untangling a web: the internet gets a new look

1
SCIENCE NEWS 230 OCTOBER 8, 2005 VOL. 168 components, Dravid expects his system to be useful in biological research. Unlike other scanning-probe micro- scopes, the acoustically enhanced system doesn’t require the tip to come in con- tact with the surface. Therefore, it can be used on “soft” structures, such as cells, says Dravid. —A. CUNNINGHAM Untangling a Web The Internet gets a new look The Internet may be everywhere and nowhere, but that’s not stopping informa- tion engineers from mapping it. An atlas that accurately shows the physical path of information from one computer to another could protect the Internet from massive failures after, say, an earthquake or a ter- rorist attack. The latest finding by Internet cartographers offers some good news: Routing computers—the hardware that directs bits of information around the world—are linked in a way that makes the Internet less susceptible to a centralized attack than past studies had indicated. In an upcoming issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, John Doyle of the California Institute of Tech- nology in Pasadena and his colleagues offer a new mathematical model of the Internet. The team used a class of models known as HOT, for highly optimized tolerance. This approach differs from the so-called scalefree models that many Internet mod- elers have favored (SN: 1/29/05, p. 68). Extrapolating from small local networks, the scalefree model indicates that a few well-connected master routers direct Inter- net traffic to numerous, less essential routers in the network’s periphery. The model predicts that over time, the busy cen- tral routers acquire ever more links in a rich-get-richer effect. From a security per- spective, a targeted attack on a central router could halt virtually all data flow in such an Internet. Doyle and his team present a HOT model in which the Internet has no vulnerable cen- tralized hubs and any highly connected routers lie at the periphery. If one of these well-connected, outlying routers were taken out, Internet traffic would simply divert to another well-connected router. That approach incorporates current tech- nological and economic constraints on the Internet. For instance, routers are limited in the amount of information that they can direct at any given instant. Additionally, Internet-service providers that own major routers can allocate only limited resources to their hardware. By optimizing these fac- tors in their model, Doyle and his cowork- ers aim to present a picture that matches today’s Internet. The team has tested its model with the known map of Internet2—an academic subnet- work within the larger Internet. The researchers report that their proposed model corresponds well to the structure of Internet2, which Doyle says is a “good rep- resentation” of the struc- ture of the entire Internet. Identifying the strengths and weaknesses of different Internet architectures is important, says Fan Chung of the University of Califor- nia, San Diego. She notes that HOT models can also be used to analyze other complex net- works, such as the immune system and protein interactions. Although the researchers’ model reveals that the Internet ought to efficiently adapt even if the busiest routers were removed, Doyle notes that the system is still vul- nerable to hijacking via malicious software that leaves the hardware intact. Even in that case, however, a good map could help Internet custodians track harmful soft- ware and ultimately protect the Internet against it. —K. GREENE Fertility and Pollution Dirty air, ozone linked to sperm troubles Men might improve their fertility by reduc- ing how much pollution they breathe in. The dirtier the air, the lower a man’s sperm count and the more sperm with fragmented DNA he produces, two new studies suggest. However, neither report directly links the decline in sperm quality to fertility problems. “The decrease is not enormous,” com- ments environmental chemist Brian McCarry of McMaster University in Hamil- ton, Ontario, who was not involved in either study. “There’s no evidence that it has an impact on fertility.” In one study, ozone appeared to be a cul- prit behind diminished sperm counts, sug- gesting that it’s a “sperm toxicant,” say Rebecca Z. Sokol of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and her colleagues. They had looked for a cor- relation between the quality of semen from 48 local sperm donors and air-quality data for the zip code in which each donor lived. The donors were healthy men who had given 10 or more donations to a sperm bank over at least a year. Sperm counts were lower when ozone con- centrations where the men lived had been high during the pre- vious 90 days, Sokol and her team report in an upcoming Environ- mental Health Perspec- tives. Sperm take nearly that long to develop. The researchers took into account the effects that temperature and season have on men’s sperm counts. Airborne particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide weren’t associated with reduced sperm concentrations, the team says. In the second study, Jiri Rubes and two of his colleagues at the Veterinary Research Institute in Brno, Czech Republic, worked with U.S. scientists. They examined up to seven semen samples from each of 36 men living in a polluted region of the Czech Republic. Each September for 3 consecutive years, the researchers collected a sample from most of the men. The team took as many as four more samples from each man during the two winters of the study. Wintertime pollutant concentrations in the region can be double to quadruple those measured in September. In most winter-air samples, a cubic meter contained 60 to 80 micrograms each of par- ticulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide and about 150 nanograms of poly- cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, exceeding common regulatory limits. Semen samples had more fragmented DNA at those times than they did in September, the team reports in the October Human Reproduction. “This is certainly an important finding,” says Ashok Agarwal of the Cleveland Clinic. DNA damage to sperm has been linked to low pregnancy rates, although the damage found in the Czech study may not have been enough to impair fertility, he says. Despite the heavy pollution, the researchers found no differences in sperm counts or several other measures of sperm quality. But, McCarry notes, “they didn’t measure the ozone.” —B. HARDER SCIENCE NEWS This Week PNAS NET WORKS The Internet doesn’t have centralized master routers, according to a new analysis. Its distributed structure, as depicted here, protects it against a widely debilitating failure.

Upload: katie-greene

Post on 02-Oct-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Untangling a web: The internet gets a new look

S C I E N C E N E W S2 3 0 O C T O B E R 8 , 2 0 0 5 V O L . 1 6 8

components, Dravid expects his systemto be useful in biological research.Unlike other scanning-probe micro-scopes, the acoustically enhanced systemdoesn’t require the tip to come in con-tact with the surface. Therefore, it can beused on “soft” structures, such as cells,says Dravid. —A. CUNNINGHAM

Untangling a Web The Internet gets a new look

The Internet may be everywhere andnowhere, but that’s not stopping informa-tion engineers from mapping it. An atlasthat accurately shows the physical path ofinformation from one computer to anothercould protect the Internet from massivefailures after, say, an earthquake or a ter-rorist attack. The latest finding by Internetcartographers offers some good news:Routing computers—the hardware thatdirects bits of information around theworld—are linked in a way that makes theInternet less susceptible to a centralizedattack than past studies had indicated.

In an upcoming issue of the Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences, JohnDoyle of the California Institute of Tech-nology in Pasadena and his colleagues offera new mathematical model of the Internet.The team used a class of models known asHOT, for highly optimized tolerance.

This approach differs from the so-calledscalefree models that many Internet mod-elers have favored (SN: 1/29/05, p. 68).Extrapolating from small local networks,the scalefree model indicates that a fewwell-connected master routers direct Inter-net traffic to numerous, less essentialrouters in the network’s periphery. Themodel predicts that over time, the busy cen-tral routers acquire ever more links in arich-get-richer effect. From a security per-spective, a targeted attack on a centralrouter could halt virtually all data flow insuch an Internet.

Doyle and his team present a HOT modelin which the Internet has no vulnerable cen-tralized hubs and any highly connectedrouters lie at the periphery. If one of thesewell-connected, outlying routers were takenout, Internet traffic would simply divert toanother well-connected router.

That approach incorporates current tech-nological and economic constraints on theInternet. For instance, routers are limitedin the amount of information that they candirect at any given instant. Additionally,Internet-service providers that own majorrouters can allocate only limited resourcesto their hardware. By optimizing these fac-tors in their model, Doyle and his cowork-ers aim to present a picture thatmatches today’s Internet.

The team has tested itsmodel with the knownmap of Internet2—anacademic subnet-work within thelarger Internet. Theresearchers reportthat their proposedmodel correspondswell to the structureof Internet2, whichDoyle says is a “good rep-resentation” of the struc-ture of the entire Internet.

Identifying the strengthsand weaknesses of differentInternet architectures isimportant, says Fan Chungof the University of Califor-nia, San Diego. She notesthat HOT models can alsobe used to analyze other complex net-works, such as the immune system andprotein interactions.

Although the researchers’ model revealsthat the Internet ought to efficiently adapteven if the busiest routers were removed,Doyle notes that the system is still vul-nerable to hijacking via malicious softwarethat leaves the hardware intact. Even inthat case, however, a good map could helpInternet custodians track harmful soft-ware and ultimately protect the Internetagainst it. —K. GREENE

Fertility and Pollution Dirty air, ozone linkedto sperm troubles

Men might improve their fertility by reduc-ing how much pollution they breathe in.The dirtier the air, the lower a man’s spermcount and the more sperm with fragmentedDNA he produces, two new studies suggest.

However, neither report directly links thedecline in sperm quality to fertility problems.

“The decrease is not enormous,” com-ments environmental chemist BrianMcCarry of McMaster University in Hamil-ton, Ontario, who was not involved in eitherstudy. “There’s no evidence that it has animpact on fertility.”

In one study, ozone appeared to be a cul-prit behind diminished sperm counts, sug-gesting that it’s a “sperm toxicant,” sayRebecca Z. Sokol of the University ofSouthern California in Los Angeles andher colleagues. They had looked for a cor-relation between the quality of semen from48 local sperm donors and air-quality datafor the zip code in which each donor lived.

The donors were healthy men whohad given 10 or more donations

to a sperm bank over atleast a year.

Sperm counts werelower when ozone con-centrations where themen lived had beenhigh during the pre-vious 90 days, Sokoland her team report in

an upcoming Environ-mental Health Perspec-

tives. Sperm take nearlythat long to develop. The

researchers took intoaccount the effectsthat temperatureand season have onmen’s sperm counts.Airborne particulatematter, nitrogenoxides, and carbon

monoxide weren’t associated with reducedsperm concentrations, the team says.

In the second study, Jiri Rubes and twoof his colleagues at the Veterinary ResearchInstitute in Brno, Czech Republic, workedwith U.S. scientists. They examined up toseven semen samples from each of 36 menliving in a polluted region of the CzechRepublic.

Each September for 3 consecutive years,the researchers collected a sample from mostof the men. The team took as many as fourmore samples from each man during the twowinters of the study. Wintertime pollutantconcentrations in the region can be doubleto quadruple those measured in September.

In most winter-air samples, a cubic metercontained 60 to 80 micrograms each of par-ticulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and sulfurdioxide and about 150 nanograms of poly-cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, exceedingcommon regulatory limits. Semen sampleshad more fragmented DNA at those timesthan they did in September, the team reportsin the October Human Reproduction.

“This is certainly an important finding,”says Ashok Agarwal of the Cleveland Clinic.DNA damage to sperm has been linked tolow pregnancy rates, although the damagefound in the Czech study may not have beenenough to impair fertility, he says.

Despite the heavy pollution, theresearchers found no differences in spermcounts or several other measures of spermquality. But, McCarry notes, “they didn’tmeasure the ozone.” —B. HARDER

SCIENCENEWSThis Week

PN

AS

NET WORKS The Internet doesn’thave centralized master routers,according to a new analysis. Itsdistributed structure, as depictedhere, protects it against a widelydebilitating failure.

FOBS 10-8 10/5/05 2:59 PM Page 230