I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

US Air ForceCapital Investment Programs

1

Robert Gill, P.E.Office of the Air Force Civil Engineer

Facility Management DivisionHQ USAF/A7CF7 January, 2013

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Overview

Strategic Landscape

AF Priorities

AF Civil Engineer Organization

Funding Profiles

FY12/13 MILCON

MILCON Initiatives

Construction Acquisition

2

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e…In a Fiscally-Constrained Environment

Defense Strategic Guidance

“I do not believe that we have to choose between our national security and our fiscal security…We have made America safer, but we must not rest until we have made America safe—today and tomorrow.”

– Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, 20 Nov 12

Prevail in today’s wars

Deter and defeat aggression

Effectively operate in Cyberspace, Space, and across all domains

Maintain a safe and effective nuclear deterrent

Protect the homeland

Preserve the force…avoid hollowing out the force

3

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Air Force Priorities

Continue to Strengthen the Nuclear Enterprise

Partner With the Joint & Coalition Team to Win Today’s Fight

Develop and Care for Airmen & Their Families

Modernize Our Air and Space Inventories, Organizations and Training

Recapture Acquisition Excellence

Installations Underpin These Priorities and Contributions 4

Enduring Air Force Contributions Air & Space Superiority, Cyberspace Assurance Able to hold any target at risk Responsive intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance Able to rapidly move people and cargo anywhere in the world Command & Control to conduct operations rapidly, effectively, and efficiently

CSAF FocusWin the FightStrengthen the Team

Shape the Future

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Installations Enable Enduring Air Force Contributions

Installations Power projection platforms--

CONUS, OCONUS, expeditionary Enable air & space superiority Assure Cyberspace access Provide infrastructure necessary

to hold targets at risk anywhereacross the globe

Facilitate ISR exploitation Host robust C2 networks Build partnerships with allies &

developing nations by forwardbasing US forces

“Air bases are a determining factor in the success of air operations.The two-legged stool of men and planes would topple over without this equally important third leg.” General of the Air Force Henry H. “Hap” Arnold 5

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

AF Civil Engineer Priorities

Build Ready EngineersProvide more effective Civil Engineer expeditionary and emergency response and management capabilities to meet current and emerging Air Force and CCDR requirements.

Build Sustainable InstallationsDevelop sustainable installations by implementing asset management principles for built and natural assets.

Build Great LeadersOrganize, develop, enable, and retain a trained and capable Total Force Civil Engineer team ready to meet current and emergent mission requirements

Our “Proud Heritage”… to a “Promising Future”

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Housing

AF Civil EngineersPrimary Functions

7

Installation Engineering

Emergency Services Environmental and Energy

Expeditionary EngineeringCE Strategic Plan

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

$268B PRVNearly the GDP of Peru

10M Acres of LandTwice the size of

New Jersey

As of FY99/4

75,800 HomesArlington/Alexandria

Combined

69,500 Dorm Rooms1 ½ times Doubletree Hotels

Family Housing Air Force Installations Airfields

102 Million Square YardsCould pave a highway from

Philadelphia to Boston

Dormitories

Plant Replacement Value

626M Sq Ft of Buildings88 Microsoft Corporations

Facilities

8The Air Force Installation is a Force Enabler

AF Civil EngineersPhysical Plant Profile

8

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Offutt AFB

Tinker AFBAltus AFB

JB San Antonio (Lackland)

Scott AFB

Keesler AFB

Otis ANGB

Shaw AFB

Moody AFB

Tyndall AFB

JB Lewis‐McChord

Fairchild AFB

Beale AFB

Travis AFB

Vandenberg  AFBEdwards AFBLos Angeles AFB

March ARB

Nellis AFB

Luke AFB

Davis‐Monthan AFB

Kirtland AFB

Cannon AFB

Holloman AFB

Hill AFB

Mountain Home AFB

Malmstrom AFB

FE Warren AFB

Buckley AFB

USAF AcademySchriever AFB

Peterson AFB

Minot AFB

Grand Forks AFB

Ellsworth AFB

McConnell AFB

Vance AFB

Sheppard AFBDyess AFB

Goodfellow AFB

Laughlin AFBJB San Antonio (Randolph)

Whiteman AFB

Little Rock AFB

Barksdale AFB

Columbus AFB

Grissom ARB

Arnold AFB

Maxwell AFB

Wright Patterson AFB

Hanscom AFBWestover ARB

JB McGuire‐Dix‐LakehurstDover AFB

JB Langley‐Eustis

Seymour Johnson AFB

Pope AFB

JB CharlestonDobbins ARB

Robins  AFB

MacDill AFB

Patrick AFB

Eglin AFB

HurlburtField 

JB Andrews

Selfridge ANGB

JB Anacostia‐Bolling

Eielson AFB

JB Elmendorf‐Richardson 

Homestead ARB

9

Major AF InstallationsCONUS

Creech AFB

JB Pearl Harbor‐Hickam

McEntire JNGB

NAS JRB Fort Worth 

Rickenbacker ANGB

Stewart ANGBVolk Field ANGB

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 10

Major AF InstallatoinsUSAFE Locations

Sigonella

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 11

Major AF InstallationsPACAF Locations

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

0100200300400500600

FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16$M

(T

ota

l F

orc

e)

12

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

$M (T

otal

For

ce)

Operations & Maintenance Funding Profile

Facility Sustainment Restoration & Modernization

Environmental Quality

90% 90% 90% 93%80% 75% 77%

$M (T

otal

For

ce)

Facility Operations

PBFocus FundsMigration InMigration Out

73%73%

Funded to Compliance

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

-Dorms & Energy Focus Funds: FY10-15 -Airfield & Consolidation Focus Fund:

FY12 only

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

$M

(T

ota

l F

orc

e)

90% 99%91% 93%

83% 83% 83%96% 84%

80% Funding

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

$0M$500M

$1,000M$1,500M$2,000M$2,500M$3,000M$3,500M

08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

AF PB COCOM Support Congressional Adds Supp / OCO ARRA

Enacted + FY12 PB FY13 PB

MILCONFunding Profile (Total Force)

As of 21 Sept 2011; includes Blue TOA only

13

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

050

100150200250300350400

47%

32%

9%

11%

P&D * $18.6M P-341 $18.2M

F-22 Mission Facilities $14.8M Operations / Training / Support $57.7M

F-35 Mission Facilities $13.5M HC/C-130 Facilities $38.6M

B-52 Facilities $4.6M

Air Force Permanent Party Dorms $42.5M

Develop and Care for Airmen and Their Families $42.5M

STRATCOM Replacement Fac - Incr 2 $161.0M MQ-9 Mission Facilities $25.0M

Partner with the Joint and Coalition Team to Win Today’s Fight $186.0M

Continue to Strengthen the Nuclear Enterprise $4.6M

Modernize our Air, Space, & Cyberspace Inventories, Orgs &Trng $124.6M

Must Pay $36.8M$M

FY13 MILCON Requirements $394.5M

14

1%

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

FY13 MILCONProjects

15

STATE BASE TITLEPROGRAM COST

($000)GEORGIA FORT STEWART AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS CENTER 7250NORTH DAKOTA MINOT B‐52 Add/Alter Munitions AGE Facility 4600ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK C‐130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR ADDITION 4178ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK C‐130J FUEL SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE HANGAR 26000GREENLAND THULE DORMITORY (48 PN) 24500TEXAS LACKLAND DORMITORY (96 RM) 18000ITALY AVIANO F‐16 MISSION TRAINING CENTER 9400FLORIDA TYNDALL F‐22 ADD/ALT HANGAR FOR LOW OBSERVABLE/COMPOSITE REPAIR 14750UTAH HILL F‐35 ADAL Building 118 for Flight Simulator 4000UTAH HILL F‐35 ADAL HANGAR 45W/AMU 7250UTAH HILL F‐35A Modular Storage Magazines 2280GEORGIA MOODY HC‐130J SIMULATOR FACILITY 8500NEW MEXICO HOLLOMAN MQ‐9 MAINTENANCE HANGAR 25000UNKNOWN WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED SANITARY SEWER LIFT/PUMP STATION 2000NEBRASKA OFFUTT STRATCOM Replacement Fac ‐ Incr 2 161000GREENLAND THULE Thule Consolidation 1 39000

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

“Deliberate pause" in FY13 MILCON investment Force structure adjustments under review - awaiting final

decisions Continued investment at minimum levels

Prevents mission stoppage Places highest priority on new mission bed down (e.g., F-35, F-22, MQ-9) Maintains incrementally funded projects supporting COCOM priorities

(e.g., STRATCOM, PACOM) Planning and Design scaled appropriately

Mitigation measures Sustainment maintained at 80% of FSM in FY13 Impacts to R&M accounts minimized

FY13 MILCONInvestment Strategy

16

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

MILCON InitiativesCost Reduction

MILCON “Process” IPT (CM): Portfolio Approach to MILCON Planning & Programming Project Definition Acquisition Strategy Project Management Submittal Review & Approval Configuration Control

MILCON “Product” IPT (TD): Govt vs. Commercial Costs Legal / Regulatory Cost Drivers AT/FP Cost Drivers UFC, Design Guide Review Weapon System FRD Development Type II vs. Type V Construction Elmendorf After Action Report Lessons

Schedule 12 Aug – Finalize IPT CONOPS Aug/Sep – Meet w/ USACE, NAVFAC 30 Sep – Draft Findings/Recommendations 15 Dec – Brief POAM to AFCEE/CL 30 Dec – Brief POAM to AF/A7C Nov/Dec – Brief 2-Star Interface

AF/A7C: “Achieve 25% Reduction in MILCON Costs”

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

MILCON Initiatives Process Improvement

Project Control: Project Management Playbook HAF-AFCEE MILCON Management Plan AFCEE Change Control Plan A7C Cost Control Policy Memo NexGen IT Configuration (Tririga)

AF-Agent InterfacesBIM-Tririga Interface

Strategic Communication: Annual AFCEE, Agent & MAJCOM PMRs Leadership for Execution, Awards and

Partnership (LEAP) Weekly Activity Report

Performance Measurement: PDRI

Tri-Service Ribbon Cutter Metrics

Composite Balanced Scorecard

Deliver Disciplined Execution…Every Time

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

MILCON Initiatives Standardization

Standard RFPs: Child Dev Centers Security Forces Operations Permanent Party Dorms Fire Stations Fitness Centers Medium Body Aircraft – Hangar/Backshops Medium Body Aircraft – Squad Ops/AMU

Standard BIM Dynamic Prototypes: Building blocks for major facility types

Developing in parallel with Std RFPs

From D-B to “Adapt-Build” and “BIM-Build”

Standardized Project Definition: Standard Design Instructions Emphasis on project definition Robust site characterization efforts Minimize surprises

Reduce County Options…Get the Jump on Projects

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

AFCEE Initiatives FY12/13 BIM-Build Projects

FY Agent Base Project TitlePA ($000) per 

DD1391

Estimated Completion 

Date Current Status

2012 Seattle FairchildWing 

Headquarters$13,600,000 30‐Sep‐12

Initial draft RFP review meeting complete

2013 MobileCape 

Canaveral

Range Communications 

Facility$20,000,000 30‐Sep‐13 RFP design kick‐off meeting 

complete

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

AFCEC InitiativesFY12 Standardization

Project Title Std‐RFP DP/Std Dsgn*

CriteriaDoc

AF Corporate Facilities Standards Mar‐13Security Forces Operations Facility  Mar‐13 Done  DoneMilitary Working Dog Kennel  Dec‐13 Jun‐13 w/DPDormitory Done Done DG DoneFitness Center Mar‐13 Done Update Sep‐13Visiting Quarters Mar‐13 Done UFC DoneFire Station Mar‐13 Mar‐13 UFC DoneChild Development Center  Done Done Sep‐13KC‐46 Squad Ops / Life Support / AMU  Mar‐13 Done DoneKC‐46 Hangars (3 types: MX, Fuel, Corrosion)  Mar‐13 Done DoneKC‐46 Flight Simulator  Mar‐13 Done DoneKC‐46 Fuselage/Boom Operator Trainer  Mar‐13 Done Done

21

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

AFCEC InitiativesFY13 Standardization

Project Title Std‐RFP DP/Std Dsgn

CriteriaDoc

Administrative Facility  Sep‐13 Sep‐13 UFC DoneAir Traffic Control Tower / RAPCON  Sep‐13 Sep‐13 Mar‐13Civil Engineer Squadron Facility  Sep‐13 Sep‐13Consolidated Communications Facility  Sep‐13 Sep‐13UAS ‐ Squadron Operations Facility  Sep‐13 Sep‐13UAS ‐Maintenance Hangar/Shops   Sep‐13 Sep‐13Fighter ‐Maintenance Hangar/Shops  Sep‐13 Sep‐13Fighter ‐ Engine Maintenance Facility   Sep‐13 Sep‐13AGE Maintenance/Storage Facility  Sep‐13 Sep‐13Supply Operations & Warehouse  Sep‐13 Sep‐13Wing Intel / SCIF Facility  Sep‐13 Sep‐13Confinement Facility  Sep‐13 Sep‐13Visitor Control Center  Sep‐13 Sep‐13Vehicle Search Facility  Sep‐13 Sep‐13

FY13 STATUS: All project SOWs complete, awaiting AE fee estimates

22

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

AFCEC InitiativesFY14 Standardization Projected

Project Title Std‐RFP DP/Std Dsgn

CriteriaDoc

Vehicle Maintenance Facility  Sep‐14 Sep‐14GOV Fuel Station & POL Operations  Sep‐14 Sep‐14Consolidated Mission Support Facility  Sep‐14 Sep‐14Munitions Storage Facility  Sep‐14 Sep‐14Munitions Maintenance Facility  Sep‐14 Sep‐14AMC Passenger Terminal  Sep‐14 Sep‐14 AMC Guide DoneAMC Freight Terminal  Sep‐14 Sep‐14AETC Technical Training Facility  Sep‐14 Sep‐14AETC Flying Training Facility  Sep‐14 Sep‐14Chapel Facility  Sep‐14 Sep‐14 Update FC Sep‐14Community Center  Sep‐14 Sep‐14Youth / Teen Center  Sep‐14 Sep‐14 UFC Done

23

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

MILCON Initiatives Energy Leadership

Add Value to Projects…Cost Effectively

MILCON Energy Mandates: Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005)

30% reduction over ASHRAE 90.1 (2007)

Energy Independence & Security Act, 2007 55% reduction in fossil fuel use by 2010

EO 13514 NetZero Buildings by 2030

New UFC consolidates Federal mandates and incorporates sections of ASHRAE 189.1

LEED Performance: FY09 LEED results… AF goal = 5% certified 46 Silver certification, 4 Gold certification 65% - eligible projects (50/76 projects)

FY10 LEED results AF goal = 10% certified 68 Silver certification, 5 Gold certification 100% - eligible projects (73/73 projects)

FY11+ LEED results…AF goal = 100% 100% - eligible projects

MILCON Energy Studies: FY 12: Analysis to achieve 40% reduction

5 Studies Building Envelope, Orientation, Renewables

FY13: Cost / Features to Achieve Net Zero 6 Studies Energy Generated = Energy Consumed Build on FY 12 Data; Rethink Building Process

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

EPAct 05Performance Assessment

EPAct Mandate: 30% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-2007 baseline Energy intensity redux…where Life-Cycle Cost effective

FY12 Performance – met goal

100% compliant with a 10 CFR 433

81% of projects met /exceeded 30%

19% achieved less than 30%...but maximized reduction while meeting requirement to be Life Cycle Cost effective

Most projects in this category are medical, industrial, or electronic intensive facilities (e.g., cyber, intel, C2)

2540-50% doable…beyond that RE…but not yet LCC effective

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

EISA 07Performance Assessment

EISA Mandate: 55% fossil fuel reduction by 2010 (2003 baseline)

65% by 2015; 80% by 2020; 90% by 2025; 100%by 2030

DOE to provide implementing guidance…none available yet

FY12 Performance – did not meet goal AF MILCON average = 32% reduction (ASHRAE 90.1)

Likely will need plant-level RE generation vs. “by-building” RE

Similar EO 13514 Mandate: Begin applying NetZero in 2020; fully NetZero by

20302640-50% doable…beyond that RE…but not yet LCC effective

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

LEEDPerformance Assessment

100% of the FY10+ eligible projects seeking formal LEED certification

88 AF LEED certified facilities to date: 1 Platinum 31 Gold

NDAA included prohibition on LEED Gold and Platinum certification of FY12 projects Future NDAAs may extend the prohibition AF will seek LEED Silver certification only

27

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Construction AcquisitionMILCON Agents

FY12 MILCON 98% USACE and NAVFAC*

2% AFCEC*

75% Design-Build vs. 25% Design-Bid-Build

*Based on dollar value including MFH, UK and CENTCOM Contingency Construction

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Construction AcquisitionContinued Acquisition Reform

Competition is still king

Increased emphasis on cost as driving factor

More focus on Low-priced Technically-Acceptable end of Best Value continuum

Increased emphasis on Small Business set asides

29

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Construction AcquisitionAFCEE Contract Toolbox

Worldwide Planning, Program, & Design 08 (4PA-E08) 5 year IDIQ…$3B capacity…22 Full Scope, 7 Reduced Scope

Global Engr, Integration & Tech Assistance (GEITA Bridge) 1 yr A&AS 2-3 month options…$200M capacity…3 F&O, 1 small firm

Heavy Engineering, Repair, and Construction (HERC) 5 year IDIQ…$6 - $15B capacity…15 (19) F&O, 4 (0)-8(a) firms

Environmental, Construction, Operations & Services (ECOS09) 100% Small Business set-aside 5 year IDIQ…$350M total…$95M services…10 Small firms

Worldwide Environ Restoration and Construction 09 (WERC09) 5 year IDIQ plus 3 years for PBC…$3B capacity…23 F&O, 16 small, 3-

8(a), 2 SDVOSB

30

F&O = Full and Open

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

31

Headquarters U.S. Air ForceI n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

31