united states air force · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey...

106
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE I-n o DTFD UUL!~UUUU ELECTEf DEC 0 21988 COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS OPERATIONS COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING AFSC 491X1/X2 AFPT 90-491-811 OCTOBER 1988 OCCUPATIONAL ANALYSIS PROGRAM RADOP AFS TEAS78104 8CTOBER21988 SAPPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED _j -

Upload: others

Post on 02-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

I-n

o DTFDUUL!~UUUU ELECTEf

DEC 0 21988

COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS OPERATIONS

COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING

AFSC 491X1/X2

AFPT 90-491-811

OCTOBER 1988

OCCUPATIONAL ANALYSIS PROGRAM

RADOP AFS TEAS78104

8CTOBER21988

SAPPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED _j -

Page 2: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

DISTRIBUTION FORAFSC 491Xl/X2 OSR AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

ANL TNG JOBOSR EXT EXT INV

AFHRL/MODS 2 Im Im I

AFHRL/ID 1 im lm/lh I

AFMPC/DPMRPO1 2

ARMY OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY BRANCH I

CCAF/AYXDEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER 2

HQ AAC/DPAT 3 3

HQ AFCC/DPATO 3 3

HQ AFCC/TTGT 3 3

HQ AFISC/DAP 2

HQ AFLC/MPCA 3 3

HQ AFSC/MPAT 3 3

HQ AFSPACECOM/MPTT 2 2

HQ AFSPACECOM/TTGT 1 1

HQ ATC/DPAE 1 1

HQ ATC/TTOK 2 1

HQ ESC/TTGT 1 I

HQ ESC/DPTE 2 2

HQ MAC/DPAT 3 3

HQ MAC/TTGT I 1

HQ PACAF/TTGT 1 1

HQ PACAF/DPAT 3 3

HQ SAC/DPAT 3 3

HQ SAC/TTGT 1 1

HQ TAC/DPATJ 3 3

HQ TAC/TTGT 1 I

HQ USAF/SCBH 1 1

HQ USAF/DPPE 1

HQ USAFE/DPAT 3 3

HQ USAFE/TTGT 1 1HQ USMC (CODE TPI) 1

NODAC3300 TCHTW/TTGX (KEESLER AFB MS) 5 2 5

3300 TCHTW/TTS (KEESLER AFB MS) 1 1

DET 3, USAFOMC (KEESLER AFB MS) 1 I I 1

USAFOMC/OMYXL 10 2m 5 10

3507 ACS/DPKI 1

m = microfiche onlyh = hard copy only

Li

Page 3: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGENUMBER

PREFACE . . .............................. Ill

SUMMARY OF RESULTS ..... . . . . . ...... ........ iv

INTRODUCTION . . . .......................... 1

Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

SURVEY METHODOLOGY .... ............... . ....... .. 2

Survey Development ...................... . 2Survey Administration . . . ........ . . . . . . . . . 2Survey Sample . . . . . .................. 3Task Factor Administration ................... 3

SPECIALTY JOBS (Career Ladder Structure) ....... .............. 5

Specialty Structure Overview . . . . . . . . . ......... 5Group Descriptions ....................... 8Comparison of Specialty Jobs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Comparison to Previous Survey .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

ANALYSIS OF 491Xl/X2 DAFSC GROUPS .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Skill-Level Descriptions . .......... . . . . . . . 22

AFR 39-1 SPECIALTY DESCRIPTIONS FOR AFSCs 49lX1/X2 . . . . . . . 33

ANALYSIS OF CONUS VERSUS OVERSEAS GROUPS ........... . . . 33

AFSC 491X1/X2 TRAINING ANALYSIS .. ................. 35

Training Emphasis and Task Difficulty Data ............ . . . 35AFSC 491Xl Training Issues .............. . . . . 39AFSC 491X2 Training Issues ................. . . 47

JOB SATISFACTION ANALYSIS ..... ............... ......... . 60

IMPLICATIONS ..... ....... ... ............................ 65

APPENDIX A . ...................... . . . . . . . 67

11

Page 4: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

PREFACE

This Occupational Survey Report (OSR) presents the results of a detailedAir Force occupational survey of two career ladders within the Comrunications.- 7

Computer career field. Specialties covered in this report include: Communi-cationsrComputer Systems Operations (AFSC 491X1), and ConumunicationsýComputerSystems Programming (AFSC 491X2). Authority for conducting occupational sur-veys is contained in AFR 35-2. Computer products used in this report areavailable for use by operations and training officials. KZ ic0'k: Jok civztý61*S1

The survey instrument for this project was developed by Mr Ted Wilcox,Occupational Analyst. TSgt Joseph Seitz provided computer support for theproject. First Lieutenant William P. Knoll, Occupational Analyst, analyzedthe data and wrote the final report. Administrative support was provided byMs Linda Cole. This report has been reviewed by Mr Gerald R. Clow, Chief,Management Applications Branch, USAF Occupational Measurement Center, RandolphAir Force Base, Texas 78150-5000.

Copies of this report are distributed to Air Staff sections, major com-mands, and other interested training and management personnel (see distribu-tion on page 1). Additional copies are available upon request to the USAFOccupational Measurement Center, Attention: Chief, Occupational AnalysisDivision (OMY), Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

RONALD C. BAKER, Colonel, USAF JOSEPH S. TARTELLCommander Chief, Occupational Analysis DivisionUSAF Occupational Measurement USAF'Occupational MeasurementCenter Center

Accession ForNTIS GRA&I

DTIC TABr 6unannouno@ 13 r- V -,C.44".Justification(*

CAW,.....Distribution/ _ ,, /

Availability Code$Avalif. and/or•,cAJLdd

Dist Special

Page 5: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

1. SURVEY COVERAGE: Survey results are based on responses from a representa-tive sample of 3,452 AFSC 491XX personnel. This was broken down into 2,673AFSC 49lXl personnel, and 669 AFSC 491X2 career ladder members.

2. SPECIALTY STRUCTURE: Analysis identified five jobs and four clusters con-taining a large number of jobs within them. Most of these jobs are distinctin the functions they perform, with each career ladder largely possessing verydistinct duties. AFSC 491X1 career ladder personnel exhibited a large amountof diversity, while the 491X2 career ladder was relatively homogeneous.

3. CAREER LADDER PROGRESSION: In both of these Communications-Computercareer ladders, 3-and 5-skill level personnel are performing essentially thesame functions. Systems Operations 7-skill level personnel have a clear anddefinite shift toward supervisory functions. Seven-skill level Systems Pro-grammers have a slight shift toward supervisory duties, although the vastmajority of their time is still spent on technical duties. DAFSC 49199 per-sonnel and 49100 CEM Code personnel have an entirely supervisory and mana-gerial Job. AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions are generally very descriptiveof each career ladders' responsibilities.

4. TRAINING ANALYSIS: The STSs and POIs from both career ladders need to bereviewed. According to guidelines in ATCR 52-22, elements in both career lad-ders' STSs have 3-skill level proficiency coding above that which is indicatedby survey data. In addition, both STSs have 3-skill level proficiency codingbelow that which survey data indicates. The POIs from both career laddershave unsupported objectives as well as tasks which should be reviewed forpossible inclusion in the training courses.

5. JOB SATISFACTION: AFSC 49lX1 personnel express positive job satisfactionindicators which are approximately equal to that of a comparative sample con-sisting of other Direct Support career ladders surveyed in 1987. AFSC 491X2personnel generally had higher Job interest, however their reenlistment inten-tions were lower than that of the comparative sample. In both career ladders,job satisfaction tended to increase with experience. Specialty jobs havingthe highest job satisfaction include: Computer Programmers, Technical SchoolPersonnel, and Systems Implementation Personnel. Those Jobs having lower Jobsatisfaction include: Message Distribution Center Personnel, and SwitchboardOperators.

6. IMPLICATIONS: Both career ladders appear stable as all major functionsidentified In pTevious surveys were once again identified in this survey. The491X2 career ladder was relatively homogeneous, with the 491X1 career ladderdisplaying more heterogeneity. The 491X1 and 491X2 Specialty Training Stand-ards need to be reviewed by training personnel and functional managers. Inaddition, the POIs from both career ladders need to be reviewed by trainingpersonnel.

iv

Page 6: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

Based on such factors as 1) the large number of common tasks performedbetween the two clusters which aligned with different pre-merger AFSCs; 2) thestable and positive job satisfaction expressed by survey respondents; and 3)the results of the comparisons to previous surveys which identified all majorfunctions performed by the pre-merger AFSCs, the formation of the 491X1 speci-alty seems to be supported by the results of this survey.

v

Page 7: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY REPORTCOMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS OPERATIONS AND PROGRAMMING

(AFSC 49lXl/X2)

INTRODUCTION

This report summarizes the results of an occupational survey of two AirForce specialties contained within the Communications-Computer (AFSC 491XX)career field. The survey was requested by HQ USAF/SCBH to assess the impactof merging various AFSCs to form the 49lX1/X2 specialties and to gather datafor assessing training needs for these career ladders. This is the firstoccupational survey for these career ladders since the merger which createdthese Air Force specialties.

Background

The Communications-Computer Systems Operations career ladder (AFSC 49lXI)was created in 1984 to incorporate the Computer Operations specialty (AFSC511XO); the Telecommunications Operations specialty (AFSC 291X1); and theAutomated Digital Switching specialty (AFSC 295X0) into one Air Force spe-cialty. The merger of these specialties was necessary due to the increasingsimilarity of the communications and computer systems used by the three spe-cialties. At the same time, the Communications-Computer Systems Programmingcareer ladder (AFSC 491X2) was created by combining the Computer Programmingspecialty (AFSC 511XI) and the communications programmers (D-prefix personnel)from the Telecommunications Operations specialty (AFSC D291XO) and theAutomated Digital Switching specialty (AFSC D295Xo).

The Communications-Computer Systems Operations career ladder (AFSC 491X1)is responsible for preparing communications-computer equipment for operation,operating communui cations-computer equipment, performing authorized operatormaintenance on communications-computer equipment, performing system productcontrol, and serving as magnetic media librarians. The Communications-Computer Systems Programing career ladder (AFSC 491X2) is responsible forpreparing block diagrams, flowcharts, and computer program coding; preparing,testing, and documenting computer routines, programs, and systems; schedulingand controlling communications-computer input and output; and analyzing andupdating existing programs.

Initial training for AFSC 491Xl personnel is provided in a 45-day Cate-gory "AN course at Keesler AFB MS. This course, E3ABR49131, includes instruc-tion on communications-computer system operation fundamentals, mini or largescale communications-computer operations, and introductory data processing.Upon completion of this course, graduates are awarded a 3-skill level and are

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

Page 8: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

assigned to units worldwide. Initial training for the AFSC 491X2 career lad-der is also provided at Keesler AFB. This 55-day, Category "A" course,E3ABR49132, introduces personnel to problem solving, structured programming,various high-order languages, system level operations, and project acceptancetesting. Upon completion of this course, graduates are awarded a 3-skilllevel and assigned to units worldwide.

SURVEY METHODOLOGY

Survey Development

Data for this survey were collected using USAF Job Inventory AFPT90-491-811, dated August 1987. After reviewing pertinent career ladderpublications and tasks from previous survey instruments, the inventory devel-oper prepared a preliminary task list. This task list was then refined andvalidated through personal interviews with subject-matter experts at basesrepresentative of both career ladders to ensure thorough coverage of thevarious functions performed within the career ladders. In addition, subject-matter experts representing the major commands and the Air Staff reviewed andvalidated the survey instrument at a validation workshop held at the Occupa-tional Measurement Center, Randolph AFB TX.

The final job inventory consisted of 609 tasks divided into 18 functionalareas or duties. The inventory also contained a background section whichincluded questions on equipment use, grade, Total Active Federal MilitaryService (TAFMS), and job title.

Survey Administration

From September 1987 through March 1988, survey control officers atConsolidated Base Personnel Offices worldwide distributed the inventory to arandom sample of AFSC 49lX1/X2 personnel. Participants were selected from acomputer-generated mailing list provided by the Air Force Human ResourcesLaboratory.

To complete the survey, each incumbent first answered the backgroundquestions, then marked the tasks he or she performed. Finally, the incumbentrated each task performed according to the relative time spent performing thattask. Ratings range from 1 (a very small amount of time spent) to 9 (a verylarge amount of time spent). As part of the computer analysis, all of anincumbent's ratings are combined and the total is assumed to represent 100percent of the individual's time on the job. Each rating is then divided bythis total and multiplied by 100 to give the relative percent time spent foreach task. This procedure provides a basis for comparison of tasks in termsof percent members performing and average percent time spent.

2

Page 9: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

Survey Sample

With over 15,000 members assigned to the two career ladders, a randomstratified selection process was used to select career field members as surveyparticipants and to ensure a proportional representation of major commands andmilitary paygrades in the sample. A total of 4,517 incumbents were randomlyselected to receive a job inventory booklet. Table 1 reflects the distribu-tion by MAJCOM, as of September 1987, of the assigned population, as well asthe distribution across the final survey sample. The 3,452 respondents in thefinal sample represent 76 percent of those receiving inventory booklets.Overall, the final sample consisted of 2,673 DAFSC 49IXl respondents and 669DAFSC 491X2 respondents.

Task Factor Administration

In addition to collecting task performance data, the survey administra-tion process involves collecting task factor ratings of task difficulty (TD)and training emphasis (TE). These ratings are collected from senior NCOsrandomly selected to represent their career ladder, and are processed separa-tely from task performance data.

Task difficultx (TD) refers to the length of time required for the aver-age job incumbent to learn to do a task. To complete the TD booklet, eachsenior NCO rated inventory tasks with which they were familiar on a 9-pointscale, ranging from extremely low relative difficulty (a rating of 1) toextremely high relative difficulty (a rating of 9). Separate ratings werecomputed for each career ladder. The interrater reliability of the TO dataprovided by 110 AFSC 491X1 NCOs was .97. The 55 AFSC 491X2 NCOs providing TDratings also had an interrater reliability of .97. These interraterreliabilities indicate an excellent degree of agreement. Each set of TDratings was adjusted to give a rating of 5.00 to a task of average difficulty,with a standard deviation of 1.00. The TD ratings provide a rank-orderedlisting of the tasks in the inventory by degree of learning difficulty.

Training emphasis (TE) refers to the importance of structured training(through res dent technical schools, field training detachments, formal OJT,etc.) of particular tasks for first-enlistment personnel. Individuals comple-ting TE booklets rated tasks on a 10-point scale, ranging from a blank (notraining emphasis) to 9 (extremely heavy training required). The TE ratingsprovide a rank-ordered listing of tasks from high to low training emphasis.Separate ratings were computed for each career ladder.

The interrater reliability for the 104 NCOs in AFSC 491XI was .97. Theaverage TE rating was 1.70, with a standard deviation of 1.43. Tasks ratedabove 3.13 are considered high in training emphasis for AFSC 491Xi first-enlistment personnel. The 51 AFSC 491X2 TE raters had an interrater relia-bility of .92, with an average TE rating of 1.88 and a standard deviation of1.41. Tasks above 3.29 are considered high in training emphasis for AFSC491X2 first-enlistment personnel. As was the case with the TD interraterreliabilities, both career ladders displayed excellent degrees of agreement.

3

Page 10: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

L..

TABLE 1

COMMAND DISTRIBUTION OF SURVEY SAMPLE

COMMAND AFSC 491X1 AFSC 491X2

PERCENT OF PERCENT OF PERCENT OF PERCENT OFASSIGNED SAMPLE ASSIGNED SAMPLE

AFCC 75 65 44 46AFSC 2 2 5 7AFSPACECOM 3 4 3 4ATC 1 2 4 4ESC 3 4 2 3MAC 3 4 2 4MPC 1 1 3 5PACAF 1 2 .SAC 1 2 3 4TAC 2 4 5 7USAFE 1 3 1 1AF ELEMENTS 3 1 4 2OTHER 5 6 24 13

AFSC 491XI AFSC 491X2

TOTAL ASSIGNED 11,921 3,129TOTAL ELIGIBLE FOR SURVEY 3,577 779TOTAL IN SAMPLE 2,673 669PERCENT OF ASSIGNED IN SAMPLE 22% 21%PERCENT OF ELIGIBLE SELECTED IN SAMPLE 75% 86%

TOTAL ASSIGNED (ALL AFSC 491XX PERSONNEL) - 15,050TOTAL AFSC 491XX PERSONNEL IN FINAL SAMPLE - 3,452PERCENT OF TOTAL AFSC 491XX PERSONNEL IN SAMPLE - 23%

- Indicates less than 1 percent* Stratified random sample (excludes those in PCS status, hospital, or lessthan 6 weeks on the Job)

4

Page 11: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

When used in conjunction with other information, such as percent membersperforming, TD and TE ratings can provide insight into training requirements.Such insight may help validate lengthening or shortening instruction support-ing AFSC-needed knowledqes or skills.

SPECIALTY JOBS(Career Ladder Structure)

An important function of the USAF Occupational Analysis Program isexamining a career ladder's structure. Based on incumbent responses to thesurvey, groups of incumbents spending similar amounts of time performingsimilar tasks are identified. Individuals performing many of the same tasksand spending similar amounts of time on those tasks group together to describea job performed in the career ladder. When there are variations in the com-binations of tasks and time spent on tasks by sample respondents, differentjobs are identified. When there is a substantial degree of similarity betweendifferent jobs, they are grouped together and labeled as clusters. In thisway, the basic structure of the careur ladder, in terms of the jobs performedand their relationship to each other, is described. This analysis provides afoundation for evaluating other aspects of the career ladder, such as person-nel classification, AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions, and training considera-tions.

Specialty Structure Overview

Responses from AFSC 491X2 personnel indicate a career ladder which isvery homogeneous. The computerized AFSC 491X2 career ladder job descriptions..ws a number of tasks performed by over 50 percent of the survey respond-ents. These tasks appear below and account for approximately 17 percent ofAFSC 491X2 personnel's job time.

Debug computer programsCode computer programs in high level compiler languagesCompile or assemble programsDesk check programsDetermine causes of abnormal program haltsTest computer programsWork with users in resolving computer software

malfunctions or problemsReview source code listingsMaintain source code listingsDesign input or output formats

In addition, AFSC 491X2 personnel spend a large amount of their time, 41 per-cent, in one duty (Duty 0, Performing Software Development, Implementation,and Maintenance).

5

Page 12: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

The 491XV career ladder was much more heterogeneous than the 491X2 careerladder, as the jobs identified aligned functionally with one of the pre-mergerAFSCs. Even so, AFSC 491XI personnel performed many tasks which were commonacross all jobs. Examples of these tasks appear below.

Distribute messages or output productsMount or dismount magnetic mediaEscort visitors through facilitiesCheck operational status of equipmentRespond to system requestsMake entries on shift supervisor logsNotify affected personnel, such as supervisors or

remote users, of machine failures or downtimePower up or power down communications-computer systems

equipmentAuthorize or deny access to restricted or controlled

areas or classified materials

Based on variations in combinations of tasks performed, structure analysisidentified four clusters and five separate jobs within the survey sample. Thedivision of jobs performed within the AFSC 491XI/X2 career ladders is shownbelow. The number of personnel in each group (N) is also shown. Figure 1shows the major functional areas identified in the job structure analysis.

491XX Specialty Jobs

I. COMPUTER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL (N=856)

A. Computer Operators (N=567)B. Magnetic Media Librarians (N=75)C. Systems Security Personnel (N=12)D. Production Control Personnel (N=114)

II. COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS PERSONNEL (N=822)

A. Telecommunications Operators (N=634)B. Switching Center Personnel (N=13)C. Mobility Personnel (N=98)D. Telecommunications Security Personnel (N=12)E. Traffic Analyses Personnel (N=44)

III. FUNCTIONAL AREA MANAGERS (N=636)

A. Communicatikns-Computer Supervisors (N=344)B. COMSEC Accountants (N-166)C. Unit Security Managers (N=32)D. Contracting and Budgeting Personnel (N-17)E. Switchboard Supervisors (N=14)F. Unit Training Managers (N=21)

6

Page 13: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

F= -

C),

(~() 9Em cn

LUJ

C-CD

LUJ

LO 0

Q LU

-i

V)0

C)-

Page 14: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

IV. COMPUTER PROGRAMMERS (N=635)

A. Applications Programmers (N=303)B. Programmer Analysts (N=69)C. Data Base Analysts (N=ll)D. Assembly Language Programmers (N=46)E. Security Programmers (N=lO)F. Computer Operations Specialists (N=17)G. Systems Testing Personnel (N=15)H. Programming NCOICs (N=18)

V. MESSAGE DISTRIBUTION CENTER PERSONNEL (N=22)

VI. TECHNICAL SCHOOL PERSONNEL (T-PREFIX) (N=28)

VII. SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION PERSONNEL (N=17)

VIII. RESOURCE MANAGERS (N=38)

IX. SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS (N=33)

The respondents forming these clusters and jobs account for 89 percent ofthe survey sample. The remaining 11 percent did not group with any of theclusters or independent jobs because of the uniqueness of the job they performor the manner in which they responded to the tasks listed in the job inven-tory.

Group Descriptions

The following paragraphs briefly describe the different clusters and jobsidentified in the analysis of the 49lXX career ladders. Table 2 providesselective background data on these groups. Time spent on duties for eachgroup identified is displayed in Table 3. For a more detailed listing ofrepresentative tasks and a summary of background data on these jobs, seeAppendix A.

I. COMPUTER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL CLUSTER (N=856). Comprised of fivedifferent jobs, tNe86ri Rin forming this cluster grouped together based onthe time spent and performance of common computer operations tasks. The larg-est percentage of these respondents' Job time (39 percent) is spent in Duty F,PERFORMING COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS OPERATOR FUNCTIONS, followed by 18percent job time spent in Duty E, PERFORMING GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTERSYSTEMS FUNCTIONS. Composed almost entirely of AFSC 491X1 personnel, thiscluster represents 32 percent of the 491X sample. A relatively junior group,45 percent of these respondents are in their first enlistment, 60 percent arewithin 1-48 months Time In Career Field (TICF), and 77 percent hold either a3- or 5-skill level. The average TICF is 54 months, with an average TAFMS of72 months. Although assigned to all organizational levels, these incumbentstend to be assigned at the squadron or group level.

8

Page 15: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 2

SELECTED BACKGROUND DATA FOR SPECIALTY JOBS

COMPUTER OPS COMMUNICATION OPS FUNCTIONALPERSONNEL PERSONNEL AREA MANAGERS

NUMBER IN GROUP 856 822 636PERCENT OF SAMPLE 25 24 18

DAFSC:

49131 14 13 249151 63 73 3049171 22 13 5449132 - - -49152 - - 249172 - - 249199 - - 8CEM CODE 00 - - 3

PREDOMINANT PAYGRADES E-4 E-4 E-6AVERAGE TICF (W3S) 54 53 126AVERAGE TAFMS (MOS) 72 66 163PERCENT IN FIRST ENLISTMENT 45 47 8AVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED 63 66 78

- Indicates less than 1 percent

9

Page 16: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 2 (CONTINUED)

SELECTED BACKGROUND DATA FOR SPECIALTY JOBS

MESSAGEDISTRIBUTION TECHNICAL SYSTEMS

COMPUTER CENTER SCHOOL IMPLEMENTATIONPROGRAMMERS PERSONNEL PERSONNEL PERSONNEL

NUMBER IN GROUP 635 22 28 17PERCENT OF SAMPLE 18 - 1 -

49131 1 4149151 5 50 39 1249171 4 9 25 59

- 49132 8- -*49152 45 -18

- 49172 34 11 24* 49199 2 4 6

CEM CODE 00 - 4

PREDOMINANT PAYGRADES E-5 E-4 E-5 E-7AVERAGE TICF (MOS) 56 35 90 137AVERAGE TAFMS (MOS) 107 51 126 178PERCENT IN FIRST ENLISTMENT 25 65 - -AVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED 85 20 30 72

- Indicates less than I percent

10

Page 17: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 2 (CONTINUED)

SELECTED BACKGROUND DATA FOR SPECIALTY

RESOURCE SWITCHBOARDMANAGERS OPERATORS

NUMBER IN GROUP 38 33PERCENT OF SAMPLE 1 1

DAFSC:

49131 5 949151 42 9149171 39 -49132 "49152 549172 549199 3CEM CODE 00

PREDOMINANT PAYGRADES E-5 E-3/4AVERAGE TICF EMOS) 79 29AVERAGE TAF14S (MOS) 117 40PERCENT IN FIRST ENLISThENT 24 70AVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED 36 20

-Indicates less than 1 percent

11]

Page 18: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 3

RELATIVE TIME SPENT ON DUTIES BY SPECIALTY JOBS

COMPUTER OPS COMMUNICATIONS OPS FUNCTIONAL AREADUTIES PERSONNEL PERSONNEL MANAGERS

A ORGANIZING AND PLANNING 3 2 12

B DIRECTING AND IMPLEMENTING 3 2 10

C INSPECTING AND EVALUATING 2 2 12

D TRAINING 4 3 8

E PERFORMING GENERALCOMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTERSYSTEMS FUNCTIONS 18 14 9

F PERFORMING C-C SYSTEMSOPERATOR FUNCTIONS 39 19 5

G PERFORMING PRODUCTION CONTROLOR SYSTEMS MONITOR FUNCTIONS 6 1 1

H PERFORMING GENERALCOMMUNICATIONS FUNCTIONS 1 2

I PROCESSING MESSAGES 1 22 2

J PERFORMING TELECOMMUNICATIONSTRAFFIC ANALYSES FUNCTIONS 5 1

K PERFORMING MAGNETIC MEDIALIBRARY FUNCTION 8 2

L PERFORMING C-C MOBILITYFUNCTIONS 2 1

M OPERATING NON-MOBILETELEPHONE SWITCHBOARDS 2 1

N PERFORMING SOFTWARE PLANNINGAND DESIGN 1

0 PERFORMING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT,IMPLEMENTATION, AND MAINTENANCE 3

P PERFORMING SOFTWARE TESTING,QUALITY ASSURANCE ANDCONFIGURATION MGT FUNCTIONS 1

Q MAINTAINING SECURITY 9 21 28

R PERFORMING SUPPLY ORCONTRACTING FUNCTIONS 2 1 6

- Indicates less than 1 percent* Columns may not add to 100 percent due to rounding

12

Page 19: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

4

TABLE 3 (CONTINUED)

RELATIVE TIME SPENT ON DUTIES BY SPECIALTY JOBS

MESSAGE TECHNICAL SYSTEMSCOMPUTER DIST CENTER SCHOOL IMPLEMENTATION

DUTIES PROGRAMMERS PERSONNEL PERSONNEL PERSONNEL

A ORGANIZING AND PLANNING 2 1 3 8 d

B DIRECTING AND IMPLEMENTING 2 1 4 5

C INSPECTING AND EVALUATING 1 -4 8

D TRAINING 3 1 58 3

E PERFORMING GENERALCOMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTERSYSTEM FUNCTIONS 8 29 5 11

F PERFORMING C-C SYSTEMSOPERATING FUNCTIONS 8 11 9 3

G PERFORMING PRODUCTIONCONTROL OR SYSTEMSMONITORING FUNCTIONS 2 1 - 2

H PERFORMING GENERALCOMMUNICATIONS FUNCTIONS - 1

I PROCESSING MESSAGES 27 1 -

J PERFORMING TELECOMMUNI-CATIONS TRAFFIC ANALYSESFUNCTIONS 4

K PERFORMING MAGNETIC MEDIALIBRARY FUNCTION 1 1

L PERFORMING C-C MOBILITYFUNCTIONS " "

M OPERATING NON-MOBILETELEPHONE SWITCHBOARDS -

N PERFORMING SOFTWARE PLANNINGAND DESIGN 14 1 26

0 PERFORMING SOFTWAREDEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION,AND MAINTENANCE 44 9 13

P PERFORMING SOFTWARE TESTING,QUALITY ASSURANCE ANDCONFIGURATION MGT FUNCTIONS 7 - 10

Q MAINTAINING SECURITY 5 23 3 2

R PERFORMING SUPPLY ORCONTRACTING FUNCTIONS 2 7

- Indicates less than 1 percent* Columns may not add to 100 percent due to rounding

13,!

Page 20: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 3 (CONTINUED)

RELATIVE TIME SPENT ON DUTIES BY SPECIALTY JOBS

DUTIES RESOURCE MANAGERS SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS

A ORGANIZING AND PLANNING 5 2

B DIRECTING AND IMPLEMENTING 4 3

C INSPECTING AND EVALUATING 3 1

D TRAINING 1 5

E PERFORMING GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS FUNCTIONS 9 7

F PERFORMING C-C SYSTEMS OPERATORFUNCTIONS 4 2

G PERFORMING PRODUCTION CONTROL ORSYSTEMS MONITOR FUNCTIONS 1

H PERFORMING GENERAL COMMUNICATIONSFUNCTIONS -

I PROCESSING MESSAGES 1 1

J PERFORMING TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1 -

K PERFORMING MAGNETIC MEDIA LIBRARYFUNCTION -

L PERFORMING C-C MOBILITY FUNCTIONS 1

M OPERATING NON-MOBILE TELEPHONESWITCHBOARDS 70

N PERFORMING SOFTWARE PLANNING AND DESIGN 1 -

0 PERFORMING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT,IMPLEMENTATION, AND MAINTENANCE 3

P PERFORMING SOFTWARE TESTING, QUALITYASSURANCE AND CONFIGURATION MGTFUNCTIONS !

Q MAINTAINING SECURITY 2 9

R PERFORMING SUPPLY OR CONTRACTINGFUNCTIONS 68

- Indicates less than 1 percent* Columns may not add to 100 percent due to rounding

14

Page 21: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

In addition, 77 percent of these respondents reported working in a DataProcessing Center. Tasks representative of Computer Operations Personnel areshown below.

Request system information via consoleNotify affected personnel, such as supervisors or

remote users, of machine failures or downtimeMount or dismount magnetic mediaEscort visitors through facilitiesInitialize processing, such as batched job, on-line,

or off-lineIsolate causes of machine stops or malfunctions

Of the five jobs identified within this cluster, the largest was theCOMPUTER OPERATORS with 567 members. This job is the core group which makesup the cluster. Aside frcm a 5 percent increase in the time spent in Duty F,PERFORMING COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS OPERATOR FUNCTIONS, the, basicbackground characteristics and tasks performed by the members of this jobclosely approximates the cluster. The next job, MAGNETIC MEDIA LIBRARIANS(N.75), is distinguished by responsibility for, and the large amount of timespen handling magnetic media. These incumbents were the most junior in thecluster, averaging only 44 months in the career field and 53 months TAFMS.SYSTEMS SECURITY PERSONNEL (N-12) was the next job identified in the cluster.These airmen were dlstinguished by an increased emphasis on security-relatedtasks, such as storing or safeguarding classified materials, destroying clas-sified or sensitive material, and reporting security violations. Overall,personnel in this Job spend over 36 percent of their time dealing with secur-ity issues. In the next job identified, the incumbents performed many commontasks dealing with production control and systems monitoring. PRODUCTIONCONTROL PERSONNEL (N=124) perform a liaison role between the personnelrequesting computer products and the computer operators. These personnel alsoensure that computer requests are processed correctly and review outputproducts for accuracy. Many of the personnel in this group reported Jobtitles such as systems monitor, production control supervisors, and databasemanagers. Overall, the personnel in this cluster aligned functionally withthe technical operations performed by the former 511XO AFSC.

II. COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS PERSONNEL (N=822). The airmen in thiscluster grouped together based bn the common performance of tasks dealing withmessage processing, communications-computer systems functions, and communica-tions-computer systems operator functions. The personnel in this group werealso somewhat Junior, with 47 percent of the respondents in their firstenlistment, 59 percent within 1-48 months TICF, and 86 percent holding a 3- or5-skill level. Seventy-eight percent of these people reported working at thesquadron or group level, while 70 percent reported working at a Base Communi-cations Center or Telecommunications Center (BCC/TCC). Typical tasks per-formed by the members of this cluster include:

15

S- • . . • ;-.. . : • . " .':: ' •T " *- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --.. . .. .. . ..

Page 22: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

Prepare service messagesFollow up service messagesAnnotate time of transmission or receipt on messagesAssign routing indicatorsWitness destruction of classified materialsEscort visitors through facilitiesNotify addressees or distribution centers of high

precedence message receiptMake entries on DD Forms 1503 (Message Correction Notices)

Five jobs were identified in this cluster. The largest group,TELECOMMUNICATIONS OPERATORS (N=634), was more concentrated at the BCCs/TCCsthan the cluster, but otherwise mirrored the basic background characteristicsand time spent across duties as the cluster. The second group, SWITCHINGCENTER PERSONNEL (N=13), is responsible for handling large volumes of messagetraffic. These personnel were located at the various switching centersthroughout the world, or at AF bases which handle large volumes of messagetraffic. In addition to their message processing tasks, these personnel alsoperformed more general communications tasks, such as placing remote terminalsor switching circuits into or out of service and making entries on interceptlogs. Due to the large volume of message traffic they handle, these airmenalso spend a substantial amount of time (30 percent) performingcommunications-computer systems operator functions. The third job identifiedin this cluster was MOBILITY PERSONNEL (N=98). These personnel spend amajority of their time performing mobility and security tasks, such ascamouflaging mobile communications equipment, performing guard duty, erectingtactical air base contonement areas, and setting up and operating mobile com-munications equipment. These respondents were located primarily in Communica-tions Combat Groups, with some respondents also located at an Advanced SectorOperations Center. The next group in this cluster, TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECU-RITY PERSONNEL (N=12), performed a very narrow job which emphasized mainte-nance of security along with their message processing functions. Common tasksof this job include: stamping messages with special handling, precedence, orclassification; preparing service messages; and storing or safeguarding clas-sified material. The final job identified in this cluster is TRAFFIC ANALYSESPERSONNEL (N=44). These personnel monitor incoming and outgoing messagetraffic and spend much of their time reviewing messages for proper handlingand accuracy, reviewing traffic logs or files, and maintaining records oftraffic volume. These personnel were the most experienced in the cluster,averaging 73 months TICF and 90 months TAFMS. Of the five jobs in thiscluster, one job, SWITCHING CENTER PERSONNEL, aligned functionally with theformer 295X0 AFSC, while the other four jobs aligned functionally with theformer 291XO AFSC.

III. FUNCTIONAL AREA MANAGERS (N=636). These are the supervisors ofcommunications-computer operations and managers of the various functionalareas primarily within the Communications-Computer Systems Operations careerladder. Eighty-six percent of this cluster are AFSC 491Xl personnel, while 67percent of the cluster hold a 7-skill level or higher. These incumbents arerelatively experienced, with an average of 126 months TICF and 163 months

16

Page 23: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

STAFMS. Personnel in this cluster spend a total of 42 percent of their jobtime performing supervisory, managerial, and training duties, and spendanother 28 percent of their job time maintaining security. Tasks representa-tive of this cluster include:

Establish organizational policies, officeinstructions (01) or standard operating procedures

Determine work prioritiesCounsel personnel on personal or military-related

mattersPrepare APRDevelop work methods or proceduresStore or safeguard classified materialDetermine requirements for space, personnel, equipment

or supplies

Six separate jobs were differentiated within this cluster. The largestjob, COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SUPERVISORS (N=344), spent their time supervisingthe personnel and operations within either a BCC/TCC, data processing center,or other communications-computer operations. Common job titles given by thisgroup include NCOIC BCC/TCC, NCOIC Data Processing Center, or Chief/NCOICComputer Operations. The next two jobs identified within this cluster dealprimarily with security. COMSEC ACCOUNTANTS (N=166) are responsible for thehandling of all cryptographic materials and equipment within their unit. UNITSECURITY MANAGERS (N-32) spend 47 percent of their time dealing with secur-Tryand 45 percent of their time performing supervisory, managerial, and trainingfunctions. These personnel are responsible for the security within theirunits, to include planning, evaluating, and implementing security programs,conducting security briefings or debriefings, performing physical and adminis-trative security inspections, and designating classified materials fordestruction. Personnel in the fourth job, CONTRACTING AND BUDGETING PERSONNEL(N17), were those supervisors who also coordinated the procurement of equip-ment utilized in the computer systems area. Confirming contract terms,researching the status of purchase orders, and preparing procurement documentsare common activities of the personnel in this Job. UNIT TRAINING MANAGERS(N-21) was the next job identified in the cluster. These airmen are respon-siblefor planning, implementing, conducting, and evaluating all on-the-jobtraining within their unit. These respondents spend a total of 38 percent oftheir job time dealing specifically with training and another 30 percent oftheir job time performing supervisory and managerial functions. The last jobidentified in this cluster was the SWITCHBOARD OPERATOR SUPERVISORS (N-l4).Members of this group spend a total of 50 percent of their job time on thesupervision, management, and training of SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS (this job willbe discussed later). An additional 27 percent of their Jobtime was spentperforming non-mobile telephone switchboard operations, such as compiling andmaintaining telephone directories and placing calls between subscribers.

17

Page 24: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

IV. COMPUTER PROGRAIM4ERS (N=635). Eighty-seven percent of the AFSC 491X2personnel-Tn th~esample were fnWtfis cluster, so the following is essentiallya description of the AFSC 491X2 career ladder. Cluster members spend anaverage of 44 percent of their job time in one Duty 0, PERFORMING SOFTWAREDEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MAINTENANCE. Another 14 percent of theirtime is spent in Duty N, SOFTWARE PLANNING AND DESIGN, while 7 percent oftheir time is spent performing software testing and quality assurance.Average TICF for this cluster is 56 months, with the average TAFMS being 107months. The difference between the TAFMS and TICF indicates a substantialnumber of members of this cluster have spent time outside the career fieldbefore obtaining the 491X2 AFSC. Tasks representative of computer programmersare shown below and are similar to those tasks presented in the SpecialtyStructure Overview.

Debug computer programsCompile or assemble programsDetermine causes of abnormal program haltsDesk check programsCode computer programs in high level compiler languagesTest computer programsMaintain source code listingsReview source code listings

A total of eight jobs were identified in this cluster. The largest Jobidentified was the APPLICATIONS PROGRAMMERS (N-303), which accounted for 48percent of the cluster. These airmen develop, implement, and maintainsoftware, and perform many tasks common across the AFSC 491X2 career ladder.The next job identified was the PROGRAMMER ANALYSTS (N-69). These were seniorpersonnel who identified themselves with titles such as NCOIC or chief of asoftware support or development branch. PROGRAMMER ANALYSTS coordinate andset specifications for the development of software. DATA BASE ANALYSTS (N11)was the third job identified. These personnel write programs which interactwith data bases and provide specifications for data base systems. ASSEMBLYLANGUAGE PROGRAMMERS (N-46) was the fourth job identified in this cluster.These personnel were located primarily at Tinker AFB OK, Offutt AFB NE, andLangley AFB VA, and write programs primarily in assembly language. SECURITYPROGRAMMERS (N-10) was the next job identified within this ciuster. Thissmall group of personnel had an increased emphasis on maintaining security anddealt with programming on classified projects. Six of the 10 members withinthis group reported programning on the Airborne Warning and Control System.COMPUTER OPERATIONS SPECIALISTS (N-17) was the next Job Identified. Theserespondents performed a very broad Job consisting of very little programmingtasks, and instead performed many computer operator functions. SYSTEMSTESTING PERSONNEL (N-15) was the seventh job identified. These personnel wereresponsilbe for preparing tests, performing tests, and analyzing the resultsof those tests on computer systems. The final job identified in the clusterwas the PROGRAMMING NCOIC'S (N=18). These respondents were senior programmerswho also held supervisory duties. Although NCOIC was a common term used intheir job titles, these airmen still performed a very technical job.

18

Page 25: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

V. MESSAGE DISTRIBUTION CENTER PERSONNEL (N=22). Members of this groupwork in the message distributi•Z centers within-!ie-"CCs/TCCs and are respon-sible for the distribution and dissemination of all output products (primarilymessages). These airmen spend a majority of their time performing communica-tions-computer systems functions, message processing functions, and maintain-ing security. This is a relatively inexperienced group, with 41 percent ofthe members having less than one year in the career field, and 73 percent ofthese members having less than one year in their job. Representative tasks ofthese AFSC 491X1 incumbents are shown below:

Notify addressees or distribution centers of highprecedence message receipt

Separate incoming messages for distribution orcommercial refile

Stamp messages with special handling, precedence,or classification

Distribute messages or output productsPrepare unclassified media for mail, delivery,

or distributionDistribute classified material

VI. TECHNICAL SCHOOL PERSONNEL (N=28). Personnel in this Job were pri-marily locaated at Kees-ier F'W RanT represented the technical schools fromboth career ladders. Sixty-four percent of the members in this job held a491X1 DAFSC and 29 percent held a 491X2 DAFSC, with the remaining membersholding a 49199 or 49100 DAFSC. Although from different career ladders, thesepersonnel are responsible for providing technical training to students andgrouped together based on the performance of common training tasks. Theseairmen spend a total of 58 percent of their job time performing trainingtasks, such as:

Conduct resident course classroom trainingDevelop lesson plansScore testsAdminister testsDevelop training aidsWrite test questionsCounsel trainees on training programs

These personnel had a relatively high level of experience, with an aver-age of 90 months TICF and 126 months TAFWS.

VII. SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION PERSONNEL (N-17). These 17 members are con-cerned wIEEEWi implementation and InstaT Taon of computer systems. Thepersonnel in this job were the most experienced in the survey, averaging 136months in the career field and 178 months TAFNS. Twelve of these airmen held491XV DAFSCs, four held 491X2 DAFSCs, and one held a 49199 DAFSC. Representa-tive tasks performed in this job include:

19

Page 26: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

Review communications plansReview recommendations for proposed communications-

computer systems equipmentEvaluate suggestionsReport implementation status of new communications-

computer systems to using agenciesDevelop inputs to communications-computer systems

program plansReview communications-computer systems requirement

documentation (CSRD)

VIII. RESOURCE MANAGERS (N=38). Members of this group have a narrow jobdealing wTh the acquisition an'-dcontrol of all supplies and equipment withintheir unit. These personnel spend approximately 58 percent of their time per-forming supply and equipment management tasks, such as inventorying suppliesand equipment, inspecting supplies and equipment, and disposing of excess orunserviceable supplies and equipment. The members of this group were rela-tively experienced, with an average of 117 months TAFMS. Eighty-seven percentof these airmen hold a 491X1 DAFSC. Representative tasks of this job include:

Receipt for supplies or equipmentPlace supplies or equipment in storageMaintain equipment custodian accountsTurn in excess or unserviceable parts, supplies,

and equipmentReview communications-computer systems excess or

availability bulletins

IX. SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS (N=33). These personnel performed a distinctand narrow job centering on the operation of telephone switchboards. Themembers of this job were the most junior of all the jobs identified in thesurvey, averaging just 29 months in the career field and 40 months TAFMS.Other than general security and communications-computer systems functions,these people performed no other mainstream communications-computer tasks,averaging approximately 70 percent of their time working telephone switch-boards. All 33 members in this group hold a 491X1 DAFSC. Common tasksperformed by these personnel include:

Accept and connect calls according to their precedenceMaintain status boards on location of commandersProcess telephone conference callsPlace calls between subscribers, other than special

handling callsMonitor high precedence or emergency calls

"20

Page 27: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

Comparison of Specialty Jobs

Four clusters and five jobs were identified within these twoCommunications-Computer career ladders. Two clusters of AFSC 491X1 personnel,the Computer Operations Personnel and the Communications Operations Personnel,aligned with pre-merger AFSCs. Although these two clusters were clearly dif-ferentiated, there were a large number of general communications-computersystems operation tasks and communications-computer operator tasks performedin common. This finding supports the merger and formation of the AFSC 491XVspecialty. The AFSC 491X2 career ladder was much more homogeneous than the49lXls, as most of these airmen grouped into the Computer Programmer cluster.Within that cluster, Applications Programmers accounted for 48 percent of thecluster members.

Between the two career ladders, career ladder responsibilities wereclearly distinct, as the majority of jobs were clearly dominated by members ofone career ladder.

Comparison to Previous Survey

The results of this survey were compared to the results of previous OSRscontaining the old Computer Operations specialty, Programming specialty,Telecommunications Operations specialty, and the Automatic Digital Switchingspecialty. Comparisons were difficult as the previous surveys were writtensystem specific and a large number of jobs were previously identified based onthe type of computer or communication system a group was working on, or by thelanguage used to write programs. However, most of the major jobs identifiedin the previous surveys were again identified in this survey. Examples ofjobs identified in the previous surveys but not in this survey include:AFSATCOM Operators, AUTODIN Operators, Digital Graphics Operators, SystemsAnalysis and Design Personnel, and COBOL Programmers. Examples of jobs iden-tified in this survey but not in previous surveys include: Message Distribu-tion Center Personnel, Assembly Language Programmers, Unit Training Managers,and Unit Security Managers. While these jobs may have existed when previoussurveys were conducted, they either were not identified as separate jobs orwere included in another job's responsibility.

ANALYSIS OF 491Xl/X2 DAFSC GROUPS

In addition to analyzing the career ladder structure, examining skilllevels is helpful in understanding a career ladder. The DAFSC analysiscompares skill levels, highlighting differences in the tasks performed at thedifferent levels. This information can be useful in evaluating how wellvarious career ladder documents, such as AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions andthe Specialty Training Standards (STS), reflect what career ladder personnelare actually doing in the field.

21

Page 28: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

In both career ladders, 3-skill level personnel were compared with5-skill level personnel. Only minor differences separated these skill levels;therefore, these skill levels were combined for the purpose of analysis. Boththe 491X1 and 491X2 career ladders converge at the 49199, Comnmunications-Computer Systems Superintendent level, and progress to the Communications-Computer Systems Manager CEM Code 49100 level. These DAFSCs were alsosurveyed and will be discussed.

The distribution of skill-level groups across career ladder jobs is dis-played in Table 4, while Table 5 offers another perspective by displaying therelative time spent on each duty across skill-level groups. A typical patternof progression is present across the AFSC 491X1 career ladder, as personnelspend more of their relative time on duties involving supervisory and manage-rial tasks as they move upward through the 7-skill to the 99/00 DAFSC.Although much less marked, this pattern is also evident in the AFSC 491X2career ladder.

Skill-Level Descriptions

DAFSC 49131/51. The 1,873 airmen in the 3- and 5-skill level group (70 per-cent of the AFSC 491Xl sample) perform an average of 61 tasks. Eighty-eightpercent of their time is spent performing technical tasks, such as powering upor powering down communications-computer systems equipment, mounting and dis-mounting magnetic media, and checking the operational status of equipment. Asshown in Table 5, a majority of their time is spent in Duties E, F, and Q.Seventy-four percent of this group is included in either the Computer Opera-tions job or the Communications Operations job. Table 6 displays tasks repre-sentative of the airmen in this group. These representative tasks dealprimarily with security, general communications-computer systems functions,and systems operator functions.

DAFSC 49171. This group consists of 800 individuals, accounting for 30 per-cent of the total AFSC 491Xl sample. They perform a broader job than 3- and5-skill level personnel, averaging 70 tasks, as opposed to 61 tasks for 3- and5-skill level personnel. Counseling personnel on personal or military-relatedproblems, determining work priorities, and coordinating with subscribers orcustomers on matters such as operational or procedural problems are all commontasks for this group. Additional representative tasks for these personnel areshown in Table 7. As these tasks show, there is a definite trend toward mana-gerial and supervisory tasks. Overall, 7-skill level personnel spend a totalof 36 percent of their job time on managerial, supervisory, and trainingduties, as opposed to only 12 percent spent by the 3-/5-skill level airmen.

The largest percentage (46) of 7-skill level personnel were found in theFunctional Area Managers job (see Table 4). This is consistent with their jobdescription, which identified supervisory tasks as being their most commonly

22

Page 29: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 4

DISTRIBUTION OF AFSC 491XX SKILL LEVEL MEMBERSACROSS CAREER LADDER JOBS

(PERCENT RESPONDING)

DAFSC DAFSC DAFSC DAFSC49131/51 49171 49132/52 49172

JOB GROUPS (N=1,873) (N=800) (N=393) (N=276)

COMPUTER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL (N=856) 36 24 - -

COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS PERSONNEL (N=822) 38 13 - -

FUNCTIONAL AREA MANAGERS (N=636) 11 43 3 5

COMPUTER PROGRAMMERS (N=635) 2 3 86 79

MESSAGE DISTRIBUTION CENTER PERSONNEL (N=22) 1 - - -

TECHNICAL SCHOOL PERSONNEL (N=28) 1 1 1 1

SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION PERSONNEL (N=17) - 1 - 1

RESOURCE MANAGERS (N=38) 1 2 1 1

SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS (N=33) 2 - - -

NOT GROUPED (N=364) 8 13 9 13

- Indicates less than 1 percent

23

Page 30: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

coO~ 0I.% 0 co 1,%J Ch - I Iul) '. -.-

I.L. - r .-

4Co In

La c) c'e-n 0ic rl% I I I M an r- %D ~ .r)

0.-I

-#.

w 4

C-))1' > - w w U -- u -CA O.C " = .4 U.

U. ) r39- I- C 4 c(.=

L.aaUId .rD -0IC= o

44 0-9 =, w4

ý1- (m P S.. 0080 =r

= ~ ~ ~ ~ I m imw I-U .

W- -1 06)Cie tO C) u a.)-C

LU OUV) 0-4 2c I-U).- 4A -C.C 1 .3 La. La. La -L I-1661 1- " UJ W) LL. 2c I.-0~ u .m01

In I= ac uQ#- ) -iC w L..J MI U CLm r Lai U cr w 1.16 1616 La 2cU CD w .0

0m = 0L 0c( I-- vi~ V) 4Aoc. =UC LL. =4 0. C

(. c r L. ( C L. CM t c 4A cot4.10 aF-00-=C:cc c 2 C C= ==2 =3 2C 2C MC3 0a 2C. 2C. 2C U,

MC Ca P-4 40 P- c 1-4 'CD U) -4Qa 1-4.. 0 -4 1- -.0-..4~ = XC -Z .. JLa 1-i. ;R S.4C Zci Z 0 z

9-4 Wa.- Lai.JL LaJ1 (3 0D. A

V) 'LUIC 01-=Ml wZ1-m =W 0. c 1-C 09.

CD~~ I-- CL CL C. C L L C L 0C . a

034Cc 0a w1 LL. -U COia rJ U J Q CL U. C4'x1

LU.J ~(3LL ~ 0 C24~ h

Page 31: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 6

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS OF DAFSC 49131/51 PERSONNEL

PERCENTMEMBERSPERFORMING

TASKS (N-1,873)

Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 68

F169 NOTIFY AFFECTED PERSONNEL, SUCH AS SUPERVISORS OR REMOTEUSERS, OF MACHINE FAILURES OR DOWNTIME 62

F178 POWER UP OR POWER DOWN COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMSEQUIPMENT 61

F167 MOUNT OR DISMOUNT MAGNETIC MEDIA 59

E94 DISTRIBUTE MESSAGES OR OUTPUT PRODUCTS 56

E90 CHECK OPERATIONAL STATUS OF EQUIPMENT 55

E117 RESPOND TO INQUIRIES FROM CUSTOMERS, SUCH AS COMPUTERJOB OR MESSAGE STATUS 55

ElO MAKE ENTIRES ON SHIFT SUPERVISOR LOGS 53F188 RESPOND TO SYSTEM REQUESTS 51

F187 REQUEST SYSTEM INFORMATION VIA CONSOLE 50

Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVEUNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 50

Q529 AUTHORIZE OR DENY ACCESS TO RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLED AREASOR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 49

F174 PERFORM OPERATOR MAINTENANCE ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTERSYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 48

Ells PREPARE UNCLASSIFIED MEDIA FOR MAIL, DELIVERY ORDISTRIBUTION 47

F143 ENTER DATA VIA CONSOLE 45

F153 ISOLATE CAUSES OF MACHINE STOPS OR MALFUNCTIONS 45

F177 PERFORM RECOVERY PROCEDURES ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTERSYSTEMS 44

1223 ANNOTATE TIME OF TRANSMISSION OR RECEIPT ON MESSAGES 43

1240 PREPARE SERVICE MESSAGES 43

1229 FOLLOW UP SERVICE MESSAGES 42

25

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -"-- .•- -

Page 32: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 7

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS OF DAFSC 49171 PERSONNEL

PERCENTMEMBERSPERFORMING

TASKS (N=800)

Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 68

B22 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY-RELATEDPROBLEMS 68

C56 PREPARE APR 66

A4 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 65B36 SUPERVISE 5-LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

OPERATOR PERSONNEL (AFSC 49151) 57

A6 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 56

B32 INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, OR PROCEDURES FORSUBORDINATES 56

A8 ESTABLISH ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES, OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS(00,) OR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 53

E90 CHECK OPERATIONAL STATUS OF EQUIPMENT 52

D64 CONDUCT OJT 52

A20 SCHEDULE LEAVES OR PASSES 51

C59 WRITE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AWARDS OR DECORATIONS 50

E93 COORDINATE WITH SUBSCRIBERS OR CUSTOMERS ON MATTERSSUCH AS OPERATIONAL OR PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS 48

D68 DEMONSTRATE HOW TO LOCATE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 48

C529 AUTHORIZE OR DENY ACCESS TO RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLEDAREAS OR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 47

C43 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 47

F169 NOTIFY AFFECTED PERSONNEL, SUCH AS SUPERVISORS OR REMOTEUSERS, OF MACHINE FAILURES OR DOWNTIME 46

Q568 STORE OR SAFEGUARD CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 46

D81 MAINTAIN TRAINING RECORDS, CHARTS, OR GRAPHS 46

Q562 REPORT SECURITY VIOLATIONS 46

26

'4i

Page 33: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

performed tasks. A large percentage (24) of 7-skill level airmen also per-formed the Computer Operations job, while the Communications Operations jobaccounted for 13 percent of the 7-skill level personnel. Tasks showing thedifferences between 3- and 5-skill level personnel and 7-skill level personnelare shown in Table 8.

DAFSC 49132/52. The 393 members in this group comprised 59 percent of theAFSC 491XZ sample. Ninety-three percent of their time is spent performingtechnical tasks, such as debugging computer programs, desk checking programs,and coding computer programs in high-level compiler languages. Forty-fivepercent of their job time is spent in Duty 0, PERFORMING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT,IMPLEMENTATION, AND MAINTENANCE. Eighty-six percent of this group is includedin the Computer Programmer cluster. This emphasizes the homogeneous nature ofthe career ladder. Representative tasks performed by these 3- and 5-skilllevel personnel are shown in Table 9.

DAFSC 49172. The jobs of the 276 7-skill level personnel are very similar tothat performed by the 3- and 5-skill level personnel. The difference occursin the scope of the job, as 7-skill level personnel have an increase in thesupervisory and higher level technical tasks they perform. Seven-skill levelpersonnel perform 85 tasks, compared to only 59 tasks performed by 3- and5-skill level personnel. Overall, 7-skill level personnel still perform avery technical job, spending only 16 percent of their job time performingtasks within the supervisory, managerial, and training duties. This rela-tively low amount of time spent in supervisory type activities is furtheremphasized by the fact that only 5 percent of the 7-skill level personnel arefound in the Functional Area Managers cluster (see Table 4). Similar to 3-and 5-skill level personnel, 79 percent of these personnel are included in theComputer Programmer cluster. Representative tasks performed by 49172 airmenare found in Table 10. Tasks which differentiate between 3- and 5-skill levelpersonnel and 7-skill level personnel are found in Table 11.

DAFSC 49199 and CEM Code 49100. One hundred and ten DAFSC 49199/00 personnelresponded to this survey. This amounts to 3 percent of the total survey sam-ple. These personnel spend a substantial amount of time performing super-visory and managerial tasks such as interpreting policies and directives,determining requirements for personnel and equipment, and establishing per-formance standards for subordinates. This group's supervisory orientation isevident by the large amount of job time (60 percent) spent in the supervisory,managerial, and training duties, and is reflected again by the representativetasks for this group displayed in Table 12. While these senior-level person-nel may perform a few higher level technical tasks, the focus of their job isclearly supervisory in nature.

As discussed in the skill-level descriptions, both career ladders displaya relatively technical orientation. Career ladder progression is apparent inboth career ladders, as 7-skill level personnel in both career ladders showincreases in the supervisory and managerial duties performed. The progressionis less evident in the AFSC 491X2 career ladder, however, as DAFSC 49172airmen still perform a very technical job.

27

Page 34: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 8

EXAMPLES OF TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEENDAFSC 49131/51 PERSONNEL AND DAFSC 49171 PERSONNEL

(PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING)

DAFSC DAFSC49131/51 49171

JOB GROUPS (N-1,873) (N=800) DIFFERENCE

E94 DISTRIBUTE MESSAGES OR OUTPUT PRODUCTS 56 32 +241223 ANNOTATE TIME OF TRANSMISSION OR RECEIPT

ON MESSAGES 43 21 +22

F167 MOUNT OR DISMOUNT MAGNETIC MEDIA 59 37 +22

F178 POWER UP OR POWER DOWN COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 61 40 +21

1229 FOLLOW UP SERVICE MESSAGES 42 21 +21

F190 SET OR RESET COMPUTER TIME CLOCKS 49 28 +21

1240 PREPARE SERVICE MESSAGES 43 22 +21

Elil NOTIFY ADDRESSEES OR DISTRIBUTIONCENTERS OF HIGH PRECEDENCE MESSAGERECEIPT 37 17 +20

C56 PREPARE APR 23 66 -43B22 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY-

RELATED PROBLEMS 25 68 -43

A20 SCHEDULE LEAVES OR PASSES 11 51 -40

C59 WRITE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AWARDS ORDECORATIONS 11 50 -39

B32 INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, ORPROCEDURES FOR SUBORDINATES 22 56 -34

A18 PREPARE UNIT EMERGENCY PLANS 20 53 -33

C43 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCESTANDARDS 14 47 -33

C46 EVALUATE INSPECTION REPORTS OR PROCEDURES 8 40 -32

A6 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 25 56 -31

A16 PLAN WORK ASSIGNMENTS 14 45 -31

28

Page 35: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 9

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS OF DAFSC 49132/52 PERSONNEL

PERCENTMEMBERSPERFORMING

TASKS (N=393)

0400 DEBUG COMPUTER PROGRAMS 820398 COMPILE OR ASSEMBLE PROGRAMS 79

0404 DESK CHECK PROGRAMS 77

0394 CODE COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN HIGH LEVEL COMPILER LANGUAGES 75

0405 DETERMINE CAUSES OF ABNORMAL PROGRAM HALTS 74

P523 TEST COMPUTER PROGRAMS 69

0435 MAINTAIN SOURCE CODE LISTINGS .58

0473 REVIEW SOURCE CODE LISTINGS 58

0397 CODE JOB CONTROL RUN STREAMS IN JOB CONTROL LANGUAGES 52

N333 DESIGN INPUT OR OUTPUT FORMATS 50

0484 WRITE JOB CONTROL RUN STREAMS 47

E130 WORK WITH USERS IN RESOLVING COMPUTER SOFTWAREMALFUNCTIONS OR PROBLEMS 47

0399 COORDINATE WITH USERS ON NEW SYSTEM RELEASES 45

0402 DESIGN ERROR HANDLING ROUTINES 44

0483 WRITE FUNCTIONAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAMS 42

N326 ASSIST FUNCTIONAL USERS IN CONCEPTUALIZING OR DEFININGREQUIREMENTS 41

0467 REVIEW PROGRAM SPECIFICATIONS 40

0465 REVIEW INPUT OR OUTPUT FORMATS 40

0388 ANALYZE PROGRAM DUMPS 38

29

Page 36: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 10

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS OF DAFSC 49172 PERSONNEL

PERCENTMEMBERSPERFORMING

TASKS (N=276)

0400 DEBUG COMPUTER PROGRAMS 78

0405 DETERMINE CAUSES OF ABNORMAL PROGRAM HALTS 73

0398 COMPILE OR ASSEMBLE PROGRAMS 71

0394 CODE COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN HIGH LEVEL COMPILER LANGUAGES 68

0404 DE3K CHECK PROGRAMS 66

P523 TEST COMPUTER PROGRAMS 65

E130 WORK WITH USERS IN RESOLVING COMPUTER SOFTWAREMALFUNCTIONS OR PROBLEMS 59

N330 DESIGN DATA BASE SPECIFICATIONS 54

0473 REVIEW SOURCE CODE LISTINGS 53

0399 COORDINATE WITH USERS ON NEW SYSTEM RELEASES 53

N326 ASSIST FUNCTIONAL USERS IN CONCEPTUALIZING OR DEFININGREQUIREMENTS 50

D64 CONDUCT OJT 48

B40 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 47

N324 ANALYZE DATA BASE REQUIREMENTS 45

0402 DESIGN ERROR HANDLING ROUTINES 44

0397 CODE JOB CONTROL RUN STREAMS IN JOB CONTROL LANGUAGES 44

0483 WRITE FUNCTIONAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAMS 39

E93 COORDINATE WITH SUBSCRIBERS OR CUSTOMERS ON MATTERS SUCHAS OPERATIONAL OR PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS 39

0484 WRITE JOB CONTROL RUN STREAMS 38

30

Page 37: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 11

EXAMPLES OF TASKS WHICH BEST DIFFERENTIATE BETWEENDAFSC 49132/52 PERSONNEL AND DAFSC 49172 PERSONNEL

(PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING)

DAFSC DAFSC49132/52 49172

JOB GROUPS (N=393) (N=276) DIFFERENCE

0404 DESK CHECK PROGRAMS 77 66 +11

B22 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY-RELATED PROBLEMS 15 46 -31

B32 INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, ORPROCEDURES FOR SUBORDINATES 9 38 -29

A4 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 20 49 -29

D64 CONDUCT OJT 24 48 -24

A20 SCHEDULE LEAVES OR PASSES 7 31 -24

C41 ANALYZE WORKLOAD REQUIREMENTS 9 31 -22

C43 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCESTANDARDS 9 30 -21

D78 EVALUATE OJT TRAINEES 9 30 -21

N340 DETERMINE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

INPUT REQUIREMENTS 19 36 -17

0410 DEVELOP DATA BASE RECOVERY PROCEDURES 14 29 -15

N353 DEVELOP SOFTWARE IMPLEMENTATION ORCONVERSION PLANS 16 31 -15

N342 DETERMINE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMSOUTPUT REQUIREMENTS 20 34 -14

P494 DETERMINE IMPACT OF OPERATING SYSTEMS ERRORS 8 22 -14

31

Page 38: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 12

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS OF DAFSC 49199/49100 PERSONNEL

PERCENTMEMBERSPERFORMING

TASKS (N=110)

B22 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY-RELATED

PROBLEMS 81

C56 PREPARE APR 74

A8 ESTABLISH ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES, OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS(00), OR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 73

B40 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 70

B32 'INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, OR PROCEDURES FORSUBORDINATES 70

C59 WRITE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AWARDS OR DECORATIONS 69

A3 DETERMINE REQUIREMENTS FOR SPACE, PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENTOR SUPPLIES 65

A20 SCHEDULE LEAVES OR PASSES 65

C60 WRITE STAFF STUDIES, SURVEYS, OR SPECIAL REPORTS 64

A4 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 63

B31 INITIATE PERSONNEL ACTION REQUESTS 62

Al ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO DUTY POSITIONS 62

C43 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 61

A6 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 61

A2 ASSIGN SPONSORS FOR NEWLY ASSIGNED PERSONNEL 61

C45 EVALUATE INDIVIDUALS FOR PROMOTION, DEMOTION ORRECLASSIFICATION 60

All PLAN BRIEFINGS 58

A9 ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SUBORDINATES 58

A17 PREPARE JOB DESCRIPTIONS 58

838 SUPERVISE 7-LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMSOPERATION PERSONNEL (AFSC 49171) 56

32

Page 39: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

AFR 39-1 SPECIALTY DESCRIPTIONS FOR AFSCs 491X1/X2

Occupational survey data are also used to examine classification issues.By comparing those jobs performed in a career ladder to the specialty descrip-tions, judgments can be made about the descriptions' completeness and accu-racy.

AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions are intended to give a very broaddescription of the responsibilities held by the various skill levels within acareer ladder. Two job descriptions were applicable to AFSC 491Xl (onedescription for DAFSCs 49111, 49131, and 49151 and one description for DAFSC49171), while two job descriptions were also applicable to AFSC 491X2 (onedescription for DAFSCs 49112, 49132, and 49152 and one description for DAFSC49172). There was also one job description for DAFSC 49199 and CEM Code 49100skill levels. All job descriptions were dated 1 February 1988.

The tasks and duties contained in the job descriptions were well sup-ported by the results of this occupational survey. The AFSC 491X1 jobdescriptions made no reference to the mobility functions performed by a smallpercentage of personnel in the career ladder; however, this was corrected withthe proposed addition of this function at a Utilization and Training Workshop(U&TW) held at Keesler AFB MS in May 1988. With this exception, the tasks andduties contained in all the job descriptions were well supported by theresults of this survey. This fact was validated by members of the previouslymentioned U&TW.

Although the job descriptions accurately reflected the duties and tasksbeing accomplished at the various skill levels for both career ladders, mem-bers at the previously mentioned U&TW made several proposed changes to eachjob description centering on updating career ladder terminology. In addition,all references in the AFSC 491XI job descriptions relating to pre-merger AFSCterminology were replaced with current AFSC 491X1 terminology. In no case wasthe content of the job descriptions affected.

ANALYSIS OF CONUS VERSUS OVERSEAS GROUPS

A comparison was made of the various tasks performed and background datafor DAFSC 49151 and 49152 respondents assigned within the CONUS versus thoseassigned to overseas locations.

DAFSC 49151. Very few differences could be detected In the overall mission ofDAXFCr49157 personnel in regard to their CONUS/OS location. Overseas person-nel did tend to have higher percent members performing tasks dealing with mes-sage processing, such as retrieving messages manually, preparing servicemessages, and assigning routing indicators. Otherwise, CONUS and overseaspersonnel perform the same job. Table 13 displays the slightly increased mes-sage processing orientation of overseas personnel.

33

Page 40: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 13

TASKS WHICH DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN DAFSC 49151CONUS AND OVERSEAS GROUPS

(PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING)

OVERSEAS CONUSTASKS (N=514) (N=1,014) DIFFERENCE

1247 STAMP MESSAGES WITH SPECIAL HANDLING,

PRECEDENCE, OR CLASSIFICATION 50 35 +15

1229 FOLLOW UP SERVICE MESSAGES 53 38 +15

1240 PREPARE SERVICE MESSAGES 53 39 +14

Elll NOTIFY ADDRESSEES OR DISTRIBUTIONCENTERS OF HIGH PRECEDENCE MESSAGERECEIPT 46 33 +13

1245 RETRIEVE MESSAGES MANUALLY 29 16 +13.

1233 MAINTAIN SERVICE MESSAGE LOGS OR FILES 49 36 +13

1223 ANNOTATE TIME OF TRANSMISSION OR RECEIPTON MESSAGES 52 40 +12

E125 TEST PERFORMANCE OF CRYPTOGRAPHICEQUIPMENT IN LOCAL POSITION 31 19 +12

1246 SEPARATE INCOMING MESSAGES FORDISTRIBUTION OR COMMERCIAL REFILE 38 27 +11

Q542 INVENTORY CLASSIFIED OR COMMUNICATIONSSECURITY (COMSEC) MATERIALS 50 40 +10

1224 ASSIGN ROUTING INDICATORS 46 36 +10

34

Page 41: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

DAFSC 49152. As expected, the jobs performed by CONUS and overseas personnelwere very similar; however, some minor differences were noted. CONUS person-nel had higher percent members performing on tasks dealing with softwaredevelopment, implementation, and maintenance. Examples of such tasks include:coding computer programs in high-level compiler languages, writing utilityprograms, writing functional applications programs, and writing database pro-grams. Overseas personnel placed more emphasis on security-related tasks suchas storing or safeguarding classified material, reporting security violations,and performing courier functions. Table 14 shows those tasks which best dif-ferentiate between between DAFSC 49152 CONUS and overseas groups.

AFSC 491XI/X2 TRAINING ANALYSIS

Information gathered from occupational survey data is also used to assistin the development or evaluation of formal training programs or training docu-ments such as the Specialty Training Standard (STS) and Plan of Instruction(POI). A particularly important factor which may be used for this purpose isthe percentage of an appropriate group, such as first-enlistment (1-48 monthsTAFMS) personnel, performing tasks. In addition, the secondary task factorsof training emphasis or task difficulty ratings (as explained in the TaskFactor Administration section) provide useful information.

Technical school personnel from both career ladders have matched techni-cal job inventory tasks to appropriate STS or POI sections to facilitate useof occupational survey data to evaluate the relevance and completeness ofthese documents. Computer listings which display the STS or POI with matchedtasks and survey data are used in the analysis to show which sections of theSTS or POI are most relevant to the career ladder. They may also be used toshow which tasks not matched to these documents may need to be included due tothe extent to which they are performed in the career ladder and their impor-tance to training. To aid in any further detailed review of training docu-ments, these computer displays have been forwarded to the technical school.In addition to a summary of that information, this section contains an analy-sis of the first-enlistment personnel. Figure 2 shows the distribution ofAFSC 491X1 first-enlistment personnel across the jobs discussed in theSPECIALTY JOBS section of this report. Figure 3 shows the distribution ofAFSC 491X2 first-enlistment personnel across the jobs in the Computer Pro-grammer cluster also discussed in the SPECIALTY JOBS section.

Training Emphasis and Task Difficulty Data

The objective of collecting TE and TD ratings is to identify tasks interms of importance for first-term training and in terms of difficulty. Theselists of inventory tasks are included in both the Analysis and TrainingExtracts, with TE and TD ratings accompanying each inventory task displayed inthe Training Extract. (For a more detailed explanation of both types ofratings, see Task Factor Administration in the SURVEY METHODOLOGY section.)Tasks performed by moderate to high percentages of personnel may warrant

35

Page 42: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 14

TASKS WHICH DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN DAFSC 49152CONUS AND OVERSEAS GROUPS

(PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING)

OVERSEAS CONUSTASKS (N=56) (N=280) DIFFERENCE

0394 CODE COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN HIGH LEVEL

COMPILER LANGUAGES 77 54 +23

P523 TEST COMPUTER PROGRAMS 74 55 +19

0488 WRITE UTILITY PROGRAMS 35 18 +17

P509 PREPARE PROGRAM TEST SPECIFICATIONS ORINSTRUCTIONS 23 7 +16

0398 COMPILE OR ASSEMBLE PROGRAMS 81 66 +15

0479 WRITE DATA BASE PROGRAMS 26 13 +13

0417 DEVELOP SOFTWARE PROTOTYPES 18 5 +13

Q568 STORE OR SAFEGUARD CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 18 45 -27

Q548 MARK OR STAMP SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED ORCLASSIFIED INFORMATION, OTHER THAN MESSAGES 19 45 -26

Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR

SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 19 41 -22

Q562 REPORT SECURITY VIOLATIONS 19 38 -19

Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 28 45 -17

Q567 SIGN RECEIPTS FOR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 11 27 -16

Q551 PERFORM COURIER FUNCTIONS 6 21 -15

36

Page 43: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

V))

a-~

M M1

Cf) :DLU C.9,

I-L

zCF)q-I

L-Iv

0)

F-:

(/) 0

37

Page 44: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

LUJ

-LJ

U,Zm

CLw

q-

C-V)

(no

cnJ

OV)

F:'38

Page 45: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

resident technical training. TE and TO ratings, composed of the opinions ofexperienced personnel in each career ladder, are secondary factors that mayassist training developers in deciding which tasks should be emphasized forentry-level training. Those tasks receiving high task factor ratings, butperformed by low percentages of first-enlistment personnel, may be moreappropriately planned for OJT programs within the career ladder. Low taskfactor ratings may highlight tasks best left out of training for new person-nel, but this decision must be weighed against percentages of personnel per-forming the tasks and other task considerations. Examples of tasks rated highin TE and TD for AFSC 491XI personnel are shown in Tables 15 and 16. Examplesof tasks rated high in TE and TD for AFSC 491X2 personnel are shown in Tables17 and 18.

AFSC 491X1 Training Issues

A. AFSC 491X1 First-Enlistment Personnel. AFSC 491XV first-enlistmentpersonnel grouped almost evenly within one of two major clusters, either theCOMPUTER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL cluster, or the COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONSPERSONNEL cluster. Each cluster contained approximately 40 percent of thefirst-enlistment personnel (see Figure 2). Smaller Jobs with other first-enlistment personnel include: FUNCTIONAL AREA MANAGERS, MESSAGE DISTRIBUTIONCENTER PERSONNEL, and SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS. Ten percent of the first-enlistment personnel did not group with any job because of the uniqueness oftheir job or the manner in which they responded to our survey. As a group,first-enlistment personnel are somewhat more homogeneous than the career lad-der as a whole, with 11 tasks being performed by 50 percent or more members.As shown by Table 19, most of the common functions performed by this groupdeal with communications-computer systems operator functions, while securityand general communuications-computer systems functions were also emphasized.Examples of tasks performed by AFSC 491X1 first-enlistment personnel are shownin Table 20.

B. AFSC 491X1 Specialty Training Standard (STS). An STS is intended toprovide comprehensive coverage of tasks performed by career ladder personnel.To assess the effectiveness of the November 1987 AFSC 491X1 STS, survey datawere compared to STS elements. Sections containing managerial, general infor-mation, or knowledge areas were not reviewed. In addition to examining howwell survey data supported STS items, also explored were the additional areaswhich might need to be included in the STS, based on survey findings. Subse-quent to the initial review of this STS, the STS was modified by members ofthe previously mentioned May 1988 Utilization and Training Workshop at KeeslerAFB MS. Therefore, the following analysis will deal only with the new STS.During the U&TW, members determined which elements needed to be trained at the3-level course. For eight of these elements, the data for the criterion group(1-48 months TAFMS) indicated that course training did not appear warranted.Members Justified training of these elements, based on the critical nature ofthe elements and the adverse consequences of inadequate performance. Examplesof these elements are shown in Table 21.

39

Page 46: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

4-

CA-I

0-4 ~ 04 - - G r-l o P% % 0 U ,) q~ * l

8-4Z = 0 %;tou u U; U U; Vfl U; LA Lc U U;

ixLU -

V) LL.

LU 9z -Zj

-A co r. V-n r ) D qt%

LOU

I--~ ( C ) ~ -V0)9 P~-4 t

AC >- t

... (.D 0- J

0Oc La C -

3w n ex I.CVL -V)I P-42 cCi i

LLJL CO.ý L) () C2c 0L U F- '4 LA O Ca w n. V)J '-3 09-L P-4 ý CD

KA LUi U. 200I- E -LL. 04 CCI " CD P0n V At

2c 4fl (A QLc= U . )a A .

I-S 0 LUS = K~ V0 u'. - 0= .L L 1- ! AS wui - C8CL. or ac. '-ecu - - j 4'-) CEn to E

cc 0 cc (A) 0 A V) QL I-tf C) LULUQ -~ En 0- LU. C

I.- V) 0 D L) En 3 % M a

ad( C L :11 O0c V)( ClU .%- I 2cC.0 C3 (A C3J V.J OW(.

in CD zi U CD~ L 0 CD I-w ZI-ccCL = Lw 09 w C. 1%=d

L u LU. V) w = LUW ~ L. Lay l. i 0 9 >-D I-- CD L) L I -I- Fw ~ ~ CL LIa w 1wt 2 L 0V LiU -Z

01 C.) 0) ui dc~n cL S. C

K n LU r- LU C - wlU. I .C. r wI C L6 ) cy LA- N.J

0040 0 -L I

Page 47: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 16

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS RATED HIGHEST IN TASK DIFFICULTYFOR AFSC 491X1

TDTASKS RATINGF141 DEVELOP MICROFILM 7.20

E088 ANALYZE COMPUTER PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT DATA 7.06

F154 ISOLATE PROBLEMS ON PRODUCTION RUNS 6.95

F131 ALIGN COMPUTER OUTPUT MICROFILM (COM) CAMERAS 6.88

E089 ANALYZE OR EVALUATE STATISTICAL DATA 6.86

E130 WORK WITH CUSTOMERS IN RESOLVING COMPUTER SOFTWAREMALFUNCTIONS OR PROBLEMS 6.74

M301 COMPILE TELEPHONE DIRECTORIES 6.70

G209 RESIZE DATA BASE AREA 6.61

F734 CHANGE INTERNAL COMPONENTS OF MICROCOMPUTERS 6.61

F153 ISOLATE CAUSES OF MACHINE STOPS OR MALFUNCTIONS 6.60

F152 INTERROGATE MEMORY LOCATION VIA CONSOLES 6.51

E87 ANALYZE CIRCUIT, COMMUNICATION LINE, OR EQUIPMENTOUTAGE REPORTS 6.45

G195 ALIGN FILES ON DISC 6.38

41

Page 48: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

hie ~ La * W % C'-j C-i CJl U 0 0- IM %C ~OC94 .

1= 6O %0 U-1 %C Lg0 U; Un'0 n ;

UP .I c0 1) M~ mV - W) ON M0 0 0 r-. M

2c I-&J r. rý P... P.. P. ko U) Sn Sn LO Sn LO

z

LL.93. ..-1

CA UJI n P.. ~ A ý 00 CDP-.00'.009%CV cc '- P% oP o k r v U

uLJ u.I 11Iti- Z -nZ

-iy K #D

in 4DK W q~ R

LJJIu.

M C I-N

LLI-

0D to

.. J CD C ~CCie 0)

LJ CID cc Go

LiiLL~J

CL . 10K -n I--V L.1

;c CC. ='CLJ -4 k

w CD CD f^

4A =cc w a.L CL. in - au

LI- ID inW C0 C-I ) LI L.. CiI- (D 9~ 0L Cj cC

cc CIO i0 cm zixi in cccc CD -i

(i cinc I-- c = CMO4

S. CL ci C 00C ie LI

ca=V) I- -. - (A~~L ~CcL. Ra C. 3I-cz =ccLJ.i COV

L40)I O I 00 at a00CjP % t%

I-- n C )0 CDCLCD ccLi CDLc

424

Page 49: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 18

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS RATED HIGHEST IN TASK DIFFICULTYFOR AFSC 491X2

TDTASKS RATING*

0389 ANALYZE SYSTEM DUMPS 7.59

0393 CODE COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN ASSEMBLY LANGUAGES 7.38

0438 MODIFY SOFTWARE USING MACHINE CODE 7.20

0388 ANALYZE PROGRAM DUMPS 7.11

0487 WRITE OPERATING SYSTEM PROGRAMS 7.03

N329 DESIGN COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS INTERFACE ORINTEGRATION REQUIREMENTS 6.87

N337 DESIGN REMOTE TERMINAL NETWORKS 6.75

0423 EVALUATE CONTRACT CHANGE PACKAGES 6.73

0482 WRITE DATA COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAMS 6.71

N324 ANALYZE DATA BASE REQUIREMENTS 6.69

N330 DESIGN DATA BASE SPECIFICATIONS 6.69

N351 DEVELOP MODELS TO SIMULATE FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS 6.66

N335 DESIGN OPERATING SYSTEMS INTERFACE OR INTEGRATIONREQUIREMENTS 6.65

* Average TD rating = 5.00, Standard Deviation = 1.00

43

Page 50: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 19

PERCENT TIME SPENT ON DUTIES BY 491X1 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL(1-48 MONTHS TAFMS)

PERCENTDUTIES TIME SPENT

A ORGANIZING AND PLANNING 2B DIRECTING AND IMPLEMENTING 1

C INSPECTING AND EVALUATING 1

D TRAINING 2E PERFORMING GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER

SYSTEMS FUNCTIONS 17F PERFORMING COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

OPERATOR FUNCTIONS 29

G PERFORMING PRODUCTION CONTROL OR SYSTEMMONITOR FUNCTIONS 3

H PERFORMING GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS FUNCTIONS 1

I PROCESSING MESSAGES 11J PERFORMING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC ANALYSES

FUNCTIONS 2

K PERFORMING MAGNETIC MEDIA LIBRARY FUNCTIONS 5L PERFORMING COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER MOBILITY

FUNCTIONS 1

M OPERATING NON-MOBILE TELEPHONE SWITCHBOARDS 3

N PERFORMING SOFTWARE PLANNING AND DESIGN

0 PERFORMING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION,AND MAINTENANCE 2

P PERFORMING SOFTWARE TESTING, QUALITY ASSURANCE,AND CONFIGURATION MGT FUNCTIONS

Q MAINTAINING SECURITY 17

R PERFORMING SUPPLY OR CONTRACTING FUNCTIONS 2

- Denotes less than 1 percentNote: Columns may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding

44

Page 51: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 20

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY AFSC 491X1 FIRST ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL(1-48 MONTHS TAFMS)

PERCENTMEMBERSPERFORMING

TASKS (N=967)

F169 NOTIFY AFFECTED PERSONNEL, SUCH AS SUPERVISORS OR REMOTE USERS,OF MACHINE FAILURES OR DOWNTIME 66

Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 65

F178 POWER UP OR DOWN COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 65F167 MOUNT OR DISMOUNT MAGNETIC MEDIA 65E094 DISTRIBUTE MESSAGES OR OUTPUT PRODUCTS 60E117 RESPOND TO INQUIRIES FROM CUSTOMERS, SUCH AS COMPUTER JOB OR

MESSAGE STATUS 60F188 RESPOND TO SYSTEM REQUESTS 56E090 CHECK OPERATIONAL STATUS OF EQUIPMENT 55F187 REQUEST SYSTEM INFORMATION VIA CONSOLE 53F190 SET OR RESET COMPUTER TIME CLOCKS 53E115 PREPARE UNCLASSIFIED MEDIA FOR MAIL, DELIVERY, OR DISTRIBUTION 50EllO MAKE ENTRIES ON SHIFT SUPERVISOR LOGS 49F174 PERFORM OPERATOR MAINTENANCE ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

OR EQUIPMENT 49Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE

UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 49F143 ENTER DATA VIA CONSOLE 48F177 PERFORM RECOVERY PROCEDURES ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS 48Q570 WITNESS DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 47Q529 AUTHORIZE OR DENY ACCESS TO RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLED AREAS OR

CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 47Q537 DISTRIBUTE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 461223 ANNOTATE TIME OF TRANSMISSION OR RECEIPT ON MESSAGES 45Q568 STORE OR SAFEGUARD CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 44F153 ISOLATE CAUSES OF MACHINE STOPS OR MALFUNCTIONS 441240 PREPARE SERVICE MESSAGES 431229 FOLLOW UP SERVICE MESSAGES 411247 STAMP MESSAGES WITH SPECIAL HANDLING, PRECEDENCE, OR

CLASSIFICATION 41

45

Page 52: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

I.-I. w .)ei )

Loa

40 ulEn C40 LDOL- LL. I C- Ll

- I

Lncc

La to en en

I'- -w

CL.

CCD0-i

La

w .-

I-.-.. Li

En LaVI I- C

zO

0~4 A

0 :I- w -C- a.

La CDLaa

4A tA -C3-vu- 0 I. En L

Z 0La to I. wD-i -C =- V

L. a. En C, a. La C

w 1cU W) 0 . L. SiI.

o. Uw ui w 0 0

La 0. )1- IiC a.- M.CLvi

0L I -CL. '5z4A .i- Lai La

CZ En- S- .n LIa 0~4La Go~ (n n LL. cm Li E

Lei q- 4A I.L-ZLa LaZ

I---'5Ena 40a Ll

Page 53: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

Altogether, 19 elements from the new STS were considered below the 3-skill level proficiency coding indicated by survey data. These elements werealso reviewed by members of the U&TW, and it was determined it was beyond thescope of the technical school to train above the proficiency level presentlytaught. Examples of these elements appear in Table 22.

An additional area of analysis involves examining tasks not matched toany STS element. Unreferenced tasks performed by at least 20 percent of agroup in the career Tadder should be considered for inclusion in the STS.Additionally, tasks with high TE or TO ratings should be examined for possibleSTS inclusion. Overall, the STS had very extensive coverage as only two tech-nical tasks were not referenced to the STS. These tasks are shown in Table23. Overall, occupational survey data was used to modify 3-skill level pro-ficiency coding for 22 STS elements.

C. AFSC 49131 Plan of Instruction (POI). Based on the assistance fromtechnical school subject-matter experts in matching inventory tasks to theE3ABR49131 000 POI, dated 1 June 1987, a computer printout was then generatedto display the results of the matching for use in this analysis and for adetailed review of training. A Plan of Instruction generally contains twotypes of objectives: knowledge objectives and performance objectives. Sincetask statements are relevant to performance objectives, rather than knowledgeobjectives, only performance objectives are reviewed in this analysis.

Guidelines outlined in ATCR 52-22 state a POI objective is supported fortraining if 30 percent or more of all first-job (1-24 months TAFMS) or first-enlistment (1-48 months TAFMS) personnel perform related tasks. A review oftasks matched to the POI reveals that most POI blocks and units of instructionare well supported by survey data, based on percentages of first-term person-nel performing tasks or high TE or TD ratings. There are four units ofinstruction, however, which contain objectives that are not well supported bysurvey data and require further evaluation by training personnel. These fourunits of instruction are shown in Table 24.

Additionally, some tasks with high TE ratings, sufficiently high TDratings, and 30 percent or more first-job or first-enlistment personnel per-forming were not matched to any POI blocks of instructions. This combinationof factors indicated formal training may be required and resident technicaltraining could be supported. Table 25 shows examples of these tasks.

AFSC 491X2 Training Issues

A. AFSC 491X2 First-Enlistment Personnel. AFSC 491X2 first-enlistmentpersonnel grouped almost entirely with the COMPUTER PROGRAMMERS cluster.Sixty-five percent of these first-enlistment personnel grouped into theAPPLICATIONS PROGRAMMERS job within the cluster. Other jobs containing smallnumbers of first-enlistment personnel include PROGRAMMER ANALYSTS and ASSEMBLYLANGUAGE PROGRAMMERS. These airmen spend one-half of their time on softwaredevelopment, implementation, and maintenance, and 14 percent of their time on

47

Page 54: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

ca CN(0

CA1 ED %D -i V) Nn

z

a% In p, c

ae Ia.. - C. a qn -W4

En - 0 -I

I.- -- to %D (0n P% 0 0hi 2r Ch D 4 (0 --I %o W 4

W.1 4.) En

C. 0

0n I.. N ~@ (0t0 in acE 4' E

X Li

0 3c

Lai -J 0 I L A c Ihi (Dc -. A.J 0 Q

- wh ccI -I.- CL1

C) C4

hiA

w 4

Lai -C4

En C13 I.- ES 41VCA u I--h 'A E

En LI I- cmU. hi CcKQ - I-

I-- & 9 C. 0

-LI -j CC . hi V) I.- Q EuEn .(J0 . A =CL. to

K hi LL. En ca =. En a0&En 0 cc 4A~ < Li 00 hi EnP 0L

La ac ac V) 0j u Z- z w0 1 LA Wi CD cc w I.-

)i c q- 0x CL 0 caj En VE 3- w. = ... Lhi" r En Laic

Cl 0 - i f- >-En 0 to LL. - = x ouZ. - En 4A LL L.En I- &AV)-

LL cenh ca = nn- v- i EnM -hi 9- 0 LL ac cifO -LCL. I.- - I.- 0 c W 0 i ~ :1. -CC f^ CA U-J 2C W 2C a i

= L .-. w hi C . i hi W

M hi f-) WO L-a~i )- :M.hi En) I.- -C I.- CI.- c O- 0 1-- aaL. La. 0 4. OFK ME I-L..J En Cl. w Imhi 0ý 426 CD u 0 W Wnh hi

i En -i .1 hiC 4n 03. I.- C. 014JCA Ok - -C QE

K 0 v t-- CD0% E) hi 0 4I.- M. %* = (n Csi hi RP = m u

1- hi En 0Gon E 1 h I

1- E. 4u

E) -l -n %C4

Page 55: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 23

TECHNICAL TASKS PERFORMED BY 20 PERCENTOR MORE 491XI GROUP MEMBERS AND NOT REFERENCED TO THE STS

PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING

IST 1STJOB ENL 5-LVL 7-LVL TNG

TASKS (N=421) (N=967) (N=1,585) (N=800) EMP

F161 MAKE ENTRIES ON WORK OR RUN REQUESTS,SUCH AS INITIALS, REMARKS, OR PANELREADINGS 24 25 21 14 3.02

1245 RETRIEVE MESSAGES MANUALLY 17 20 21 9 3.02

* Mean TE rating is 1.70 and Standard Deviation is 1.43 (High TE = 3.13)

49

Page 56: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

'CDe

I-- cm w

U Q)

s-i

C- C' 4

Ch =aLU u

'C I--u

3c~ ". w A-=J M 40 u

ui 3c I-

='J I- Lj-j zU. U)

U. P"I I-- R +&LU) 'C dc .5-MC'C m LU co V) V

o w% 0.- 0.. 0I

(.D LI.) I--Iui U) 0ca c

L< = .-4 U)P- w I 4

dl om -J no -J ZLLI-tn "(A-- m ) m U 0 8

C26 'C cc -i LUL

'Cvt I- R) I-I- U) mi. Q 0"

U) r -U 04'w - - ' Z- L C ''C- ,L

U)~J LU ~ U )ILU ~ 50l'

Page 57: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

LL CJ CA %0 J (V r.

C4 U;li'. U4 U; U Lc; V

(Vi ql 0; U; 0;

LL.

Ia.A. 0 0ý Ch Ot c0

Laj

CL .) It

a- z ý

LL. LaI

I--La)

0:

"i W La

-.1 a CD

L&. 0 4c V)i

La IX m, C

CJ -

O.1U

La4 La ix co L- t- 40

CA La 09 .-

COP Q (A. ~ a. P Vu1 a- IX V E

WO M. La <- Z

C3. La -j La U.1

La 0 2c 0. '.

La (n0 .W

oc tU ) U a5U9 U.La1

a '. 0 A u CL 4-b

I-- ua Q of CD La w U9-

~~~c IMUU~O ~ L

cz ~ I im in inV a0.1 . a V -U.11t

CA.U a. 09 Cj. 11.U LU L

l' - U. .1 U U- U. C

51

Page 58: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

software planning and design. Time spent across duties for first-enlistmentpersonnel are shown in Table 26. Tasks which are representative of AFSC 491X2first-enlistment personnel are shown in Table 27.

B. AFSC 491X2 Specialty Training Standard (STS). To assess the effec-tiveness of the 491XZ S5S, dated August 1985, survey data were matched to STSelements. Once again, elements containing managerial, general information, orknowledge areas were not reviewed. Since the 491X2 STS was also modified atthe previously mentioned U&TW, the following analysis will deal only with thenew STS. As in the case with the 49lX1 STS, members of the U&TW determinedwhich elements needed to be trained at the 3-level course. For two of theseelements, the data for the criterion group (1-48 months TAFMS) indicated thatcourse training did not appear warranted. Members justified training of theseelements based on the critical nature of the elements and the adverse conse-quences of inadequate performance. These elements are shown in Table 28.

Altogether, 5 elements from the new STS were considered below the 3-skilllevel proficiency coding indicated by survey data. These elements were alsoreviewed by members of the U&TW, and it was determined it was beyond the scopeof the technical school to train above the proficiency level presently taught.Examples of these elements appear in Table 29.

As with the AFSC 491X1 STS, tasks with greater than 20 percent membersperforming or with high TE or TD should be considered for inclusion in theSTS. There were a number of tasks which met this criteria not referenced tothe STS. Examples of these tasks appear in Table 30. These tasks should bereviewed by training personnel and functional managers for possible inclusionin the STS.

C. AFSC 49132 Plan of Instruction (POI). As in the case with the 491X1POI, technical school subject-matter experts provided a match of inventorytasks to POI E3ABR49132 000, dated 16 September 1985. Computer printouts werethen generated to display the results of the matching for use in this analysisand for a detailed review of training. Once again, only performance objec-tives are reviewed in this analysis.

Based on the guidelines outlined in ATCR 52-22, a review of tasks matchedto the POI reveals several POI objectives which were not supported by surveydata. Examples of these POI objectives appear in Table 31. These blocksshould be reviewed by training personnel to determine the necessity of con-tinued training of those blocks.

In addition, some tasks with high TE ratings, sufficiently high TD rat-ings, and 30 percent or more first-job or first-enlistment personnel perform-ing were not matched to any POI blocks of instructions. This combination offactors indicate formal training may be required and resident technical train-ing could be supported. Table 32 shows examples of these tasks.

52

Page 59: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 26

PERCENT TIME SPENT ON DUTIES BY 491X2 FIRST-ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL(1-48 MONTHS TAFMS)

PERCENTDUTIES TIME SPENT

A ORGANIZING AND PLANNING 2

B DIRECTING AND IMPLEMENTING 1

C INSPECTING AND EVALUATING

D TRAINING 1

E PERFORMING GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS FUNCTIONS 9

F PERFORMING COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS OPERATOR FUNCTIONS 7

G PERFORMING PRODUCTION CONTROL OR SYSTEMS MONITOR FUNCTIONS *2

H PERFORMING GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS FUNCTIONS

I PROCESSING MESSAGES

J PERFORMING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC ANALYSES FUNCTIONS

K PERFORMING MAGNETIC MEDIA LIBRARY FUNCTIONS

L PERFORMING COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER MOBILITY FUNCTIONS

M OPERATING NON-MOBILE TELEPHONE SWITCHBOARDS

N PERFORMING SOFTWARE PLANNING AND DESIGN 14

0 PERFORMING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION, ANDMAINTENANCE 50

P PERFORMING SOFTWARE TESTING, QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONFIGURA-TION MANAGEMENT 6

Q MAINTAINING SECURITY 6

R PERFORMING SUPPLY OR CONTRACTING FUNCTIONS 2

- Denotes less than 1 percentNote: Columns may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding

53

Page 60: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE 27

REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY AFSC 491X2 FIRST ENLISTMENT PERSONNEL(1-48 MONTHS TAFMS)

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

D400 DEBUG COMPUTER PROGRAMS 87

0398 COMPILE OR ASSEMBLE PROGRAMS 84

0394 CODE COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN HIGH LEVEL COMPILER LANGUAGES 82

0404 DESK CHECK PROGRAMS 79

0405 DETERMINE CAUSES OF ABNORMAL PROGRAM HALTS 77

P523 TEST COMPUTER PROGRAMS .68

0473 REVIEW SOURCE CODE LISTINGS 60

N333 DESIGN INPUT OR OUTPUT FORMATS 58

0484 WRITE JOB CONTROL RUN STREAMS 50

0402 DESIGN ERROR HANDLING ROUTINES 48

0483 WRITE FUNCTIONAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAMS 47

0399 COORDINATE WITH USERS ON NEW SYSTEMS RELEASES 46

N372 PREPARE INPUT OR OUTPUT FILE SPECIFICATIONS 44

0465 REVIEW INPUT OR OUTPUT FORMATS 40

0478 WRITE APPLICATIONS PROGRAMS UTILIZING DATA MANIPULATIONLANGUAGES 40

E130 WORK WITH USERS IN RESOLVING COMPUTER SOFTWARE MALFUNCTIONSOR PROBLEMS 40

F171 PARTICIPATE WITH PROGRAMMER IN TESTING OR DEBUGGINGPROGRAMS 39

0467 REVIEW PROGRAM SPECIFICATIONS 38

N326 ASSIST FUNCTIONAL USERS IN CONCEPTUALIZING OR DEFININGREQUIREMENTS 36

0488 WRITE UTILITY PROGRAMS 36

N331 DESIGN DATA ELEMENTS OR CODES 36

0387 ANALYZE JOB STREAMS 34

54

Page 61: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

ILI~

I n r-.

CD

Cl

g.c en ani CcC'

Q. O

(A

x - - cý(J LO Go

w A

CLJ

w L& LaJ .0 .

d:C LU CC 0

knC4-

4n

ui

V).V)4

w C9

ene

I.- w CL< I.-

(V) w c

enw m

o eCL. 0a.)

Page 62: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

1'- toCA0%C

4nL-.C'Jo O oODc

0dcK

4c La qr 0 lilo a. Lo CL

LL. C%

CD La.) f=. LL en LI) -c K 1 ~

- ~ Ln

I=La I

C> qJ 0- CJ

La)

LI)

w' C)r. DI-mciI n q

*ý cn mLn C0I

ui CD L A. c.)1

U) U) Is

La ImLa U

Co I.--=

U)c ) Un LaLU 2c

0)>-U. I.-Ln 0. <

K 0 ui LU

V) La u U-IL La 0

. =a = La V) in tU- mo 0) a.U vi ) to )

Li C.-~ 1- )0 a a >V) I C31-LaJ U) COLw ) I ca I cc M

co l = 0D1I- X WqI.- M

KL q.- 0D 4.) 0 K )CDP .- WDi m. 0 u- co I- .1

I- m.L xLi mC LaKC ce0 4A-'wK CL .LJ t .- CL w- U)w

-iz. < aC. :3 CL .I.f-.- -=JL 0- ox. Ci 'kcw CD

w) arC CC ( m c

La U) -. LaLIV) ui LaI. >- 114a WiL -La I-- ix ~ o

.. U I-- LL - i )~ M) CLa U) U- CU) 0n "0 I.- La Vc Ce V)f La P Z1. C

V) CD mC im cm4- l - ' at

coo .~j m0 VC\JQ) U) 0) to C-O ý- L o vq 0Co O U) cn Uc ) DGo ~ L.I.-.

It - ) m) La w ~ ma m -it

I-U

I-- - U

V) T) '

56

Page 63: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

Ln r-i cm 414, cr O co m 'ON en

I-- cLa In C4 CC j 4 v 4' e,. c- z Cý

--

unzco

4/)

IIt

L" IAIC

% ~0 CV)V 1 CS4 m~ el-i r-r-CýLL 1.- 11 ~ ~ ~j. . - .

CIOI

m 2!:0 LLI 4A)Lii LU -

LUJ

- (nA 0D u LUJ 0 ILU0 c I-- LUJC.L Lu In) Ix 0 I

0) >- LU u~ C)0) (A4 4/). <c I

143 LD0. W-JL LU 4-

C> = (i 0o ceC) <- =a i C La

V) V) 0o C)=-4 1/) CLu0 IX m A= a 2: ) u u) L-

0- 1. V/) 4:r Cc ~ Lu Acn 0)M -X: LUI 0. 2m C-) r

cc Csi Zi 0c4Q) Lai (A toXa >< 1'-' f)M CD 0-4 CC V LUJ 4

LLr I- >- LU. = V) <c LU c 40) CA) IA C.) -. 1.

= =L cc CDL

LUJ 0 -4 4fl 041:Om =9 4) LUJ =.. .a m 00

oD V) V C) 0CD cc V)OLn c) <A 'C X: =- ~I-- 0l IL. LUJLUJ C LJ co I-.-" LU~ CC 0D o

LU Ca LUJ w 4c C- 9-c <<() 0ý x <- " i U..L ua = (A V)

of0 I= C> n l- = i acc (i LJ w -

(n 0LU -cc xCCD u <D<.9-o ' U.1 C .JZ)C

'-4 .. La. LUJ LU - Z C. LUJ to m0'c cLL. m cc AX w co --A L.-

Co -O Q >-J Cl :21. 0 LUJ <cS - J LU) LL- U. 2C 4 ...j . LLI )

- i Cl c IL- o - c 0 ClC) :. 0l -c c mZýI LAJwU wU Lu~a LU. V) :N. 0v

CL. cc 0m m .CL o LU C

4/)SU 0 r-. cr) qr mr ) c o c

V) m~ 0 co r - U) In cl-J

I- 0 LU LUt 0- 0 U L a. 0

57

Page 64: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

4A ILL-, U

ICV) co L" LCA

E*l . .C.0

It4(A (

LI-I

ELI

"I~- C-> Cvr OQ C14

LlI-

ELI) UILL

CL )U -c) w aiI-On) cox )!

CV) In a LI ZD

LL-~~U CD LIcCD cc-- 0.'-CL-i C)J U) 0) at=- -4

uLI (A >- Lai ILL-~ C>' E CI4

CD C5 - U a. C -_cc C.0 CA JI- 2: tv LO)C 0 1

0.j OW U)J I= V- CA w1uC -cc. 04 2Cr' = 0.I

LSI oU- LiC V) CAC. V) , 0o~::-O LL x I >- U) V) ce

I-- L II -. 1 O W C ) L(L) CDJ CLI 0. C-) coI-c

w V)0 00. (A C) 0 w ix-'D ccL wI =- L-- 3 wL cc

LL' 0.c . CL ILL. Imn 0 CD I--L w u

0 -D ILI 2: ox ) 0.D2!: 0o x Eo DC .cc- U.1 I-- ILL UJ 0: u 0-

s-eU) 1-- w V) V) < >- 4LLI~ wL LMU ~ I -E m- C~

-LL Co C0i lI 0 U, 0CD Z.J Doj. w.' C> 0 IX I-- l-

W- 0 U I--C -cc I- UC U-w V). auS- u I- &M.0

"co) Uc V) U. at (L) (A a. wL

..LIn C-v Cs- = Q- I-

C$. X: 3 L)a.. 9-0 0- C..) 1: S

U- LL-i LLs- U-'C La- WAwJ P-.4. _U) sI-* 0o "- I-- ->. CO 0.) w u o P- -j s-s uL. 'C an

>.CD Ixa.w w 0. mc . in a-.1 I- --I." (U) C ( . =0 m tI-- wL 0 UO U, V

U, D 0 - '06 s Cv LA

'C cn CA) kw)r- -dLI

58

Page 65: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

LU LO.1 0ý 0D (M O ci 0

a-~~ ~ Cý q'0O ~

0

LA to 0 idIr

LUICV)9- L

ac 'o M- %D 4m Ll 40 r- s

or ) toc C 14C~ C14 0iJ~ Cu

0-4 w a- n*CL.U

L~La

ta

o totnL 0ý-r

fn Z

z a

uwa ý- to

<fl . <- 0

Ij -i C-) m d

II Lo ca La La 'Le- LU re 0 "M 0

I. (D Ln :m :- c-

04 0% Cd)0 40 f-

a qC a U

(D I- K CS9

ago"

Page 66: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

JOB SATISFACTION ANALYSIS

An examination of the AFSC 491Xl job satisfaction indicators of eachexperience group provides some understanding of factors which may affect thejob performance of AFSC 49lXl personnel. Job satisfaction indicators for AFSC491Xl TAFMS groups are shown in Table 33. These are displayed alongside acomparative sample of similar career ladders surveyed in 1987. This gives arelative measure of how the job satisfaction of personnel in AFSC 491Xl com-pares with other similar career ladders in the Air Force. Job satisfactionindicators from the previous surveys of pre-merger AFSCs (511XO, 291X0, and295X0) were also analyzed to examine any possible changes in job satisfactionwhich may have been caused by the merger. Finally, job satisfaction acrossspecialty jobs were examined to determine how overall job satisfaction may beinfluenced by the specific job performed.

Five attitude questions covering job interest, perceived utilization oftalents, perceived utilization of training, sense of accomplishment from thejob, and reenlistment intentions provide indications of job satisfaction. Theanalysis comparing current and previous survey job satisfaction indicatorsdoes not include sense of accomplishment results due to a lack of data onthose questions from the previous surveys of the merged AFSCs.

Table 33 shows overall job satisfaction for the AFSC 491X1 career ladderto be fairly positive, while a comparison of AFSC 491Xl job satisfaction indi-cators to comparative data shows AFSC 491Xl personnel to have approximatelyequal to slightly lower job satisfaction indicators. An analysis of the jobsatisfaction data compared to the pre-merger AFSC job satisfaction data showsthe former 291X0 AFSC to have had somewhat low job satisfaction, while AFSC295X0 and 511XO personnel had relatively higher job satisfaction (see Table34). The current job satisfaction for AFSC 491XM personnel is a blend ofthose job satisfactions which existed among the pre-merger AFSCs. Generally,the current job satisfaction is higher than the former 291X0 AFSC, but lowerthan the former 511XO and 295X0 AFSCs. This finding indicates the merger hasnot had any meaningful impact on the career ladder's overall job satisfaction.

AFSC 491X2 personnel were also matched against the same comparative sam-ple as AFSC 491X1 personnel. This career ladder also had positive responsesto the job satisfaction indicators and generally had higher responses than thecomparative sample (see Table 35). This was especially true in the 1-48 and49-96 months TAFMS groups, who found their jobs much more interesting than thecomparative sample. Senior career ladder members displayed job satisfactionindicators approximately equal to that of the comparative sample. It isinteresting to note, while the 1-48 and 49-96 months TAFMS groups find theirjobs interesting, their career reenlistment intentions are much lower thanthat of the comparative sample. Overall, job satisfaction for this careerladder has remained stable and has even increased. This is evident by an up-ward trend in the reenlistment intentions across all three TAFMS groups sincethe last time the career ladder was surveyed. Table 36 shows job satisfactionindicators compared to the previous AFSC 511XV survey.

60

Page 67: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

Lfl

. 0-j

I.-. s-j r- .-

Sh~)O rk %O-- O

-J'"

+I Jr- IJ

co IllkoC) 0 C 'Li.. aa-uIUL~z

qr If

iL..-%0

I--I

a.~~~0 Pl -: Avi Ill -J4 U)LU r.C4eq

x- co I- ULA-.. CA LUJ A

C.07 0 4J-- a

I=0 I -Je r)L)C ' 601 qc LA t l U o ~40 IV 0 0.0i- ~~L

U)r CDfl- CC4 r_ u "a

L.1 XU LUDo a- a-

CC x61i

Page 68: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

o) c* c 0 mICA c I. %0 - rý NS Q Px 04. It

CJi 0% co cl qr %a r- o+ 040 In 0ýC~

C1.1 .(0 %0 -- r' cJ C04 V)109 s.

In %aV t r

Ch

Let LA- CJ >-Ca I0 r, In %0 ~ (Ft CDcc go ~c

La

tA ILI0 ~0 4

lU ca .0%4: ->C GD 0r 0 i a C;c 00 In I' Z amf

a- 0L

vt ccci

co I-) 0o0 i L

CC ;; m "~ ;m - L.I.- OLU fa

2c 2m

- L -1 VT M0. I I

V) '4 4.0

co~~~~~~0 V)0* ..M% ci C -GCD~~~~ ~ ~ x-gc l % n k

0~~~~~~4 III 0-- rc. I(I 1c

c-- 4,

-t 040ON11

01 to0~

I ~ %a o0 %Cc-m C~ 40 PI. CL 'a

0.In

LU~~~ U. U I

LU~ 0-I

2c LU J .. 2l LU I . CL m0 UA.1J.J I -.1Jcc c ,- 0o 5-Ia-LS I- CL =1 t. L 21! = 4-- 4.'Lo

I-~- LUI 0- to0SIA- 0 D - > 0 I.- D E 09 .1C.

co LU LUI ~-. J LUJ ). W - o C00IA LUA... .- -. ~- - 0 0lLUJ U. P. ... CD 4-J LUIn1 I

CA ccC) 0. 0i . I^ Q=z

4A ujV)- " OCD- I -62QC

Page 69: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

LL)

= N Clr) Lf a-, C LAD 41;rC

LI) r-%'C~ < r-l'- r-Cj .0rCý Cl

U- M cl

0- co

+

o'iC- > -I~ co CoC Y 00 Pý -d- C~. -i

>)

(/)0 CV U) r)on m

LC OC j c

t-) to C*-'0 P,,1C c'ir %DiL C 'i

L2.. cOmI 4)

L/) 0DC-

C0 u

Ln - .J' a

kn CAJA 4.)

c/i a)

A=0M: LIi

<i. C/)

.. j :Cc ~ O aJ 40 -

LL- m-L c O CD)

C-)A X:' WA. 0 COO CA

C-)%J V) u-~ cjL \ '. .C) .s A -Ct'0 (i1

V) CL' ..C 4

0) Li .1i c)

CO~Z 1.0~ L

cn - 0~ C (0LAL

C) cc L)>zC' 2!:r CAL WiD1D 't r C 0i.C, V) C. L

0 >

-0 UE 0'V) +ý 0 MC

C) S- uO 0

ct.z 00. -i

F-J U)- b4 (.)F- I-( aiw

cc a. Li.. I- La- Li 0- -J> -

LiCD ix LA - C-) W I -i .- cc4-C'

1-- iii CO CD I- C l.caw>, Q

o DLa.. 0iLL LL 0 J -jF-C L 'c wLi-r

C) V 0 j 1-0 0) 1-0 - ý I-- -CCo.Lw LLJ CD U-0 ca .- J ýto"

:c .3: LZ .. JAi Lii ... ui0i COl Lii V) S..

0IZ c/i imj.i -J 0..- A-) -X F-- cC -4 W 4) to

Lii Lii Lii >-.i Lii >... LA-..w LA- <F- a. = i 0 CL uV) ~ W C... C) CD 00 ( c < ) Z-. =- rE c

vi, I- -- JJ Pi v) Lii LA -1 w-( 0i~.-~JJ C -A

=I C4V) U Ui. O La.. cn X /~ LCC W -I ' = 4'w

a. n C 0: W U CDiL V)=m w :m: 3

63

Page 70: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

e -clJ 00~oC CW)#6

V) 00-(

LL. q' l

z -I - 4,L In 0

+ 0>cwo~l co ~-it

>1

#A

-j qtc)0e) P'.I- C- wEnrý(P%-I IflmW)4*L

V) CD O 4

L&. CO C0 ..- d

CD 0A 0~4

Ow 4A-I 0 w C

- ONO '- r- X0~ to0VL0 D

CD LAJ 4.1 M -( L) r- CU

LU j I- Go 0 %C0

I LaL 1a. 00 EI r-- coP 4C. lV) - M - CJ L

Le) 04.1r-LgOW~~ 0to1Ei-~LI 9-

Ln @1

I- - 40 >.c

40 aIn

-i - 4-b0 'n"

_j ce.I-- I= I.- U) 6 V

09 LUO WO w I- CD0

I- LU - 0oEu iZLL..C =~ LL..C 09 I- >1- C #A L

CD 0 - CD 0 1--C CO -j j..

no 0 LLw ... i w jus n c 1

'- LWI Lai- z ~0 4J 40

VU) In 0 z CL. C L.LAU Lii Ld >-..J Li >-.. i- w E to -tn ix 0 -. 1 CA CD ~06uV) WU). 4A ~ -J- CC - 01rarLU 1-S. LUJ u-4 I LUI "-E = .. U 0 0"CL 5)cac0L. L L. ,AD. LI 'C>i WOOC 2-c) C' Li U -

XU LLU uLwJIi 0.. 0.1c

64

Page 71: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

Job satisfaction indicators for specialty jobs were also examined toidentify jobs having high or low job satisfaction (see Table 37). Jobs withthe highest job satisfaction indicators include the Computer Programmers,Technical School Personnel, and Systems Implementation Personnel. The lowestrated jobs included Message Distribution Center Personnel, Switchboard Opera-tors, and Communications Operations Personnel. As expected, most jobs whichaligned functionally with a pre-merger AFSC had comparable job satisfactionindicators to those AFSCs.

IMPLICATIONS

As explained in the INTRODUCTION, this survey was requested by HQ USAF/SCBH to assess the impact of the merger which formed these specialties and togather data for assessing training needs within these two Communications-Computer career ladders. Five jobs and four clusters containing a large num-ber of jobs within them were identified in this survey. All major functionsidentified in previous surveys were again identified in this survey. Jobsperformed by DAFSC 491X2 personnel were very homogeneous, while DAFSC 491Xlpersonnel performed a much more hetergeneous job. Both career ladders haveadequate training programs, although the STSs and POIs from both career lad-ders need to be reviewed by training personnel and functional managers.According to guidelines in ATCR 52-22, both STSs had 3-skill level proficiencycoding below that indicated by survey data, and above that indicated by surveydata, while both POIs had unsupported objectives.

Based on such factors as the large number of common tasks performedbetween the two clusters which aligned with different pre-merger AFSCs; thestable and positive job satisfaction expressed by survey respondents; and theresults of the comparisons to previous surveys which identified all majorfunctions performed by the pre-merger AFSCs, the formation of the 491X1 and491X2 specialties seems to be supported by the results of this survey.

65

Page 72: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

0 L

LAfl (C5h O

U, l co IIa c ' q D% ,

V) C. cx 11>. E La

CL U, ( CL S- I-Cl .

Cie

>- ~ I V)Ci

I.- -( % L L-0 )U

C-E CC~) (n a 0 %)r CPI W) a Ul

CLU

tnt-

- W~ In

.J C, W~ alcc Q co W a.

La M

%a- eq %00

W)L L )HLf9 W-(~ (5. ( *L LL <

CL

C13.

00 9. LUI = 0u.. 0a CL Z

04.1

cc U)c %0n-- r-('U U)i CJC'

W L Z ' I 4-'005 LU ZL CC.. 00. a

a,

400

W - CLI-)9 2c w 0-

4n) W -U. 9-L.

) LUL M 1-. U. -1 0 41~~ ca0 4. LU - J-

LU 9- C.E C)P- 0E a. ccV

m n La 0i W . 0w -j . 9- C

(D 0:I -j 03 a f=.4

) W U- = .u = U CA LU 09-)- AA

U0. a-n 0. 4A ~ . U- Z LUW

66

Page 73: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

APPENDIX A

67

Page 74: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE Al

COMPUTER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 856 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 25%AVERAGE TICF: 54 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 72 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 64

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

F187 REQUEST SYSTEM INFORMATION VIA CONSOLE 85F169 NOTIFY AFFECTED PERSONNEL, SUCH AS SUPERVISORS OR REMOTE

USERS, OF MACHINE FAILURES OR DOWNTIME 85F188 RESPOND TO SYSTEM REQUESTS 84F167 MOUNT OR DISMOUNT MAGNETIC MEDIA 83F155 LABEL MAGNETIC MEDIA EXTERNALLY 80F143 ENTER DATA VIA CONSOLE 74F178 POWER UP OR POWER DOWN COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

EQUIPMENT 74Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 72ElOl INITIALIZE PROCESSING, SUCH AS BATCHED JOB, ON-LINE, OR

OFF-LINE 69E117 RESPOND TO INQUIRIES FROM CUSTOMERS, SUCH AS COMPUTER JOB

OR MESSAGE STATUS 69F177 PERFORM RECOVERY PROCEDURES ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER

SYSTEMS 69E90 CHECK OPERATIONAL STATUS OF EQUIPMENT 68F190 SET OR RESET COMPUTER TIME CLOCKS 67F153 ISOLATE CAUSES OF MACHINE STOPS OR MALFUNCTIONS 64F181 PREPARE PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT FOR OPERATION 64F150 INTERPRET INDICATING LIGHTS ON PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT 63F174 PERFORM OPERATOR MAINTENANCE ON COt.1UNICATIONS-COMPUTER

SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 61EllO MAKE ENTRIES ON SHIFT SUPERVISOR LOGS 60F132 ANALYZE CONSOLE DISPLAYS OR SYSTEM PRINTOUTS 59

Al

Page 75: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A2

COMPUTER OPERATORS

GROUP SIZE: 567 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 16%AVERAGE TICF: 55 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 74 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 67

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

F188 RESPOND TO SYSTEM REQUESTS 97F169 NOTIFY AFFECTED PERSONNEL, SUCH AS SUPERVISORS OR REMOTE

USERS, OF MACHINE FAILURES OR DOWNTIME 96F187 REQUEST SYSTEM INFORMATION VIA CONSOLE 95F167 MOUNT OR DISMOUNT MAGNETIC MEDIA 94F178 POWER UP OR POWER DOWN COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

EQUIPMENT 92F155 LABEL MAGNETIC MEDIA EXTERNALLY 91F190 SET OR RESET COMPUTER TIME CLOCKS 85F177 PERFORM RECOVERY PROCEDURES ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER

SYSTEMS 83F181 PREPARE PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT FOR OPERATION 82E90 CHECK OPERATIONAL STATUS OF EQUIPMENT 81F153 ISOLATE CAUSES OF MACHINE STOPS OR MALFUNCTIONS 80F143 ENTER DATA VIA CONSOLE 80F150 INTERPRET INDICATING LIGHTS ON PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT 80F174 PERFORM OPERATOR MAINTENANCE ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER

SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 78Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 76EllO MAKE ENTRIES ON SHIFT SUPERVISOR LOGS 76ElOl INITIALIZE PROCESSING, SUCH AS BATCHED JOB, ON-LINE, OR

OFF-LINE 75Ell7 RESPOND TO INQUIRIES FROM CUSTOMERS, SUCH AS COMPUTER JOB

OR MESSAGE STATUS 71F176 PERFORM OR PRACTICE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

EMERGENCY SYSTEMS 69F172 PERFORM COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEM INITIALIZATION

PROCEDURES 68

A2

Page 76: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A3

MAGNETIC MEDIA LIBRARIANS

GROUP SIZE: 75 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 2%AVERAGE TICF: 44 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 53 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 56

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

K268 FILE MAGNETIC MEDIA 99K261 CLEAN MAGNETIC MEDIA 95K270 ISSUE MAGNETIC MEDIA FROM LIBRARY 92K264 DEGAUSS MAGNETIC MEDIA 92K269 INVENTORY MAGNETIC MEDIA 92K259 ACCEPT RETURNED MAGNETIC MEDIA 91K279 VISUALLY INSPECT MAGNETIC MEDIA 89F155 LABEL MAGNETIC MEDIA EXTERNALLY 88K273 PLACE LOAD-POINT OR END-OF-TAPE MARKERS ON MAGNETIC TAPE 85K278 UPDATE SCRATCH TAPES OR DISK PACK LISTS 83K271 MAINTAIN OFF-SITE OR REMOTE STORAGE BACKUP FILES 83K260 CERTIFY MAGNETIC MEDIA 83K266 ESTABLISH OR UPDATE MAGNETIC MEDIA ACCOUNTABILITY RECORDS 83K272 MAKE ENTRIES IN MAGNETIC MEDIA CONTROL LOGS 80E099 IDENTIFY MAGNETIC MEDIA NEEDED FROM OR TO BE RETURNED TO

OFF-SITE STORAGE 76K265 DESTROY MAGNETIC MEDIA 76K263 COORDINATE MAGNETIC MEDIA REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS WITH

SYSTEM CONSOLE OPERATORS OR SYSTEM MONITORS 72Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 72E100 IDENTIFY TAPE FAILURES 69K262 COMPARE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL LABELS AGAINST RUN SHEETS 69

A3

Page 77: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A4

SYSTEMS SECURITY PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 12 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: LESS THAN 1%AVERAGE TICF: 47 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 83 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 57

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

Q568 STORE OR SAFEGUARD CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 100Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 100Q548 MARK OR STAMP SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED OR CLASSIFIED

INFORMATION, OTHER THAN MESSAGES 100Q562 REPORT SECURITY VIOLATIONS 100Q542 INVENTORY CLASSIFIED OR COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY

(COMSEC) MATERIALS 92Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 92Q570 WITNESS DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 92F188 RESPOND TO SYSTEM REQUESTS 92Q552 PERFORM PHYSICAL SECURITY INSPECTIONS OF FACILITIES 83Q546 MAINTAIN VISITOR REGISTERS 83Q537 DISTRIBUTE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 83Q529 AUTHORIZE OR DENY ACCESS TO RESTICTED OR CONTROLLED AREAS

OR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 75Q567 SIGN RECEIPTS FOR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 67F178 POWER UP OR POWER DOWN COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

EQUIPMENT 67F155 LABEL MAGNETIC MEDIA EXTERNALLY 67F190 SET OR RESET COMPUTER TIME CLOCKS 67Ell7 RESPOND TO INQUIRIES FROM CUSTOMERS, SUCH AS COMPUTER JOB

OR MESSAGE STATUS 58Q549 PAGE COUNT CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 58Q533 DESIGNATE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FOR DESTRUCTION 58Q541 INSPECT CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 58

A4

Page 78: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A5

PRODUCTION CONTROL PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 124 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 4%AVERAGE TICF: 61 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 78 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 65

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

E117 RESPOND TO INQUIRIES FROM CUSTOMERS, SUCH AS COMPUTER JOBOR MESSAGE STATUS 94

G196 ASSEMBLE INPUT OR OUTPUT DATA 85ElOl INITIALIZE PROCESSING, SUCH AS BATCHED JOB, ON-LINE, OR

OFF-LINE 82E130 WORK WITH USERS IN RESOLVING COMPUTER SOFTWARE

MALFUNCTIONS OR PROBLEMS 81E93 COORDINATE WITH SUBSCRIBERS OR CUSTOMERS ON MATTERS SUCH

AS OPERATIONAL OR PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS 81F169 NOTIFY AFFECTED PERSONNEL, SUCH AS SUPERVISORS OR REMOTE

USERS, OF MACHINE FAILURES OR DOWNTIME 81E116 PROVIDE CUSTOMERS WITH SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION CHANGES 81F187 REQUEST SYSTEM INFORMATION VIA CONSOLE 77G205 ESTABLISH OR UPDATE COMPUTER RUN PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS 75F143 ENTER DATA VIA CONSOLE 75G212 REVIEW COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS SOFTWARE RELEASE

OR PATCH DOCUMENTATION 74F139 COORDINATE SCHEDULED DOWNTIME WITH MAIN SITE, OFFICE OF

PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY (OPR), AND REMOTE USERS 74F154 ISOLATE PROBLEMS ON PRODUCTION RUNS 73E94 DISTRIBUTE MESSAGES OR OUTPUT PRODUCTS 72G203 EDIT INPUT OR OUTPUT DATA 72F193 TRANSFER PROGRAMS OR DATA FROM ONE MEDIA TO ANOTHER MEDIA 70G208 PREPARE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS RUN PROCESSING

INSTRUCTIONS 69E119 REVIEW COMPUTER OUTPUT PRODUCTS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH

STANDARDS OR SPECIFICATIONS 69G211 REVIEW COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS RUN PROCESSING

INSTRUCTIONS 68G298 ANSWER SUPERVISORY LIGHTS 67

A5

Page 79: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A6

COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 822 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 24%AVERAGE TICF: 53 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 66 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 67

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

1240 PREPARE SERVICE MESSAGES 911229 FOLLOW UP SERVICE MESSAGES 891223 ANNOTATE TIME OF TRANSMISSION OR RECEIPT ON MESSAGES 881247 STAMP MESSAGES WITH SPECIAL HANDLING, PRECEDENCE, OR

CLASSIFICATION 861233 MAINTAIN SERVICE MESSAGE LOGS OR FILES 851224 ASSIGN ROUTING INDICATORS 83Q570 WITNESS DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 80Elll NOTIFY ADDRESSEES OR DISTRIBUTION CENTERS OF HIGH

PRECEDENCE MESSAGE RECEIPT 77Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 76Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE

UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 76Q537 DISTRIBUTE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 75Q542 INVENTORY CLASSIFIED OR COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY

(COMSEC) MATERIALS 731235 MAKE ENTRIES ON DD FORMS 1503 (MESSAGE CORRECTION NOTICES) 71E94 DISTRIBUTE MESSAGES OR OUTPUT PRODUCTS 69F178 POWER UP OR POWER DOWN COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

EQUIPMENT 68Q568 STORE OR SAFEGUARD CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 67E11O MAKE ENTRIES OF SHIFT SUPERVISOR LOGS 67Ell5 PREPARE UNCLASSIFIED MEDIA FOR MAIL, DELIVERY, OR

DISTRIBUTION 661246 SEPARATE INCOMING MESSAGES FOR DISTRIBUTION OR COMMERCIAL

REFILE 651236 PERFORM ALTERNATE ROUTING OF MESSAGE TRAFFIC 65

A6

Page 80: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

I

TABLE A7

TELECOMMUNICATIONS OPERATORS

GROUP SIZE: 634 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 18%AVERAGE TICF: 51 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 63 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER TASKS PERFORMED: 68

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

1240 PREPARE SERVICE MESSAGES 911229 FOLLOW UP SERVICE MESSAGES 891223 ANNOTATE TIME OF TRANSMISSION OR RECEIPT ON MESSAGES 881247 STAMP MESSAGES WITH SPECIAL HANDLING, PRECEDENCE, OR

CLASSIFICATION 861233 MAINTAIN SERVICE MESSAGE LOGS OR FILES 851224 ASSIGN ROUTING INDICATORS 83Elll NOTIFY ADDRESSEES OR DISTRIBUTION CENTERS OF HIGH

PRECEDENCE MESSAGE RECEIPT 77Q570 WITNESS DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 80Q537 DISTRIBUTE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 751235 MAKE ENTRIES ON DD FORMS 1503 (MESSAGE CORRECTION NOTICES) 71Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE

UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 76E94 DISTRIBUTE MESSAGES OR OUTPUT PRODUCTS 69Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 76F178 POWER UP OR POWER DOWN COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

EQUIPMENT 681246 SEPARATE INCOMING MESSAGES FOR DISTRIBUTION OR COMMERCIAL

REFILE 65Q542 INVENTORY CLASSIFIED OR COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY

(COMSEC) MATERIALS 73EllO MAKE ENTRIES OF SHIFT SUPERVISOR LOGS 67E115 PREPARE UNCLASSIFIED MEDIA FOR MAIL, DELIVERY, OR

DISTRIBUTION 66F169 NOTIFY AFFECTED PERSONNEL, SUCH AS SUPERVISORS OR REMOTE

USERS, OF MACHINE FAILURES OR DOWNTIME 1001236 PERFORM ALTERNATE ROUTING OF MESSAGE TRAFFIC 65

A7

Page 81: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A8

SWITCHING CENTER PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 13 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: LESS THAN 1%AVERAGE TICF: 34 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 41 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 40

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

1240 PREPARE SERVICE MESSAGES 85F167 MOUNT OR DISMOUNT MAGNETIC MEDIA 851229 FOLLOW UP SERVICE MESSAGES 85F187 REQUEST SYSTEM INFORMATION VIA CONSOLE 77F188 RESPOND TO SYSTEM REQUESTS 77H217 MAKE ENTRIES ON INTERCEPT LOGS 771227 DIRECT MESSAGES TO INTERCEPT 77F173 PERFORM MAGNETIC MEDIA SEARCHES 771223 ANNOTATE TIME OF TRANSMISSION OR RECEIPT ON MESSAGES 69K269 INVENTORY MAGNETIC MEDIA 691237 PREPARE HEADERS AND END OF TRANSMISSION (EOT) CARDS FOR

DATA MESSAGES 69F177 PERFORM RECOVERY PROCEDURES ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER

SYSTEMS 691224 ASSIGN ROUTING INDICATORS 541247 STAMP MESSAGES WITH SPECIAL HANDLING, PRECEDENCE, OR

CLASSIFICATION 541233 MAINTAIN SERVICE MESSAGE LOGS OR FILES 541239 PREPARE PAPER TAPE MESSAGES 541236 PERFORM ALTERNATE ROUTING OF MESSAGE TRAFFIC 54H220 PLACE SWITCHING CIRCUITS INTO OR OUT OF SERVICE 46H219 PLACE REMOTE TERMINALS INTO OR OUT OF SERVICE 46K272 MAKE ENTRIES frMAGNETIC MEDIA CONTROL LOGS 46

A8

Page 82: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A9

MOBILITY PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 98 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 3%AVERAGE TICF: 60 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 80 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 65

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

L280 CAMOUFLAGE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 93L284 PALLETIZE EQUIPMENT 87L285 PERFORM GUARD DUTY 86Q542 INVENTORY CLASSIFIED OR COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY

(COMSEC) MATERIALS 82Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE

UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 81Q570 WITNESS DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 791223 ANNOTATE TIME OF TRANSMISSION OR RECEIPT ON MESSAGES 791233 MAINTAIN SERVICE MESSAGE LOGS OR FILES 78L290 PERFORM OPERATOR'S BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER OPERATION

CHECKS OR SERVICES ON VEHICLES 771224 ASSIGN ROUTING INDICATORS 76Q549 PAGE COUNT CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 76Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 76L282 ERECT TACTICAL AIR BASE CONTONEMENT AREAS 73L283 MAINTAIN MOBILE ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT KITS 731240 PREPARE SERVICE MESSAGES 731234 MAKE ENTRIES OF AF FORMS 1035 (CHANNEL NUMBER) 72Q546 MAINTAIN VISITOR REGISTERS 71L295 SET UP COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS AT SITES 70L286 PERFORM INITIAL TESTS OF SYSTEMS IN A MOBILE ENVIRONMENT 70Q529 AUTHORIZE OR DENY ACCESS TO RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLED

AREAS OR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 70

A9

Page 83: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A1O

TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECURITY PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 12 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: LESS THAN 1%AVERAGE TICF: 63 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 71 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 33

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

1247 STAMP MESSAGES WITH SPECIAL HANDLING, PRECEDENCE, ORCLASSIFICATION 92

Q570 WITNESS DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 921240 PREPARE SERVICE MESSAGES 921229 FOLLOW UP SERVICE MESSAGES 83Q568 STORE OR SAFEGUARD CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 75Q542 INVENTORY CLASSIFIED OR COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY

(COMSEC) MATERIALS 75Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE

UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 75Q529 AUTHORIZE OR DENY ACCESS TO RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLED

AREAS OR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 75Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 75Q537 DISTRIBUTE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 671233 MAINTAIN SERVICE MESSAGE LOGS OR FILES 67Q554 PREPARE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FOR MAIL, DELIVERY, OR

DISTRIBUTION 58H221 POST ROUTING INDICATOR CHANGES 581224 ASSIGN ROUTING INDICATORS 58Q562 REPORT SECURITY VIOLATIONS 581235 MAKE ENTRIES ON DD FORMS 1503 (MESSAGE CORRECTION NOTICES) 58Q546 MAINTAIN VISITOR REGISTERS 50Q552 PERFORM PHYSICAL SECURITY INSPECTIONS OF FACILITIES 50Q541 INSPECT CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 42

AlO

Page 84: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE All

TRAFFIC ANALYSES PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 44 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%AVERAGE TICF: 73 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 91 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 62

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

J257 REVIEW MESSAGES FOR PROPER HANDLING 98J256 REVIEW MESSAGES FOR ACCURACY 98J258 REVIEW TRAFFIC LOGS OR FILES 93J250 MAINTAIN GENERAL MESSAGE FILES 91J252 MAINTAIN MESSAGE OR TRACER ACTION CASE FILES 801229 FOLLOW UP SERVICE MESSAGES 77J248 MAINTAIN ADDRESS INDICATOR GROUP (AIG) FILES 75E117 RESPOND TO INQUIRIES FROM CUSTOMERS, SUCH AS COMPUTER

JOB OR MESSAGE STATUS 751240 PREPARE SERVICE MESSAGES 75E93 COORDINATE WITH SUBSCRIBERS OR CUSTOMERS ON MATTERS

SUCH AS OPERATIONAL OR PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS 68E106 MAINTAIN PUBLICATION FILES 68Q568 STORE OR SAFEGUARD CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 68Q570 WITNESS DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 681235 MAKE ENTRIES ON DD FORMS 1503 (MESSAGE CORRECTION NOTICES) 66E89 ANALYZE OR EVALUATE STATISTICAL DATA 64H221 POST ROUTING INDICATOR CHANGES 64J253 MAINTAIN PLAIN LANGUAGE ADDRESS (PLA) TABLES 61J251 MAINTAIN MESSAGE DISTRIBUTION (MD) TABLES 59

All

Page 85: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A12

FUNCTIONAL AREA MANAGERS

GROUP SIZE: 636 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 18%AVERAGE TICF: 126 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 163 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 78

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 74A8 ESTABLISH ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES, OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS

(00), OR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 73A4 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 73B22 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY-RELATED

PROBLEMS 72C56 PREPARE APR 68A6 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 68B32 INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, OR PROCEDURES FOR

SUBORDINATES 67Q568 STORE OR SAFEGUARD CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 62A3 DETERMINE REQUIREMENTS FOR SPACE, PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT

OR SUPPLIES 61C46 EVALUATE INSPECTION REPORTS OR PROCEDURES 61B40 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 61C59 WRITE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AWARDS OR DECORATIONS 61Q570 WITNESS DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 60A20 SCHEDULE LEAVES OR PASSES 60Q530 CHANGE LOCK COMBINATIONS OF SAFES, VAULTS, OR CIPHER

LOCKS 60Q562 REPORT SECURITY VIOLATIONS 59Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE

UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 59C43 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 57A16 PLAN WORK ASSIGNMENTS 56

A12

Page 86: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A13

COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SUPERVISORS

GROUP SIZE: 344 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 10%AVERAGE TICF: 132 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 182 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 93

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

B22 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY-RELATEDPROBLEMS 96

C56 PREPARE APR 93B32 INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, OR PROCEDURES FOR

SUBORDINATES 89A8 ESTABLISH ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES, OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS (01),

OR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOR) 88A4 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 85C59 WRITE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AWARDS OR DECORATIONS 85A20 SCHEDULE LEAVES OR PASSES 84A9 ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SUBORDINATES 81A6 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 81A3 DETERMINE REQUIREMENTS FOR SPACE, PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT

OR SUPPLIES 80C43 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 79C45 EVALUATE INDIVIDUALS FOR PROMOTION, DEMOTION, OR

RECLASSIFICATION 77Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 77Al ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO DUTY POSITIONS 76A16 PLAN WORK ASSIGNMENTS 76C52 EVALUATE WORK SCHEDULES 73C53 INDORSE AIRMAN PERFORMANCE REPORTS (APR) 72C46 EVALUATE INSPECTION REPORTS OR PROCEDURES 72B36 SUPERVISE 5-LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

OPERATOR PERSONNEL (AFSC 49151) 72A2 ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO DUTY POSITIONS 69

A 13

Page 87: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A14

COMSEC ACCOUNTANTS

GROUP SIZE: 166 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 5%AVERAGE TICF: 114 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 130 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 61

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 99Q570 WITNESS DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 96Q542 INVENTORY CLASSIFIED OR COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY

(COMSEC) MATERIALS 96Q555 PREPARE DESTRUCTION REPORTS FOR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 94Q549 PAGE COUNT CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 93Q545 MAINTAIN COMSEC ACCOUNT RECORDS 92Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE

UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 92Q530 CHANGE LOCK COMBINATIONS OF SAFES, VAULTS, OR CIPHER

LOCKS 90Q567 SIGN RECEIPTS FOR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 870543 ISSUE COMSEC MATERIALS 85Q537 DISTRIBUTE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 85Q533 DESIGNATE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FOR DESTRUCTION 84Q541 INSPECT CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 83Q562 REPORT SECURITY VIOLATIONS 82Q551 PERFORM COURIER FUNCTIONS 80Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 80Q544 MAINTAIN COMSEC ACCOUNT READINESS ACTIONS 77Q548 MARK OR STAMP SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED OR CLASSIFIED

INFORMATION, OTHER THAN MESSAGES 74Q529 AUTHORIZE OR DENY ACCESS TO RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLED 71

AIA

Page 88: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A15

UNIT SECURITY MANAGERS

GROUP SIZE: 32 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%AVERAGE TICF: 146 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 179 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 37

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

B29 IMPLEMENT SECURITY PROGRAMS 94A15 PLAN SECURITY PROGRAMS 94Q531 CONDUCT SECURITY BRIEFINGS OR DEBRIEFINGS 91Q550 PERFORM ADMINISTRATIVE SECURITY INSPECTIONS 88C49 EVALUATE SECURITY PROGRAMS 84Q552 PERFORM PHYSICAL SECURITY INSPECTIONS OF FACILITIES 81Q562 REPORT SECURITY VIOLATIONS 78Q568 STORE OR SAFEGUARD CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 72Q564 REVIEW DOCUMENTS FOR SECURITY VIOLATIONS 72Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE

UNCLASSIFEID MATERIALS 69All PLAN BRIEFINGS 66Q530 CHANGE LOCK COMBINATIONS OF SAFES, VAULTS, OR CIPHER

LOCKS 63B40 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 59Q541 INSPECT CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 56Q560 PREPARE OR REVISE SECURITY PROCEDURES CHECKLISTS 56Q529 AUTHORIZE OR DENY ACCESS TO RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLED

AREAS OR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 53Q533 DESIGNATE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FOR DESTRUCTION 53Q570 WITNESS DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 53Q567 SIGN RECEIPTS FOR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 53C46 EVALUATE INSPECTION REPORTS OR PROCEDURES 50A6 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 44

A15

Page 89: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A16

CONTRACTING AND BUDGETING PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 17 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: LESS THAN 1%AVERAGE TICF: 110 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 136 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 120

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

C48 EVALUATE MAINTENANCE OR USE OF WORKSPACE, EQUIPMENT, ORSUPPLIES 94

A3 DETERMINE REQUIREMENTS FOR SPACE, PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENTOR SUPPLIES 94

B25 DIRECT UTILIZATION OF EQUIPMENT 88C42 EVALUATE BUDGET OR FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS 82R575 CONFIRM CONTRACT TERMS, SUCH AS DELIVERY DATE OR QUANTITY 76R603 RESEARCH STATUS OF PURCHASE ORDERS 76R598 PREPARE PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS, SUCH AS REQUISITIONS,

INVOICES, OR VOUCHERS 76R587 INVENTORY EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, OR SUPPLIES 76A7 DRAFT BUDGET OR FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS 76R578 DISPOSE OF EXCESS OR UNSERVICEABLE TOOLS, SUPPLIES, OR

EQUIPMENT 76R581 ESTABLISH OR UPDATE INVENTORY OR STOCK CONTROL RECORDS 71R609 VERIFY VALIDITY OF SUPPLY REQUESTS 65R582 ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OR OTHER

CONTRACTURAL SUPPORT SERVICES 65R571 ADMINISTER DELIVERY OF OPEN PURCHASE ORDERS 65R592 MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACTS 59R599 PREPARE SUPPLY DOCUMENTS, SUCH AS REQUISITIONS, INVOICES,

OR VOUCHERS 59

A16

Page 90: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A17

SWITCHBOARD SUPERVISORS

GROUP SIZE: 14 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: LESS THAN 1%AVERAGE TICF: 102 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 149 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 67

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

M315 PLACE CALLS BETWEEN SUBSCRIBERS, OTHER THAN SPECIALHANDLING CALLS 93

M301 COMPILE TELEPHONE DIRECTORIES 93B36 SUPERVISE 5-LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

OPERATOR PERSONNEL (AFSC 49151) 93M311 MAINTAIN TELEPHONE DIRECTORIES 93M320 SUPERVISE MINIMIZE CONDITION ACTIONS 93M302 COORDINATE SWITCHBOARD CIRCUIT OR EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS

WITH MAINTENANCE, TECHNICAL CONTROL, OR SUPPORT AGENCIES 86M297 ACCEPT AND CONNECT CALLS ACCORDING TO THEIR PRECEDENCE 86B34 SUPERVISE 3-LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEM

OPERATOR PERSONNEL (AFSC 49131) 86D64 CONDUCT OJT 86D78 EVALUATE OJT TRAINEES 86M312 MONITOR HIGH PRECEDENCE OR EMERGENCY CALLS 86A8 ESTABLISH ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES, OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS (00),

OR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 79D81 MAINTAIN TRAINING RECORDS, CHARTS, OR GRAPHS 79M322 TEST SWITCHBOARD CIRCUITS 79M298 ANSWER SUPERVISORY LIGHTS 79D67 COUNSEL TRAINEES ON TRAINING PROGRESS 79B32 INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, OR PROCEDURES FOR

SUBORDINATES 79M310 MAINTAIN SWITCHBOARD INSTRUCTIONS FOR EMERGENCIES, SUCH

AS -IRE, CRASH, OR ATTACK 79M318 PROCESS TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALLS 79

A17

Page 91: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A18

UNIT TRAINING MANAGERS

GROUP SIZE: 21 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%AVERAGE TICF: 127 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 150 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 58

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

D80 EVALUATE TRAINING METHODS OR TECHNIQUES 90D78 EVALUATE OJT TRAINEES 90D75 DIRECT OR IMPLEMENT OJT PROGRAMS 90D69 DETERMINE OJT REQUIREMENTS 86D64 CONDUCT OJT 86D82 PLAN OJT 81D67 COUNSEL TRAINEES ON TRAINING PROGRESS 81D74 DEVELOP TRAINING AIDS 76D68 DEMONSTRATE HOW TO LOCATE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 76D72 DEVELOP LESSON PLANS 71D61 ADMINISTER TESTS 71C56 PREPARE APR 71C43 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 67B22 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY-RELATED

PROBLEMS 67D81 MAINTAIN TRAINING RECORDS, CHARTS, OR GRAPHS 62D76 DIRECT OR IMPLEMENT TRAINING PROGRAMS, OTHER THAN OJT 62B32 INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, OR PROCEDURES FOR

SUBORDINATES 62C46 EVALUATE INSPECTION REPORTS OR PROCEDURES 57D85 WRITE TEST QUESTIONS 57D83 PROCURE TRAINING AIDS, SPACE, OR EQUIPMENT 57

A18

Page 92: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A19

COMPUTER PROGRAMMERS

GROUP SIZE: 635 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 18%AVERAGE TICF: 56 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 107 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 85

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

0400 DEBUG COMPUTER PROGRAMS 880398 COMPILE OR ASSEMBLE PROGRAMS 830405 DETERMINE CAUSES OF ABNORMAL PROGRAM HALTS 820404 DESK CHECK PROGRAMS 800394 CODE COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN HIGH LEVEL COMPILER LANGUAGES 78P523 TEST COMPUTER PROGRAMS 760435 MAINTAIN SOURCE CODE LISTINGS 640473 REVIEW SOURCE CODE LISTINGS 62N333 DESIGN INPUT OR OUTPUT FORMATS 59E130 WORK WITH USERS IN RESOLVING COMPUTER SOFTWARE

MALFUNCTIONS OR PROBLEMS 580399 COORDINATE WITH USERS ON NEW SYSTEM RELEASES 550397 CODE JOB CONTROL RUN STREAMS IN JOB CONTROL LANGUAGES 55N326 ASSIST FUNCTIONAL USERS IN CONCEPTUALIZING OR DEFINING

REQUIREMENTS 510402 DESIGN ERROR HANDLING ROUTINES 500484 WRITE JOB CONTROL RUN STREAMS 480483 WRITE FUNCTIONAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAMS 47N372 PREPARE INPUT OR OUTPUT FILE SPECIFICATIONS 470465 REVIEW INPUT OR OUTPUT FORMATS 46N324 ANALYZE DATA BASE REQUIREMENTS 46N373 PREPARE OR REVISE PROGRAM SPECIFICATIONS 45

A19

Page 93: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A20

APPLICATIONS PROGRAMMERS

GROUP SIZE: 303 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 9%AVERAGE TICF: 45 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 89 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 63

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

0400 DEBUG COMPUTER PROGRAMS 970398 COMPILE OR ASSEMBLE PROGRAMS 960394 CODE COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN HIGH LEVEL COMPILER LANGUAGES 940404 DESK CHECK PROGRAMS 930405 DETERMINE CAUSES OF ABNORMAL PROGRAM HALTS 91P523 TEST COMPUTER PROGRAMS 800435 MAINTAIN SOURCE CODE LISTINGS 780473 REVIEW SOURCE CODE LISTINGS 74N333 DESIGN INPUT OR OUTPUT FORMATS 710402 DESIGN ERROR HANDLING ROUTINES 640397 CODE JOB CONTROL RUN STREAMS IN JOB CONTROL LANGUAGES 620483 WRITE FUNCTIONAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAMS 590399 COORDINATE WITH USERS ON NEW SYSTEM RELEASES 560484 WRITE JOB CONTROL RUN STREAMS 54N331 DESIGN DATA ELEMENTS OR CODES 53N372 PREPARE INPUT OR OUTPUT FILE SPECIFICATIONS 53N332 DESIGN FILES BY GROUPING RECORDS 520465 REVIEW INPUT OR OUTPUT FORMATS 520403 DESIGN RECORDS BY GROUPING DATA ELEMENTS 51N326 ASSIST FUNCTIONAL USERS IN CONCEPTUALIZING OR DEFINING

REQUIREMENTS 51

A20

Page 94: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A21

PROGRAMMER ANALYSTS

GROUP SIZE: 69 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 2%AVERAGE TICF: 77 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 156 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 178

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

0405 DETERMINE CAUSES OF ABNORMAL PROGRAM HALTS 970400 DEBUG COMPUTER PROGRAMS 960404 DESK CHECK PROGRAMS 96P523 TEST COMPUTER PROGRAMS 940398 COMPILE OR ASSEMBLE PROGRAMS 94E130 WORK WITH USERS IN RESOLVING COMPUTER SOFTWARE

MALFUNCTIONS OR PROBLEMS 880394 CODE COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN HIGH LEVEL COMPILER LANGUAGES 860467 REVIEW PROGRAM SPECIFICATIONS 83A4 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 810466 REVIEW PROGRAM MAINTENANCE MANUALS 81N333 DESIGN INPUT OR OUTPUT FORMATS 800465 REVIEW INPUT OR OUTPUT FORMATS 80A6 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 770414 DEVELOP INPUTS TO COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS USER

MANUALS 75E93 COORDINATE WITH SUBSCRIBERS OR CUSTOMERS ON MATTERS SUCH

AS OPERATIONAL OR PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS 74D68 DEMONSTRATE HOW TO LOCArE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 71A8 ESTABLISH ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES, OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS

(OIH, OR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 68A9 ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SUBORDINATES 65B32 INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, OR PROCEDURES FOR

SUBORDINATES 65B22 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY-RELATED

PROBLEMS 64

A21

Page 95: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

F

TABLE A22

DATA BASE ANALYSTS

GROUP SIZE: 11 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: LESS THAN 1%AVERAGE TICF: 96 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 157 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 124

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

N324 ANALYZE DATA BASE REQUIREMENTS 100N377 REVIEW DATA BASE SPECIFICATIONS 100N330 DESIGN DATA BASE SEPCIFICATIONS 1000410 DEVELOP DATA BASE RECOVERY PROCEDURES 1000406 DETERMINE DATA BASE CHARACTERISTICS, SUCH AS SIZE OR

STRUCTURE 91N370 PREPARE CONCEPTUAL DATA BASE DIAGRAMS 91N344 DETERMINE METHODS OF ACCESSING DATA BASES 910396 CODE DATA BASE ACCESS ROUTINES 91N343 DETERMINE INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG FILES, DOCUMENTS, AND

DATA ITEMS 910412 DEVELOP DATA BASE UPDATE RECOVERY PROCEDURES 910326 ASSIST FUNCTIONAL USERS IN CONCEPTUALIZING OR DEFINING

REQUIREMENTS 910480 WRITE DATA BASE RETRIEVAL PROCEDURES 910400 DEBUG COMPUTER PROGRAMS 910411 DEVELOP DATA BASE RETRIEVAL PROCEDURES 91A8 ESTABLISH ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES, OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS

(01), OR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 910460 REVIEW DATA BASE RECOVERY PROCEDURES 910386 ANLAYZE DATA BASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (DBMS) MEMORY OR

STORAGE ALLOCATION 820437 MODIFY DATA BASE STRUCTURE 820462 REVIEW DATA BASE UPDATE PROCEDURES 820424 EVALUATE DATA BASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 73

A22

Page 96: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A23

ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE PROGRAMMERS

GROUP SIZE: 33 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%AVERAGE TICF: 50 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 110 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 64

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

0400 DEBUG COMPUTER PROGRAMS 1000398 COMPILE OR ASSEMBLE PROGRAMS 970393 CODE COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN ASSEMBLY LANGUAGES 910405 DETERMINE CAUSES OF ABNORMAL PROGRAM HALTS 91E112 PERFORM CALCULATIONS WITHIN A NUMBERING SYSTEM, OTHER

THAN DECIMAL, USING ELECTRONIC MEANS 85E114 PERFORM CHARACTER CONVERSION USING CHARACTER CONVERSION

CHARTS, SUCH AS ASCII TO BCD OR ASCII TO EBCDIC 820473 REVIEW SOURCE CODE LISTINGS 790430 GENERATE PROGRAM DUMPS 76E130 WORK WITH USERS IN RESOLVING COMPUTER SOFTWARE

MALFUNCTIONS OR PROBLEMS 73F171 PARTICIPATE WITH PROGRAMMERS IN TESTING OR DEBUGGING

PROGRAMS 670392 CHANGE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS SOFTWARE BY

PATCHING 610389 ANALYZE SYSTEM DUMPS 61F143 ENTER DATA VIA CONSOLE 61F187 REQUEST SYSTEM INFORMATION VIA CONSOLE 61F152 INTERROGATE MEMORY LOCATION VIA CONSOLES 52

A23

Page 97: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A24

SECURITY PROGRAMMERS

GROUP SIZE: 10 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: LESS THAN 1%AVERAGE TICF: 41 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 106 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 59

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

0397 CODE JOB CONTROL RUN STREAMS IN JOB CONTROL LANGUAGES 1000394 CODE COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN HIGH LEVEL COMPILER LANGUAGES 1000400 DEBUG COMPUTER PROGRAMS 1000398 COMPILE OR ASSEMBLE PROGRAMS 100Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE

UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 100Q533 DESIGNATE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FOR DESTRUCTION 90Q570 WITNESS DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 90Q567 SIGN RECEIPTS FOR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 80Q548 MARK OR STAMP SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED OR CLASSIFIED

INFORMATION, OTHER THAN MESSAGES 800473 REVIEW SOURCE CODE LISTINGS 80Q568 STORE OR SAFEGUARD CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 700404 DESK CHECK PROGRAMS 70P523 TEST COMPUTER PROGRAMS 700405 DETERMINE CAUSES OF ABNORMAL PROGRAM HALTS 700471 REVIEW SOFTWARE PROBLEM REPORTS 60Q541 INSPECT CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 60Q527 ASSIGN CONTROL NUMBERS TO CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS 60Q553 PLACE DOWNGRADING INSTRUCTIONS ON CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 600530 CHANGE LOCK COMBINATIONS OF SAFES, VAULTS, OR CIPHER LOCKS 60Q551 PERFORM COURIER FUNCTIONS 50

A24

Page 98: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A25

COMPUTER OPERATIONS SPECIALIST

GROUP SIZE: 17 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: LESS THAN 1%AVERAGE TICF: 68 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 82 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 315

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

F153 ISOLATE CAUSES OF MACHINE STOPS OR MALFUNCTIONS 100F154 ISOLATE PROBLEMS ON PRODUCTION RUNS 100F174 PERFORM OPERATOR MAINTENANCE ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER

SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 100F178 POWER UP OR POWER DOWN COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

EQUIPMENT 100A6 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 100E90 CHECK OPERATIONAL STATUS OF EQUIPMENT 100A8 ESTABLISH ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES, OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS

(01), OR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 100F1S5 INTERPRET INDICATING OR REGISTER LIGHTS ON CENTRAL

PROCESSING UNITS (CPU) OR MAINFRAMES 100F187 REQUEST SYSTEM INFORMATION VIA CONSOLE 100F155 LABEL MAGNETIC MEDIA EXTERNALLY 100F169 NOTIFY AFFECTED PERSONNEL, SUCH AS SUPERVISORS OR REMOTE

USERS, OF MACHINE FAILURES OR DOWNTIME 100F188 RESPOND TO SYSTEM REQUESTS 100F150 INTERPRET INDICATING LIGHTS ON PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT 100F175 PERFORM OPERATOR MAINTENANCE ON TEMPERATURE OR HUMIDITY

RECORDING DEVICES 100F177 PERFORM RECOVERY PROCEDURES ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER

SYSTEMS 100F176 PERFORM OR PRACTICE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

EMERGENCY PROCEDURES 100E94 DISTRIBUTE MESSAGES OR OUTPUT PRODUCTS 100E130 WORK WITH USERS IN RESOLVING COMPUTER SOFTWAREMALFUNCTIONS OR PROBLEMS

94ElOl INITIALIZE PROCESSING, SUCH AS BATCHED JOB, ON-LINE, OR

OFF-LINE 94C41 ANALYZE WORKLOAD REQUIREMENTS 94

A25

...............................................

Page 99: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A26

SYSTEMS TESTING PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 15 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: LESS THAN 1%AVERAGE TICF: 82 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 149 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 53

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

P523 TEST COMPUTER PROGRAMS 100P506 PARTICIPATE IN SOFTWARE ACCEPTANCE TESTS ON

COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS 100P511 REVIEW COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS TEST PLANS 87P489 ANALYZE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEM TEST RESULTS 80P510 REVIEW COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS INPUT TEST DATA 80P521 RUN VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION TESTS ON COMMUNICATIONS-

COMPUTER SYSTEMS 73P500 EVALUATE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEM TEST PLANS 730471 REVIEW SOFTWARE PROBLEM REPORTS 73P512 REVIEW COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS TEST REPORTS 67P508 PREPARE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS INPUT TEST DATA 67B40 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 67P524 TRACK STATUS OF SOFTWARE DISCREPANCIES 60P516 RUN INTERFACE TYPE TESTS ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER

SYSTEMS 60P519 RUN SUB-SYSTEMS TESTS ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS 60P520 RUN TOTAL SYSTEMS TESTS ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER

SYSTEMS 53P509 PREPARE PROGRAM TEST SPECIFICATIONS OR INSTRUCTIONS 53P518 RUN REGRESSION TESTS ON COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS 530443 PREPARE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEM TEST ANALYSIS

REPORTS 530442 PREPARE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEM SOFTWARE TEST

ANALYSIS REPORTS 53P493 DETERMINE IMPACT OF COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER APPLICATIONS

SYSTEMS ERRORS 47

A26

Page 100: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A27

PROGRAMMING NCOICS

GROUP SIZE: 18 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%AVERAGE TICF: 61 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 158 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 57

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

B22 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY-RELATEDPROBLEMS 100

L56 PREPARE APR 94B37 SUPERVISE 5-LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

PROGRAMMER PERSONNEL (AFSC 49152) 890398 COMPILE OR ASSEMBLE PROGRAMS 890404 DESK CHECK PROGRAMS 89D64 CONDUCT OJT 89D67 COUNSEL TRAINEES ON TRAINING PROGRESS 890394 CODE COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN HIGH LEVEL COMPILER LANGUAGES 830400 DEBUG COMPUTER PROGRAMS 83P523 TEST COMPUTER PROGRAMS 830405 DETERMINE CAUSES OF ABNORMAL PROGRAM HALTS 78D78 EVALUATE OJT TRAINEES 78N333 DESIGN INPUT OR OUTPUT FORMATS 72A20 SCHEDULE LEAVES OR PASSES 72B32 INTERPRET POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, OR PROCEDURES FOR

SUBORDINATES 67N373 PREPARE OR REVISE PROGRAM SPECIFICATIONS 67A9 ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SUBORDINATES 67D68 DEMONSTRATE HOW TO LOCATE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 67L43 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 61A4 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 61

A27

Page 101: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A28

MESSAGE DISTRIBUTION CENTER PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 22 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 1%AVERAGE TICF: 35 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 51 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 20

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENT

MEMBERSTASKS PERFORMING

Elll NOTIFY ADDRESSEES OR DISTRIBUTION CENTERS OF HIGHPRECEDENCE MESSAGE RECEIPT 91

1246 SEPARATE INCOMING MESSAGES FOR DISTRIBUTION OR COMMERCIALREFILE 82

1247 STAMP MESSAGES WITH SPECIAL HANDLING, PRECEDENCE, ORCLASSIFICATION 82

E94 DISTRIBUTE MESSAGES OR OUTPUT PRODUCTS 77Ell5 PREPARE UNCLASSIFIED MEDIA FOR MAIL, DELIVERY, OR

DISTRIBUTION 77E117 RESPOND TO INQUIRIES FROM CUSTOMERS, SUCH AS COMPUTER

JOB OR MESSAGE STATUS 68Q554 PREPARE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FOR MAIL, DELIVERY, OR

DISTRIBUTION 55Q537 DISTRIBUTE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 551223 ANNOTATE TIME OF TRANSMISSION OR RECEIPT ON MESSAGES 55F158 LOAD DATA OR MESSAGES INTO OPTICAL CHARACTER READERS

(OCR) OR OPTICAL SCAN UNITS 41Q524 TRACK STATUS OF SOFTWARE DISCREPANCIES 361235 MAKE ENTRIES ON DD FORMS 1035 (CHANNEL NUMBER) 36F159 LOAD MESSAGE OR DATA INTO PAPER TAPE READERS 36J256 REVIEW MESSAGES FOR ACCURACY 32Q534 DESTROY OR MAKE DISPOSITION OF CLASSIFIED OR SENSTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED MATERIAL 32J257 REVIEW MESSAGES FOR PROPER HANDLING 32F167 MOUNT OR DISMOUNT MAGNETIC MEDIA 32Q568 STORE OR SAFEGUARD CLASSIFIED MATERIAL 32Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 32

A28

Page 102: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A29

TECHNICAL SCHOOL PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 28 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 2%AVERAGE TICF: 90 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 126 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 30

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

D65 CONDUCT RESIDENT COURSE CLASSROOM TRAINING 93D72 DEVELOP LESSON PLANS 93D84 SCORE TESTS 89D61 ADMINISTER TESTS 86D74 DEVELOP TRAINING AIDS 86D85 WRITE TEST QUESTIONS 82D67 COUNSEL TRAINEES ON TRAINING PROGRESS 75D79 EVALUATE PROGRESS OF RESIDENT COURSE STUDENTS 64D68 DEMONSTRATE HOW TO LOCATE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 61B22 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL OR MILITARY-RELATED PROBLEMS 43D81 MAINTAIN TRAINING RECORDS, CHARTS, OR GRAPHS 43D80 EVALUATE TRAINING METHODS OR TECHNIQUES 39D66 CONDUCT TRAINING CONFERENCES OR BRIEFINGS 39F167 MOUNT OR DISMOUNT MAGNETIC MEDIA 35D73 DEVELOP RESIDENT COURSE OR CAREER DEVELOPMENT COURSE

(CDC) CURRICULUM MATERIALS 35D83 PROCURE TRAINING AIDS, SPACE, OR EQUIPMENT 35F187 REQUEST SYSTEM INFORMATION VIA CONSOLE 32D70 DETERMINE RESIDENT COURSE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS 32E113 PERFORM CALCULATIONS WITHIN A NUMBERING SYSTEM, OTHER

THEN DECIMAL, USING PENCIL AND PAPER 32E114 PERFORM CHARACTER CONVERSIONS USING CHARACTER CONVERSION

CHARTS, SUCH AS ASCII TO BCD OR ASCII TO EBCDIC 29

- A29

Page 103: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A30

SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION PERSONNEL

GROUP SIZE: 17 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: LESS THAN 1%AVERAGE TICF: 136 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 178 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 72

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

E118 REVIEW COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTDOCUMENTATION (CSRD) 82

N381 REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 76

N376 REVIEW COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS INTERFACE ORINTEGRATION REQUIREMENTS 71

A6 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 71N326 ASSIST FUNCTIONAL USERS IN CONCEPTUALIZING OR DEFINING

REQUIREMENTS 65C60 WRITE STAFFF STUDIES, SURVEYS, OR SPECIAL REPORTS 65N323 ANALYZE CURRENT COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

PROCESSING CAPABILITIES 65All PLAN BRIEFINGS 65A3 DETERMINE REQUIREMENTS FOR SPACE, PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT,

OR SUPPLIES 650440 PARTICIPATE IN FINAL COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

REVIEWS FOR USER APPROVAL 65A19 REVIEW COMMUNICATIONS PLANS 59N379 REVIEW DATA SYSTEMS PROJECT PLANS 59E122 REVIEW REQUESTS FOR COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS

SERVICES 59C41 ANALYZE WORKLOAD REQUIREMENTS 590453 REPORT IMPLEMENTATION STATUS OF NEW COMMUNICATIONS-

COMPUTER SYSTEMS TO USING AGENCIES 590422 EVALUATE COMMUNICATIONS-COMPUTER SYSTEMS CHANGE REQUESTS 59P514 REVIEW REQUESTS FOR DEVIATIONS OR WAIVERS FROM STANDARDS

OR SPECIFICATIONS 59N366 PERFORM OR PARTICIPATE IN OPERATIONAL FEASIBILITY STUDIES 59A4 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 59

A30

Page 104: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A31

RESOURCE MANAGERS

GROUP SIZE: 18 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 2%AVERAGE TICF: 79 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 117 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 36

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

R602 REPORT EXCESS OR UNSERVICEABLE TOOLS, SUPPLIES, OREQUIPMENT 92

R587 INVENTORY EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, OR SUPPLIES 89R608 TURN IN EXCESS OR UNSERVICEABLE PARTS, SUPPLIES, OR

EQUIPMENT 89R601 RECEIPT FOR SUPPLIES OR EQUIPMENT 87R578 DISPOSE OF EXCESS OR UNSERVICEABLE TOOLS, SUPPLIES, OR

EQUIPMENT 87R591 MAINTAIN EQUIPMENT CUSTODIAN ACCOUNTS 79R581 ESTABLISH OR UPDATE INVENTORY OR STOCK CONTROL RECORDS 79R603 RESEARCH STATUS OF PURCHASE ORDERS 76R595 PLACE SUPPLIES OR EQUIPMENT IN STORAGE 76R580 ESTABLISH OR MAINTAIN FILES OF HAND RECEIPTS 74R586 INSPECT SUPPLIES OR EQUIPMENT 66R593 PACK OR UNPACK TOOLS, SUPPLIES, OR EQUIPMENT 66R589 LOAD OR UNLOAD TOOLS, SUPPLIES, OR EQUIPMENT 63R575 CONFIRM CONTRACT TERMS, SUCH AS DELIVERY DATE OR QUANTITY 63R585 FURNISH PURCHASING INFORMATION TO VENDORS OR CUSTOMERS 61R599 PREPARE SUPPLY DOCUMENTS, SUCH AS REQUISITIONS, INVOICES,

OR VOUCHERS 61B40 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 58R598 PREPARE PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS, SUCH AS REQUISITIONS,

INVOICES, OR VOUCHERS 58R592 MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACTS 55R588 ISSUE TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, OR SUPPLIES 52

A31

•7 • .• ,, . " .° . _ • .. !• •' • .T •T°• ; :• .• i T • •: i T • ; T -- 'L. "-* " .•- ' -o-, . *-.*- -.,.• ,

Page 105: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

TABLE A32

SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS

GROUP SIZE: 33 PERCENT OF SAMPLE: 2%AVERAGE TICF: 29 MONTHS AVERAGE TAFMS: 40 MONTHSAVERAGE NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED: 20

THE FOLLOWING ARE IN DESCENDING ORDER BY PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

M297 ACCEPT AND CONNECT CALLS ACCORDING TO THEIR PRECEDENCE 97M318 PROCESS TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALLS 94M312 MONITOR HIGH PRECEDENCE OR EMERGENCY CALLS 88M309 MAINTAIN STATUS BOARDS ON LOCATION OF COMMANDERS 82M302 COORDINATE SWITCHBOARD CIRCUIT OR EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS

WITH MAINTENANCE, TECHNICAL CONTROL, OR SUPPORT AGENCIES 76M298 ANSWER SUPERVISORY LIGHTS 67M322 TEST SWITCHBOARD CIRCUITS 67M315 PLACE CALLS BETWEEN SUBSCRIBERS, OTHER THAN SPECIAL

HANDLING CALLS 64Q538 ESCORT VISITORS THROUGH FACILITIES 58EllO MAKE ENTRIES ON SHIFT SUPERVISOR LOGS 55M306 MAINTAIN DD FORMS 1194 (TOLL TICKET) 52M299 BOOK CALLS 52M320 SUPERVISE MINIMIZE CONDITION ACTIONS 48M319 REROUTE CALLS IN EVENT OF CIRCUIT FAILURES 48D64 CONDUCT OJT 48M317 PLACE SPECIAL HANDLING CALLS 42E90 CHECK OPERATIONAL STATUS OF EQUIPMENT 39Q529 AUTHORIZE OR DENY ACCESS TO RESTRICTED OR CONTROLLED

AREAS OR CLASSIFIED MATERIALS 36M303 GIVE CALL PROGRESS INFORMATION 33M310 MAINTAIN SWITCHBOARD INSTRUCTIONS FOR EMERGENCIES, SUCH

AS FIRE, CRASH, OR ATTACK 33

A32

Page 106: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE · 2 im im i afhrl/id 1 im lm/lh i afmpc/dpmrpo1 2 army occupational survey branch i ccaf/ayx defense technical information center 2 hq aac/dpat 3 3 hq afcc/dpato

,Lt�1FD

-w

� �-- w w -w - -� - w - -