university of rio grande rio grande, ohio handbook university of rio grande rio grande, ohio revised...

26
Portfolio handbook University of Rio Grande RIO Grande, Ohio Revised Spring 2013

Upload: doantuyen

Post on 06-Jul-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Portfolio handbook

University of Rio Grande

RIO Grande, Ohio

Revised Spring 2013

2

Table of Contents

Introduction 3

Portfolio Questions & Answers 4

Development of Working Portfolio 6

Conceptual Framework 8

Portfolio Categories and Components 14

Student Learning/Diversity 14

Content Area/Subject Matter 15

Assessment 15

Instructional Strategies/Planning for Instruction 15

Learning Environment & Student Support 16

Communication/Collaboration 17

Professional Development 18

Official Documents 18

Portfolio Assessment Rubric 19

URG Lesson Plan Format 26

3

Professional Portfolio

University of Rio Grande

School of Education

Initial Licensure Programs

All Teacher Candidates at the University of Rio Grande who enter the Teacher Education Program

are required to maintain a working portfolio as evidence of progress toward licensure in a selected teacher

education field of Early Childhood, Middle Childhood, Adolescent to Young Adult, Multi-Age or

Intervention Specialist. The portfolio is introduced to you in your first Professional Education Course: EDU

10303. You will continue to gather artifacts until you enter clinical practice. Artifacts are work samples and

other materials that you collect for your working portfolio. Your working portfolio will be assessed at three

Benchmarks. When you enroll in Clinical Practice, you will also enroll in EDU 48902 Portfolio. During this

class you will have your final assessment and will turn your working portfolio into a professional portfolio

to take with you for job interviews and employment requirements.

The working portfolio serves the following purposes:

A. Assist teacher candidates in focusing on the professional nature and requirements

of their chosen field of teaching.

B. Shows professional growth of the teacher candidate during work of his/her license

program.

C. Provides the teacher education faculty and teacher candidate with a common focus

on the teacher education program's conceptual framework.

D. Provides a framework for a candidate’s Four-Year Residency Portfolio

E. Affords faculty with an authentic assessment of teacher candidates' progress.

The University Of Rio Grande School Of Education Working Portfolio Handbook was

developed by the faculty of the School of Education. Information is given in the following pages to

assist you in selecting artifacts for your working portfolio. Your portfolio is a collection of materials that

you use as evidence that you have acquired the identified knowledge, skill, or disposition. The portfolio

is not to be used as a place to store all materials accumulated during your licensure program. Each

artifact should be carefully selected and a reflection attached that explains your reasons for selecting the

artifact, how it has contributed to your professional growth, and how this artifact will help you in your

teaching career.

4

Portfolio Questions and Answers

1. What is a portfolio?

A portfolio is a collection of materials to demonstrate what a person has done or is capable of doing as a

teacher candidate. Specialized Professional Associations (SPAS) and license agencies have identified

knowledge, skills, and dispositions that teacher candidates must possess to be successful as a beginning

teacher. Your portfolio is a collection of documents (statements, letters, pictures, records and research)

that demonstrates to others that you have this knowledge, skill, or disposition. The material you collect

may also be a record of your performance when you complete a teaching task in the field, which may

include evaluations by your master teacher or other professionals. This material should be collected and

stores in an e-folio (flashdrive). It is a good idea to think of your working portfolio as proof that you have

mastered identified knowledge, skills, and dispositions. It is also a good idea to view your portfolio as a

showcase of your work and your talents.

2. Why is a portfolio a requirement in my Teacher Education Program at the

University of Rio Grande?

The United States Congress, as well as state governing bodies, is requiring an increase in accountability of

teachers for their work with students. There is also an expectation that practicing teachers will participate in a

variety of professional development activities over the course of their career. The Working Portfolio you will

create during your Teacher Education Program at the University of Rio Grande is intended to identify

knowledge, skills, and dispositions that you have mastered at our institution. The portfolio also provides you

with a valuable opportunity to set your own goals, evaluate how you are doing in your efforts to reach these

goals, and notice how your personal professional goals match the goals of the teacher education program at

our institution. The working portfolio material also helps you to develop a professional portfolio during

clinical practice that you will take with you during interviews for employment in the teaching profession and as

a foundation for your Four-Year Residency Portfolio. Additionally, the portfolio offers you a systematic way to

keep documents that may be easy to misplace, but are necessary to have at your disposal for licensure and

employment. Such documents include your college transcripts, PRAXIS test scores, TB Tests and background

(BCI) checks. A greater purpose for your portfolio is to get you started on habits of mind that will continue after

you leave our institution, such as setting and reaching professional goals which are required for renewal of your

teaching license.

3. Who is responsible for collection of artifacts in my working portfolio?

The student is responsible for collection of artifacts in the working portfolio. Your advisor will assist you with

your portfolio upon your request as well as the EDU 48901Portfolio professor.

4. How will my working portfolio be assessed?

Your portfolio will be assessed by a committee of School of Education Faculty and

outside professionals using an identified rubric for assessment. Teacher candidates must

5

sign a Portfolio Contract before the portfolio is submitted for each Benchmark Evaluation.

The Portfolio Contract should be placed in Category Eight (8), Official Documents.

5. When is my portfolio assessed?

In Benchmark I your portfolio is assessed by the course instructor of EDU 20403. In Benchmark II your

portfolio is assessed in EDU 30302 by a committee of School of Education Faculty and Professional Teachers

/ Educators who will use a rubric for assessment. During the Benchmark II assessment, the teacher candidate

will be required to attend and present their portfolio for review. In Benchmark III your portfolio will be

assessed by the course instructor of EDU 48901, Portfolio . If the faculty has questions concerning your

portfolio, you may be asked to appear before the committee.

6. What do I do with my portfolio after the final assessment?

During EDU 48901 Portfolio, you will review your working portfolio and retrieve artifacts that can be used to

construct a professional portfolio to take for job interviews. This is your opportunity to showcase the

knowledge, skills, and dispositions acquired throughout the program of study. Your portfolio can then be used

as you enter the teaching profession as a foundation for your Four Year Residency Portfolio.

6

DEVELOPMENT OF A WORKING PORTFOLIO

During your Benchmark I class you will begin to accumulate evidence of knowledge, skills, and dispositions

for your portfolio. Your folders will contain the following categories:

1. Student Learning/Diversity 2. Content Area/Subject Matter 3. Assessment 4. Instructional Strategies/Planning Instruction

5. Learning Environment & Student Support 6. Communication/Collaboration 7. Professional Development 8. Official Documents

The categories of your portfolio are based upon the University of Rio Grande School of Education

Conceptual Framework which is included in this handbook. Begin your selection process by collecting

samples of your work, official documents, or visual reminders to yourself and the faculty assessors of your

learning experience during your courses at the University of Rio Grande. A minimum of three (3) for

Benchmark I, and a minimum of ten (10) items are-required for each category in your portfolio in the first

eleven (11) categories for Benchmark II.

A major part of each piece that you add to your portfolio is a REFLECTION that identifies reasons that you

selected this piece. A reflection is required for each piece added to your portfolio in the first eseven (7)

categories. You may link the selection to your specialized professional association (SPA) to show your

growth or how this artifact helps you meet a goal you have identified. The

reflective statement means that you have thought about the artifact or experience you selected for your portfolio

and you know what it means to you, how it has contributed to your professional growth and how you will use

this artifact in your teaching career.

To show growth, you may reflect on how well the lesson or activity met your goals.. For example, you may

include a photo or collection of photos from a unit you taught. You would include the unit and then the

reflective piece that would relate your evaluation of the lesson or unit. You might answer questions such as: Did

the students master your goals/objectives? How do you know this mastery occurred? Why did you choose this

approach? Do you need to re-teach/review to insure all students have mastered the objectives? Do you need to

revise any parts of the lesson? How does this lesson lead to your next instructional step? If you were to do this

lesson again, what would you change or keep the same.

You may also include in your portfolio papers/reports written as course assignments. For example,

your Philosophy of Education and Conceptual Framework papers as well as other coursework may be

added because you know the artifact information contained in these papers is often asked during job

interviews. Also, you may want to reflect that the materials in these papers are on-going materials that

will constantly change. As we grow professionally our views of education change. Candidates

understanding of the University of Rio Grande Conceptual Framework and how it applies to their

professional practice changes through the duration of their coursework as a Teacher Candidate. During

your field experiences individuals in the school setting may write letters commending you for your

7

participation and contributions. These also should be added to your portfolio with a reflection that comments

on your professional growth. Faculty expect your portfolio to change and improve throughout your

educational experience at the university. After each benchmark evaluation you have opportunities to

improve your portfolio, with the expectation that at the conclusion of your program it will be at a

proficient level and be a valuable working document for the candidate to use in interviews and

residency requirements.

8

Conceptual Framework

The Bunce School of Education at the University of Rio Grande (URG) recognizes the

core values of our Appalachian culture, especially ties to community and place and connection to

family. The Bunce School of Education faculty exhibits these in both our personal and our

professional relationships. We are proud of our candidates, our work, and the beautiful setting in

which we live and work. We recognize the importance of a professional education in our area

and the opportunities opened for those candidates who complete this endeavor. URG is a

teaching and service institution whose primary focus is to provide educational opportunities and

open “The Windows to the Future” for students of Appalachia in Southeast Ohio. This purpose

is in alignment with the mission of the institution, historically and today.

The Bunce School of Education faculty provide the parameter for their conceptual

framework through the theme of “Windows to the Future” which is accomplished through the

Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession. Three main organizers dominate the framework:

the Focus of Teaching and Learning, the Conditions for Teaching, and Teaching as a Profession.

Within each area are specific elements that each candidate should understand and practice as

he/she progresses through the program at URG.

The Focus of Teaching and Learning

The Focus of Teaching and Learning consists of the following components: students ,

content, assessment, and instruction. A candidate is not only at the university to learn the

content of what he/she is teaching, but to learn about diverse learners and how to provide for

their instruction. Assessment is an important part of this process today because of state tests and

accountability. Assessment results provide the teacher candidate with the knowledge and skills

of how and what to teach in a classroom.

9

Students.

In addition to understanding child development,

communication and learning, URG teacher candidates must

recognize, accept and accommodate the cultural, physical and

learning differences of individuals. These differences are dynamic,

changing each individual as he/she develops through the constant

evolution of our local community, society, and our world. We

recognize that our section of Appalachia must exist in the greater

world at large. Further, the “Windows to the Future” for our

teacher candidates provides a viewpoint into the greater world. For

many, that greater world offers a future of meaningful employment

and professional growth. The teacher candidate must be prepared to

be a successful professional, regardless of setting or population,

who is committed to the belief that all students can learn.

Content.

Teacher candidates need a broad theoretical knowledge

base and an awareness of their place in the global community. It is

critical teacher candidates have an understanding of what they are

teaching and why. They must be cognizant of the difference

between teacher objectives and student objectives in meeting the

needs of the rural P-12 student.

Standard 2:

Content

Teacher candidates

must know and

understand the

content area for which

they have

instructional

responsibility.

Standard 1:

Students

Teacher candidates

must understand

student learning and

development and

respect diversity of

students they teach.

10

Assessment.

Continuous assessment of teacher candidates’ progress to

direct and to lead P-12 student instruction is critical to the

development of the pathway from licensure candidate to practicing

professional. Licensure candidates must not only chart the progress

of their students through assessment, but chart the progress of their

own professional accomplishments and growth. This is

accomplished through core program assessments, self-reflection,

and projects.

Instruction.

Teacher candidates will plan and deliver effective

instruction that advances the learning of each student. A thorough

knowledge of subject matter and curriculum goals is necessary in

order to integrate learning across the curriculum while providing

real-world applications of the concepts being taught. Implementing

effective instruction demands an understanding of student

development and the diverse backgrounds and needs of students.

Within Appalachia, this includes planning instruction to meet the

needs of students who come from some families who have not been

successful in the K-12 educational setting and who are limited in

financial and technological resources (Arnett, 2001; Feldman, 2003;

Bredekamp & Copley, 1997; Bryant, 2007).

Standard 4:

Instruction

Teacher candidates

will plan and deliver

effective instruction

that advances the

learning of each

student.

Standard 3:

Assessment

Teacher candidates

will use varied

assessment to inform

instruction, evaluate,

and ensure student

learning.

11

The Conditions for Teaching and Learning

Learning can take place in many environments, but some are more conducive for

optimal performance. A teacher candidate must devote time and energy to setting up the

environment to address all learners.

Learning environment.

The candidate must gain knowledge of ways to set up a

classroom to facilitate learning. The candidate discovers that rules,

procedures, and established routines are necessary in gaining

students’ attention. Creating a physical and emotional environment

ensures the emotional, cognitive, and social well-being of students.

The teacher candidate observes master teachers in their

environment to observe effective instruction.

Teaching as a Profession

Teaching as a Profession includes communication, collaboration, and professional

development.

Communication and collaboration.

The teacher candidate learns to identify those values and

characteristics that make him/her effective in teaching others. The

candidate gains a sense of self-efficacy in teaching and continues to

keep updated in the field to help future students succeed as well. :

A core thread of Appalachian and rural culture is communication.

According to Payne (1998) effective communication with the

family and local populace by the local schools is vital to breaking

Standard 5: Learning

Environment

Teacher candidates

will create learning

environments that

promote high levels of

learning and

achievement for all

students.

Standard 6:

Communication &

Collaboration

Teacher candidates

will collaborate and

communicate with

students, parents,

other educators,

administrators and

the community to

support student

learning.

12

the cycle of poverty.

Professional development. Self-assessment of instructional and leadership objectives

are critical for planning continuing education and improvement of

instruction. Teacher candidates participate in higher education

faculty-guided self-assessments to lay the groundwork for later

professional development. Because of the dynamic nature of our

society, teachers must firmly believe and actively engage in

practice of life-long learning. As role models for their students,

educators must be enthusiastic for the subject matter, remain

current with changes in technology, be mindful of human needs,

and maintain a sense of humor in order to instill lifelong learning

as a core value and practice (Bryant, 2007; Jones, 1994; Murphy &

Underwood, 2001).

The needs and nature of our surrounding areas dictate the knowledge bases upon which

we have based our program and developed the Bunce School of Education Conceptual

Framework to prepare our teacher candidates. By pursuing an education degree and gaining

professional employment in the area, candidates are able to work in a profession that provides,

“nearness to family, a beautiful environment, and time to pursue personal interests” (Knight

Knight, & Quickenton, p. 84). The Bunce School of Education Conceptual Framework opens

“Windows to the Future” by providing a path for teacher candidates, who in turn open “Windows

to the Future” for their students.

Standard 7: Professional

Responsibility & Growth

Teacher candidates

will assume

responsibility for

professional growth,

performance and

involvement as

individuals and as

members of a learning

community.

13

References

Arnett, J. J. (2001). Adolescence and emerging adulthood. NJ/OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C., Eds. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early

childhood programs (Revised edition). Washington, D.C.: National Association for the

Education of Young Children.

Bryant, J. (2007). Killing Mayberry: The crisis in rural American evaluation. The Rural

Educator (29:1).

Feldman, W. (2003). Development across the lifespan (3rd

ed.). NJ/OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Jones, L. (1994). Appalachian Values. Ashland, KY: Jesse Stuart Foundation.

Knight, J. P., Knight, C. S., & Quickenton, A. (1997). Education in rural schools. The Education

Forum (61). DOI:10.1080/00131729609335229

Murphy, S., & Underwood, T. (2001). Portfolio practices: Lessons from schools, districts and

states. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.

Payne, R. (1998). A framework for understanding poverty. Highlands, TX: RFT Publishing, Inc.

14

Portfolio Categories and Components 1. Student Learning/Diversity

This category is designed to demonstrate that the teacher candidate understands how students

learn and develop, and subsequently the teacher candidate can create opportunities for each

student's academic development. This category is designed to demonstrate that the teacher

candidate has an understanding of differences in student population, how students learn. In this

category the teacher candidate must also demonstrate knowledge of how to accommodate such

diversity. Artifacts in this category may include but are not limited to: Evidence that demonstrates that you recognize and use developmentally appropriate

materials and are knowledgeable of developmentally appropriate practices. Your professional education courses provide a sound pedagogy and additional courses you may use include but are not limited to: psychology, human growth, and children's literature courses.

Samples of professional evidence from education courses and content area courses.

Projects you have launched or participated in with students may also be used. You

may include community service projects in this section such as work with campus,

Scouts, church work, etc.

Letters from field-based teachers or adult supervisors may be included in the

category if the letter reflects your knowledge of student learning.

Self Reflections on Field Experience, Novice or Targeted Level

Student Assessment Data from lessons/units taught in Novice or Targeted Level Field

Experience Courses

Professional Evidence that demonstrates your knowledge of different learning

styles and how this knowledge is reflected in your teaching.

Professional Evidence that demonstrates your knowledge of biological, psychological,

social, and cultural differences among people that may impact teaching and learning.

Research reports from professional journals or Internet articles are strongly encouraged

to be included in this category. This research should include reflections concerning the

audience with whom you could share your research such as your peers, parents, or other

members of the community. Professional Evidence that demonstrates effective interaction with diverse populations

in a P-12 setting.

Professional Evidence demonstrates an understanding of social structures.

Examples of laws and court cases that relate to equal educational

opportunities for all. Examples of units written concerning diversity that demonstrate an

understanding of adaptations that take particular differences into consideration.

Lesson plans that reflect knowledge of the learning needs of a diversity of learners and provide for those needs through lesson accommodations, modifications, and adaptations.

Letters from field-based teachers, supervisors, parents, or community members

concerning your ability to interact with all students.

Reflective Papers from Field Experience(s) in Diverse Settings

Lesson and Unit Plans with instruction addressing tolerance and Social Justice for all students.

15

2. Content Area/Subject Matter This category is designed to demonstrate that the teacher candidate has a thorough

understanding and knowledge of subject matter/content and uses such knowledge to

create effective learning experiences for students in the field. Artifacts in this area should reflect SPA specific standards. Artifacts in this category may include but are not limited

to: Professional Evidence that demonstrates subject matter knowledge. This material is

often generated in your education courses, especially courses that have a strong correlation to your teacher education license area.

Other types of authentic assessment not identified in the above paragraph may be used

in your portfolio. Remember that in the classroom you are expected to have a strong

knowledge base of the subject material you are teaching.

3. Assessment

This category is designed to demonstrate that the teacher candidatd effectively uses formal and

informal assessment strategies to evaluate student progress. Artifacts in this category may

include but are not limited to:

Professional evidence that demonstrates an understanding of test construction

and alternate forms of assessment including alternative assessment.

Demonstration of an understanding of adapting assessment(s) to meet the needs of

exceptional students and other students from diverse populations.

Examples of a variety of assessment strategies contained in lesson or unit plans from

methods courses.

Examples of a variety of assessments given to students in Novice and Targeted field experiences. These should include samples of students' work.

Lesson plans that have an assessment component aligned to lesson objectives

Letters from field based teachers who identify your strengths and

weaknesses in assessing students.

4. Instructional Strategies/Planning for Instruction This category is designed to demonstrate that the teacher candidate can plan instruction based

on knowledge of subject matter and students, and uses approved Specialized Professional

Associations [SPAs], state content standards, and approved curriculum models. It is further

designed to demonstrate that the teacher candidate can effectively use a wide variety of instructional strategies to achieve student success. Artifacts in this category may include but

are not limited to:

Examples of units or lesson plans based on Specialized Professional Associations,

Ohio Model Curriculum, Content Standards, URG School of Education Knowledge,

Skills and Dispositions.

Lesson plans and units from methods classes.

Professional Evidence that demonstrates knowledge of local, state, and national

professional curriculum associations and professional journals and their influence in

creating curriculum standards and reform efforts.

Letters from field-based teachers, supervisors, parents, or other community members

stating that you have the ability to effectively plan instruction.

Samples of professional evidence that demonstrate a strong knowledge base of effective

instructional practices that encourage critical thinking and problem-solving.

16

Lesson plans that demonstrate a variety of teaching strategies that are

developmentally appropriate to meet the needs of students.

Samples of field-based student work that demonstrate the results of your instruction.

Lesson plans, or professional evidence that demonstrate a connection to the specialized

professional association that guides your instruction in your licensure area(s).

Samples of Instructional Modifications within lesson and Unit plans to meet the needs

of Diverse Learners.

5 Learning Environment & Student Support

This category is designed to demonstrate that the teacher candidate can create a learning

environment that is a safe environment in which any or all students can succeed. The learning

environment must encourage active and engaged learning, a positive interaction among

students and teacher, and self-motivation by all students. In addition, teacher candidate

works with school colleagues, parents/family members, and community members to support

student learning and development. Artifacts in this category may include but are not limited

to:

Artifacts in this category may include but are not limited to:

Examples of professional evidence that demonstrate your understanding of

the concepts of learning environment and learning community.

Examples of professional evidence that demonstrate your ability to create effective

learning environments for all students. This may include classroom management

techniques and plans. Letters from field-based teachers, supervisors, parents, or community members stating

your ability to create an effective learning environment for a diversity of learners.

Evidence of collaboration with the local community

Evidence of working with families in meeting student needs

Evidence of resourcefulness in providing instruction '

Professional Evidence that demonstrates knowledge of the multiple agencies

with which schools work and how such work is organized.

Professional Evidence that demonstrates knowledge of the multiple sources of education

working in the community.

Evidence of community service. The School of Education professional development

courses which offer field experiences will allow teacher candidates to spend part of

their time in the field doing community service. Teacher candidates should check with

the instructor for permission if they wish to spend part of their field experience doing

community service. Sometimes the instructor will suggest community service

opportunities such as reading stories to children waiting in the Wellness Clinic at

Holzer Hospital. Remember that community service is more than spending time in the

community it also involves setting and reaching identified goals. Letters from professionals with whom you have worked during your community

service experience. Letters should state that the teacher candidate has an understanding of community educational opportunities outside of schools and their impact on student learning. -

Evidence of working with families to promote/enhance student learning

Evidence of Lesson/Unit/Assessment Modifications to meet diverse learner needs

17

6. Communication and Collaboration This category is designed to demonstrate that the teacher candidate collaborates with professional individuals, as well as families and community to promote student learning. It is further designed to demonstrate that the teacher candidate can effectively communicate in the classroom by using a variety of communication skills, including verbal and nonverbal techniques, technology, and media. The teacher candidate must be familiar with a variety of instructional technology media and the basic principles of instructional design. The student must also demonstrate competence in the knowledge, skills, and dispositions as identified by various School of Education course syllabi in using this knowledge base of technology in field experiences. The student must meet the technology requirements outlined by the University of Rio Grande and the School of Education Knowledge, Skills and Dispositions related to using technology to enhance student learning. Artifacts in this category may include but are not limited to: Artifacts in this category may include but are not limited to:

Professional Evidence that demonstrates the importance of collaboration with

professionals in the field. This research should acknowledge the correlation of

professional collaboration and student learning.

Professional Evidence that shows evidence of Collaborative work in the classroom

and in the field.

Documentation of work in a collaborative setting, such as Partnership Schools.

Teacher candidates may also document work in inclusive classroom, team

teaching setting and planning sessions.

Documentation of work in a collaborative setting external to the school setting.

Collaboration may involve work in the community or church settings.

Documentation of use of community resources to enhance instruction and student

learning

Documentation of work with families to enhance instruction and student learning

Documentation of the IEP Team Process for meeting the needs of students with

Exceptional Learner Needs

Demonstrated written communication.

Evaluations by your field-based teachers which include an assessment of your

verbal and nonverbal communication skills.

Video demonstration lessons.

Evidence of participation in school or public oral communication events (e.g. public

address, panel discussions, presentations, testimony, speeches, etc.).

Lesson Plans with Technology supporting student learning

Technology Presentations in CD Format

Reflection on Action Research Project Presentations focusing on the

technology used in their presentation

Professional Evidence from course work or field work that demonstrate

technology knowledge, skills, and dispositions in the URG School of

Education.

Lesson plans that demonstrate your use of technology in field work that integrates

technology in various content areas.

18

7. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

This category is designed to demonstrate that the teacher candidate analyzes past experience

and pursues professional development opportunities to improve future performance. Throughout the coursework and experiences at the University of Rio Grande, Candidates are expected to continue to engage in Professional Development.

This category highlights those endeavors. Artifacts in this category may include but are

not limited to:

Examples of professional development activities outside of the teacher education

program in which the teacher candidate has participated (e.g. professional conferences,

workshops, student membership in professional organizations).

Examples of activities in professional organizations such as offices held or project

participation.

Professional Evidence that demonstrates an understanding of the lifelong commitment

to professional development.

Verification of attendance at School of Education General Meetings

Verification of attendance at Action Research Project Presentations

Verification of membership/attendance in FEO or CEC Student Groups

Resume' and cover letter for a professional application.

Action research paper from professional education courses.

Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) of Master teacher or other

professional.

Tentative Professional Development Plan for teacher candidate.

Internet listing of Professional Development Opportunities in the area.

Local listing of Professional Development Opportunities in the area.

Statement of Long Term Professional Goals and Aspirations

8. Official Documentation

This category is designed to demonstrate that the teacher candidate keeps such official

documents as transcripts, PRAXIS tests, moral character affidavits, and official advising sheets.

Listed below is a list of examples of official documentation you may have by the end of your

program.

Signed Portfolio Contract for each Benchmark course. There are three (3) identified

Benchmark courses during which students will submit Working Portfolios to be

assessed. The Benchmark courses are EDU 20403 Planning for Instruction, EDU 30302

Multicultural Relations and EDU 49801 Portfolio.

Transcript showing grade point average (GPA).

ACT Test Scores

Letter of acceptance into the School of Education.

Official documentation of hours spent in the field for each course requiring field-

experience.

Documentation of assessment by field experience teacher for courses requiring

field-experience.

Evidence of successful completion of the Praxis I exam.

Evidence of successful completion of required Praxis II exams.

Signed Good Moral Character Affidavit

Official advising sheet.

Documentation of Application to Jr. Field Experience (EDU 39103)

Documentation of application to Clinical Practice which includes an audit

Civilian Background Check by Bureau of Criminal Identification(BCI).

19

Bunce School of Education

University of Rio Grande

Benchmark I, II, and III

Efolio Rubric Evaluation

PART A

Rating Definitions

Unsatisfactory (U, 0 pts.) - Does not exhibit evidence to demonstrate adequate knowledge or skill. Satisfactory (S, 1 pt.) – Exhibits evidence that demonstrates knowledge or skill the majority of time. Proficient (P, 2 pts.) – Exhibits quality forms of evidence that consistently demonstrates knowledge or skill.

Standard 1: Students

Teachers understand student learning and development and respect the diversity of the students they teach.

1.1: Candidate demonstrates knowledge of how students

learn and of the developmental characteristics of different

age groups of students.

Benchmark

I

Date/Rating

Benchmark

II

Date/Rating

Benchmark

III

Date/Rating

1.2: Candidate demonstrates knowledge of what students

know and are able to do and use this knowledge to meet the

needs of all students.

1.3: Candidate demonstrates an expectation that all students

will achieve to their full potential.

1.4: Candidate demonstrates respect for students’ diverse

cultures, language skills, and experiences.

1.5: Candidate assists in the appropriate identification,

instruction, and intervention for gifted students, students

with disabilities, and students identified as “at-risk”.

Additional comments (Standard 1):

20

Additional Comments (Standard 2):

Additional Comments (Standard 3):

Standard 2: Content

Teachers know and understand the content area for which they have instructional responsibility. There is a Part B to Content to be evaluated by content area professional.

2.1: Candidate uses knowledge of content-specific

concepts, assumptions, and skills to plan effective

instruction

Benchmark

I

Date/Rating

Benchmark

II

Date/Rating

Benchmark

III

Date/Rating

2.2: Candidate uses knowledge of content-specific

instructional strategies to effectively teach the central

concepts and skills of their discipline.

2.3: Candidate knows and uses school and district

curriculum priorities and the Ohio Academic Content

Standards.

2.4: Candidate connects disciplines with other content

areas to plan and deliver effective instruction.

2.5: Candidate connects content to relevant life

experiences and career opportunities.

Standard 3: Assessment Teachers understand and use varied assessments to inform instruction, evaluate and ensure student learning.

3.1: Candidate understands varied types of assessments, their

purposes, and the data they generate.

Benchmark

I

Date/Rating

Benchmark

II

Date/Rating

Benchmark

III

Date/Rating

3.2: The candidate selects, develops, and uses a variety of

diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments.

3.3: Candidate analyzes data to monitor students’ progress

and learning, and to plan, differentiate, and modify instruction

3.4: Candidate collaborates and communicates student

progress with students, parents, and colleagues.

3.5: Candidate involves learners in self-assessment and goal

setting to address gaps between performance and potential.

21

Additional comments (Standard 4):

Standard 4: Instruction

Teachers plan and deliver instruction that advances the learning of each individual student.

4.1 Candidate aligns instructional goals and activities with

school and district priorities and with Ohio’s academic content

standards.

Benchmark

I

Date/Rating

Benchmark

II

Date/Rating

Benchmark

III

Date/Rating

4.2: Candidate uses information about students’ learning and

performance to plan and deliver instruction designed to close

the achievement gap.

4.3: Candidate communicates clear learning goals and links

learning activities to those goals.

4.4: Candidate applies knowledge of how students think and

learn to instructional design and delivery.

4.5: Candidate differentiates instruction to meet the needs of

all students including gifted students, students with

disabilities, and “at risk” students.

4.6: Candidate creates and selects activities that are designed

to help students develop as individual learners and complex

problem-solvers.

4.7: Candidate uses resources effectively, including

technology, to enhance student learning.

Standard 5: Learning Environment

Teachers create learning environments that promote high levels of learning and achievement for all students.

5.1: Candidate treats all students fairly and has established a

classroom environment that is respectful, supportive, and

caring.

Benchmark

I

Date/Rating

Benchmark

II

Date/Rating

Benchmark

III

Date/Rating

5.2: Candidate creates a classroom environment that is

physically and emotionally safe.

5.3: Candidate motivates students to work productively and

22

Additional Comments (Standard 5):

Additional Comments (Standard 6):

Standard 7: Professional Responsibility and Growth

Teachers assume responsibility for professional growth, performance, and involvement as an individual and as a member of a learning community.

7.1: Candidate understands, upholds, and follows professional

ethics, policies, and legal codes of professional conduct.

Benchmark

I

Date/Rating

Benchmark

II

Date/Rating

Benchmark

III

Date/Rating

7.2: Candidate takes responsibility for engaging in continuous,

purposeful professional development.

assume responsibility for their own learning.

5.4: Candidate creates learning situations in which students

work independently, collaboratively, and/or as a whole class.

5.5: Candidate maintains an environment that is conducive to

learning for all students.

Standard 6: Collaboration and Communication

Teachers collaborate and communicate with students, parents, other educators, administrators and the community to support student learning.

6.1: Candidate communicates clearly and effectively.

Benchmark

I

Date/Rating

Benchmark

II

Date/Rating

Benchmark

III

Date/Rating

6.2: Candidate shares responsibility with parents and

caregivers to support student learning, emotional and physical

development, and mental health.

6.3: Candidate collaborates effectively with other teachers,

administrators, and school and district staff.

6.4: Candidate collaborates effectively with the local

community and community agencies, when and where

appropriate, to promote a positive environment for student

learning.

23

7.3: Candidate seeks opportunities to impact the quality of

teaching, making school improvements, and increasing student

achievement.

Additional Comments (Standard 7)

Standard 8: Official Documents

Teachers assume responsibility for maintaining official documents in a safe and secure location.

Benchmark

I

Date/Rating

Benchmark

II

Date/Rating

Benchmark

III

Date/Rating

24

Evaluator

and Date

Noted areas of

strength

Noted areas of

professional growth

Noted areas of

weaknesses

Suggestions for

Improvement

BENCHMARK I

Signature:_______________

_____________________

Date:__________________

BENCHMARK II

Signature:_______________

_____________________

Date:__________________

BENCHMARK III

Signature:_______________

_____________________

Date:__________________

25

12. Official

Documents

All

documentation

available.

Not complete

but identifies

missing

documents.

Incomplete set of

documents.

Date Date Date

A.

26

Required Lesson Plan Format

University of Rio Grande School of Education Date: Class Time: Grade/Age: Master Teacher: Lesson Objective(s) or Goal(s): These must be drawn from the State Academic Content Standards or Ohio Model Curriculum. What are your students going to learn from this lesson? University of Rio Grande School of Education Goal(s) Addressed:

Technology Component: (If applicable) How will technology be incorporated into the lesson? How will you use technology to enhance student learning?

Diversity Component: (If applicable) How will diversity be incorporated into the

lesson? Parent Involvement: (If applicable) How will parents be involved withlthis

lesson? Vocabulary: (If applicable) What specific new vocabulary will be

incorporated into the lesson?

Student Grouping: How will you group students for this lesson and why have you chosen this class configuration?

Methods/Activities: What teaching methods will be used during this lesson and why did you choose them? How do you activate prior knowledge? How will the students get to apply what you have taught? How will you foster/incorporate Higher Order Thinking Skills? How will you incorporate essential questions into your lesson? What modifications are necessary for meeting the needs of diverse students in the classroom?

Assignment(s): (If applicable) What outside assignment(s) will be required to be completed by the students?

Lesson Evaluation: Each objective/goal should have an evaluation component. Goal/Objective # I should be tied to Lesson Evaluation # 1. When will the evaluation occur and through what specific means will you conduct the evaluation? Explain the formal and or informal assessment you would use to determine the success of this lesson.

Reflection: How do you think the lesson went? Did the students master your goals/objectives? How do you know this mastery occurred? Why did you choose this approach? Do you need to reteach/review to insure all students have mastered the objectives? Do you need to revise any parts of the lesson? How does this lesson lead to your next instructional step? How did the students react to the lesson? Was the lesson too difficult or too easy? If you were to do this lesson again, what would you change or keep the same?

Bibliography: Include all sources of information, instructional and student support materials, etc you used or will use for this lesson. This includes internet and bard copy

sources.