urban modelling 1 03/2003 © crown copyright urban scale nwp with the met office's unified...
TRANSCRIPT
Urban Modelling 1 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Urban Scale NWP with the Met Office's Unified Model
Peter Clark
Mesoscale Modelling Group
Met Office
Joint Centre for Mesoscale Meteorology
University of Reading
Urban Modelling 2 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Why Mesoscale Models? Mesoscale variation of boundary layer structure due to:
– Changes in surface characteristics.
» Urban/rural
» Land/sea
» Soil moisture/surface temperature
– Orography.
Mesoscale flows induced by above.– Land/sea breeze.
– Drainage flows.
Mesoscale structure in synoptic meteorology– Fronts
– Convective storms
AirQuality
WeatherForecasting
Urban Modelling 3 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Why the Unified Model (UM)? Non-hydrostatic, fully compressible, deep atmosphere.
Suitable for use at very high spatial resolution. The UM surface exchange scheme treats urban areas and is being
improved.
Data assimilation is a powerful tool; makes UM data a major resource.
UM availability and improvements.– Available to and adopted by NERC community.
– Portable UM 5 released VERY soon.
– SLICE: A Semi-Lagrangian Inherently Conserving and Efficient scheme for transport problems
Operational Plans: – UK ~4 km 2005.
– 1 km ~2008-10 for v short range.
Urban Modelling 4 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Example results from High Resolution Trial Model
Visibility (m)
12 km 4 km 1 km
Urban Modelling 5 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Blending Height
Surface
UM Tile surface exchange Treats heterogeneous
surfaces using ‘blending height’ techniques.
Nine surface types, – Broad Leaf Trees – Needle Leaf Trees– C3 Grass– C4 Grass– Shrub– Urban– Water– Soil– Ice
Each tile has fixed characteristics.
4 layer soil temperature and moisture.
Urban Modelling 6 03/2003 © Crown copyright
s Ts4g Tg
4
H E s Ts4
G
RN
Urban Tiles Each tile has a full
surface energy balance. This includes a radiatively
coupled ‘canopy’. In the urban case this has high thermal inertia to simulate wall effects.
Work in progress (Reading) to improve representaion, especially of radiative effects.
Urban Modelling 7 03/2003 © Crown copyright
12 km
4 km
1 km
Model ConfigurationMet Office non-hydrostatic semi-implicit, semi-Lagrangian Unified Model, 38 levels on stretched height based terrain following grid.
One-way nested
–Global (~60km) 20 min timestep
–~12 km (146X182) 5 min timestep
–~4 km (300x300) 2 min timestep
–~1 km (300x300) 0.5 min timestep 12 km down to 1 km run from operational 3D VAR mesoscale analysis at 12Z 10th May 2001
Tiled land surface scheme using CEH 25 m Landsat based land-use including ‘urban’ fraction.
Model ignores man-made heat sources
Urban Modelling 8 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Example 1 km domain
Orography Urban Fractionin Land UseGrass Fractionin Land Use
Urban Modelling 9 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Formation of the night timeurban heat island
Light Wind
00Z 11/05/2001
Urban-No-Urban Near surface temperature difference
Urban Modelling 10 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Urban fraction
Point 1: 1 %
Point 2: 97 %
Point 3: 50 %
Point 4: 1 %
Urban Fraction and contours of Urban Impact on 20 m Temperature
1
23
4
0.5
1.0
1.5
00Z 11/05/2001
Urban Modelling 11 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Point 2
Point 3
Point 1
Point 4
Point 1: Upstream
Point 2: Central London
Point 3: Downstream Suburbs
Point 4: Downstream Rural
Evolution of vertical structure over London
Urban Modelling 12 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Impact on vertical mixing.
Urban Area produces 200 mnear neutral boundary layer
Central London
Urban Modelling 13 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Tracer release broadly reflecting smoothed emissions
Afternoon deep convection
brings down clean air
Night time stabilization
Blocking of flow by North Downs
Arbitrary Units
Predictable?
Unpredictable!
Urban Modelling 14 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Regional tropospheric data assimilation of
tracers/chemistry? Ambitious, but shouldn’t we be?
3D VAR stratospheric chemistry, tropospheric 'aerosol' already a reality.
DA discipline forces objective analysis of model error, observation error and representativity/covariance.
4D VAR of tracers has potential to improve model transport as well as provide concentration fields.
Tracer assimilation straightforward using model dynamics. Conceivable using alternative dispersion if incorporated into UM.
DARC
Urban Modelling 15 03/2003 © Crown copyright
Towards a Modelling Strategy Based on the Unified Model
Provision of higher resolution UM output to drive offline transport/dispersion (NAME + Others).
Use of UM in NERC community to validate/improve meteorology.
– Benefits of using operational analyses including sub-surface. Closer coupling of transport/chemistry with UM.
– Using UM transport OR alternative (NAME, parcel, Eulerian)– Consistent physics– Shorter updating interval for winds
Start thinking in a data assimilation framework– Model error covariances– Observation representativity defined with respect to model.
Eventual implementation of multiscale DA of quasi-conserved species.