urban mapping in gis

Upload: gianni-gorgoglione

Post on 02-Jun-2018

234 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    1/28

    URBAN MAPPINGHIGH-RESOLUTION SATELLITEIMAGERY &

    AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY (IKONOS 2 & AVIRIS)

    Gianni Gorgoglione

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    2/28

    Introduction

    SATELLITES & AIRBORNE

    IMPERVIOUS SURFACES ADVANTANGES & DISAVANTAGESATELLITE IMAGE PROCESSING

    RESULTSDISCUSSION/QUESTIONS

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    3/28

    IKONOS SATELLITE VS AIRBORNE

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    4/28

    HIGH-RESOLUTION SATELLITEIMAGERY

    Max panchromatic resolution of 0.5 m per pixel

    Max multispectral resolution of 4 m per pixelSwath width 13-70 km

    IKONOS 2 Swath -11 km 11 km (singlescene)Orbit Height 681-709 kmRevisit rate for IKONOS is 3 to 5 days off-nadir and 144 days for true-nadir

    https://earth.esa.int/web/guest/missions/3rd-party-missions/current-missions/ikonos-2

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    5/28

    AIRBORNE PHOTOGRAPHY

    AVIRISMaximum spatial resolution up to 2.5 cm per pixelER-2 jet or Twin Otter GRC airplanesflies at approximately 20 km above sea level (Er-2 jet)Whisk broom scanning

    http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/aviris/index.html

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    6/28

    AIRBORNE PHOTOGRAPHY

    AVIRISvisibility (on a clear day about 80km-100km)224 contiguous spectral channels (also called bands) with

    wavelengths from 400 to 2500 nanometers (nm) VIS-NIR-SWIR

    http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/aviris/index.html

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    7/28

    AIRBORNE PHOTOGRAPHY

    AVIRISER-2 (20km above the ground) each pixel produced by theinstrument covers an area approximately 20 meters

    diameter on the ground

    Ground swath about 11 kilometers wide

    http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/aviris/index.html

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    8/28

    AIRBORNE PHOTOGRAPHY

    AVIRISTwin Otter (4km above the ground), each ground pixel is 4m

    square, and the swath is 2km wide

    http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/aviris/index.html

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    9/28

    AIRBORNE PHOTOGRAPHY

    AVIRIS STORAGE CAPACITY

    140 Megabytes (MB) for every 512 scans (or lines) of data. Each512 line set of data is called a "scene", and corresponds to an area

    about 10km long on the ground A full AVIRIS disk can yield about 76 Gigabytes (GB) of data perday (Last Updated: October 30, 2007)

    http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/aviris/index.html

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    10/28

    AIRBORNE PHOTOGRAPHY

    AVIRISPHOTOGRAPHY EXAMPLE

    GULF COAST OIL SPILL 2010

    http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/aviris/index.html

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    11/28

    SATELLITE & AERIALPHOTOGRAPHY

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    12/28

    SATELLITE & AERIALPHOTOGRAPHY

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    13/28

    IMPERVIOUS SURFACES DEFINITION

    Any materials that water cannot infiltrate and is primarily associated with human activities andhabitation through construction of transportationand buildings

    (Slonecker 2001, Bauer 2004)

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    14/28

    IMPERVIOUS SURFACES

    Ikonos composite image

    Bright buildings roofs highreflectanceRoads or dark roofs lowreflectance (They absorb major part ofvisible light, near IR and shortwave IR)

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    15/28

    IMPERVIOUS SURFACES

    Different kind of roof material havedifferent reflectance

    Tiles, metal sheet roof, asphalt, wood,

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    16/28

    IMPERVIOUS SURFACES

    It could be more complicated!

    metal sheet roof

    More complicated?

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    17/28

    AIRBORNE PHOTOGRAPHY

    AVIRIS

    http://omsjena.geogr.uni-jena.de/~c5hema/pub/rse04_heroldetal.pdf

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    18/28

    ADVANTAGES & DISAVANTAGES

    Geometric Distortions of AerialMost of aerial photo provides aperspective view. Perspective

    views give a geometricallydistorted image of the Earthsurface. Distortion in aerialphotographs comes primarilyfrom two sources: camera tiltand terrain variation.

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    19/28

    ADVANTAGES & DISAVANTAGES

    Geometric Distortions of AerialGeometric distortion on anaerial photograph due to

    camera tilt

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    20/28

    ADVANTAGES & DISAVANTAGES

    Geometric Distortions of Aerial

    Geometric distortion on anaerial photograph due toterrain variation

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    21/28

    ADVANTAGES & DISAVANTAGES

    Geometric distortion on anaerial photograph due toterrain variation

    Advantages DisadvantagesMaximum spatial resolution up to 2.5 cm perpixel

    Need of bigger space storage

    Weather condition Airplanes can takephotographs where Satellite sensors cannot workproperly

    The aircraft body is tilted in order to take slantingpictures because position can vary

    Older archive of imagery collection from the past.While new satellite observations started in 1972

    Time consuming process. However, now moderncameras can capture strip of data and not only aframe.

    Easy maintenance for technical service

    Installation of multi spectral cameras that worksimultaneously

    Lower cost

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    22/28

    ADVANTAGES & DISAVANTAGES

    Geometric distortion on anaerial photograph due toterrain variation

    Advantages DisadvantagesPanchromatic images with a spatial resolutionof 1 m or better.

    Lower resolution than aerial photography.Maximum spatial resolution is circa 50 cm perpixel.

    Better opportunities for slanting observationthan perpendicular observation

    One critical step is to extract dark impervioussurface areas and shadowed impervioussurfaces, which are often confused with waterand shadows cast by tree crowns.

    Large coverage area, short revising time The tall buildings-cast shadows and treecrowns in the high spatial resolution imageryrepresent a problem for extracting impervioussurfaces. They look like water or wet lands.

    Speed. Location of satellite can move fasterthan aerial image. Satellite can take a largeramount of data that means less time.

    Weather condition can determinate the resultof satellite imagery

    Difficult to change cameras onboard

    Higher cost

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    23/28

    SATELLITE IMAGE PROCESSING

    DECISION TREE CLASSIFICATION

    METHOD (DTC) is a Algorithmic calculationwith purpose to classify and predictcategories from a set of trainingcases/objects and their attribute values

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    24/28

    Method applied on urban mapping from Ikonosimagary processing:

    1) Creation of 3 classifiers for 3 levels reflectance

    2) NDVI index to separate vegetation from Impervioussurfaces (IS)

    3) VIS for high and medium reflectance for IS,NIR for low reflectance for IS

    4) Unsupervised ISODATA classification (sinceDTC cannot detect clearly SHADOWS AND WATER

    SATELLITE IMAGE PROCESSING

    DTC

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    25/28

    SATELLITE IMAGE PROCESSING

    Figure from Lu, Dengsheng and Weng, Qihao(2009)'Extraction of urban impervioussurfaces from an IKONOS image',International Journal of Remote Sensing

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    26/28

    SATELLITE IMAGE PROCESSING

    a) Maximum Likelihood Classification MLC (b) DTC on IKONOS data

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    27/28

    RESULTS

    Most accurate method to extract impervioussurfaces is the combination of non-parametricdecision tree classification and unsupervisedISODATA classifier (Dengsheng Lu & Qihao Weng ,2009)Higher resolution and more flexibility of aerialphotography is still an advantage for urban

    mapping despite the higher cost Aerial photography and satellite imagery arecomplementary

  • 8/11/2019 Urban Mapping in Gis

    28/28

    Questions/Discussions

    The increasing of technology of digital camerasmake more complex decision above whichdevice is more suitable for imagery productiondepending on the circumstancesIs it really possible to decide a priori whichmethod is more accurate?