ura pch deployment ks 2013 rev pa6

122
URA_PCH Deployment recommendations and results

Upload: vickyparasar163

Post on 20-Dec-2015

49 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

a

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA_PCH

Deployment recommendations and results

Page 2: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 2

Content

› Network Data› Introduction› Feature characteristics› Dimensioning› Configuration› Monitoring

– URA FNI report– Report for the rest of RNCs

Page 3: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 3

Content

› Network Data› Introduction› Feature characteristics› Dimensioning› Configuration› Monitoring

– URA FNI report– Report for the rest of RNCs

Page 4: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 4

Network data

RNC LAC # of cells

RNC1 8 832

RNC2T 11 538

RNC3 7 848

RNC4 9 719

Page 5: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 5

Content

› Network Data› Introduction› Feature characteristics› Dimensioning› Configuration› Monitoring

– URA FNI report– Report for the rest of RNCs

Page 6: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 6

What is URA-PCH?

› Utran Registration Area – Paging CHannel

› New state between CELL_FACH and IDLE.

› Only applies to Packet Interactive RABs.

› PDR Connected state where RAB is established but user activity is zero

› UE does not use any radio resources. Just listens to the paging channel.

› Optional Feature - Customer requires license for this feature

CELL_FACH

URA_PCH

IDLE

Page 7: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 7

What is URA-PCH?

› Switch to URA_PCH @ inactivity on PS RAB for inactivityTimer sec (ChannelSwitching MO).

CELL_FACH

URA_PCH

IDLE

Page 8: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 8

What is URA-PCH?

› Switch to URA_PCH @ inactivity on PS RAB for inactivityTimer sec (ChannelSwitching MO).

› Switch from URA_PCH to CELL_FACH if activity resumes.

CELL_FACH

URA_PCH

IDLE

Page 9: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 9

What is URA-PCH?

› Switch to URA_PCH @ inactivity on PS RAB for inactivityTimer sec (ChannelSwitching MO).

› Switch from URA_PCH to CELL_FACH if activity resumes.

› Switch from URA_PCH to IDLE if inactivity persists for further inactivityTimerPch mins (ChannelSwitching MO). More information on timers is in the Configuration part of this presentation

CELL_FACH

URA_PCH

IDLE

Page 10: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 10

Content

› Network Data› Introduction› Feature characteristics› Dimensioning› Configuration› Monitoring

– URA FNI report– Report for the rest of RNCs

Page 11: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 11

Feature characteristics

› Can have 1URA/cell (max 2304/RNC)

› All cells in RNC can share the same URA

› One cell can have up to 4 distinct URAs

› URA over Iur isn’t supported

› URA won’t cross the RNC border

Page 12: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 12

URA_PCH state

› In URA_PCH the UE keeps its reserved User Plane IP-address and a signaling connection in the CN, but no radio resources.

› The benefits with the feature are twofold: – Minimized service reactivation time for UEs

using a PS interactive RAB; and,– Less signaling and power consumption in

the UE as compared to CELL_FACH.

› The state transitions to and from URA_PCH are illustrated on the diagram.

› As can be seen in the diagram, the URA_PCH state is reachable only by channel switching from CELL_FACH.

Page 13: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 13

HSPA

FACH

IDLE

URA

Much less signaling from URA than from Idle

URA -> FACH› Only 3 signaling

messages over Uu

FACH -> HSPA› Around 12 signaling

messages over Uu and Iub

Idle -> HSPA› Around 30 signaling

messages over Uu, Iub and Iu

signaling improvements with URA

Page 14: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 14

Content

› Network Data› Introduction› Feature characteristics› Dimensioning› Configuration› Monitoring

– URA FNI report– Report for the rest of RNCs

Page 15: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 15

Technical BackgroundPaging Strategy› The Paging Strategy is the way of minimizing the paging failure rate whilst not loading the

network with too many pages. › The paging strategy is implemented via paging parameters in MSC, SGSN and RNC.

› CN CS initiated paging– The paging strategy is implemented through MSC parameters.– The choice of paging strategy might be different for pooled and non-pooled MSC

solutions

› CN PS initiated paging– The timers and parameters in SGSN is the basis for the CN PS paging strategy.

› UTRAN initiates pages in the following cases:– When a UE in state URA_PCH then RNC initiates a channel switch to CELL_FACH

because it has data to send. – When a UE in state URA_PCH change state to IDLE due to expiry of the timer

inactivityTimerPch.– When System Information has been modified. The PICH is then set to ensure all UEs

read the PCH. › The System information needs to be broadcasted after an RNC restart and after

parameter changes.– The UTRAN initiated paging procedure is time supervised

Page 16: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 16

Technical BackgroundTime Supervision (UTRAN Initiated Paging Procedure)

› The RNC always repeats each paging message noOfPagingRecordTransm times, regardless of the response and regardless if congestion occurs.

› The default value of noOfPagingRecordTransm is 2. Hence, the paging message is re-transmitted twice.

› If there is no room in the paging message the RNC keeps a paging queue of five paging records per cell

› If the paging queue is full the next incoming paging record is discarded.

Page 17: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 17

Technical backgroundPaging structure

› Paging messages are mapped onto radio channels, and the records are coded into Paging Message Type 1 or Paging Message Type 2.

› Paging to UEs in IDLE and URA_PCH state is performed with Paging Message Type 1.

› As 3GPP standard (25.993, 34.108), the maximum payload size of SRB for PCCH (Paging Control Channel) is 240 bits.

› As a result, for each paging occasion, 240 bits of information can be handled.

Page 18: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 18

Technical backgroundPaging structure› Depending on the UE identity used (IMSI, TMSI, P-TMSI or U-RNTI), the

number of paging records per message can vary. The table below defines the UE identities and its payload size.

UE Identity Payload Size (bits)

IMSI 79

TMSI 47

P-TMSI 47

U-RNTI 47

240 bits

› As a result, the number of paging records per message could vary depending on the UE identity used. Typically 3 to 5 paging records.

IMSI IMSI IMSI IMSI IMSI

T/P

/U

T/P

/U

IMSI

T/P

/U

T/P

/U

T/P

/U

T/P

/U

T/P

/U

T/P

/U

T/P

/U

T/P

/U

Page 19: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 19

Technical backgroundDiscontinuous Reception

› Discontinuous reception (DRX) makes the UE (either in idle mode or in URA_PCH mode listen to the PICH only at certain predefined times.

› The setting of DRX cycle parameters will determine the time period between consecutive paging instances from RNC to a certain UE.

› The DRX cycle length can be set different for CN CS, CN PS and UTRAN initiated pages.

Page 20: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 20

LA RA URAConfiguration rules

› There are restrictions in an RNC. The maximum number of LAs, RAs and URAs in an RNC is 47, 154 and 2304 respectively.

› LAs and RAs are identified by their Location Area Identification (LAI) and Routing Area Identification (RAI).

› An LAI is defined in the MSC up to a maximum of 65534.› LAs, and the RAI consist of 8 bits, meaning maximum 256 RAs per LA.

› A cell can belong to up to 4 URAs. But from the RNC perspective a UE in state URA_PCH can only have one valid URA. If a UE is in a cell belonging to several URAs the RNC will assign one of them.

› When the UE in URA_PCH passes an RNC border and initiates a URA update, the RNC will answer with a RRC Connection Release message, and the UE is switched to IDLE. If LA/RA is changed during the connected time, an LA- and/or RA update is done.

Page 21: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 21

LA/RA/URA DimensioningOverview

› Dimensioning the number of cells in a LA is a trade-off between LA/RA/URA signaling load and Paging load.

› The corresponding considerations apply:–Large LA/RA/URA low signaling load but high paging ⇒

load.–Small LA/RA/URA high signaling load but low paging ⇒

load.

Page 22: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 22

LA/RA/URA DimensioningPaging Capacity

› Pages arriving at the RNC are Poisson distributed.› They are put into a queue with 3-5 paging records› If the queue is full, the page is discarded.

› The probability that a page arriving to the RNC is never sent out is approximated by the equation below.

Where

pcong is the probability that a paging record is rejected to be sent at its intended paging occasion (TTI)

m is the number of paging records per TTI in each cell

x is the number of paging records per paging message

N The largest value of x, that is N, can be 3, 4 or 5 (refer to slides 17-18) .

Page 23: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 23

LA/RA/URA DimensioningPaging Capacity

› The probability of congestion on PCH for:X =3,4,5 paging records per paging message type1

› Usually, PCH congestion probability higher than 1-2% is considered poor

Page 24: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 24

LA/RA/URA DimensioningPaging Capacity› Latest PLM info› PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

– It has been observed in some networks that the paging load has been increasing. This is especially due to the effects of Smartphones which can result in increased PS paging in the network even if the traffic volume has not increased.

– The intention of this PLM Info is to make markets aware of possible detrimental effects due to increased paging load.

– With default setting of Paging::noOfPagingRecordTransm (value = 2), it is recommended to start planning actions if the Qpaging_air_interface exceeds 100 paging records/s/cell.

– Immediate actions are needed if the paging load exceeds 130-150 paging records/s/cell.

› RISK– The RNC may enter "Recovery Mode" where it rejects traffic, and un-predictable

incidents may occur as the RNC enters an overload state. As a result, RNC performance may degrade significantly.

100 paging records/s/cell will be used in the dimensioning as the main criterium.

Page 25: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 25

LA/RA/URA Dimensioningmeasuring paging load

› The paging load in the RNC can be measured as follows:

Where:– = noOfPagingRecordTransm

– is the measurement time in sec

› The paging congestion in the RNC can be measured as follows:

CellsofNumbert

nAttemptTypepmNoPaging rep

__*

1Q _interfacepaging_air

%1001

rep

cong nAttemptTypepmNoPaging

jectedReanAttemptUtrpmNoPagingP

trepn

Page 26: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 26

LA/RA/URA Dimensioningestimating paging load increase

› To take full advantage of URA, it is recommended to combine activation of URA Handling Feature with a reduction of InactivityTimer (FACH -> URA) to 5 sec (current setting 20 sec).

– Details on the full recommended parameter set will be provided in the CONFIGURATION part of the document.

› It is expected that both URA Handling activation and reduction of the timer will bring significant Paging Load increase.

› Paging Load increase will be estimated using experience from the other networks with similar changes.

Page 27: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 27

LA/RA/URA Dimensioningestimating paging load increase

Paging Attempts, Type1

2,000,000,000

2,250,000,000

2,500,000,000

2,750,000,000

3,000,000,000

3,250,000,000

3,500,000,000

3,750,000,000

4,000,000,000

4,250,000,000

4,500,000,000

4,750,000,000

5,000,000,000

Time, [days]

[#]

Paging Attempts, Type1

URA + InactivityTimer (30 ->5 sec)

› InactivityTimer:– Reference NW: 30 -> 5 sec– EMT: 20 -> 5 sec

› Contribution to Paging Load increase:

– Timer change 80%– URA activation 20%

› Based on data above, expected worst case Paging Load Increase in EMT NW is:

Paging_Load_Increase = 80%

100 - 120%

Reference NW

Page 28: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 28

LA/RA/URA Dimensioningputting it all togetherModeling actual paging intencity using statistics counter data from the network:

› Statistical measurements show, that Paging Intensity in RNC1 is high to start with (>100 pages/s)› URA activation + timer change may bring Paging Intensity in RNC1 to an extreme level (>220 pages/s)› Even in case of homogeneous LA plan, an average Paging Intensity may exceed recommended level

of 100 pages/s› Actions need to be taken to mitigate high Paging Intensity

Variable RNC1 RNC2 RNC3 RNC4Network average(Even LA plan)

PS Paging Attempts, Type1, pmNoPagingType1Attempt , week 2 30,806,956,113 5,207,638,995 10,696,068,070 9,439,641,773 56,150,304,951# of congested pages, pmNoPagingAttemptUtranRejected 24,359 0 0 41 24,400

Paging.noOfPagingRecordTransm, # n rep 2 2 2 2 2

Average paging intensity, [pages] 61,613,912,226 10,415,277,990 21,392,136,140 18,879,283,546 112,300,609,902Measurement period, =1 week, [s] t 604,800 604,800 604,800 604,800 604,800Number of Cells, # 832 538 848 719 2,937

Measured paging intencity per cell and second, [pages/s] Q paging_air_interface 122 32 42 43 63Measured paging congestion, [%] P cong 0.00004% 0.00% 0.00% 0.0000002% 0.00002%Probability for paging congestion, [%] 0.17% 0.0001% 0.0005% 0.0006% 0.005%Predicted paging intencity per cell and second after URA activation, [pages/s] 221 58 75 78 114Probability for paging congestion after URA activation, [%] 2.55% 0.003% 0.01% 0.02% 0.12%

Page 29: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 29

Current LA/RA plan

Problem

Page 30: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 30

Options for LA/RA optimization

Option 1:Extend LA 11

Option 2:Split LA 8

Option3:Several RA/URA

Per LA 8

Page 31: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 31

LA/RA optimizationfurther details

Fraction of Paging types

0.000%

10.000%

20.000%

30.000%

40.000%

50.000%

60.000%

70.000%

80.000%

90.000%

100.000%

07-01-13 08-01-13 09-01-13 10-01-13 11-01-13

Date

%

Fraction of Global Fraction of MSC Fraction of SGSN

› Data from EMT NW:– Main contributor to

Paging Intensity is PS Domain Paging (90%)

› Based on data above, RA/URA split will bring the main reduction in Paging Intensity.

› Thus, one approach could be to have several RA/URA for LAC 8– Can be used if LA split is difficult

Page 32: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 32

LA/RA optimizationfurther details

Area split benefit

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

110%

1 2 3 4 5 6

Number of split areas

10% of Total Paging Volume

15% of Total Paging Volume

20% of Total Paging Volume

30% of Total Paging Volume

40% of Total Paging Volume

50% of Total Paging Volume

60% of Total Paging Volume

70% of Total Paging Volume

80% of Total Paging Volume

90% of Total Paging Volume

100% of Total Paging Volume

Having 3 RA/URA per LAC 8 will bring Paging Intensity down by 60% to an acceptable level of < 100 pages per second.

Page 33: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 33

LA/RA optimizationways forward

› Long-term solution– PS paging contributes to 90% of total Paging Intensity– Review paging settings in the Core Network– Re-design and split LA 8 into 3 RAa and URAs

› Can be combined with splitting LA 8 into more LAs as well, but the main benefit will come from RA/URA split

› Short term workaround– LA/RA Redesign is a tedious job. To speed-up URA roll-out for RNC1, the following

steps can be proposed:› Initially activate URA in RNC1 without changing InactivityTimer› Initially have several URAs for LAC 8 – URA is only defined within the WRAN, so

no configuration in the Core NW needed› As an emergency workaround use noOfPagingRecordTransm = 1. This will

reduce the Paging Intensity by 50%.

Page 34: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 34

Content

› Network Data› Introduction› Feature characteristics› Dimensioning› Configuration› Monitoring

– URA FNI report– Report for the rest of RNCs

Page 35: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 35

URA-PCHWRAN pre-requisites

› UTRAN Registration Area Handling requires– FAJ 121 148 Interactive RAB for up to 384 kbps

› License exists in all EMT RNCs

Page 36: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 36

URA-PCHActivation and configuration (1)

› Feature Name: PS Interactive URA-PCH › Feature Designation: RabCombination021› Key Id: CXC 403 0521 › FAJ Number: FAJ 121 407

Page 37: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 37

URA-PCHActivation and configuration (2)

› Introduce SP0 (Conv. CS Speech + PS Interactive 0/0,

RabCombination009) to avoid allocation of PS resources for speech calls when in URA_PCH state.

› If Multi-RAB SP0 is used, it is also important to change the default setting of the dlRlcBufUpswitchMrab parameter. The default value is 0, which means that no upswitches from SP0 will occur, irrespective of RLC buffer load. Initial recommendation is to set dlRlcBufUpswitchMrab = 5.

Page 38: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 38

URA-PCHActivation and configuration (3)

RNC configuration:With URA_PCH, more users are in connected state and the number of connections to the core network will increase. To support this the number of signaling connections, maxconn, is recommended to be set to a higher number.Note: This need to be configured in CN also.

Already set to 75000 per RNC

Page 39: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 39

URA-PCHSetting of inactivity timers

› T2: (inactivityTimer) 5 seconds

› T3: (inactivityTimerPch) 29 minutes

– sets the maximum time in URA state before the UE is released to Idle

– For maximum URA_PCH benefit 29 min is recommended.(T3 shall not be set to the same value as T305, i.e T305 shall be longer than T3. Current T305 setting in EMT Network is 30 minutes.)

HSPA

FACH

Idle

URA

T1

T2

T3

Page 40: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 40

URA-PCHSetting of DRX Cycles

› The DRX cycle length can be set different for CN CS, CN PS and UTRAN initiated pages using

– cnDrxCycleLengthCs– cnDrxCycleLengthPs– utranDrxCycleLength

› The recommended value for cnDrxCycleLengthPs and utranDrxCycleLength is increased to 640 ms from W11. This means that all 3 DrxCycle lengths are recommended to be 640 ms.

Page 41: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 41

URA-PCHPLM Info› PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

– If Cell Reselection interrupts an ongoing SM (Security Mode) procedure (i.e. CellUpdate is received while waiting for an RRC SMComplete), then the RNC legacy behaviour is to release the connection and issue an Exception Code EC946 to identify the collision triggering the drop. The affected KPIs are CS accessibility (since CS establishment attempt is aborted) and PS retainability (since existing PS RAB is dropped).

– The most important scenario for an EC946 collision to be triggered is that the UE is in FACH (or URA) state with an active PDP connection, and an speech call is started for the UE. The speech call always triggers a security procedure from CS Core NW (which is performed on FACH). At the same time as the speech call is started, and the security procedure on FACH is ongoing, the UE also often initiates a cell reselection procedure. Since the majority of UEs give priority to CellUpdate over other procedures (security in this case), there is a risk that an EC946 collision ("CellUpdate during Security") can occur.

– Similarly, an EC946 collision can be triggered when an SMS (CS) is sent from FACH (or URA) state

› SOLUTION– The current software release only handles the case where a cellUpdate interrupts the ongoing Security

Mode procedure. It also includes observability of other scenarios related to this area in general. The solution has been implemented with an On/Off switch (default Off).

– If CellUpdate interrupts an ongoing security procedure (i.e. RRC SMCommand sent but RRC SMComplete not yet received), then the new improved handling in RNC will:

› issue EC946 as in legacy, but now indicating that the connection will not be dropped› abort the ongoing security procedure, and roll back to previous security configuration› complete the CellUpdate procedure› perform an RLC re-establishment of SRB2-4 as part of CellUpdate procedure› then resend a new RRC SMCommand to restart a new security procedure › in order to distinguish the different security procedures, handling of RRC transaction ID (rrcTID) has

now been added to all RRC SM procedures

Page 42: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 42

URA-PCHPLM Info (continued)› SOLUTION ACTIVATION

– The RncFunction spare parameter index 2 is used to activate the improvement, where:› Value 0 will mean that the new functionality is Off.› Value 3 will mean that the new functionality is On.› No value other than 0 or 3 is allowed.

– RncFunction spare 0,0,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0

› SOLUTION IMPACT– RNC now attempts to recover EC946 (Cell Update during Security procedure). It is not possible to precisely

estimate the success rate, but field trials have shown that over 90% of all EC946 are now successfully recovered. Depending on factors like network characteristics and UE population, the actual success rate can vary.

– Since EC946 will no longer initiate a release of the connection, KPIs for CS NAS Accessibility and PS Retainability should improve. The expected improvement depends on the relative KPI contribution previously due to this EC946.

– With the introduction of URA-PCH and features like Fast Dormancy, as there are inherently more users on FACH, and therefore more occurrences of this EC946 scenario, the expected KPI improvement should be even greater with this solution

› RISK IF SOLUTION IS NOT IMPLEMENTED– Legacy behavior will prevail, i.e. EC946 will lead to immediate release of the connection.– Ericsson strongly recommends that this System Improvement shall be activated. This recommendation is

especially important in networks that have deployed URA_PCH state and is using the W11B feature Fast Dormancy Handling.

Requires at least W11.1.2.5. Needs to be implemented later

Page 43: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 43

Content

› Network Data› Introduction› Feature characteristics› Dimensioning› Configuration› Monitoring

– URA FNI report– Report for the rest of RNCs

Page 44: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 44

MonitoringPS Accessibility

› Overall Accessibility Success Rate PS Interactive

› Number of PS RAB Establishments, PS Interactive

› RAB Establishment Success Rate PS Interactive

nteractivemptPacketIablishAttepmNoRabEst

nteractiveessPacketIablishSuccpmNoRabEst100*

nteractivemptPacketIablishAttepmNoRabEst

nteractiveessPacketIablishSuccpmNoRabEst

*easePsNasSignRelpmNoSystemeasePsNasSignRelpmNoNormal

easePsNasSignRelpmNoNormal

*nnPsaringRrcCopmNoLoadShPsConnectReqpmTotNoRrc

PsSuccConnectReqpmTotNoRrc

100*

nteractiveessPacketIablishSuccpmNoRabEst

Page 45: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 45

MonitoringSpeech Accessibility

› Overall Accessibility Success Rate Speech

ryAttpmNoDirRetmptSpeechablishAttepmNoRabEst

essSpeechablishSuccpmNoRabEst

*easeCsNasSignRelpmNoSystemeaseCsNasSignRelpmNoNormal

easeCsNasSignRelpmNoNormal

*nnCsaringRrcCopmNoLoadShCsConnectReqpmTotNoRrc

CsSuccConnectReqpmTotNoRrc

100*

Page 46: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 46

MonitoringDrop Rate

› RAB Drop Rate PS Interactive

› RAB Drop Rate Speech

aSuccFachUrpmChSwitch

PacketUraRabReleasepmNoSystem

Packet-RabReleasepmNoSystem

PacketUraRabReleasepmNoNormal

Packet -RabReleasepmNoNormal

/PacketUra RabReleasepmNoSystem

Packet-RabReleasepmNoSystem100*

SpeechRabReleasepmNoSystem

Speech RabReleasepmNoNormal/SpeechRabReleasepmNoSystem100*

Page 47: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 47

MonitoringChannel Switching

› Channel Switch Success Rate FACH-URA

› Channel Success Failure Rate URA-FACH

› URA Update Success Rate

hUraAttemptFacpmChSwitch

aSuccFachUrpmChSwitch100*

FachAttemptUrapmChSwitch

hSuccUraFacpmChSwitch100*

AttemptpmNoUraUpd

SuccesspmNoUraUpd100 *

Page 48: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 48

MonitoringPaging

› The paging load in the RNC can be measured as follows:

Where:– = noOfPagingRecordTransm

– is the measurement time in sec

› The paging congestion in the RNC can be measured as follows:

CellsofNumbert

nAttemptTypepmNoPaging rep

__*

1Q _interfacepaging_air

%1001

rep

cong nAttemptTypepmNoPaging

jectedReanAttemptUtrpmNoPagingP

trepn

Page 49: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 49

MonitoringPaging types contribution (1)

› Contribution of LA paging

› Contribution of RA paging

raUetPagingToUpmUtranIni

e+gingToUraUpmCnInitPa

UeRagingToldlepmCnInitPa

UeLagingToldlepmCnInitPa

Ue+gingToldlepmCnInitPa

/UeLagingToldlepmCnInitPa100*

raUetPagingToUpmUtranIni

e+gingToUraUpmCnInitPa

UeRagingToldlepmCnInitPa

UeLagingToldlepmCnInitPa

Ue+gingToldlepmCnInitPa

/UeRagingToldlepmCnInitPa100*

Page 50: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 50

MonitoringPaging types contribution (2)

› Contribution of Global paging

› Contribution of URA paging

raUetPagingToUpmUtranIni

e+gingToUraUpmCnInitPa

UeRagingToldlepmCnInitPa

UeLagingToldlepmCnInitPa

Ue+gingToldlepmCnInitPa

/raUetPagingToUpmUtranIni

e+gingToUraUpmCnInitPa100*

raUetPagingToUpmUtranIni

e+gingToUraUpmCnInitPa

UeRagingToldlepmCnInitPa

UeLagingToldlepmCnInitPa

Ue+gingToldlepmCnInitPa

/UegingToldlepmCnInitPa100*

Page 51: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 51

Monitoringusers

› Active Users SRNC

› Average Users URA

stCell ctiveUesBepmSamplesA

lleUesBestCepmSumActiv

abUra pmSamplesR

a pmSumRabUr

Page 52: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 52

MonitoringProcessor’ load

› mMP load

› C2MP load

deasuredLoapmSamplesM

redLoadpmSumMeasuLoadmMP _

deasuredLoapmSamplesM

redLoadpmSumMeasuLoadMPC _2

Page 53: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA FNI

RNC2T

Page 54: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 54

Executive summary

› Paging Intensity has increased ~70% - as expected.› ~60% of Paging Load is to URA – very good potential in case area split is

required in the future (only URA split can be applied)› ~45% reduction in the number of PS RAB Establishments – much less

signalling.› ~50% of users reside in URA_PCH state – better user experience for PS users

(lower HS setup latency, positive impact on the battery etc)› No major degradation in Accessibility and Retainability.

– Some degradation in FACH retainability. But not user impacting, since extra drops are due to FACH -> URA failures during PS inactivity. UE related.

– Some degradation in IRAT HO Success Rate for Multi-RAB. Caused by higher usage of “Speech + PS 0/0”. Not critical, since general Speech Retainability is not degraded.

– IRAT HO Drop Rate degradation is not related to URA activation. Caused by 3 cells more than 24 H later.

Page 55: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 55

Overall Accessibility Success Rate PS Interactive

PS Accessibility

97.50%

98.00%

98.50%

99.00%

99.50%

100.00%

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300

PS Data Interactive accessibility

URA Activated

No degradation

Page 56: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 56

PS RRC and RAB Accessibility

PS RRC and RAB Blocking

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

0.20%

0.25%

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300

RRC blocking PS Interactive RAB blocking PS Interactive

URA Activated

No degradation

Page 57: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 57

Number of PS RAB Establishments

Call Distribution

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300R

AB

Est

ablis

hm

ents

(#

per

sec

)

Voice CS Data R99 PS HS/A-DCH HS/EUL

URA Activated

~45% decrease

Page 58: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 58

SPEECH Accessibility

Speech Accessibility

96.00%

96.50%

97.00%

97.50%

98.00%

98.50%

99.00%

99.50%

100.00%

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300

CS Speech accessibility (load sharing excluded)

URA Activated

No degradation

Page 59: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 59

PS Retainability

PS Retainability

99.00%

99.20%

99.40%

99.60%

99.80%

100.00%

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300

PS Interactive retainability

URA Activated

No degradation

Page 60: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 60

FACH retainability

FACH

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

4000024

.01.

2013

14:

00

24.0

1.20

13 1

9:45

25.0

1.20

13 0

1:30

25.0

1.20

13 0

7:15

25.0

1.20

13 1

3:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

8:45

26.0

1.20

13 0

0:30

26.0

1.20

13 0

6:15

26.0

1.20

13 1

2:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

7:45

26.0

1.20

13 2

3:30

27.0

1.20

13 0

5:15

27.0

1.20

13 1

1:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

6:45

27.0

1.20

13 2

2:30

28.0

1.20

13 0

4:15

28.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

5:45

28.0

1.20

13 2

1:30

29.0

1.20

13 0

3:15

29.0

1.20

13 0

9:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

4:45

29.0

1.20

13 2

0:30

30.0

1.20

13 0

2:15

30.0

1.20

13 0

8:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

3:45

30.0

1.20

13 1

9:30

Date

FA

CH

Dis

con

nec

t N

orm

al

0

50

100

150

200

250

FA

CH

Dis

con

nec

t A

bn

orm

al +

FA

CH

to

U

RA

Fai

lure

s

pmNoCellFachDisconnectNormal pmNoCellFachDisconnectAbnorm FACH to URA failures

URA Activated

The difference between no URA and URA is that there is currently a transition from FACH>URA instead of FACH>Idle, where the extra drops originated from. No end-user impact

Page 61: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 61

SPEECH Retainability

Speech Retainability

96.00%

96.50%

97.00%

97.50%

98.00%

98.50%

99.00%

99.50%

100.00%

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300

CS Speech retainability

URA Activated

No degradation

Page 62: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 62

IRAT HO Success rate

IRAT

80.00%

82.00%

84.00%

86.00%

88.00%

90.00%

92.00%

94.00%

96.00%

98.00%

100.00%

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300

IRAT HO success (GSM) Speech

URA Activated

No degradation

Page 63: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 63

IRAT HO Success rate for multi-rab

IRAT

70.00%

75.00%

80.00%

85.00%

90.00%

95.00%

100.00%

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300

IRAT HO success (GSM) Multi-RAB

URA Activated

Slight degradation

Slight degradation is caused my a more extensive usage of “Speech + PS 0/0”. Not critical, since overall Call Dropped Call Rate is not impacted

Page 64: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 64

PS Interactive RAB Drop Rate

PS RAB Drop Rate

0.00%

0.20%

0.40%

0.60%

0.80%

1.00%

1.20%25

.01.

2013

00:

00

25.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 2

1:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 2

2:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 2

3:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

9:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

9:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

Date

%

PS RAB Drop Rate

URA Activated

No degradation

Page 65: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 65

FACH to URA Success Rate

FACH to URA Sucess Rate

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%25

.01.

2013

00:

00

25.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 2

1:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 2

2:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 2

3:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

9:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

9:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

Date

%

FACH to URA Success Rate

URA Activated

Page 66: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 66

URA to FACH Success Rate

URA to FACH Sucess Rate

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%25

.01.

2013

00:

00

25.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 2

1:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 2

2:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 2

3:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

9:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

9:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

Date

%

URA to FACH Success Rate

URA Activated

Page 67: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 67

URA Update Success Rate

URA Update Sucess Rate

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%25

.01.

2013

00:

00

25.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 2

1:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 2

2:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 2

3:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

9:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

9:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

Date

%

URA Update Success Rate

URA Activated

Page 68: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 68

Number of Paging type1 attempts

Paging Type 1

0

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

12000000

14000000

16000000

18000000

2000000025

.01.

2013

00:

00

25.0

1.20

13 0

5:15

25.0

1.20

13 1

0:30

25.0

1.20

13 1

5:45

25.0

1.20

13 2

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

2:15

26.0

1.20

13 0

7:30

26.0

1.20

13 1

2:45

26.0

1.20

13 1

8:00

26.0

1.20

13 2

3:15

27.0

1.20

13 0

4:30

27.0

1.20

13 0

9:45

27.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

27.0

1.20

13 2

0:15

28.0

1.20

13 0

1:30

28.0

1.20

13 0

6:45

28.0

1.20

13 1

2:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

7:15

28.0

1.20

13 2

2:30

29.0

1.20

13 0

3:45

29.0

1.20

13 0

9:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

4:15

29.0

1.20

13 1

9:30

30.0

1.20

13 0

0:45

30.0

1.20

13 0

6:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

1:15

30.0

1.20

13 1

6:30

30.0

1.20

13 2

1:45

Date

#

pmNoPagingType1Attempt

URA Activated

~70% increase

Page 69: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 69

Paging Intensity

Paging Intesity

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.0025

.01.

2013

00:

00

25.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 2

1:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 2

2:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 2

3:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

9:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

9:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

Date

Pag

es p

er c

ell

per

sec

on

d

Paging Intensity

URA Activated

Peaks up to 75 pages per cell per second. Daily average ~50. Within expectations

Page 70: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 70

Paging type contribution

Paging Type Contribution

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%25

.01.

2013

00:

00

25.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

25.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

25.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 0

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

1:00

26.0

1.20

13 1

6:00

26.0

1.20

13 2

1:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 0

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

2:00

27.0

1.20

13 1

7:00

27.0

1.20

13 2

2:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 0

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

3:00

28.0

1.20

13 1

8:00

28.0

1.20

13 2

3:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 0

9:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

4:00

29.0

1.20

13 1

9:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 0

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

0:00

30.0

1.20

13 1

5:00

30.0

1.20

13 2

0:00

Date

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n i

n %

Global Pagings LA Pagings RA Pagings URA Pagings

URA Activated

URA paging constitutes ~60% during BH. Good potential.

Page 71: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 71

Number of users

User Distribution

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300C

on

nec

ted

Use

rs

Voice CS Data R99 PS HS/A-DCH HS/EUL FACH URA HS-FACH EUL-FACH

URA Activated

~50% of users in URA state – very positive result.

Page 72: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 72

Active users vs iub throughput

Iub Throughput vs Active Users

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300

Iub

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

0.0

500.0

1000.0

1500.0

2000.0

2500.0

3000.0

3500.0

4000.0

Act

ive

Use

rs

Iub Throughput Active Users

URA Activated

Page 73: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 73

Processor load overview

Processor Load Comparison

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300

Module MP RANAP/C2 MP Load DC-SP CC-SP PDR-SP RNSAP/C2 MP Load

URA Activated

Page 74: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 74

Mmp and ranap load

Processor Load Comparison

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

130125.0000

130125.1300

130126.0200

130126.1500

130127.0400

130127.1700

130128.0600

130128.1900

130129.0800

130129.2100

130130.1000

130130.2300

Module MP RANAP/C2 MP Load

URA Activated

With URA we expect a reduction in mMP and RANAP load. Due to very low initial processor load this gain is not very pronounced.

Page 75: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 75

IRAT HO Drop Rateday

IRAT HO Drop Rate (Day level)

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

2.00

1/2

2/2

013

1/2

3/2

013

1/2

4/2

013

1/2

5/2

013

1/2

6/2

013

1/2

7/2

013

1/2

8/2

013

1/2

9/2

013

1/3

0/2

013

1/3

1/2

013

2/1

/2013

%

RNC2T

URA Activated

Degradation start

Not related to URA activation

Page 76: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 76

IRAT HO Drop Ratehour

IRAT HO Drop Rate (Hour Level)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

1/2

2/2

013 0

.00

1/2

2/2

013 5

.00

1/2

2/2

013 1

0.0

0

1/2

2/2

013 1

5.0

0

1/2

2/2

013 2

0.0

0

1/2

3/2

013 1

.00

1/2

3/2

013 6

.00

1/2

3/2

013 1

1.0

0

1/2

3/2

013 1

6.0

0

1/2

3/2

013 2

1.0

0

1/2

4/2

013 2

.00

1/2

4/2

013 7

.00

1/2

4/2

013 1

2.0

0

1/2

4/2

013 1

7.0

0

1/2

4/2

013 2

2.0

0

1/2

5/2

013 3

.00

1/2

5/2

013 8

.00

1/2

5/2

013 1

3.0

0

1/2

5/2

013 1

8.0

0

1/2

5/2

013 2

3.0

0

1/2

6/2

013 4

.00

1/2

6/2

013 9

.00

1/2

6/2

013 1

4.0

0

1/2

6/2

013 1

9.0

0

1/2

7/2

013 0

.00

1/2

7/2

013 5

.00

1/2

7/2

013 1

0.0

0

1/2

7/2

013 1

5.0

0

1/2

7/2

013 2

0.0

0

1/2

8/2

013 1

.00

1/2

8/2

013 6

.00

1/2

8/2

013 1

1.0

0

1/2

8/2

013 1

6.0

0

1/2

8/2

013 2

1.0

0

1/2

9/2

013 2

.00

1/2

9/2

013 7

.00

1/2

9/2

013 1

2.0

0

1/2

9/2

013 1

7.0

0

1/2

9/2

013 2

2.0

0

1/3

0/2

013 3

.00

1/3

0/2

013 8

.00

1/3

0/2

013 1

3.0

0

1/3

0/2

013 1

8.0

0

1/3

0/2

013 2

3.0

0

1/3

1/2

013 4

.00

1/3

1/2

013 9

.00

1/3

1/2

013 1

4.0

0

1/3

1/2

013 1

9.0

0

2/1

/2013 0

.00

2/1

/2013 5

.00

2/1

/2013 1

0.0

0

%

RNC2T

URA Activated

Degradation start

Not related to URA activation

Page 77: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 77

IRAT HO Drop RateROP

IRAT HO Drop Rate (ROP level)

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

1/2

2/2

013 0

.00 0

.00

1/2

2/2

013 3

.00 4

5.0

01/2

2/2

013 7

.00 3

0.0

01/2

2/2

013 1

1.00 1

5.00

1/2

2/2

013 1

5.00 0

.00

1/2

2/2

013 1

8.00 4

5.00

1/2

2/2

013 2

2.00 3

0.00

1/2

3/2

013 2

.00 1

5.0

01/2

3/2

013 6

.00 0

.00

1/2

3/2

013 9

.00 4

5.0

01/2

3/2

013 1

3.00 3

0.00

1/2

3/2

013 1

7.00 1

5.00

1/2

3/2

013 2

1.00 0

.00

1/2

4/2

013 0

.00 4

5.0

01/2

4/2

013 4

.00 3

0.0

01/2

4/2

013 8

.00 1

5.0

01/2

4/2

013 1

2.00 0

.00

1/2

4/2

013 1

5.00 4

5.00

1/2

4/2

013 1

9.00 3

0.00

1/2

4/2

013 2

3.00 1

5.00

1/2

5/2

013 3

.00 0

.00

1/2

5/2

013 6

.00 4

5.0

01/2

5/2

013 1

0.00 3

0.00

1/2

5/2

013 1

4.00 1

5.00

1/2

5/2

013 1

8.00 0

.00

1/2

5/2

013 2

1.00 4

5.00

1/2

6/2

013 1

.00 3

0.0

01/2

6/2

013 5

.00 1

5.0

01/2

6/2

013 9

.00 0

.00

1/2

6/2

013 1

2.00 4

5.00

1/2

6/2

013 1

6.00 3

0.00

1/2

6/2

013 2

0.00 1

5.00

1/2

7/2

013 0

.00 0

.00

1/2

7/2

013 3

.00 4

5.0

01/2

7/2

013 7

.00 3

0.0

01/2

7/2

013 1

1.00 1

5.00

1/2

7/2

013 1

5.00 0

.00

1/2

7/2

013 1

8.00 4

5.00

1/2

7/2

013 2

2.00 3

0.00

1/2

8/2

013 2

.00 1

5.0

01/2

8/2

013 6

.00 0

.00

1/2

8/2

013 9

.00 4

5.0

01/2

8/2

013 1

3.00 3

0.00

1/2

8/2

013 1

7.00 1

5.00

1/2

8/2

013 2

1.00 0

.00

1/2

9/2

013 0

.00 4

5.0

01/2

9/2

013 4

.00 3

0.0

01/2

9/2

013 8

.00 1

5.0

01/2

9/2

013 1

2.00 0

.00

1/2

9/2

013 1

5.00 4

5.00

1/2

9/2

013 1

9.00 3

0.00

1/2

9/2

013 2

3.00 1

5.00

1/3

0/2

013 3

.00 0

.00

1/3

0/2

013 6

.00 4

5.0

01/3

0/2

013 1

0.00 3

0.00

1/3

0/2

013 1

4.00 1

5.00

1/3

0/2

013 1

8.00 0

.00

1/3

0/2

013 2

1.00 4

5.00

1/3

1/2

013 1

.00 3

0.0

01/3

1/2

013 5

.00 1

5.0

01/3

1/2

013 9

.00 0

.00

1/3

1/2

013 1

2.00 4

5.00

1/3

1/2

013 1

6.00 3

0.00

1/3

1/2

013 2

0.00 1

5.00

2/1

/2013

0.0

0 0.0

02/1

/2013

3.0

0 45.0

02/1

/2013

7.0

0 30.0

02/1

/2013

11.0

0 1

5.0

0

%

RNC2T

URA Activated

Degradation start

Not related to URA activation

Page 78: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 78

IRAT HO Drop Rateworst performing cells

IRAT HO Drop Rate, Worst Cells RNC2T

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

28-01-13 29-01-13 30-01-13 31-01-13 01-02-13 02-02-13 03-02-13

IRA

T D

rop

Rat

e, %

IRAT_DROP_PARKSU3

IRAT_DROP_PARKSX3

IRAT_DROP_VORKEU4

IRAT HO Drop Rate Contribution for RNC2T

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

28-01-13 29-01-13 30-01-13 31-01-13 01-02-13 02-02-13 03-02-13IR

AT

Dro

p R

ate

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n,

%

Contribution_PARKSU3

Contribution_PARKSX3

Contribution_VORKEU4

IRAT HO Drop Rate degradation is not related to URA activation. Caused by 3 cells, that degraded on the 30th of January

Page 79: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA activationRNC1

Page 80: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 80

Executive summary

› Paging Intensity has increased ~60% as a result of RA / URA split - as expected.

› ~40% of Paging Load is to URA – lower that in other RNCs. Could be due to Fast Dormancy in UEs

› ~25% reduction in the number of PS RAB Establishments – much less signalling.

› ~30% of users reside in URA_PCH state – better user experience for PS users (lower HS setup latency, positive impact on the battery etc). Lower that in other RNCs. Could be due to Fast Dormancy in UEs

› No major degradation in Accessibility and Retainability.– Some degradation in FACH retainability. But not user impacting, since extra

drops are due to FACH -> URA failures during PS inactivity. UE related.– Slight degradation in PS Drop Rate.

Page 81: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 81

Accessibility

98.00%

98.50%

99.00%

99.50%

100.00%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

PS Data Interactive accessibility

Overall Accessibility Success Rate PS Interactive

URA Activated

No degradation

Page 82: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 82

RRC and RAB Blocking

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

0.20%

0.25%

0.30%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

RRC blocking PS Interactive RAB blocking PS Interactive

PS RRC and RAB Accessibility

URA Activated

PS RRC Accessibility slightly improved

Page 83: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 83

Call Distribution

0

50

100

150

200

250

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

RA

B E

stab

lish

men

ts

Voice CS Data R99 PS HS/A-DCH HS/EUL

Number of PS RAB Establishments

URA Activated

~25% decrease

Page 84: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 84

Accessibility

95.00%

96.00%

97.00%

98.00%

99.00%

100.00%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

CS Speech accessibility

SPEECH AccessibilityURA Activated

No degradation

Page 85: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 85

PS RAB Drop Rate

0.00%

0.10%

0.20%

0.30%

0.40%

0.50%

0.60%

0.70%4.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:00

5.02

.201

3 00

:00

5.02

.201

3 03

:00

5.02

.201

3 06

:00

5.02

.201

3 09

:00

5.02

.201

3 12

:00

5.02

.201

3 15

:00

5.02

.201

3 18

:00

5.02

.201

3 21

:00

6.02

.201

3 00

:00

6.02

.201

3 03

:00

6.02

.201

3 06

:00

6.02

.201

3 09

:00

6.02

.201

3 12

:00

6.02

.201

3 15

:00

6.02

.201

3 18

:00

6.02

.201

3 21

:00

7.02

.201

3 00

:00

7.02

.201

3 03

:00

7.02

.201

3 06

:00

7.02

.201

3 09

:00

Date

%

PS RAB Drop Rate

PS Interactive RAB Drop Rate

URA Activated

Slight increase during Busy Hours

Page 86: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 86

FACH

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

1200004.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:15

4.02

.201

3 06

:30

4.02

.201

3 09

:45

4.02

.201

3 13

:00

4.02

.201

3 16

:15

4.02

.201

3 19

:30

4.02

.201

3 22

:45

5.02

.201

3 02

:00

5.02

.201

3 05

:15

5.02

.201

3 08

:30

5.02

.201

3 11

:45

5.02

.201

3 15

:00

5.02

.201

3 18

:15

5.02

.201

3 21

:30

6.02

.201

3 00

:45

6.02

.201

3 04

:00

6.02

.201

3 07

:15

6.02

.201

3 10

:30

6.02

.201

3 13

:45

6.02

.201

3 17

:00

6.02

.201

3 20

:15

6.02

.201

3 23

:30

7.02

.201

3 02

:45

7.02

.201

3 06

:00

7.02

.201

3 09

:15

Date

FA

CH

Dis

con

nec

t N

orm

al

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

FA

CH

Dis

con

nec

t A

bn

orm

al +

FA

CH

to

U

RA

Fai

lure

s

pmNoCellFachDisconnectNormal pmNoCellFachDisconnectAbnorm FACH to URA failures

FACH retainabilityURA Activated

The difference between no URA and URA is that there is currently a transition from FACH>URA instead of FACH>Idle, where the extra drops originated from. No end-user impact

Page 87: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 87

Retainability

97.00%

97.50%

98.00%

98.50%

99.00%

99.50%

100.00%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

CS Speech retainability

SPEECH RetainabilityURA Activated

No degradation

Page 88: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 88

FACH to URA Sucess Rate

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%4.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:00

5.02

.201

3 00

:00

5.02

.201

3 03

:00

5.02

.201

3 06

:00

5.02

.201

3 09

:00

5.02

.201

3 12

:00

5.02

.201

3 15

:00

5.02

.201

3 18

:00

5.02

.201

3 21

:00

6.02

.201

3 00

:00

6.02

.201

3 03

:00

6.02

.201

3 06

:00

6.02

.201

3 09

:00

6.02

.201

3 12

:00

6.02

.201

3 15

:00

6.02

.201

3 18

:00

6.02

.201

3 21

:00

7.02

.201

3 00

:00

7.02

.201

3 03

:00

7.02

.201

3 06

:00

7.02

.201

3 09

:00

Date

%

FACH to URA Success Rate

FACH to URA Success Rate

URA Activated

Page 89: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 89

URA to FACH Sucess Rate

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%4.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:00

5.02

.201

3 00

:00

5.02

.201

3 03

:00

5.02

.201

3 06

:00

5.02

.201

3 09

:00

5.02

.201

3 12

:00

5.02

.201

3 15

:00

5.02

.201

3 18

:00

5.02

.201

3 21

:00

6.02

.201

3 00

:00

6.02

.201

3 03

:00

6.02

.201

3 06

:00

6.02

.201

3 09

:00

6.02

.201

3 12

:00

6.02

.201

3 15

:00

6.02

.201

3 18

:00

6.02

.201

3 21

:00

7.02

.201

3 00

:00

7.02

.201

3 03

:00

7.02

.201

3 06

:00

7.02

.201

3 09

:00

Date

%

URA to FACH Success Rate

URA to FACH Success Rate

URA Activated

Page 90: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 90

URA Update Sucess Rate

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%4.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:00

5.02

.201

3 00

:00

5.02

.201

3 03

:00

5.02

.201

3 06

:00

5.02

.201

3 09

:00

5.02

.201

3 12

:00

5.02

.201

3 15

:00

5.02

.201

3 18

:00

5.02

.201

3 21

:00

6.02

.201

3 00

:00

6.02

.201

3 03

:00

6.02

.201

3 06

:00

6.02

.201

3 09

:00

6.02

.201

3 12

:00

6.02

.201

3 15

:00

6.02

.201

3 18

:00

6.02

.201

3 21

:00

7.02

.201

3 00

:00

7.02

.201

3 03

:00

7.02

.201

3 06

:00

7.02

.201

3 09

:00

Date

%

URA Update Success Rate

URA Update Success RateURA Activated

Page 91: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 91

Paging Type 1

0

10000000

20000000

30000000

40000000

50000000

60000000

70000000

800000004.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:00

5.02

.201

3 00

:00

5.02

.201

3 03

:00

5.02

.201

3 06

:00

5.02

.201

3 09

:00

5.02

.201

3 12

:00

5.02

.201

3 15

:00

5.02

.201

3 18

:00

5.02

.201

3 21

:00

6.02

.201

3 00

:00

6.02

.201

3 03

:00

6.02

.201

3 06

:00

6.02

.201

3 09

:00

6.02

.201

3 12

:00

6.02

.201

3 15

:00

6.02

.201

3 18

:00

6.02

.201

3 21

:00

7.02

.201

3 00

:00

7.02

.201

3 03

:00

7.02

.201

3 06

:00

7.02

.201

3 09

:00

Date

#

pmNoPagingType1Attempt

Number of Paging type1 attempts

URA Activated

~60% reductiondue to RA / URA split

Page 92: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 92

Paging Intesity

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.004.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:00

5.02

.201

3 00

:00

5.02

.201

3 03

:00

5.02

.201

3 06

:00

5.02

.201

3 09

:00

5.02

.201

3 12

:00

5.02

.201

3 15

:00

5.02

.201

3 18

:00

5.02

.201

3 21

:00

6.02

.201

3 00

:00

6.02

.201

3 03

:00

6.02

.201

3 06

:00

6.02

.201

3 09

:00

6.02

.201

3 12

:00

6.02

.201

3 15

:00

6.02

.201

3 18

:00

6.02

.201

3 21

:00

7.02

.201

3 00

:00

7.02

.201

3 03

:00

7.02

.201

3 06

:00

7.02

.201

3 09

:00

Date

Pag

es p

er c

ell

per

sec

on

d

Paging Intensity

Paging IntensityURA Activated

Peaks up to 95 pages per cell per second. Daily average ~60. Within expectations. Has to be closely monitored.

Page 93: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 93

Paging Type Contribution

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%4.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:00

5.02

.201

3 00

:00

5.02

.201

3 03

:00

5.02

.201

3 06

:00

5.02

.201

3 09

:00

5.02

.201

3 12

:00

5.02

.201

3 15

:00

5.02

.201

3 18

:00

5.02

.201

3 21

:00

6.02

.201

3 00

:00

6.02

.201

3 03

:00

6.02

.201

3 06

:00

6.02

.201

3 09

:00

6.02

.201

3 12

:00

6.02

.201

3 15

:00

6.02

.201

3 18

:00

6.02

.201

3 21

:00

7.02

.201

3 00

:00

7.02

.201

3 03

:00

7.02

.201

3 06

:00

7.02

.201

3 09

:00

Date

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n i

n %

Global Pagings LA Pagings RA Pagings URA Pagings

Paging type contributionURA Activated

URA paging constitutes ~40% during BH.

Page 94: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 94

User Distribution

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

Co

nn

ecte

d U

sers

Voice CS Data R99 PS HS/A-DCH HS/EUL FACH URA HS-FACH EUL-FACH

Number of usersURA Activated

~30% of users in URA state – less that in other RNCs. Could be due to fast dormancy in UEs.

Page 95: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 95

Iub Throughput vs Active Users

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

Iub

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

0.0

1000.0

2000.0

3000.0

4000.0

5000.0

6000.0

7000.0

8000.0

9000.0

Act

ive

Use

rs

Iub Throughput Active Users

Active users vs iub throughput

URA Activated

Page 96: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 96

Processor Load Comparison

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

Module MP RANAP/C2 MP Load DC-SP CC-SP PDR-SP RNSAP/C2 MP Load

Processor load overviewURA Activated

Page 97: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 97

Processor Load Comparison

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

Module MP RANAP/C2 MP Load

Mmp and ranap loadURA Activated

~10% reduction in mMP load and ~5% reduction in RANAP load.

Page 98: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 98

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

1/26/2013 1/27/2013 1/28/2013 1/29/2013 1/30/2013 1/31/2013 2/1/2013 2/2/2013 2/3/2013 2/4/2013 2/5/2013 2/6/2013 2/7/2013

RNC1

IRAT HO Drop RateURA Activated

No degradation

Page 99: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA activationRNC3

Page 100: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 100

Executive summary

› Increased Paging Intensity and Channel Switching rate have revealed an ISL3 link problem

› ISL Load Control caused Iub Throughput degradation› InactivityTimer was rolled back to 20sec and URA

deactivated.

Page 101: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 101

RNC3 Iub throughput

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

2/7/

13 /

0 /

0

2/7/

13 /

0 /

30

2/7/

13 /

1 /

0

2/7/

13 /

1 /

30

2/7/

13 /

2 /

0

2/7/

13 /

2 /

30

2/7/

13 /

3 /

0

2/7/

13 /

3 /

30

2/7/

13 /

4 /

0

2/7/

13 /

4 /

30

2/7/

13 /

5 /

0

2/7/

13 /

5 /

30

2/7/

13 /

6 /

0

2/7/

13 /

6 /

30

2/7/

13 /

7 /

0

2/7/

13 /

7 /

30

2/7/

13 /

8 /

0

2/7/

13 /

8 /

30

2/7/

13 /

9 /

0

2/7/

13 /

9 /

30

2/7/

13 /

10

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

10

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

11

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

11

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

12

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

12

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

13

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

13

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

14

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

14

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

15

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

15

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

16

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

16

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

17

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

17

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

18

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

18

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

19

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

19

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

20

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

20

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

21

/ 0

2/7/

13 /

21

/ 30

2/7/

13 /

22

/ 0

Date / Hour / Min

RN

C_C

AP

AC

ITY

RNC1 / IubThroughput

RNC2T / IubThroughput

RNC3 / IubThroughput

RNC4 / IubThroughput

InactivityTimer5sec -> 20sec

URA OFF

Page 102: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA activationRNC4

Page 103: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 103

Executive summary

› Paging Intensity has increased ~75% - as expected.› ~60% of Paging Load is to URA – very good potential in case area split

is required in the future (only URA split can be applied)› ~45% reduction in the number of PS RAB Establishments – much less

signalling.› ~50% of users reside in URA_PCH state – better user experience for

PS users (lower HS setup latency, positive impact on the battery etc)› No major degradation in Accessibility and Retainability.

– Some degradation in FACH retainability. But not user impacting, since extra drops are due to FACH -> URA failures during PS inactivity. UE related.

– Improvement in PS Drop Rate.

Page 104: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 104

Accessibility

94.00%

95.00%

96.00%

97.00%

98.00%

99.00%

100.00%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

PS Data Interactive accessibility

Overall Accessibility Success Rate PS Interactive

URA Activated

No degradation

Page 105: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 105

PS RRC and RAB Accessibility

RRC and RAB Blocking

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

0.20%

0.25%

0.30%

0.35%

0.40%

0.45%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

RRC blocking PS Interactive RAB blocking PS Interactive

URA Activated

No degradation

Page 106: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 106

Call Distribution

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

RA

B E

stab

lish

men

ts

Voice CS Data R99 PS HS/A-DCH HS/EUL

Number of PS RAB Establishments

URA Activated

~45% decrease

Page 107: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 107

Speech Accessibility

94.00%

95.00%

96.00%

97.00%

98.00%

99.00%

100.00%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

CS Speech accessibility (load sharing excluded)

SPEECH AccessibilityURA Activated

No degradation

Page 108: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 108

PS RAB Drop Rate

0.00%

0.20%

0.40%

0.60%

0.80%

1.00%

1.20%4.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:15

5.02

.201

3 00

:15

5.02

.201

3 03

:15

5.02

.201

3 06

:15

5.02

.201

3 09

:15

5.02

.201

3 12

:15

5.02

.201

3 15

:15

5.02

.201

3 18

:15

5.02

.201

3 21

:15

6.02

.201

3 00

:15

6.02

.201

3 03

:15

6.02

.201

3 06

:15

6.02

.201

3 09

:15

6.02

.201

3 12

:15

6.02

.201

3 15

:15

6.02

.201

3 18

:15

6.02

.201

3 21

:15

7.02

.201

3 00

:15

7.02

.201

3 03

:15

7.02

.201

3 06

:15

7.02

.201

3 09

:15

Date

%

PS RAB Drop Rate

PS Interactive RAB Drop Rate

URA Activated

~50% decrease

Page 109: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 109

FACH

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

500004.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:15

5.02

.201

3 00

:15

5.02

.201

3 03

:15

5.02

.201

3 06

:15

5.02

.201

3 09

:15

5.02

.201

3 12

:15

5.02

.201

3 15

:15

5.02

.201

3 18

:15

5.02

.201

3 21

:15

6.02

.201

3 00

:15

6.02

.201

3 03

:15

6.02

.201

3 06

:15

6.02

.201

3 09

:15

6.02

.201

3 12

:15

6.02

.201

3 15

:15

6.02

.201

3 18

:15

6.02

.201

3 21

:15

7.02

.201

3 00

:15

7.02

.201

3 03

:15

7.02

.201

3 06

:15

7.02

.201

3 09

:15

Date

FA

CH

Dis

con

nec

t N

orm

al

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

FA

CH

Dis

con

nec

t A

bn

orm

al +

FA

CH

to

U

RA

Fai

lure

s

pmNoCellFachDisconnectNormal pmNoCellFachDisconnectAbnorm FACH to URA failures

FACH retainabilityURA Activated

The difference between no URA and URA is that there is currently a transition from FACH>URA instead of FACH>Idle, where the extra drops originated from. No end-user impact

Page 110: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 110

Retainability

95.00%

95.50%

96.00%

96.50%

97.00%

97.50%

98.00%

98.50%

99.00%

99.50%

100.00%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

CS Speech retainability

SPEECH RetainabilityURA Activated

No degradation

Page 111: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 111

FACH to URA Sucess Rate

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%4.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:15

5.02

.201

3 00

:15

5.02

.201

3 03

:15

5.02

.201

3 06

:15

5.02

.201

3 09

:15

5.02

.201

3 12

:15

5.02

.201

3 15

:15

5.02

.201

3 18

:15

5.02

.201

3 21

:15

6.02

.201

3 00

:15

6.02

.201

3 03

:15

6.02

.201

3 06

:15

6.02

.201

3 09

:15

6.02

.201

3 12

:15

6.02

.201

3 15

:15

6.02

.201

3 18

:15

6.02

.201

3 21

:15

7.02

.201

3 00

:15

7.02

.201

3 03

:15

7.02

.201

3 06

:15

7.02

.201

3 09

:15

Date

%

FACH to URA Success Rate

FACH to URA Success Rate

URA Activated

Page 112: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 112

URA to FACH Sucess Rate

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%4.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:15

5.02

.201

3 00

:15

5.02

.201

3 03

:15

5.02

.201

3 06

:15

5.02

.201

3 09

:15

5.02

.201

3 12

:15

5.02

.201

3 15

:15

5.02

.201

3 18

:15

5.02

.201

3 21

:15

6.02

.201

3 00

:15

6.02

.201

3 03

:15

6.02

.201

3 06

:15

6.02

.201

3 09

:15

6.02

.201

3 12

:15

6.02

.201

3 15

:15

6.02

.201

3 18

:15

6.02

.201

3 21

:15

7.02

.201

3 00

:15

7.02

.201

3 03

:15

7.02

.201

3 06

:15

7.02

.201

3 09

:15

Date

%

URA to FACH Success Rate

URA to FACH Success Rate

URA Activated

Page 113: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 113

URA Update Sucess Rate

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%4.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:15

5.02

.201

3 00

:15

5.02

.201

3 03

:15

5.02

.201

3 06

:15

5.02

.201

3 09

:15

5.02

.201

3 12

:15

5.02

.201

3 15

:15

5.02

.201

3 18

:15

5.02

.201

3 21

:15

6.02

.201

3 00

:15

6.02

.201

3 03

:15

6.02

.201

3 06

:15

6.02

.201

3 09

:15

6.02

.201

3 12

:15

6.02

.201

3 15

:15

6.02

.201

3 18

:15

6.02

.201

3 21

:15

7.02

.201

3 00

:15

7.02

.201

3 03

:15

7.02

.201

3 06

:15

7.02

.201

3 09

:15

Date

%

URA Update Success Rate

URA Update Success RateURA Activated

Page 114: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 114

Paging Type 1

0

5000000

10000000

15000000

20000000

25000000

30000000

35000000

400000004.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:15

5.02

.201

3 00

:15

5.02

.201

3 03

:15

5.02

.201

3 06

:15

5.02

.201

3 09

:15

5.02

.201

3 12

:15

5.02

.201

3 15

:15

5.02

.201

3 18

:15

5.02

.201

3 21

:15

6.02

.201

3 00

:15

6.02

.201

3 03

:15

6.02

.201

3 06

:15

6.02

.201

3 09

:15

6.02

.201

3 12

:15

6.02

.201

3 15

:15

6.02

.201

3 18

:15

6.02

.201

3 21

:15

7.02

.201

3 00

:15

7.02

.201

3 03

:15

7.02

.201

3 06

:15

7.02

.201

3 09

:15

Date

#

pmNoPagingType1Attempt

Number of Paging type1 attempts

URA Activated

~75% increase

Page 115: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 115

Paging Intesity

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.004.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:15

5.02

.201

3 00

:15

5.02

.201

3 03

:15

5.02

.201

3 06

:15

5.02

.201

3 09

:15

5.02

.201

3 12

:15

5.02

.201

3 15

:15

5.02

.201

3 18

:15

5.02

.201

3 21

:15

6.02

.201

3 00

:15

6.02

.201

3 03

:15

6.02

.201

3 06

:15

6.02

.201

3 09

:15

6.02

.201

3 12

:15

6.02

.201

3 15

:15

6.02

.201

3 18

:15

6.02

.201

3 21

:15

7.02

.201

3 00

:15

7.02

.201

3 03

:15

7.02

.201

3 06

:15

7.02

.201

3 09

:15

Date

Pag

es p

er c

ell

per

sec

on

d

Paging Intensity

Paging IntensityURA Activated

Peaks up to 105 pages per cell per second. Daily average ~75. Within expectations. Has to be closely monitored.

Page 116: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 116

Paging Type Contribution

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%4.

02.2

013

00:0

0

4.02

.201

3 03

:00

4.02

.201

3 06

:00

4.02

.201

3 09

:00

4.02

.201

3 12

:00

4.02

.201

3 15

:00

4.02

.201

3 18

:00

4.02

.201

3 21

:15

5.02

.201

3 00

:15

5.02

.201

3 03

:15

5.02

.201

3 06

:15

5.02

.201

3 09

:15

5.02

.201

3 12

:15

5.02

.201

3 15

:15

5.02

.201

3 18

:15

5.02

.201

3 21

:15

6.02

.201

3 00

:15

6.02

.201

3 03

:15

6.02

.201

3 06

:15

6.02

.201

3 09

:15

6.02

.201

3 12

:15

6.02

.201

3 15

:15

6.02

.201

3 18

:15

6.02

.201

3 21

:15

7.02

.201

3 00

:15

7.02

.201

3 03

:15

7.02

.201

3 06

:15

7.02

.201

3 09

:15

Date

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

n i

n %

Global Pagings LA Pagings RA Pagings URA Pagings

Paging type contributionURA Activated

URA paging constitutes ~60% during BH. Good potential.

Page 117: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 117

User Distribution

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

Co

nn

ecte

d U

sers

Voice CS Data R99 PS HS/A-DCH HS/EUL FACH URA HS-FACH EUL-FACH

Number of usersURA Activated

~50% of users in URA state – very positive result.

Page 118: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 118

Iub Throughput vs Active Users

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

Iub

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

0.0

1000.0

2000.0

3000.0

4000.0

5000.0

6000.0

7000.0

Act

ive

Use

rs

Iub Throughput Active Users

Active users vs iub throughput

URA Activated

Page 119: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 119

Processor Load Comparison

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

Module MP RANAP/C2 MP Load DC-SP CC-SP PDR-SP RNSAP/C2 MP Load

Processor load overviewURA Activated

Page 120: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 120

Processor Load Comparison

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

130204.0000

130204.0600

130204.1200

130204.1800

130205.0000

130205.0600

130205.1200

130205.1800

130206.0000

130206.0600

130206.1200

130206.1800

Module MP RANAP/C2 MP Load

Mmp and ranap loadURA Activated

With URA we expect a reduction in mMP and RANAP load. Due to very low initial processor load this gain is not very pronounced.

Page 121: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6

URA-PCH Deployment Recommendations | Commercial in confidence | 2013-02-08 | Page 121

IRAT HO Drop RateURA Activated

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

1/26/2013 1/27/2013 1/28/2013 1/29/2013 1/30/2013 1/31/2013 2/1/2013 2/2/2013 2/3/2013 2/4/2013 2/5/2013 2/6/2013 2/7/2013

RNC4

No degradation

Page 122: URA PCH Deployment KS 2013 Rev PA6