us army corps of engineers building strong ® restoration and regulation discussion joseph p. davia...
TRANSCRIPT
US Army Corps of Engineers
BUILDING STRONG®
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Joseph P. DaVia
US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore
Chief, Maryland Section Northern
March 12, 2013
BUILDING STRONG®
2
Presentation Overview
Coordination with MDE
Types of Department of the Army (DA) permits
Issues & Challenges
Actions to Improve the Permit Process
BUILDING STRONG®
Baltimore District Regulatory Boundaries
BUILDING STRONG®
4
Clean Water Act Section 404
Permit required from the Corps to discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the US
Stream restoration, TMDL, or SWM projects in perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral streams, and jurisdictional wetlands: DA permit required
Corps level of involvement in project review is commensurate with the degree of impact
BUILDING STRONG®
Clean Water Act Section 404
Alternatives analysis is the centerpiece of the 404 review
Identify the practicable alternative which has the least adverse impact on the aquatic ecosystem (e.g., wetland/waters)
Practicable means available and capable of being done taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project purposes
Two part test: 404 and Corps public interest review
BUILDING STRONG®
Coordination with MDE Joint Federal/State permit process
►Coordinated project reviews►Office/field meetings►Public notice►Joint Evaluation Meetings in Annapolis►Public hearings►Consistent permit decisions and conditions
BUILDING STRONG®
Coordination with MDE
MDE morning presentations
►Purpose and need
►Alternative analysis
►Documentation requirements
BUILDING STRONG®
Types of DA Permits
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Department of the Army Maryland State Programmatic General Permit (MDSPGP-4)
Standard Permits
BUILDING STRONG®
NWP 27 - Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Establishment, & Enhancement Activities
No acreage limit, but the terms limit the types of activities authorized
Activities must result in net increase in aquatic resource functions and services
Coordination with NMFS on coastal plain streams (MD)
Coordination with other Agencies is optional (MD)
Other NWP 27 requirements for Pennsylvania
BUILDING STRONG®
NWP 27-Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Establishment, & Enhancement Activities
Applicant must demonstrate/document in the permit application and supporting info how the terms and conditions of the NWP are met, including how the project will achieve a net increase in aquatic resources functions and services over the existing conditions
Applicants required to coordinate w/SHPO, FWS, and appropriate State agency…See Regional Condition 31a.
Functions: physical, chemical, biological processes that occur in aquatic ecosystems
BUILDING STRONG®
NWP 27-Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Establishment, & Enhancement Activities
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) required for all NWP 27 activities in the Baltimore District
Does not authorize conversion of a stream or wetlands to another aquatic habitat type, stream channelization, or the relocation or conversion of tidal waters, including tidal wetlands to other aquatic uses (e.g., conversion of tidal wetlands into open water impoundments)
BUILDING STRONG®
What is Causing Project Delay?
Incomplete permit applications
No alternatives analysis
Changes to stream hydrology (e.g., sediment transport reach to aggradation reach)
BUILDING STRONG®
What is Causing Project Delay?
Projects resulting in a change from palustrine forested wetlands, to palustrine emergent or scrub/shrub
Projects proposing the construction of berms, dams, or weirs across perennial streams, forested floodplains, and adjacent wetlands, to impound/retain water for stormwater management
BUILDING STRONG®
Actions
If practicable, move as far upstream in the watershed to avoid impacts to waters of the U.S.
Focus site selection on degraded systems, not on relatively stable streams with mature forested floodplains and adjacent wetlands
BUILDING STRONG®
Actions Corps developed a simple flow chart on the
permit application process
Corps is developing an information checklist for applicants seeking NWP 27 authorization
Outreach – such as this “venue”
Joint Federal/State permit application revisions
BUILDING STRONG®
Actions
Working with the EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office, EPA R3 Regulatory, and MDE to explore options for addressing concerns and improving the permit process
Applicants: Involve the agencies early in the planning process for your restoration project. Agencies are accessible for pre-application consultation
BUILDING STRONG®
Pre-Application Consultation
Agencies meet with the applicant in advance of a permit application
Agencies offer input at the planning stages of a project (field/office meeting)
Discuss documentation requirements and alternatives that should be evaluated
BUILDING STRONG®
Pre-Application Consultation
We can provide guidance and preliminary feedback regarding the regulatory feasibility, and potential suggestions on alternatives that could make the project more feasible
We can have a pre-app meetings for restoration projects proposed for grant funding
BUILDING STRONG®
Pre-Application Consultation
Maryland State Highway Administration TMDL projects
Evaluate potential TMDL projects (e.g., stream restoration) to discuss site selection and the permit process
BUILDING STRONG®
Pre-Application Consultation
Expedites the permit process
Cost and time savings to applicants
Before you invest time and resources, contact the Corps and/or MDE to schedule a pre-app meeting (both agencies need to be present)
BUILDING STRONG®
Pre-Application Consultation
Monthly Interagency Joint Evaluation (JE) Meetings in Annapolis, Maryland – 4th Wednesday of the month
Federal/State agencies participate in JE
Recurring meetings with MD counties [e.g., Baltimore, Anne Arundel, Harford, Allegany Stormwater Committee]. Your county?
BUILDING STRONG®
22