06-8719 DAVID, ROBERT E. V. UNITED STATES

06-8720 CABALLERO-ROBLES, ROBERTO V. UNITED STATES

06-8723 CHOUDHRY, AZIM V. UNITED STATES

06-8724 DREW, CHRIS R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8725 FLOYD, MARLYS V. UNITED STATES

06-8727 OLIVAS-PENA, LORENZO V. UNITED STATES

06-8729 PROVENCIO, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES

55

Page 56: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 56/66

06-8730 MONTANO-PONCE, HECTOR V. UNITED STATES

06-8732 JIMENEZ-FLORES, RUBEN V. UNITED STATES

06-8733 LAINEZ-FLORES, MIGUEL A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8734 KINGSLEY, SHELDON O. V. UNITED STATES

06-8736 REESE-THOMAS, CHRISTOPHER V. UNITED STATES

06-8740 COPLIN, EDDIE V. UNITED STATES

06-8743 RICE, LEE V. UNITED STATES

06-8744 ) ROMERO, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES)

06-8756 ) SANTIAGO, ISRAEL V. UNITED STATES

06-8745 SERRANO, RAYMOND V. UNITED STATES

06-8749 ALLEN, WILLIE R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8751 AVILA-RODRIGUEZ, PEDRO V. UNITED STATES

06-8752 ABDUSH-SHAKUR, SHAKIR V. UNITED STATES

06-8757 PEARSON, MARION E. V. LEE, RANDALL, ET AL.

06-8760 PEOPLES, KAVIN V. UNITED STATES

06-8761 STUBBS, MICHAEL D. V. UNITED STATES

06-8766 BLOM, DONALD A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8770 NEVELS, SHAVAR V. ILLINOIS

06-8771 MOSLEY, CHARLES J. V. UNITED STATES

06-8772 CHANEY, CARLTON L. V. UNITED STATES

06-8773 CANADY, REGGIE W. V. UNITED STATES

06-8775 NEARY, CHRISTOPHER D. V. UNITED STATES

06-8777 ERBO, JOSE V. UNITED STATES

06-8782 ROMERO-FLORES, HUGO V. UNITED STATES

06-8790 JIMINEZ, PEDRO V. UNITED STATES

06-8794 SUGGS, ALONZO V. O'BRIEN, WARDEN

06-8796 SIMMONDS, GORDON R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8801 ARNOLD, TIFFANY V. UNITED STATES

56

Page 57: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 57/66

06-8803 CARRILLO, ANSELMO V. UNITED STATES

06-8804 ZHU, XIANGYUAN V. UNITED STATES

06-8811 RAMIREZ-SANCHEZ, ALFREDO V. UNITED STATES

06-8815 BERGMAN, GWEN V. UNITED STATES

06-8823 RODRIGUEZ-CAMARGO, JOSE L. V. UNITED STATES

06-8824 RODRIGUEZ, JOSE R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8825 RODRIGUEZ-SANCHEZ, RUFINO V. UNITED STATES

06-8831 OLIVIERI, MICHELLE V. UNITED STATES

06-8837 BRADSHAW, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES

06-8843 BALLESTERO, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES

06-8844 ESPINAL, GEORGE V. UNITED STATES

06-8847 ELLIS, BORIS V. UNITED STATES

06-8853 PROVENCIO, ERIC C. V. UNITED STATES

06-8855 ROBINSON, RAY R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8856 SALAZAR-ESTRADA, LUIS V. UNITED STATES

06-8857 RODRIGUEZ-DELMA, EDUARDO V. UNITED STATES

06-8858 RODRIGUEZ, BERNARDO V. UNITED STATES

06-8860 ALEXANDER, ADE V. UNITED STATES

06-8863 LONG, RICHARD L. V. UNITED STATES

06-8866 THOMAS, CHARLES C. V. UNITED STATES

06-8870 AREVALO, EDWARD R. V. CIR

06-8874 WATSON, VINCENT V. UNITED STATES

06-8878 MORA, JOSE V. UNITED STATES

06-8879 YOUNG, LARRY V. PIERCE, WARDEN

06-8880 CARLISLE, JAMES R. V. UNITED STATES

06-8881 DEMEULENAERE, CRAIG A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8884 EATMON, BENNIE J. V. UNITED STATES

06-8885 STEVENS, JERRY R. V. UNITED STATES

57

Page 58: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 58/66

06-8888 WUSEBIO, MELVIN V. UNITED STATES

06-8889 TAYLOR, MILTON J. V. GARDNER, JUDGE, ETC., ET AL.

06-8891 RAYON-SANTIAGO, FRANCISCO V. UNITED STATES

06-8897 BLATT, STACY A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8899 ALBERT, CORNELIUS A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8908 SOUTHERLAND, VINCE A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8909 TACKETT, JOHN P. V. UNITED STATES

06-8912 MORERA-VIGO, ELIEZER V. UNITED STATES

06-8914 LEWIS, WILLIAM D. V. UNITED STATES

06-8915 MURGA, LUCIANO V. UNITED STATES

06-8916 PENALOZA-ZARATE, AUGUSTIN V. UNITED STATES

06-8918 POLLARD, MELVIN V. UNITED STATES

06-8920 PHILLIPS, FRANK V. UNITED STATES

06-8921 MUNGUIA-LUCATERO, JOSE M. V. UNITED STATES

06-8923 RIOS-GARCIA, JORGE V. UNITED STATES

06-8931 PETTIGREW, DAVID V. UNITED STATES

06-8932 MINTEER, ROBERT L. V. CIR

06-8935 EL AMIN, MOHAMMED V. UNITED STATES

06-8943 BURGESS, STEVEN J. V. WATTERS, STEVEN

06-8944 AMOS, DAVID A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8945 PERKINS, LESLIE V. UNITED STATES

06-8946 PALMER, GREGORY L. V. UNITED STATES

06-8947 NNAJI, SYLVESTER, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES

06-8950 CANADY, CHARLES G. V. UNITED STATES

06-8951 CARRILLO-MARTINEZ, LUIS S. V. UNITED STATES

06-8952 CORREA, ALEJANDRO V. UNITED STATES

06-8953 DOCKERY, REGINALD J. V. UNITED STATES

06-8957 MOORE, JOHN H. V. UNITED STATES

58

Page 59: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 59/66

06-8958 ANGULO-PALACIOS, VICTOR M. V. UNITED STATES

06-8959 VANDYKE, ANTAWAN V. UNITED STATES

06-8960 WICKE, JOSHUA V. UNITED STATES

06-8961 VELAZQUEZ-ALCARAZ, MARCELINO V. UNITED STATES

06-8962 ORTIZ, JESUS A. S. V. UNITED STATES

06-8963 SMITH, ANTONIO L. V. UNITED STATES

06-8964 LEAL-RIVERA, CESAR A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8967 PRICE, THOMAS D. V. OUTLAW, WARDEN

06-8971 CASTELO-VALENCIA, DANIEL V. UNITED STATES

06-8975 LOPEZ-ESTRADA, SIMON V. UNITED STATES

06-8980 ADKINS, JARAMY A. V. UNITED STATES

06-8984 WADDELL, DERRILL V. UNITED STATES

06-8985 THOMAS, DARREN V. UNITED STATES

06-8986 WALLETTE, HAROLD L. V. UNITED STATES

06-8993 SAID, MOHAMMED V. UNITED STATES

06-8994 RODRIGUEZ, JULIO C. V. UNITED STATES

06-8996 SEARS, BRUCE V. UNITED STATES

06-8998 SMITH, DAVID E. V. UNITED STATES

06-9015 EVANS, ROY V. UNITED STATES

06-9016 HERNANDEZ, JUAN M. V. UNITED STATES

06-9017 HARRINGTON, FREDERICK T. V. UNITED STATES

06-9020 GARCIA-CORTEZ, JUAN V. UNITED STATES

06-9021 HESTER, WILLIAM A. V. UNITED STATES

06-9022 HALL, RICHARD L. V. UNITED STATES

06-9024 GUTIERREZ-MIRA, JUAN V. UNITED STATES

06-9025 HILL, BILLY J. V. UNITED STATES

06-9029 GRABLE, KIRK V. UNITED STATES

06-9030 FLORES-GONZALES, ADAN V. UNITED STATES

59

Page 60: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 60/66

06-9031 HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ, JESUS V. UNITED STATES

06-9032 HILEY, REGINALD V. UNITED STATES

06-9033 HOFMANN, ALLEN M. V. UNITED STATES

06-9037 BERNARD, JACKY V. UNITED STATES

06-9040 ESPINOZA-CAPUCHINA, ELEAZAR V. UNITED STATES

06-9041 COFFINDAFFER, SHANE J. V. UNITED STATES

06-9045 ANDERSON, MATTHEW S. V. UNITED STATES

06-9050 VILLEGAS-HERNANDEZ, EFREN V. UNITED STATES

06-9055 THOMPSON, SEAN V. REVELL, WARDEN

06-9058 TURNER, GUS V. UNITED STATES

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

05-1536 FRANK, WARDEN, ET AL. V. KAUA, WAYMAN

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is

denied.

06-439 ) SUMMERS, JERRY, ET AL V. STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO.)

06-602 ) STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. V. JERRY SUMMERS, ET AL.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice

Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these

petitions.

06-534 INITIATIVE INSTITUTE, ET AL. V. HERBERT, GARY, ET AL.

The motion of Western Wildlife Conservancy, et al. for leave

to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a

writ of certiorari is denied.

06-592 KONTEH, KHELLEH V. BELL, CHRISTOPHER

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is

denied.

60

Page 61: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 61/66

06-623 MISISCHIA, ARTHUR J. V. ST. JOHN'S MERCY HEALTH SYSTEMS

The motion of Association of American Physicians and

Surgeons for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

06-744 STACEY, RAYMOND V. HERMITAGE, PA, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice

Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

06-843 MORRISON, LARRY V. MADISON DEARBORN CAPITAL, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. The Chief

Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

06-844 MILLER, JEFFREY B. V. CONCHATTA, INC., ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice

Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

06-7611 J. B. V. OHIO

The motion of Juvenile Law Center for leave to file a brief

as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of

certiorari is denied.

06-8153 CRANE, EUGENE V. LAZARO, LUIS, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is

dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

06-8266 OKPALA, OKEY G. V. DREW, WARDEN, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is

dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly

61

Page 62: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 62/66

abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept

any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner

unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the

petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin

v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per 

curiam ). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases

cited therein.

06-8276 SPURLOCK, GILBERT L. V. BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice

Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

06-8287 KIKUMURA, YU V. HOOD, WARDEN, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice

Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

06-8299 ANDREWS, ANTOLIN V. HAFEY, TONI, ET AL.

06-8420 STEPHEN, JIMMIE V. HERNANDEZ, WARDEN, ET AL.

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of certiorari

are dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

06-8445 MURDOCK, MARK A. V. AM. EX. CENTURION BANK, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is

dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly

abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept

any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner

unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the

petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin

62

Page 63: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 63/66

v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per 

curiam ). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases

cited therein.

06-8483 BRITTON, JIMMY R. V. AIMCO SANDALWOOD L.P.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice

Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

06-9046 CARSON, SAMUEL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. The Chief

Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

06-931 IN RE JOYCE PATTERSON-BEGGS

06-8448 IN RE SAIFULLAH PARACHA

06-8605 IN RE GREGORY T. MILLER

06-8690 IN RE DERRICK N. NORRIS

06-8738 IN RE ANTHONY W. DAVIS

06-8768 IN RE CHRISTOPHER THOMAS

06-8805 IN RE WILLIE PROCTOR

06-8861 IN RE LA TOYA C. TURNER

06-8900 IN RE JAMES W. BRAMMER

06-9112 IN RE BILLY R. SIMS

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

06-8902 IN RE VAN L. BREWER

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus

is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

63

Page 64: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 64/66

MANDAMUS DENIED

06-809 IN RE JOYCE PATTERSON-BEGGS

06-810 IN RE PAUL R. JONES

06-846 IN RE M2 SOFTWARE, INC.

06-7793 IN RE RICKY O. BECKHAM

06-8132 IN RE ROY J. FRYER

06-8295 IN RE CHARLES ROSS

06-8449 IN RE SAIFULLAH PARACHA

06-8478 IN RE RICKIE A. WILSON

06-8529 IN RE JASON BEST

The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.

06-745 IN RE RAYMOND STACEY

The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. Justice

Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

06-754 IN RE EILEEN VEY

06-8270 IN RE WILLIAM B. WALKER

The petitions for writs of mandamus and/or prohibition are

denied.

06-8904 IN RE DAVID E. WATTLETON

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is

dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

REHEARINGS DENIED

05-6764 ALLEN, BILLIE J. V. UNITED STATES

05-11082 BAKER, CHARLES R. V. REXROAD, EVERETT, ET AL.

06-122 SAMADI, MIKE H. V. MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A.

06-139 SHAKIR, SAFWAT H. V. PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIV., ET AL.

64

Page 65: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 65/66

06-155 SCHIANO, ELEANOR, ET VIR V. MBNA CORP., ET AL.

06-329 DUFF, LINDA, ET VIR V. LEWIS, RICHARD W., ET AL.

06-379 WAGNER, EMILY A. V. BD. OF SUPV'S OF LSU, ET AL.

06-395 GROSS, WILLARD D. V. IRTZ, FRED

06-471 PERSIK, RAYMOND C. V. SUTHERS, ATT'Y GEN. OF CO

06-476 BROGDON, GARY P. V. McMASTER, ATT'Y GEN. OF SC

06-488 MICKENS, RONNIE, ET UX. V. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY, ET AL.

06-495 ERICKSON, RONALD W. V. WA DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES

06-515 M2 SOFTWARE, INC. V. M2 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

06-540 TROJANEK, WACLAW M. V. SAFEWAY, INC., ET AL.

06-552 PUNCHARD, BILLY L. V. BUR. OF LAND MGMT., ET AL.

06-565 IN RE ANDREW J. JOHNSON

06-569 LOVE, MARVIN V. DEPT. OF JUSTICE

06-5647 IN RE DOUGAL SAMUELS

06-5739 McCANEY, DONALD C. V. UNITED STATES

06-5758 MANN, ROBERT C. V. UNITED STATES

06-5959 MARTINEZ, LUIS N. V. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ

06-6135 MOSES, NEAL V. UNITED STATES

06-6250 VEGA, PETRO V. KLEM, SUPT., MAHANOY, ET AL.

06-6269 IN RE RICHARD N. HILL, JR.

06-6401 PINCKNEY, VERNON V. McDONOUGH, SEC., FL DOC, ET AL.

06-6438 ZENDRAN, PETER V. PROVIDENCE POLICE DEPT.

06-6447 LEVERTON, DAVID R. V. POPE, JEFFREY, ET AL.

06-6459 HARRIS, VIRGIL L. V. GLADES CORR. INST.

06-6573 LINDSEY, RANDY C. V. MISSISSIPPI

06-6624 ABNEY, CAREY V. DiGUGLIELMO, SUPT., GRATERFORD

06-6644 ANDREWS, ANTHONY V. MOORE, KIMBERLY A., ET AL.

06-6645 BENJAMIN, FRANKLIN A. V. EAGLETON, WARDEN, ET AL.

65

Page 66: US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

8/14/2019 US Supreme Court: 022007pzor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/us-supreme-court-022007pzor 66/66

06-6819 CARTER, MARY V. RANDOLPH COUNTY JAIL

06-6856 YOUNG, WILLIE V. UNITED STATES

06-6871 COUSIN, FRED L. V. KROGER COMPANY

06-6909 JEFFERSON, DANNY V. WARDEN, W. CARROLL DETENTION

06-7010 CAMPBELL, JAMES A. V. POLK, WARDEN

06-7054 McCASLIN, BONNIE V. BARNHART, COMM'R, SOCIAL SEC.

06-7117 MEHRA, ANEIL K. V. LEWINSON, BARBARA K.

06-7137 FREEMAN, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES

06-7205 SIMMONDS, GORDON R. V. USCA 5

06-7258 BLACKMER, PAUL V. CATTELL, WARDEN

06-7282 PENA, VICTOR V. UNITED STATES

06-7293 BOWEN, TRESA L. V. LOS ANGELES, CA

06-7295 IN RE STEVEN A. McGEE

06-7321 DAY, MILTON V. UNITED STATES

06-7357 BROWN, JABORIE V. UNITED STATES

06-7398 COBB, MARVIN J. V. UNITED STATES

06-7481 LEON, JOHNNIE V. UNITED STATES

06-7563 BELL, DONALD P. V. UNITED STATES

06-7680 IN RE DANIEL L. DuMONDE

06-8143 EVANS, JAMES D. V. UNITED STATES

06-8164 DUNCAN, ANNEBELLE V. V. UNITED STATES

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

06-636 GOODMAN, LAURENCE R. V. UNITED STATES

06-5295 IN RE THEOPHILUS GREEN, ET AL.