u.s. army corps of engineers drake chemical … · data review, multi-media, multi-concentration...
TRANSCRIPT
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERSDRAKE CHEMICAL SUPERFUND SITE182 MYRTLE STREETLOCK HAVEN, PA 17745717-748-4505 717-748-7549 FAX FIELD MEMO XO107
TO: SEE DISTRIBUTION BELOW
VIA: U.S. MAIL
FROM: DAVID MODRICKER, USAGE
DATE: JULY 29, 1997
RE:_____RISK BURN CONDITION 1 ___________________________
Transmitted is data from Risk Burn Condition 1 performed at the Drake Chemical Superrund Site. Thereport is comprised of five (5) volumes as follows:
ValidationVolume - Prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Volume 1 - Technical Report prepared by Midwest Research Institute/OHMRemediation Services Corporation
Volume 2 - Appendices A-C, prepared by Midwest Research Institute/OHMRemediation Services Corporation
Volume 3 - Appendices D-O, prepared by Midwest Research Institute/OHMRemediation Services Corporation
Volume 4 - Feed Results and Response to Comments, prepared by EnvironmentalChemical Corporation and OHM Remediation Services Corporationrespectively
DISTRIBUTION:Senator Corman Michael Welch, PADEPSenator Santorum Michael Werner, WestonSenator Spector Jeff Church, ATSDRCongressman Peterson Lock Haven City Hall RepositoryRepresentative Hanna Clinton County Courthouse RepositoiyKaren Krause, OGC, USEPA Ross Public Library RepositoryDorothy Canter, USEPA Stevenson Library RepositoryGregg Crystall, USEPA City of Lock Haven, Rick MarcinkevageRoni Warren, CH2M HELL Clinton County CommissionersMichael Ogden, USAGE Coreena Meyers, Clinton County Farm BureauJim Cheney, USAGE Bob Carnine, Lock Haven Environmental Advisory CommitteeDrake Project Office A.I.R.
COPY:MDCE OGDEN, USAGE, HAOFILE: 13590C n nq j
FIELD MEMO - FMX0107 H; n O I
\
DRAKE CHEMICAL SUPERFUND SITERISK BURN - CONDITION 1
Data Validation Volume
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYr < REGION m
PRC*«-& 841 Chestnut BuildingPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-4431
DRAKE SUPERFUND SITETRANSMITTAL OF DATA FROM RISK BURN CONDITION 1
The attached documents present the data obtained from samples of theemissions from the stack of the Drake Superfund Site Thermal Destruction Unit,during Risk Burn Condition 1. The first document is a report by Roy F. Weston,Inc., the contractor selected by EPA to validate the Trial Bum data and to conductthe Risk Assessment. This report outlines the procedures used to validate the datacollected during Risk Burn Condition 1 and presents the data from Risk Burn 1 thatwill be used in the preparation of the Risk Assessment. The documents fromMidwest Research Institute (MRI), the air sampling contractor during the TrialBurn phase of the project, labeled Volumes 1,2 and 3, provide a summary of all theraw data collected during Risk Burn 1. The document labeled Volume 4 containsfeed results, and responses to comments prepared by OHM.
The raw data submitted to the Agency by MRI was subjected to a rigorousvalidation procedure by Weston. The data that met the sampling and analyticalQuality Assurance/Quality Control requirements and which will contribute to thedata set for the Risk Assessment are noted in the Weston report. The validated RiskBurn Condition 1 reports indicate that most emissions data collected during thisphase of the Trial Burn are acceptable for use in the Risk Assessment.
Supporting documentation will be available in each of the 4 localrepositories. Data for Risk Burn Condition 2 and Trial Burn Conditions 1 and 2 arecurrently undergoing the validation process and will be made available to the publicshortly.
-•77Cfysiall,LiyJSEPADrake Project Manager
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
Drake Chemical Superfund SiteRisk Burn Condition 1 Reports
Table of Contents
Data Validation Volume
USEPA Letter Transmitting Risk Burn Condition 1 ReportData Validation Package (Roy F. Weston, Inc.)
Volume 1 - Technical Report (Midwest Research Institute/OHM Remediation Services Corp.)
Section 1 - IntroductionSection 2 - Operating DataSection 3 - Test ResultsSection 4 - Quality Assurance Report
Volume 2 - Appendices A through C (Midwest Research Institute/OHM Remediation ServicesCorp.)
Appendix A - List of Samples CollectedAppendix B - Field Sampling DataAppendix C - Process Data
Volume 3 - Appendices D through O (Midwest Research Institute/OHM Remediation ServicesCorp.)
Appendix D - Modified Method 5 Particulate Data and Modified Method 5 CalculationData
Appendix E - Calibration Data for Sampling EquipmentAppendix F - Report on Chemical Analysis Results for Semivolatile OrganicsAppendix G - Report on Chemical Analysis Results for PCDD/PCDFAppendix H - Report on Chemical Analysis Results for HerbicidesAppendix I - Report on Chemical Analysis Results for VOCsAppendix J - Report on Chemical Analysis Results for MetalsAppendix K - Report on Chemical Analysis Results for Hexavalent ChromiumAppendix L - Report on Chemical Analysis Results for PCBsAppendix M - Report on Chemical Analysis Results for ChloridesAppendix N - Continuous Emission Monitoring Data for SO2Appendix O - Example Calculations
Volume 4 - Feed Results and Response to Comments (Environmental Chemical Corp./OHMRemediation Services Corp.)
Feed Analysis ResultsResponse to comments on the Draft Risk Burn Condition 1 Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.1 Weston WayWest Chester, Pennsylvania 19380-1499610-701-3000 • Fax 610-701-3186
MANAGERS \* T OH3iGN£?S,CCNSlL'ANT3
Mr. Eric W. JohnsonUS Environmental Protection Agency, Region EH841 Chestnut Bldg.Philadelphia. PA. 19107
Subject: Transmittal of Revised Data Summary Memorandum Text
25 July 1997
SATA Contract #68-55-3002TDD #9701-02A/02B
Dear Eric;
As requested, enclosed are two copies of the revised Drake Chemical Site Incinerator Data SummaryMemoranda. By copy of this letter I have transmitted 20 copies of this document to Mr. DavidModricker at the Drake Site in LockHaven, PA.
Please let me know whether you need additional copies of this document. Thank you again for theopportunity to assist your office in this project.
Very truly yours,Roy F. _Weston, Inc.
Michael T. Werner, JDSenior Section Manager
Enclosures
cc: G. JaniecD. Modricker (USAGE - LockHaven)
--— • • - - A-R3JMO&Click to WESTON On The Web httpj/www.rfweston.com
DRAKE CHEMICAL SITE INCINERATOR TRIAL BURN PROCESSDATA VALIDATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW:
RISK BURN CONDITION 1
1.0 BACKGROUND
Midwest Research Institute (MRI) collected and analyzed stack emission data, soilfeed, fly ash, condensate and bottom ash during the Drake Chemical Site IncineratorTrial Burn process, encompassing risk burn conditions 1 and 2 and corresponding trialburn conditions 1 and 2. Multiple reports have been presented by MRI of the results ofthis data collection effort.
Roy F, Weston, Inc. (WESTON) was tasked by EPA Region III to undertake a datavalidation and quality assurance review of the MRI data reports , There were threemain purposes of this review:1) To determine whether the reported results for Risk Burn 1 met the sampling and
analytical goals of the trial burn process;2) To evaluate the data quality for the upcoming risk assessment; and,3) Prepare the data summary tables for the risk assessment.
This review concluded that the Risk Burn 1 data is consistent with the goals of the trialburn plan and that the data is generally acceptable for use in the risk assessment. Thedata tables included in this report are the Risk Burn 1 results that will be used (alongwith validated data from the other trial and risk burns) in the risk assessment beingprepared by WESTON for EPA.
A data validation and quality assurance review has been completed for MRI's RiskBurn 1 sampling and analysis reports. The results of this review have been presented ina series of nine technical reports that are summarized below. The complete technicalreports are available in the Drake Administrative Record and the documentrepositories.
2.0 METHODOLOGY;
2.1 Technical Review
A technical review of MRI's Risk Bum 1 stack gas emission sampling and analysisprocess and results was conducted. The following elements of the MRI reports wereevaluated:
• Compliance with the Trial Burn and Quality Assurance Plans (Trial Bum Plan forthe Drake Chemical Superfund Site's Mobile Hazardous Waste Incinerator, MRI
7/25/97
AR3UW9 .
Project No. 3620-09-21 Volume 1, Trial Burn Plan, Volume U Project'QualityAssurance Plan, Revised September 20, 1996).
• Compliance with EPA sampling and analytical procedures, where appropriate (40CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Methods with Revisions, USEPA); Part 266,Appendix LX, Methods Manual for Compliance with the BJJF Regulations, July 17,1991).
• Compliance with the Handbook for "Quality Assurance Quality Control (QA/QC)Procedures for Hazardous Waste Incineration" (EPA-625/6-89/023, January1990).
• Traceability records.
• Emission Rate Calculation Methodology
The results of this review have been reported in Technical Review of Field SamplingProcedures. Analytical Methods, and Reported Results: Risk Bum 1. Drake ChemicalSuperfund Site. Roy F. Weston, Inc., June 1997. This report is summarized below.
2.2 Data Validation and Quality Assurance Review
The MRI test result reports were reviewed by WESTON and its affiliate, RECRALabNet, using the following data validation guidance documents:
• Region HI Modification to USEPA National Functional Guidelines for OrganicData Review, Multi-Media, Multi-Concentration (OLMO 1.0 - OLMO1.9),September 1994.
• Region HI Modification to USEPA National Functional Guidelines for OrganicData Review, Multi-Media, Multi-Concentration (OLMO 1.0 - OLMO 1.6), June,1992 (Volatiles and Semivolatiles), and May 1993 (Pesticides and Arochlors). (Asamended by the September, 1994 guidance).
• Region UJ Modification to the Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelinesfor Evaluating Inorganic Analyses, April 1993
The results of WESTON's analyses have been reported as follows:
• Volatile Analysis Data Assessment Report. Risk Bum 1, 25 May 1997, revised 18June 1997.
•• Semivolatile/Pesticide Data Assessment Report. Risk Burn 1. 25 May 1997.
• Herbicide Analysis Data Review. Risk Burn 1, 9 June 1997.2 7/25/97
• Metal Analysis Data Review. Risk Burn 1, June 9, 1997.
• Pesticide/PCB Analyses Data Review. Risk Burn 1,10 June 1997
• Dioxin/Furan Data Validation. Risk Bum 1,16 June 1997.
• Chloride .Analyses Data Review. Risk Burn 1,17 June 1997
• Chromium .Analyses Data Review. Risk Burn 1, 17 June 1997.
The data tables from these reports are presented below,
3.0 RESULTS
3.1 Technical Review Results
3.1.1 Emission Test ResultsThe test data and test results were evaluated for each of the technical reports(Volatiles, Semivolatiles/Pesticides, Chlorides, Metals, Particulates, Dioxin/Furans, andPCBs). WESTON selected a single test run for each parameter and performedindependent calculations of emission rates. These rates were then compared to resultsreported by MRI. In general, WESTON's calculated emission rates comparedfavorably with MRI's reported values.
Evaluations of specific parameters were conducted and specific were discussed andresolved with EPA, OHM, and MRI. The following issues were raised and resolved:
VOST issues - short probe length, partial SIM analysis, actual condensate volumesused in calculations, reporting maximum values for either full scan SIM analysis,analyzing VOST tubes in pairs, and not analyzing the train B condensate.
MRI reported the 20 highest peaks from the VOST and full scan analyses for volatilesand semivolatiles. These peaks included both target analytes and other tentativelyidentified compounds (TICs). MRI is developing a process to reevaluate the peaks toidentify the 20 highest TICs. This will serve to further quantify the uncharacterizedfraction of organic compounds.
Particulate issues - incorrect barometric pressure on data sheet, run 1.
Chloride issues - incorrect barometric pressures on data sheet, run 1,
7/25/97
Dioxin/furan issues - OCDD levels in the toluene rinse, the use of glass frit supportpad and HDPE wash bottle and evaluation of the audit sample results.
SVOC and Pesticide issues - beta-naphthalamine surrogate recoveries and analyticalmethodology and pesticide surrogates.
PCB issues - PCB sample contamination, run 1 isokinetic sampling, partial loss of run2 sample rinse and the run 2 leak check.
Metals issues - Hg results in the KMnO4 and HC1 rinse fractions and the use of a glassfiber filter.
CEM issues - Process CEMs certification and calibrations, S02 run 1 post-testcalibration and S02 calibration gas certificates.
General issues regarding average volumetric flow rates were also discussed.
3.1.2 Review of General QA/QC ProceduresAnalytical QA/QC procedures were reviewed for completeness. All the identifiedQA/QC procedures for influent/effluent samples (excluding stack) were performedwith the following exception:
• TOC Bottom ash and fly ash quadruplicate analysis (only required for trial burns,not risk burns).
3.1.3 Review of Traceability RecordsThe traceability records, along with the listing of samples for analysis, satisfy theminimum sample custody requirements discussed in the Project Quality Assurance Planand the QA/QC Handbook. While minor discrepancies were noted, these were notexpected to impact reported data and results.
3.2 Results of Analytical Data Review
The samples were initially extracted and analyzed within the holding time. Initial andcontinuing calibration analyses were performed prior to analyses. Major problemswere not encountered during the sample analyses. Minor issues were noted, and arediscussed in detail in the respective reports listed above.
The following tables represent the results of the analytical data review. These tableswill serve as the basis for the calculation of emission rates for the Risk Burn 1condition. A glossary of data qualifier codes is presented.
7/25/97
GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES
CODES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION(CONFIDENCE CONCERNING PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF COMPOUNDS):
U = Not detected. The associated number indicates approximate sample concentrationnecessary to be detected.
(NO CODE) = Confirmed identification.
B = Not detected substantially above the level reported in laboratory or field blanks.
R = Unreliable result. Analyte may or may not be present in the sample. Supportingdata necessary to confirm result.
N = Tentative identification. Consider present. Special methods may be needed toconfirm its presence or absence in future sampling efforts.
CODES RELATED TO OUANTITAnON(can be used for both positive results and sample quantitation limits):
J = Analyte present. Reported value may not be accurate or precise.
K = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected tobe lower.
L = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to behigher.
UJ = Not detected, quantitation limit may be inaccurate of imprecise.
UL = Not detected, quantitation limit is probably higher.
OTHER CODES
Q = " No analytical result.
3"
Volatile Analysis Data Assessment Report Data Tables, Risk Burn 1,25 May 1997, revised 18 June 1997.
7/23/97
cc505zg
i s sa saS .§ 1o °> CD ED CD
—5 — 5 ~5eg (N o 01 oo co oo|8| N N ^f Q)
T) ,OO
CD CD CO CD 00-3 -5 -3-3-5""SjjSB5 00 0 3 0 > C N T -c « r o = « r i D - ^ c o£T" i -1oo
CM•<»•
CDa
Q>
i tig ffs e i ® l "Soils * 1 o> »"
p jL lllJllJjI IJlllJi ^
_ •*?• «a- » rs *? r so o CM co CM in CO^TOCMOO o> CM O). co in7e S^^ -"•£"> <£ « oS d *»• d - ^ - m N.
.^ -> ->-> -5-5 3 D -i -i Z)-J D-3 -J D_ w S ^ c 'i» |l < csiror-Trto • v i n t N ^ o ' - t O C s i10 "
CO "5 - —i CO —>-3-3-3-3-3l3-3-3-3-3-5:3-3-3Z>-3
7lSl* = tS^Sg ^CMCOCM fe. CO.
£ J2J2 SS; in N." in coC CM CMscon
«oeo '-«» - o>C5 - -r-
o. S2JS rs" in
"M <e> S 5 c ^ — •» tN PS cpcriJOCNCM " C O O CJCioo £2 S22^ n
CO f>-.g CN CM
* *
CO
:«!K
1rere03
retow'reQ.O)C
I
'S°-re
>- "5£ 3I £
8 ;£t— Z JS O35-3 in
/ >rn 9 „ in COMI > C fM CM
UJ
oin coc CM CM
J? CM CM
in coC CM CM= CMCM
JO CM CM
5 en N~
255_<oCO
a ^ S=> ^>CD S EC8s Is
•*• o in »-'-CM in co" ~ -
Ui
Irere
re: ^ &
"o £3 *~ "~ £
1 • . 8K « m^^_, „ - , - , - , -,„-,-,-, m I^ S 'J? ? o> (•- o> r— o coco CD CD »- p- o> in CM^CJJ "o•=58^ o o i n v t M <- C O C M C M C Dre Jj; co CM "u0- C co oJ^ O3 TKin . fl;SS M 2
K * C 1
'^SS2e> Oiooocein *-COCDCD om. CM <F-»-N.^- »- CMCOO o^'SCMCM m^*"^2 *""PO OS d*"f*'CN' *" m"?Q- 5: co 2 i;: N. en . . S oTI « co rt a.
" 8 5
-a g
-d .^ss ^ £c S S ' c ^ g='-'-' to .e
. . S *CO- iC-^ ict -3 m .-3-3v; —> —i —i rn rn m ^S
^ _ T5-3-3-3Ci03r)-5CD-sD-5^-3j«:DD^-5-5CDZ)CDD^^^ w gi-ScoSe J22f*-'"fsl "> ^••^co —in. o CM —cooin — vorr n' £gs| | ^{Q d co « S« o"J5^ CM - o 5£: to in *~ . —m co co oc CM CM AJ —
en ca eoD -5CC "^ -s -^ - 3 — 3 - ^ - 3
li ^= 3 -. " ss ^ s s sm»- CO CM COin C M C D C O C M
.&8 "01
21222. • ~> « "5 -s-sea. . -3-3 -3 oa — 5 '."""> *o-» 3 3 3 13 T> *» 3 -» *» D -5 3 3 -* is D D -» 13 -s 3 t> 3 -j -» -» t-^toSsc5 iC r?"*:*»'^c? cov'- — C M e q » - c o ' o - ^ •JOCMCM " d d c o d ^ d d "^d Hw. CO°^^ g ——2 co r-. "•
CO .5 iH< ^f-^in-^V-WCMCMTTCMh-CM'S-T CO'O-CM'-^inS.C-ginT- ^
co , jr;_1 Mw^. . - ,, , ,»,.«. - o «, .
S • * § 1 £ £ _ !z ^oD: " —•3 CL 'CD 5 CC /-\w <R iSJ tf jj 3
or
5cozOco
z>to m _ m ' „ c o mQ ^ X _ —5 03 —3 "5 CD -^ —3j— f: co ^ co "5 .51 in CD co -v co ••- T. co[2<< "^ CM w o> 10 d co d T-'CO'O'^> Q > c co a ^5"^ a>• co —^ -^ y m mm CD CD CD
5 . _ - 5 - 5 - 3 - 3 -3-3^3
< co^jco-g, T-' c o ' e o N - ' c d d d d
<d"* mm m m CD
C M - = O > ~* "* m - 5 - 3 = 3 - 3
icMC/)"Sl C M O C O O O T - ^or CM 5
m m m m m_ -5 -3 m =5 =5 ^3
*Zr}'o in.lft. °> t D . ° ? c s i£ CM co "si, co o co d d f~K- 3
D01
in 0-
CD
s ss|l .co o _j 2 r> o
or<2Z>CO
gcoii UJillIs-"Nu.' « PS»So^S 59^ m 33
Z ,"? °° 2 '5 S5 CM •»-; CM •«? N- m CM co in oq</s; ECMCO^. cricM i r i c d cri O C O I ^ T ^UjO =„ o> wr-
_ro'ov?' 't|v:10. t .™. "*. *! 4O.e910.00.C M C O ^ ; coosd ^ T C O N . ' oj oi oi d *•'CM g> ! CM T- T-
m m m m CD_ -3-3 - 5 - 5 - 3 - 3 — 3TIco'O'?' in.>*T " P 0 0 . *? T *R (—)ScMW^. COh-OO O C D C M C M C M O T -d - i 1 . c o C M
.5 fw CD * CM co in co — co 1 in Q ro h* . 05 ** o o co co in co co CD co h»> CD in co co 0"~dd^ddcMddddcs'ocodd'r"dCN'ddd -r^dd ^cocMdddddd CC.
i/i Q <=tQ
col
_ I* IliI ii§ 5 Illii< C '2 ££•=«„co£.. :3 » » » 5 S
CO
Semivolatile/Pesticide Data Assessment Report Data Tables, Risk Burn 1.25 May 1997.
7/23/97
AR3UU2I
»
0<2
. 3CO2»g1 —
1O" J_ ^^L j»~ _^ ^R?-fei^> >- <02or <
LU
1i01COmi
SITE:
RISKBURN1
i"cg1_cgK
•~£
.£ 10 i: 0)
( T—CD•oCoO
CDf2 CO .i: O>.E 0 < 3or CMX :CO o
u_ "*"
CJ 2: '-z y
8 ™m CM*— CM
ai
CLIENT SAMPLE IDs:
LABORATORY
SAMPL
MATRIX:
UNITS:
333333^333^333-'3^333-533333=?3"^3CMCO f«- C O T f CD O O C M C D^d "? c\ "t °J T ^ C D ^O ^" "*— O O ""SJ1 O3 O
« to *•sr eo co CDCO CM O) «3-d ^ ^r d
** COCO =5" CO IDO) CO CMi f d
« i, 1, COCM CM !*• CM CD CD O)^ d "*. CM m. cri coO f- T- O CM 00
—oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo*jdddddddddo'ddo'do"dddo'dddddddddddddO
« jgCD CO « » "I 1
1 11 ill it o li III ' I til£ C D C C .CCC N^~ £ gg ^Q.Q. » CDcT £ ,£
3 "§AS£.S.cD"§-£££o^— 5'1;1S££ •5i5'o;£: §'£iJ: ®' ]|> ' —
O ^COCOCD^sS^^'^CO^CO *^- *- — ±f CD CD >«i M J" Q ^ c c O C D C D C O C O ^ C OO QCQC0COOO'«-T-U.I.E2cMCM^'2CLQ.Q.. T-CNCN<<<CDCDCQ!5I5COO
<r
OlCO
gi
o
I I
iCO
co
_co"o
Q ' JJ
s, CO _ s; -j T-S•— - co CD CM co in T- coin O) cq CM T-. Q in
odd d o' o'
O S •=o <in ; g
01a*
T- i Q 2Z i m<3 ! S>
1 i1
co T- c> o> ~qit-; <5T T- CD^ CM odd
i, DO CO « CO « «coco inco in •»-*!}• IOOCMT-in O) CM it N. CM r-_ oq CDOTJ-' c o d d d t « - ' d e d
—ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo«sdddddo'ddddddddddddo'o'o'ddddddCD
o ~
O
• - - eO o o o o s ob A 4 .2
CO CO 'CM C O C M T— CO in Tj- -; f^. CM g
d r ^ c o " -^ d d i ^ d c M 13
CJT—
.£tn
a>
o—
_03 -J CD CO CO
1 i §s i ai
S m j= o, i * co =}S C M < : : I o o o r oc£i « *; IN
I CO CM O
x CO o
O •*
m min co in00 CO COco' in d
CO i, co co"> r*1 CO 00 CMs : 11 . a" s s! s * »s
2 ! if *M^ ' O. cv.
.— oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo—J T- TT— T— T— V-*— ^— T— T-T-^— T— T— T—T— *— T— T-^"*— ^—T-T— T—T— V V-T-T-T— T—^—
•jjddddo'ddddo'ddo'dddddo'do'dddddddo'o'dd
ormxzCO.K
iCO
enQOlQ! i £ « „ 32 2 co
CDco CD
*l i 11 iss ?l g in g I!*^ P f i ^ s s s g s . i o g i g § •?;-=«yco i E ££ 2SS o> S ffi fflg g5" J >?tl
II Is III! lllilLliiilf lltiULI!
SA TO i IIII Ill|l^l?iilf3 5S SB. 5. C D ^ - O O ® gw.J >,-=•= g s S
LI A A UNI
CL LA M COMPO
O
I II i
J 2 i —3—3 c o - 3 — 3 - 3c ; ~>g ! co co co q in •<*; N- cq CM -<t d co" d
>_ 5 ', d co in iri d d d d co CM •*
5 1 '
I i *co !
I 1 : & .Q -S g £ i5 i 2 co CD cod S CM "• = ' in 05 o in ^j:S C CM ' O O • * - • « -> CO I
: 5 o
CO .fc O5<
co « m «- 3 - 3 ^ >m CM CD CDco q CM ^rd T^ d d
m•i. ' CO —>> o j- .t oj _> ,-. _.. _ _. _». ,_ ,_——— •» .__ V' ^ ^ ^ . ^ ,, Q ^ j j fp - -— ^ . -T——
... v, -, oj tr in q CM m. <°. **-. in m. d m dOl 2$£^ o CM in co. o o o o o c o
—ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo•gdddddo'ddddddddddddo'ddd
lillll
AR3IH25
o
Ol
in
i! Jto; 15
i °
^ *> -^ <? '« C M " "
•o§
CD
— T-m o
co
~~> ~> CO ~~> CO CO CO
T- CO O) If) r- O CO CD« 01 O CM 0- CO 03 POO T- O T— CO r— T-
co co d
i»- mO) CM
mT- co g> o co co t'r °> "- r «. dO O O CM 00
j —oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo; *-do'dddddddddddo'o'dddddddddddo'dddo'dQ
! &! uj; M a!
• : 9si i y co3^i fi; >-:CQ-.t:-|-..'s a "••
~ I 1 "z o S «ySbt— . _l < < 2
CO | 02^3
Q •"•£
1O D03CQCOOQT-"'r-"li.x£2cN(N4Z CL CL DL'T-" CM," Of < < < CO CQ CD S S CO O
fl'R3 11*1*26
00
co
£ ' << co"o
CO
O ! <£
§ i <Q ; 52 m .t en~j ! CO O < 3Zr I to CMS • c co
—} C O C O —3 CO CO "3 -3-3 -3-3
inco coo) oo CM CM CM in co o) o>co cq >*> co oj '•P, 01 rr f>- -co *a; {Qo' in in'iri d d d d CD T-' d CM
CO .ts O)5 r inx?< ! e°
5|OlCOm
CO -3—3-3in co T- CM oo co CDCM ^ °J T °°. T N:
O O O O T- T-
« « # CQ * * *-3 CQ CQ = 5 - 3 — 3 — 300 CD CM CD m T- CDin 03 oq oj ^ Q ino d d o d d
i, • co CQ *^ co *i n o o - m c M T- CMCM CM coooO C M ^ * T } * O o o i n o c o
or
COor
ico
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! »ddddddo'dddddddddo'ddddddo'ddd
•5-5|fff ff §
ICO
,o> or'
2^Xp§toCO
II"01
OlCOin
SITE: RISKBURN
1
^ i- =5 5sC CO ff\ 5j*Z3 OJ Olor CM =
^* O vxc CO fft sfc3 CM OT 0>or •«- 3
1LH
?CLfENT SAMPLE IDs:
LABORATORY
SAMPI
MATRIX: *
UNITS:
-"j CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO COcococococococococococococo**! CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO COCDo
i_ COCO C~ E
CD A S£ ffi m » •>, >.
J_ S S S_ |_ 2 |
1 oi Illilflf II 12 c £i^ 9 O g Q e JN, co .is co •§
oO)COCO
—3
g00eo
cococococococococoCOCOCOCOCOCJ3COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCJ3COCOCO
CDi•53 CDE CD1 s » s
®g£"3§85g^| a.|2g2=-= B 2•5*9 |S54€i§•24. gv4cN S-o^CMCMCQlor'ilT-Zxf
CO%
CDg1
1
f
CO CO CO CO CO CO COCO CO CO CO CO CO COCO CO CO CO CO CO CO
. 0)
0 1
4-Chloro-3-njethylphen
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentad
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitr
oanili
ne
• •
CO CO CO COCO CO CO COCO CO CO CO
Dimethylphthalate
Acenaphthylene
3-Nitr
oanili
neAcenaphthene
AR3|i*i*28
S : !O i i~ > ! - 3 - 3 o r
co ~ ro— C ..< = 01CO"3u ;> or co 3
- < '2*5 X |goco
oi o
or <01
iool
O O CDCM CM CD••I- O
- 3 - 3 -3 or ">O O O O CM
O T- CD CDCD T- CO
—3—3—3—3—3—3333333
inS 8
"COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOcocococococococococococ^cocococococococococococococococococ^. • /vt An r\ / rt «vS ff\ m i*r\ m rr\ rr\ sn fr\ *>f\ *v\ *>r\ **\ 0>f\ ** *** »«* *« *MK «v «v\ «v* *w"i «v *w< >v> ~ ~ ^CDO
orm•COor
CO
i8Q.
Oo
AR3 11*1*29
i
cif
(— CM := OJ
« § * i« §»
|Pf
IP!co or 3m
co
—iCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOC^COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO-Jcococortcocococococococococococococococococopjc»5coeoc'ococococococococo^cococococococortcocowcococ^cococ^cocococococococococococococococococoCOQ
.- CD c ®CD C - ~
orcotooroi _ _ _
o
fc E |j- CJJ Cg CD § -g, _ E "s= c: C e 5. Q. — -" _ R c - o C : c £ E c :«£. coco co o PCD 2 s^oc .S-^cofDgj^Q) _^_ c c _ c - ci_ 9. g g Jg^ • "Sslo-^-CTO J
O Q-£ 2 •y £ O. O^1 g-g-g<-gl«^
O
AR3|l*l*30
UPao 5or <01
5O
COin
2 ! c °° 3 I
1 ! * iI ' !Q 1— CM = O)Tf o v;
|S<*tor
CM CM ~ O)= CM CO = CM §>
T- CM = O5§ CM CO -^or "" 3
1
0:3
-3
* CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO fjoocococococococococococococococococococooocococooococ^^cocococococococococococococococococococococococOcococOcoco8
£Ol
si01 COSfc
co ip
orm52 cob ..IZ h-r? X ..ZoE toiy§b tij <• < 2
O -J 2 3
lco o 4oeM~eM~a4o.4'»"24xo-a.<aEa.caw"mcQOQa3camJ=meMCM 2
AR3|l*l*3l
5CO
.•z. <OD
82D i <e m
CO01CL
or
COE
55
gg*9ISIIu.
D •» .fc o>< o < aisS c^igU-S
o:
or or
or or
^jooooo'oooo'oooocoO
LQUJail-S_ ^^2QQQQi.§w=paapooE£as
3CO
>- <b=?^UJa
COOlQ.in
gS.N5cob- • or js
£<or orco in .t o>
ro S < 3
I x-1 5°,i E^
O t .<=. o>§S<3
or
en i or org< "
ininininininininininininin
orm
S ! fiSij =wt ..Sgie_j < <to5s
g'O
AR3 1 1*1*33
ICO
O
a ttCO to »•-.
orm
o
TO
I1 £ in .h= O)
CO : .g01
1 CO .fc O)8< =
: IIO.
CM
*»HI Q
*i2 -°or r~.<±>t~ r? iS • •ffigpei§i~<2
or or
^jininininininininininininin.jdddo'dddddddddCDO
oz|
CO O_i5Z) IO <"COO)' :'CM'T):'T(:'UJOIOIOIX 11,1.31,I >4 4 O 4
Herbicide Analysis Data Review Data Table. Risk Burn 1, 9 June 1997.
7/23/97
AR3|l*l*35
UJ \ J> 01 COcoP
1
v-
SITE: RISKBURN
CO
>,U_
1E|oCO
1—— T- T; °>co in (S c Di °>§ CO 3or
«m=5J5>CO J c/j — = co I5or
1P|or CM §'
Icfi^1ds g>
= §ltc?'SWt
CM Q « O>E " CO 3 CM cj^QL CM 13
~ O 'Q &3CMOT1,or -^ 3
toQ :
CLIENT SAMPLE 1
LABORATORY
IDs
MATRIX:
UNITS:
3333333333
3=^ mco coa> oCM °°
-j m m3 -3 .rf CMCM TfCO m
JSFJ mJO CJ><R inCM 1
g _i m -3 co i* gSo r-- CM
Is- CO !*•^" CP ^
3-icD-.o 33h- T- OO COQ CO CD h-0> 4 CM **
2 -1 CQ CO 33T- in o inin a> co (£jCM CO 00
S> __5r ». »n CD CD O Og)in incoco.._in.oo
QS
0 Q.Z 93 B ai 09 in 5 ||i gc^o:O 4. 4 •* TT To .9 .9 .5 0 0O cMCMCM'cMOQOQ«E2
3 3
•z.
—>
3
§0CO•*t eo
-5 -3
gg
S S
-,-,o oCO N.
«l
|
1
AR3|l*l*36
Metal Analysis Data Report Data Tables, Risk Burn 1, June 9,1997.
7/23/97
AR3|i*l*37
or<
3CO
. O to
co .fc o> CO CD CQ CO CQ CQ CQ CQ CO CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CO CQ.— >r^ CM CM <? 3 •*cqa>T-ojh-CMO>'«-cMio r-.T-coeocoT-oincoco coyj^Q 3 (», j,, d in o' d CD CD in oi -r T *3- CMCD^-'3-T^irioicoTjN; •jg5 S*£ °- T " T ~ m CM CM O T- r«- T-O5 °° •t i=.•t CM I •<- CO CM CO CO•J- B OJ ! ^ C£if i - €O uJ«? i -J
>2 2 i. m m m OQ m CQ CD m m -3 CQ -3 m CD CQ CQ m m m CQ j
CMCM OCOOC»CDN.^-CD inCMOOinoOOO5Tj.h-OOOCM^ • m T-CO o o ^ - c M T - o o ' T - ^ - i n u CO.° ° A - { 2CM j "- " " C M
SJ o,!. "^ ~ 3 ^S " ^ " 5 "->
CQ CD CO CD CQ CQ CD CQ CQ CD CQ CQ CQ ft 03 CD CD CD CDfNir3:)?§> ! ffloiincDh-CM'-f- t«-T- ^-rocococRcoT-^r-o't^RitM^ ! o°oooocot-ino TJ-O eoh-cocMoo-xcocococo™™ i irid^cbosirioo oo'» fi4cowoo<^2dN:±: i in TCO ^ 0 1 , - t » ^ .
- 3 - 3 -> -3-3 - 3 - 3 £.2-3 CO CQ 00 CD m ~3 CQ -) CQ CO CQ OQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CO CQ CQ =5 fg
~c rfii , rf^oorro)O)N.cococMin inooco in'rr in co co co CM g t:
^ 01 "" *" CM'"'' CM i>- ® T- 5g
_O co
' "«, 3 CDU.a.a.Q.Q.LLrSQ.a.Q.Q.U.a.Q.CLQ.a.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q. OT£
CO i 'j=£P ;.- '! g 3
LU Q
1UJ "J m I— "~^ !j 7 'O tf3^b"rB_^roCO~CJ'£t.-£3'~*':**uu'cfn'm55 o5 53 !o <tncaOofj52coto<<oocSJ55
to
z E o S o|w 2 -ME!-!! r-sl.ili^fc lilel 18P-t" lit C^==e£__nCBC:jr;-=e:.3-— UJ C D > t 0 3 m & m
b2m
33CQ33CQ3-3lco N. <S d •«- co CD'• C Tf ±i O5 "*" CO O3 CM 5 => *" ^ lt~i or« 5
o;•S' —3—3-0—3-0-3-3S 33CQ33CQ3-3. '01 K. 03 d •<- 05 CD
om' -3 —> ~> ~~> -3 -3J 3-3ED33CQ3-3"*~ N- co d . oim co o
5 ®
m mCMOJd CMOCJJT-;^ COCO
CM§= S^oS^o? CM"?«5 , co J5
1 CQcoa3=f i COCON:'<- ^-cqJS! "co §* codecs oi pjcM en CM
£85 ;<H '01 «J fe
Z CQO CQF=3. < KOQO
~"-< Q ;52 : > z jo
-)CQ CQ
>,<*(n>^Sni
o >; i *co S
lcsj •<- co d ! •* 5 oo o cor 3i o r c M $ = i - •» «
-- tedc *<r3 CMCD
co co co
00 COCOo. -5i= i -
aioq in cq cci
'f1
T"
or ,3CQ ,CO 1
?!
COQ
_lQ.
CO^
CO
ore^o E co
CL
O
3g
5 T- T- Oi 0 TT
Q. U. Q. LL Q. U.
_ c=.-ii-iir
00
U-
t
• z
oCO"S"8Sm
co l l
Pesticide/PCB Analyses Data Report Data Table. Risk Burn 1,10 June 1997
7/23/97
co CD CM CM
.
•fg CD iy g' to in o> N. co inil-C-5 ! CMCO^00.^".IJ* g 000
im |' CO CD CD CD CO CD
"^tnSPP5 m m csj co co CM CDi c o ^ = N- in O5 3~ f*-- <o N-M ro. °.
CQ CQ CQi g l p , cn co co co T-; ir> co5 ' CMCDt-5mCDT-
CQ CQ CQ
2 e I q —: co g, CM r csCM •* T- CM 3o
or< . CO CQ CQ
2 !^PIC! wcoScoffi?COzoo
_ CMCMTtCO^-CDCMCOCOT-
>-te5 ! cxic3ciB™'''^rS52'':«S IroCQ
S — 3CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ OQ CQ
o5 rr:*_.1:^3'O«nCMO_JCM
2 ' T O ' ! S m m S CQ m m m2 ' CO|c2ci5i§P) ' coTreocpojoocor^oom
CQ CQ CO CQ'CQ CO CO CO CQI CM ~ ~
l6--
CO CO CQ CO CD CD CD CQ CD!•*- h- Sg g ! ^cooor-^incMineocMlicol ' £! in co CD oj r^ CD CD ooIQ- co °' °
05Q CO
m ,« iQL
•Z o E CO CLb !!j *r < zCO
_J<<Z IO o._.= -5a3cD c t3 o CB fi D Q I I ! 102153 10 SQK^Q-IIOZQ Hr\J|«4q.t|
Dioxin/Furan Data Validation Data Tables. Risk Burn 1,16 June 1997.
7/23/97
AR3'|i*l*l*2
1 « 1 * «i CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CO CQ CO CO CQ CO CQ CQ CQ CO CQ CQ CQ CQ CO CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CO
rn .£ co 31 oj C" O> ' •»-T-cococD*-*-cocoa5CM'«-i*s-'*incMh- CD'-r-cO'r-i-r-.incoinr-CO — ^rom1- T-OOOOTTCO'<-OOO'<-'<-Oh-OCD COO^TCOCOCON-gjCD
Z i± LL $2 ? ==• °. dPP0. P^PPPdPPP0. dP P d P P ••-. P P P P PO in °' ddddo'ddd o'do'o" d d o'o'dddddd
9>tCJJ^inCftCO'r'CMinincpCpCMOS^.lftCpCM T^
CO >- 5 S CM CM<• 2 2 ^ co co-J<co I
ort2co
1 . iilil5? D f co coO gcMCMO ^ CM CM
or it c t: sQ-gco
cocor-incnrocococMCMo. o- p p p i- co p p p q p o. o- CM p ,-; S; en CM co •* co ,-j •<*: o-d dddo'ddddddo' do do dodo' d
CQ CQ CQ CO CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CO CQ CQ CQ CD CQ
pCMCMTt-incoe»cocp'*-cococoT-ocMO p trO)t^o>'«-Tjodddddddo'dddddddd *~ do do d
$ CM CMS v- -
or i
S iiCO I «5E IxSe !£3t- j 3 < 111co i or 2 u.
CD CD CQ CD CD CD CO CO
cococp^coeoocNicMh^h^coT-cooom in,_:tDcpocDco,_:inooooo oo oooooooooo o o
.A R 3 IoSxo-OoUJXQ.O
O. I X OOoO I-
>- o5 .5 .S Pi ,§!«§•3 LU -C S
1 CO CO CO J5 CD
« l B" .£ CM "»• P5
0.<r- ' '-"'-;s c
CO CD CD CQ CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD COCD co co co 05 co ^ ~ CD co in N- co 05 *<—i C3 < f CM co f— " ~ co * in * f ™ «p pppp CD p p p pop CD OOOdo'o'ddd d d d dddd odd
*"§§ ' ~ ICO i gr . "o
CD CD CD CO CD CQ CQ CD CO CD CD cjp p CD cD CQ PCI |CMTj-COi-^- COf^CDCOTj- CM ^-CDT-CD T-TJ-..OOOCOO5 OOOOCM CM ^pO5O CMCMCMoooooin ooooo o o,-; in o ooo
E"S I oooooo ooooo o o oo ooo
O < O '•LU z < SJ _ i co co CQ co m CQ com mmm m m m m CQ en m mh-co-^cOT-cococo oo CD CM h-cot^coosN-incMoooocot oo o eo TJ- Odin's- — •-•c or
05CO
. fc CM CO yjr-in1-QT gCMCD
CM CD- CD
CO
§o o co Tf o •«- in *a- _- — ,p p p p p p p CD ppppdddddd d o o d d dddd dddd
X !g io | |
X I CQ CQ CQ CD CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ05
d dddd d odd dddd oddJ3
! *1
CD lOI^CMCO 00 CON-I^ CD T- in CO OO in N.o o o co o o CN o co o> CM in o ^- co coO O O O CD O OOO OOOCD OOO
ffl
"co or2ELu3
O u. u.QDQQ ii it ii ti Q Q
5 O CL CO CO O> h» oO-0_CDCOCOCbN-CO^j f* _L - "• .^" ? f-T t— ~L L " " " ^ ^ *T ^ QO p*. f 00 CD t~ OO GO P"» r » R*> 00 CO P*»
goqooooopaO cr> CM" CM" CM" CM" O «" CM" en CM" CM" « CM" CM" CM" O o Ul X 0. O u LU X Q. OO CM"T-"T-"T-~I-~T-"O CM* T-" CM~ T-" T-" CM "-" T-" T-" O ^I-CU I I Q H.Q. X 3C O
IL
CQ CD CO CO CO CD CD CO CD CQ CO CD CO CD CO CO CD CDf Cft in v™ CD *P~ CO CM J1 CO T™ *r** f {Q " J* if) CD CO CM CO CD CO CM CO v™ CO CO
do'" ~ do'" dd° *" ""*" ^
§^S^ °gS28 g
co m m co co CQ m CQ m m m m m
" T-COT- CO "^ v- CM CO CM Ot-CMT- CO CO CM CM T-o o
J-3-3-3-3-3-3 -3—3—3CQCQCQmmcQCQmcQ CQ mmm2 c J2^2 3 CM _ - _ _ _ _ _CO C£ E " g £' ! 0-1» "- ~"~o"'~''~ddd1"d'Z S5
ill ;oUJor3 : c co CO
I ! <§!"<P1 «
comgT3 CO
CD
orLU
*- Ior 1CO
COELUfc ! S^LU 5zCO K2EUJ3
CD PQ CD "™3 "™ ^ QQ Q2 CD CD CO CO CD CO CO CD
O CM tf j «J CO rr CD[If) CE|p CO CM CO xj CO
d ^ *~ * d'~'~0'~dind'~ ^
m CQ m —3 -^ -^ m m CQ m m m m m co m co co m
.O O O O
o) o> in in in ITS r- cocMCTst--cD'»-coTj-cM T-o5CMTrCOOOCOO5 CDt»-<<irOb»1«-CO_JO5 COTl-oJiqeoN-.^^^ incDoqr^os^^^^j m.cooooo ooooo oo
LLU.U.U-C3Q
AR3|l*l*i*5
•"S °pfe it « -S2LL U. LL U- " X a>cn
LLLLQQDQyy "CD^•o
, CLcoooenNT Q CL CL co co co e5\i>Teo •§•OOt^^OOtOhrCOOOh^^^OOtDh^ .».'
O co" CM CM" CM CM CM O t»i" CM" co CM CM eo" CM" CM CM o o LU X O. O o LU X D. O inO cM'T-'T-'f-'T-'-'OeM'T-'cM'T-'T-'cM'f-'t-'-'O i-D.XXOH-a.XXO «S
1
,J>.CO CDU CO
*S *op OD 03 CD 03 CQ CQ CD GD fl CD CD pQ CD CD
inTrcOCMCDCMCMT-CDCOCDr^TCMCDC3>T- COCMN-CMCM^-r-OJCOT-- s s - s - t e f c ' ^ *§or
o o d o d
ft\ CQ CQ CO f*n CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ OQ CQ CQ CQ CO CQ
o co .-j ,_: —•cooocof-r*.T|.'<j-ini»-•""I COT-T-CMT-Of:'.-:T-:0Q0}lf?C005. -<tC3 CO CD CO C?
rrt»-CMCO •^•COCOCOOOCOCMin<«S'CO« s r -
I|o UJ
I D u- LL '•« .2Z i QQOQ LL LL LL LL Q Q ' „,„ormcotz
QDQO LLU.OQQQOO CD =LU Q r<QO^^^5yryO^£^^^55 -^£OQ —3 X D O
o'£ooeo.d>.N- oO-GLcoeoeocnKco" i "gt- CO h-" N-" 03 CO" I- CO 00 N." NT N." CD to" N." _ _ m "C(D o-_._>.>QCBi^>^''V(D(D^*r*V|t _. S js! n o ftorSii- -^ o.
2 N>f*5COC'3<lOC'jQf«-C'>'l^COC'5'CfC'5Cl5COQ QOCJCjOQOOOQ Xt?
co i SSEES 8 S5S3328SSS33SSSS8 ^S^^B^S^^B r«A.R3UUU6
Chloride Analyses Data Table, Risk Burn 1,17 June 1997.
7/23/97
AR3|l*i*l*7
i ci or'iii
m«>d
i *
in*—d
xoagSe
ormCOELU
CO
CMC
or
_
P|*c=or
cor
RUN NUMBER:
SAMPLE
ID:
MATRIX:
UNITS:
10>pQ
O.
COMPOUND:
Chloride
Chromium Analyses Data Report Data Tables. Risk Burn 1,17 June 1997.
7/23/97
.2 t_"5 O CB
COI£ O) 05 =
PICO
Ior i CDI ! Ilff3 5N5CO CMZ cnLU Q
QZJ2$"Si I u-
! 1
aor3 o5 \ 5-01§g ! |
0)
O O> 'CO -SS
J3°o
orco , ...
i >3 ECO
or
_02 -g?®i i |ife^ P n COf £ to co00 s= S£
f
CO
SiQ 1325—LuOZ im co
o zUJ<ors3
Ooro
or :3x.COorujg
ofLU ..m QILUX-i$EiSclli CO
MPOUND
Chromium
VI
•*«»JI5
If the
field
left
was n
ot de
tec
than
or eq
ual i
AR3|i*i*5 I
3CO
Q. bLTJnII
-or<o z
O ^SDC : CQX i 2O co
XCM o =!
m205
CM
O0.
or3CO
COorLU
CO
i'• ofi LU ..: m 9' " _j *
i if^lii or w S 3
ozoD.
10
16
AR3il*l*52