..is a jumpstart to that vision.

Perhaps

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/e

ye-o

peni

ng/

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/6

32-2

/the

-dan

delio

n-eff

ect/

Perhaps

wakes us up. keeps us awake/alive.

..is a jumpstart to that vision.

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/6

32-2

/con

nect

-peo

ple/

Too often mark becomes a sign of sameness. We seek a mark/diploma/grade. We hope to earn value by being marked/stamped/approved/checked-off. We think/hope that makes us distinguishable, but perhaps, it’s perpetuating an asleep sameness.

Become fit to be sold/marketed? Is that what we really want/need/crave..?

Perhaps what our souls desire.. is simply being useful/beautiful/honest. No show, no fluff. Just doing what we can’t not do, our art/part/fittingness.

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/p

olic

y-gl

ossa

ry/

How to give everyone a go…

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/s

tarfi

sh-n

ess/

..has shown us what happens when you provide access/resources to children, trust them, and pretty much leave them alone..

..has shown us what happens when you allow communities to tap into basic infrastructure , trust them, and pretty much leave them alone..

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/i

wan

-baa

n/

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/s

ugat

a-m

itra-

ted-

wis

h-20

13/

Imagine 7 billion people awake in

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/6

32-2

/art

-ists

-and

-bot

-ists

/

Perhaps we’re getting in the way, making this all too difficult/clouded.

People are stressed, not themselves, poor, dying, disengaged, disenchanted, .. asleep.

What if the solution is to stop spinning. What if the solution is to give trust a chance. No more prep, training, management. No more meetings, organizing, elevator pitching. Lobbying, begging, campaigning.

What if we trust the findings of many, that mirror Sugata’s and Iwan’s, and we give trust a go. What if we let go of being in charge of people, and simply be about setting them free.

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/6

32-2

/cul

ture

-of-

trus

t/

imagine

eareyehandarmfoot...you

ear to be an eareye to be an eyehand to be a handarm to be an armfoot to be a foot...you to be you

1/ a city-wide experiment, to provide an ecosystem of

eclectic people/resources;

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/6

32-2

/in-

the-

city

/What if we try a different experiment.. a city/people set free..

2/ an as-the-day experiment, rather than adding something to

the day (after hours/school/work).

*well. 100% minus 33 min. so 97.7% your day.

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/6

32-2

/as-

the-

day/

Suppose we jumpstart/sustain ..

by first/simultaneously/at-least..

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/u

pcyc

ling-

educ

ation

-res

ourc

es/

Most districts average 500 policies they must comply with to garner public ed funding. The most well-known/referenced policies being: seat time & test scores.

What if we prototype a city/district getting funding via just 2 policies. Ones that address two fundamental human needs – attachment & authenticity:

community buy-in to have these daily conversations: if everyone is having these 2 convos every day, 30+3 min, the rest of day is theirs. plus - they get suggested connections everyday from the 3 min data. plus they get free access to and input for resources throughout the city.

government/powers-that-be buy-in for ongoing funding: if having these 2 daily convos works, (enlivens the city: less crime/poverty/health issues/etc), the city/district gets funded per census, rather than seat time & test scores, et al.

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/6

32-2

/pub

lic/

setting people

http:

//re

defin

esch

ool.c

om/n

o-ag

enda

/

for more on intent/meaning behind words/phrases.. they can be searched at