university of wisconsin school of medicine and public health progress in cancer control: maximizing...
TRANSCRIPT
University of WisconsinSchool of Medicine and Public Health
Progress in Cancer Control: Maximizing Collaboration,
Minimizing Disparities
Patrick Remington, MD, MPHDepartment of Population Health Sciences
2008 Iowa Cancer Summit Des Moines, Iowa
Overview
1. Causes of cancer -Cancer continuum
-Attributable risk
2. Trends in cancer -Incidence, survival, mortality, risk factors
3. Three perspectives on approaches to cancer control
CausesCauses TrendsTrends PerspectivesPerspectives
Pre-test: What is the leading cause of cancer death in the US?
a. Breast cancer
b. Lung cancer
c. Colon cancer
d. Prostate cancer
e. None of the above
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Causes of Cancer Death, 2008
29%
9%
7%5%
50% LungColonBreastProstateAll other
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Source: ACS, Cancer Facts and Figures 2008
Health
Risk Factors
Cancer
Death
Cancer Continuum
Treatment
Screening
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Health
Risk Factors
Cancer
Death
Cancer Continuum
Tobacco
Diet, exercise
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Health
Risk Factors
Cancer
Death
Cancer Continuum
Cigarette advertising
Poverty
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Cancer Epidemiology
• Determinants– What are the “causes of cancer”– Is screening effective in reducing the risk
of dying from cancer?
• Distribution– What are the trends in cancer?– Which persons are at greatest risk?– What places have higher cancer rates?
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Preventable Causes of Cancer
Lung
Cancer
Colon
Cancer
Breast
Cancer
Prostate
Cancer
Other
Cancer
Tobacco use X X
Alcohol use X X
Diet X X X X
Inactivity X X X X
Obesity X X X
Microbes/toxins X
Other factors X X
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Causes of Lung Cancer
88%
10% 2%
Tobacco
Radon
ETS
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Causes of Colon Cancer
20%
30%30%
20%High fat diet
Low vegetabledietPhysicalinactivityUnknown
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Causes of Breast Cancer
12%
7%
5%2%
74%
Obesity
Late birth
No children
Radiation
Unknown
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Causes of Prostate Cancer
20%
5%
75%
Diet?
Occupationalexposures
Unknown
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Preventable Causes of Cancer
Lung
Cancer
Colon
Cancer
Breast
Cancer
Prostate
Cancer
Other
Cancer
Tobacco use X X
Alcohol use X X
Diet X X X X
Inactivity X X X X
Obesity X X X
Microbes/toxins X
Other factors X X
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
“Preventable” Causes Cancer
29%
35%
9%
3%
7%
7%
10%
Tobacco
Diet
Microbes
Toxins
STDs
Alcohol
Other
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Post-test: What are the leading causes of cancer death in the US?
Answer: Tobacco use and poor diet
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
II. What are the trends in cancer in the United States?
a. Increasing incidence & mortality
b. Increasing incidence but
decreasing mortality
c. Decreasing incidence & mortality
d. All of the above
e. None of the above
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Measuring Progress inCancer Control
• Direct measures– incidence– survival– mortality
• Risk factors
• Advances in knowledge
National Cancer Institute. JNCI 1990;82:825-35
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Trends in Cancer Incidence,U.S., 1975-2005
370
390
410
430
450
470
490
510
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
Year SEER, 2008
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Trends in Cancer Incidence,U.S., 1975-2005
370
390
410
430
450
470
490
510
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
Year SEER, 2008
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Questions• What is responsible for the increase during
the 1980s?
• What is responsible for the sharp decrease in the 1990s?
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Trends in Cancer Incidence,U.S., 1975-2005
300
400
500
600
700
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
Year SEER, 2008
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Women
Men
Trends in Cancer Incidence,U.S., 1975-2005
050
100150200250300350400450500
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
Year SEER, 2008
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Prostate
All other sites
Trends in Cancer Incidence,U.S., 1975-2005
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Percentage of 1975 rate
Year SEER, 2008
?
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
All other sites
Prostate
Trends in Cancer Incidence,U.S., 1975-2005
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Percentage of 1975 rate
Year SEER, 2008
PSA screening
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
All other sites
Prostate
Trends in Cancer Incidence,U.S., 1975-2005
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
Year SEER, 2008
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
All other sites
Breast
Trends in Cancer Incidence,U.S., 1975-2005
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Percentage of 1975 rate
Year SEER, 2008
?
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
All other sites
Breast
Trends in Cancer Incidence,U.S., 1975-2005
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Percentage of 1975 rate
Year SEER, 2008
Mammography
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
All other sites
Breast
Lead Time and Cancer Screening
Expected: 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Year: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Lead Time and Cancer Screening
Expected: 1000 1000 1000 700 700 700 700
Year: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .
Screen Detected: 0 300 300 300 300 300 300
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Lead Time and Cancer Screening
Expected: 1000 1000 1000 700 700 700 700
Screen Detected: 0 300 300 300 300 300 300
TotalReported: 1000 1300 1300 1000 1000 1000 1000
Year: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
A. Summary: Cancer Incidence• Increasing cancer incidence due mostly to
increased screening--that’s good– Diagnosing ‘future’ cases due to lead time– Diagnosing tumors that might not have ever
progressed
• Not a good summary measure of progress in cancer control
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
B. Cancer Survival• What are the trends in cancer survival?
• Data available– SEER– State cancer registries
• Based on follow-up in registries
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Trends in 5-Year Cancer Survival,U.S., Year of Dx (1973-2000)
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
Percent Surviving
Year SEER, 2008
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Lead Time and Cancer Screening
0 5 10 15
No cancer Pre-clinical ClinicalDiagnosed Died
5-years
Survival
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
0 5 10 15
No cancer Pre-clinical Clinical5-years
Diagnosed DiedSurvival
0 5 10 159-years?
Diagnosed Died
Lead Time and Cancer Screening
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
0 5 10 15
No cancer Pre-clinical Clinical5-years
0 5 10 20
Diagnosed Died
Diagnosed Died
Survival
14-years?15
0 5 10 159-years?
Diagnosed Died
Lead Time and Cancer Screening
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
B. Summary: Cancer Survival
• Cancer survival rates are improving--that’s good
• But changes in cancer cancer survival are hard to interpret– Lead time from screening-detected
cancers– Increased detection of non-invasive
cancers
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
C. Cancer Mortality • What are the trends in cancer mortality?
• Data from vital statistics– Based on death certificates– Completed by physicians/coroners/
medical examiners at the time of death
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Trends in Cancer Mortality in the U.S., 1950-2000
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
YearHealth U.S., 2006
Trends in Cancer Mortality in the U.S., 1950-2000
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
YearHealth U.S., 2006
Bailar 1986
Bailar’s Conclusion
• The best single measure is the age-adjusted mortality rate associated with all cancers
• According to this measure, we are losing the war against cancer
• A shift in research emphasis, from research on treatment to research on prevention, seems necessary if substantial progress against cancer is to be forthcoming
Trends in Cancer Mortality in the U.S., 1950-2000
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
YearHealth U.S., 2006
Bailar 1986
Trends in Cancer Mortality in the U.S., 1950-2000
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
YearHealth U.S., 2006
Bailar 1986
Bailar 1997
What are the recent trends in cancer mortality in the United
States?
a. Increasing
b. Decreasing
c. No change
d. None of the above
e. Not sure
Trends in Cancer Mortality in the U.S., 1950-2000
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
YearHealth U.S., 2006
Bailar 1986
Bailar 1997
Trends in Cancer Mortality in the U.S., 1950-2000
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
YearHealth U.S., 2006
Bailar 1986
Bailar 1997
Cancer Death Rates, for Men, US,1930-2005
0
20
40
60
80
100
1930
1935
1940
1945
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
Lung & bronchus
Colon & rectum
Stomach
Rate Per 100,000
Prostate
Pancreas
LiverLeukemia
0
20
40
60
80
100
1930
1935
1940
1945
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
Lung & bronchus
Colon & rectum
Uterus
Stomach
Breast
Ovary
Pancreas
Rate Per 100,000
Cancer Death Rates, for Women, US,1930-2005
Trends in Cancer Mortality,By Race, U.S., 1975-2005
050
100150200250300350400450
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
Year CDC, 2008
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Black Men
Black Women
White Women
White Men
Trends in Cancer Mortality,RR Black:White, U.S., 1975-2005
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
Relative Risk
Year CDC, 2008
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Men
Both
Women
Trends in Cancer Deaths,U.S., 1979-2005
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
85+75-8465-7455-6445-5435-44
Rate/100,000
Year CDC, 2008
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Trends in Cancer Deaths,U.S., 1979-2005
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
85+75-8465-7455-6445-5435-44
Percentage of 1979 rate
Year CDC, 2008
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Change in the Number of Cancer DeathsU.S., 1990 to 2000
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
-10000
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
Total Sex Age
64,100 fewer deaths
Male:51,900
Female:12,200
Under age 75:66,300
Over age 75:2,200
more deaths
Andersen et al, 2002
Change in the Number of Cancer DeathsSelected Sites, U.S., 1990 to 2000
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
-10000
-5000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
Lu
ng
(Mal
e)
Pro
stat
e
Bre
ast
Col
orec
tal
Sto
mac
h
Cer
vica
l
Mel
anom
a
NH
L
Liv
er
Lu
ng
(Fem
ale)
89 % of total fewer deaths
Andersen et al, 2002
C. Summary: Cancer Mortality
• Cancer mortality rates are decreasing among younger persons--that’s good– Better treatment of childhood cancers– Lower smoking rates among young adults
• Cancer mortality rates are increasing among women and older persons-that’s bad– Long-term tobacco exposure
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
C. Cancer Mortality, cont. • The summary measure of age-adjusted
mortality has limitations
• Need to examine trends by:– Age, gender, race– Type of cancer– Region
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
D. Summary: Risk Factors• Smoking: Prevalence declined from 42%
in 1960s to 25% in 1995
• Diet: Less red meat, more chicken, more fiber
• Exercise: No data. Rates of obesity are increasing
• Environmental exposures: ?
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Post-test: What are the trends in cancer in the United States?
d. All of the above
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Summary
• Epidemiology has uncovered many risk factors for cancer (e.g. tobacco use, poor diet, alcohol).
• The challenge is to understand the ‘upstream’ causes of these risk factors
• Then develop effective strategies to prevent cancer--especially for those groups at the highest risk
CausesCauses TrendsTrends Perspectives Perspectives
Perspective #1• The progress in cancer control is minimal
compared to other diseases
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Trends in Cancer Mortality in the U.S., 1950-2000
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
YearHealth U.S., 2006
Trends in Cancer Mortality in the U.S., 1950-2000
0
50
100
150
200
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
YearHealth U.S., 2006
Trends in Mortality in the U.S., 1980-2005
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
HeartCancerStroke
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
YearCDC WONDER, 2008
Change in the US Death Rates* by Cause, 1950 & 2004
* Age-adjusted to 2000 US standard population.Sources: 1950 Mortality Data - CDC/NCHS, NVSS, Mortality Revised.2004 Mortality Data: US Mortality Public Use Data Tape, 2004, NCHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006
19.8
180.7
48.1
586.8
193.9
50.0
185.8217.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
HeartDiseases
CerebrovascularDiseases
Pneumonia/Influenza
Cancer
1950
2004
Rate Per 100,000
050
100150
200250
300350
400450
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
Cancer
Heart disease
Trends in Age-Adjusted Death Rates, 1980-2005 and Projected from 2006-2010.
Chairez E, Jones N, and Remington P (submitted for publication)
MN OR
CO HI
AK
MT
CT
NH VT
SD
KS
NMNE ND
WA
MA
MO
TN
UTOH
WVPAIN
NC
SC
ID
ME
VA
WI NY
LA
MDTX
AR
DE
GA
MI
CA
NJ ALRIWYNV
2000 2010 2020
Number of States
The year cancer becomes the leading cause of death in the 50 states.
IA
FL
IL
AZ
KY
OK MS
1
2
3
4
5
6
2005 2015
Perspective #2• Cancer trends are not the same in all
groups in the population
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Trends in Breast Cancer Mortality by Race, U.S., 1980-2005
15
20
25
30
35
40
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
White
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
YearCDC WONDER, 2008
Trends in Breast Cancer Mortality by Race, U.S., 1980-2005
15
20
25
30
35
40
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
WhiteBlack
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
YearCDC WONDER, 2008
10
15
20
25
30
35
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
White
Year CDC Wonder, 2008
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Deaths,U.S., 1980-2005
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
10
15
20
25
30
35
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
BlackWhite
Year CDC Wonder, 2008
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Deaths,U.S., 1980-2005
Age-adjusted rate/100,000
Cancer Risk Factors and SES• Smoking: Higher smoking rates among
the poor and less educated
• Diet and obesity: Higher fat diets, lower consumption of fruits and vegetables among the poor
• Cancer screening: Later access to and use of breast and cervical cancer screening services
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives
Trends in Smoking by EducationU.S., 1966-2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
1966 1974 1985 1995 2006
< HSHigh schoolSome collegeCollege degree
Percent
Year
Health U.S., 1998 (1966 from SGR 1989), MMWR 56(44), 2006
Trends in Smoking by EducationU.S., 1966-2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
1966 1974 1985 1995 2006
< HSHigh schoolSome collegeCollege degree
Percent
Year
Health U.S., 1998 (1966 from SGR 1989), MMWR 56(44), 2006
Trends in Smoking by EducationU.S., 1966-2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
1966 1974 1985 1995 2006
< HSHigh schoolSome collegeCollege degree
Percent
Year
Health U.S., 1998 (1966 from SGR 1989), MMWR 56(44), 2006
Trends in Smoking by EducationU.S., 1966-2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
1966 1974 1985 1995 2006
< HSHigh schoolSome collegeCollege degree
Percent
Year
Health U.S., 1998 (1966 from SGR 1989), MMWR 56(44), 2006
Trends in Smoking by EducationU.S., 1966-2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
1966 1974 1985 1995 2006
< HSHigh schoolSome collegeCollege degree
Percent
Year
Health U.S., 1998 (1966 from SGR 1989), MMWR 56(44), 2006
Trends in Percent of Adults who Smoke, 1965-2020
05
101520253035404550
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Percentsmokers
Year
U.S.
Trends in Percent of Adults who Smoke, 1965-2020
05
101520253035404550
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Percentsmokers
Year
U.S.
Iowa
Trends in Percent of Adults who Smoke, 1965-2020
05
101520253035404550
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Percentsmokers
Year
2010Goal (12%)
Iowa
Trends in Percent of Adults who Smoke, 1965-2020
05
101520253035404550
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Percentsmokers
Year
2010Goal (12%) 2020?
(8%)Iowa
Trends in Percent of Adults who Smoke, 1965-2020
05
101520253035404550
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Percentsmokers
Year
38%
26% 23%
11%Iowa
05
101520253035404550
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Percentsmokers
Year
<HS
HS SomeCollege
CollegeGradIowa
Iowa Smoking Rates by Education
40 Developmental Assets
INTERNAL
• Homework
• Integrity
• Resistance skills
• Self-esteem
EXTERNAL
• Family support
• Service to others
• High expectations
• Youth programs
Percent cigarette smokers, Jefferson County, 1997
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40
Number of Developmental ‘Assets’
Percent
Perspective #3• We need to monitor trends “upstream”
from cancer and cancer risk factors
• For example, what are the “causes” of tobacco use among children?
CausesCauses Trends Trends Perspectives Perspectives