uoft_undergrad_case_comp_training_2008-01-08

Upload: ravijanakiraman9693

Post on 08-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    1/66

    2005 Deloitte Inc.

    Logical StructuringCase Competition Training

    Strategy and Operations

    January 8, 2008

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    2/66

    2

    Logical Structuring Agenda

    Purpose and Objectives

    Logical Structuring & Storyboarding

    Quantitative and Qualitative Observations

    Professionalism

    Dos and Donts

    Appendix

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    3/66

    3

    Purpose

    The purpose of this session is to help prepare you for this weeks casecompetition.

    Objectives

    By the end of this session you should have a better understanding of:

    How to logically structure a case presentation:

    Logical Structuring & Storyboarding

    How to use quantitative and qualitative data to support your research

    Research Tips

    Example

    How to execute a successful presentation:

    Professionalism

    Examples of previous presentations:

    DOs & DONTs

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    4/66

    4

    Logical Structuring Agenda

    Purpose and Objectives

    Logical Structuring & Storyboarding

    Quantitative and Qualitative Observations

    Professionalism

    Dos and Donts

    Appendix

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    5/66

    5

    Why does structure matter?

    1.Makes the message precise

    Forces the writer to be dead clear about what they arecommunicating to the reader, preventing messages that are unclear,unintended, or intellectually empty

    2.Reveals gaps in thinking

    Enables the writer to identify gaps by anticipating and responding tothe readers questions before the communication is delivered

    3.Provides clarity to the reader

    Prevents the reader from working to understand the message,thereby eliminating the possibility that your message is misunderstoodor ignored entirely

    Memo A

    John Collins telephoned to say he cant make themeeting at 9:00. Hal Johnson says he doesntmind making it later or even tomorrow, but notbefore 10:30 and Don Clifford wont return fromFrankfurt until tomorrow late. The conferenceroom is booked tomorrow, but free on Thursday.Thursday at 11:00 looks to be a good time. Is thatokay with you?

    Memo BCould we reschedule todays 9:00 meetingto Thursday at 11:00? This would make itmore convenient for Collins and Johnson,and would permit Clifford to be present. Itis also the only other time this week thatthe conference room is free.

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    6/66

    6

    Governing Thought:States the answer to the questionraised in the readers mind

    Key Line:Major points which, takentogether prove the answer

    The Pyramid Structure

    Support:Data and facts whichsupport the key line

    Explains howor why

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    7/66

    7

    Opportunitiesand threats

    ABC should go online

    and the first priority should be to

    defend its current market share

    Primary benefitsof the internet

    strategy

    An Unstructured Communication

    ABCs currentcustomers aremore likely toshop online

    than thegeneral

    population

    ABCscompetitors

    are increasing

    their onlineproductassortment

    Without anonline channel

    ABC risks

    losing somecustomers tocompetitors

    ABCs onlinesales in 2005

    could reach$100mm

    Defend

    market share

    Grow

    revenue

    Developdeeper

    relationships

    withcustomers

    Support ABCsoperating

    strategy

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    8/66

    8

    Acme can reduce costs by

    $10mm in the next 2 years

    through some operational

    improvements

    Differentiate servicelevels to save $2mm

    Segment

    customersby value

    Determineeconomiclevel of

    service foreach

    segment

    Shift lowervalue

    segmentsto lower

    costchannels

    Re-engineer corefunctions to save $5mm

    Evaluateinternal

    cost ofcore

    function

    Comparecost of

    function tobest-in-

    classbenchmarks

    Adopt bestpracticesbased on

    benchmarks

    Outsource non-corefunctions to save $3mm

    Select

    non-corefunctions

    Evaluatecost andservicelevel of

    potentialpartners

    Chooseone

    partner foreach

    function

    A Structured Communication

    Governing Thought:

    Key Line:

    Support:

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    9/66

    Copyright 2006 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. 9

    1. Ideas at any level must be summaries of the ideas grouped below Derived from high-level ideas

    Point of a paragraph is a summary of the sentences it contains

    2. Idea in each grouping must always be the same kind of ideas

    All ideas are from the same logical grouping

    Label idea with a plural noun

    3. Ideas in each grouping must be in a logical order

    Deductively

    Chronologically

    Structurally

    Comparatively

    Three Key Rules to ApplyWhen Building a Pyramid

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    10/66

    10

    Answer

    A statement about thesubject with which you knowthe reader will agree

    The complicating event thatcreate the tension in thestory

    Situation:

    Complication:

    The implicit question thatresults from the complication

    Question:

    Elements of the Introduction

    Governing Thought:

    Key Line:

    Support:

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    11/66

    11

    Acme must develop avalue proposition tailored

    to the coyote market.

    Understand the uniqueneeds of coyotes

    Adapt product line to meetcoyote needs

    Educate coyotes on Acmesability to meet their needs

    How?

    Structuring a Response to How

    Governing Thought:

    Key Line:

    S: Acme must increase itsfocus on the coyote market

    C: Acme is not currentlyfocused on the coyotemarket

    Q: How can Acme focus onthe coyote market?

    Step 1 Step 2 Step 3

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    12/66

    12

    DrugsRUs should spend$25 million to acceleratethe approval process for

    Antizak

    The Antizak market isexpected to top $1 billion

    per year

    Earlier approval allowsDrugRUs more time

    before patent protectionexpires, which is worth$200 million in profit

    Competitors aredeveloping a substitutethat may capture the

    market if launched first

    Why?

    Structuring a Response to Why

    S: Approval for DrugsRUsnew lifestyle drug Antizakis taking longer thanexpected

    C: DrugsRUs can spend $25million to accelerate theapproval process

    Q: Should DrugsRUs spend$25 million to accelerate

    the approval process?

    Reason 1 Reason 2 Reason 3

    Governing Thought:

    Key Line:

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    13/66

    13

    S: The plant is not meeting its widget production goals

    C: The production line is frequently stopped because of insufficient parts

    Q: What should the plant do differently?

    A: The parts procurement process needs to be redesigned to reduce fulfillment time

    S: Sows Ear Inc. developed a silk purse product line 2 years ago

    C: Since then, the silk purse division has been unprofitable

    Q: What should Sows Ear do?A: Sows Ear Inc. should abandon its silk purse product line

    S: ABC, a book retailer, is considering developing an online channel

    C: The online retail book market is dominated by 2 strong players

    Q: Should ABC develop an online channel?

    A: Yes, ABC should go online

    S: You have undertaken a number of initiatives to improve customer service

    C: Customer service continues to result in decreased customer satisfaction

    Q: How can we improve customers service?

    A: We must redesign customer service

    Which Question is Raised - How or Why?

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    14/66

    14

    Clarifying Grouped Ideas

    List the PointsIdentify the

    Type ofPointSummarize the

    PointsOrder the

    Points

    Synthesize

    findings frominterviews,

    research and

    analysis

    Create a list

    of key points

    Put the points

    into categoriesby defining the

    kind of problem

    being discussed,

    attempting to

    use similar level

    of abstraction

    across

    categories

    Write a

    sentence thatstates the

    essence of

    each category

    Put the points in

    logical order,such as order of

    importance or

    time order

    Activities:

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    15/66

    15

    The Importance ofMECE

    MECE

    Mutually

    Exclusive

    Do any of the points

    overlap?

    Example

    Making Dinner:

    Select menu

    Buy ingredient

    Prepare courses

    Collectively

    Exhaustive

    Have all possibilities

    been covered?

    Mobile Phone Types:

    Analog Digital

    GSM

    Reasons to acquire competitor ABC:

    Complimentary customer base

    Superior technology

    Digestible size

    Points across horizontal levels of the pyramid should be MECE(Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    16/66

    16

    Storyboarding

    Creating a storyboard provides an outline for the presentation and the pathyou will follow:

    Uses Pyramid Structure as a foundation

    Maps out the storyline of a presentation

    Establishes team and judging panels expectations about what is to be

    produced and delivered

    Helps organize work and define data needs

    Establishes evaluation frameworks and criteria used in the assessment

    Facilitates greater productivity and higher quality

    Keeps an engagement focused

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    17/66

    17

    Creating the Storyboard

    Cutting Edge Corporationshould close its razor

    manufacturing operationin Wisconsin and

    manufacture razors inMexico

    Overall costs in Mexico are75% lower than in

    Wisconsin,resulting in recovery of

    moving costs in 6 months

    Key Line:

    Governing Thought:

    Mexico provides anoperating environment thatis as stable as Wisconsin,

    ensuring continuity ofoperations

    Manufacturing technology ismore advanced in Mexico

    than in Wisconsin, enablingCutting Edge to leverageleading edge capabilities

    Support:

    One page for each idea

    Page 2

    Page 1SituationComplication(Question)

    Eachrequiresa set-up

    page

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    18/66

    18

    Logical Structuring Agenda

    Purpose and Objectives

    Logical Structuring & Storyboarding

    Quantitative and Qualitative Observations

    Professionalism

    Dos and Donts

    Appendix

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    19/66

    19

    Quantitative and Qualitative Observations

    Definition Examples Sources

    Quantitative

    Numerical and statistical

    Most suitable when theobjective is to measure orquantify data

    Answers the what questions

    Firm stock value

    Market share

    Net Present Value

    financialstatements

    statistical studies

    surveys

    censuses

    Qualitative

    Interpretive and insightful

    Most helpful when the goal isto understand situations orprovide context

    Answers the how and why"questions

    Pending lawsuits

    Consumer trends

    Market perception

    press releases

    annual reports

    industry whitepapers

    analyst reports

    Its important to use both quantitative and qualitative observations to support

    your recommendation Qualitative data and analysis is required as hard justification for your

    recommendation (e.g., dollar savings, head count reduction)

    Qualitative data can be used to support and explain the meaning of quantitativeresearch

    Combining methods leads to a balanced, persuasive argument

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    20/66

    20

    Research Tips

    Structuring your research using a defined approach can help you research

    effectively in a short period of time Several models can be applied to help you structure your research. One

    example is Porters Five Forces

    Your approach to case research should mirror the logical structuring ofyour presentation

    Governing Thought (Recommendation) Key Lines Support

    But how do you know what your recommendations are before conductingyour research?

    Answer: Guess.

    Based on your initial impressions of the case, generate some hypotheses onwhat you think the company should do. Then, based on your hypotheses,look for supporting evidence

    The advantage of this approach is that it can dramatically reduce the amount

    of time spent on research. You will be focusing your efforts on facts thatsupport your hypotheses

    Begin by creating a research log

    This is a file that documents all of the research sources that have beenreviewed and includes a summary of key findings, facts and sourcinginformation. A research log allows for easy dissemination of key findingssaving time. Assign a format and owner up front

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    21/66

    21

    Example

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    22/66

    22

    Logical Structuring Agenda

    Purpose and Objectives

    Logical Structuring & Storyboarding

    Quantitative and Qualitative Observations

    Professionalism

    Dos and Donts

    Appendix

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    23/66

    23

    Professionalism Execution of the presentation

    There are two key avenues for case competitors to convey professionalism:

    (1)The execution of the presentation

    (2)The presentation materials

    Assign roles early subject matter experts and presenters

    Who answers questions on which topics?

    Rehearse the presentation to clearly define: Sequence what order will the team members will present in?

    Duration how long should each section take?

    Hand-offs how will each section of the presentation smoothly andlogically transition from one team member to the next?

    Contingency plan which sections could be reduced or eliminated?

    Pay special attention to numbers, statistics, charts and analysis

    Inability to convincingly defend figures is a common pitfall

    Be able to recall sources and assumptions without having to usereference material

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    24/66

    24

    Professionalism Presentation Materials

    Alignment

    Check text and object alignment to ensure a consistent look across slides

    Ensure headings and text boxes are in the same place, as you flip throughyour slides

    Colour Scheme

    A muted colour scheme is generally recommended

    Avoid dark backgrounds, very bright colours or too many colours

    Ensure that your colour scheme both prints well and projects well

    Font

    Sans-serif font styles tend to work best: Arial, Verdana, Tahoma

    Font size should be readable, but not too large (min ~12pt)

    Consistency

    Be consistent with font size, font style and colour scheme

    Be consistent with punctuation at the end of bullets - Either use it or donot, but do not use it inconsistently

    Be consistent with overall structurei.e. use of tag lines versus justheaders

    Use the slide master to create a template to ensure consistency

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    25/66

    25

    Logical Structuring Agenda

    Purpose and Objectives

    Logical Structuring & Storyboarding

    Quantitative and Qualitative Observations

    Professionalism

    Dos and Donts

    Appendix

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    26/66

    26

    DOs & DONTs

    DOs

    Brainstorm as a team to develop a strategy and agree to an execution plan

    Divide and conquer the work to efficiently execute on the plan

    Determine required tasks, dependencies and agree to roles for each teammember

    Have each person create their slides based on an agreed upon template(designed in Slide Master)

    Avoid version control issues by having one person own the master andothers provide send over their slides for inclusion in the master

    Proof-read your presentation for spelling, grammar, content and logic

    Recognize each others strengths in determining roles for the presentation

    Group members should present material they are most comfortable with

    Confident speakers can present larger portions of the presentation

    Leave time to rest the night before the presentation

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    27/66

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    28/66

    28

    Question

    In early 2006, managers in technology and media companies around the worldobserved Google with awe, envy, and fear. The companys opportunities seemedboundless. What would Google do next?

    Two Options

    One option was to stay focused on the companys distinctive competence:developing superior search solutions and monetizing those solutions throughtargeted advertising.

    Alternatively, Google could branch into new arenas:

    Build Google into a portal like Yahoo! Or MSN by aggregating content intothematic channels

    Extend Googles role in e-commerce beyondsearch into a more activerole as an intermediary facilitating transactions

    Challenge Microsofts hegemony over thePCdesktop by developingproducts to compete with Office and Windows

    Last Years Case Competition Topic

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    29/66

    29

    Evaluation Criteria

    Recommendation

    Followed logically from analysis

    Dealt with all issues raised

    Used decision criteria

    Showed sounds business judgment

    End result was practical/realistic

    Question & Answer

    Answered question posed

    Provided convincing explanations

    Admitted weakness

    Answered as a team

    Analysis

    Identified key problems

    Used supporting facts/data

    Drew accurate conclusions

    Considered risk

    Offered original insights

    Presentation

    Spoke clearly and concisely

    Structured storyline well

    Slides were visually attractive

    Showed enthusiasm and professionalism

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    30/66

    30

    Last Years 2nd Place Case

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    31/66

    31

    Bright Colour Scheme

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    32/66

    32

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    33/66

    33

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    34/66

    34

    1. Communicate recommendation in thebeginning of the presentation

    2. Set expectations

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    35/66

    35

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    36/66

    36

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    37/66

    37

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    38/66

    38

    Evaluate each recommendationagainst the 3 criteria

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    39/66

    39

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    40/66

    40

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    41/66

    41

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    42/66

    42

    Data Sourcing

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    43/66

    43

    PrettyPie Chart

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    44/66

    44

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    45/66

    45

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    46/66

    46

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    47/66

    47

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    48/66

    48

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    49/66

    49

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    50/66

    50

    Last Years Winning Case

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    51/66

    Terry Huang

    Aron Lau

    Ke Zhang

    Godmans Chow

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    52/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    What is the situation?

    Question:W

    hat should Google do?

    Complication: Company is facing boundlessopportunities.

    Stay focused with Googles distinctive competencies.Branch into new arenas.

    Recommendation: Google should stay with its core

    competencies providing superior search solutions$6.5 billion by end of 2011

    Agenda

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    53/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    Overview of the approach

    What shouldGoogle do?

    Branch intonew areas

    Extend

    Googles coresearch &targeting

    competencies.

    InternationalSearch

    MobileAdvertising

    NarrowcastingBuild Googleinto a portal

    Extend

    Googles roleinto e-

    commerce

    Develop

    Products toCompete withOffice &

    Windows

    Use Pyramid

    Structure toFrame theStoryboard

    Measurement

    Metrics:

    Market Potential

    Fit with Mission

    Option 1 Option 2

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    54/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    Google should stay focus with its core competence

    Driven by Company PhilosophyIt is best to do one thing really, really well developing superior search

    solutions

    Market PotentialHas opportunity to further monetize its search solutions through

    targeted advertising

    U.S. and International Internet Users Forecas

    (million users)

    2003E 2004E 2005E 2006E 2007E 2008E 2009E

    Time

    U

    International

    U.S. and International aid arket Search

    Forecast ($ billions)

    2 54 3

    6 48

    9 66

    3 42 5

    0 27 9

    5 93 3

    50 6

    2003E 2004E 2005E 2006E 2007E 2008E 2009E

    Time

    U Market InternationalMarket

    Charts data sourced from provided Business Case Description

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    55/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    Google should not branch into new arenas. The three arenas proposed deviates from the companymission, or have tremendous risks (market potential).

    Googles mission - To organize the worlds information and make it

    universally accessible and useful.

    Build Google into aportal

    Were not in the portalbusiness, were in thebusiness of making allthe worlds informationaccessible and useful.

    - Schemidt

    Develop products tocompete with Office and

    Windows

    There is strategicleverage in building an

    ecosystem aroundcontent and advertisingthat is an extension ofour search mission.

    - Schemidt

    xtend Googles role ine-commerce

    Acting as anintermediary facilitatingtransactions (Google

    Checkout) is consistentwith the mission of the

    company.

    Inconsistent Font

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    56/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    Google should not extend in e-commerce or develop products to compete with Microsoft due to thehigh risks (market potential) involved.

    xtend Googles role in e-commerce

    1. Strong competition:eBay has 39.2% of the e-commerce market. eBay facilitates eCommerce byoffering tools such as PayPal1.

    PayPal has 24% market share of U.S. online payments market. It is eBaysmajor electronic payment method1.

    2. No incentive for PayPal users to switch to using Google Checkout3. Despite Google Checkouts launch in June, 2006. PayPal posted revenues

    of $417 million, a 37% growth rate compared with 2005s fourth quarter2

    .

    1Wikipedia.org

    2 CNN.com

    InconsistentAlignment

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    57/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    Google should not extend in e-commerce or develop products to compete with Microsoft due to thehigh risks (market potential) involved.

    1. Strong competition:Microsoft2. Difficult for new entrant: OpenOffice currently only has 14% of the enterprise

    software market as of 2004 Hard to convince user to switch to newdesktop applications1

    3. Relatively small potential revenueThe market forOffice is only an annual revenue of $1 billion1

    Too small of a market size comparing to Google's currently advertisingbusiness (140 million vs. 6.1 billion)

    Develop products to compete with Office and Windows

    1Wikipedia.org

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    58/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    Google should continue to strengthen its expansion into the international online advertisementmarket.

    nline ds Spending Growth Rate har

    ime

    GrowthRate%

    orth merica

    Western

    uropesia

    atin merica

    ustralia/

    e ealandTotal

    S s International Internet sers in millions

    ime

    . .

    nternational

    . . internet user is % of all users in the

    orld.By , it ill decrease and become

    . %.

    . . online ads spending slo ed do n

    recently hile online ads spending from theinternational market are increasing at a

    faster speed.

    eMarket.comeMarket.com

    The Winning Case UsedExtensive DATA to Back

    Up its Statement

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    59/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    International Online Advertising ntry Analysis

    Who is thecompetition?

    How do theirproducts &

    services differ

    What are thepotential

    barriers to entry

    How does Googlebecome a player?

    What are the ris s

    Yahoo, MSN,Local search

    engines (Baidu)

    Google'scompetitorsentered the

    market earlier,and tailored

    products to adaptto local customers.

    Perhapsgovernmentregulations(censorship

    issue in China)

    Partner with localcompanies,leverage our

    leading technology,and adapt to local

    environment.

    Late to the game.Lack of

    understanding of thelocal environment

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    60/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    We believe the emerging mobile advertising market is a fit for both Googles technological expertiseand philosophies.

    The potential of the mobile user base is

    promising, projected to rise to 1 billionusers of 3G data services by 2011.

    o ile d e enues

    2,900 00

    millions

    1,400 00

    millions

    200 2011

    3G ser ase

    100 users

    millions

    1,000

    users

    millions

    200 2011

    Mobile advertising revenues is

    expected to reach $2.9 billiondollars by 2011.

    Asia urope Business: 3G in the world : June 20th 200 TVweek.com: Nov 15th 200

    More Data!!

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    61/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    Mobile advertising market analysis before entry.

    W b li th i ti k t i fit f b th G l t h l i l ti d

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    62/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    We believe the emerging narrowcasting market is a fit for both Googles technological expertise andphilosophies.

    nline Gaming d orth

    $500

    million

    $100million

    2006 2010

    S Narrowcasting e enue

    $450

    million

    $750

    million

    2006 200

    Narrowcasting revenue in the US isprojected to reach $1.2 billion by

    200 - >$700 million innetwork software operations.

    Targeted online gaming advertising worth

    is projected to be worth $0.5 billion by2010.

    CapV InfoStats March 2005Businessweek Jan 2007

    Even More Data!!!

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    63/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    Narrowcasting market analysis before entry

    Who is thecompetition?

    How do theirproducts & services

    differ

    What are the potentialbarriers to entry

    How do we become a player?What arethe ris s?

    K3, Scala,ipSigns

    Current infrastructureof fixed targeted

    content that is notuser targeted

    Privacy concerns,government billboardregulations, aesthetic

    trends

    Partner with existing players,leverage Googles user targetedalgorithms for more targeted ads.

    Inaccurateforecast of

    market.

    Changinggovernmentregulations

    on publicads.

    G l h t t th i t ti l li hi d d ti i k t ith

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    64/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    Google can approach to enter the international online searching and advertising market withrelative ease.

    To continue strength its expansion in the international online advertisement market

    Identify potential international market to expand its serviceConduct market research to understand customer behavior

    Develop localized applications and adapt to taste of local customers

    Cooperate with local business (partnership, M&A)

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    65/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    Google can approach to enter the narrowcasting and mobile advertising market with relative ease

    Tie into the current and emergingmarkets with Googles currenttechnology and infrastructure.Froogle

    GoogleMaps

    GoogleMobile

    GoogleNews

    Blogger

    GoogleServer

    argeted UserGroup/Individual

    SystemIntegrator

    Advertiser/Contents

    RetailCorporateHospitalityServices

    Public Spaces____

    Gamers____

    Mobile device users

    San Fran Wifi____

    Game developers____

    Mobile service providersAnyone

    InconsistentFont

  • 8/7/2019 UofT_Undergrad_Case_Comp_Training_2008-01-08

    66/66

    Introduction New frontiers? Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Growth Strategy Implementation

    Googles projected growth in the next 5 years

    MobileAdvertising :

    $1.0B(assuming1 3 market

    share)

    Narrowcasting:

    $0.5B(assuming 1 3market share)

    International

    Search$ .98B ($2.4B

    market with 20%annual growth)

    Combinedrevenue growthof an additional

    $6.5B by theend of 2011.

    Clear VisualRepresentation

    RecommendationAgain Backed Up

    by DATA!