update on pbpp within the state of texas · 2018. 6. 27. · definition of tpm in short,...
TRANSCRIPT
Update on PBPP within the State of Texas
BY: KIRK D. FAUVER PLANNING & RESEARCH ENGINEER FHWA TEXAS DIVISION (HPP-TX) JUNE 7, 2018
PBPP Framework
TPM Framework
2
Where Do We Want to Go? Based upon a vision for the future Results in goals, objectives, and measures
Goals and Objectives
Performance Measures
PLANNING
Strategic Direction
3
Seven National Goals (MAP-21/FAST Act)
Safety Infrastructure condition (pavement &
bridge) Congestion reduction System reliability Freight movement and economic vitality Environmental sustainability Reduced project delivery delays
4
Source: 23 U.S.C. 150(b)
How Are We Going to Get There?
Identify trends, targets, gaps, strategies, and solutions Results in long-range planning products
Identify Trends and Targets
Identify Strategies and Analyze Alternatives
Develop Investment Priorities
PLANNING
Analysis
5
What Will It Take? Involves prioritization and selection of possible solutions Results in short-term plans and improvement programs
Investment Plan
Resource Allocation
Program of Projects
PROGRAMMING
6
How Did We Do? Monitoring and evaluation occur throughout the process Results in performance reports
IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION
Monitoring
Evaluation
Reporting
7
PBPP and TPM
PBPP Framework TPM Framework
• Continuous public involvement, analysis, and coordination
8
Definition of TPM In short, Transportation Performance Management:
Is systematically applied, a regular ongoing process Provides key information to help decision makers allowing them to
understand the consequences of investment decisions across transportation assets or modes
Improving communications between decision makers, stakeholders and the traveling public
Ensuring targets and measures are developed in cooperative partnerships and based on data and objective information
9
Federal Requirements 10
1. Developing performance management agreements 2. Establishing performance targets 3. Integrating performance-based plans and processes 4. Evaluating past condition and performance 5. Describing anticipated future performance target achievement 6. Phasing-in planning rule and performance measures
Performance Management Agreements
MPO(s), State(s), and public transportation provider(s) shall jointly agree upon and develop specific written provisions for cooperatively developing and sharing information related to: Transportation performance data
The selection of performance targets
The reporting of performance targets
The reporting of performance to be used in tracking progress toward attainment of critical outcomes for the region of the MPO
The collection of data for the State asset management plans for the National Highway System (NHS)
NOTE: For more information, please see 23 CFR 450.314
11
FAST Act Requirements Under 23 CFR 450.314(h)
(h)(1) The MPO(s), State(s), and the providers of public transportation shall jointly agree upon and develop specific written provisions for cooperatively developing and sharing information related to transportation performance data, the selection of performance targets, the reporting of performance targets, the reporting of performance to be used in tracking progress toward attainment of critical outcomes for the region of the MPO, and the collection of data for the State asset management plan for the NHS.
Documented as part of: 1) the MPO planning agreements, or 2) in some other means outside of the MPO agreements as
determined cooperatively by the MPO(s), State(s), and providers of public transportation.
12
Development of Template MOU
Includes: - Roles & Responsibilities - Target Setting - Tracking and Reporting - Monitoring of Trends
Agencies involved include: - State DOT/TxDOT - MPO, and - Regional Transit
Operator
13
Three Options for Consideration (Joint Letter to MPO Directors- 01/05/18)
Option 1: Adopt the complete Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) template for MPO, TxDOT, and Public Transit Operators for performance-based planning.
Option 2: for areas with existing MOU agreement, simply amend it with the performance-based planning language (as shown within the MOU template).
Option 3: for areas that do not have a fully executed agreement with all three parties, need to adopt an agreement that includes the performance-based planning requirements (as shown within the MOU template).
14
Establishing Performance Targets
For FHWA’s performance measures, States and MPOs shall coordinate when setting targets to ensure consistency
For FTA’s performance measures: Inside metropolitan planning areas, MPOs shall coordinate with public transportation
providers when setting targets to ensure consistency
Outside metropolitan planning areas, States shall coordinate with public transportation providers when setting targets to ensure consistency
MPOs have two options for establishing performance targets: 1. Establish its own quantifiable performance target
2. Adopt a State or public transportation provider’s performance target and support the efforts to achieve those targets
NOTE: For more information, please see 23 CFR 450.206 and 23 CFR 450.306
15
Integrating Plans and Processes
The goals, objectives, performance measures, and targets from other performance-based plans and programs shall be integrated into the transportation planning process, including: Highway Safety Improvement Program and strategic highway safety plan
State asset management plan for the NHS
State freight plan
CMAQ performance plan
Congestion management process and plan
Transit asset management plan
Public transportation agency safety plan
NOTE: For more information, please see 23 CFR 450.206 and 23 CFR 450.306
16
Evaluating Past Condition and Performance
Metropolitan and long-range statewide transportation plans (MTPs and LRSTPs) shall include: Performance measures and targets System performance reports evaluating the
condition and performance of the transportation system with respect to the targets
Progress achieved by MPOs in meeting targets in comparison with system performance recorded in previous reports
NOTE: For more information, please see 23 CFR 450.216 and 23 CFR 450.324
17
Statewide and metropolitan transportation improvement programs (STIPs and TIPs) shall include, to the maximum extent practicable: Anticipated effect of the programmed
investments with respect to the performance targets
Anticipated future performance target achievement of the programmed investments
18
NOTE: For more information, please see 23 CFR 450.218 and 23 CFR 450.326
Anticipated Future Target Achievement
Phasing-In Planning and Performance Measures
Final FHWA Rule
Effective Date
States Set Targets By
MPOs Set Targets By
LRSTP, MTP, STIP and TIP Inclusion
Planning May 27, 2016 N/A N/A May 27, 2018
Safety Performance
Measures (PM1)
April 14, 2016 August 31, 2017
Up to 180 days after the State(s) sets targets, but not later than
February 27, 2018
Updates or amendments
on or after May 27, 2018
Pavement and Bridge Condition
Performance Measures
(PM2)
May 20, 2017 May 20, 2018
No later than 180 days after
the State(s) sets targets
Updates or amendments
on or after May 20, 2019
System Performance,
Freight, and CMAQ Performance
Measures (PM3)
May 20, 2017 May 20, 2018
No later than 180 days after
the State(s) sets targets
Updates or amendments
on or after May 20, 2019 N
OTE:
For
mor
e in
form
atio
n, p
leas
e se
e 23
CFR
450
.226
and
23
CFR
450.
340
19
Important PBPP Timelines TIPs or STIPs amended or updated on or after 5/27/2018
must meet the PBPP planning requirements [81 FR 34050] for the safety performance measures.
MTPs or LRSTPs adopted on or after 5/27/2018 must meet the PBPP planning requirements [81 FR 34050] for the safety performance measures.
TIPs or STIPs amended or updated on or after 10/1/2018 must meet the PBPP planning requirements for FTA's Transit Asset Management Final Rule [81 FR 48890].
20
Important PBPP Timelines MTPs or LRSTPs adopted on or after 10/1/2018 must meet the PBPP planning
requirements for FTA's Transit Asset Management Final Rule [81 FR 48890].
TIPs or STIPs amended or updated on or after 5/20/2019 must meet the PBPP planning requirements for the Second Performance Management Measures Final Rule (PM2) [82 FR 5886] and the Third Performance Management Measures Final Rule (PM3) [82 FR 5970].
MTPs or LRSTPs adopted on or after 5/20/2019 must meet the PBPP planning requirements for the Second Performance Management Measures Final Rule (PM2) [82 FR 5886] and the Third Performance Management Measures Final Rule (PM3) [82 FR 5970].
21
Development of Checklists for MPO and State DOT (FAST Act Compliance)
22
Annotated Checklist for FAST Act Compliance (April 2018)
23
FAST ACT Workshops & Webinar Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) and FHWA Texas Division provided a statewide
webinar on FAST Act compliance requirements on February 15, 2018.
On-site MPO 101- FAST Act Workshops/Meetings held in: Abilene, TX - (January 11, 2018) Amarillo, TX - (March 28, 2018) Beaumont, TX - (May 26, 2016) Laredo, TX - (April 27, 2017) Permian Basin/Midland, TX - (December 18, 2017) Pharr, TX - (April 16, 2018) San Angelo, TX - (February 8, 2018)
TEMPO Meetings on: 1) July 21, 2016; 2) February 7, 2017; 3) July 17, 2017; 4) November 9, 2017; and 5) March 2, 2018
24
25 Status of Tri-Party MOUs, Safety Target Adoption, and TAM (Transit)- as of May 31, 2018
Lessons Learned Identify Deadlines: deadline for meeting FAST Act metropolitan and statewide planning
requirements (by May 27, 2018), including having the MOU agreements in-place has now passed. Next deadline for addressing TAM (transit SGR targets) is by October 1, 2018.
Start Early: coordinate with all agencies involved in the process.
Develop a Checklist: to ensure consistency across all MPOs.
Provide Written Examples: provided examples of MOU templates/checklists.
Have Written Correspondence: to all MPO directors to ensure timely action and clearly communicate potential consequences of inaction (joint letter of January 2018).
26
FHWA Resources 27
Introductory Trainings Technical Trainings Trainings in Development
NHI-151053 Transportation Planning Process
NHI-138007 PBPP
NHI-138004 TPM Overview for the MAP-21 and FAST Acts
NHI-136106 Introduction to Transportation Asset Management (web-based) and instructor-led
NHI-138011 The Role of Data in TPM
NHI-138012 Effective Target Setting for TPM
NHI-138006 TPM for Safety
NHI-138005 TPM Overview (web-based)
NHI-138008 TPM for Bridges
NHI-138009 TPM for Pavement
NHI-138010 TPM for Congestion (Including Freight)
NHI-131106 Transportation Asset Management
= NHI Courses Held in Texas at TxDOT Riverside Campus in FY 18
TPM State Workshops
TPM State Workshops are one-and-a-half-day workshops that use a structured TPM Capability Maturity Model (CMM) assessment tool to help transportation agencies and planning organizations identify and address gaps in their ability to deliver a transportation performance management program.
The workshops use the TPM CMM, TPM Guidebook, and other relevant TPM resources to create a customized agenda that meets the needs of the requesting State (including the SDOT, MPOs, and other partners).
28
Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Assistance
Peer-to-Peer (P2P) assistance activities facilitate TPM technology and knowledge transfer among participating transportation agencies.
The program emphasizes peer learning by facilitating more interactions where Leading Agencies and Opportunity Agencies can work together to advance the TPM and Performance-based Planning and Programming (PbPP) state-of-the-practice.
29
TPM Toolbox (Guidebook/Resources/Self-Assessment) https://www.tpmtools.org/
30
The ten TPM components are shown to the right, numbered 01-06 and lettered A-D. Each component relates to the others in particular ways, indicated by arrows and position within the Framework.
While components are numbered from 01-06 and A-D for ease of reference, TPM activities do not necessarily happen in order.
The figure illustrates some of the linkages and feedback loops that are inherent in TPM. On the website, you can click on the components to explore the framework through the TPM Guidebook.
TPM Framework
31 https://www.tpmtools.org/
Frequently Asked Questions 32
See Frequently Asked Questions on TPM at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tpm/faq.cfm
Contact Information
Kirk D. Fauver Planning & Research
Engineer FHWA Texas Division
300 E. 8th Street, Room 826 Austin, Texas 78701
PH: 512-536-5952
FAX: 512-536-5990 E-Mail: [email protected]
33