unlocking the u.s. domestic airline system: operational vs … · pia lex btr rfd aza pwm lft buf...
TRANSCRIPT
Sharon L. Pinkerton, SVP-PolicyCAPA Americas Aviation SummitDenver, COMarch 18, 2019
Unlocking the U.S. Domestic Airline System: Operational vs Commercial Implications
In 2014-2018, Domestic Airline Capacity Grew at Twice the Rate of the U.S. EconomyThroughout the Business Cycle, Capacity Has Fluctuated With the Price of Crude Oil*
airlines.org
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis and published airline schedules via Diio Mi
1.6 1.1 0.2
1.6 2.3
5.1 4.9
4.0
5.4 5.0
2.6
1.6 2.2
1.8 2.5
2.9
1.6 2.2
2.9 2.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
620
10 ($
80)
2011
($11
1)
2012
($11
2)
2013
($10
9)
2014
($99
)
2015
($52
)
2016
($44
)
2017
($54
)
2018
($72
)
2019
F ($
65)
Domestic Airline Capacity (ASMs) Real US GDP
2
(Airlines 1.3%, Economy 2.0%)
(Airlines 4.8%, Economy 2.3%)
* Brent crude oil in dollars per barrel, shown next to each year
2011-2014 Crude = $108/bbl
2015-2018 Crude = $56/bbl
Post-Recession, Scheduled Service in Small Communities* Rising Again in 2019Small U.S. Airports Seeing Most Flights Since 2011, Most Seats Ever
airlines.org3
Source: Innovata (via Diio Mi) published schedules as of Mar. 1, 2019, for all airlines providing scheduled passenger service from U.S. airports to all destinations* Per https://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/passenger_allcargo_stats/categories/, U.S. airports with less than 0.25% of annual passenger boardings
Avg.
Dai
ly F
light
s (S
ched
uled
)
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Avg. Daily Seats (Scheduled)
Notes: Recession (Dec-2007–Jun-2009); FAA pilot qualification (1,500-hour) rule effective Jul-2013; pilot flight/duty/rest rule effective Jan-2014; 2019 is Jan-Sep
Flights (Left Axis)
Seats (Right Axis)
airlines.org4
Among 11 U.S. Airline Brands, Smaller Carriers Have Been Growing the FastestDifferent Types of Carriers Market Their Prices and Services Differently
(50)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
% C
hang
e in
Cap
acity
* S
ince
200
7
Spirit
Sun Ctry
HawaiianAlaska
JetBlue
Southwest
AA/DL/UA
Source: Innovata (via Diio Mi) schedules as of Oct. 5, 2018, for selected marketing airlines including predecessors
Allegiant
Frontier
* Systemwide scheduled available seat miles
Company 2019 Guide (%)Spirit 15Allegiant 7-9JetBlue 4.5-6.5Delta 5United 4-6Southwest 5American 3Hawaiian 1.5-4.5Alaska 2
Note: Guides as of 3/6/2019
airlines.org5
Smaller U.S. Carriers Are Serving More and More Domestic MarketsCompetitive Presence of Low-Cost and Ultra Low-Cost Carriers Continues to Expand
74
54 50
15
48
18
99
120
101
22
67
48
Alaska Allegiant Frontier Hawaiian JetBlue Spirit
2007 2019
Source: Innovata (via Diio Mi) schedules as of Feb. 8, 2019, for selected marketing airlines including predecessors * July 15-21 of each year
Number of U.S. Airports Served*
From 2000-2017, Global Network Carrier Domestic Share Fell From 73% to Just 53%Share (%) of U.S. Domestic Origin-and-Destination Passengers by Airline Business Model
airlines.org
Source: DOT Data Bank 1B (each airline shown on a marketing-carrier basis and tracked with its respective merged/acquired predecessors [e.g., UA/CO]
6
73 71 69 68 67 67 65 62 60 59 58 57 57 57 56 55 54 53 53
18 19 20 21 21 21 22 23 24 25 25 25 25 24 24 24 24 24 23
9 10 10 11 12 13 13 15 16 16 17 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 24
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
1H18
Global Network (AA, DL, UA) Southwest Other
Competitive Choices for Domestic Flyers Have Continued to IncreaseContrary to Some Assertions, Traffic Analysis Shows More Competitors on U.S. City Pairs
airlines.org
3.21
3.33
3.41
3.39
3.49
3.54
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2017
7
* Carrying at least 5 percent of O&D passengers in the city pair; average number of competitors is passenger-weighted across city pairs
Average Number of Competitors* on All Reported Domestic U.S. Itineraries
Source: Compass Lexecon analysis of DOT Origin-Destination Survey (Data Bank 1B)
Los Angeles-Seattle Is Among Countless Domestic City Pairs on WhichCompetition* Has Increased Since 2007 (Real Fares Down 20%, Passengers Up 78%)
airlines.org8
64%
17%
8%
7%
* Defined as carrying at least 5 percent of O&D passengers between BUR/LAX/LGB and SEASource: DOT Data Bank 1B and Innovata published schedules via Diio Mi
56%
20%
7%
6%
6%
2007 O&D Passenger Share 1Q-3Q18 O&D Passenger Share
Boston-Akron/Cleveland Is Among Countless Domestic City Pairs on Which
Competition* Has Increased Since 2007 (Real Fares Down 20%, Passengers Up 23%)
* Defined as carrying at least 5 percent of O&D passengers between BOS and CAK/CLESource: DOT Data Bank 1B and Innovata published schedules via Diio Mi
airlines.org9
63%
30%
2007 O&D Passenger Share 1Q-3Q18 O&D Passenger Share
48%
25%
15%
5%
5%
Air Travel Between the U.S. and Foreign Countries* Reached All-Time High in 2018Foreign Flag Airlines Carried 53 Percent of Passengers, Up From 45 Percent in 2011
airlines.org
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce National Travel and Tourism Office
10
*Years preceding 2011 do not include traffic between the United States and Canada
91.3 95.3 98.4 102.1 104.6 107.2 111.9 115.9 75.0 82.2 86.9 95.2 104.5 114.4 121.7 130.1 166.3 177.6 185.4 197.3 209.1 221.6 233.6 246.1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
U.S. Flag Foreign Flag
International Air Passengers* (Millions) to/from the United States
From 2010-2018, U.S. Airlines* Plowed 75% of Operating Cash Flow Back Into the Product While Retiring $79B in Debt and Returning $48B in Cash to Shareholders
airlines.org11
* SEC filings of Alaska, Allegiant, American, Delta, Hawaiian, JetBlue, Southwest, Spirit, United and merged/acquired predecessors
2010-2018 Total Per Psgr. % Ops CF
Retire Debt $78.8B ~$12 49%
Enhance the Product $120.9B ~$18 75%
Reward Shareholders $47.5B ~$7 29%
Substantial U.S. Passenger Airline Capital Investment* Continued in 2018 Despite Waning Profits – Bringing Total for This Business Cycle to $121 Billion
airlines.org12
5.26.6
9.8
12.513.9
17.0 17.519.9
18.6
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Source: SEC filings of Alaska, Allegiant, American, Delta, Hawaiian, JetBlue, Southwest, Spirit, United and merged/acquired predecessors
U.S. Passenger Airline Capital Expenditures*$ Billions per Year
* Includes payments made for aircraft and other flight equipment, ground and other property and equipment, airport and other facility construction and information technology
» As of YE18, firm orders for 1,717 aircraft valued at $88B
§ Expecting deliveries to average ~ one new aircraft per day in 2019
» Additionally, several billion dollars in commitments for ground equipment, facilities and information technology
Airline-Airport Collaboration Has Paved Way for Widespread Infrastructure InvestmentCapital Investment Has More Than Doubled Since 2015 at the 30 Largest U.S. Airports*
airlines.org13
» Nearly $165B of capital projects completed, underway or approved at the 30 largest U.S. airports since 2008, including, for example:o New/expanded/modernized facilities at Atlanta, Boston, Chicago (ORD),
Dallas (DFW), Denver, Honolulu, Houston (IAH), Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, Newark, New York (JFK and LGA), Orlando, Phoenix, Portland, Salt Lake City, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle and Washington (DCA)
o 27 airfield capacity projects at 23 major airports, including new runways at Chicago (ORD), Charlotte, Seattle and Washington (IAD)
» Development is also robust at smaller airports, including:o Airfield projects at Anchorage, Columbus, Des Moines, El Paso,
Manchester, Providence and Sioux Falls
o Terminal projects at Bangor, Dallas (DAL), Eugene, Grand Rapids, Greenville-Spartanburg, Kansas City, Nashville, New Orleans, Oakland, Pasco, Reno, San Antonio, San Luis Obispo and Wichita
» Investment is also occurring in cargo facilities and related infrastructure – e.g., Fort Worth, Louisville, Lafayette, Indianapolis, Memphis, Miami, Newark, Ontario, Rockford
$70
$100
$130
$165
2015 2017 2018 2019Approved Completed/Underway
Investment at Largest Airports*($ Billions)
* Capital projects completed, underway or approved at the 30 largest U.S. airports since 2008, per A4A research
.
ATL
CLT
DCA
DFW
EWR
IAH
JFKLGA
MDW
MIA
ORD
PHL
SEA
MCOTPA
MSP
$1-5B $6-9B $10B+$100M-$1B
PDX
HNL
DEN
LAS
PHX
SLC
SAN
LAX
BWI
Airport Investment Is Booming at Airports Across the United States*
* A4A research (capital projects completed, underway or approved since 2008 at 30 large hub airports) and FAA Form 127 reports (capital expenditures and construction in progress, 2009-2018)
ANCKOA
GSPMYR
RNO IND
ICT
AUS
MEM
LGB
SJC
MSY
MCI
BHMDAL
HOU
RDUBNA
14airlines.org
SMF STL
BZN
SGF
DSM
TULOKC
BOI
GPT
IDA
CID
MLB
LBB
ELPTUS
CRW
JAC
MOT
JAX
COS
HSV
AVL
GRR
FAI
JNU
SNA
MRYFAT
BURXNA
LIT
ECP
BDL
BFIGEG
AEX
ACY
PNS
PBI
RSW
SAV
MLI
SFB
OGG
ITO
PIA
LEX
BTR
RFD
AZA
PWM
LFT
BUF
LNK
GSO
DLH
OMA
ROC SYRMHT
ABQ
BOS
PVD
ABE
CLE
HPN
CAK
FSD
PIT
CHS
DAYCVG
CMH
PHF
SAT
TYS
IAD
SWF
FLL
DTW
SDF
ORF
RIC
BLI
BTV
MKE
PSC
PBG
SBA
SFO
OAK
CRP
SGU
BET
According to FAA, Flight Delays Cost the USA an Estimated $28B in 2018More Than Half of Delay Costs Attributed to Passenger Value of Time
Source: FAA Air Traffic Organization update to “Total Delay Impact Study: A Comprehensive Assessment of the Costs and Impacts of Flight Delay in the United States”
$6.4
$16.1 $2.1$3.6 $28.2
Airlines (1)
Passengers (2)
Lost Demand (3)
Indirect (4)
TOTAL
2018 U.S. Flight Delay Costs($Billions)
airlines.org15
1. Increased expenses for crew, fuel, maintenance, etc.2. Time lost due to schedule buffer, delayed flights, flight cancellations, missed connections3. Estimated welfare loss incurred by passengers who avoid air travel as the result of delays4. Increased cost of doing business for other sectors, making associated business less productive
Airlines Utilize a Wide Array of Tools to Improve Profitability Amid Rising Costs
airlines.org16
Increase fuel efficiency (reduce consumption per unit of flying)o Continue to replace older (often smaller) aircraft with typically larger, next-generation or re-engined aircrafto Deploy state-of-the-art flight planning/navigation software to optimize airborne movement of aircraft
o Utilize taxi-management technologies – and single-engine taxi – to minimize ground-based fuel burno Consistently employ ground power while parked at gate instead of aircraft auxiliary power unit (APU)o Reduce onboard weight (e.g., lighter materials/structures, inflight entertainment systems, excess fuel)
Airlines Utilize a Wide Array of Tools to Improve Profitability (Cont’d)
airlines.org17
Reduce or contain non-fuel costso Deploy customer-preferred technologies
(e.g., airport kiosks for self-tagging of luggage, airline apps for passenger modification of itinerary in lieu of agents)
o Drive more bookings to lower-cost direct distribution channels (e.g., website, app)
o Trim management/nonunion headcount via attrition, buy-outs; freeze open positions
o Retire debt to lower interest expense
o Use virtual medicine (e.g., Doctor on Demand) for health care – cost-efficient and highly popular with workforce
o Achieve single pilot/FA contracts – reduce delays/cancels, enable efficient use of aircraft/crews, avoids over-hiring
o Employ new software/methods to improve hotel procurement and manage employee travel bookings
o Insource engine/ground-handling/other work to be performed better/more efficiently (where practicable)
o Negotiate preferred-pricing maintenance contracts enabled by improved scale/credit, recover warranties on aircraft parts, leverage data streams from new aircraft/engines to increase reliability and lower repair/inspection costs
Airlines Utilize a Wide Array of Tools to Improve Profitability (Cont’d)
airlines.org18
Generate more revenue
o Carry more passenger traffic or better mix of traffic (corporate/premium), optimize fare/fee structure
o Boost availability/desirability of ancillary products (fleet-wide/faster WiFi, live TV int’l, refurbished clubs)
o Increase credit card sales – attracting new accounts due to larger networks and customer-preferred timings
o Intensify cargo sales efforts and leverage increased belly capacity (and temp controls) offered by new aircraft