us pnt advisory board (pntab) thoughts on assured pnt professor brad parkinson stanford university...

4
US PNT Advisory Board (PNTAB) Thoughts on Assured PNT Professor Brad Parkinson Stanford University Thanks to Sponsors: FAA, Aerospace (But all opinions are mine!)

Upload: christiana-weaver

Post on 18-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: US PNT Advisory Board (PNTAB) Thoughts on Assured PNT Professor Brad Parkinson Stanford University Thanks to Sponsors: FAA, Aerospace (But all opinions

US PNT Advisory Board (PNTAB) Thoughts on Assured PNT

Professor Brad ParkinsonStanford University

Thanks to Sponsors: FAA, Aerospace(But all opinions are mine!)

Page 2: US PNT Advisory Board (PNTAB) Thoughts on Assured PNT Professor Brad Parkinson Stanford University Thanks to Sponsors: FAA, Aerospace (But all opinions

PNT Advisory Board Views• Primary PNTAB Objective:– Assured PNT for all users (Resilient!)

• Current Assessment– No current or foreseeable alternative to GNSS (primarily GPS)

can deliver equivalent accuracy (to millimeters, 3D) and world wide 24/7 availability

– But “Space-to-Earth” L-Band signals are very weak• Therefore our Focus is PTA– Protect the radio spectrum + identify + prosecute interferers– Toughen GPS receivers against natural and human interference– Augment with additional PNT sources and techniques

Page 3: US PNT Advisory Board (PNTAB) Thoughts on Assured PNT Professor Brad Parkinson Stanford University Thanks to Sponsors: FAA, Aerospace (But all opinions

Augment with additional PNT sources and techniques

• eLoran–

• Modernized DMEs for aviation• Other GNSSs– “Only GPS is currently authorized for reception in US” –

FCC– RTCA SC159 working on MOPS including other GNSS– No plans to add other GNSS to WAAS

Summary of Results from Independent Review Board Re: Loran – Convened by US/DOS (2006)

• Unanimous Recommendation – deploy eLoran• DOT, DHS, and PNT EXCOM supported this recommendation• But eLoran was a victim of budget tightening, and dismantling or existing Loran stations began

Page 4: US PNT Advisory Board (PNTAB) Thoughts on Assured PNT Professor Brad Parkinson Stanford University Thanks to Sponsors: FAA, Aerospace (But all opinions

eLoran Previously Recommendedby PNT EXCOM

Conclusions – (DOT IRB Dec. 2006):• Assurance of PNT availability –a prudent & responsible policy– Critical safety-of-life & economic security applications

• eLoran is a cost-effective backup –to protect and extend GPS- for identified national critical GPS-based applications– Interoperable & independent– Different physical limitations & failure modes– Seamless operations & GPS threat deterrent

• Given US Government supportbelieve users will equip with eLoran as backup– International communitylooking for US leadershipSummary of Results from Independent Review Board

Re: Loran – Convened by US/DOS (2006)• Unanimous Recommendation – deploy eLoran• DOT, DHS, and PNT EXCOM supported this recommendation• But eLoran was a victim of budget tightening, and dismantling or existing Loran stations began