united nations development assistance framework - action plan undap nigeria · pdf...

UNITED NATIONS

N I G E R I A“together for higher impact”

, PEACEH &IT PA RF O& GY RT EI SN SU

2014 - 2017

UNDAP NIGERIA

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FRAMEWORK - ACTION PLAN

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FRAMEWORK - ACTION PLAN UNDAP NIGERIA

i i

Contents

Abbreviations & Acronyms

Signature Page

Introduction

Context

Partnership, Values and Principles

Programme Actions and Implementation Strategies

Programme Components

Programme Management and Accountability Arrangements

Resource and Resource Mobilization Strategy

Communication

Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation

Commitments of the Government

Other Provisions

UNDAF Action Plan Result Matrix

Result Area 1: Good Governance

Result Area 2: Social Capital Development

Result Area 3: Equitable & Sustainable Economic Growth

Result Area 4: Human Security & Risk Management

Annex 1: UNDAF Resource Table

Annex 2: UNDAF/P Lead/Co-Leads and Thematic Groups Matrix

Annex 3: Terms of Reference for Steering Committee, UNDAF Results Leads/Co Leads,

Thematic Leads, State Boards and Coordination Mechanisms

Annex 4: UNDAF Action Plan Performance Monitoring Matrix

Annex 5: UNDAF III Four-Year Integrated Research, Monitoring & Evaluation Plan (2014-2017)

Annex 6: UNDAF Output Overview

Table 1: UN & FRN Cooperation Agreements

Table 2: UNDAF/P Joint Programming/Programmes & Collaborative Programming

Table 3: Summary Budgetary Framework UAP Nigeria 2014-2017 by UN Agency

Table 4: Summary Budgetary Framework UAP Nigeria 2014 - 2017 by

UNDAF Thematic Areas

Table 5: Tabular Illustration of the UNDAP '2-Step Approach' Planning Process

Figure 1: UNDAF Outcomes Overview

Figure2: UNDAF/P Governance & Coordination Arrangement

Figure 3: UNDAP M&E Process

Figure 4: UNDAP Review & Planning

Figure 5: UNADF/P Review Calendar

Annexes:

Tables

Figures

iii

viii

2

3

4

6

7

8

14

17

18

25

27

30

30

51

80

100

118

129

131

142

143

144

5

12

15

15

20

8

9

19

21

23

Abbreviations & Acronyms

A

AAN Action Aid Nigeria

ACA Anti Corruption Agencies

ACL African Centre for Leadership

ADR Alternative Dispute resolution

AFP Acute Flaccid Paralysis

AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency

Syndrome

ALGON Association of Local Governments

of Nigeria

ALHIV Adolescents Living with HIV

BCC Behaviour Change Communications

BMGF Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

BoI Bank of Industries

C4D Communication for Development

CAN Christian Association of Nigeria

CATS Community Approach to Sanitation

CATTs Community Anti-Trafficking Teams

CBF Common Budgetary Framework

CBN Central Bank of Nigeria

CBOs Community Based Organisation

CCA Common Country Assessment

CCCM Camp Coordination and Camp Management

CDAs Community Development Associations

CDC Centre for Disease Control

CDF Community Development Fund

CEDAW Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination

against Women

AMIS Agricultural Marketing Information System

ANC/

PMTCT Antenatal care/Prevention of Mother

to Child Transmission

ART Anti-retroviral Therapy

ASC Annual School Census

ATA Agricultural Transformation Agenda

AU African Union

AWPs Annual Work Plans

B

BPP Bureau for Public Procurement

BREDA UNESCO Regional Bureau for Education in

Africa

C

CFC Common Facility Centres

CFS Child Friendly School

CIDA Canadian International Development Agency

CLTS Community led Total Sanitation

CMAM Community Management of Acute Malnutrition

CP Child Protection

CPAPs Country Programme Action Plans

CPI Corruption Perception Index

CPN Child Protection Network

CRPP City Resilient Profiling Programme

CSACEFA Civil Society Action Coalition on Education for

All

CSLA Centre for Social and Legislative Advocacy

D

DaO Delivering as One

DFID Department for International Development

DG Donor Group

DHS Demographic and Health Survey

DMAG Data Management Group

DQA Data Quality Assessment

DRM Disaster Risk Management

DWCP II Decent Work Country Programme II

E

ECCE Early Childhood Care and Education

ECD Early Childhood Development

ECN Energy Commission of Nigeria

EESE Enabling Environment for Sustainable

Enterprises

EFA Education for All

EFCC Economic and Financial Crimes Commission

EMIS Education Management Information System

EPI Expanded Programme on Immunization

EPR Emergency Preparedness and Response

EPRP Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan

EU European Union

EW/ER Early Warning/ Early Recovery

F

F/SMWASD Federal/State Ministry for Women Affairs and

Social Development

FACE Fund Authorization and Certificate of

Expenditures

FAO Food and Agricultural Organization

FCT Federal Capital Territory


i i i

J

F

GAM Global Acute Malnutrition

GBV Gender Based Violence

GCCC Government Counterpart Cash Contributions

GDP Gross Domestic Product

GEF Global Environment facility

GEHR Gender, Equity and Human Rights

GER/NER Gross Enrollment Ratio/Net Enrollment Ratio

FEC Federal Executive Council

FHI Family health International 360

FIDA International Federation of Women Lawyers

FIS Federal Inspection Service

FMARD Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural

Development

FME Federal Ministry of Environment

FME&

SME Federal and State Ministry of Environment

FMEdu Federal Ministry of Education

FMLH&

UD Federal Ministry of Lands Housing and Urban

Development

FMLP Federal Ministry of Labour and Productivity

FMOH Federal Ministry of Health

FMoJ Federal Ministry of Justice

FMoLP Federal Ministry of Labour and Productivity

FMP Federal Ministry of Power

FMSDIGA Federal Ministry of Special Duties and

Inter-Governmental Affairs

FMST Federal Ministry of Science & Technology

FMTI Federal Ministry of Trade and Investment

FMWASD Federal Ministry of Women Affairs and Social

Development

FMWR Federal Ministry of Water Resources

FMYD Federal Ministry Youth Development

FOI Freedom of Information

G

GFCS Global Framework for Climate Services

GLG Good Local Governance

GPRHCS Global Programme on Reproductive Health

Commodity Security

GRB Gender responsive budget

GTU Gender Technical Units

GUG Good Urban Governance

H

HACT Harmonized Approach to Cash Transfer

HCT HIV Counselling and Testing

HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus

HIV/AIDS Human Immuno-deficiency Virus/ Acquired

Immune Deficiency Syndrome

HR Human Resource

I

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

IATT/

TUGAR Inter-Agency Task Team/ Technical Unit on

Governance and Anti-Corruption Reforms

IBE International Bureau of Education

ICPC Independent Corrupt Practices and other

Related Offences Commission

ICSC International Civil Service Commission

ICT Information and Communication Technology

IDCs Industrial Development Centres

IDPs Internally Displaced Persons

IDSR Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response

IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development

IGR Internally Generated Revenue

IHP International Hydrographical Programme

ILO International Labour Organization

IMEP Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

INEC Independent National Electoral Commission

IOM International Organization for Migration

IPAC Inter-Party Advisory Council

IPCR Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution

IQE Integrated Qur'anic Education

ITC International Trade Centre

IYCF Infant and Young Child Feeding

JARs Joint Annual Reviews

JDPC Justice Development and Peace Centre

JMP Joint Monitoring Programme

Jps Joint Programmes

KKAP Knowledge, Attitude and Practice

KMS Knowledge Management System

KOICA Korea International Cooperation Agency


i v

LLAC/Courts Legal Aid Council

LACON Legal Aid Council of Nigeria

LDF Local Development Fund

LEEDS Local Economic Empowerment and

Development Strategy

LGA Local Government Area

LGC Local Government Councils

M & E Monitoring and Evaluation

M/F Male/Female

MAB Man and the Biosphere

MARPs Most at Risk Populations

MDAs Ministries, Departments and Agencies

MDGs Millennium Development Goals

MFCT Ministry of the Federal Capital Territory

MICS Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey

MIS Management Information System

MITI Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment

NAADI Nigerian Agribusiness and Agro-industrial

Development Initiative

NACA National Agency for the Control of AIDS

NACETEM National Center Technology Management

NACTAL Network of NGOs against Child Trafficking,

Labour and Abuse

NAFDAC National Agency for Food and Drug

Administration and Control

NAPTIP National Agency for Prohibition of Traffic in

Persons and other Related Matters

NASS National Assembly

NBS National Bureau of Statistics

NBTE National Board of Technical Education

NC North-central

NCCE National Commission for Colleges of

Education

NCDs Non-Communicable Diseases

NCE National Council on Environment

NCFRMI National Commission for Refugees, Migrants

and Internally Displaced Persons

NCME National Commission for Mass Education

NCNE National Commission for Nomadic Education

NCWS National Council for Women Society

NDC National Defence College

NDHS Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey

NDLEA National Drug Law Enforcement Agency

NFCS National Framework for Climate Services

NE North-East

NECA Nigeria Employers' Consultative Association

NEDS National Education Demographic Survey

LGEA Local Government Education Area

LGEAs Local Government Education Authorities

LIFE Learning Initiative for Entrepreneurs

LLIN Long Lasting Insecticide Net

LMIS Logistics Management Information System

LNFE Literacy and Non-formal Education

LRCN Librarians' REGISTRATION Council of Nigeria

MMLA Monitoring Learning Achievement

MN WHO

MOE Ministry of Education

MOH Ministry of Health

MoLP Ministry of Labour and Productivity

MoRES Monitoring Results for Equity System

MTDP Medium Term Development Plan

MTR Mid-Term Review

MWASD Ministry of Women Affairs and Social

Development

N

NEMA National Emergency Management Agency

NEMIS Nigerian Education Management Information

System

NESREA National Environmental Standards Regulation

Enforcement Agency

NFCS National Framework for Climate Services

NFE Non-formal education

NGOs Non-governmental Organization

NHA National Health Accounts

NHMIS National Management Information System

NHRC National Human Rights Commission

NICS National Immunization Coverage Survey

NIMET Nigeria Meteorological Agency

NIHSA Nigeria Hydrological Services Agency

NIP National Implementation Plan

NIPSS Nigeria Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies

NIREC Nigeria Inter-religious Council

NIRP Nigerian Industrial Revolution Plan

NIS Nigeria Immigration Service

NISER National Institute for Social and Economic

Research

NLC Nigeria Labour Congress

NLN National Library of Nigeria

NLSS National Living Standards Survey

NMEC National Mass Education Commission

NNVS Nigeria National Voluntary Service

NOA National Orientation Agency

NOGALSS Non-Governmental Association for Literacy

Support Services

NOSDRA National Oil Spill Detection Response Agency


v

N

NPC National planning Commission

NPF Nigerian Police Force

NPHCDA National Primary Health Care Development

Agency

NPopC National Population Commission

NQF National Qualification framework

NQI National Quality Infrastructure

NSCDC Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps

NSDS National Strategy for Development of

Statistics

NSHDP National Strategic Health Development Plan

NSP National Strategic Plan on HIV/AIDS

NStCC National Strategy to Combat Corruption

NTI National Teachers' Institute

NW North-West

NWRI National Water Resources Institute

NYNETHA National Youth Network on HIV/AIDS

NYSC National Youth Service Corps

O

OBI Open Budget Index

OCHA-HAT Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian

Affairs

ODA Overseas Development Assistance

ODF Open Defecation Free

ODS Ozone Depleting Substances

OMT Operation Management Team

ONSA Office of National Security Adviser

OSCs One-stop Centers

PDNA Post Disaster Needs Assessment

PEPFAR Presidents Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief

PHCs Primary Health Centres

PIRI Planning and Implementing Routine

Immunization

PLHIV People Living with HIV and AIDS

PMT Programme Management Team

P

PMTCT Preventing Mother to Child Transmission

PMU/

NAPTIN Project Monitoring Unit / National Power

Training Institute of Nigeria

PNC Post-natal Care

PPPs Public-Private Partnerships

PTDF Petroleum Technology Development Fund

R

RATTAWU Radio, Television and Theatre Workers' Union

RC Resident Coordinator

RCO Office of the Resident Coordinator

REDD Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and

Forest Degradation

REMP Renewable Energy Master Plan

RET Renewable Energy Technologies

RMNCH Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child

Health

RMS Resource Mobilization Strategy

RWSA Rural Water Supply and Sanitation

Agencies

SSACAs State Agency for the Control of AIDS

SAME State Agencies for Mass Education

SAS Social Assistance Strategies

SASCP State AIDS and STI Control program

SC Steering Committee

SCIA Supreme Council on Islamic Affairs

SCPZ Staple Crops Processing Zones

SE South-East

SE4ALL Sustainable Energy for All

SEMIS State Education Management Information

System

SESOPs State Education Sector Operational Plans

SESPs State Education Sector Plans

SIEC State Independent Electoral Commissions

SIM School Inspection and Monitoring

SLEAC Simplified Lot Quality Assurance Sampling

Evaluation of Access and Coverage

SMAgric State Ministry of Agriculture

SMART Specific Measurable Achievable Realistic and

Time-bound

SME Subject Matter Expert

SMEDAN Small and Medium Enterprises Development

Agency

SMEdu State Ministry of Education

SMoE State Ministry of Education

SMoED State Ministry of Education

SMOH State Ministry of Health

SMoJ State Ministry of Justice

SMWR State Ministry of Water Resources

SOM Smuggling of Migrants

SON Standard Organisation of Nigeria

SP Social Protection

SPC State Planning Commission

SPF Social Protection Framework


v i

U

S

TB Tuberculosis

TBD To Be Determined

TIP Trafficking in Persons

ToRs Terms of Reference

TUC Trades Union Congress

UAP UNDAF Action Plan

UBEC Universal Basic Education Commission

UHC Universal Health Coverage

UIS UNESCO Institute of Statistics

UNAIDS Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS

UNCG UN Communication Group

UNCT UN Country Team

UNCTAD

STAT United Nations Conference on Trade &

Development Statistics

UNDAF United Nations Development Action

Framework

UNDAF/P United Nations Development Action

Framework/Plan

UNDAP United Nations Development Assistance Plan

UNDG United Nations Development Group

UNDP United Nations Development Programme

UNEP United Nations Environment Programme

UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and

Cultural Organization

UNFPA United Nations Population Fund

SPTWG State PreventionTechnical Working Group

SPX Sub-Contracting and Partnership Exchange

SQUEC Semi-quantitative evaluation of access and

coverage of CMAM

SS South-South

SSAs State Statistical Agencies

SSPs State Strategic Plans on HIV/AIDS

STI Science, Technology and Innovation

SUBEB State Universal Basic Education Board

SW South-West

T

TUGAR Technical Unit on Governance and Anti-

Corruption Reforms

TVET Technical and Vocational Education and

Training

TWGs Technical Working Groups

UNHABITAT United Nations Human Settlements

Programme

UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for

Refugees

UNIC United Nations Information Centres

UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund

UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development

Organization

UNITAR United Nations Institute for Training and

Research

UNOCHA United Nations office for the Coordination of

Humanitarian Affairs

UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

UNOPS United Nations Office for Project Services

UNOSAT UNITAR'S Operational Satellite Applications

Programme

UNSC United Nations Security Council

UNWOMEN United Nations Women

USAID United States Agency for International

Development

USG United States Government

VAC Violence Against Children

VARs Vaccine Arrival Reports

V

VAT Value Added Tax

VAW Violence Against Women

WWANEP West Africa Network for Peace Building

WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene

WB World Bank

WHO World Health Organization

WICBT Women In Cross Border Trade

WMO World Meteorological Organization

WPF World Food Programme

WRAPA Women's Rights Advancement and Protection

Alternative

Y

YEP Youth Empowerment Programme


v i i

Signature Page

The United Nations system and the Federal Government of Nigeria commit to

operationalize a common strategy through the United Nations Development Framework

Action Plan (2014-2017) to enhance the performance and sustainable impact of the joint

response to the development needs of Nigeria.

On behalf of the Government of Nigeria

_________________________________Amb. Bashir Yuguda

Supervising Honourable Minister of NationalPlanning & Deputy Chairman of the

National Planning Commission

On behalf of the UN System in Nigeria

_________________________________Mr. Daouda Toure

UN Resident Coordinator & UNDP Resident Representative

Abuja, 15 May 2014


v i i i

Ms. Louise Setshwaelo

FAO Representative

Mr. Pa Lamin Beyai

UNDP Country Director

Ms. Ratidzai Ndhlovu

UNFPA Representative. a.i

Ms. Hassana Alidou

UNESCO Representative

Ms. Mariam Sissoko

UNODC Representative

Dr. Bilali Camara

UNAIDS Country Director

Mr. Kabir YariUN-HABITAT Programme Manager

Mr. Lawrence Boms

Head, UNITAR

Mr. Oluseyi SoremekunUNIC, OIC

Ms. Sina Chuma-Mkandawire

ILO Director

Ms. Enira Krdzalic

IOM Chief of Mission

Ms. Jean Gough

UNICEF Representative

Ms. Grace Ongile

UN Women Representative

Mr. Patrick Kormawa

UNIDO Representative

Ms. Angele Dikongue-Atangana

UNHCR Representative

Mr. Wirba Alidu

Head, UNOPS

Dr. Rui Gama Vaz

WHO Representative

Mr. Bernard Edward GomezWMO Representative

UN Resident Coordinator on behalf of:

Non-Resident Agencies – UNOCHA, WPF, ITC, UNEP & IAEA


i x

2014 - 2017

UNDAP NIGERIA

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FRAMEWORK - ACTION PLAN

1. Introduction

The United Nations Development Assistance Framework III (2014-2017), signed between

the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the United Nations system on 30 July 2013, is the

strategic common programmatic framework of the UN support for the next four years. The

UNDAF Action Plan (UAP) provides details of how the UN will be working towards attaining

the four key results areas of UNDAF III through its eighteen outcomes and fifty-two outputs.

The four broad result areas of UNDAF, namely, Good Governance; Social Capital

Development; Equitable and Sustainable Economic Growth; and Human Security and Risk

Management derive from and are based on Nigeria's key development priorities as

articulated in Vision 20:2020, its second national implementation plan (2014-2017) and the

Transformational Agenda of the current administration; all of which are closely aligned with

the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

Based on lessons learnt during the implementation of UNDAFs I & II, from 2002-2006 and

2009-2013, respectively, the reform agenda set by UN member states as well as the

changes in national and global development context, the UN system in Nigeria is seeking

conformity under the 'Delivering as One' ( DaO) modality as a self-starter country driven by

one programme. The relatively positive piloting experience of the DaO approach in 6+1

states (Lagos, Akwa Ibom, Benue, Kaduna, Imo, Adamawa and the Federal Capital

Territory) in Nigeria under UNDAF II and the expressed demands from many states for

similar joint UN implementation approach, are major impetus for the UN Country Team

(UNCT) to scale up the coverage and depth of development assistance in UNDAF III. The

DaO approach enables the UN system to deliver measurable results against the defined

development agenda of Nigeria and to enhance UN coherence, accountability and

effectiveness in project and programme delivery. The self-starter DaO is also a strategic

choice by the UN system in Nigeria. Its aim is to reposition the UN in a lower middle income

environment with minimal ODA and to further advance the principles of Paris Declaration on

Aid effectiveness, the Accra Agenda for Action and the Busan Declarations on development

effectiveness.

The UAP also offers a great opportunity for the UN system in Nigeria within the

accountability frameworks and existing legal agreements between the UN system agencies

and the Government of Nigeria. The UAP, which brings together the combined work of

resident and non-resident UN agencies in Nigeria, is an important step towards identifying

opportunities for joint programming and joint programme implementation in Nigeria. The

Action plan also provides details on resources required, available resources, resource gaps

and need for additional resource mobilization.


2

The Action Plan is a critical tool to guide increased efficiencies and effectiveness of the UN

programme interventions in Nigeria. It is a product of elaborate consultations and decisions

of the UNCT with the support of Government and other key partners. As a programme action

plan, it replaces the individual Country Programme Action Plans (CPAPs) of UNICEF,

UNFPA and UNDP, and includes the main programme results and implementation

strategies of the eighteen (plus five non-resident) participating UN agencies, funds and

programmes in UNDAF III. The complete achievement of the UNDAF strategic intent,

outcomes and outputs is dependent on the commitment to and ownership of the UAP by the

Government and the UN system. The strategic line activities presented in the UAP will

complement actions of Government and other partners towards achieving development

priorities, goals and objectives during the UNDAF III cycle in Nigeria.

The Federal Republic of Nigeria operates a three-tier democratic federal system of

government made up of (i) a federal government; (ii) 36 states and a Federal Capital

Territory (FCT) in Abuja; and (iii) 774 local government areas. All three tiers of government

are autonomous entities with regards to governance and resource mobilization functions.

1The population of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is projected as 171 million with an annual

growth rate of 3.2 per cent, which provides a potential for the population to double by

2035.The population has a young population base aged 0 - 15 years (45 per cent) and 15 to

34 years (30 per cent); and with women accounting for 49 per cent of the total population.

The country's economic outlook is promising with a steady growth of 7- 8 per cent for the

period 2010 – 2015 with agriculture contributing about 40 per cent to the Gross Domestic

Product (GDP) and over 60 per cent to employment. Other sectoral contributors to GDP are

wholesale and retail trade (19 per cent); and oil and natural gas (15 per cent). Oil and gas

revenues account for over 90 per cent of export earnings and 80 per cent of total

government revenue. Manufacturing remains poorly developed, contributing less than 5 per 2cent to GDP in 2011.

Despite this economic outlook, national wealth and ranking as the seventh leading oil-3

producing country in the world, its HDI of 0.459 ranks it 156th out of 187 countries while its 4Gini Coefficient is on the increase from 0.4296 in 2004 to 0.4470 in 2010. Similarly, the rate

of urbanization is high (about 3.8 per cent) with more than 50 per cent of the total population

2. Context

1National Population Commission, 2012 projections2National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) Review of the Nigerian Economy 2011 32011 Human Development Report4Nigeria Common Country Assessment (CCA), UNCT, 2012


3

currently living in urban areas with significant implications for socio-economic development.

Nigeria is reported as not being on track towards meeting most of the MDGs by 2015 as

reflected in UNDAF III with “medium” probability ranking across all MDG goals and targets.

The current human capital development indices across education, water, sanitation, food

security, health, HIV & AIDS and social cohesion reflect the capacity of institutions, status of

relationships and impact of norms which currently affect the quality of life and social

interactions. Significant disparities exist within national aggregate scores, human

development indices and progress towards the MDGs across geographic locations,

population groups, as well as gender and wealth quintiles.

The dimension of crises, conflicts and impacts of climate change in the country is changing

with rising political, religious, inter-communal violence and consequences of climate change 5

which affect large numbers of the country's population. These occurrences mask deeper

underlying issues of constrained political engagement and participation; marginalization of

different segments of the population; ineffective justice sector, governance deficits and weak

accountability mechanisms; weak preparedness and response systems; inequitable

distribution of resources and slow progress toward attaining fundamental human rights.

These pose significant challenges to the well-being of citizens and undermine the ability of

government to deliver democratic dividends.

In support of government's efforts at addressing these issues, the UN system in Nigeria will,

through the UNDAF III, leverage its comparative advantages to achieve clear programmatic

impact in the country, optimize resource utilization, and enhance its position as a neutral

convener and broker of equitable development while supporting improved aid coordination

in the country.

The UNDAF Action Plan demonstrates the commitment of the UN system to work together in

a more coherent manner under the self-starter 'delivering as one', to ensure that

development assistance will translate into higher impact and enhance development

effectiveness for the government and people of Nigeria. The signing of UNDAF III on 30 July

2013 reinforces the strong partnership between Government and the UN system in support

of national development priorities. The UN system's overarching engagement in Nigeria will

be guided by its determination to work coherently, effectively and efficiently to help Nigeria

achieve its national development priorities, the Millennium Development Goals and other

3. Partnerships, Values and Principles

52012 Human Rights Watch Report Nigeria Country Profile.


4

internationally agreed treaties, obligations and development goals, as well as to advance

the principles of the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, the Accra Agenda for Action and

the Busan Declarations on development effectiveness.

The main programming principles underlying development assistance provided by the

United Nations System in Nigeria through UNDAF III are the use of human-rights-based

approach, promoting environmental sustainability, advancing gender equality, fostering

capacity development and ensuring results-based management. The UN system will

equally use lessons learned from its past projects and programmes to strengthen upstream

policy and strategy development, transfer of skills and technology, and provide support for

the implementation of innovative downstream programmes.

The UAP defines the mutual cooperation and agreement between the Government of

Federal Republic of Nigeria and the UN system for the period 2014-2017. Therefore, the

UAP, upon being signed by each UN agency, fund and programme, be read, interpreted,

and implemented in accordance with and in manner that is consistent with the basic

agreement between such UN system agency, fund and programme and the Host

Government. Below is the table detailing the basic country agreement of UN agencies funds

and programmes serving as the legal basis for the relationship between the Federal

Government and each of the UN organizations in Nigeria. Whereas the Government of the

Federal Republic of Nigeria (hereinafter referred to as 'the Government') has entered into

the following:

Table 1: UN & FRN Cooperation Agreements

UN Agency Mechanism/Instrument Date

1. UNDP: UNDAP Agencies covered by

UNDP Country Agreement (UN

Women, UNAIDS, UN-HABITAT,

UNITAR,UNODC,UNOPS, IFAD,

UNIC)

Standard Basic Assistance Agreement 1988

2. FAO Basic Cooperation Agreement 1978

3. ILO Country Host Agreement 1959

4. UNFPA Standard Basic Assistance Agreement 2008

5. UNHCR Basic Cooperation Agreement 1982

6. UNICEF Basic Cooperation Agreement 1997

7. UNIDO Basic Cooperation Agreement 1992

8. WHO Basic Agreement 1962

9. IOM Cooperation Agreement 2002

UNESCO Agreement under review.


5

The Resident UN organizations and the Non-Resident agencies (UNOCHA, WFP, UNEP,

IAEA, ITC) in Table 1 will collaborate to achieve the UNDAF III results. The Resident

Coordinator and the UNCT will be collectively accountable for the UNDAF III results in

Nigeria while delegating specific programme accountability to the agencies based on their

individual agreements. The UAP will be implemented in collaboration with partners in

government, including line ministries, departments and agencies, the national and state

assemblies, the judiciary and independent commissions, civil society organizations and the

private sector. The partnership will also extend to international development partners such

as the Bretton Woods Institutions, regional, international financial organizations and the 6

Country Assistance Framework (CAF) partners in Nigeria to ensure that the UN system's

support is aligned and harmonized for greater development effectiveness.

The development assistance strategies in UNDAF III (2014-2017) will respond to strategic

national priorities articulated in the second National Implementation Plan of Nigeria's Vision

20:2020 (NV 20: 2020), which is the country's long-term development plan that envisages

Nigeria becoming one of the world's largest 20 economies by 2020, with a specific GDP 7

target of US$ 900 billion and a per capita income target of US$ 4,000 by that year.

The UNDAF III Outcomes and Outputs serve as core components of the UAP matrix, which

reflect the aspirations of UN agencies and key partners from Government at federal and

state levels, as well as the civil society organizations. To ensure full alignment of individual

agencies' programmes to the UNDAF, the UAP reflects individual agencies' outputs

contributing to the achievement of UNDAF Outputs. The UAP articulates by agency

outputs, the specific indicators, baselines, targets and means of verification, as well as

collaborating partners.

The main objective of the UAP, therefore, is to articulate the programme modalities of how

the UN system in Nigeria will support government to address key challenges that will trigger

critical sustainable development in governance; accountability, economic growth,

4. Programme Action and Implementation Strategies

UN Programming Process and Approaches

6CAF is a consultative process and policy dialogue instrument supporting the establishment of a platform for Nigeria's strong, socially and regionally inclusive, sustained growth; implemented through thematic/sector donor coordination groups. It aims to increase and reinforce development results by offering a common strategic partner approach to: (i) support country's development objectives and priorities; (ii) achieve greater harmonization of interventions; and (iii) avoid duplication of tasks. CAF's priority areas are elaborated separately by each CAF partners and reflected in their respective country programmes and strategies. These are within the overall framework of the CAF and are mutually reinforcing across the CAF agencies. CAF partners in Nigeria are African Development Bank, Agence Francaise de Development, Canadian International Development Agency, Department for International Development, UK, Embassy of Japan, Japan International Cooperation Agency, Embassy of the Republic of China, European Union, High Commission of India, International Monetary Fund, United States Agency for International Development, United Nations system and the World Bank.7 Nigeria's Vision 20: 2020 Economic Transformation Blueprint


6

productivity and employment; social inclusion and empowerment; quality and equitable

social service delivery (health, education, water, sanitation, hygiene, nutrition, food

security); human security, risks of conflict and natural disasters; as well as environment,

climate change and disaster risk reduction.

The UN system in Nigeria will, through the UAP programming modalities, support

institutional and human capacity development, evidence-based design and implementation

of policies and strategies, as well as innovative service delivery approaches and use of

appropriate technologies. Independent impact evaluations, analytical studies and

appraisals will also be conducted to generate evidence and new knowledge needed to

identify high-risk population groups for targeted and priority actions; and assist public and

private institutions to strengthen routine monitoring and evaluation systems.

Emphasis will be placed on joint programming and flagship projects in identified states and

LGAs using an equity-based approach which concentrates on the most vulnerable

populations. The effectiveness of the joint UN programmes and collaborative programme

activities will be achieved by ensuring that such programmes respond to priorities expressed

in state development plans as a pre-requisite for programme interventions.

The UAP follows the harmonized cycles of the UNDP, UNFPA and UNICEF Country

Programmes which apply the 2014-2017 UNDAF III timeframe. Other UN agencies and

funds that are guided by annual or bi-annual country programme cycles will go through

several programming cycles during the period of UNDAF implementation. The provisions of

the UAP will be implemented through the programmes and projects of individual UN

agencies as agreed to by partner organizations. UN agencies Annual Work Plans (AWPs)

and individual project documents will be derived from the UNDAF III and agency outputs

identified in the UAP.

The four UNDAF III results areas of: (i) Good governance; (ii) Social capital development; (iii)

Sustainable and equitable economic growth; and (iv) Human security and risk management,

serve as the broad strategic results areas. With 18 Outcomes and 52 Outputs, the UNDAF III

and UAP Results Framework constitutes the contribution of UNDAF III to national priorities

for 2014-2017 (see Annex 7) . Figure 1 illustrates the key outcomes for UNDAF III.

5. Programme Components


7

Figure 1: UNDAF Outcomes Overview

6. Programme Management and Accountability Arrangement

Governance

The UNDAF and its Action Plan will be nationally executed under the overall co-ordination of

National Planning Commission (NPC) as the Government Coordinating Authority for the UN

and development Partners in Nigeria. Programme execution in the states will be under the

state UNDAF Governing Boards to be established. Figure 2 illustrates the coordination

mechanisms for the implementation of UNDAF/P in Nigeria.


8

Figure 2: UNDAF/P Governance & Coordination Arrangement

An UNDAF Steering Committee (SC), co-chaired by the Minister, National Planning

Commission, and the UN Resident Coordinator, with key partner ministries and UNCT

(participating on rotational basis) as members shall be in place to improve coordination and

accountability of UNDAF partners. The SC will be responsible for providing overall strategic

policy guidance and direction on the implementation of UNDAF III (Annex 3). Specific

guidelines and frameworks for interventions will aim at increasing efficiency and

effectiveness, limiting overlaps and spurring synergies that reduce transactional costs for all

partners.

The UNCT, under the leadership of the RC, will be responsible for the UNDAF/P direction,

planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation in line with UNCT code of conduct,

DaO principles, the recommendations of the SC and the UN global commitments. The RC

and UNCT will also be responsible for developing and implementing a Resource


9

Mobilization Strategy (RMS) and coordinating the preparation and submission of a One 8Fund allocation proposal to the SC in accordance with Allocation Criteria ToRs.

The Programme Management Team (PMT), comprising UN agencies' programme heads

and chaired by a UNCT Member, as a technical inter-agency programmatic body will

continue its pivotal role of coordinating UN programmes, providing guidance to UNDAF

results/outcome groups for and on behalf of the UNCT during the UNDAF cycle.

The Operations Management Team (OMT), made up of key operations technical staff from

resident agencies and with support from UN Common Services, will lead the business-

efficiency model for effective delivery of the UNDAF/P, implementation of HACT, as well as

lead the planned move from Common Premises to One Office. The OMT, under the

guidance of the UNCT, will deepen the excellent UN House experience focusing on

measurable efficiency that translates to actual cost-savings for the UN family, partners and

government. The OMT will leverage the common premises experience in selected states

where the model is programmatically desirable and financially feasible for UNDAF III cycle.

The UN M&E Group (DMAG), made up of technical monitoring and evaluation experts

and/or focal persons at agency level, will be robustly revamped and made responsible for

effective and timely support for evidence-based planning, monitoring and evaluation of the

UNDAP under the overall direction of the PMT. The Group will also undertake quality

assurance activities and provide technical support to the thematic and result groups for

monitoring and reporting of results, including undertaking joint field visits. Working closely

with the RCO the DMAG will coordinate the processes of UNDAF annual reviews,

preparation of progress reports, use of management Devinfo and IMEP implementation, all

of which will be linked to the national M&E system at the NPC.

Six UNDAP thematic groups and one cross-cutting group has been established and

synchronized with the overall lead agencies for the four main Results Areas of the UNDAF

III. This will ensure consistency, continuity and accountability for the delivery of the

UNDAF/P results (Annex 2). The UNDAF lead agencies and the thematic groups are

responsible for monitoring the implementation of the UAP. To operationalize the working

modalities of these groups, sub-task teams and working groups would be established as

and when necessary by the lead agencies. Where more than one agency is supporting an

output, a division of responsibility will be determined to avoid overlap and duplication, and

thus, hold individual UN agencies accountable for contributions and commitments to the

attainment of specific strategic activities and results. The UNDAP thematic group leads will

8UNCT plans to set up One Fund and/or Common Budgetary Framework to reinforce joint UN programmes and assist in meeting the resource gaps for UNDAP through the RMS. The RC will lead joint resource mobilization efforts targeting increased domestic resources from the government of Nigeria and in-country donors, foundations and the private sector.


10

seamlessly interface with the national sector thematic coordination mechanisms and/or the

proposed Country Assistance Framework national thematic groups and report to the UNCT

through the results area leads and Programme Management Team. Effective and efficient

coordination and harmonization of UN common position under each thematic group is

imperative. Thus, prior consultations and communication among members of each

thematic group are crucial towards presenting the UN as a unified entity at national

thematic group deliberations.

To operationalize the UAP within the three-tier government structure in Nigeria, results will

be implemented and achieved through specific activities at state level, and where more

than one UN agency is providing assistance in a particular state, the AWP between the UN

and the state will follow the DaO modality. The TORs of the UNDAF/P Leads/thematic

Groups and list of agencies serving as leads/co-leads are presented in Annex 3.

The UNCG will be responsible for the entire communication architecture of the UAP

interfacing with UN staff, PMT, UNCT and UNDAF IPs. The Office of the Resident

Coordinator (RCO) will support the RC and the UNCT in managing the implementation of

the UNDAF/P by coordinating with the thematic groups, lead/co-lead agencies, resident

and non-resident UN agencies, the entire UN coordination mechanisms and with the NPC

and other MDAs for effective and efficient linkages to deliver the planned results. The entry

point of the UN system into the CAF will be through the SC and the relevant thematic groups

under the UNDAF/P. All programme activities will be implemented by Government

ministries, departments and agencies, NGOs, INGOs and UN agencies. In close

collaboration with the NPC, the RCO will also act as the secretariat for the UNDAF Steering

Committee.

The UNDAF Action Plan will be made operational through the development of annual work

plans (AWPs) and/or project documents which describe the specific results to be achieved.

It will also form an agreement between the UN system agencies and each implementing

partner on the use of resources. To the extent possible, the UN agencies and partners will

use the minimum documents necessary, namely, the signed UNDAF Action Plan and

signed annual work plans (AWPs) to implement programme initiatives. However, as

necessary and appropriate, project documents can be prepared using, inter alia, the

relevant text from the UNDAF Action Plan and annual work plans (AWPs).

Within the four UNDAF/P result areas, the UNCT has identified some areas for joint

programme/programming interventions and flagship projects by two or more UN agencies,

Annual Work Plans and Project Documents

Joint Programmes and Collaborative Programming


11

which will increase the relevance and impact of UN development assistance, while, at the

same time, reducing the transaction costs for external partners in working with the UN. In

addition, the UNCT has noted that while JPs will substantially increase the effectiveness of

the UNDAF 2014-2017, other forms of collaborative programming between two or more UN

agencies would be part of a spectrum of tools to respond to different needs and opportunities

for joint UN collaboration. The use of the government initiated framework which brings

together relevant UN agencies to jointly tackle developmental issues will be one of the

bases for such collaborative programming under the UNDAF/P.

Table 2 gives an overview of the areas that have been considered for joint

programmes/programming and collaborative programming under the UNDAF/P, as well as

the corresponding programming modalities and participating UN agencies.

Table 2: UNDAF/P Joint Programming/Programmes & Collaborative Programming

UNDAF III

Result Areas

Programme

modality/Theme

Lead Agency (Proposed)

Other Participating Agencies

Good Governance

Election Support UNDP UN WOMEN, UNODC

ADR- Justice Sector UNODC UNHCR, UNICEF, UNDP,UNWOMEN

Evidence-Based Planning Support/Data for Development ( Cross-Cutting)

UNDP& UNFPA UNODC, UNITAR, UNICEF, UN WOMEN, ILO, WHO, FAO, UNHCR, UNOPS, UNESCO, IOM, IFAD, HABITAT

Social capital development

Education UNICEF UNESCO, UNHCR, UNOPS

Health

WHO

(UNH4 members) UNFPA, UNICEF, UNHCR

HIV&AIDS

UNAIDS

(JUNTA Members) UNICEF, UNFPA,WHO, UNDP,UNODC,ILO,UNHCR,

Social Protection

UNICEF

ILO, UNODC, UNDP, UNHCR,WHO,UNWOMEN,WHO, UNFPA

Equitable &Sustainable Economic Growth

Energy

UNIDO

UNDP, UNWOMEN, UNOPS,

Youth Employment/Enter-prise Development

ILO

UNDP.IFAD,UNITAR, UNOPS,UNFPA,UNIDO,UN WOMEN

Value Chain Commodities

FAO

ILO, UNIDO,UNDP

Human Security & Risk Management

NEMA/SEMA Capacity Support

UNDP & UNHCR

IOM , UNICEF WMO, UNOCHA

Data-Base and policy support

UNODC

UNDP,

IOM, UNHCR,UNICEF, WHO, FAO,

Humanitarian Response

RC’s Office

(OCHA-HAT)

All UN Agencies via the EPRWG

Development and Management of Joint Programmes

Under UNDAF II which ended in 2013, the UN piloted a 'loose' joint programme in 6 states +1

(Lagos, Akwa Ibom, Benue, Kaduna, Imo, Adamawa and the Federal Capital Territory)

under the DaO approach. While appreciable progress was recorded in some states, the


12

experiences in others were very challenging. The lessons learned and the huge collective

benefits accrued to State Governments and the UN system attracted the attention of many

other states; hence the UN system will scale-up joint programming and/or joint

programmes across the federation under this programming cycle.

All JPs under this programme cycle will be developed and signed by the relevant partners

and the UN agencies, and in full compliance with the provisions and requirements of the

UNDG JP guidelines to ensure consistency and linkages with the overall UNDAF/P

coordination mechanism and results.

All cash transfers to an Implementing Partner will be based on the annual work plans

(AWPs) agreed between the Implementing Partner and the UN system agencies. Cash

transfers for activities detailed in annual work plans (AWPs) can be made by the UN system

agencies using the following modalities:

1. Cash transferred directly to the Implementing Partner:

a. Prior to the start of activities (direct cash transfer), or

b. After activities have been completed (reimbursement);

2. Direct payment to vendors or third parties for obligations incurred by the

Implementing Partners on the basis of requests signed by the designated official of

the Implementing Partner;

3. Direct payments to vendors or third parties for obligations incurred by UN system

agencies in support of activities agreed with Implementing Partners.

Direct cash transfers shall be requested and released for programme implementation

periods not exceeding three months. Reimbursements of previously authorized

expenditures shall be requested and released quarterly or after the completion of activities.

The UN system agencies shall not be obligated to reimburse expenditure made by the

Implementing Partner over and above the authorized amounts.

Following the completion of any activity, any balance of funds shall be refunded or

programmed by mutual agreement between the Implementing Partner and the UN system

agencies.

Cash transfer modalities, the size of disbursements, the scope and frequency of assurance

Cash Transfers


13

activities may depend on the findings of a review of the public financial management

capacity in the case of a Government Implementing Partner, and of an assessment of the

financial management capacity of the non-UN Implementing Partner. A qualified

consultant, such as a public accounting firm, selected by the UN system agencies may

conduct such an assessment, in which the Implementing Partner shall participate. The

Implementing Partner may participate in the selection of the consultant.

Cash transfer modalities, the size of disbursements, and the scope and frequency of

assurance activities may be revised in the course of programme implementation based on

the findings of programme monitoring, expenditure monitoring and reporting, as well as

audits.

In the spirit of DaO, the UN agencies, funds and programmes will coherently explore all

avenues and take steps to mobilize additional resources to meet the funding gaps identified

in the Common Budgetary Framework (CBF). The CBF presented in this document is the

combination of agencies' core and non-core resources based on the financial modality and

procedure peculiar to agencies. The UN system in Nigeria would establish a One Fund as an

instrument for mobilizing resources to fund the resource gaps over the UNDAF/P cycle. In

this respect, a joint resource mobilization strategy to assist the RC's lead efforts in targeting

increased domestic resources from the government of Nigeria and in-country donors,

foundations and the private sector will be agreed jointly by the UNCT. With one CBF

developed for the UNDAP, partners and stakeholders will, at a glance, view the available

and funding gaps for specific result areas to be supported by various donors/government.

The UAP will require an estimated total of USD 1,290,633,992 for its entire implementation

from 2014-2017. This estimate consists of core/regular resources but due to differences in

agencies' financial procedures and systems, some agencies make no distinction of

core/regular resources. As much as 71 per cent of this budget (about USD 920,102,957)

will come from regular resources while the remaining USD 370,531,035 will be mobilized.

Also, out of the four Results Areas, the Social Capital Development Result Area accounts for

60 per cent of the entire budget, Good Governance 18 per cent, Equitable and Sustainable

Economic Growth 13 per cent and Human Security and Risk Management 9 per cent.

Tables 3 and 4 provide the summary of resource contributions and gaps by agencies, as well

as the resource requirement and funding gap in each Result Area (Thematic). The detailed

analyses of the seven thematic areas, including the cross-cutting ones and their funding

6. Resource and Resource Mobilization Strategy

Common Budgetary Framework for UAP


14

Result Area 1: Good Governance & Rule of Law

194,395,710 112,490,710 0 81,905,000

Result Area 2: Social Capital Development - Education

101,480,000 71,310,000 0 30,170,000

gaps are shown in Annex I.

Table 3: Summary Budgetary Framework UAP Nigeria 2014-2017 by UN Agency

S/N AGENCY Indic. Res.

Req. UNDAF Resources Contributions UAP

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

1 FAO 57,797,000 12,253,990 0 45,543,010

2 IFAD 76,300,000 76,300,000 0 0

3 ILO 16,520,000 16,520,000 0 0

4 UNAIDS 1,450,000 1,450,000 0 0

5 UNDP 161,188,000 25,188,000 0 136,000,000

6 UNESCO 6,977,500 6,600,000 0 377,500

7 UNFPA 77,000,000 75,000,000 0 2,000,000

8 UNHABITAT 2,080,000 460,000 0 1,620,000

9 UNHCR 5,995,000 2,800,000 0 3,195,000

10 UNICEF 462,800,000 334,116,975 0 128,683,025

11 UNIDO 48,700,000 30,600,000 0 18,100,000

12 UNWOMEN 7,627,980 7,627,980 0 0

13 UNITAR 5,312,500 4,250,000 0 1,062,500

14 UNODC 125,684,244 124,404,244 0 1,280,000

15 WHO 193,227,760 193,227,760 0 0

16 IOM 23,124,008 8,624,008 0 14,500,000

17 UNOPS 18,850,000 680,000 0 18,170,000

Total 1,290,633,992 920,102,957 0 370,531,035

The 18 agencies, funds and programmes and the five Non-Resident agencies will contribute

to, and participate in, the implementation of the UAP, with three agencies (UNICEF, UNODC

and WHO) being the largest contributors with about 71 per cent of the entire resource outlay.

The indicated resources exclude emergency/humanitarian resources that would be

mobilized during the UNDAF/P cycle.

Table 4: Summary Budgetary Framework UAP Nigeria 2014 - 2017 by UNDAF

Thematic Areas

Result Area Indic. Res. Req. UNDAF

Resources Contributions to UNDAF Plan by

UN agencies in Nigeria

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap


15

Result Area 3: Social Capital Development- Health

537,804,067 450,851,042 0 86,953,025

Result Area 4: Social Capital Development - Social Protection

36,590,862 27,595,862 0 8,995,000

Result Area 5: Equitable and Sustainable Economic Development

190,430,000 122,593,000 0 67,837,000

Result Area 6: Human Security and Risk Management

147,496,648 82,343,138 0 65,153,510

Result Area 7: *Cross-Cutting 82,436,705 52,919,205 0 29,517,500

TOTAL 1,290,633,992 920,102,957 0 370,531,035

*Cross-Cutting: Human Rights & Gender Equality, Evidence Based decision making, Youth, Data for development, HIV/AIDS

Types of Support

Harmonized Approach to Cash Transfer (HACT)

The UN system agencies will provide support for the development and implementation of

activities within the UNDAF Action Plan, which may include technical support, cash

assistance, supplies, commodities and equipment, procurement services, transport, funds

for advocacy, research and studies, consultancies, programme development, monitoring

and evaluation, training activities and staff support. Part of the UN system agencies' support

may be provided to non-governmental organizations and civil society groups as agreed

within the framework of the annual work plans (AWPs) and project documents.

Additional support may include granting access to UN organization-managed global

information systems, the network of UN agencies' country offices and specialized

information systems, including rosters of consultants and providers of development

services, and access to the support provided by the network of UN Specialized Agencies,

Funds and Programmes. The UN system agencies shall appoint staff and consultants for

programme development, programme support, technical assistance, as well as monitoring

and evaluation activities. Subject to annual reviews and progress in the implementation of

the programme, the UN system agencies' funds are distributed by calendar year and in

accordance with the UNDAF Action Plan. These budgets will be reviewed and further

detailed in the annual work plans (AWPs) and project documents. By mutual consent

between the Government and the UN system agencies, funds not earmarked by donors to

the UN system agencies for specific activities may be re-allocated to other programmatically

equally worthwhile activities.

In case of direct cash transfer or reimbursement, the UN system agencies shall notify the

Implementing Partner of the amount approved by the UN system agencies and shall


16

disburse funds to the Implementing Partner in 10 working days.

In case of direct payment to vendors or third parties for obligations incurred by the

Implementing Partners on the basis of requests signed by the designated official of the

Implementing Partner, or to vendors or third parties for obligations incurred by the UN

system agencies in support of activities agreed with Implementing Partners, the UN

agencies shall proceed with the payment within five working days.

The UN system agencies shall not have any direct liability under the contractual

arrangements concluded between the Implementing Partner and a third party vendor.

Where the UN system agencies and other UN system agency provide cash to the same

Implementing Partner, programme monitoring, financial monitoring and auditing will be

undertaken jointly or coordinated with the UN system agencies.

The One Fund and the complimentary common budgetary framework are acclaimed by

many DaO pilot and self-starter countries to be a critical stimulus for UN coherence at

country level. The UNDAF/P will be financed via multiply sources, including the

establishment of a One Fund. The modalities and the ToRs for One Fund in line with the

UNDG guidelines and UNCT Nigeria's code of conduct will be explored and established

during the UNDAF/P cycle. The SC and UNCT will play a pivotal role in the formulation,

implementation and management of the One Fund leveraging on its membership in the CAF

process.

The strategic communication thrust of the UN system under UNDAF/P (2014-2017) cycle

will hinge on robust harmonized internal and external communication of UN system in

Nigeria through One Voice. Unified communication will target raising public awareness and

increasing partners' engagement on key milestones and priority areas of UNDAF by

improving the visibility of the UN interventions and results in the areas of good governance,

social capital development, equitable and sustainable economic growth and human security

and risk management.

The UN Communication Group (UNCG), an inter-agency body composed of all

communication experts of the UN agencies, funds and programmes in Nigeria, is being

revamped to play a lead role in the implementation of the UNDAF/P. The UNCT agreed to

One Fund

7. Communication


17

appoint a Head of Agency to chair the Group with technical and secretariat support from

UNIC. The UNCG will liaise with the thematic groups through the PMT with the support of the

RCO to package information for the UNCT's clearance and release to stakeholders. The

UNCG will also develop relevant platforms and create spaces for debate, knowledge

sharing and partnership consolidation with stakeholders and the media. Dissemination of

information on UNDAP to wider audiences through the mass media, social media, traditional

media and other popular communication channels will be undertaken by the UNCG; while

also facilitating partners' engagement through transparent consultative processes that elicit

ownership and firm commitment among target stakeholders.

For maximum share of voice and space, alliances would be established with the media to

regularly cover development stories/issues on UNDAF/P and air news/video documentaries

from the beneficiary perspectives. Best practices will be promoted through effective

deployment of a wide range of media and advocacy tools (Factsheets, Brochures,

DVD/VCD, Information Notes, etc.) for optimal impact. In addition to organizing media field

visits and periodic media briefing sessions, key global observances and launch of Global

Reports, as well as newsletters and websites would also serve as complementary platforms

to raise awareness and link the advocacy efforts of the UN, the civil society and the

government.

To ensure strategic communications, the UNCG will also seek to institute an efficient

Knowledge Management System (KMS) that enhances information access, sharing and

retrieval among Agencies of the UN. The RCO will support the UNCG and UNIC to create a

central database to archive all agencies' repository on UNDAP activities. The UNCG and the

RCO will encapsulate all the above dimensions into a communication strategic document to

further articulate a unified voice of the UN through the RC/UNCT.

In line with the need to foster government ownership of UN interventions in the country, the

design of the new programming cycle of the UNDAF, which was led by Government, is

maximally aligned to the national systems and the Vision 20:2020 strategy document. The

UN will work in partnership with the relevant Government MDAs to operationalize the

UNDAF Action Plan through putting in place structures that support effective Planning,

Monitoring and Evaluation of all interventions and activities proposed in this document. As

much as possible, the M&E processes of the UNDAF Action Plan will ride on existing

systems of the Government and the UN System in Nigeria. Overall Monitoring and

Evaluation will be kept simple and effective, focusing mainly on the annual targets of the

8. Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation


18

result indicators at the outcome and output levels as specified in the UNDAF Results Matrix

and the Performance Monitoring matrix of the UNDAF Action Plan. The M&E process is

presented in Figure 3.

Figure 3: UNDAP M&E Process

UNDAF AP development; AWP development and advancement of funds to Implementing partners

UNDAP mid-year and annual review processes and

deliberate work on incorporation of inputs into

government budgetary work to ensure inclusion

in priorities frame

Consolidation of performances in conjunction with Govt. & Reporting as reflected in relevant guidance document

Baseline assessment for

UNDAP indicators, field

monitoring visits mid-term

review & end-line evaluation

Annual Planning Process

To improve efficiency and streamline the support the UN is providing to the Government in

its intervention areas, the annual planning process of the UNDAF Action Plan will, as much

as possible, follow government's planning and budgeting processes. The UNDAP Mid-Year

Review process would feed into the commencement of the Government Annual Planning


19

process when the government ministries are developing their yearly plans and budgets

(Jun-July). Joint AWPs (for the subsequent year) would then be developed with the

MDA/States at a mutually agreed date (preferably before the start of the year of

implementation) but at a time when the funds commitment for the ministries/states are

already clear, ensuring that duplications are avoided as much as possible and that funding

streams are as synergistic as possible.

This would ensure that the UN System is able to provide high-level strategic technical and

financial support to government in its planning and budgetary processes, while also

earmarking resources for intervention programmes within government's priority areas. The

process will ensure that the UNDAP planning process is in line with the national planning

cycle while, at the same time, ensuring that the UN is able to develop joint signed plans with

the respective ministries on the basis of which funds to meet government funding gaps will

be released from the UN system. In line with strengthening the HACT process of the UN, all

agencies using the HACT approach and/or similar approaches, will work together to prepare

a joint AWP with each Implementing Partner to facilitate financial resource transfers. Table 5

summarizes this planning process.

Table 5: Tabular Illustration of the UNDAP '2-Step Approach' Planning Process

Calendar Period

Event and Intent Approach Design

June/July UNDAF midyear review by UNDAF Thematic groups with national MDAs/IPs:

Information and data on UNDAP performance at the mid-year conducted jointly with Government

Indicative activities for each Ministry for the next year

in order to meet government's budget cycle

Indicative Budget for each Ministry for the next year

Jointly per Theme group

Harmonized format with clear links to Government and UNDAF Outputs

Transfer of the agreed information into the annual Government and UN budget frameworks

UNDAP Planning around outputs/outcomes Nov

a. Update agency budget in annual CBF around outputs

a. Jointly per outcome/ theme

a. Format of UN CBFoutcome

b. Joint UN-IP WP per programme at state/federal level

b. All programming Agencies

b. Harmonized joint formatCBFoutcome/ theme


20

UNDAP Review and Monitoring Process

Figure 4: UNDAP Review & Planning

The performance of the UNDAF Action Plan will be monitored based on the outcome and

output indicators of the UNDAP Performance Monitoring Matrix. This monitoring process

would be synchronized with the mid-year and annual review processes of the UNDAF in 9

addition to other monitoring activities contained in the UNDAF M&E Calendar. During the

mid-year and annual review meetings the output indicators will be assessed. The outcome

indicators would be assessed mainly at the MTR and at the end-of cycle evaluation. The

details of the indicators to be tracked are as stated in the performance monitoring matrix. To

ensure broad understanding of the technical meaning of the indicators and how to measure

their values, an indicator metadata has been developed and would serve as a reference

document for this process. The assessment would be carried out against the targets set in

the monitoring matrix. The various theme groups of the UNCT would have the opportunity to

review the annual targets as necessary during the annual review. Annual review exercises

at the end of each year will inform the UN support to the national planning exercise in the

following June/July of each year. Figure 4 illustrates the relationship between the review

and the planning process of the UNDAP.

9 UNDAF M&E Calendar contains the field monitoring visits schedule and the planning and review meetings (see annex)

2015Planning

2016 Planning

2017 Planning

UNDAF III Programme Implementation Commencement (Jan.2014)

2014 A

R

2015 A

R

2016 A

R

2014 MYR 2015 MYR 2016 MYR

Field Monitoring

In order to make field monitoring more efficient and effective, monitoring visits will take place

at sub-national levels and at the federal levels by the UN Offices closest to them. As much as

possible, the field visits would be conducted jointly between UN Agencies, Government

agencies/ministries, INGOs, NGOs and private sector organizations working with specific

UNDAP Theme groups. The UN DMAG (M&E Group) would provide technical support for


21

Theme groups for field visit in line with its ToR. All monitoring visits will complement all other

programme-specific field visits that may be conducted. The main objectives of the visits

would be to monitor the quality of the UN-supported interventions/activities/services;

assess difficulties in implementation of activities; obtain inputs from staff and partners on

ground on lessons learnt and challenges encountered; and collect monitoring data as

needed. A minimum of one joint field monitoring mission(s) will be organized each year by at

least two UN agencies within the Theme groups. The DMAG will prepare standardized field

monitoring tools and instruments to ensure the monitoring process is well structured and

tailored towards meeting set objectives.

In line with the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the Accra Agenda of Action, the

UN system in Nigeria will provide annual reports to the government of Nigeria comprising

programmatic and financial updates on the implementation of UNDAF III. This would be

coordinated by the Office of the Resident Coordinator. All UN Agencies, the UNDAF/P

lead/co-leads would be jointly responsible for the provision of information for the report. The

DMAG would provide quality assurance and technical assistance for the reporting

processes and products by the UNDAF Thematic Groups to ensure a robust reporting of

UN activities in Nigeria.

The UN Country Team will hold mid-year and joint annual reviews with Government as part

of the UNDAF annual review process. The joint meeting replaces any individual mid-year

annual review meeting that UN agencies would hold with government counterpart/s and

could be organized on geo-political zonal basis to ensure that all states are covered. The

UNDAF mid-year and annual reviews will use the UNDAP results matrix, taking account of

the existing M&E systems and available information and data and will present results

achieved in any one year. The periodicity of this review/report shall be on annual basis with

specific timing as indicated in Figure 5.

Reporting Performance


22

Figure 5: UNDAF/P Review Calendar

JULY 15 NOVEMBER

20 NOVEMBER

25 NOVEMBER

05 DECEMBER

EARLY - MID

DEC

END DEC/ JAN

Year review of progress made with government, CSOs & IPs

Annual review processes commence Reporting against UNDAF/P and outputs outcomes Submission by theme and result areas .

DMAG analyzes submissions Submission to PMT PMT review and submission to UNCT.

UNCT review of consolidated UNDAF/P annual report Preparations for UNDAF/P Annual Review meeting with IPs.

UNDAF review report summary submitted to Steering Committee and CAF

UNDAF/P joint annual review meeting with IPs and Steering Committee Validation of annual review report

Extraction for Agency annual reports Finalized UNDAF Annual Report RCO Annual Report to UN SG

Mid-

UNDAF Database

Evaluation Processes

The Di Monitoring software version of the DevInfo package would be adapted accordingly

to track progress on each outcome and output indicators as contained in the UNDAP

matrix. The Di Monitoring system would be set up by the Resident Coordinator's Office with

strong technical support from the DMAG. The database will facilitate the periodic review

processes and aid the UN agencies to report on progress in a more systematic manner

across the UN Agencies in Nigeria. As much as possible, the data base would be adapted to

monitor not only the programmatic aspect of the UNDAF, but to also track associated

financial information on the joint programme implementation. In line with the current

direction of government in database management, the Di Monitoring would be online,

enabling all UN staff in Nigeria to access information on the database according to needs.

10The evaluation processes of the UNDAF would largely rely on the IMEP jointly designed

by the government and the UN System in Nigeria. The IMEP is largely designed to ensure

that: (a) intervention models are based on adequate understanding of the context; (b)

performance is monitored for learning and corrective purposes at appropriate times; (c)

programme-related decision-making is guided by evidence; and (d) UN's accountability will

be measured only at the National Capacity Development level. In addition, data will also be

collected through coordinated UN support to GoN-led major surveys to provide a basis for

assessing the impact of UNDAF III on national partners' performance toward achieving

10 The IMEP is the Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan developed by the Government and UN system in Nigeria (see details in annex below)


23

MDGs and other sustainable development goals. The following would form the major

approach to support the UNDAF evaluation processes:

i. Baseline Assessment would be a virtual assessment using desk review of related

studies, research works and programme data and would draw mainly on findings of

the End of Programme Evaluation of the UNDAF II. Values for related indicators

gathered from the UNDAF II evaluation process would provide data that would serve

as baseline prior to commencement of the UNDAF III in 2014.

ii. A Mid-Term formative evaluation entitled 'Evaluation of UNDAF III's adherence to aid

effectiveness [and UN core] principles and its impact on quality, relevance and

effectiveness of Nigeria-UN collaboration' would be done. Designed for learning and

corrective purposes, this evaluation will be implemented in mid 2015 to inform the

GoN-led Mid-Term Review of UNDAF III (2016). All research, major data collection

activities and UN ERP-generated programme process-related data during 2014-

2015 will be targeted at this evaluation; and

An End of Cycle formative and summative evaluation entitled 'Assessment of the effect of

UNDAF III in improving Nigeria's institutional, systemic, and human resource capacities in

good governance, social capital development, sustainable and equitable growth, and

human security and risk management (2017)' would also be done. Conceived as ex-ante

evaluation for the future UNDAF IV, this evaluation will assess the effectiveness of UNDAF

III, set strategic baselines and formulate lessons for UNDAF IV. All data collected throughout

programme cycle (2014-2017) will aim at informing this evaluation. All the evaluations would 11be conducted as independently as possible.

Implementing Partners agree to cooperate with the UN system agencies in monitoring all

activities supported by cash transfers and will facilitate access to relevant financial records

and personnel responsible for the administration of cash provided by the UN system

agencies. To that effect, Implementing Partners agree to the following:

1. Periodic on-site review and spot checks of their financial records by the UN agencies

or their representatives,

2. Programmatic monitoring of activities following the UN system agencies' standards

and guidance for site visits and field monitoring,

3. Special or scheduled audits. Each UN organization, in collaboration with other UN

Cash Transfers Assurance Activities

11 The UNEG recommends that all UN Country Evaluations must be independent and has also provided certain criteria for 'independent evaluations'


24

system agencies (where so desired and in consultation with the respective

coordinating Ministry) will establish an annual audit plan, giving priority to audits of

Implementing Partners with large amounts of cash assistance provided by the UN

system agencies, and those whose financial management capacity needs

strengthening.

The Supreme Audit Institution may undertake the audits of Government Implementing

Partners. If the SAI chooses not to undertake the audits of specific Implementing Partners to

the frequency and scope required by the UN system agencies, the UN system agencies will

commission the audits to be undertaken by private sector audit services.

The Government of Nigeria at federal and state levels will collaborate with the UN system in

joint planning, implementation and regular review of UNDAF III programme processes and

modalities. Government leadership and ownership of the UNDAF at all stages is critical

towards ensuring that measurable results are achieved. Government will serve on the

UNDAF Steering committee and collaborate with the Theme groups to review progress and

discuss the implementation of UN joint programmes and collaborative programming

activities.

Government will also provide all entry clearance requirements for agreed items that are

recurring and non-recurring, which are necessary for managing and implementing UN

programmes under the UNDAF, at all ports of entry in the country and will, to the extent

possible or as agreed, provide warehousing and transportation of the programme-related

goods to the end user, personnel and premises.

In addition, Government will establish and strengthen national development coordination

structures, including sector-based platforms, which will allow the UN to adequately position

UNDAF-related programmes within national development planning, implementation and

M&E systems and avoid pursuing parallel stand-alone processes.

Government will support the UN system agencies' efforts to raise funds required to meet the

funding gaps of the UNDAF Action Plan and will cooperate with the UN system agencies to

encourage potential donor Governments to make available to the UN system agencies

funds required to implement unfunded components of the programme. This will include

endorsement of the UN system agencies' efforts to raise funds from the private sector both

internationally and in Nigeria; and by permitting contributions from individuals, corporations

9. Commitments of the Government


25

and foundations in the country, which will be tax exempt for the donor, to the maximum

extent permissible under the applicable laws and regulations. Equally, no taxes, fees, tolls or

duties shall be levied on supplies, equipment, or services furnished by the UN agency under

the UNDAF Action Plan. The UN agency shall also be exempt from Value Added Tax (VAT) in

respect of local procurement of supplies or services procured in support of UN-assisted

programmes.

Government will provide monetary and/or in-kind contribution to the activities of the UNDAF

III through an agreed percentage Government Counterpart Cash Contributions (GCCC) of

the total programme value to be released at agreed intervals and other agreed contributions

between the UN and government entities at state and federal levels.

Cash assistance for travel, stipends, honoraria and other costs for government counterparts

shall be set at rates commensurate with those applied in the country, but not higher than

those applicable to the United Nations system (as stated in the ICSC circulars).

Where applicable and in regard to fund disbursement, a standard Fund Authorization and

Certificate of Expenditures (FACE) report, reflecting the activity lines of an agreed annual

work plan (AWP) between the UN and Implementing Partners will be used. The FACE will be

used to request for the release of funds as advances, or to secure the agreement that a UN

agency will reimburse or directly pay for planned expenditure. The Implementing Partners

will use the FACE to report on the utilization of funds received. The Implementing Partner

shall identify the designated official(s) authorized to provide the account details, as well as

request and certify the use of cash. The FACE will be certified by the designated official(s) of

the Implementing Partner and by a UN staff member.

All funds transferred and supplies provided to Implementing Partners should be used for the

stated purpose of activities only and within the timeframe, as agreed in the annual work

plans (AWPs). only.

Cash received by the Government and national NGO Implementing Partners shall be used

in accordance with established national regulations, policies and procedures consistent

with international standards, in particular ensuring that cash is expended for activities as

agreed in the annual work plans (AWPs), and ensuring that reports on the utilization of all

received cash are submitted to the respective UN Agencies within a maximum of six months

after receipt of the funds. Where any of the national regulations, policies and procedures is

not consistent with international standards, the UN system agency financial and other

related rules and system agency regulations, policies and procedures will apply.


26

In the case of international NGO/CSO and INGO Implementing Partners, any fund received

must be used in accordance with international standards. In particular, they must ensure

that the money is spent on activities as agreed in the annual work plans (AWPs), and that

reports on the full utilization of all received monies are submitted to the respective UN

agencies within a maximum of six months after receipt of the funds.

To facilitate scheduled and special audits, including the Harmonized Approach to Cash

Transfer (HACT), joint programme financing monitoring processes, each Implementing

Partner that receives money from UN agencies will provide the UN system agency or its

representative with timely access to:

Ÿ All financial records which establish the transactional record of the cash transfers

provided by a UN system agency, together with relevant documentation;

Ÿ All relevant documentation and personnel associated with the functioning of the

Implementing Partner's internal control structure through which the cash transfers

have passed.

The findings of each audit will be reported to the Implementing Partner and UN agency or

fund. Each Implementing Partner will furthermore:

• Receive and review the audit report issued by the auditors.

• Provide a timely statement of the acceptance or rejection of any audit

recommendation to the UN agency or fund that provided cash support. Where the

Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) has been identified to conduct the audits, the IP must

ensure that such documentation is provided within the SAI final audit report before

submitting it to the UN agency or fund.

• Undertake timely actions to address the accepted audit recommendations.

• Report on the actions taken to implement accepted recommendations to the UN

system agencies and to the SAI, on a quarterly basis or as agreed by all parties.

This UNDAF Action Plan (UAP) supersedes any previously signed agency Country

Programme Action Plans (CPAPs).

10 Other provisions


27

In the event of any significant change in the situation requiring a change in objectives or a

need to extend the duration and scope of the planned programme components, the

Government will make a formal request to the UN system in Nigeria through the Office of the

Resident Coordinator. An appropriate amendment to the UNDAF Action Plan will thus be

negotiated in collaboration with Representatives of each of the UN agencies.

In the event of a failure by one party to fulfil any of its obligations under this UNDAF Action

Plan:

a. Where the defaulting party is one of the UN system agencies, the Government may

either (i) suspend the discharge of its own obligations vis-à-vis the defaulting party

by giving written notice to that effect to the defaulting party; or (ii) terminate the

UNDAF Action Plan vis-à-vis the defaulting party by giving written notice of 60 days

to the defaulting party; and

b. Where the defaulting party is the Government, the UN system agency concerned,

either alone or together with all other UN system agencies, may either (i) suspend

the discharge of its own obligations by giving written notice to that effect to the

defaulting party; or (ii) terminate the UNDAF Action Plan by giving written notice of

60 days to the defaulting party.

Any dispute between the Government and a UN system agency shall be resolved in

accordance with the provisions of that Organization's basic agreement with the Government

as referred to in Part 2 of the UNDAF Action Plan. Any dispute among the UN system

agencies shall be resolved exclusively among the UN system agencies through approaches

identified in the UNDG-endorsed dispute resolution mechanism.

The Government will honour its commitments in accordance with the provisions of the

cooperation and assistance agreements outlined in Table 1 (see the section on Basis of the

Relationship). The Government will apply the provisions of the Convention on the Privileges

and Immunities of the United Nations agencies to the Agencies' property, funds, and assets

and to its officials and consultants. In addition the Government will accord to the Agencies

and their officials and to other persons performing services on behalf of the Agencies, the

privileges, immunities and facilities as set out in the cooperation and assistance agreements

between the Agencies and the Government.

The Government will be responsible for dealing with any claims, which may be brought by


28

third parties against any of the Agencies and its officials, advisers and agents. None of the

Agencies nor any of their respective officials, advisors or persons will be held responsible for

any claims and liabilities resulting from operations under the cooperation and assistance

agreements, except where it is mutually agreed by Government and a particular Agency that

such claims and liabilities arise from gross negligence or misconduct of that Agency, or its

officials, advisors or persons performing services.

Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, the Government shall insure or

indemnify the Agencies from civil liability under the law of the country in respect of vehicles

provided by the Agencies but under the control of or use by the Government.

Nothing in this Agreement shall imply a waiver by the UN or any of its Agencies or

Organizations of any privileges or immunities enjoyed by them or their acceptance of the

jurisdiction of the courts of any country over disputes arising of this Agreement.

Nothing in or relating to the UAP will be deemed a waiver, expressed or implied, of the

privileges and immunities of the United Nations and its subsidiary organs, whether under the

Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of 13 February 1946, the

Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies of 21 November

1947, as applicable, and no provisions of a Note Verbale or any Institutional Contract or any

Undertaking will be interpreted or applied in a manner, or to an extent, inconsistent with such

privileges and immunities.

IN WITNESS THEREOF the undersigned, being duly authorized, have signed this UNDAF

Action Plan on this day, 15 May 2014 in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Federal Republic

of Nigeria.


29

NIGERIA UNDAF ACTION PLAN RESULTS MATRIX

Result Area 1: Good Governance

Strategic Result/National Development Priority: By 2020 Nigeria enjoys a just, democratic, stable society, with accountable governance and increased transparency, through trusted, regulated, participatory electoral processes and high institutional performance, governed by the Rule of Law, consisting of Legislative processes compliant with international standards, an responsive Executive, and an independent and accessible justice system, which are effectively coordinated, with Human Rights & Gender Equality institutions effectively monitoring, reporting and redressing violations especially among the most marginalized, and people claiming their rights.

Support to MDGs: All MDGs

Outcomes Agency results Indicators (i), Baseline (b), Target (t) Means of Verification Role of Partners

Outcome 1: Strengthened accountability and respect for the Rule of Law, compliant with international standards and human rights, provide inclusive, age- and gender-responsive, equitable access to Justice, with strengthened and coordinated institutions ensuring enhanced integrity and reduced corruption through transparency, strengthened preventive and regulatory policies and frameworks and engaged civil society and media, by 2017

- UNDP.- UNODC.- UNOPS.- UNHCR- ILO- UNESCO- IFAD- UNITAR- UNFPA.- UNICEF- UN HABITAT- UNWOMEN- IOM- UNFPA

- i: Proportion of relevant domestic laws reflecting international principles, standards and norms.

- b: 14 partial - t: 14 Fully

- i: Proportion States that have adopted relevant laws in compliance with international standards.

- b: 24- t: 28

- i: Number of States that have adopted urban governance and environmental management processes that conform to international norms.

- b: TBD- t: TBD

- i: Percentage population satisfied with the Justice System. Aggregate Number days for cases to be heard & disposed (disaggregated by age and gender).

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Proportion States who have enacted the Child Rights Law.

- b: 0 - t: 10

- Legal Gazette - Audit- Transparency

International CPI report

- Corruption report Survey (2014, 2017)Court registry

Government: Policy Coordination, Resource Provision and enabling environment.

CSOs: Support, direct implementation and advocacy.

Development Partners and Private Sector: Resource provision, implementation, partnerships.

Coordination, facilitation and support for mobilization of counterpart funding/Cost-Share funds and structures for implementation.

Political commitment; Strategic leadership, Supervision and coordination.

Voice and accountability, Advocacy, awareness creation.

Policy reforms at the State level and funding. Incorporation of local development Plans into National


30


- i:Transparency International Corruption Perception Index (CPI).

- b: 27/100 - t: 50/100

- Percentage population satisfied with the Justice System. Aggregate Number days for cases to be heard & disposed (disaggregated by age and gender)

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage of children in contact with the law who are treated in line with international standards on access to justice for children.

- b: TBD t: 100%

Development Plans and Strategies & Monitoring..

Output 1.1.1: Capacity at Federal and State level for coordination, law reforms and service delivery for Justice Sector institutions to provide inclusive, age- and gender-responsive, equitable and timely access to Justice, and for anti-corruption institutions to prevent and regulate corruption, is strengthened.

UNDP- Public accountability

mechanisms strengthened through the conduct of corruption risk assessments in related Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) at national levels and in at least 3 States.

- Improved legislative and policy frameworks for transparency and accountability at national level and in at least 3 States in the core Niger Delta region.

UNWOMEN- Capacity of Law

Enforcement Agents and Justice sector service providers for Human rights sensitive service delivery (especially on

- i: Number of corruption risk assessments conducted in MDG-related MDAs (water, health and education).

- b: Corruption risk assessment methodology developed and local capacity built (69 certified) for the conduct of corruption risk assessments in related MDAs in the water, health and education sectors.

- t: Corruption risk assessments conducted in at least one MDA from each of the target related sectors (water, health and education) towards strengthening their integrity and accountability mechanisms at National level and in at least 3 selected States.

- i: Number of additional corruption risk assessors trained to conduct corruption risk assessments in MDG-related MDAs (water, health and education).

- b: Pilot corruption risk assessment conducted in the ports sector.

- t: At least 50 additional experts certified to conduct corruption risk assessments drawn from National level and selected States.

- i: Develop tool kits and knowledge products to promote public procurement reforms;

- Corruption risk assessment reports and Integrity plans.

- UNDP reports- Evaluation reports and

assessments.- Reports of activities- Policy documents- Training curricula- National Industrial

Court , Industrial Arbitration Panel FMLP and social partners' records

- Agency Annual reports- Public Procurement

Act- Programme and

Activity Reports- Justice sector plans- Justice sector plans- Police caseload

records- CPN monthly reports

TUGAR (ICPC): Policy direction and coordination for corruption risk assessments in related MDAs at national level and in selected States.

State Governments of Rivers, Akwa Ibom and Delta States/Bureau for Public Procurement (BPP): counterpart funding and implementation of activities.

Nigeria Police: Facilitation for increased resources, coordination and endorsement for Human Rights based capacity building and service delivery. Swiss Embassy: Provision of resources.

MWASD: Coordination, facilitation and support for mobilization including counterpart funding

NAPTIP: Active participation and implementation of counter-


31


Women's Rights and anti-VAW) strengthened

- Law Enforcement agents and Justice sector service providers on Human rights have technical capacity to facilitate access to Justice for Gender Based Violence

ILO- Capacities of Workers

and Employers Representative Organisations and other stakeholders strengthened for enforcement of effective justice system in the world of work.

UNESCO- Freedom of expression

and public access to information promoted through advocacy and capacity building on FOI Act, and the UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists Observatory Network of the Media and CSOs established to coordinate data gathering on cases of abuse against the press.

UNOPS - Capacity of anti-

corruption agencies on procurement and supply chain management and administration enhanced.

- b: Draft tool kits and knowledge products available - t: Develop tool kits and knowledge products to

promote public procurement reforms in at least 3 States.

- i: Number of public procurement reform related structures put in place to strengthen accountability and promote public procurement reforms in at least 3 States.

- b: Public procurement law and implementing institution in Rivers State: Public Procurement Law passed in Delta State; and draft public procurement law in Akwa Ibom State

- t: Support the establishment public procurement laws/institutions in Delta and Akwa Ibom States.

- i: Number of law enforcement agencies with capacity to respond to gender based violence

- b: 0 - t: 2 Law enforcement agencies

- Number of policies, training curricula developed for HR.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of Police Colleges utilizing the new Human Rights curriculum.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- I: Number Employers trained on Alternative Dispute resolution (ADR Techniques)

- b: TBD - t:: Number Workers Representative Organizations.

- i: Number of workers and employers representatives trained on exiting National Labour Legislation and International Conventions

- b:TBD - t: 25% increase in trained staff of workers/employer

organizations .

trafficking measures.

LACON: FIDA Pro bono legal services for survivors of violence.

FIDA: Technical facilitation.FMoLP: Coordination and Facilitation of capacity building process.NECA, NLC and TUC: implementation.

Federal Ministry of Justice: Coordination and reporting. National Assembly: Legislation and compliancePolice/NSCDC: implementation

CSOs/Media: Observatory Network and implementation

Federal Ministry of Information: Coordination and facilitation.

National Commission for UNESCO: Strategic and implementing support.

BPP : Operational support and interagency coordination.CBI: coordinate advocacy with other national stakeholders

FMoJ: coordination and policy direction for justice sector. IATT/TUGAR: Platform for operating M&E system based on national anti-corruption strategy

State MoJs: provision of ADR services


32

- National Council on Procurement established

UNODC- Justice sector

coordination structures at federal and 10 State levels established and/or strengthened

- M&E system for the National Strategy to Combat Corruption (NStCC) supported.

- Effective ADR mechanisms established in Courts and Ministries of Justice at Federal level and 10 States.

- Justice sector Plan developed in 10 State

UNHCR- Capacity of border

officials strengthened on International and National Refugee Law and framework for protection of refugees and persons on the move; and respect to the principle of non-refoulement.

UNICEFThe capacity of key

institutions of justice and social welfare sectors is strengthened to implement gender-/age-appropriate child justice administration at Federal level and in 10 States.

- i: No of workers who access justice in the world of work

- b:TBD - t: 20% increase in workers that accessed justice

- i: Number of requests and approvals recorded under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of law enforcement agencies CSOs and media capacitated

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of anti-corruption agencies that demonstrate effective management capacity of the procurement system.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of functional coordination mechanisms in place at Federal and State levels

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of State Action Plans developed.- b:0 - t: 4 States with justice sector plan

- i: Number of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms established.

- b:Zero - t::At least 4 ADR service centers supported by 2015.

- i: Number of Judicial Officials with improved capacity on Alternative Dispute Resolution.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: NStCC M&E Framework incorporates ACA manuals

NCFR: Coordination and facilitation.NIS: Operational and technical level support.

Nigeria Police: Political Commitment and facilitation, integrate Human Rights perspective into their curriculum with support from Swiss Embassy. Collaborate with other service providers to run one-stop centers effectively.

MWASD: Coordination, facilitation monitoring and mobilization of counterpart funding for Child Protection Network.



33

and tools.- b: Zero - t: Harmonized M&E System for NStCC

- i: Number of States with a functional diversion programme within juvenile justice.

- b:0- t: 10 States

- i: Number of States with law enforcement units in targeted areas with capacity to apply a nationally established protocol for child protection complaints.

- b:0- t: 10 States

- i: Number of States with capacity to develop legislation and age-/gender appropriate measures allowing children to engage in civil and administrative proceedings that affect them.

- b:0- t: 10 States


Output 1.1.2: Capacity of CSOs, including their internal governance mechanisms, and for constructive dialogue between Civil society organizations, media, other stakeholders and government are strengthened to enable civil society to monitor the budgetary and judicial processes, anti-corruption institutions, and can play their watchdog role.

- Evaluation reports and assessment

- Monitoring tools on GRB

- UNDAF/P Annual Reports s

UNDP- Civil Society

Organizations (CSOs) have increased capacity to mobilise citizens for anti- corruption initiatives and to monitor and report on budgets.

- Youth empowered through dynamic and innovative platforms to promote integrity and public accountability in Anglophone West Africa.

UNWOMEN- Capacity of Women's

rights advocates, CSOs, Media on Gender

i: Number. of target CSOs with enhanced capacity to engage in anti-corruption

- activities and to actively monitor budgets at local levels.

- b: 17 CSOs in 9 States (Delta, Niger, Sokoto, Edo, Kano, Anambra, Imo, Akwa Ibom, Adamawa and the (FCT).

- t: At least 25 additional CSOs in the selected States within strengthened civil society anti-corruption networks.

- i: Number of youth empowered to promote integrity and public accountability in target communities/sectors.

- b: 67 youth, drawn from Nigeria and other countries in Anglophone West Africa

- t: 100youth empowered through integrity camp, knowledge products and tool kits and other platforms for Anglophone West African youth by 2015.

CSOs/ ICPC/EFCC: active engagement in budget monitoring and other judicial processes and capacity building towards improving the provision of services and increased citizen participation in anti-corruption activities.

ICPC/Transparency International (TI)/ UNDP Regional Centre: engagement with the selected youth from Nigerian and Anglophone West Africa.

Media organizations: Beneficiaries and implementation Journalism training institutions: institutional platform for quality journalism capacity building.Community associations:


34


implementation

NASS: Hhigh level legislative participation and commitment to engage with CSOs

NLC, TUC, NECA and MoLP: provide monitoring and oversight to the budgetary and judicial processes.

CSOs: Active engagement with the NASS and ACAs for implementation.

ICPC/ EFCC: Facilitation

responsive budgeting (GRB) and monitoring strengthened

- Effective functioning of CBOs platforms for dialogue, prevention and access to justice established

ILO- Capacity of Workers and

Employers Representative Organisations to monitor the budgetary and judicial processes strengthened.

UNESCO- Institutional and technical

capacity for investigative journalism training and practice strengthened through adaptation of UNESCO model curricula

- Free, independent and pluralistic media promoted through community radio in line with FOI principle

UNODC- Capacity of relevant

National Assembly committees with oversight responsibilities for public resources enhanced.

- Capacity of Non-State actors to partner with the NASS on Anti-corruption activities developed

- i: Number of youth projects/initiatives funded to promote integrity and public accountability in target communities/sectors.

- b: 10 youth projects/initiatives funded to promote integrity and public accountability

- t: At least 20 youth projects/initiatives funded to promote integrity and public accountability.

- i: Number of CSOs, media, and women's rights advocates with enhanced capacity to monitor GRB.

- b: 0 - t: 200

- i: Number of workers and employers representative organizations with ability to monitor and produce reports on the budgetary and judicial processes.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Proportion of investigative journalistic reports published.

- b:TDB - t: TBD

- i: Number of journalism training institutions that adapted UNESCO model curricula for journalism training.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of community radio stations licensed and established.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of NASS committees with enhanced capacity for public resource management.

- b: 0 - t: At least 50 relevant committee members and non-

State actors with improved capacity by 2016.

- i: Number of non-State with capacity to leverage


35


UNITAR- Internal governance

structures enhanced with established lines of authority. Capacity of CSOs and Media enhanced for advocacy and public accountability through community Development.

partnerships with NASS on ant-corruption.- b:TBD

- t: At least 25 additional CSOs in the selected States within strengthened civil society anti-corruption networks.

- i: Proportion of anti-corruption CSOs with established internal governance structure

- b: 20 CSOs with weak internal governance capacity - t: 20 CSOs with good governance structure

- i: Number of CSOs and media with improved capacity for advocacy in public accountability

- b: 20 CSOs and Media organizations- t: 100 CSOs and media with Increased capacity for

advocacy in public accountability.

Outcome 1.2: Nigeria's democracy is deepened through inclusive Electoral processes with independent and transparent regulatory mechanisms, democratic political parties, and active and equitable citizens' participation and women's empowerment holding elected officials to account, by 2017

- Voter Registrar- Afro-BarometerObserver reports (2011,

2015)

As Listed below- UNDP.- UNODC.- UNOPS.- UNHCR- ILO- UNESCO- IFAD- UNITAR- UNFPA.- UNICEF- UN HABITAT- UNWOMEN- IOM- UNFPA

- i: Proportion of women elected to National Assembly. - b: 6.8% - t: 10%

- i: Proportion of women voters at national elections.- b: TBD - t:: TBD

- i: Percentage Population in support of democratic processes.

- b: 72% (2008, INEC) - t: 90%

- i: Credibility of 2015 elections based on observer report criteria.

- b: TBD - t:TBD

Output 1.2.1: Election management bodies' (especially Independent National Electoral Commission) capacity

- Voter Registrar- Afro-Barometer- Observer reports

(2011, 2015- UNDAF/P and

INEC/SIECs Reports

EU, DFATD Canada, DFID, KOICA: Technical and financial support.

INEC/SIEC:Coordination and implementation

UNDP- Independent National

Electoral Commission/Sate Independent Electoral

- i: Percentage of targets in the INECs 2012 – 2016 . Strategic plan achieved.

- b: Zero Implementation of INEC strategic plan in 2012 - t: 1 plan for INEC and at least 6 SIECs. 50% of

INEC's Strategic Plan target achieved by 2016.


36


strengthened in strategic planning, policy formulation and administration of elections.

Commissions (INEC/SIEC's) capacity for implementation of strategic plans and professional management of elections enhance

- Improved and more consensual legal and policy framework for elections in place.

UNWOMENTechnical capacity of

Electoral Management Bodies (particularly INEC) on gender responsive strategic planning and policy formulation strengthened

- i: Number of electoral institutions (INEC/SIECs) with enhanced capacity in strategic planning, policy formulation and gender mainstreaming.

- b: 1 electoral institution with some capacities in strategic planning.

- t: 20% of Electoral Management Body (INEC/SIECs) with capacities for strategic planning, policy formulation and gender mainstreaming.

- i: Amendment of the 2010 electoral Act in place.- b:TBD - t: TBD

FMWASD Supporting all gender based capacity building, provision of counterpart funds and coordination

Output 1.2.2: Political parties have strengthened platforms and mechanisms (IPAC, INEC, Civil Society) to promote human rights, women's participation, respect for non-violence in the democratic processes and their implications for democratic development

- INEC, media and IPAC reports.

- INEC and SIECs records

- Party documentation

EU, DFATD Canada DFID, KOICA: Technical and financial support.

INEC/SIEC:Implementation and facilitation and counterpart funds

FMWASD Capacity building, counterpart funds, policy direction.

NASS: Enactment of laws in support of Affirmative Action Domestication of relevant International affirmative action.

Political Parties:Implementation

UNDP- Inter-Party Advisory

Council (IPAC) capacity to promote inter-party dialogue improved.

- Strengthened capacity of political parties and institutions to focus on policy and issue-based campaigns.

- Improved participation of women in the electoral process as voters and candidates.

UN WOMENTechnical capacity of

political parties for increased participation and representation of

- i: Number and types of IPAC related dialogues involving major political parties and CSOs.

- b: Zero level engagement of major political parties in IPAC

- t: 20% increased

- i: Percentage reduction in elections related violence.- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Number of political party campaigns that are issue –based.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of political parties that have adopted gender perspectives in their platforms, structures and policies.

- b: 3 political parties have gender perspectives in their structures and platforms.

- t: TBD


37


women in political activities strengthened

Output 1.2.3: CSOs, traditional leaders, women's groups and other key stakeholders are able to conduct civic education and advocacy for affirmative action to increase women's participation in politics and the electoral process.

- CSO annual reports, - Print and electronic

media reports.- Party records

CSOs, Political Parties, Media.:, Advocacy and implementation;

EU, DFID, KOICA, DFATD Canadian: Funding and technical support for implementation.

UNDP:- Civil Society

Organizations have increased capacity to advocate for free, fair and credible elections.

- Civil Society Organizations with improved capacity to document disseminate and mitigate incidence(s) of political conflict A stronger and diversified media sustains, influences and gives voice to democratic values and ethics.

UNWOMEN:Capacity of women

advocates engaged in conducting civic education and advocating for Affirmative Action strengthened.

- i:: Number of CSOs advocating for free, fair and credible elections.

- b: <5% of CSOs and media focused on free, fair and credible elections

- t: 10% of CSOs and media to focus on free, fair and credible elections

- i: Number of incidence of political violence reported by CSOs.

- b: <5% focus of CSOs and media on political violence - t: 10% of CSOs and media focus on political violence

Outcome 1.3 Human Rights of Nigerians and Gender Equality are promoted and protected through reliable and timely monitoring and reporting mechanisms at Federal, State and LGA level, effective gender-responsive and age-appropriate redress measures, in an environment compliant with international standards, by 2017.

- NHRC field offices Records

- NHRC reports

- CPN Reports

As listed below;Agencies listed in outcome 1 - I: Number of human rights violations reported in a reliable and timely manner (disaggregated by age, gender, geography).

- b: TBD - t:75%

- i: Proportion of reported human rights violations that are redressed (age, gender, geography).

- b: 0 - t:100%

- i: Percentage of reported cases of violence against children responded to within 48 hours.

- b: TBD - t: 50%


38


Output 1.3.1 : Institutions and community capacities are strengthened and age-appropriate prevention, protection, reliable and timely monitoring and reporting and redress of human rights violations

- NHRC Report- Availability of centre;- Existence of Crisis

Help Lines- Situational analysis

report- States annual

operational plan- MoLP and NAPTIP

Reports- Data on Child Labour- FMLP Reports- Media Reports- Agency Assessment

Reports- Project - UNADF/P Annual

reports- NHRC reports- CPN monthly reports- Survey data (ii:e.

National Violence against Children study)

- NHRC report

NHRC: coordination facilitation and implementation

FMWASD and SMWASD: Policy direction and support for the establishment of One-Stop Centers.

MWASD/NPF: Coordination, facilitation support for mobilization of counterpart funding and implementation.

Medical service providers, CSOs, FIDA: implementation and continuum support.

FMOH and State partners: adaption of technical technical guidelines and implementation.

MoLP/NAPTIP: implementation and coordination.

FMLP: coordinate capacity building of labor inspectors

National Legal Aid Council: Policy and strategic direction.

Nigeria Police Force: institutional commitment for implementation.

FMoJ/MoJs: Coordination and Policy direction.

FMOH and FMWSD: Policy direction, facilitation and coordination.

NCFR: Coordination facilitation and technical level support for implementation, monitoring and evaluation.

UNDP- Capacity of National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and CSOs strengthened to promote and protect human rights – civil and political, social and economic, cultural.

UNWOMEN- Model One-stop Centers (OSCs) for reporting Women's Rights violations that respond to the needs of violated women at national and State levels established

- Provide support for National and State Help Lines on VAW at all levels.

WHO (RFH)- FMOH and FMWSD supported to conduct a situation analysis to identify risks and gaps on mainstreaming GEHR in programmes

- Gender, equity and human rights (GEHR) incorporated in routine strategic and operational planning and monitoring of the Federal & States Health programmes.

- Technical guidelines adapted, through the health-in-all policies approach, to the country-level context; methodologies applied and

- i: Number. of NHRC monitoring reports produced featuring social, economic, and cultural rights dimension.

- b: Present reporting on civil and political liberties only - t: At least 1 national level report on social, economic,

and cultural rights

- i: Number of centres established.- b:TBD - t: 1

- i: Number of crisis help lines and referral hubs established and functioning for women and girls in distress.

- b:TBD - t: 1 line accessible across the nation.

- i: Number of situational Analysis conducted and data available on GEHR gaps & risks for operational planning.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage of State with health programme and plans incorporating GEHR.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of Adapted Guidelines at federal and State levels.

- b:50% - t: 100%

- i: Number of MDAs, social partners and NGOs with enhanced capacities in child labour prevention.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of child Labour victims identified, withdrawn rehabilitated.

- b:TBD - t: TBD


39


NHRC: implementation support. CPN: regular monitoring and reporting of rights violations and facilitate access to support services.

MoH: Civil society, community-based and faith-based organizations: social mobilization on rights issues and public legal education.

tools implemented to monitor and report on the mainstreaming of gender, equity and human rights into Federal & State health programmes

ILO- Capacities of relevant MDAs, social partners and NGOs for prevention, protection and rehabilitation of Child labour enhanced

IOM - Capacity of Labor Inspectors in protecting migrant workers enhanced.

- Public awareness created on the rights of migrants.

UNODC- Access to Justice and respect for human rights increased among criminal justice institutions

- Human rights desks in SCIDs including training of desk officers reinforced.

- Institutional capacities built for the development, adoption and implementation of a National Strategy on Legal Aid and Legal Assistance based on the Legal Aid Act 2011

UNFPA- Enhanced community

- i: Number of children prevented from being child labour victims.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- I: Number of labour inspectors with enhanced capacity on Migrants.

- b: 0 - t: 42

- I: Number of capacity building on the protection of migrants rights.

- b::0 - t: 4

- i: Number of Institutional assessments conducted.- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of human rights desks established at SCIDs.

- b:TBD - t: At least 1000 SCID Officers with improved capacity

- i: Availability of Nat'l Legal Aid Strategy.- b:TBD - t: 1 National Legal Aid Strategy in place by 2016

- i: Number of community structure and CBO with capacity to report and follow on RH violations.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of prosecutions on RH violations.- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: States collect and publish routine and sample survey-based data on violence, abuse, exploitation and neglect of children, including violent deaths and violent injuries (M/F).

- b: 0


40


structures and CBOs capacity to promote report and follow up on persecutions of RH rights violations especially of women and girls.

UNHCR- Capacity of Partners strengthened with respect to Protection monitoring and delivering using the age/gender and diversity mainstreaming approach to programming.

UNICEF- The capacity of key institutions and civil society is strengthened to monitor & report violence against children (VAC), generate and utilize evidence-base on VAC including in humanitarian context, in at least three States

- The capacity of key institutions, civil society and communities strengthened to promote gender-sensitive positive social norms to protect children from practices and behaviours harmful to them in focused States

- t: national VAC study completed

- i: Number of mechanisms to monitor and report on grave violations against children.

- b: 0 - t: At least 3 State Consitutions - i: Number and percentage of targeted children and

women who experience gender based violence in humanitarian/non-humanitarian situations receive support services.

- b: 283 (2013 CPN reported sexual violence cases Jan - August)

- t: at least 425 cases

- i: Percentage of targeted population is knowledgeable on protection risks and knows how to report child protection violations.

- b: 1,960 (2013 CPN reported Jan – August)- t: 2,940 (with annual increase of 25%)

- i: Number of people reached with support.- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage of reduction in the number of girls, boys, men and women (aged 15-49) who believe that a husband is justified in beating his wife under certain circumstances.

- b: TBD - t: 10% reduction

- i: Percentage of public awareness on migrants.- b:22% - t: 40%

Output 1.3.2: Capacity for legislative and regulatory reform at Federal and State level in compliance with international norms and standards and Nigeria's

- NASS Gazette- UNDAF/P Annual

Reports- Policy and Regulatory

reform documents/Reports

NASS, MoJ, WRAPA, MWASD, CSOs, MoL MWASD: Coordination, facilitation and support for mobilization of counterpart funding and structures for implementation.

UNWOMEN- Capacity of Legislators at

national and State levels for adoption of Women's Rights legislation strengthened

- i: Number of relevant Federal and State level Legislative bodies with enhanced capacity for legislative and regulatory reform in compliance with international norms and standards

- b:TBD - t: 6 State houses of assembly


41


commitments to human rights and gender equality is strengthened.

- Sensitization at the State level on Affirmative Action related legislations pursued

ILO- Capacity of the MoLP

and other relevant law enforcement agencies strengthened to undertake Policy and regulatory reform in harmony with International Labour Standards.

IOM - Domestic legal

framework to protect migrant workers in and from Nigeria adopted.

- i: Number of Gender Technical Units (GTU) supported to provide technical support to Legislators.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of legislations on affirmative action in States.

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of MoLP and other law enforcement agency with capacity on new Inspection methods as per the relevant International Labour Standards.

- b: TBD - t: 20% increase

- i: Number of Policy and regulatory reforms carried out by MoLP and other relevant Law Enforcement Agencies.

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Existence of domestic legal framework to protect migrants rights in Nigeria.

- b: 0 - t: 1

- Legal FrameworkFMoLP: Coordination and mobilization of social partners for capacity building process and coordination of regular drafting of reports

FMLP: Coordination and facilitation of the domestication of legal framework.

Output 1.3.3: Public, civil society, communities and media are empowered to advocate for, report and demand greater State promotion, respect, and protection of human rights and to form social engagement systems and networks to participate in equitable and sustainable social development through utilization of evidence-based social communication tools, channels and mechanisms.

- UNDAF/P Annual Reports

- Treaty body- Court Users' Guides- Detention Guidance

Manuals - Media reports

MWASD, NLN, LRCN, MWASD: Coordination, facilitation and support for mobilization of counterpart funding and structures for implementation

Media, CSOs: Advocacy and implementation.

LAC/Courts: Guidance and involvement in the development process of Court User Guide.

Nigeria Prisons Service: Collaboration and Implementation.

- i: Number of CSOs, MDAs, Media with enhanced capacity to advocate on AA and GEWE.

- b: TBD - t: 200

- i: Number of Court User Guides developed.- b: TBD - t: 10 States have Court User Guides by 2015

- i: Detention Guidance manual in place at federal and State levels.

- b: TBD - t: Detention Guidance Manual in place by 2016

- i: Number of media reports- b: TBD

UNWOMEN- Capacity of Public, civil

society, media on affirmative action & GEWE through social media platforms strengthened

UNODC- Criminal Justice sector

supported with expert advice and financial support for the development and dissemination of Court Users' Guides.


42


- Prisons and places of detention (including remand homes) supported to develop and disseminate guidance manual for assisting vulnerable prisoners and conduct training of relevant officials

UNICEF- The media, CSOs,

donors, stakeholders have relevant quality information on the situation and rights of children in Nigeria and are advocating for the realization of these rights.

- t: TBD

- i: Number of journalists trained- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of school of journalism working with curriculum on child right reporting

- b: TBD - t: TBD

School of journalism: integrate child rights reporting into curriculum.

Child rights information bureau: coordinate capacity development with media.Nigeria guild editors: coordinate media dialogues.

- Revenue Mobilization & Fiscal Commission reports

- Community records/reports

- State Plans - Participatory M&E - Perception survey


Outcome 1.4: By 2017, Local Governance is strengthened through increased deconcentration and decentralization of powers and resources and improved coordination between and among the different levels of government for strengthened accountability and effective service delivery, through improved technical and institutional capacity, and inclusive participation and engagement of citizens, communities, civil society and private sector.

- i: Proportion of allocated revenue transferred to LGAs in selected communities in targeted States.

- b: 20% - t: 255

- i: Percentage of additional revenue received by LGAs which is transferred communities in selected communities.

- b: 10% - t:30%

- i: Number of developmental responsibilities transferred to LGA.

- b: 25 - t: 14- i: Number of developmental responsibilities transferred

to communities. - b: 10 - t: 30% increase

- i: Proportion of projects in the Local Governance Agendas that are executed.

As listed below;


43


- b: TBD - t: 50%

- i: Percentage local population in the targeted LGAs satisfied with local government performance.

- b: 20% (NBS 2010) - t: TBD

- i: Percentage of citizens engaged in the LGA governance issues.

- b: TBD - t: 50%

- Published FM and Scheme of Service.

- LGA budget charts and financial receipts records.

- Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) allocation figures.

- UNDP/LGA Assessment reports

FMSDIGA: Coordination, facilitation and support for mobilization of counterpart funding and structures for implementation.

NPC: Coordination, Monitoring and harmonization of national priorities.

FMLH&UD: Coordination, facilitation and support for mobilization of counterpart funding and structures for implementation.

Participating States: Coordination, facilitation and mobilization of counterpart funding and structures for implementation at State level.

Participating LGAs. Implementation, Cost-Share funds and Technical Support to Communities.

Communities: Planning, Implementing and Managing investments, In-Kind contribution.

CSOs: Advocacy and implementation,

UNDP:- Enhanced working

structures and environment for selected Local Government Authority (LGA)

- Model LGAs demonstrate benefits of effective local governance and development.

- Improved Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) capacity in model LGAs.

UNWOMEN- Capacity of gender

equality advocates to monitor and assess performance of Local Governments strengthened

IFAD- Strengthened capacity of

Community Development Associations (CDAs) to serve as operational, participatory, inclusive,

Output 1.4.1: Replicable Model of Local Governance in place for evidence-based advocacy to influence decentralization and deconcentration of power and resources in an inclusive manner to the local government and communities.

- i: Reviewed financial memorandum and LGA Scheme of Service available.

- b: Zero and outdated financial memorandum and LGA scheme of service

- t: Revised FM and scheme of service for selected LGAs

- i: Number of LGAs that have developed and are implementing participatory local governance programmes.

- b: Development Strategy (LEEDS) developed by some LGAs with Zero implementation

- t: 2 rural and 2 urban model LGAs in place in each participating State

- i: Proportion of total LGA budget funded by Internally Generated Resources by selected LGAs.

- b: >1% of LGA budget derived from IGR- t: IGR comprise, at least 10% of LGA budget in 4 LGAs

in each participating State.

- I: Number of equality advocates with capacity to monitor LGA performance.

- b: TBD - t: 6 rural LGA


44


sustainable institutions for planning, implementation and monitoring of community development activities.

Output 1.4.2: Strengthened accountability mechanisms at local and community levels on development priorities for promoting inclusive equitable and gender responsive participatory planning, budgetary processes and monitoring and evaluation.

- Good Urban Governance (GUG) Index

- LGA plans and budget.

- State and LGA reports


- i: Number of LGAs in target States with increased technical support in participatory planning, budgetary processes and monitoring and evaluation.

- b: Zero Local Government Councils (LGC's) undertake oversight functions.

- t: LGAs per senatorial district

- i: Number of LGAs holding town-hall Meetings - b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of LGAs utilising e-based Citizens' feedback mechanism.

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of active CSOs(per geo-political zone) pushing for decentralization.

- b: Zero CSO presence at local level - t:: 1 CSO per senatorial District

- i: Percentage of community based organisation (CBOs) engaging LGAs in development planning.

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Good Local Governance (GLG) score card in place.- b: GUG indicators available and need to be translated

to GLG indicators - t: Adaptation of GUG to GLG indicators.

FMSDIGA: National Coordination.Ensuring Political WillProviding Cost-Share contribution..

NBS:Lead Development of LGA performance assessment and incorporation into national statistical database.

NPC: Incorporation of local development Plans into National Development Plans and Strategies.Monitoring

Participating States/ LGAs/Communities/CSOs: as in output 1.4.1:

FMSDIGA: Coordination and Cost-Share contribution.

UNDP:- Increased community

participation in Local governance and development in selected States

- Improved capacity of non-State actors to engage government institutions on social accountability.

- National LGA Performance Assessment mechanism in place.

UN WOMEN- Technical capacity of

LGAs in selected States for improved equitable and inclusive Plans and Budgets, to conduct gender responsive M&E strengthened

Output 1.4.3: Improved institutional capacity of local government and urban governance to coordinate, plan, generate resources, implement and monitor, for equitable

UNDP:- Institutionalisation of a

Local Development Fund (LDF).

- Enhanced service delivery through Public-Private

- i: Number of States with established LDF.- b: Redundant LDFs.- t: Resuscitate existing LDFs and establish 16 new

ones.

- i: Percentage selected LGAs that have LGA plans

- Project reports.- State Budgets.- Reports from private

sector.- FMLHUD Reports,

State Govt Reports, LGA Reports

Participating States/ LGAs/Communities/CSOs: as in output 1.4.1

MWASD: Coordination, facilitation and


45


support for mobilization including counterpart funding and structure for implementation.

FMLHUD, MFCT, Targeted States, LGs: Ensuring Coordination, facilitation and support for mobilization including counterpart funding and structure for implementation

FMSDIGA: Coordination, facilitation and support for mobilization including counterpart funding and structure for implementation.

Participating States/ LGAs/Communities/CSOs: as in output 1.4.1

Partnerships (PPPs) arrangements.

UNHABITAT- Capacity of States and

LGs to undertake participatory urban governance processes strengthened.

IFAD:- Community Development

Fund (CDF) created as a transparent mechanism for fiscal transfer and allocation of public resources to communities.

- Strengthened capacity of

LGAs to carry out participatory land use planning and rapid market appraisal techniques.

UNITAR.- Capacity building for local

authorities in the functions of the Local Government in the provision and efficient delivery of services.

- Guide LGC in Micro-

Finance and practical approaches to programme implementation.

developed and accessible.- b: TBD - t: TBD- i: Number of targeted States with established

mechanisms for PPP.- b: Zero LGA with existing PPP initiative- t:: 3 LGAs per geo-political zones have PPP

arrangements in place.

- I: Number and type of government authorities sensitized to take deliberate action equitable access to services by children, women and other vulnerable groups.

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of States/LGs with improved capacity and institutions for participatory urban governance

- b: 3 - t: 15

- i: Number of Microfinance aided businesses established within participating LGAs

- b: TBD - t: TBD


46


Outcome 1.5: By 2017, public decision-making for equitable, gender-responsive and evidence-based planning, budgeting, implementation, monitoring and evaluation are effectively coordinated and driven by quality, timely, harmonised, disaggregated data, at Federal, State, and local levels.


Policies, guidelines, plans and budgets supported under this UNDAF (new/revised)State M&E PoliciesOpen Budget Index

As listed below;- I: Number of key policies, guidelines, plans and budgets supported under this UNDAF that are equitable, gender-responsive, and evidence-based.

- b: 0 - t: 10

- i: Number of States with M&E policies at State level.- b: 0 (2012) TBD - t: 24+1

- i: Number of States budget scoring above 50% in OBII:

- b: 1 - t: 3+1

Output 1.5.1: National and State Planning institutions have strengthened capacity for coordination, evidence-based and gender-responsive planning, budgeting, reporting, monitoring, and evaluation on VISION 20:2020, other national priorities and related UNDAF-supported priorities.

UNDP- National Vision 2020

implementation plan/M&E framework is developed at the Federal level

- By 2016 MTDP's (with links to National Vision 20:2020) completed in focus States.

- By 2015 MDGs Acceleration Framework completed at the Federal level and at the level of focus States.

- State GDP computation is regularly completed.

- Capacities for participatory and inclusive planning, M&E, budgeting strengthened at the Federal level and in States.

- Federal and State

- i: Availability of 3rd NIP by 2017- b: : Only 2nd NIP is available - t: 3rd NIP available

- i: Number of States that have completed a MTDP.- b: 2 States have the MTDP as of 2013- t: 6 additional States have completed the MDTP

- i: Number of States that have completed MAF.- b: Zero States have developed MAFs as of 2013- t: 5 States complete the MAF by the end of the cycle.

- I: Number of States with GDP computed.- b: Zero - No State computes their GDP as of 2013 - t: 6 States regularly compute their GDP

- i: Number of planning units at the Federal/State levels that independently produce planning, budgeting and M&E documents.

- b: Possibly one State only has the required capacity; - t: At least 4 State planning units are capable of

producing planning, budgeting, and M&E document

- i: Number of States with functional aid policy/aid monitoring framework.

- b: No State has a functional aid policy/ aid monitoring framework

- t: 5 States and the Federal level develop aid policy

- Medium Term Development Plan, NIP, MAF NBS Publications

- gender equality - JAR & MTR reports- End evaluation report

of NSHDP (2010-15)

MWASD: implementation and coordination

FMOH/SMOH: Policy direction, funding and coordination and implementation. NGOs/CBOs/Donors and private sector: Partnerships and implementation.

MoJ strategic planning, implementation management, monitoring and evaluation in the justice sector.

NPC: Coordination of development partners reporting, M&E, budgeting of the Vision 20:2020.

NPC/SPC to adopt M&E policies; to mainstream M&E within a result based management framework at the government wide level;


47


systems for aid coordination will be strengthened through the institutionalization of aid policy and aid monitoring architecture).

UNODC- Capacity of National

Planning Commission, 10 State planning Commissions, Federal and State MoJ strengthened for strategic planning, project management, and monitoring and evaluation in the justice sector.

UNITAR- NPC, SPC, MDAs with

enhanced capacity to advocate for Participatory Budgeting and Revenue Generation mechanisms

UNICEF- National and State

planning commissions and focus MDAs have strengthened M&E capacities to analyze and use data

and put in place aid monitoring framework

- i: Number of Planning units (NPC, SPC, MDAs) at (a) Federal and (b) State level supported with technical capacity to collect, analyse, plan , monitor and use evidence based data.

- b: 1 planning Institution with relevant strategic planning capacity;

- t: 10 planning institutions.

- I: Number of NPC/SPC that have adopted and translated the M&E policy into implementation plans.

- b: TBD; - t: TBD

- i: Number of States adopting Evaluation Policy- b : 1; - t : 10

Output 1.5.2: Statistical agencies, line MDAs and research institutions are better able to generate, analyse and use quality, timely disaggregated data and make it accessible for evidence-based decision-making and programming

UNDP- Capacities of National

Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and 10 State Statistical Agencies ( SSA's) in collection of regular, reliable and comprehensive statistics strengthened

- NBS Published Sector Statistics

- Research reports- UNDAF/P Annual

reports- National Survey &

Assessment Reports with disaggregated data

NBS: Policy direction and implementation for national and sectoral statistical system strengthening based on the National Strategy for Development of Statistics (NSDS); Generation of macro-economic data and integration of data in budgets and development plans

- i: Number of State Statistical Agencies that regularly publish comprehensive State Statistical Data.

- b: Only 2 States publish comprehensive State Statistical Report (yearbook) in 2013

- t: 8 States publish yearly comprehensive State Statistical Report by 2016

- i: Number of comprehensive sectoral data published by NBS.


48


All Sector MDAs: policy guidance and implementation support.

NDLEA: coordination and implementation on drug production and use.

MoJ: coordination and implementation for justice sector.

IATT/TUGAR: coordination and implementation for anti-corruption research.

NpopC: Conduct of census and population surveys.

MWASD: Coordination, facilitation, counterpart funding and implementation.

NPC: Coordination and policy direction

CSOs: Advocacy and implementation.

SBS: State Bureau of Statistics. Implementation guidance.

UNWOMEN- Capacity of relevant

agencies to generate gender disaggregated data for programming and policy formulation strengthened

ILO- Capacity of NBS, FMoLP

and other relevant MDAs to produce labour market information in line with the ILO standards strengthened.

UNODC- NBS and SBSs have

improved capacity to conduct assessment; monitoring & evaluation activities for the justice sector

- National population surveys on State of Corruption, State of Justice and State of Drug Use in Nigeria conducted.

UNFPA- Enhanced national

capacity to produce, utilize and disseminate high quality statistical data on population dynamics, youth, gender equality including in humanitarian settings

UNICEF- National and States

- b: NBS publishes comprehensive data for only 1 sector in 2013

- t: NBS publishes comprehensive data in about 5 key sectors.

- I: Percentage of sectoral policies informed by evidence generated from research.

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of federal & State institutions with capacity on LMIS and functional Labour Market Information System.

- b: 0 - t: 5 institutions

- i: Number of targeted surveys and assessments conducted.

- b: 0 - t: 3 national population surveys conducted by Q3 2015

- i: No of Government and CSO Agencies with capacity to collect, collate and analyze age and gender disaggregated Population data including rapid assessment in humanitarian settings.

- b: 3 - t: 6

- i: Number and type of core surveys implemented with report published.

- b: 1 - t: 3

- i: Availability of free and universal vital statistics (birth registration) services in targeted areas.

- b: 34.8% (M&F not available yet)- t: 65% (M&F disaggregation available)

- i: Number of core surveys related to situation of Women and Children implemented with report published.

- b: 0: - t: 2


49

Bureau of Statistics or their equivalent have improved capacity to generate statistics and evidence on the situation of women and children in Nigeria

- The registration of births of children under-5 increased by at least 20% point and disparity rates between WQ reduced by at least 30% point

- i: Number of functional States Bureaus of Statistics- b: 0: - t: 3

- i: Number of LGAs that have published statistics and evidences on the situation of Women and Children

- b: TBD- t: TBD

- i: Number of Planning units (NPC, SPC, MDAs) at (a) Federal and (b) State level supported with technical M&E capacity to analyze and use data

- b: TDB- t: (a) 10; (b) 20

- i: Number of States adopting Evaluation Policy- b : 1 t : 10- t: TBD

- i: Number of core surveys related to situation of Women and Children implemented with report published.

- b: 0; - t: 2

- i: Number of functional States Bureaus of Statistics- b: 0 - t: 3

- i: Number of LGAs that have published statistics and evidences on the situation of Women and Children

- .b: TBD - t: TBD



50


Result Area 2: Social Capital DevelopmentStrategic Result/National Development Priority: By 2020, Nigerians are healthy, knowledgeable, highly skilled and productive people, with positive value orientations, living in an inclusive and cohesive society; free from all forms of discrimination, violence and abuse; irrespective of sex, age, geographic location, and socio-economic status; and forming a globally competitive workforce. Support to MDGs 1,2.3 4,5,6,

Outcome 2.1: By 2017, Nigeria's formal and non-formal education system produce increased numbers of graduates with relevant functional, technical and vocational market-driven knowledge and skills; through quality education system informed by evidence, equity based, gender sensitive, innovative policies, plans, systems and programmes at Federal, State, LGA and community levels, supported by adequate funding at each level

- EMIS data - Budget allocations

and disbursements reports by levels of schooling.

- NEMIS 2013; MICS, Vision 2020

- MISC 2011 ; NEMIS- MICS 2011 ; NDHS- MICS 2015

Political commitment; Strategic leadership, funding, Supervision and coordination.

Facilitation, Policy guidance quality assurance and Implementation support.

Coordination and facilitation; Integration of measures to accelerate enrolment and retention.

Voice and accountability, Advocacy, awareness creation.Research and knowledge management, Norms and standards.Documentation and dissemination of best practices.Policy reforms at the State level and funding.Funding and technical assistance from donors.

- UNICEF- UNFPA- WHO- UNAIDS- UNESCO- ILO- UNOPS- FAO- UNDP- UNHCR

- i: Percentage of total graduates who majored in Sciences/Tech, Mathematics and Vocational subjects graduates – disaggregated by level, gender etc

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage of Federal and State budgets allocated to education, disaggregated by formal and non-formal.

- b: TBD- t: TBD

- i: Gender Parity Index (disaggregated by geopolitical zones).

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: GER/NER at ECD, primary and secondary school level.

- b: 86% 2013; - t: 94 (2017)

- i: NAR at ECD, primary and secondary levels. - b: 63 % (NEDS 2010);- t: 70% (2017)

- i: Percentage of learning outcomes in Life Skills, Numeracy, Literacy in primary school and of learning outcomes in Literacy in primary schools, IQE and NFE.

- b: Children numerate: 58% (NEDS 2011): - t: 65% (2017) t: Children literate: 41% (NEDS 2011)



51


- i: Transition rate from lower to higher levels of

schooling.- b: 74% (MICS 2011) - t: 80% (2017)

Output 2.1.1: Advocacy, programming and budgeting capacities of Federal, State and LGA Education stakeholders strengthened to design, cost, mobilize resources, coordinate, monitor and document evidence-based, equity focused, gender responsive education sector strategies, policies, operational plans and innovative models.

- Global Monitoring Report

- NMEC Annual Reports

- National Universities Commission Annual Reports

- State costed SESPs and SESOPs

- State of Education Report

- EFA Report- National Education

Demographic Survey- NEMIS/SEMIS School

inspection and monitoring Reports,

UNESCO Institute of Statistics (UIS): Technical support.

Pole de Dakar/UNESCO BREDA: technical support

FME & SMEs: implementation.

Universities: Rutgers Universities, Obafemi Awolowo University and Gender Studies Centres in Nigeria: facilitation and implementation

JDPC, NCFR: Coordination and facilitation; Integration of measures to accelerate enrolment and retention.

FME: Political commitment ; Strategic leadership funding, Supervision and coordinationState MoE: political commitment, financial resources and implementation.

UBEC: Funding, monitoring, supervision and, implementation

FIS: Supervision, Quality assurance of programme implementation

NTI & NMEC: Advocacy and facilitation.

Universities: Rutgers Universities,

UNESCO- States, LGAs education

stakeholders has strengthened capacities to Develop and implement evidence-based, equity-focused and gender-responsive education sector policies, strategies and plans within a lifelong learning framework – from ECCE to tertiary education.

- Targeted States and LGAs has strengthened capacities in data management/NFE MIS for advocacy in support of literacy and non-formal Education (LNFE).

- FME and SMEs in targeted States have strengthened institutional & technical capacities to develop teacher policies and strategies for more efficient teacher and literacy facilitator utilization.

- Target universities and gender studies Institutes (Master Trainers) have strengthened capacities

- i: Number of States and LGAs with capacity to develop evidence-based, gender-responsive and equity-focused sector policies, strategies and plans with cost simulations.

- b:TBD; - t: TBD

- i: Number of States and LGAs using evidence-based disaggregated education data by gender, urban/rural, geographic locations for advocacy

- b: TBD ; - t: TBD

- i: Number of universities and institutes with capacity gender & leadership approaches.

- b: TBD ; - t: TBD

- i: Number of States conducting comprehensive education sector status reviews and surveys with quality assurance

- b: TBD; - t: TBD

- i: Number of States and LGAs that have and implement updated evidence-based, equity-focused, and gender responsive quality basic education policies and plans.

- b: States: 3; LGA: 0;; - t: States: 13; LGAs:5 LGAs in each of the 13 States

- i: Number of focus States and LGAs that undertake expenditure reviews in line with the annual budget cycles

- b: 0 States, 0 LGAs;; - t: States: 13; LGAs: All in 13 States


52


to develop gender and leadership training modules for increased utilization of the gender perspective in programme development.

- Targeted States have conducted education sector analysis or State/country status reviews determining effectiveness of investments in and efficiency of the State education systems.

UNICEF- CFS sector-wide SESP/

SESOPs/LESOPs that mitigate / respond to emergency implemented in 8 States and 2 LGAs in each of these States by end of 2017.

- Functional data base system/EMIS used to inform policy and planning at all levels in 8 States and 2 LGAs in each of these States by end of 2017.

- Enhanced knowledge

management at State and LGEA levels in 5 GEP States

- Increased capacity to deliver Girl's Education Programme (GEP) Goals

Obafemi Awolowo University and Gender Studies Centres in Nigeria Provision of the training of Master Trainers.

Pole de Dakar/UNESCO BREDA: Partnerships with State officials, some planning departments, population bureaus, etc.


53


Output 2.1.2: Enhanced capacity at all levels of the Federation for the implementation of education sector strategic and operational plans, that increase enrolment and retention of school-aged children (including Early Childhood), and illiterate adults, especially girls, women and other vulnerable groups, through awareness creation, stimulation of demand, enhanced infrastructure and staffing management, and development of models for increased access and affordability.

- National report on child enrolment

- UNDAF/P annual reports

- Global Monitoring Report

- NMEC Reports; - Universities Annual

Reports- UNDAF/P annual

reports- NEDS 2010: NEMIS,- School Inspection and

Monitoring (SIM) Reports; NEMIS/ SEMIS

- NEMIS/SEMIS- School Inspection and

Monitoring (SIM) Reports;

FMoLP: Coordination and implementation.

All Sector MDAs: policy guidance and implementation support. NCCE, NTI & NMEC: technical support and implementation.

FME & SME: policy direction, coordination and implementation.

JDPC, NCFR: Coordination, facilitation and implementation.

FME/NCNE/NCME/UBEC: Strategic leadership, supervision and coordination,

SMoE/SAME/SUBEB: Implementation and funding

BREDAInternational Bureau of Education (IBE): technical support.

- i: Number of additional learning centres with ICT capacities rehabilitated/constructed.

- b: TBD- t: TBD

- i: Number of Focus States and LGAs implementing interventions to increase enrolment for the erstwhile child Labourers, children at the risk of trafficking and disadvantaged.

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of child labourers withdrawn and admitted to school

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of federal and State institutions and community leaders with enhanced capacities for advocacy and community mobilization

- b: TBD- t: TBD

- i: Number of focus States and LGAs implementing interventions to increase enrolment for the boys and girls disadvantaged.

- b: 5 States: 12 LGAs; - t: States: 13; 5 in each of 13 States

- i: Number of boys and girls disadvantaged/ marginalized reached and have access to education

- b: 20,000; - t: 500,000

- i: Number of schools in focus States and LGEAs with functional SBMCs

- b: 3,500; - t: 8,500

- i: Number of Schools implementing Whole school development plans.

- b: 3,50- t: 8,500

ILO- Capacities of the relevant

MDAs, social partners and NGOs enhanced to implement the National Action Plan for the elimination of child labour in Nigeria.

- Capacities of TVET, youth employment institutions and other relevant institutions strengthened for effective delivery of entrepreneurial and skills development (pillar 3)

UNESCO- Federal and States

institutions in target Northern States have strengthened capacity to develop evidence-based advocacy and community mobilization strategies for the rehabilitation and construction of additional learning centers for increased enrolment in formal and non-formal education.

- Federal and State institutions have increased institutional and technical capacity to mobilize and advocate for recruitment of additional education workforce in targeted northern States

UNICEF


54


- 50% of deprived/ marginalized girls and boys enrolled in formal basic education in 13 focus States.

- Non-Formal basic education opportunities (nomadic and IQE schools; NFE centres) have increased capacity to provide basic education to out-of-school boys and girls in 8 focus States.

- 50% of deprived and

marginalized 3-5 year old boys and girls have access to quality early stimulation and learning in 13 focus States

- Increased Parental demand for and support to girls' education"

- Increased basic education opportunities for girls (nomadic and IQE schools; NFE centres) in 5 GEP States"

- Increased and more effective participation of women in providing education in 5 GEP States

UNHCR- Targeted States have

enhanced capacities to increase educational enrolment and retention (formal and non-formal)

- i: Number of non-formal basic education institutions that are functioning/operating in focus States/LGAs

- b: 2,496 in 5 States; 30 LGAs; - t: 9,000 (7,370 in 5 States and 1,630 in 2 additional

new States); 34 LGAs

- i: Percentage deprived and marginalized 3-5 year old boys and girls enrolled in organised ECCE programme.

- b: 41% in 10 Pilot States; LGAs 25 Communities; - t: 60% in States 13; LGAs: 25+

- i: Number of States with technical capacity to promote educational enrolment and retention among persons of concern

- b: TBD- t:TBD


55


among Persons of Concern.

Output 2.1.3: Strengthened human and institutional capacities for child/learner-centred, interactive teaching and quality assurance at all levels of educational service provision in Nigeria, enhance innovativeness, functionality, relevance, market-driven knowledge and skills acquisition and overall child/girl-friendly schooling and transitioning in formal and non-formal schools.

- UNDAF/P Annual reports

- NMEC Annual Reports- EFA Reports- NBTE Annual Reports- NEDS 2011 ; MLA

Reports- NEMIS - School inspection and

monitoring reports, NEMIS, SEMIS

- School inspection and monitoring reports, NEMIS, SEMI

- School inspection and monitoring reports

MDAs and Social partners: Identification of gaps and coordination of intervention. UNESCO Entities: Conduct workshops.

NMEC: participation and coordination of State Agencies' & NGOs/CSOs ..

NBTE: Development of advocacy material Distribution of improved/revised curriculaNBTE. Participation in the capacity building workshops and provision of the NQF.

NMEC & NGOs/CBOsMobilize and provide the officials for the training.National Teachers' Institute (NTI) Mobilization and provision of teachers.

FME/NCNE/NCME/UBEC: Strategic leadership, supervision and coordination, policy; Political will and support for programs.

SMoE/SAME/SUBEB; Implementation of the programme, monitoring, funding, trainings etcUBEC: Funding, Human capacities, monitoring and supervision, implementation of the programmes.

FIS: Supervision /inspection (Quality assurance) of programme implementation

- i: Number of NMEC, State and CSOs with capacity to engage in literacy and NFE programmes

- b: TBD- t:TBD

- I: Number of TVET and youth employment institutions using ILO modules

- b:0 - t:3

- i: Number of lower and senior secondary schools and technical colleges using the NBTE revised curricula.

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of target States implementing the NQF- b: TBD- t:TBD

- i: Number of States/LGAs with capacity to apply CFS methodologies and meet the CFS benchmarks

- b: 55%; - t: 62%

- i; Number of schools in focused States and LGAs with functional quality assurance systems.

- b: TBD; - t: 13+1States and LGAs

- i: Percentage of learning outcomes in (a) Life Skills, (b)Numeracy, (c) Literacy in primary schools, IQE and NFE

- b: State 0; LGAs 0; - t: State: 20% of schools in 13 States.

- i: No of operational learning center by State and LGA- b: TBD- t:TBD

ILO- TVET, youth employment

institutions and other relevant institutions have strengthened capacities for effective use of ILO modules to empower youth.

UNESCO- Capacities of the National

Mass Education Commission (NMEC) and NGOs/CSOs strengthened to engage in literacy and NFE delivery for gender-responsive literacy programmes.

- Capacities of lower and senior secondary schools and technical colleges strengthened to in advocate for the use of the competency-based NBTE revised/improved TVET curricula

- Capacities of target States strengthened for the implementation of the National Qualification framework (NQF).

UNICEF- 60% of Teachers /NFE

facilitators and head teachers apply gender responsive, child centered methods in teaching,


56


reading, learning and school leadership in 8 focus States.

- FME' and SMoEs' minimum quality standards for child friendly schooling adopted and implemented in 50% of the schools in 8 States.

- Target schools in 8 States implement the reading and learning strategies for improved learning.

- Improved teaching and learning Processes and Environment in 5 GEP States

UNOPS - Target LGAs and States

have established Learning centres adequately equipped with standard infrastructure and have proper budget management capacities

Outcome 2.2: By 2017, Health related MDGs achieved and sustained through strong and well-coordinated Health systems implementing innovative, high impact and cost effective, equitable, gender responsive interventions inclusive of foundational determinants of health at community, LGA States and Federal

- JMP 2012, JMP 2015, JMP 2017

- NDHS & GPRHCS- MICS 2011, NDHS,

Immunization coverage surveys

As Listed below;- UNICEF- UNFPA- WHO- UNAIDS- UNESCO- ILO- UNOPS- FAO- UNDP- UNHCR

- i: Percentage of people with access to (a) improved sanitation and (b) improved water supply.

- b: (a) 31%; (b) 58% (JMP2012) - t: (a) 67 (2015), 80 (2020); (b) 80 (2015), 100 (2017

- i: Contraceptive Prevalence Rate. - b: 17.5%: - t: 30%

- i: Proportion of Pregnant Women attending 4 Antenatal and Care visits.

- b: 56.6% - t: 80% (2015


57


levels with active engagement of right holders; informed by South-South cooperation and evidence based learning.

- i: Percentage of pregnant women attended by Skilled birth Attendant at delivery.

- b: 48.7 % - t: 85% (2015)

- i: Percentage of newborns and Mothers visited within 72 hrs of delivery by Skilled Health Care Provider.

- b: TBD t: 50% (2015)

- i: Percentage of infants under 6 months breast fed exclusively.

- b: 15.1% - t: 35%

- i: Proportion of children aged 12-23 months fully immunized.

- b: 27.6% - t: 80%

- i: Percentage of children under 5 with (a) suspected pneumonia, (b) diarrhoea or (c) malaria receiving appropriate treatment from a health provider.

- b: (a)39.7, (b) 36.8, (c) 29.4 - t: 80%

- i: Prevalence of children under 5 years of age that are Underweight.

- b: 24.2% - t: 12.1%

- i: Adolescent Birth Rate (per thousand). - b: 89 - t:TBD

- i: Number of New Wild Polio Virus Cases. - b: 118 - t:0

- I: Percentage of children under 5 and pregnant women who slept under a LLIN the previous night.

- b: 16.4 - t: 80


58


Output 2.2.1: Public agencies and Civil Society Organizations at federal, State, and LGA levels are able to implement updated, harmonized, evidence based, gender responsive policies and plans to facilitate equitable access to quality water supply and sanitation services and the practice of good hygiene by vulnerable populations and institutions based on innovative communication for development and coordination systems

WHO - Capacities of Public

institutions strengthened to harmonize policies and plans for managing environmental sanitation and its health impacts.

UNHCR- Targeted persons of

concern have increased access to quality water, sanitation and adopted quality hygiene practices

UNICEF- Strengthened political

commitment, accountability and capacity at national/ sub-national levels to develop and adopt equitable and gender-sensitive policies, budgeted plans in select under-served States for scaling up of WASH interventions to promote safe drinking water, adequate sanitation and good hygiene practices.

- Focus States/ LGAs have increased capacity and deliver services to ensure children and women have sustained and equitable access to improved water sources.

- Focus States/ LGAs have increased capacity and deliver services to ensure children and women have

- FMOH policies & plans

- National/ State reports;

- National strategy on Open Defecation

- Draft State WASH sector investment plans

- WASH Sector reports/- UNDAF/P Annual

reports; - National CLTS

database- NEMA reports- SMoED and SUBEB

reports- SMoH reports

FMOH: Norms and standards, policy direction.

FMWR: Policy direction, coordination, funding and implementationSMWR: State level policy reforms, funding and implementationRWSA (Rural Water Supply & Sanitation Agencies): implementation.

FMEdu: implementation in schools.

MoH/ SMoH: implementation in health facilities.

LGA WASH Dept: Implementation at the community level.

NGOs/ CSOs: Voice and accountability and implementation Traditional leaders/ Faith leaders: awareness creation.

Academia: Research and knowledge management.

Ministry of Information/ Media: documentation and dissemination of best practices.

- i: Number of States with gender-sensitive WASH policies and incorporate international norms and standards.

- b: 12 - t: 20

- i: Number of States with gender-sensitive WASH policies/ Investment Plans

- b: 12; - t: 18

- i: National strategy for eliminating Open Defecation is available

- b: 0. t: 1

- i: Number of LGAs implementing LGA-wide approach to achieving ODF status

- b: 38; - t:140.

- I: Total budget for basic sanitation as a % of GDP - b: <0.5% of GDP ;- t: 0.5% of GDP

- i: Number of people (male/female) provided with access to improved source of drinking water

- b: 4.5 million; - t:7.3 million

- i: Number of States adopting community approaches for effective water services (VLOM)

- b: 6 - t:20

- i: Number of communities implementing water safety plan

- b:40 - t:490

- i: Number of sector professionals trained on community approaches, water quality monitoring & surveillance, climate change, VLOM, etc.

- b:0;


59


sustained and equitable access to improved sanitation and hygiene.

- Increased national/ sub-national capacity to deliver services ensuring children and women have protected and reliable access to sufficient safe water, sanitation and hygiene facilities in humanitarian situations.

- Focus States/ LGAs have increased capacity and deliver child friendly, gender-sensitive WASH services in schools and public health institutions to ensure children and women have sustained access to safe water, sanitation and hygiene facilities.

- t:1000

- i: Number of people (male/female) living in Open Defecation Free (ODF) certified communities

- b:2.21 million - t: 4.21 million

- i: Number of people (male/female) living in ODF certified communities through scaling up efforts

- b: NA; - t: 1million

- i: Number of people (male/female) with access to improved sanitation

- b: 2.5 million; - t: 4.0 million

- i: Number of LGA WASH Departments/ Units with trained CLTS facilitators

- b: 38; - t: 160

- i: Number of States adopting community approaches to total sanitation

- b:30 - t: 36

- i: Number of people (male/ female) including school children and health workers reached with hygiene promotion interventions.

- b: 0 - t: 4 million

- i: Number of sector professionals trained on sanitation and hygiene approaches

- b:0 - t:1,000

- i: Number of people in humanitarian situations who access and use improved water sources, adequate gender-sensitive sanitation and hygiene facilities

- b:0 - t:200,000


60


- i: Number of States with sector coordination mechanism for humanitarian situations

- b:TBD - t:30

- i: Number of schools provided with WASH facilities that meet the national standards

- b:1,388 - t:3,888

- i: Number of Primary Health care centres provided with WASH facilities that meet the national standards

- b;0 - t:800- i: Number of schools in States with functional

Environment Health Clubs- b;2,615 - t:5,115

Output 2.2.2: Capacities of government and partners at all levels including inter-sectoral linkage and coordination are strengthened to implement high impact, equitable, gender responsive and innovative nutrition and food security interventions, enhance nutrition friendly agricultural productivity especially at household level and promote crop and livestock diversification to improve nutrition outcomes (reduced stunting, acute malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies rates) amongst most vulnerable groups especially children and women

WHO - Federal and States and

LGAs have strengthened capacities to develop, implement and monitor national action plans and policies on maternal, infant and young child nutrition, in line with the international standards on maternal, infant and young child nutrition (e.g. food-based dietary guidelines, guidelines on micronutrient supplementation and fortification)

- Federal and States commit predictable funding to to food and nutrition security; in line international and regional

- National/ State reports;

- MICS & DHS & SMART surveys


- KAP study reports- CFNS, MN - Government strategic

documents on nutrition

FMARD: Policy direction and guidance coordination, funding and political commitments.

SMAgric: policy reforms at the State level and funding.

SMEdu: implementation

MoH and SMoH: implementation LGA Agric Department: Implementation

NGOs/ CSOs: voice and accountability and implementation at the community level

Traditional leaders/ Faith leaders: awareness creation Academia: Research and knowledge management.

- i: Number of federal, State and LGA institutions with capacity to develop, implement and monitor nutrition action plan and policies;

- b: TBD - t:TBD

- i: Percentage of State budgets earmarked for food and nutrition security;

- b: TBD - t:TBD

- i: Prevalence of chronic malnutrition (stunting), disaggregated by zone (NC, NE,NW,SE, SS & SW, and by gender, age group and wealth quintile)

- b: 35% - t: 20%

- i: Percentage of severely malnourished children reached with CMAM treatment with focus in 11 Northern States and at least 2 Southern States increased

- b: 10% - t: 30%


61


Ministry of Information/ Media: documentation and dissemination of best practices to sensitize wider community on nutrition issues.

guidelines

UNICEF - Community management

of acute malnutrition programme and nutrition sensitive interventions scaled-up in priority States and the prevalence of wasting (GAM) among children under-five years (both girls and boys) reduced to less than 5 percent

- Proportion of 0-23 month children (both girls and boys) optimally fed increased to 70 percent through integrated IYCF and care promotion.

- Micronutrient deficiencies prevented through improved micronutrient supplementation interventions for women and children (both girls and boys).

- Leadership, policy, institutional capacity and partnership strengthened to scale up nutrition interventions targeted towards the vulnerable groups (especially women and children)

FAO- Federal and State MDAs

have strengthened

- i: Proportion of severely malnourished children benefitting from food security, cash transfer and livelihood initiatives.

- b: TBD - t:TBD

- i: Nutrition EPRP developed and operationalized- b: 0 - t: 1

- i: Prevalence of children under 5 years of age who are stunted. I: National

- b: 34.8 (MICS 2011); - t: 30.0%

- i: Zonal NW and NE- b:: 53% (MICS 2011); - t:: 30.0%

- i: Proportion of 0-6month children exclusively breast-fed disaggregated by zone (NC, NE,NW,SE, SS & SW, and by gender and age group)

- b: 15%; - t: 70%

- i: Number of Children 6-23 months receiving minimum acceptable (meal frequency + dietary diversity)

- b:15%; - t: 70%

- i: Number of community groups supported to assist mothers to appropriately feed children under 2 years

- b: 500; - t: 2,409

- i: Number of community groups/sites supported to alleviate food insecurity

- b: 220; - t: 10,000

- i: Number of children aged 6-59 months receiving Vitamin A supplementation and deworming biannual


62


capacity on the application of standard methodologies and food security information tools to develop and implement cross-sectoral gender responsive policies and investment programmes for food and nutrition security

- Public and private sector awareness increased on food safety and quality systems including Codex Alimentarius

- Public and Private sector agencies have strengthened capacity to review and update agricultural bio-security systems.

coverage, disaggregated by zone (NC, NE,NW,SE, SS & SW and gender and age group)

- b: 65%; - t: 95%

- i: Micronutrient Powder supplementation of 6-23 months piloted in 2 States with over 50% coverage and national scale up plan developed

- b: 0 State; - t: 2 States

- i: Number of functional National and States food and nutrition committees

- b: 0; - t: 27

- i: Public funding for Nutrition at Federal, States and LGAs increased by at least 30% of the Ministries Departments and Agencies

- b: US$10million; - t:30% increace

Output 2.2.3: Capacities of public and private health institutions including Civil Society Organizations at all levels strengthened to deliver accessible, equitable, quality, gender-responsive, evidence-based and, adequately funded, reproductive ,maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health interventions inclusive of sexual reproductive health; using innovations and appropriate technology (including new vaccines and ICT) and responding to increased demand and


- NDHS, MICS, NICS- Research Reports

and Publications- Joint Annual Reviews

(JAR) NHMIS reports - Logistics

Management Information System (LMIS) reports

- GPRHCS Survey Report

- Jointt Annual Reviews/ Monitoring and Administrative Reports

- Logistics Management

Funds, Foundations, Multilateral and Bilateral organizations in health sector: funding and technical assistance

FMoH & NPHCDA: policy direction, funding, coordination and implementation.

SMOH/SPHCDA: Implementation Civil Societies: awareness creation, voice and accountability NCFR: Coordination and facilitation and implementation.

Research Institutions: research, knowledge management.

LGAs: implementation,

- i: Proportion of LGA with capacity to conduct high sensitive AFP surveillance

- b; 90% - t: 100 %

- i: Proportion of LGAs with capacity to conduct and monitor quality polio SIAs (house-hold based approach)

- b: 85% - t : 100 %

- i: Proportion of LGAs with capacity to deliver quality routine immunization services

- b: 71% - t: 90%.

- I: Proportion of States and LGAs with evidence-based, gender sensitive policies and costed plans for RMNCH interventions along continuum of care.

WHO- Capacity of federal and

State MDAs improved for effective planning, implementation, monitoring for Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance

- Federal, State and LGAs have enhanced capacity for high quality planning, implementation and monitoring and evaluation of polio SIAs, including documentation and dissemination of best practices; response to outbreaks


63


use of preventive, curative and promotive health services by empowered and involved communities; supported by enhanced Health Management

Information System (LMIS)

- SIAs data MICS/NDHS

Joint Annual Reviews/ Monitoring and Administrative Reports

- Joint Annual Reviews/ Monitoring and Administrative Reports

FMOH Planning Division: Policy direction, coordination and monitoring.

Development partners: TA at implementation at all levels.

Civil society, Health development partners to provide support and the platform for end-user reporting.

FMOH, NPHCDA and SMOH: provide coordination and leadership at the States and LGA levels.

PHCDA, SMOHs /SPHCDAs, LGAs: to develop and operationalize strategies and plans to reduce number of child morbidity and mortality with support from UN, EU, USAID DFID, JICA and other health development partners.

PHCDA, SMOHs /SPHCDAs, LGAs, to develop and operationalize strategies and plans to reduce missed children with support from UNICEF, WHO, Rotary, JICA and other polio partners

NPHCDA, SMOHs/SPHCDAs, LGAs, to develop and operationalize strategies and plans to reduce missed children with support from UN Rotary, JICA and other polio partners

NPHCDA, SMOHs /SPHCDAs,

- Federal, State and LGAs have strengthened capacity for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluation of routine immunization activities including periodic intensification (PIRI)

- Federal, States and LGAs have enhanced technical and institutional capacity to design, planning, cost, budget, implement and monitor of quality and cost effective interventions for MNCH from pre-pregnancy to postpartum period.

- Federal, States and academia have enhanced capacity for research, evidence generation and knowledge management reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health, and other health conditions.

UNICEF- Strengthened political

commitment, accountability and national capacity to legislate, plan and budget for scaling up of health interventions

- Increased national capacity to provide access

- b; 43% - t: 100%

- i: Percentage of national budget (% of GDP) and per capita allocations to health at federal, State and LGAs with disaggregation by key programmes (RMNCH, Malaria, HIV, etc)

- b.6% and $10 per capita - t:15% and $32 per capita

- i: Proportion of LGA with capacity for implementing quality IMCI

- b; 43% - t: 100%

- i: Number of LGAs implementing ICCM- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Proportion of States with capacity to use sub-analyzed SRH data from NHMIS for programming.

- b: 5% - t: 50%

- i: Number of operational research and studies in RMNCH supported.

- b: 3 - t: 15

- i: Number of States with costed implementation I i: Plans for maternal, newborn and child health care developed or revised policies for home visits for newborns (first week of life) developed, revised, implemented and monitored

- b: TBD - t: 1 national, 16 States

- i: Number of States that routinely monitor progress on maternal, newborn and child survival against a set of common matrices (using national countdowns, scorecards or related processes):

- b: TBD; - t: 1 national, 16 State


64


to essential high-impact maternal and newborn health interventions

- .Increased national capacity to provide access to essential high-impact child health interventions

- Increased national capacity to provide access to essential immunization services

- Increased national capacity to contribute significantly to the Polio Eradication Initiative

- Enhanced support for children, caregivers and community stakeholders, for improved healthy behaviors towards Polio eradication

- Enhanced support for children and caregivers, from pregnancy to adolescence, for improved healthy behaviors

- Increased country capacity and delivery of services to prevent excess mortality among girls, boys and women in humanitarian situations and high burden LGAs

UNFPA- Federal, States and LGAs

LGAs: develop and operationalize strategies and plans to reduce number of child morbidity and mortality with support from UN, EU, USAID DFID, JICA and other health development partners. Working with the Federal Ministry of Information as coordinating Government organ

- i: Number of States with at least 60% of mothers and newborns in targeted areas receiving postnatal care within two days of childbirth

- b:: TBD - t: 1 national, 16 States

- i: Number of LGAs implementing policy for PNC/home visits to newborns within 72 hrs

- b: 0 - t: 320

- i: Proportion of health facilities supported experiencing no stock-outs of key tracer maternal and newborn health commodities in the last one month.

- b: TBD - t: 60%

- i: Proportion of children aged 12-23 months who received 3 doses of DPT/Penta-containing antigen and first dose of measles antigen (national) and in supported high burden States

- b::DPT3 /Penta3 (National – 35% Measles (National-41%)

- t: DPT3 and Measles – 87%

- i: Proportion of scheduled Polio campaigns with appropriate vaccine type & quantity delivered to national Govt. at least one week before implementation

- b:: 100% - t: 100%

- i: Percentage of children 0-5yrs missing polio vaccination due to refusals (non-compliance)

- b: 2.1% - t:: <1%

- i: Proportion of health facilities supported experiencing no stock-outs of key tracer maternal and newborn health commodities in the last one month.

- b: TBD - t:: 60%


65


have strengthened technical and institutional capacity to deliver emergency obstetric and newborn care, including in humanitarian situations

- Federal, State and LGAs have enhanced technical and institutional capacity to prevent and treat obstetric fistula and to promote the social reintegration of fistula patients

- Federal, State and LGAs have strengthened capacity to deliver reproductive health commodity security, including quality family planning services.

- i: Number of un-immunized children- b: TBD- t: TBD

- i: Exclusive breastfeeding rate up to 6 months- b: 17.4%; - t: 50%

- i: Number and percentage of targeted families in humanitarian situations that receive two insecticide-treated nets in malaria-endemic areas

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number and percentage of targeted children 6-59 months (or 6 months to 15 years in affected areas) in humanitarian situations vaccinated against measles

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of health facilities with standard minimal stock of Emergency Health Kits and supplies

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage of health facilities supported to meet the minimum requirements for basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric and neonatal care in targeted States

- b, 10%; - t, 60%

- i: Percentage of health facilities with capacity to deliver emergency obstetric and neonatal care in targeted States

- b, 10%; - t, 70%

- i: Number of community-led and non-governmental organizations addressing the sexual and reproductive health needs of young people and most at risk populations.


66


- b, 5%; - t, 15%

- i: Number of fistula clients repaired at supported sites- b:, 1,083; - t: Cumulative: 3,083

- i: Number of Fistula centers with capacity and skills for fistula repair

- b: 5 ; - t: 10

- i: Percentage of service-delivery points in focus States with no stock-outs of modern contraceptives within the last six months

- b 44%; - t 25%

- i: Percentage of health facilities with capacity to deliver modern contraceptive technology at supported sites

- b: 15%; - t: 80%

Output 2.2.4: Capacities of Federal, State, LGAs, Civil Society Organizations, Academia, and private sector are strengthened to plan, update and implement relevant standards and guidelines for Communicable and Non Communicable Disease services utilizing innovative technologies; informed by gender responsive policies, funded and disseminated research, with application of communication strategies to increase awareness and demand; enhance disease

- Administrative data (IDSR reports)

- Program reports

FMOH to coordinate, implement, Monitor and evaluate

WHO - Federal, States and LGAs

have enhanced capacities to develop multi-sectoral policies and costed plans for prevention and control of communicable and non-communicable diseases (malaria, NTDs, TB.

- Updated policy and treatment guidance in place for technical guidelines on HIV-related tuberculosis, delivery of care for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, tuberculosis

- i: Proportion of LGAs reporting comprehensive disease surveillance data in a timely manner.

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Proportion of Health facilities, LGAs and States generating and transmitting data to the national level using standard National Management Information System (NHMIS) tools

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: No of States with capacity to develop strategic plan for NCDs

- b: TBD - t: TBD- i: Percentage of States conducting OR and using OR

findings to guide policy formulation- b: TBD


67


surveillance and ensure timely response to outbreaks.

diagnostic approaches, tuberculosis screening in risk groups and integrated community-based management of tuberculosis.

- t: TBD

- i: Number of States and LGAs with capacity to implement neglected developing tropical diseases plans and policies

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Availability of updated Policy guidance on HIV-Related tuberculosis, delivery of care for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, tuberculosis

Outcome 2.3: By 2017, HIV transmission reduced in all key populations (particularly women, children and young people) , MTCT eliminated, condition of people living with HIV improved, through the implementation of effective innovative HIV prevention and mitigation policies, strategies, strong multi-sectoral partnerships and coordination; and active involvement of stakeholders at all levels.

- NARHS 2018,- MICS 2016 - NARHS 2007, MICS

2012; MICS 2016- GARP Report,


- i: HIV prevalence in the general population (NARHS) .- b: 3.6% - t:2.7%

- i: Proportion of Adolescents and young people with comprehensive knowledge for HIV prevention.

- b: 15–19: 19.7% (F), 28.2% (M) NARHS 2007- 21.9 (MICS 2012) 20 – 24 yrs: 24.8% (F), 37.2%(M)- 23% (MICS 2012) - t: TBD

- i: Percentage of child HIV infections from HIV-positive women delivering in the past 12 months.

- b: 19.8% - t: 0

As Listed below;

Output 2.3.1: National coordination mechanisms and partnerships strengthened to promote an equitable enabling environment for PLHIV implement innovative policies and plans and establish logistic management systems through enhanced leadership capacity

UNDP- NACA and SACAs have

strengthened institutional capacity to develop and implement National and State costed Strategic Plans on HIV

- Strengthened capacity of CSOs, PLWHIV & Key Populations capacities to advocate for anti-stigma legislation and facilitate its implementation


- HIV related Anti-stigma Laws,

- Reviewed Policy - NASA, GARPR- JARs

NACA: coordination of mulit-sectoral national HIV response

FMoLP: Coordination and Facilitation:

NECA, NLC and TUC: implementation.

SACAs: coordination of mulit-sectoral State HIV response;

FMOH and SMOHs: coordination and implementation of health

- i: Percentage of States with SSPs aligned with the PCRP

- b; TBD - t: 12+ 1 State Plans aligned with PCRP

- i: Percentage of States with Anti-Stigma & Discrimination legislation

- b; TBD - t: Anti-Stigma & Discrimination laws passed in at

least 3 supported States

- i: Proportion of targets achieved in the Global health strategy

- b; TBD


68


WHO- Federal and States

capacity strengthened to implement and monitor the Global health sector strategy on HIV/AIDS 2011-2015.

ILO- Capacity of federal &

State institutions enhanced to review, implement and monitor the National Workplace HIV and AIDS Policy

UNAIDS- Strengthened structures

of Federal and State partnership platforms (Prevention, treatment, PMTCT,M&E TWGs) to coordinate HIV service delivery

- Resources for implementation of HIV and PMTCT prevention programmes for adolescents and young people mobilised to close the resource gap by 2015 and increase annual domestic contribution to 50%

UNOPS - An HIV Electronic Health

Management System developed with a Central Data Collection system.

- t: TBD

- i: Draft National HIV and AIDS Workplace policy reviewed.

- b: TBD - t: 1

- i: Percentage of domestic contribution (as % of GDP) to national HIV expenditure

- b; 25% - t: 50%

- i: Percentage of UN focused States with HIV programme dedicated budget lines and costed Annual Operational Plans on HIV aligned with the PCRP (Presidential Comprehensive Response Plan on HIV/AIDS)

- b; 0 - t: National & 12+ 1 States

- i: Existence of an Electronic Health Management System and Central Data Collection system

- b; TBD - t: 1

- i: Number of federal and State institutions with capacity to develop and implement a National Policy and regulatory framework on HIV Aids Supply Chain Management & Quality Control.

- b; 12+1 State require strengthening of the SCM & Logistics systems

- t: SCMS Policy/Strategy developed and implementation commenced in 2014

sector response.

USG ( PEPFAR, CDC, and USAID): funding and technical.


69


Output 2.3.2: The capacity of institutions strengthened for increased Behavior Change Communication and demand creation for HIV prevention, treatment, care and support services in the general population in an equitable manner.

- Capacity of federal and

State ministries and counterparts improved to develop relevant policy and regulatory framework for a National Policy” on HIV Aids Procurement Supply Chain Management & Quality Control


- NACA and annual reports

- SACA and SASCP report

- IBBSS- Radio/TV Scripts

and slots reports

FMoLP: Coordination and implementation for workplace related issues.

Radio, Television and Theatre Workers' Union (RATTAWU): implementation.

SACA: Coordination, funding and implementation

FME; implementation

RATTUWU: implementation

- I: Number of public and private sector institutions with capacity to deliver HIV prevention, care and treatment interventions

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of people who have undertaken Provider Initiated Testing and Counseling

- b; 26% of persons have ever been tested - t: 1,000,000 people

- i: Number of Workplaces with referral linkages to treatment services to ensure the continuum of care in identified, workplaces/ institutions

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of workers who have undertaken voluntary HIV Testing and Counseling

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of national, State and LGA prevention TWGs with capacity to deliver a combination prevention package

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number and type of Radio and TV stations producing and airing Radio/TV scripts on HIV/AIDS

- b; TBD - t: TBD

ILO- Public and Private sector

institutions have increased ability to deliver required services/interventions in the Workplace

UNAIDS- National, State and LGA

Prevention Technical Working Groups have enhanced capacities to increase access to the Combination Prevention Package at State and LGA levels

UNESCO- HIV.AIDS information

mainstreamed into Radio/TV script and productions


70


Output 2.3.3: Increased capacity at Federal State and LGA level for coordination, integration and delivery of quality eMTCT services, promotion of community involvement and data collection and management systems.

- Policy - HMIS, Reports- Survey reports - UNDAF/P annual

reports- Minutes of States

PMTCT TWGs- Service Provision &

DQA Reports- HMIS Actual plans

developed- Minutes of States - Service Provision &

DQA Reports

Select State Governments to make available Health Institutions and financial support;

UNAIDS/NACA/FMoH provide TA and needed coordination

USF, NGOs, UNAIDS,

NACA: Coordination, policy direction and funding at national; levelStates MoH and, SACA: Coordination and implementation

WHO- Capacity of federal and

State institutions strengthened to adapt, and implement most up-to-date norms and standards in preventing and treating paediatric and adult HIV infection,

- Federal and State capacity strengthened to generate and systematically use strategic information through national information systems and routine programme monitoring, in line with global norms and standards

UNAIDS/WHO- National and State level

capacity strengthened to generate and systematically use strategic information through national information systems and routine programme monitoring, in line with global norms and standards for PMTCT

- Federal, targeted States and LGAs have strengthened capacity for PMTCT data management and periodic data Quality Assessments.

- i: Number of federal and State institutions with capacity to adapt and implement integrated HIV programmes in line with WHO 2013 guidelines for ART & PMTCT

- b; Process of adapting new WHO 2013 guidelines is currently on-going

- t: TBD

- i: Percentage of LGAs reporting quality and timely eMTCT data within the HMIS

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage of LGAs utilising findings from quarterly data quality assessments to review and improve targeted systems

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- Number of States Ministries of Health with capacity in sustainable procurement and supply chain management

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage of antenatal care settings/facilities in selected States that offer HIV testing and ART ( PMTCT)

- b; TBD - t: at least 80%

- i: Percentage of HIV-positive pregnant women receiving ART to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV in selected States

- b; 20% - t: 90%

- i: Percentage of adults and children requiring treatment for HIV and receiving ART (disaggregated by age and sex) in selected States

- b; 36% (12% - children, adult - 33%) - t: 90%


71


UNOPS - States Ministries of

Health have strengthened capacity in Procurement and Supply Chain Management for PMTCT

UNICEF- Partners at the Federal

level and in focus States have increased commitment and strengthened systems for scaled-up delivery of integrated PMTCT and Paediatric HIV services

UNFPA- Targeted Federal and

States MDAs and private sector institutions have strengthened capacity in implementing integrated RH/HIV/AIDS services with eMTCT as an entry point for indicated women and married adolescents.

- i: Number of facilities providing integrated RH-HIV services in line with national guidelines

- b; TBD - t: at least 50%

- i: Number of public and private sector institutions with capacity to provide integrated RH-HIV/AIDS services.

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of clients accessing HIV/AIDS services who also accessed RH services in same facility or by referral.

- b; TBD - t: TBD

Output 2.3.4: Increased capacity of key institutions for equitable delivery of combination prevention interventions for adolescents and young people, especially the most at risk and those living with HIV, through inclusive strategic partnerships and coordination platforms that support innovative knowledge management and demand creation.

- Copy of training modules

- Training reports- Prevention TWG

meeting minutes; - National Prevention

Plan evaluation report- Survey reports, - IBBSS/Epidemic

Appraisals- Training modules

FME: Facilitation and implementation

Youth-led and focused organizations: implementation.

NACA: Coordination, policy direction.

SACA coordination at State level.

FMoH, SMoH, NYSC, MOE: implementation.USG: funding and Technical Assistance.

- i: Number of updated and effective guidelines for sexual and reproductive health with linkages to HIV and congenital syphilis, adolescent health policies and strategies and adolescent health friendly services

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of youth led organizations with capacity to mainstream HIV/AIDS into relevant programmes.

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage of schools implementing HIV life skills curriculum, e.g. the Family Life and HIV Education curriculum or NYSC peer Education.

WHO- Public and private sector

institutions have enhanced capacity to adapt and implement guidelines for sexual and reproductive health with linkages to HIV and congenital syphilis, adolescent health policies and strategies and adolescent health friendly services;


72


UNESCO/UNICEF- Public and private

institutions in education sector have strengthened capacity in mainstreaming HIV/AIDS prevention into formal and non-formal education sectors through development of training modules and training of youths and youth-led organizations in formal and informal educational sectors

UNICEF: - Partners at the Federal

level and in focused States have increased commitment and strengthened systems for scaled-up delivery of HIV combination prevention, treatment and care services for adolescents

UNFPA- Federal and State

government institutions have an improved capacity to deliver gender sensitive and equitable HIV prevention information and services for young people especially the most at risk populations

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of States with Prevention Technical Work Group rolling out combination prevention package (costed plans, BCC/demand creation strategy, monitoring tools, HCT age and sex disaggregated data)

- b; 0 - t: 7+1 selected States

- i: Number of States with capacity to deliver gender sensitive and age appropriate HIV prevention information and services to young people.

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of young people and adolescents accessing HIV prevention information and services disaggregated by age and gender

- b; TBD - t: TBD

Output 2.3.5: Gender disaggregated strategic knowledge generated and required tools and mechanisms put in place at

- NACA and SACA reports

- Annual HIV Report cards

- Capacity Assessment

FMoLP: implementation

NBS: data generation

NECA, NLC, TUC: implementation

- i: Number and type of disaggregated data generated for HIV programming

- b; TBD - t: TBD

WHO - Federal and State

institutions have strengthened capacity : to use national information


73


NACA: coordination, funding and facilitation

SACA/SPTWG: Coordination of partners at State level NYNETHA and other YFOs:: implementation and monitoring.

NGOs/CBOs: Service delivery

and evidence-based data to inform policy and programme implementation and budgeting

- Public and private sector institutions have strengthened capacity for comprehensive monitoring of the country health situation, trends and determinants, using global standards; and leadership in the new data generation and analyses of health priorities

ILO- National institutions have

enhanced capacity to generate gender disaggregated data on workers tested for HIV.

UNAIDS- National and State Joint

Annual Reviews (NASA and GARPR) conducted using Data Quality Assessments approaches

UNICEF /UNFPA/WHO- Selected States have

strengthened capacity to conduct strategic and gender sensitive operational research on SRH/HIV and PMTCT

UNICEF- High quality innovation,

- i: Number and type of HIV monitoring reports published by public and private sector institutions

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number and type of joint reviews conducted for HIV programmes

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number and type of operational research reports published with Gender disaggregated data

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: NASA and GARP reports available- b; 1 - t: 1 Yearly

- i: National Gender assessment report published- b; 0 - t: 1 report

- i: Number of States with routine monitoring mechanisms set up for MARPs

- b; 0 - t: 22

- i: Percentage of supported States which have disaggregated data on ART coverage among adolescents aged 10-14 years and 15-19 years by sex

- b; 0 - t: 100%


74


Outcome 2.4: By 2017, inequities in the Nigerian society are reduced; driven by well informed and committed leadership; through innovative, inclusive, well co-ordinated and evidence-based national social protection framework; enabled by context-specific, rights-based, age-appropriate, gender-sensitive policies which empower and protect the most vulnerable and at risk populations.

- National Budget and Implementation reports, National Economic Reports,

- NLSS; Special reports, NBS

- National Orphan and Vulnerable Children survey (FMOWASD)

- Perception surveys; NDHS

- NDHS

As Listed below;

evidence generation and knowledge management are supporting advocacy and leveraging resources for an equitable programming on Children and Adolescent and HIV

- i: Government spending on Social Protection as a % of total government expenditure (including capital investment and subsidy contributions) at federal, State and LGA levels.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage % of households in the bottom two quintiles with increased income.

- b:TBD - t: 30%

- i: Percentage of children living in poor households. - b: TBD - t: 30% reduction.

- I: Participating households indicate increased levels of trust, satisfaction and cooperation at community levels.

- b: TBD; - t: Yes

- i: Percentage households living below poverty line and in extreme poverty.

- b: TBD - t: TBD (30% reduction in vulnerability)


All sector MDAs: implementation

FMoLP: Coordination and Facilitation of capacity building.

NPC: coordination at the federal level and policy direction.

UNDP- 10 focus States and the

Federal governments have in existence Social Protection Framework (Federal) and implement Social Policies and Social Assistance

Output 2.4.1: Age-appropriate and Gender-sensitive, fiscally sustainable National social protection policy and framework developed based on context-specific, innovative, replicable and

- i: Number of States with social protection policies and functioning social assistance strategies.

- b; No States has developed a Social Protection Framework and implementing a credible social assistance strategy

- t: At least five partner States are implementing credible social assistance strategies and have social protection framework.

- Policy; Evaluation Reports for Social Assistance


- Social Protection Policy and Framework

- SP Bill


75


Output 2.4.2: Capacities of public and community institutions, including CSOs are enhanced to design, implement, monitor and evaluate social protection mechanisms at all levels; translating to increased utilization of accessible and affordable essential social services


- State Child Protection Systems Mapping Reports

- State Social Welfare Workforce Gap analysis reports

- Child Protection information management system reports

- CPN monthly reports- mechanism TBD with

government- Impact assessments- National and

Regional Adolescent profile

Strategies (State level)

ILO- Social protection policy

and bill developed and aligned with the Social Protection Floor and Decent Work Agenda

UNICEF- A welfare inclusive age

appropriate and gender sensitive, fiscally sustainable National Social Protection Policy framework based on contributions from State specific context and evidence developed by Government and CSOs

- I: Number of States with Gender responsive SP models and interventions supported, piloted, documented and evaluated to inform policy formulation (both the comprehensive National social protection policy and framework and the SP Bill).

- b; 2 States - t: 6 States

- I: Availability of SP Bill on social protection policy to NASS and FEC.

- b; 0 - t: 1 Bill & Policy

- I: Number of States with capacity, to integrate social welfare workforce parameters into the social protection framework and its implementation.

- b; 0 - t: 6 + 1

FMoLP: Coordination and Facilitation

NISER: facilitation and technical support

NCFR: implementation and technical support

JDPC: implementation and technical support.

Action Aid Nigeria: technical support F/SMWASD: policy direction coordination and implementation

Child Protection Network: coordination of civil society organizations' active participation.

F/SMOH: policy direction,

WHO - Capacities of national and

State health and related institutions strengthened to design, implement and monitor social protection mechanisms

ILO- The capacity of FMoLP,

social partners (e.g. employers' associations and trade unions) and other relevant institutions enhanced to design implement and monitor social protection mechanism

UNICEF- Government and CSO

technical capacities in social protection

- i: Percentage of relevant MDAs and social partners with capacity to design, implement, monitor and evaluate social protection mechanisms.

- b; TBD - t: 50% of relevant MDAs and social partners

- i: Percentage of States with designed and costed SP/CP programs.

- b; 0 - t: 25

- i: Percentage of States supported to have SP/CP programs designed and costed

- b: TDB; - t: TDB

- i: Number of States with functioning child protection systems in targeted areas offering integrated preventive and response services.

- b; 0 - t: 6 States + FCT

evidence-based models. AAN: facilitating community mobilization and awareness creation on the policy.

African Centre for Leadership and Centre for Social and Legislative Advocacy: guidance on the legislative component.

Nigerian Institute for Social and


76


coordination and implementation.initiatives, strengthened to design and implement social protection initiatives.

- States have undertaken a gender review profile of the child and social protection policies/strategies in the current national development plan cycle.

- The capacity to plan and manage social welfare workforce, finance and gender-/age-appropriate services of child protection systems to prevent and respond to violence, abuse, exploitation and neglect strengthened at Federal, State and LGA level

- Capacity of CSOs, government and community institutions improved to design, implement and M&E social protection initiatives including those aimed at ensuring healthy lifestyle for adolescents

UNFPA- Capacities of selected

public and community institutions enhanced to design, implement, monitor and evaluate social protection

- i: Number of States that undertake gender review profile of child and social protection policies/strategies

- b; 0 - t: 6 States + FCT

- i: Number of States with mechanisms for monitoring the situation of adolescents, including their access to social protection, and carrying out adolescent profiles to inform policy-making.

- b; 0 - t: 6 + 1

- i: Number of States with capacity to design, implements, and evaluate social protection, mechanisms targeted at women and young girls

- b; 9 - t: 18 States

- i: National IDP policy is adopted- b; 0 - t: 1

- i: Number of States budget scoring above 50% in OBI (Open Budget Index)

- b:1; - t: 3+1


77


mechanism that target women and girls vulnerable to poverty and humanitarian crises

UNHCR- Public and Private sector

humanitarian actors have enhanced capacity to deliver quality social welfare services to persons of concern in emergency situations.

- Federal and State governments have enhanced capacity to advocate for the domestication of ratified international protection instruments (AU IDP Kampala Convention and 2 Statelessness Conventions) and the passage of the National IDP Policy

Output 2.4.3: Decision-making capacities are strengthened at all levels through evidence based advocacy and learning, including South-south cooperation; to endorse, mobilize and commit resources to equitable and gender responsive social protection mechanisms.


NPC and SPC: coordination , funding and facilitation

MoLP, MoH, MoE, MoF at federal and State levels: implementation.

- i: Number of States engaged in South-South cooperation

- b: 0 - t: 10

UNICEF/UNFPA/WHO- National South-South

cooperation system strengthened to facilitate exchange of evidence and experiences across States designing and delivering social protection mechanisms and interventions

Output 2.4.4: Formal and non-formal social engagement systems and networks in identified groups and communities

- (KAP) Surveys 2014- UNDAF/P annual

reports - Content analysis of

media

FMoI, NOA: implementation

NYSC: implementation ,

NPHCDA: implementation ,

UNICEF - Community processes,

systems and frameworks for behavioural and social change strengthened for

- i: Number of social coalitions involved in social and behavior change engagements.

- b; TBD - t: NOA, NYSC, NPHCDA


78


are able to participate in equitable and sustainable social development through development and utilization of evidence-based social communication tools, channels and mechanisms

CSOs: implementation

Universities: research and knowledge management ,

CIDA, EU, USAID: technical support, funding

Community Institutions: implementation

NAPTIP: policy guidance and implementation

NACTAL:

NIS: Coordination of immigration activitiesMedia: implementation

the realization of the rights of children young people and women

- MDAs, CSOs and institutions at sub-national levels have Communication for Development capacity to catalyze appropriate behaviors linked to maternal and child health, development, protection and participation

- i: Number of Government and other institutions with budgeted C4D plans and personnel and operational linkages to communities.

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of qualitative and quantitative tracking tools to determine flow and level of information on social development between social groups, MDAs and core stakeholders in targeted communities

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of social coalitions involved in social and behaviour change engagements at community level

- b: TBD; - t: NOA, NYSC, NPHCDA, CSOs

- I: Number of Government and other institutions with budgeted C4D plans and personnel and operational linkages to communities

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of communities reporting linkages to Government and other institutions on implementation of C4D plans, processes and platforms for delivering essential family practices

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of media with good quality reporting on equitable human development .

- b; TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of private companies from targeted sectors which have integrated the UN Global Compact into their corporate policy and practice

- b: 0; - t: 10


79


Result Area 3: Equitable and Sustainable Economic GrowthStrategic Result/National Development Priority: By 2020, Nigeria attains a strong, diversified, sustainable and equitable economy driven by robust investment in human capital and infrastructure that stimulate primary production for efficient and value-adding secondary production for an unrestricted, expanded, and globally competitive trade; supported by an employment environment that is youth-inclusive, gender-sensitive with enhanced capacity. Support to MDGs: All MDGs

Outcome 3.1: By 2017, Nigeria has a favourable, equitable and gender-sensitive investment climate that enhances the ease of doing business as a basis for increased and sustainable domestic investments and capital inflows; anchored on conducive, enabling and evidence based policies; and strengthened institutions that operate based on international best practices, norms and standards.

- World Bank Ease of Doing Business Ranking.

Policy Coordination, facilitation implementation and guidanceCoordination of capacity strengthening programmes.

Resources provision and effective partnership.

Advocacy, dissemination, Awareness creation, sensitization and implementation.

Promotion of investment climate.

Political commitment, Coordination and leadership.

Technical and financial support. Research & policy implementation.

- UNDP- UN Women- ILO- UNIDO- UN HABITAT- UNOPS- UNITAR- IFAD- FAO- UNESCO- UNHCR

- i: Ease of doing business Index (EDBI)- b: EDBI 133/183 (WB, 2011)- t: 87


Output 3.1.1: A national, sectorally-linked and inclusive investment policy developed with implementation plan and coordination mechanism across Federal and State levels put in place; administered by

- National Investment Policy Document.

- UNDAF/P Annual Reports, Publications

- FMoLP reports- National Report on

employment creation- Country Programme

Monitoring report

SMEDAN: Facilitation and coordination of the policy development.

Participating State: Implementation, resources provision and effective partnership.

FMoL/MDA: Policy direction,

UNDP:- By 2016 a Micro, Small

and Medium Enterprises (MSME) Investment Policy/Walk in Kit is developed at the Federal level and each target State to enhance ease of doing business for

- i: Availability of National/State's MSME Investment Policy/Walk in Kit for enhanced ease of doing business.

- b: MSMEs investment policy does not exist at the Federal and States levels

- t: At least 6 States have accessible/functional MSMEs investment policy/Walk in Kit to guide prospective MSMEs.


80


strengthened Federal and State Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs); for enhanced ease of doing business, increased domestic investment and capital inflow and increased employment generation.

coordination and implementationSocial Partners: Coordination and implementation of interventions.

MITI at Federal &State/ NIPC: Coordination. Collaboration and facilitation of the policy process, development and management of platform

FME: Coordination and policy direction

MSMEs.

UNWOMEN- Capacity of focused

States and agencies) strengthened for the development of plans/strategies for employment generation.

- Provide Technical support for the development of business investment strategies for rural-based women in Nigeria, in collaboration with relevant MDAs

ILO- MDAs and social partners

capacity to contribute to the development of an enabling sectoral and inclusive policy environment for increased domestic investment, capital inflow and increased employment generation supported

UNIDO:- Technical capacity at

Federal and States to develop, implement and coordinate national and State-level investment policies strengthened

- Platform for monitoring foreign investment inflow to Nigeria developed

- Investment in

- I: Number of Strategic Plans for business efficiency and employment generation.

- b:0; - t: At least 6 States in Nigeria.

- I: Number of rural-based business and investment initiatives in focused States.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Number of MDAs and social partners with capacity in using the Enabling Environment for Sustainable Enterprises (EESE) package.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage of increase in number of decent jobs generated.

- b:TBD ; ;- t: TBD

- i: Number of federal & State level institutions with capacities to coordinate sectoral investments.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Investment inflow platform in place.- b: Zero common investment platform- t: Investment platform available-- i: Policy guidelines and implementation plans for

investment promotion available.- b:0 - t: National Investment Policy available at the Federal

level.


81


Output 3.1.2: Institutional and human capacities of investment related Federal and State ministries, Departments and Agencies, CSOs and relevant private sector stakeholders strengthened, through technological and knowledge acquisition to deliver high standard and equitable service, monitor and regulate compliance and provide investment support services.

- Reports of Agency Activities

- Signed MOUs

- National Digest of Statistics, NBS

FMTI : Additional Financial support and implementation.

MWASD/MST: Coordination and policy direction.Dreams Works System, Business and Professional Women in Nigeria: Partnerships, funding and implementation

FMITI & NIPC: Coordination of the capacity building process.

environmentally sound management of electrical and electronic waste up-scaled and promoted

- i: Number of States with functional MSME investment support service system.

- b: 2 States currently have well-coordinated MSME investment support service system

- t: 8 States are able to operate a functioning MSME investment support service system

.- I: Number of CSOs, government ministries/agencies

and private organizations maximizing the capacity in ICT for women as a strategic means of empowerment.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Number of federal & State level institutions with capacities to promote investments.

- b:TBD - t: at least 25% increase capacity for foreign capital

inflows promotion.

UNDP:- By 2016 SMEDAN and

Federal Ministry of Trade and Investment (FMTI) and State SME offices/Ministry of Commerce supported to provide MSME investment support services and also monitor compliance to approved Investment policy

UNWOMEN- Capacity of CSOs,

government ministries/agencies and private sector on business and ICT for economic empowerment strengthened

UNIDO:- Capacity Federal and

State and Private Sector to promote local and foreign investment strengthened.

Outcome 3.2: By 2017, Nigeria's economic growth is driven by increased and diversified use of renewable energy sources that promote technology transfer and local capacity building; characterized by affordable and equitable

- UNDP- UN Women- ILO- UNIDO- UN HABITAT- UNOPS- UNITAR- IFAD- FAO

- i: Total energy supply - b: 4,000MW t: 8,000MW - Percentage of renewable energy in total energy supply

mix.- b: 36% (2009) t: 50%

- NPC Reports - ECN Reports

As Listed below;


82


access for domestic and productive uses; supported by effective advocacy, efficient regulatory mechanisms and evidence based policies.

- FMLHUD Reports, Revised National Building Code


FMLHUD: Coordination, policy direction and funding of Nigerian Building Code Review.

FMP& ECN: Policy coordination and implementation in energy sector.

UNDP:- National policy framework

for scaling up on-grid renewable power generation Developed and implemented.

UNHABITAT- Framework for improved

Energy Efficiency in building construction and materials strengthened.

UNIDO:- Policies and strategies for

promoting access to sustainable energy for productive and household uses developed.

- Practices for improved energy efficiency in industrial processing promoted

- Wasting SHP Assets in the country assessed and reactivated

- Capacity for the implementation of the Sustainable Energy for All (SE4All) Initiative in Nigeria developed.

- Donor Coordination Group of Power in Nigeria

- i: Nigerian Building Code with integrated Energy Efficiency and Conservation measures.

- b:0 - t: 1 Code

- i: National Renewable Energy Policy with implementation strategies in place.

- b: Zero National Renewable Energy Policy.- t: National Renewable Energy Policy with

implementation strategies available at the National level.

- I: Number of energy efficiency practices promoted.- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Implementation of the SE4ALL Initiative in Nigeria- b: SE4ALL Initiative launched - t: TBD

- i: Donor Coordination in Power sector supported.- b: Group in place - t: Improved coordination.

Output 3.2.1: Energy supply diversification strategies and practices to promote the use of renewable energy sources strengthened and integrated into the national energy policy through support to the energy-related MDAs to ensure equitable and affordable access for productive and domestic uses.

- UNESCO- UNHCR


83


activities effectively managed.

Output 3.2.2: South-South Cooperation strengthened to expand the adoption and use of green technologies for the promotion and use of renewable energy sources such as hydropower, biomass, solar and wind; local equipment manufacturing reducing cost of energy to end users

- Revised NEP and REMP documents

- FMP reports- UNDAF/P Annual

Reports

Bank of Industry: promotion of investment climate for renewable energy projects

FMP, NERC and ECN :Coordination facilitation and promotion of renewable energy development

PMU/NAPTIN: Coordination and implementation

Donor Partners: Funding and resources

UNDP:- The review of the national

energy policy and review of the renewable energy master plan supported

UNIDO:- Public-private

partnerships for renewable energy technology and knowledge transfer established

- Renewable energy supply potentials from various sources assessed and investment in power generation and distribution promoted

- Knowledge transfer for local fabrication of SHP turbines advanced

- Women-led South-south knowledge transfer for solar lamp fabrication supported

UNOPS - Support Study Tours and

exchange programmes to promote human resource development in the power sector

- i: Number of stakeholders' engagements and support provided for reviewed policy.

- b: NEP and REMP outdated- t: Updated NEP and REMP policy documents.

- I: Number of PPP arrangements for technology transfer established.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of renewable Energy Technologies (RET) promoted.

- b:0 - t: 4

- i: Number of South-South Cooperation Projects established.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of South-South Cooperation agreements on renewable energy formalized.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of renewable energy equipment manufactured locally.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

Output 3.2.3: Capacity of the national energy institutions and the private sector operators

- Energy Sector Report


CSOs& Private organizations: Partnerships, resource mobilization and funding, implementation

- i: Number of organizations & CSO with strengthened capacity to effectively support/engaged in women related renewable energy businesses and initiatives.

- b:TBD

UNWOMEN- Capacity of CSOs and

private organizations strengthened to mobilize


84


and support women in renewable energy initiatives for economic empowerment.

UNIDO:- Capacity of FMP, ECN

and other relevant MDAs to manage energy policy cycle strengthened

- Capacity of the private sector for increased participation and effectiveness in the energy sector strengthened

- Appropriate strategies for identifying sites contaminated by chemicals in Annexes A, B and/or C of the Stockholm Convention developed

- Capacity of national institutions for Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) Waste Management and Disposal strengthened

UNOPS - Capacity and

infrastructure support to NAPTIN strengthened for enhanced energy sector management capacity building.

UNITAR- Power Sector MDA

capacity enhanced to support the unbundling policy of the power sector implemented.

strengthened to develop, coordinate and monitor energy policy implementation, develop framework to enhance equitable access and manufacturing of low cost renewable energy equipment, and develop requisite skills and know-how to promote energy efficiency in domestic and industrial use.

- t: Organizations in 6 States

- i: Number of public and private institutions effective in renewable energy development with enhanced capacity.

- b:TBD - t: 4 institutions

FMP & ECN: policy direction , coordination and implementation MAN : implementation of private sector investment in renewable energy

NAPTIN/PMU: Implementation

World Bank: funding


85


Outcome 3.3: Nigeria's productive system is value-chain driven, productivity enhancing, sectorally-linked and inclusive, based on green and relevant technology, supported by robust private sector-friendly investment policies that provide gender-friendly opportunities and promote rural economic development by 2017.

- NBS Report- NPC Report

As Listed below;- i: % Value Added for key sectors.- b: Agriculture: 40.2%; Manufacturing: 4.2%; Services:

35.4% (2011)- t: Agric: 32%; Manufacturing: 10%; Services: 40%.

- I: Percentage contribution to employment by key sectors.

- b: Agriculture: 30.57%; Manufacturing: 11%; Services: 6.76%

- t: Agric: 25%; Manufacturing: 20%; Services: 12%.


Output 3.3.1: National Policies and strategies for strengthening productivity and enterprise development that is gender-responsive and youth-inclusive endorsed and monitored; with implementation framework put in place and operationalized at the federal and State levels for increased job opportunities, income, wealth creation and poverty reduction.

UNWOMEN- Federal and State

MDAs and private organizations have improved enterprise policies with effective and result-oriented strategies to increase job opportunities among women and youths in Nigeria

ILO- Capacity of FMoLP and

social partners for effective implementation of National Policy on Productivity strengthened

UNESCO- National Institutional

Capacity and Human Resources for the application of Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policies for sustainable Development Strengthened.

- i: Number of MDAs and private organizations supported to develop strategies.

- b:TBD - t: Selected States in 3 geo-political zones.

- I: Number of FMoLP and social partners with improved capacity in the implementation of National Policy on Productivity.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of productivity awards given to institutions.- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number national institutions with strengthened capacities for the application of STII:

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Blueprint for Nigeria's industrial development with clear guidelines on sub-sectoral industrial development and implementation strategies in place.

- b: Zero industrial blueprint- t: NIRP, NIP and NAADI available at the Federal level

and domesticated in at least 3 States

- i: Number of policies/strategies for enhancing productivity and enterprise development endorsed.

- Policy & Strategy Documents;

- Policy implementation report

- NACAETEM Annual Report


- FMITI and NPC reports

- Project Implementation Reports,

- Policy Briefs at MDAs,- Updated policies

NPC &Sector MDAs: Coordination and implementation of enterprise development initiatives.

Private organizations: Partnerships and implementation.

FMoLP: Policy Coordination and Facilitation of capacity building process.

NECA, NLC & TUC: Coordination and implementation..

FMST: Policy Coordination and Facilitation

FMITI : coordination of policy development process and implementation

State Governments: coordination of domesticating NIRP and NIP at the State level

NACETEM: Implementation

FMARD & SMAgric; FMWR: Coordination, policy formulation


86


and direction, facilitation and implementation for strengthening productivity and enterprise development , government counterpart funding

UNIDO- Technical capacity for the

formulation implementation of the Nigerian Industrial Revolution Plan (NIRP) and New Industrial Policy (NIP) with State-level and sector-specific policies and strategies for sustainable industrial development developed.

- Capacity to develop and implement the Nigerian Agribusiness and Agro-industrial Development Initiative (NAADI) strengthened

- Cost-effective and environmental friendly urban waste disposal strategies through increased recycling developed

- Agri-Enterprise Development Programme for selected African countries (including Nigeria) with strategies for enhancing women and youth participation in agribusiness developed

IFAD- Provision of empirical

evidence of improvement of rural livelihoods,

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Availability of implementation framework for improving productivity and enterprise development.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: MDAs using the new policy analytical tools.- b: Existing analytical tools in 6 federal focal MDAs and

corresponding State MDAs are manual and not computer based

- t: Analytical software installed and used in at least 4 MDAs.

- I: Type and number of technical advisory services provided.

- b:TBD- t: TBD


87


income generation, job creation for smallholder farmers in the implementation of the Agricultural Transformation Agenda (specific focus on women and youth) to feedback into policy processes enhanced.

FAO- Skills development

capacity on the use of improved tools and methodologies for policy analysis at Federal and State levels developed

- Technical advisory services for policy development, monitoring and evaluation provided.

Output 3.3.2: Entrepreneurial skills of small and medium scale producers to grow into commercial enterprises strengthened through innovative and adaptive models of technology acquisition, transfer and diffusion of green technologies that increase productivity, reduce cost of production, provides more job opportunities especially to youth and women.

- M&E Documents;- Project Reports;- FMoLP reports- Social partners report- Evaluation report- FMITI reports - Country Programme

Evaluation report

FMY & SMEDAN: l facilitation, partnerships, policy direction for Boot Camps implementation.

FMITI:, Policy direction, facilitation and coordination of poverty reduction initiatives for job creation, and redeveloping IDCs into industrial clusters.

ITF,BoI, and Dangote Group: Funding initiative, partnerships and implementation.

NECA: Coordination and Facilitation of capacity building process for entrepreneurial and skills development.

UNDP:- Entrepreneurship Boot

Camp for SMEs adopted as an innovative model to promote Entrepreneurship among young people.

UNWOMEN- Innovative business

initiatives for increased income generation and poverty reduction among women and youths improved

ILO- FMoLP, MDAs and

relevant social partners supported to provide

- i: Number of SME boot camps adopted for promotion of entrepreneurship.

- b: Zero Entrepreneurship Boot camp has been conducted

- t: 5 Boot camps models

- i: Percentage of SME business created and or expanded from of boot camp models.

- b:TBD - t: At least 50% of boot camp participants open new

businesses

- i: Number of women and youth income generation SMEs created and strengthened.

- b:TBD - t: 1,000,000 aspiring and existing entrepreneurs

empowered.

- I: Number of FMoLP, MDAs and social partners with


88


entrepreneurial and skills acquisition to youth and start- up business and enterprise growth at federal level

UNIDO:- Implementation framework

for the redevelopment of Industrial Development Centres (IDCs) into Industrial Clusters developed

- Capacity building programme for SME skills acquisition training in supply chain management developed

- Agribusiness investment and technology promotion for SMEs promoted

- Agribusiness and Enterprise Development Support services established

- Framework for the support of women and youth agribusiness entrepreneurship established

- Industrial and Agribusiness competitiveness in targeted sectors enhanced

- Value-addition in targeted food and non-food value

capacity in using relevant ILO Business packages and Start and improve your business modules.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Percentage increase in the number of industrial clusters.

- b:TBD - t: At least 20% increase in the number of industrial

clusters in Nigeria.

- i: Percentage increase in the number of employees in the SME sector.

- b:TBD - t: 30% increase in the number of employees within the

SME sector

- i: Percentage and spread of youth employment in Agriculture strategy implemented.

- b:TBD - t: 100 % implementation of Youth Agricultural

Programme.

- i: Number of youth and women business linked to MSEs in rural areas of target States.

- b:TBD ; - t: TBD:


89


chains enhanced

- Increase patronage of the National Quality Infrastructure by the private sector promoted

- Entrepreneurial and technical skills of agro-SMEs enhanced

FAO:- Capacity of Government

to implement the Youth Employment in Agriculture programme enhanced through technical assistance in strategy and programme formulation

IFAD: - Youth and women

entrepreneurs capacity enhanced, mentored, and financially linked to develop micro small enterprises in rural areas in target States

Output 3.3.3: Strategies for enhanced valued added production developed, implementation plan, coordination mechanism and framework for integrating inputs suppliers, producers, processors and marketers established; leading to economic diversification, increased job opportunities, enhanced income and poverty reduction

- Strategy & policy documents


- Country Programme monitoring reports

- NIRP implementation reports

- MoFRD Reports

FMA&RD: Mobilization of additional resources and implementation of the value chain strategies development and coordination of SCPZ master plan.

BoI & Dangote Group: Funding, partnerships and implementation.

FMITI:, Coordination, facilitation and funding and implementation of the pillars in the NIRP

NECA MDAs: Coordination and Facilitation of capacity building

- i: Number of commodities/ products with developed value chain strategies.

- b: 1 State has developed a commodity value chain strategy/Inclusive market policy

- t: At least five States have well developed commodity value chain strategy and inclusive market policy.

- i: Number of States with operational Inclusive Market Policy.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Number of institutions supported to complete Vocational, Business and Entrepreneurship Acquisition packages for improved production.

UNDP:- Integrated value chain

strategies for selected Agricultural commodities/ SME products are fully developed.

- Inclusive Market policy and implementation plan are developed at the Federal and State level to support Agricultural Transformation and SME promotion.


90


especially for women and youth.

process for entrepreneurial and skills development packages.

UNWOMEN- Capacity of Federal and

target States institutions improved to support value added production in women and youth businesses for enhanced job creation.

ILO- Target federal institutions

and Social partners' capacity to develop production strategies and engendering interest in entrepreneurship and skill acquisition improved to increase job opportunities.

UNIDO:- Master plan for the

establishment of multiple staple crops processing zones developed

- Technical capacity for establishing non-food common facility centres (CFC) developed

- National capacities for establishing agro-food processing centres developed

- industrial use of high value targeted/ value chains promoted

- Women access to postharvest/processing technologies enhanced

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Master plan for SCPZ available.- b: Zero master plan- t: 1 SCPZ master plan available at the Federal level.

- i: Percentage increase in employment in the agro-food processing centers and non-food CFCs.

- b:TBD - t: At least 3 food and non-food CFCs established

- i: Number of commodity investment plans available.- b:TBD - t: 5 target States have commodity plans.

- i: Number of agro-input producer groups linked to national and regional markets.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Percentage improvement in post- harvest loss in priority commodities value chain.

- b:TBD - t: 50% decrease in post-harvest loss.


91


IFAD: - Commodity development

and investment plans formulated based on agricultural analysis at the State levels with identified opportunities for linking agro-inputs, producer groups, processors to national and regional market opportunities.

FAO:- Capacity of Federal and

target States key MDAs, private sector, women and youth groups strengthened for better post-harvest handling and improved market access in priority commodities value chain.

Output 3.3.4: Human and institutional capacities of relevant government agencies, and private sector institutions, of the productive subsectors of the economy built to enhance productivity at primary and secondary levels through strengthened Vocational, Business and Entrepreneurship acquisition and training centers, extension agencies to provide equitable and gender responsive opportunities for economic growth.

- Project reports, M&E reports


- MAN reports- FME reports- SMEDAN reports- State Reports

UNDP:- Delta State Youth

Empowerment Programme (YEP)- deepened to serve as a model of youth vocational, entrepreneurial and agro-allied skills training center and adopted by Federal/State Ministries of Youth Development.

UNIDO:- Youth and women

Entrepreneurship Centres with requisite ICT infrastructure established

- Technical capacity of

- i: Number of States that participate in the existing YEP or replicate the model.

- b: Only Delta State currently run and participate in YEP

- t: At least 3 States and the Federal, participate or replicate the YEP model.

- i: Number of entrepreneurship centers established.- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i:: Percentage increase in youth and women entrepreneurs.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Targets MDAs and SMEDA have capacity for improved SPX .

- b:TBD

Delta State:Coordination, facilitation funding and implementation Delta State

FMYD: Coordination, facilitation funding and implementation

FMITI &FME : Coordination , policy direction, facilitation and implementation of establishment of NCPC entrepreneurship centres, international environmental protocols, conventions SMEDAN: implementation and among linkage SMEs etc


92


SMEDAN and other relevant MDAs for the establishment of Sub-Contracting and Partnership Exchange (SPX) strengthened

- Framework for SME rating and entrepreneurial information management system developed

- Human and institutional capacities for the implementation of international environmental protocols, conventions and agreements strengthened.

- Capacity of MDAs improved to develop Agribusiness investment/knowledge sharing platform.

UNOPS- Capacity of Niger Delta

and Bayelsa States MDAs enhanced through TVET - YEP for youth employment creation of world class functional vocational training and production schools/centres with linkages to relevant national and international institutions in at least two States of the Niger Delta and Northern States supported.

FAO:- Capacity of Institutions

that provide technical

- t: At least 15% increase in subcontracting activities between SMEs and larger corporations.

- i: SME rating framework in place.- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Number of international conventions, protocols, etc domesticated and effectively implemented.

- b:TBD - t: At least 10% increase in domesticated international

conventions. -- i: Agribusiness investment platform available.- b:TBD - t: At least one agribusiness investment platform at

federal level.

- i: Percemtage increase in youth employment through TVET-YEP

- b:TBD - t: 1 target State

- i: Number of institutions that complete Vocational, Business and Entrepreneurship Acquisition packages in two States.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Number of model Vocational centers in the target States.

- b:TBD- t: TBD


93


support services (extension, irrigation, seeds) to relevant actors in the agriculture priority value chains strengthened

Outcome 3.4: By 2017, Nigeria's domestic and foreign trade is expanded, diversified, globally competitive and based on international best practices, norms and conventions; deriving from conducive and evidence-based policies and strong capacity, resulting in improved terms of trade with significant increase in foreign exchange earnings and GDP.


- CBN, - UNCTAD STAT, - WEF

As Listed below;- i: Trade GDP Ratio.- b: 7.9% (CBN, 2009) - t: 1. 10%

- i: Diversification index. - b: 0.779 (UNCTAD STAT, 2011) - t: 0.550

- i: Global competitive index- b: 127/139 (WEF, 201 - t: 95

Output 3.4.1: National Trade policy endorsed, with implementation plan developed and adopted and coordination mechanism put in place to deepen and diversify domestic and foreign trade, and facilitate Nigeria's trade relations with other countries; stimulate production and enhance inter-sectoral linkages and trade opportunities.

UNWOMEN- National Strategic Plan

for Women in Cross Border Trade (WICBT) developed to strengthen Women's participation in trade and cross-border activities in Nigeria and other ECOWAS States

UNIDO:- Revised trade policy

encompassing Quality requirements endorsed

- Strategies for the implementation of National Quality Infrastructure (NQI) programme developed

- Policy, strategy and

- i: WICBT available- b: Zero plan - t: One National Strategic Plan of WICBT developed

and implemented

- i: Revised Trade Policy.- b: No trade policy encompassing quality issues.- t: At least 1 revised trade policy.

- i: Existence of a broad based, accessible Agricultural Marketing Information System (AMIS) for market access.

- b: Existing MIS limited in scope, geographical coverage and access to users

- t: 1 node of MIS in FMARD on pilot bases

- National Strategic Plan of WICBT;

- NBS report- FMITI report- Country Programme

monitoring reports- AMIS in FMARD

FMITI: l coordinate the trade policy revision process

FMITI and SON: Manage implementation of the quality infrastructure framework..

FMARD :Policy direction and guidance, Coordination, funding and implementation of the functional AMIS.


94


framework for food quality and safety developed in conformity with international standards and norms for traded products

FAO- FMARD technically

supported to establish functional Agricultural Marketing Information System (AMIS) for market access to improve regional trade relations in priority commodities value chains.

Output 3.4.2: Relevant Trade and Investment MDAs are able to develop and monitor the implementation of trade policy that boost domestic trade and promote international trade; MDAs and other trade related institutions are able to promote and negotiate trade with partners through strengthened capacity in line with international best practices; trade capacity building and quality infrastructure; to expand, diversify and enhance global competitiveness.

- Trade Reports Publisher by NBS and FIMTI

- Regulatory frameworks /Reports


- SON report- Country Programme

monitoring report

FMITI & FMF: Facilitation and coordination of capacity strengthening programmes.

NEPC, NCI, NP: facilitation and implementation of the Strategic Plan.

FMITI: coordination, facilitation and policy direction for capacity building process.

SON: implementation of development of national quality infrastructure.

- i: Number of new trade opportunities availability and MDAs with enhanced capacity to promote trade.

- b: In 2013, trade opportunities remain low and undiversified

- t: 50% increase in new trade opportunities and diversification

- i: WICBT gap analysis report available.- b: Situational Analysis Report of WICBT in Nigeria.- t: WICBT in Nigeria and key government agencies

- i: Increase in the number of trade quality infrastructure.- b: 1 quality infrastructure- t: At least 3 quality infrastructure in place.

UNDP- National capacity of trade

and investment MDAs on Trade Facilitation and Promotion enhanced and improved for increased volume of Trade.

UNWOMEN- Existing gaps in policies,

regulatory frameworks, and programmes related to Women in Cross Border Trade (WICBT) identified

UNIDO:- Capacities of FMITI and

other relevant MDAs to monitor the implementation of trade policy strengthened

- Human and institutional capacities of quality infrastructure institutions and laboratories to


95


implement national quality programmes strengthened

- National capacity to establish and manage National Metrology Institute developed

- Technical capacity to establish and manage national accreditation and certification body developed

- Capacity of regulatory agencies/associations in quality/standards strengthened.

Outcome 3.5: By 2017, Nigeria's employment opportunities are expanded, driven by pro-poor, gender -responsive and youth-inclusive policies supported by skills-driven, competent capacities based on reliable, available and disaggregated data.

NBS reports As Listed below:- UNDP- UN Women- ILO- UNIDO- UN HABITAT- UNOPS- UNITAR- IFAD- FAO- UNESCO- UNHCR

- i: National unemployment rate.- b: 23.9% (2011) - t: 17%

- i: National gender disaggregated unemployment rate.- b: F 24.3% ( 2011) - t: F 19.4%

- i: Youth unemployment rate.- b: 37.7% ( 2011) - t: 27.7%

- Reviewed and adopted Employment policy

- Workplan- Cultural industries

Publications - FML&P report- NBS report- Country Programme

monitoring report

FMoLP and Social Partners: Coordination, Facilitation policy direction for review of National Employment Policy.

FMTC&NO: Political Commitment and facilitation.NGOs/CSOs: community mobilization and implementation.NOGALSS: Implementation and mobilization of NGOs/CBOs.

ILO- National Employment

policy reviewed and adopted, and work plan developed in line with Decent Work Country Programme II to enhance job creation for women and men

- Capacities of the MDAs and other relevant stakeholders to formulate pro-employment policies

- i: Reviewed Employment Policy available.- b: Current National Employment policy- t: Reviewed policy and its workplan

- i: National Employment Work plan in place.- b: 0 - t: Workplan

- i: Number of MDAs with capacity for innovative pro-employment policies.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

Output 3.5.1: A national employment policy that promotes labour–based technologies with high employment multiplier and decent jobs put in place; leading to the broadening of the productive base and expansion of employment opportunities; accompanied by implementation plan and coordination mechanism


96


developed and endorsed at federal level and systematically adopted at State and LGAs levels.

built.

UNESCO:- Cultural industries, craft

development promoted through advocacy at federal level.

UNIDO:- Web platform on labour

market information for unemployed youth established to improve access of unemployed youth to the job market

- Capacity of unemployed youth and Self -led entrepreneurs on job search and Self-employment techniques built.

- i: Number of advocacy materials on cultural industries.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage increase in number of youth finding employment on the web platform.

- b:TBD- t: At least 20% increase in number of youths finding

jobs on the web platform.

FMITI : Coordination and facilitation for web platform development and capacity building process.

Output 3.5.2: Human and institutional capacities of relevant Federal and State MDAs, workers and private sector organizations strengthened to develop, coordinate and monitor the implementation of pro-poor, gender-responsive, youth-inclusive and evidence-based employment policy; support the development of entrepreneurial vocational and ICT skills.

- UNDAF/P Annual Report

- DWCP II report- Policy

implementation/evaluation report

- Federal Ministry of Education

- (FME) reports- Secondary School

curriculum- Country Programme

monitoring report

FMC, FMWSD: Policy direction, coordination and facilitation of initiative.

DreamWorks System Solution Limited & Private partners: partnerships, funding and implementation of initiative

FMoLP : Coordination and Facilitation Policy direction. d Social Partners : implementation.

FME: Coordination, policy direction and facilitation of development of secondary school curriculum incorporating entrepreneurship.

FMITI: Coordination and implementation of the LIFE

UNWOMEN- Capacity of public and

private organizations strengthened to support women to socio-economic empowerment through an ICT initiatives

ILO- Capacities of FMLP,

social partners and other stakeholders enhanced to ensure effective implementation of employment policy, action plan and strategies.

UNIDO:- Youth entrepreneurship

and IT capacity (Learning Initiative for

- i: Number of organizations in private and public sector with capacity to support women in ICT and innovative online entrepreneurship.

- b:TBD - t: Business women in the 6 geo political zones.

- i: Number of institutions and social partners with capacity on Policy implementation.

- b:TBD- t: 25% increase in institutions and partners for

implementation of the policy.

- i: Entrepreneurship mainstreamed into school curriculum.

- b: Zero entrepreneurship in Secondary curriculum.; - t: Entrepreneurship mainstreamed into secondary

school curriculum.

- i: MAP developed and % reduction in unemployment rate in target States.


97


programme.

Directorates of Employment at Federal and State Levels; Ministry of Youth Development; Ministry of Labour; Ministry of Education; SMEDAN NNPC PTDF: Facilitation, promotion and implementation.

Entrepreneurs-LIFE) strengthened

- Entrepreneurship curriculum for secondary schools in Nigeria developed

IFAD: - Federal, State and local

government levels M&E systems capacities developed, with better data collection, collation, analysis, including ATA indicators for enterprise development.

UNITAR- Specialized Vocational

and Technical Training for Employment Generation in fields of Drilling, Instrumentation, Welding –basib, MMA111, MIGMAG 136, TIG 141; Safety and Quality Maintenance Officers; Automation; Cable Tray; Millwright and ICT for inclusive youths introduced and promoted at Federal and target State levels.

- Initiatives for job creation, employment generation, business growth and poverty reduction through MAP (Micro-Enterprise Acelleration Programme developed

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Percentage increase in SME business ventures.- b:TBD - t: TBD


98


FAO- Relevant Government

agencies and key stakeholders technical capacity strengthened to develop and implement consolidated M&E system for the priority value chains under ATA.

UNHCR- Advocacy capacity of

Federal MDAs enhanced for the development of national policies to facilitate social integration of refugees including employment opportunities.


99


Result Area 4: Human Security and Risk ManagementStrategic Result/National Development Priority: By 2020 Nigeria is on a peaceful, secure and sustainable development path where disaster, environmental, climate and conflict risks and threats are mitigated by policies, laws and plans that are participatory, gender responsive, funded, monitored and enforced systematically at all levels of the federation with high levels of political will; relevant government institutions respond timely, effectively, efficiently and are well coordinated (vertically and horizontally) in effective partnership with empowered civil society and utilize evidence-based early warning systems; and where the population is rights-assertive and increasingly resilient through awareness and ability to participate in mitigation and response. Supports all MDGs ( Goal 1 to 8)

Outcome 4.1: By 2017, the effects of disasters and emergencies on the population in emergency prone areas are reduced through an effectively regulated framework for prevention, preparedness and timely response; by coordinated and capacitated institutions at federal, State and local levels in partnership with civil society, informed by equity and gender considerations and an evidence based EWEA system; and resilient communities.

- NEMA and SEMAs reports.

Coordination, facilitation implementation and guidance.

Advocacy, dissemination, Awareness creation, sensitization and implementation.

Coordination and leadership.

Technical and financial support. Research & policy implementation.

-UNDP-UN Women-WHO-UNICEF-IOM-WMO-FAO-UN HABITAT-UNOPS-UNITAR-UNFPA-UNODC-UNHCR-UNESCO-ILO

- I: Percentage of affected population benefiting from adequate and timely emergency.

- b: < 30% - t: 80%


- National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) report, national gazettes, EPR policy document

- State Emergency Management Agency (SEMAs)/NEMA report

- SEMAs/NEMA report

FMWASD; implementation and dissemination of the National Action Plan on UNSCR 1325.

FMOH & NPHCDA: coordination, facilitation and implementation guidance.

UNDP- National coordination

mechanism for disaster recovery strategy and framework established by 2015 for emergency preparedness and Response (EPR) Disaster Risk Management (DRM)

- i: Existence of National Emergency Preparedness and Response policy.

- b: Outdated National Emergency Preparedness Response (EPR) policies.

- t: National EPR policy developed and adopted by 2015.

- i: Number of States with EPR policies.- b: DRM not integrated in national planning processes.

Output 4.1.1: The national legal and policy framework for emergency coordination, risk reduction and response is strengthened in conformity with international standards and systematically cascaded at State level.


100


NEMA: Coordination and leadership, ensure efficient sectorial and stakeholders participation in EPR and RAs.

SEMAs: Ensure involvement of sectorial stakeholders at State level.

NCFR: development and implementation of contingency plan for IDP management.

strategy frameworks integrated into the 2014-2017 national implementation plan II (NIP– 2)

- National disaster management legislation reviewed to ensure conformity international best practices by 2014

UNWOMEN- Capacity of NEMA and

other MDAs to develop and implement Gender responsive Frameworks, Early Warning and Response systems, plans and mechanisms for equitable emergency coordination and response strengthened

WHO - FMOH supported in the

implementation of the national core capacity requirements for International Health Regulations (IHR 2005) including the domestication of IHR 2005 into national public health laws

- Support Country revising Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) revised and implementation scaled up at LGA level.

- t: At least 3 target States adopt the EPR.

- i: Percentage of States with regularly updated contingency plans.

- b:TBD - t: 80% of States that have adopted the EPR regularly

update contingency plans.

- i: Number of functional gender sensitive early warning and response systems established in target States.

- b:0- t: 8 States

- i: Percentage IHR core capacity requirements achieved from IHR Annual monitoring report.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Number of IHR laws domesticated.- b:TBD- t: TBD

- I; Timeliness and completeness of IDSR Reporting.- b:TBD- t:TBD.

- i: Number of MDAs with capacity to respond to health emergencies.

- b:TBD - t: Appropriate corrective actions/projects to fill the

capacity gaps initiated.

- State Activity Reports- Plans and reports- Weekly and monthly

Epidemiological Reports/bulletin

- Rapid Assessment Reports

- Evaluation reports- UNDAF/P Annual

Report.


101


- Capacity of health federal and State MDAs in , detection, investigation and response to epidemics and other public health emergencies enhanced.

UNICEF - All high risks States have

effective emergency preparedness and response, coordination, monitoring and evaluation structures as per international humanitarian standards.

- Partnership and functional emergency management networks and community driven EWEA mechanisms are established for effective DRR and enhanced community resilience.

Output 4.1.2: An improved and integrated EW/EA system covering the three tiers of the Federation that produces timely and actionable gender disaggregated, equity sensitive information, direction and advice for decision makers, agencies, CSOs and communities.

- EW/ER quarterly bulletin, NEMA reports

- Revised Contingency Plans

- Advocacy reports- Developed

Contingency Plan- Advocacy reports- Disaster Contingency

Plan - Contingency Plan for

IDP& Disaster management

- NIMET and NIHSA

NEMA: Coordination and implementation of National Disaster contingency plan and.

FMWASD & SMWASD: Advocacy and implementation

NCFR: development and implementation of contingency plan for IDP management NIMET& NIHSA: Implementation

- i: National Coordinating mechanism for flood early warning developed.

- b: No coordinating mechanism in place - t: Coordinating mechanism for flood early warning

system in place.

- i: Early Flood Warning Systems expanded at community levels.

- b: Fewer nos. of communities with early warning systems in place

- t: 60% increase in communities along the flood plains have early warnings systems developed.

- i: Existence of an integrated EW/EA system.- b: No integrated EW/EA in place

UNWOMEN- Women organizations

involvement in the development and implementation of in EW/EA systems at federal, State and LGA levels increased.

IOM- Updated NEMA National

Contingency Plan (including flood contingency plan) on disaster challenges


102


developed.

- Capacity of NCFR to respond and manage internally displacement through contingency plan at the Federal and target State, developed.

WMO- Capacity of NIMET and

NIHSA to prepare accurate Seasonal Rainfall forecast and Flood prediction strengthened.

FAO- Technically equip and

improve the skills of Federal and States M & E personnel to regularly monitor food and nutrition security (as part of the early warning system) using standard tools and methodologies.

WHO - Event –based

surveillance and risk assessment system and procedures for all identified public health events supported

- Capacity for adequate information management, risk assessment and risk communication assessment for Public Health Events of Potential International concern Strengthened.

annual Report- Data base of reported

Public health events- Health Risk

Assessment Reports

- t: Integrated EW/ER systems established at national and at least 3 States.

- i: Number of organizations with enhanced capacity to advocate for Women in EW/EA systems at Federal, State and LGA levels.

- b:TBD - t: 10 organizations in 8 target States

- i: Existence of a Disaster and IDP Contingency Plans.- b: Zero Disaster and IDP Contingency Plan - t: Contingency Plan for Disaster and IDP

management available

- i: Improved rainfall and flood predictions.- b: 80% accurate predictions - t: 100% predictions.

- i: Robust Surveillance system in place. - b: TBD - t: Existence of an Event-based Surveillance system.


103


Output 4.1.3: Strengthened institutional capacity to coordinate, prepare for and respond to emergencies and to enhance coping capacity of communities (including safety nets).

- SEMAs/NEMA Report - State Assessments

Reports - Capacity

Development Action Plan Document

- NEMA, SEMA Reports, CRPP Report, Making Cities Resilient Programme Reports

- IDPs Information Management Systems

- Data management strategy

- Reports on risks and vulnerability assessments

- NEMA annual report

- VCA reports- UNDAF/P Annual

Reports

NEMA to provided coordination and leadership.Stakeholders in humanitarian forum to ensure efficient sectorial participation in EPR and RAs.

SEMAs: implementation, ensure involvement of sectoral stakeholders at State level.

NEMA, SEMAs:: Technical, financial support to facilitate CRPP, Making Cities Resilient programme participation.

NEMA and NCFR: Set up and manage the IDPs information management systems.

NEMA and NCFR: lead design of Data Management Strategy.

NEMA: Coordination and, facilitation of sectoral partners for the assessments of vulnerability of various regions based on the seasonal forecast.

- i: Institutional capacity plan developed by NEMA and in selected States.

- b: Coordination capacity is limited as evidenced by the response to the 2012 flood disaster.

- t: Inventory of DRM programmes at both federal and State level developed.

- i: NEMA's capacity to replicate the Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) process.

- b:PDNA Report- t:TBD.

- i: Number of States/LGs with Disaster Resilience Profiles.

- b:0- t:5.

- i: Number of target MDAs with capacity to conduct risk and vulnerability assessment and emergency procurement.

- b:TBD - t:TBD.

- i: Number of targeted LGs with Disaster Risk Reduction Plans.

- b:0- t:5.

- i: Existence of an IDPs Information Management system.

- b:0- t:1.

- i: Data Management Strategy.- b:0- t:1.

- i: Number of organizations involved in CCM at the federal and State level.

- b:26 organizations - t: 40 organizations

- i: IIDP Database in place.

UNDP- Capacity of NEMA and at

least 3 selected SEMAs enhanced to co-ordinate, prepare for and respond to disasters by 2015.

UNHABITAT- Capacity of target States

andLGs to conduct City Resilience Profiling and prepare Disaster Risk Reduction plans developed.

IOM- IDPs Information

Management Systems and Data management strategy for NCFRMI and NEMA established.

- Capacity of NEMA, SEMAs, NCFR and other relevant CSOs enhanced on Camp Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM).

- Capacity of target LGAs rities on Information Management improved.

UNOPS - Capacity of target federal

and State MDAs to conduct risk and vulnerability assessment for safe schools and safe health facilities improved.

- Technical Capacity of target federal and State


104


organizations in emergency procurement and supply chain management of essential supplies and medicines supported and strengthened.

WMO- Institutional capacity of

NEMA in the risk and vulnerability assessment in various parts of the country enhanced.

UNITAR- Improved capacity to

cope with disaster risks. - Capacity for high level of

resilience in communities developed.

UNFPA- Capacity federal and

target States for effective humanitarian response in sexual and reproductive health, gender based violence and population data Improved.

FAO- Capacity upgrading of

Federal and selected State MDAS on gender-sensitive disaster risk reduction, emergency preparedness and response in the agriculture sector strengthened..

- b:0- t: 1.

- i: Number of target MDAs with capacity to conduct risk and vulnerability assessment and emergency procurement.

- b: TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of emergency procurement implemented.- b:TBD t:TBD.

- i: Delivery of Seasonal rainfall forecast across the country.

- b: Seasonal forecast only available at the beginning of each year

- t: NEMA capacity enhanced in weather information..- i: Delivery of national flood forecasts.- b:TBD- t:TBD.

- I: Availability of forecasts updates.- b:TBD- t:TBD.

- I: Proportion of planned risk assessments conducted.- B: 25%- t: :80%.


105


WHO - Federal and States

technical capacity to conduct national and sub-national capacity and risk assessments to identify priority actions for all-hazards emergencies and disaster risk management for health enhanced.

- Health institutions capacity including building resilience of communities during health emergencies strengthened.

Outcome 4.2: By 2017 the occurrence and effects of conflicts and violence are reduced through institutionalized and coordinated prevention and management by the establishment of a peace architecture supporting negotiated solutions at federal, State and community level in partnership with civil society, informed by gender sensitive conflict analysis and other evidence based EWEA methodologies, and tolerant, peace-loving and resilient communities.

-UNDP-UN Women-WHO-UNICEF-IOM-WMO-FAO-UN HABITAT-UNOPS-UNITAR-UNFPA-UNODC-UNHCR-UNESCO-ILO

- i: Percentage of conflicts where escalation is prevented with the use of EW/EA system.

- b: 10% - t:60%

- i: Percentage of conflicts mediated and resolved- b:20% - t:50%

- i: Number of civilian casualties- b:1000 - t:0

Output 4.2.1: National peace architecture established through advocacy and strengthened to

UNDP- High quality analyses and

options generated for more effective responses to conflict by 2014.

- i: Number of infrastructure for peace in existence at national and State levels.

- b: No peace and dialogue platform currently exits, and political discourse is conducted through tactical maneuvers, grandstanding in the media, and use of

- DIM Report- Donors' reports- IPCR

Reports/publications- NDA

IPCR: co-ordination, facilitation research, policy and implementation

INPC: coordination funding


106


systematically and institutionally promote tolerance, a culture of peace, dialogue and support negotiated solutions in order to prevent, mitigate and respond timely to conflict and violence disturbing life, especially of the most vulnerable.

- Credible, independent, inclusive national platform established to support dialogue at national level on issues of identity and its management.

- Sub-national platforms established for “insider mediation” in target States in northern and central Nigeria, as well as, in the Niger delta region.

- Capacities for mediation and conflict transformation strengthened in selected States and communities.

- Women initiatives effectively mainstreamed into community conflict mitigation efforts and peace building.

- Livelihood support provided for youths and women in at least 5 violent conflict communities.

UNWOMEN- Gender-sensitive peace

architecture in selected States established or reformed, to include forums of dialogue, early warning systems and rapid response mechanisms for conflict resolution

- Enhanced community peace-making capacities

reports/publications- NSCDC

reports/publications- States and CSOs

partners' reports/publications


- B reports, , - Reports of

implementation of peace architecture

- Advocacy reports, Gazettes,

- Gender sensitive peace architecture

- Inter-ministerial committee Documentation

- NDCMP 2014 -2017

mobilization and interventions, policies and implementation. NDC, NHRC, ONAS, NIPSS, NSCDC, NOA, FMWA, NEMA, NIREC, NOA, CAN, SCIA, NCWS, WANEP: Implementation and facilitation

CSOs: Implementation of peace building activities at State and LGA levels, and legislative advocacy engagements of the NDCMP. FMWASD; Policy direction, coordination, implementation and dissemination of the National Action Plan on UNSCR 1325

NDLEA: Coordination and implementation of the NDCMP

NEMA/NRCS/NCFR/ NHRC: Policy development, sector planning, review and coordination, resource allocation, institutional and system development, effective service provision models, advocacy, capacity development.

local proxies for violence.- t: State dialogue platforms established in the 9 pilot

States. Framework and parameters for Peace Architecture.

- i: Number of States and communities with mechanisms for internal mediation in place.

- b: Some analysis of conflict situations in the country exists but little or nothing on a national infrastructure for peace.

- t: 9 States and 30 communities for mediation and conflict mechanisms.

- i: Number of States with functional early warning and early response systems.

- b:TBD - t: At least 2 facilitated conversations with Report with

recommendations on parameters for peace architecture.

- i: Number of women involved in various levels of consultations.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Number of States with gender sensitive peace architecture established or reformed.

- b:TBD - t: TBD.- i; In-country conflict resolution mechanisms research

report.- b:TBD - t: TBD- i: Evidence of lessons learnt in peace building and

conflict management documented. Evidence of community based women and girls actively engaged in peace building.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Types of information collected in target States to illustrate women's experiences in peace building and conflict management processes.


107


of women Implementation of UNSC1325 National Plan of Action on Women Peace and Security at National level and in selected States enhanced.

UNODC- National Drug Control

Master Plan 2014-2017 formulated and implemented

- Legislative advocacy for reforms/passage of Anti-SOM and Anti-TIP Laws in Nigeria supported.

UNHCR- Capacity for relevant

MDAs on emergency preparedness and response strengthened.

- Advocacy support for government provision of appropriate material, psycho-social legal and protection assistance for persons of concern. and early warning undertaken/ provided..

- Technical support for IDP protection provided through the Protection Sector Working group and Camp Management Working Group.

- b:TBD- t:TBD

- i: Number of youths and women provided with livelihood support.

- b:TBD- t:TBD.

- i: Existence of a coordinated gender sensitive framework for conflict prevention, mediation and peace building.

- b: Less than 10% of women engaged in active peace building and conflict mitigation

- t:: Percentage increase in number of women engaged in mediation and conflict transformation.

- i: Number of legislative advocacy activities on TIP/SOM supported.

- b: Inadequate/Non-existent TIP legislation- t: Comprehensive and responsive TIP and SOM Act in

place by 2016

- i: Existence of a National Drug Control Master Plan.- b: NDCMP 2008 -2011.- t: NDCMP 2014 -2017 in place and operationalized by

Q1, 2015.


108


Output 4.2.2: An improved and integrated conflict EW/EA system covering the three tiers of the Federation that produces timely and actionable gender disaggregated, equity-sensitive conflict analysis, strategic directions including do no harm alternatives, and guidance for decision makers, agencies, CSOs and communities.

- DIM Report- Donors' reports- IPCR

Reports/publications- MNDA

reports/publications- NSCDC

reports/publications- States and CSOs

partners' reports/publications

- Project sites visits- Partners Activity

Reports- Partners Annual

Reports- UNDAF/P Annual

Reports

NEMA/NCFR and SEMAs:Coordination and implementation

CSOs and Private Sector: Implementation, Awareness creation and sensitization and advocacy

NAPTIP& NIS: Coordination and implementation

Drug Control LEAs: Collaboration and partnership

UNDP- Integrated early warning

and early response systems, as well as, grievance redress mechanisms established at national level and target States.

- Information and communication technology (ICT) for development promoted in target States by 2015.

- Livelihoods support provided for conflict/violence in target States and 30 communities.

UNODC- Institutional capacities in

Nigerian Drug Law Enforcement and Regulatory Agencies, including Standard Operating Procedures, case management supported

- Improved seaport and airport and border post controls through increased cooperation between relevant law enforcement agencies, including provision of training and equipment.

- Institutional capacity of

frontline Anti-SOM and Anti-TIP agencies strengthened.

- i: Number of States with functional early warning and early response systems.

- b: TBD; - t: State dialogue platforms established in the 9 pilot

States 30 communities.

- i: Number of States with ICT capacity for EW/EA.- b:TBD - t:TBD

- i: Number of institutional capacity assessments supported.

- b:TBD - t: At least 4 Institutional assessments by 2016

- i: Number of SOPs, and case management mechanisms developed.

- b:TBD- t:TBD

- i: Number of operational equipment/tools supplied.- b:TBD - t:TBD

- i: Number of joint activities supported.- b: 1 Joint operational mechanism.- t: At least 2 Joint/Interagency mechanism in place.

- i: Existence of a coordinated gender sensitive framework for conflict prevention, mediation and peace building.

- b: Less than 10% of women engaged in active peace building and conflict mitigation ;

- t:TBD


109


Outcome 4.3: By 2017 Nigeria's environmental vulnerability to negative effects of economic activities, urbanization and climate change is reduced through the efficient use of natural resources, a reformed regulatory framework aligned with Nigeria's international commitments, enforced at Federal, State and local levels by strengthened institutions, private sector and population that are environmentally conscious and taking action towards environmental sustainability.

Field SurveyMDG reports/indicatorsNational guidelines and amendments.

Listed below.- UNDP- UN Women- WHO- UNICEF- IOM- WMO- FAO- UN HABITAT- UNOPS- UNITAR- UNFPA- UNODC- UNHCR- UNESCO- ILO

- i: Number/proportion of primary laws and policies with biodiversity mainstreamed.

- b: 0 - t: 80%

- i: Functional regulatory framework for biodiversity and environmental sustainability.

- b: 15% - t: 80%

- i: Percentage of implementation of regulatory framework and coordination.

- b: <10% - t: 80%

Output 4.3.1: A comprehensive national regulatory framework is developed in line with ratified international protocols and its implementation supported for the sustainable management of Nigeria's natural resources including land, water, air, oil, biodiversity, natural habitats and extractive industries.

UNDP- The emergence of

innovative financing and technical support mechanisms demonstrates the increased commitment of oil and gas operations to biodiversity protection in the Niger Delta region.

- Climate resilient policies, strategies and plans for green economy developed at Federal level

- Relevant federal agencies/MDAs, and the private sector, demonstrate increased ability to access emerging climate financing

- i: Availability of functional technical and financial support mechanism for biodiversity concerns in the Niger Delta.

- b: Biodiversity concerns not mainstreamed into oil and gas operations.

- t: Trust fund for biodiversity conservation established.

- i: Policies, plans and strategies for the development of green economy in place.

- b: Green economy strategies and policies not in place- t: Green Economy policy, strategies and action plans

developed.

- i: Increase in size of portfolio for climate financing.- b: Limited climate financing opportunities available- t: 50% increase in climate financing portfolio

(REDD+/Adaptation Fund/GEF) available at Federal level.

- . - i: Number of targeted States and LGAs implementing

improved Environmental Planning and Management policies and strategies.

- Biodiversity mainstreaming operational manuals.

- Climate change policy documents.

- International negotiations briefs and reports.

- Federal and States MoLHUD reports, State of Nigerian Cities. reports, ALGON reports

- NIMET report.

FME& SME: Policy development, sector planning, review, coordination and resource allocation/provision.

ECN promotion of innovation, deployment and diffusion of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologiesDG: Funding and technical assistance and linkages with global best practices NPC Coordination the integration of climate change into national development plan

Participating States:


110


opportunities

UNHABITAT- Capacity of States/Local

Governments to develop and implement improved Environmental Planning and Management policies/ strategies strengthened

UNESCO- The International

Hydrographical Programme (IHP) and Man and the Biosphere (MAB) National Committees for Effective Water Governance, Biosphere Reserve Management and Biodiversity Conservation strengthened.

WMO- National Framework for

Climate Services (NFCS) in the Framework of Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS) initiated

FAO- Technical input to assist

relevant MDAs to upgrade policy and regulatory frameworks on programme implementation for land, water, forest resources and climate change provided.

- b:3 States- t: 12

- i: Number of States adopting participatory planning and improved regulatory framework.

- b:TBD- t: TBD- i: NFCS initiated.- b:TBD- t: Draft framework available

Funding and coordination

UNESCO Entities: Technical support

NWRI: Technical support

FMARD; States MA and En; FMEn: policy direction, facilitation and implementation.


111


- Technical support in the review of regulatory provisions and guidelines for establishment and management of grazing reserves and stock routes updated.

Output 4.3.2: Environmental institutions at Federal, State and LGA levels are capable to implement policies and enforce laws, through multi stakeholders' solutions harnessing indigenous knowledge, innovations and practices for environmental management.

- Capacity development action plan document

- Report from training sessions

- Federal and States MoLHUD reports,

- MFCT Reports Northern Governors Forum, ALGON Reports, State of Nigerian Cities reports.

- Environmental Health policy.

- Preparedness and Response Plan for Environmental Emergencies.

FME: Coordination and facilitation

NESREA: Coordination and implementation.

NOSDRA: Regulations enforcement and coordination of oil sector.

States &MFCT: Funding and coordination.

FMOH, NPHCDA: MoEnv, NESREA, NAEC, NNRA, NIMET: Policy direction, coordination facilitation and implementation.

UNDP- Relevant government

ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs') have increased capacity to develop policies, strategies on regulations and guidelines and plan for implementation

- Institutional capacity for implementation, enforcement and compliance monitoring of environmental standards / regulations by government agencies enhanced.

UNHABITAT: - Capacity of States'

institutions and regulatory frameworks for inclusive and participatory Urban Planning especially for management of peri-urban growth strengthened.

UNITAR- Capacity building

programmes in Environmental Protection and Compliance using UNITAR methodology.

- i: Availability of a capacity assessment of environmental institutions.

- b:TBD - t: Capacity assessment of MDA completed.

- i: Degree of implementation of the capacity development plan.

- b: Zero capacity development plan in place. - t: Capacity development plan implemented.

- i: Level and degree of functional and technical capacities for key government institutions to enforce laws.

- b: Enforcement of environmental laws low. - t: TBD

- i: Number of States adopting improved framework for participatory urban planning.

- b:3 - t: 15

- i: Number of targeted States/FCT with established mechanisms for management of peri-urban expansion.

- b:0 - t: 5

- i: Number of States implementing Comprehensive City Development Strategies.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Environmental Profile for target States available.- b: Availability of updated Maps and publications on

land use and classification.- t: Updated UNOSAT aerial maps.


112


Conducted.

- Local communities and MDAs of Federal and State governments sensitized on biodiversity preservation and management – flora, fauna – in an economically viable manner.

FAO- Information,

communication materials for mass campaign to create Public awareness and improve capacity of MDAS and communities in selected States for sustainable, integrated management and use of land and water resources supported.

WHO - Support the development

of policies for promoting environmental health and sustainable development.

- National capacity to implement preparedness and response plans for environmental emergencies related to climate, water/sanitation, chemicals, radiation and air pollution strengthened and supported.

- I: Updated Environmental Health policy.- b:0 - t:1


113


Output 4.3.3: Partnership developed and capacities of Government, Civil Society and Private sector enhanced to promote a culture of environmental awareness, knowledge and commitment for individual and collective action by youth, entrepreneurs, civil and religious leaders and decision makers.

- CSO annual and assessment reports,

- NCE reports and communiqués

- Federal and State Ministry of Youth Development Reports,

- FMLHUD Reports, Corporate CSR Reports

- Report of green work interventions

- NEMA Reports- Policies- Strategic plan

document- Sustainable

procurement Reports - NIMET Reports- Advocacy reports

FMoE: Coordination and Facilitation, policy direction

FMoYD: Coordination, Funding and policy direction.

Private and Corporate organizations:Implementation of the CSRs

FMoLP: Coordination, Facilitation and policy direction

NEMA: implementation of Community CB

NIMET: Coordination, Facilitation and implementation.

- i: Academia, CSOs and private sector actors partnership platform formed.

- b: Non-existence of common platform between academia, CSOs and the private sector.

- t: TBD

- i: Mechanism for constant feedback and dialogue established.

- b: No feedback mechanism in place for environmental performance.

- t: Environmental performance feedback mechanism available.

- i: Strategy for CSO inclusion in NCE and GEF operations developed.

- b: CSOs not on NCE and GEF's list of implementing partners.

- t: At least 2 CSOs included in GEF and NCE operations

- i: Number of One Stop Youth Centres established and operational.

- b:1 - t: 6- i: Number of CSOs with developed capacities

participating in Africa Urban Agenda process.- b: 0- t: 12

- i: Number of green work interventions.- b:0- t: 12

- i: Number of functional LGA community structures/units established.

- b:: 0- t: 24

- i: Number of federal and State MDAs meetings with capacity in the development of strategic and investment pipeline for climate change and sustainable procurement.

- b: :0

UNDP- By 2015, academia,

CSOs and the private sector advocacy partnership platform group established.

- By 2015, a strategic mechanism/platform for constant regulatory dialogues for sound ecological stewardship at both federal and State levels established

- CSOs inclusion into the National Council on Environment (NCE) and Global Environment facility (GEF) operations achieved

UNHABITAT- Capacities of Youth and

CSOs for effective participation in urban governance and environmental management strengthened

ILO- Capacities of FMLP and

social partners and other stakeholders enhanced to contribute to green jobs.

IOM:- Capacity of NEMA on

Community CB requirements enhanced.

UNOPS - Federal Government


114


supported to develop strategic plan and investment pipeline that integrate the risks and opportunities for sustainable environment and climate change.

- Capacity of federal and target State institutions on sustainable procurement and essential logistics for environmental clean-up and waste management supported.

WMO- Capacity of to promote

stakeholders awareness in the environmental products involving Weather, Climate and water enhanced.

WHO - State and federal

institutions supported to convene and conduct inter-sectoral policy dialogues on improving preparedness, mitigation and management of the health impact of environmental risks and hazards.

- t: : TBD

- i: Number of environmental clean-up / waste management approaches supported.

- b:TBD- t: TBD

- i: Number of institution with capacity to conduct inter-sectoral policy dialogues for health impact environment risks and hazards.

- b: :0 - t: 6

Outcome 4.4: By 2017 migration is harnessed for development through effective management; and threats of irregular migration, illicit drugs, crime and unregulated internal

- Annual and other reports of NIS and NAPTIP and USAID.

- Annual reports of NDLEA and NFIU, Court reports.

As Listed below;- i: Proportion of regular migrants flows vs irregular flows

- b: :0 - t:: 1

- i: Percentage of successful investigations and prosecutions related to illicit drugs and organized

- UNDP- UN Women- WHO- UNICEF- IOM- WMO- FAO


115


migration on Human security are reduced through strengthened law enforcement, border management and reformed regulatory framework for prevention and response that are coordinated by capacitated institutions in partnership with media, civil society organizations, informed by evidence-based, age- and gender sensitive approaches.

Output 4.4.1: The national legal and policy framework for migration, drug-related and organized crime management is strengthened and reformed through laws and policies that are evidence-based, inclusive, age- and gender- responsive.

- Labour Migration Action Plan

- Gazette for laws, Monitoring reports of TWGs for policies

- Reports of inter-ministerial committee

- NBS report- NPoPC reports

FMoLP: Coordination, facilitation and policy direction. NCFR: coordination facilitation development, and implementation of national migration policy.

FMLP: Facilitation and policy direction for the validation and adoption of labor migration policy and development of key labor bilateral agreements.

NPoPC and NBS: Coordination and implementation of National Migration Data Management Strategy

ILO- Capacities of FMoLP and

other stakeholders to implement National Policy on Labour Migration strengthened.

IOM- National Migration and

National Labour Migration Policies adopted and effectively implemented by government MDAs.

- Capacity of key GON stakeholders to generate up-to-date and reliable migration data for evidence-based policy formulation strengthened.

- National migration Data Management Strategy developed and adopted.

- i: Labour Migration Action Plan finalized.- b:0 t: 1

- i: Number of Laws and policies on migration, organized drugs and crime management passed in conformity with Nigeria's international obligations.

- b; :0 - t: 2

- i: Existence of a National Migration and Data Management Strategy.

- b:0- t: 1

- UN HABITAT- UNOPS- UNITAR- UNFPA- UNODC- UNHCR- UNESCO- ILO

crime vs non successful.- b: n/a - t: 50

- i: Number of evidence based, age and gender sensitive researches.

- b:2 - t: 6

- Research reports, MDA statistical reports.


116


Output 4.4.2: Institutional capacities for managing internal migration, harnessing Diaspora for development, prevention of and response to irregular migration and management of regular migration as well as drugs-related and organized crime are strengthened through improved law enforcement and enhanced coordination, data management and border administration and control.

- CATTs repots

- NAPTIP, FMoLP, NIS, NPF reports

- NNVS NBS and NPoPC Reports

NAPTIP: coordination and implementation of counter-trafficking measures.

CSOs: Collaboration and implementation of CATTs.

NIS: coordination and implementation of interventions including generation of migration statistics.

NNVS: Facilitation and management of Diaspora contributions for national development.

NPopC and NBS: generation of migration related data for development planning and policy formulation.

MDAs: facilitation and integration of migration into national policies including post-2015 development agenda.

- i: Number of communities with functional Community Anti-Trafficking Teams (CATTs).

- b:TBD - t: in each endemic State- of(Edo and Delta States

- i: Number of anti-trafficking with enhanced capacity on enforcement and prevention.

- b:TBD - t: TBD

- i: Existence of sector wide coordination mechanisms for migration management and drugs and organized crime.

- b:2- t: 7

- i: Availability of reliable database related to migration, illicit drugs and organized crime.

- b:30% - t: 60%

- i: Percentage detection of irregular cross border movements of people and illicit goods

- b:10%- t: 55%

UNWOMEN- Effective functioning of

Community-based prevention and response mechanisms for addressing Trafficking in Persons established and supported.

ILO- Capacities of anti-human

trafficking agencies for improved enforcement and prevention of irregular migration through awareness and cooperation strengthened.

IOM- The capacity of NIS to

address irregular migration and unregulated internal migration enhanced.

- The capacity of NNVS to mobilize Diaspora for development through transfer of skills and remittances enhanced.

- The capacity of NPopC and NBS to generate and publish migration data in a timely manner strengthened.


117

GOVERNANCE AND RULE OF LAW

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

UNDP 81,100,000 6,100,000 0 75,000,000

UNICEF 22,300,000 17,600,000 0 4,700,000

UNODC 79,355,710 78,075,710 0 1,280,000

UNWOMEN 1,575,000 1,575,000 0 0

UNOPS 500,000 50,000 0 450,000

ILO 460,000 460,000 0 0

UNHCR 280,000 200,000 0 80,000

UNITAR 1,750,000 1,400,000 0 350,000

UNESCO 75,000 30,000 0 45,000

IFAD 7,000,000 7,000,000 0 0

Total Theme 1 ($) 194,395,710 112,490,710 0 81,905,000

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

UNDP 6,400,000 400,000 0 6,000,000

UNICEF 8,400,000 6,900,000 0 1,500,000

UNODC 78,585,761 77,305,761 0 1,280,000

UNWOMEN 520,000 520,000 0 0

UNOPS 500,000 50,000 0 450,000

ILO 60,000 60,000 0 0

UNHCR 280,000 200,000 0 80,000

ILO 400,000 400,000 0 0

UNDP 7,500,000 500,000 0 7,000,000

UNICEF 4,700,000 3,500,000 0 1,200,000

UNWOMEN 360,000 360,000 0 0

UNITAR 875,000 700,000 0 175,000

UNODC 769,949 769,949 0 0

UNDP 15,500,000 1,500,000 0 14,000,000

UNWOMEN 50,000 50,000 0 0

UNDP 10,800,000 800,000 0 10,000,000

UNWOMEN 370,000 370,000 0 0

UNDP 15,900,000 900,000 0 15,000,000

UNESCO 75,000 30,000 0 45,000

IFAD 2,333,333 2,333,333 0 0

UNDP 20,900,000 900,000 0 20,000,000

IFAD 2,333,333 2,333,333 0 0

UNDP 500,000 500,000 0 0

UNICEF 4,600,000 3,600,000 0 1,000,000

UNWOMEN 275,000 275,000 0 0

IFAD 2,333,333 2,333,333 0 0

UNDP 3,600,000 600,000 0 3,000,000

UNICEF 4,600,000 3,600,000 0 1,000,000

UNITAR 875,000 700,000 0 175,000

81,905,000TOTAL GAP Theme 1 ($)

1.1.1: Capacity at Federal and State level for coordination, law

reforms and service delivery for Justice Sector institutions to

provide inclusive, age- and gender-responsive, equitable and

timely access to Justice, and for anti-corruption institutions to

prevent and regulate corruption, is strengthened.

Agencies Indic. Res. Contr. UNDAF

Resource Contributions UAP

Thematic Area 1 Summary:

Democratic processes: Local governance/decentralization and

the Rule of Law: Accountability and anti-corruption.

Outputs Agencies Indic. Res. Contr. UNDAF


1.4.1. Replicable Model of Local Governance in place for

evidence-based advocacy to influence decentralization and

deconcentration of power and resources in an inclusive manner

to the local government and communities.

1.4.2. Strengthened accountability mechanisms at local and

community levels on development priorities for promoting

inclusive equitable and gender responsive participatory

planning, budgetary processes and monitoring and evaluation.

1.4.3. Improved institutional capacity of local government and

urban governance to coordinate, plan, generate resources,

implement and monitor, for equitable delivery of services.

1.1.2: Capacity of CSOs, including their internal governance

mechanisms, and for constructive dialogue between Civil

society organizations, media, other stakeholders and

government are strengthened to enable civil society to monitor

the budgetary and judicial processes, anti-corruption institutions,

and can play their watchdog role.

1.2.1 : Election management bodies’ (especially Independent

National Electoral Commission) capacity strengthened in strategic

planning, policy formulation and administration of elections.

1.2.2. Political parties have strengthened platforms and mechanisms

(IPAC, INEC, Civil Society) to promote human rights, women’s

participation, respect for non-violence and democratic processes and

their implications for democratic development.

1.2.3. CSOs, traditional leaders, women’s groups and other key

stakeholders are able to conduct civic education and advocacy

for affirmative action to increase women’s participation in politics

and the electoral process.

Annex 1: UNDAF Resource Table


118

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

6,100,000 6,050,000 50,000

92,000,000 64,000,000 28,000,000

1,000,000 1,000,000 0

280,000 160,000 120,000

2,100,000 100,000 2,000,000

101,480,000 71,310,000 0 30,170,000

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

50,000 20,000 0 30,000

20,000,000 14,108,800 0 5,891,200

1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0

6,000,000 6,000,000 0 0

280,000 160,000 0 120,000

36,000,000 24,945,600 0 11,054,400

2,100,000 100,000 0 2,000,000

50,000 30,000 0 20,000

36,000,000 24,945,600 0 11,054,400

. 30,170,000TOTAL GAP Theme 2 ($)

Indic. Res. Contr. UNDAF




SOCIAL CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT - EDUCATION

UNESCO

UNICEF

ILO

UNHCR

UNOPS

Total Theme 2 ($)

UNESCO

UNICEF

ILO

UNESCO

UNHCR

UNICEF

UNOPS

UNESCO

UNICEF

2.1.2. Enhanced capacity at all levels of the Federation for

the implementation of education sector strategic and

operational plans, that increase enrolment and retention of

school-aged children (including Early Childhood), and

illiterate adults, especially girls, women and other vulnerable

groups, through awareness creation, stimulation of demand,

enhanced infrastructure and staffing management, and

development of models for increased access and

affordability.

2.1.3. Strengthened human and institutional capacities for

child/learner-centred, interactive teaching and quality

assurance at all levels of educational service provision in

Nigeria, enhance innovativeness, functionality, relevance,

market-driven knowledge and skills acquisition and overall

child/girl-friendly schooling and transitioning in formal and

non-formal schools.

Thematic Area 2 Summary::

Education Management, Access and Quality.

Agencies

Outputs Agencies

2.1.1. Advocacy, programming and budgeting capacities of

Federal, State and LGA Education stakeholders

strengthened to design, cost, mobilize resources,

coordinate, monitor and document evidence-based, equity

focused, gender responsive education sector strategies,

policies, operational plans and innovative models.


119

SOCIAL CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT - HEALTH/HIV

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

UNHCR 700,000 520,000 0 180,000

UNICEF 288,800,000 211,116,975 0 77,683,025

WHO 175,744,317 175,744,317 0 0

FAO 12,000,000 8,500,000 0 3,500,000

UNFPA 53,000,000 51,000,000 0 2,000,000

UNWOMEN 590,000 590,000 0 0

UNOPS 2,550,000 150,000 0 2,400,000

ILO 710,000 710,000 0 0

UNAIDS 1,450,000 1,450,000 0 0

UNESCO 350,000 160,000 0 190,000

UNDP 1,500,000 500,000 0 1,000,000

UNODC 409,750 409,750 0 0

Total Theme 3 ($) 537,804,067 450,851,042 0 86,953,025


WASH, Nutrition & Food Security, Wash, MNCAH,

Communicable & Non-Communicable disease; National

Coordination Mechanisms, Demand creation, PMTCT,

Adolescents prevention, knowledge.



Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

UNHCR 150,000 100,000 0 50,000

UNICEF 86,000,000 66,748,075 0 19,251,925

WHO 993,667 993,667 0 0

FAO 12,000,000 8,500,000 0 3,500,000

UNICEF 80,000,000 80,000,000 0 0

WHO 656,000 656,000 0 0

UNFPA 36,000,000 36,000,000 0 0

UNHCR 360,000 260,000 0 100,000

UNICEF 96,000,000 49,568,900 0 46,431,100

UNWOMEN 170,000 170,000 0 0

WHO 148,494,684 148,494,684 0 0

2.2.4. Capacities of Federal, State, LGAs, Civil Society

Organizations, Academia, and private sector are

strengthened to plan, update and implement relevant

standards and guidelines for Communicable and Non

Communicable Disease services utilizing innovative

technologies; informed by gender responsive policies, funded

and disseminated research, with application of

communication strategies to increase awareness and

demand; enhance disease surveillance and ensure timely

response to outbreaks.

2.2.1. Public agencies and Civil Society Organizations at

federal, state, and LGA levels are able to implement updated,

harmonized, evidence based, gender responsive policies and

plans to facilitate equitable access to quality water supply and

sanitation services and the practice of good hygiene by

vulnerable populations and institutions based on innovative

communication for development and coordination systems.

2.2.2. Capacities of government and partners at all levels

including inter-sectoral linkage and coordination are

strengthened to implement high impact, equitable, gender

responsive and innovative nutrition and food security

interventions, enhance nutrition friendly agricultural

productivity especially at household level and promote crop

and livestock diversification to improve nutrition outcomes

(reduced stunting, acute malnutrition and micronutrient

deficiencies rates) amongst most vulnerable groups

especially children and women.

2.2.3. Capacities of public and private health institutions

including Civil Society Organizations at all levels

strengthened to deliver accessible, equitable, quality, gender-

responsive, evidence-based and, adequately funded,

reproductive ,maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health

interventions inclusive of sexual reproductive health; using

innovations and appropriate technology (including new

vaccines and ICT) and responding to increased demand and

use of preventive, curative and promotive health services by

empowered and involved communities; supported by

enhanced Health Management Information System.



20,398,632 20,398,632WHO 0 0


120

WHO 1,079,778 1,079,778 0 0

UNOPS 1,550,000 50,000 0 1,500,000

ILO 160,000 160,000 0 0

UNAIDS 250,000 250,000 0 0

UNHCR 190,000 160,000 0 30,000

UNODC 409,750 409,750 0 0

UNAIDS 500,000 500,000 0 0

UNFPA 3,000,000 1,000,000 0 2,000,000

UNICEF 16,080,000 8,880,000 0 7,200,000

WHO 654,000 654,000 0 0

UNOPS 1,000,000 100,000 0 900,000

UNAIDS 250,000 250,000 0 0

UNESCO 350,000 160,000 0 190,000

UNFPA 14,000,000 14,000,000 0 0

UNICEF 10,720,000 5,920,000 0 4,800,000

WHO 1,733,778 1,733,778 0 0

ILO 150,000 150,000 0 0

UNAIDS 350,000 350,000 0 0

UNWOMEN 120,000 120,000 0 0

WHO 1,733,778 1,733,778 0 0


2.3.3. Increased capacity at Federal state and LGA level for

coordination, integration and delivery of quality eMTCT

services, promotion of community involvement and data

collection and management systems.

2.3.4. Increased capacity of key institutions for equitable

delivery of combination prevention interventions for

adolescents and young people, especially the most at risk

and those living with HIV, through inclusive strategic

partnerships and coordination platforms that support

innovative knowledge management and demand creation.

2.3.5. Gender disaggregated strategic knowledge generated

and required tools and mechanisms put in place at State and

LGA levels to inform innovative, equitable HIV programming.

2.3.2. The capacity of institutions strengthened for increased

Behavior Change Communication and demand creation for

HIV prevention, treatment, care and support services in the

general population in an equitable manner.

ILO 400,000 400,000 0 0

UNAIDS 100,000 100,000 0 0

UNDP 1,500,000 500,000 0 1,000,000

UNWOMEN 300,000 300,000 0 0

2.3.1. National coordination mechanisms and partnerships

strengthened to promote an equitable enabling environment

for PLHIV implement innovative policies and plans and

establish logistic management systems through enhanced

leadership capacity.


121

SOCIAL CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT - SOCIAL PROTECTION

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

ILO 750,000 750,000 0 0

UNDP 1,500,000 500,000 0 1,000,000

UNFPA 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0

UNHCR 295,000 200,000 0 95,000

UNICEF 29,400,000 21,500,000 0 7,900,000

UNWOMEN 920,000 920,000 0 0

UNODC 1,079,862 1,079,862 0 0

WHO 1,646,000 1,646,000 0 0

Total Theme 4 ($) 36,590,862 27,595,862 0 8,995,000

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

ILO 250,000 250,000 0 0

UNDP 1,500,000 500,000 0 1,000,000

UNICEF 4,600,000 3,600,000 0 1,000,000

UNODC 797,383 797,383 0 0

ILO 500,000 500,000 0 0

UNFPA 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0

UNHCR 295,000 200,000 0 95,000

UNICEF 4,600,000 3,600,000 0 1,000,000

UNODC 154,470 154,470 0 0

WHO 1,646,000 1,646,000 0 0

UNICEF 6,200,000 4,300,000 0 1,900,000

UNWOMEN 720,000 720,000 0 0

UNODC 57,020 57,020 0 0

UNICEF 14,000,000 10,000,000 0 4,000,000

UNWOMEN 200,000 200,000 0 0

UNODC 70,989 70,989 0 0

8,995,000


Social protection Policy/Framework; social protection

mechanisms, capacity for social welfare, social engagement





TOTAL GAP Theme4 ($)

2.4.1. Age-appropriate and Gender-sensitive, fiscally

sustainable National social protection policy and framework

developed based on context-specific, innovative, replicable

and evidence-based models

2.4.2. Capacities of public and community institutions,

including CSOs are enhanced to design, implement,

monitor and evaluate social protection mechanisms at all

levels; translating to increased utilization of accessible and

affordable essential social services.

2.4.3. Decision-making capacities are strengthened at all

levels through evidence based advocacy and learning,

including South-south cooperation; to endorse, mobilize and

commit resources to equitable and gender responsive social

protection mechanisms.

2.4.4. Formal and non-formal social engagement systems

and networks in identified groups and communities are able

to participate in equitable and sustainable social

development through development and utilization of

evidence-based social communication tools, channels and

mechanisms.


122

UNIDO

UNOPS

UNIDO

UNWOMEN

UNITAR

UNOPS

FAO

IFAD

ILO

UNDP

UNIDO

UNWOMEN

3.2.3 . Capacity of the national energy institutions and the

private sector operators strengthened to develop, coordinate

and monitor energy policy implementation, develop

framework to enhance equitable access and manufacturing

of low cost renewable energy equipments, and develop

requisite skills and know-how to promote energy efficiency in

domestic and industrial use. 3.3.1. National Policies and strategies for strengthening

productivity and enterprise development that is gender-

responsive and youth-inclusive endorsed and monitored;

with implementation framework put in place and

operationalized at the federal and state levels for increased

job opportunities, income, wealth creation and poverty

reduction.

Regular Resources

Other Resources

8,750,000 8,750,000

28,500,000 8,000,000

48,700,000 30,600,000

1,600,000 1,600,000

24,000,000 2,423,000

7,200,000 320,000

1,500,000 1,200,000

69,300,000 69,300,000

880,000 400,000

190,430,000 122,593,000

Regular Resources

Other Resources

2,000,000 2,000,000

1,600,000 600,000

1,000,000 500,000

320,000 320,000

9,500,000 452,000

2,100,000 600,000

1,000,000 400,000

1,700,000 700,000

10,000,000 5,000,000

1,500,000 500,000





EQUITABLE & SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

ILO

UNDP

UNIDO

UNWOMEN

FAO

UNOPS

UNITAR

IFAD

UNHCR

Total Theme 5 ($)

ILO

UNDP

UNIDO

UNWOMEN

FAO

UNDP

UNIDO

UNDP

UNIDO

UNDP

Agencies

Outputs Agencies

A national, sectorally-linked and inclusive investment

policy developed with implementation plan and coordination

mechanism across Federal and State levels put in place;

administered by strengthened Federal and State Ministries,

Departments and Agencies (MDAs); for enhanced ease of

doing business, increased domestic investment and capital

inflow and increased employment generation.

Institutional and human capacities of investment

related Federal and state ministries, Departments and

Agencies, CSOs and relevant private sector stakeholders

strengthened, through technological and knowledge

acquisition to deliver high standard and equitable service,

monitor and regulate compliance and provide investment

support services.. Energy supply diversification strategies and practices

to promote the use of renewable energy sources

strengthened and integrated into the national energy policy

through support to the energy-related MDAs to ensure

equitable and affordable access for productive and domestic

. South-South Cooperation strengthened to expand the

adoption and use of green technologies for the promotion

and use of renewable energy sources such as hydropower,

biomass, solar and wind; local equipment manufacturing

reducing cost of energy to end users.


Investment climate; energy; productivity; trade; employment

2,000,000 1,000,000 0 1,000,000

100,000 100,000 0 0

2,000,000 1,200,000 0 800,000

200,000 200,000 0 0

625,000 500,000 0 125,000

100,000 100,000 0 0

1,000,000 471,000 0 529,000

500,000 500,000 0 0

500,000 500,000 0 0

3,600,000 600,000 0 3,000,000

700,000 400,000 0 300,000

220,000 220,000 0 0

Gap

0 0

0 20,500,000

0 18,100,000

0 0

0 21,577,000

0 6,880,000

0 300,000

0 0

0 480,000

0 67,837,000

Gap

0 0

0 1,000,000

0 500,000

0 0

0 9,048,000

0 1,500,000

0 600,000

0 1,000,000

0 5,000,000

0 1,000,000

3.1.1.

3.1.2.

3.2.1

uses.

3.2.2


123

FAO

IFAD

ILO

UNDP

UNIDO

UNWOMEN

FAO

IFAD

ILO

UNDP

UNIDO

UNWOMEN

UNDP

UNIDO

UNOPS

3.3.2. Entrepreneurial skills of small and medium scale

producers to grow into commercial enterprises strengthened

through innovative and adaptive models of technology

acquisition, transfer and diffusion of green technologies that

increase productivity, reduce cost of production, provides

more job opportunities especially to youth and women.

3.3.3. Strategies for enhanced valued added production

developed, implementation plan, coordination mechanism

and framework for integrating inputs suppliers, producers,

processors and marketers established; leading to economic

diversification, increased job opportunities, enhanced

income and poverty reduction especially for women and

youth.3.3.4 . Human and institutional capacities of relevant

government agencies, and private sector institutions, of the

productive subsectors of the economy built to enhance

productivity at primary and secondary levels through

strengthened Vocational, Business and Entrepreneurship

acquisition and training centers, extension agencies to

provide equitable and gender responsive opportunities for

economic growth.

UNDP

UNIDO

UNWOMEN

FAO

UNDP

UNIDO

ILO

UNDP

UNIDO

FAO

IFAD

ILO

UNDP

UNHCR

UNIDO

UNWOMEN

UNITAR

3.4.2. Relevant Trade and Investment MDAs are able to

develop and monitor the implementation of trade policy that

boost domestic trade and promote international trade; MDAs

and other trade related institutions are able to promote and

negotiate trade with partners through strengthened capacity

in line with international best practices; trade capacity

building and quality infrastructure; to expand, diversify and

enhance global competitiveness.

3.5.1. A national employment policy that promotes

labour–based technologies with high employment multiplier

and decent jobs put in place; leading to the broadening of

the productive base and expansion of employment

opportunities; accompanied by implementation plan and

coordination mechanism developed and endorsed at federal

level and systematically adopted at state and LGAs levels.

3.5.2. Human and institutional capacities of relevant Federal

and State MDAs, workers and private sector organizations

strengthened to develop, coordinate and monitor the

implementation of pro-poor, gender-responsive, youth-

inclusive and evidence-based employment policy; support

the development of entrepreneurial vocational and ICT skills.

3.4.1. National Trade policy endorsed, with implementation

plan developed and adopted, and coordination mechanism

put in place to deepen and diversify domestic and foreign

trade, and facilitate Nigeria’s trade relations with other

countries; stimulate production and enhance inter-sectoral

linkages and trade opportunities.

8,000,000 1,000,000 0 7,000,000

14,600,000 14,600,000 0 0

1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0

2,500,000 500,000 0 2,000,000

2,000,000 1,000,000 0 1,000,000

220,000 220,000 0 0

1,000,000 500,000 0 500,000

26,500,000 26,500,000 0 0

800,000 800,000 0 0

1,500,000 500,000 0 1,000,000

5,000,000 4,000,000 0 1,000,000

200,000 200,000 0 0

1,500,000 500,000 0 1,000,000

2,500,000 1,600,000 0 900,000

7,000,000 120,000 0 6,880,000

1,500,000 500,000 0 1,000,000

6,000,000 4,000,000 0 2,000,000

320,000 320,000 0 0

2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000

1,500,000 500,000 0 1,000,000

14,000,000 10,000,000 0 4,000,000

450,000 450,000 0 0

7,000,000 2,000,000 0 5,000,000

1,000,000 500,000 0 500,000

2,500,000 0 0 2,500,000

27,700,000 27,700,000 0 0

4,000,000 4,000,000 0 0

2,500,000 500,000 0 2,000,000

880,000 400,000 0 480,000

1,500,000 1,000,000 0 500,000

120,000 120,000 0 0

875,000 700,000 0 175,000



124

362,500 338,000 0 24,500

3,320,000 1,120,000 0 2,200,000

7,000,000 2,000,000 0 5,000,000

6,000,000 1,130,990 0 4,869,010

7,000,000 2,000,000 0 5,000,000

1,000,000 60,000 0 940,000

38,000 38,000 0 0

6,000,000 0 0 6,000,000

4,000,000 1,000,000 0 3,000,000

580,000 300,000 0 280,000

100,000 100,000 0 0

625,000 500,000 0 125,000

993,667 993,667 0 0


1,500,000

240,000

1,875,333

3,656,431

5,000,000

1,500,000

732,000

1,875,333

700,000

1,500,000

3,000,000

500,000

6,000,000

875,000

1,875,333

5,000,000

2,600,000

UNDP

UNWOMEN

WHO

IOM

FAO

UNDP

UNWOMEN

WHO

FAO

UNDP

UNFPA

UNHABITAT

UNICEF

UNITAR

WHO

UNOPS

UNDP

4.1.1. The national legal and policy framework for

emergency coordination, risk reduction and response is

strengthened in conformity with international standards and

systematically cascaded at state level.

Outputs Agencies

4.1.2. An improved and integrated EW/EA system covering

the three tiers of the Federation that produces timely and

actionable gender disaggregated, equity sensitive

information, direction and advice for decision makers,

agencies, CSOs and communities.

4.1.3. Strengthened institutional capacity to coordinate,

prepare for and respond to emergencies and to enhance

coping capacity of communities (including safety nets).

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

500,000 0 1,000,000

240,000 0 0

1,875,333 0 0

1,156,431 0 2,500,000

0 0 5,000,000

500,000 0 1,000,000

732,000 0 0

1,875,333 0 0

0 0 700,000

500,000 0 1,000,000

3,000,000 0 0

100,000 0 400,000

2,000,000 0 4,000,000

700,000 0 175,000

1,875,333 0 0

0 0 5,000,000

600,000 0 2,000,000


UNESCO

UNHCR

4.2.2. An improved and integrated conflict EW/EA system

covering the three tiers of the Federation that produces

timely and actionable gender disaggregated, equity-sensitive

conflict analysis, strategic directions including do no harm

alternatives, and guidance for decision makers, agencies,

CSOs and communities. UNDP

FAO

UNDP

UNHABITAT

UNWOMEN

FAO

UNDP

UNHABITAT

UNWOMEN

UNITAR

WHO

4.2.1. National peace architecture established through

advocacy and strengthened to systematically and

institutionally promote tolerance, a culture of peace, dialogue

and support negotiated solutions in order to prevent, mitigate

and respond timely to conflict and violence disturbing life,

especially of the most vulnerable.

4.3.1. A comprehensive national regulatory framework is

developed in line with ratified international protocols and its

implementation supported for the sustainable management

of Nigeria’s natural resources including land, water, air, oil,

biodiversity, natural habitats and extractive industries.

4.3.2. Environmental institutions at Federal, state and LGA

levels are capable to implement policies and enforce laws,

through multi stakeholders solutions harnessing indigenous

knowledge, innovations and practices for environmental

management

HUMAN SECURITY & RISK MANAGEMENT


17,700,000

27,288,000

3,000,000

2,080,000

6,000,000

1,500,000

6,918,333

6,500,000

1,568,000

23,124,008

362,500

3,320,000

3,500,000

44,635,807

147,496,648

FAO

UNDP

UNFPA

UNHABITAT

UNICEF

UNITAR

WHO

UNOPS

UNWOMEN

IOM

UNESCO

UNHCR

ILO

UNODC

Total Theme 6 ($)


DRR & Emergency response, conflict prevention &

Management, protection of the environment, migration &

drug/crime management

Agencies Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

1,130,990 0 16,569,010

7,788,000 0 19,500,000

3,000,000 0 0

460,000 0 1,620,000

2,000,000 0 4,000,000

1,200,000 0 300,000

6,918,333 0 0

60,000 0 6,440,000

1,568,000 0 0

8,624,008 0 14,500,000

338,000 0 24,500

1,120,000 0 2,200,000

3,500,000 0 0

44,635,807 0 0

82,343,138 0 65,153,510



125

2,188,000 688,000 0 1,500,000

38,000 38,000 0 0

298,667 298,667 0 0

1,500,000 60,000 0 1,440,000

3,500,000 3,500,000 0 0

120,000 120,000 0 0

44,614,135 44,614,135 0 0

300,000 300,000 0 0

21,672 21,672 0 0

19,467,577 7,467,577 0 12,000,000

65,153,510TOTAL THEME 6 ($)

UNDP

UNWOMEN

WHO

UNOPS

ILO

UNWOMEN

UNODC

UNWOMEN

UNODC

IOM

4.3.3. Partnership developed and capacities of Government,

Civil Society and Private sector enhanced to promote a

culture of environmental awareness, knowledge and

commitment for individual and collective action by youth,

entrepreneurs, civil and religious leaders and decision

makers.

4.4.1. The national legal and policy framework for migration,

drug-related and organized crime management is

strengthened and reformed through laws and policies that

are evidence-based, inclusive, age- and gender- responsive.

4.4.2. Institutional capacities for managing internal migration,

harnessing Diaspora for development, prevention of and

response to irregular migration and management of regular

migration as well as drugs-related and organized crime are

strengthened through improved law enforcement and

enhanced coordination, data management and border

administration and control.


126

CROSS CUTTING

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

UNDP 21,300,000 2,300,000 0 19,000,000

UNESCO 90,000 22,000 0 68,000

UNFPA 20,000,000 20,000,000 0 0

UNHCR 240,000 200,000 0 40,000

UNICEF 24,300,000 17,900,000 0 6,400,000

UNWOMEN 1,374,980 1,374,980 0 0

UNODC 203,115 203,115 0 0

WHO 8,919,110 8,919,110 0 0

UNITAR 562,500 450,000 0 112,500

FAO 4,097,000 200,000 0 3,897,000

IFAD 0 0 0 0

ILO 1,350,000 1,350,000 0 0

Total Theme 7 ($) 82,436,705 52,919,205 0 29,517,500

Regular Resources

Other Resources

Gap

UNDP 13,800,000 800,000 0 13,000,000

UNESCO 40,000 22,000 0 18,000

UNFPA 5,000,000 5,000,000 0 0

UNHCR 240,000 200,000 0 40,000

UNICEF 4,700,000 3,900,000 0 800,000

UNWOMEN 599,980 599,980 0 0

UNODC 75,785 75,785 0 0

WHO 654,000 654,000 0 0

ILO 350,000 350,000 0 0

UNWOMEN 500,000 500,000 0 0

UNESCO 50,000 0 0 50,000

UNODC 86,383 86,383 0 0

UNDP 3,700,000 700,000 0 3,000,000

UNICEF 5,600,000 4,000,000 0 1,600,000

UNWOMEN 275,000 275,000 0 0

UNITAR 562,500 450,000 0 112,500

UNODC 40,947 40,947 0 0

WHO 4,459,555 4,459,555 0 0

FAO 4,097,000 200,000 0 3,897,000

IFAD 0 0 0 0

ILO 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0

UNDP 3,800,000 800,000 0 3,000,000

UNFPA 15,000,000 15,000,000 0 0

UNICEF 14,000,000 10,000,000 0 4,000,000

WHO 3,805,555 3,805,555 0 0

29,517,500

1.5.1. National and State Planning institutions have

strengthened capacity for coordination, evidence-based and

gender-responsive planning, budgeting, reporting,

monitoring, and evaluation on VISION 20:2020, other

national priorities and related UNDAF-supported priorities.

1.5.2. Statistical agencies, line MDAs and research

institutions are better able to generate, analyse and use

quality, timely disaggregated data and make it accessible for

evidence-based decision-making and programming.

TOTAL GAP Theme 7 ($)


Human Rights & Gender Equality, Evidence Based decision

making, Youth, Data for development, HIV/AIDS, etc





1.3.1. Institutional and community capacities are

strengthened for gender and age-appropriate prevention,

protection, reliable and timely monitoring and reporting and

redress of human rights violations.

1.3.2. Capacity for legislative and regulatory reform at

Federal and State level in compliance with international

norms and standards and Nigeria’s commitments to human

rights and gender equality is strengthened.

1.3.3. Public, civil society, communities and media are

empowered to advocate for, report and demand greater

state promotion, respect, and protection of human rights and

to form social engagement systems and networks to

participate in equitable and sustainable social development

through utilization of evidence-based social communication

tools, channels and mechanisms.


127

RegularResources

OtherResources

Gap

Thematic Area 1: Good Governance & Rule of Law 194,395,710 112,490,710 0 81,905,000

Thematic Area 2: Social Capital Development -

Education 101,480,000 71,310,000 0 30,170,000


Health/HIV 537,804,067 450,851,042 0 86,953,025


Social Protection 36,590,862 27,595,862 0 8,995,000

Thematic Area 5: Equitable and Sustainable Economic

Development 190,430,000 122,593,000 0 67,837,000

Thematic Area 6: Human Security and Risk Management 147,496,648 82,343,138 0 65,153,510

Thematic Area 7: Cross-cutting 82,436,705 52,919,205 0 29,517,500

TOTAL 1,290,633,992 920,102,957 0 370,531,035

UNDAP Thematic Area Indic. Res. Req. UNDAP

Resource Contributions to UNDAF Plan byUN agencies in Nigeria


128

Annex 2: UNDAF/P Lead/Co-Leads

and Thematic Groups Matrix

UNDAF/P: Approved Leads and Co-Leads for UNDAF III

Result

Area

Result Area Lead Agency Co-Lead

Agency

Good Governance1 UNDP UNODC

Social Capital Development2 UNICEF WHO

Equitable & Sustainable Economic Growth 3 UNIDO ILO

Human Security & Risk Management 4 UNHCR IOM/UNODC

UNDAF Action Plan Results Matrix for NigeriaThematic Groups

Groups and

result areasOutcomes Participating agencies

Group 1- Good

Governance,

Rule of Law

Democratic processes

Local

governance/decentralization

Rule of Law

Accountability and anti-

corruption

UNDP (lead),UNODC (co-

lead),UNOPS,UNHCR, UNICEF,

UNWOMEN,ILO,UNESCO,WHO,IFAD,

UNITAR, UNHABITAT

Group 2-Social capital

development-

Education

Management

Access

Quality

UNICEF(lead), UNESCO(co-lead), ILO,

UNHCR,UNOPS,

Group 3- Social capital

development -

Health/HIV

WASH, Nutrition & Food

Security, Wash, MNCAH,

Communicable & Non-

Communicable disease;

National Coordination

Mechanisms, Demand

creation, PMTCT,

Adolescents prevention,

knowledge.

WHO (lead) UNICEF(co-lead),UNFPA,

UNHCR,

FAO,UNWOMEN,ILO,UNAIDS,UNDP,

UNOPS, UNODC


129

Groups and

result areasOutcomes Participating agencies

Group 4- Social capital

development -Social

Protection

Social protection

Policy/Framework; social

protection mechanisms,

capacity for social welfare,

social engagement

UNICEF (lead), UNFPA (co-lead), ILO,

UNODC, UNDP,

UNHCR,WHO,UNWOMEN,

Group 5-Equitable

&Sustainable

economic growth

Investment climate; energy;

productivity; trade;

employment

UNIDO (lead), ILO (co-lead),

FAO,UNDP, UNWOMEN, UNOPS,

IFAD, UNHCR, UNITAR

Group 6-Human

Security & Risk

Management

DRR & Emergency response,

conflict prevention &

Management, protection of

the environment, migration &

crime management

UNDP (lead),UNODC (co-lead), IOM ,

UNWOMEN, WHO, FAO, UNHCR,

UNFPA,UNHABITAT, UNICEF, UNITAR,

UNOPS, WMO

Group 7-Cross cutting Human Rights & Gender

Equality, Evidence Based

decision making, Youth, Data

for development, HIV/AIDS,

etc

UNFPA (lead), UNWOMEN (co-lead),

UNDP, UNODC,

UNESCO,UNHCR,UNICEF, WHO,ILO,

UNITAR, IFAD, FAO,

UNDAF III Flagship States

Lead UN Agency

1 Borno

UNICEF

2 Oyo UNIDO

3 Benue

UNICEF

4 Lagos WHO

5 Anambra UNICEF 6 Cross River

UNFPA

7 FCT FAO

8 Niger UNDP

9 Ekiti UNDP10 Kogi UNIDO

Name of State

11 Gombe TBD

12 Zamfara TBD

13 Taraba TBD


130

Annex 3: Terms of Reference for Steering Committee, UNDAF Results Leads/Co Leads, Thematic Leads,

State Boards and Coordination Mechanisms

Terms of Reference - UNDAF Steering Committee (SC)

The Steering Committee, co-chaired by the Minister of the National Planning Commission

and the UN Resident Coordinator, will comprise of key partner Ministries, members of the

UN Country team (UNCT) (participating on rotational basis) and Heads of the Civil Society.

Members shall include senior Representatives of the Minister, Federal Ministry of Health;

Trade & Industry; Agriculture, Labour & Productivity; Women Affairs & Social Development,

Environment, Education; Justice, Representatives of the Director-General, NACA; NHRC;

Country Director, Action Aid, Nigeria, Director-General, Center for Democratic

Development; The Director, White Ribbon Alliance; The Director, Gender & Affirmative

Action; Representative from NACCIMA; NECA/MAN.

Mandate and purpose

The SC ensures that the UN's interventions are closely aligned to the national priorities.The

SC will therefore be responsible for providing overall strategic policy guidance and direction

for the implementation of UNDAF III and its Action Plan. The SC will provide effective

oversight and leadership required for all activities implemented under the framework of the

UNDAF III.

Roles and Responsibilities

The SC will provide guidance that increases efficiency and effectiveness, limits overlaps

and spurs synergies which ultimately reduces transactional costs for all partners and

ensures measurable results are achieved within the accountability framework provided by

the UNDAF and UAP. Specific tasks include:

Policy Guidance

Ÿ Ensure that strategic priorities indicated in the UNDAF III are implemented in alignment

to national priorities.

Resource Mobilization and Allocation

Ÿ Provide oversight and guidance on the implementation of the resource mobilization

strategy.

Programme design and delivery

Ÿ Receive regular updates from the UNCT in order to assess progress in programme

delivery and collectively undertake required actions to fast track implementation.

Ÿ Review the progress of the implementation of the UNDAF/P and provide succinct

recommendations for improvements as and when necessary.

Ÿ


131

Strategic Partnership and Coordination

Ÿ Engage in high level advocacy, discussions and activities that promote the Delivering

as One modality.

Ÿ Ensure effective consultation between the UN, Government at all levels, Development

Partners, CSOs, private sector and all other stakeholders that may be identified.

Decision Making

The Steering Committee will make decisions by consensus. Decisions of the Steering

Committee shall be duly recorded.

Working Arrangements

The Steering Committee will meet once a year to review progress of implementation, to

endorse UNCT recommendations related to programme and resource allocations and also

validate anticipatory approvals granted for special circumstances by the Resident

Coordination in lieu of a formal SC meeting, and Annual Review meetings (when One Fund

is established). The SC can also convene extra-ordinary meetings on specific issues. The

UN Resident Coordinator's office provides secretarial support to the SC and assists in the

organization, preparation and follows up of meetings. The RCO will work closely with the

relevant departments at NPC for the effective functioning of the SC.

Review of the Terms of Reference

The Terms of Reference may be reviewed as part of the annual review process and may be

amended as deemed necessary.


132

Terms of Reference – UN Country Team (UNCT)

The UNCT is chaired by the Resident Coordinator (RC) and comprises of all Heads of UN

Agencies; resident and non-resident in the country.

Mandate and purpose

The UNCT will be responsible for the UNDAF/P direction, planning, implementation, and

monitoring and evaluation in line with UNCT code of conduct, DaO principles, the

recommendations of the SC and the UN global commitments.


Under the leadership of the RC, the UNCT will be responsible for developing and

implementing a Resource Mobilization Strategy (RMS) and coordinating the preparation 12

and submission of a One Fund allocation proposal to the SC in accordance with Allocation

Criteria ToRs to be determined.

Decision Making

The UNCT will make decisions by majority. Decisions of the UNCT shall be duly recorded.

Prior to presenting agency positions on significant issues to the UNCT, UN agencies are to

ensure internal agency concurrence in the spirit of the DaO.


The UNCT will meet monthly – the first to endorse PMT recommendations related to

programme and resource allocations and also validate anticipatory approvals granted for

special circumstances by the Resident Coordinator in lieu of a formal UNCT meeting. The

UNCT can also convene extra-ordinary meetings on specific issues. The UN Resident

Coordinator's office provides secretarial support to the UNCT and assists in the

organization, preparation and follows up of meetings.

12 UNCT plans to set up One Fund and/or Common Budgetary Framework to reinforce joint UN programmes and assist in meeting the resource gaps for UNDAP through the RMS. The RC will lead joint resource mobilization efforts targeting increased domestic resources from the government of Nigeria and in-country donors, foundations and the private sector.


133

Terms of Reference – Operations Management Team

The Programme Management Team (PMT) comprises of all UN agencies' programme

heads and is chaired by a UNCT Member appointed by the UNCT.

The Operations Management Team (OMT) comprises of key operations technical staff from

resident agencies and with support from UN Common Services. The chairperson of the

OMT shall be appointed by the UNCT, and shall attend UNCT meetings.

Mandate and purpose

The Delivering as One initiative presents the optimal opportunity to pursue the

harmonization and simplification of business practices, among participating UN agencies,

as well as between the UN and the Government. The OMT provides guidance,

recommendations and management support to the UN Country Team (UNCT) on

operational matters.


Ÿ The OMT will lead the implementation of the business-efficiency model for effective

delivery of the UNDAF/P, implementation of HACT, as well as lead the planned move

from Common Premises to One Office.

Ÿ Identify, assess and plan the activities of the OMT on an annual basis. The work

planning process will include the identification of relevant operational activities,

submission of recommendations to the UNCT and implementation of interventions,

such as those related to common premises and common services.

Ÿ Manage the implementation of the approved Work Plan throughout the year. These

activities will be undertaken in an open and transparent manner with broad Agency

participation.

Ÿ The OMT, under the guidance of the UNCT, will deepen the excellent UN House

experience focusing on measurable efficiency that translates to actual cost-savings

for the UN family, partners and government.

Ÿ The OMT will leverage the common premises experience in selected states where

the model is programmatically desirable and financially feasible during the UNDAF/P

cycle.

Ÿ Submit to the UNCT on a monthly/quarterly basis an updated progress report on the

status of the annual work plan.


The OMT will meet on a monthly basis, and may hold extra-ordinary meeting as and when

needed.


134

Terms of Reference – UN Communication Group

The UNCG comprises of communication experts and focal persons within UN agencies

under the leadership of the designated UNCT Chair and/or the UN Information Center

(UNIC).

Mandate and purpose

The UN Communications Group (UNCG) is responsible for ensuring a cohesive and

integrated approach to communications in the context of UN Reform and particularly

supports the One Voice coherence workstream. The UNCG will be responsible for the

entire communication architecture of the UAP interfacing with UN staff, PMT, UNCT and

UNDAF IPs.


Ÿ Promote a coherent image of the UN; advocating for the DaO concept collectively or

individually, on behalf of the Resident Coordinator's Office (RCO)

Ÿ Develop a common UN Communication and Advocacy Strategy working in close

collaboration with the Resident Coordinator's Office and UN Country Team (UNCT).

Ÿ The strategy should be reviewed by the UNCG and UNCT on an annual basis.

Ÿ Establish a work plan on the basis of the Communication and Advocacy Strategy,

including activities such as regular meetings, press releases, calendar of media &

public events, field missions for media, radio & TV programmes, electronic

newsletter, UN System Information Kit, website, common observances of important

international days and special occasions & reporting.

Ÿ Share information on agency-specific initiatives, discuss UN-wide strategies and

coordinate the implementation of joint communication activities.

Ÿ Identify and implement new and creative mechanisms to communicate to staff and

external stakeholders the ways in which the UN in Nigeria is Delivering as One.

Ÿ Undertake periodic environmental scanning and provides advice and

recommendations to the UNCT on strategic policy and operational issues.

Ÿ Strengthen inter-Agency cooperation and coordination of the United Nations in

Nigeria through improved communication and increase the visibility profile of UN in

the country.

Ÿ Develop targeted products to promote the UNDAF/P and its results.

Working arrangement

The UNCG will meet on a monthly basis, and may hold extra-ordinary meeting as and when

needed. The UNCG will report to the Resident Coordinator/UNCT through the Chair on all

UNCG activities on a quarterly basis. The approved report will be forwarded to the UNCG

secretariat at UN Headquarters for onward dissemination and posting on the UNCG

website. UNIC and RCO will provide secretarial support to the UNCG and will monitor the

implementation of its workplan.


135

Terms of Reference – UN M&E Group

The UN M&E Group (formerly DMAG), is made up of technical monitoring and evaluation

experts and/or focal persons from UN agencies. The Chair is nominated by members and

endorsed by the PMT Chair/RC.

Mandate and Purpose

The Group is responsible for providing oversight and support for planning, monitoring and

evaluation of the UNDAF/P and reporting to the PMT/RCO.

Membership

All UN agencies participating in the UNDAF II shall nominate an focal person to be member.

In absence of such member, a financial contribution would be required to ensure that the

work is done as per the requirements.

Decision Making

The M&E group will make decisions by quorum and majority. Decision of the M&E group

shall be duly recorded.

Roles and Responsibilities of the Group

Ÿ Provide oversight and technical support for planning, monitoring and evaluation of

the UNDAF/P including guidance on indicator selection and revision; and sharing

best practices and tools

Ÿ Develop the required tools, templates, format and instruments for data collection,

reporting of results.

Ÿ Develop and conduct joint M&E activities, including quality assurance, situation

monitoring and analysis performance, monitoring and development of online tools

for tracking and knowledge management.

Ÿ Support the Theme Groups to Plan, Monitor, Track and Report on activities,

progress and contributions to outcomes and outputs

Ÿ Working closely with the RCO, the Group will coordinate the processes of UNDAF

annual reviews, preparation of progress reports, management of Devinfo and IMEP

implementation, all of which will be linked to the national M&E system at the NPC.

Ÿ Review the UNDAF M&E Calendar on a regular basis.

Ÿ Support the UNCT and SC in the evaluation of UNDAF/P and advise on the

appropriate M&E system

Ÿ Work with other M&E groups in Delivering as One pilot or self-starter countries to

share experiences and lessons learned

Working arrangements

The M&E Group will meet monthly or as often as necessary to carry out its responsibilities.

The chair of the Group will attend PMT meetings, and all members, when required, will

provide regular updates. The M&E Group activities will be funded by Agencies

contributions as per the work plan of the Group.


136

Terms of Reference – Result Area Leads and Theme groups

Four Result areas, Six UNDAP thematic groups and one cross-cutting group have been

established and synchronized with the overall lead agencies for the four main Results

Areas of the UNDAF III. The result area and theme group leads will be as approved by the

UNCT. Each Theme group will comprise of at least one representative from each Outcome

area.

Mandate and Purpose

These groups will ensure consistency, continuity and accountability for the delivery of the

UNDAF/P results. The UNDAF results lead agencies and the thematic groups are

responsible for monitoring the implementation of the UAP.


Ÿ The Lead agency/Theme group leads are responsible for coordinating and

reporting on the implementation progress of each Result area.

Ÿ Coordinate, intervene and support all activities on the policy and programmatic

levels related to designated areas.

Ÿ Support the mainstreaming of cross-cutting issues throughout programming for all

theme groups

Ÿ Promote dialogue and cooperation on general or specific issues and mobilize

agencies around particular advocacy events related to key gender and human

rights issues.

Ÿ To operationalize the working modalities of these groups, sub-task teams and

working groups would be established as and when necessary by the lead agencies.

Ÿ Oversee implementation for result and theme areas thereby holding individual UN

agencies accountable for contributions and commitments to the attainment of

specific strategic activities and results.

Ÿ Theme groups are to seamlessly interface with the national sector thematic

coordination mechanisms and/or the proposed Country Assistance Framework

national thematic groups and report to the UNCT through the results area leads and

Programme Management Team.

Ÿ Ensure effective and efficient coordination and harmonization of UN common

position under each thematic group and result area thereby presenting the UN as a

unified entity at national thematic group deliberations.


The Theme groups' leads may meet as often as necessary to carry out their responsibilities

(Minimum on a monthly basis). The chair of the Theme group will attend PMT meetings and

provides reports accordingly. Each meetings and request from this group will be officially

communicated on time to all relevant members.


137

The will support the RC and the UNCT in

managing the implementation of the UNDAF/P by coordinating with the thematic groups,

lead/co-lead agencies, resident and non-resident UN agencies, the entire UN coordination

mechanisms and with the NPC and other MDAs for effective and efficient linkages to deliver

the planned results.

The entry point of the UN system into the CAF will be through the SC and the relevant

thematic groups under the UNDAF/P. All programme activities will be implemented by

Government ministries, departments and agencies, NGOs, INGOs and UN agencies. In

close collaboration with the NPC, the RCO will also act as the secretariat for the UNDAF

Steering Committee.

Role of the RCO

Ÿ Convene meetings of the Steering Committee, according to the stipulated working

arrangements

Ÿ Make sure that the decisions taken by the Steering Committee are in accordance

with the regulatory requirements and frameworks and agreements of the

participating Agencies and agreements with government and additional

development partners.

Ÿ Ensure that the decisions taken by the Steering committee are duly recorded and

promptly communicated to the members of the Steering Committee, including

Participating Agencies, government and development partners and Non-Resident

Agencies.

Ÿ Monitor the implementation of the decisions of the steering Committee

Each meetings and request from this group will be officially communicated on time to all

relevant members.

Office of the Resident Coordinator (RCO)


138

Terms of Reference – State Partnership and Outcome Boards

The overarching goal of the UNDAF/P programmes is to help the States manage its

resources to achieve its economic and social development strategy. The programmes will

work together in support of States' own reform agenda. Political leadership and State

ownership of the programmes is critical. To deliver this, The Governor of States has to

establish (a) State-led Board and (b) an Outcome and Implementation Committee, which

will provide strategic oversight and direction.

1. A State Partnership Board will provide oversight and strategic direction across all

programmes, reporting back to the Governors of the State.

2. A State Outcome and Implementation committee will be in charge of results

management and programme components implementation.

State Partnership Board

There will be a State Partnership Board to provide strategic oversight to all programmes

and external support to State Governments, ensuring adherence to development plans.

Co-chaired by His Excellency, the Governors and His Excellency, the UN Resident

Coordinator, it shall have the following specific responsibilities:

Ÿ Resolve strategic and policy issues;

Ÿ Approve programme strategies, implementation plans and any deviation;

Ÿ Ensure that required resources are mobilized and committed towards achievement

of outcomes;

Ÿ Provide guidance and oversight for the work of the State Outcome Board

Ÿ Review and validate the report of the state outcomes board including the draft

AWPs and its mid and end year review and monitoring reports

Ÿ At the end of UNDAF/P cycle, evaluate achievements towards expected results.

Deliverables

Ÿ Signed and approved Annual Work Plans;

Ÿ Approved Annual progress Reports of the Annual Work Plans implementation;

Ÿ Evaluation Report of the UNDAF/P.

Membership of the State Partnership Board

Ÿ His Excellency, the Executive Governors of State (or his nominee) Chairman

Ÿ The UN Resident Coordinator, Co-Chairman

Ÿ The Country Representatives of the participating UN agencies in the states.

Ÿ Director General of the State Planning Commission and Relevant States MDAs

Ÿ Representatives of Civil Society Organisations (CSO), Development Partners

Secretariat

The Secretariat for the Board will be provided by the State Planning Commission.


139

Frequency of meetings

The Board is to meet at least 2 times a year: at mid-year to review progress and at year end

to review current year achievements and approve next year work plan.

Meeting minutes

The Secretariat will take minutes at every meeting of the Board. A record with action points

shall be submitted to His Excellency the Executive Governors of State and the State

Executive Council with copies to the Chairpersons of the State Outcomes Board and

Technical Implementation Committees as well as the Heads of collaborating UN agencies.

State Outcomes Board

The State Outcomes Board shall guide the planning, implementation, monitoring and

evaluation of the activities included in the joint Annual Work Plan. The State Outcome Board

is responsible for:

Ÿ Ensuring that the AWPs of the technical implementing committees are sound, and

based on Result-based management and Human Right Based Approach principles ;

Ÿ determining the allocation of cost-sharing fund envelope;

Ÿ organizing mid-term review of progress towards the AWPs;

Ÿ discussing and determine solutions on issues arising from the implementation of the

Annual Work;

Ÿ Approving the final drafts of the annual reports and annual work plans formal

submission to the State Partnership Board.

Specific Functions

Ÿ Provide oversight of the Development Cooperation Framework, as predicated on

the State Development Plan, and as indicated in progress against the Results

Framework.

Ÿ Coordinate development partner interventions in State

Ÿ Coordination of implementation Committees

Ÿ Lead the annual review of the Development Cooperation Framework

Ÿ Review the impact of risks that might undermine progress and take corrective/

mitigating action.

Ÿ Lead HACT implementation process, etc in the States.

Deliverables

Ÿ The State Outcome Board will deliver comprehensive mid-year review reports.

Ÿ These reports shall include support and direction to the relevant Technical

Committee responsible for delivery on the Results Framework.

Ÿ The State Outcome Board will also be responsible to provide to the State

Partnership Board recommended actions that the State Partnership Board needs to

take in delivering against the Results Framework.


140

Membership of the State Outcome Board

Ÿ The DG State Planning Commission - Chairman

Ÿ Relevant State MDAs

Ÿ UN state and Federal Program officers

Ÿ Representatives of Civil Society Organizations (CSO)

Reporting

The State Outcome Board shall report to the State Partnership Board.

Secretariat

The Secretariat for the State Outcomes Board will be provided by the State Planning

Commission, of the State.

Frequency of meetings

The State Outcome Board shall meet at least 3 times a year. The third meeting of the year

shall also serve as the review/planning meeting.

Outcome Manager

The Outcome Manager shall be the Permanent Secretary, State Planning Commission.

Responsibilities include the following:

Ÿ Ensure that continuous dialogue is maintained through personal contact with the UN

lead agency to ensure quality assurance and monitoring and evaluation of AWPs;

Ÿ Ensure that support and directions from outcome board are duly implemented by

relevant technical committees;

Ÿ Provide advisory support to persons and institutions involved in programme

implementation, monitoring and evaluation, as well as other processes and

procedures that will ensure achievement of results;

Ÿ Ensure that HACT is properly implemented;

Ÿ Ensure accountability for/and judicious use of programme resources, as well as

follow up on audit issues;

Ÿ Keep abreast of relevant UN Agencies/UNDAF policies and procedures, as well as

participate in capacity building activities for managing developments in the states

and provide support for the training of relevant programme personnel and officials

on UNDAF policies and procedures.


141

Annex 4: UNDAF III Four-Year Integrated Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (2014-2017)

ACTIVITIES 2014 2015 2016 2017

Decision-making

Events

•

MDGs Summit (NY)

Mid-Term Review

End of Cycle Review

Evaluations

Evaluation of UNDAF III ‘s

adherence to aid

effectiveness principles and

its impact on quality,

relevance, effectiveness of

Nigeria-UN collaboration

Assessment of the impact of

UNDAF III

in improving Nigeria’s

institutional, systemic, and

human resource capacities in

good governance, social capital

development, equitable growth and

human security.

Studies and Surveys

•

DHS 2013 finalized

•

Survey on status of women in Nigeria

• HIV sentinel survey • Corruption risk assessment in

MDG-related sectors (ongoing 2013-2017) •

Global Program on Reproductive Health Commodity Security (GPRHCS) Survey

•

MICS

•

[TO BE FINALIZED IN COLLABORAION WITH GON]

• Global Program on Reproductive Health Commodity Security (GPRHCS) Survey

•

Population Census

•



•

DHS

•

[TO BE FINALIZED IN COLLABORATION WITH GON]


M&E Tools &

Systems

development

•

DevInfo decentralization

•

Phase

II development of DAD

•

Development of DHIS 2.O in supported states and LGAs

•


•

Development of DHIS 2.O in supported states and LGAs

•


•


M&E Capacity

Building

•

M&E Training

•

DevInfo Training at state level

•

Training on the use of DAD at state level

•

Training on the use of NHMIS tools and the Software (DHIS 2.0) for data management at the state and

•


•


•


LGA levels

Relevant M&E [TO BE FINALIZED IN [TO BE FINALIZED IN [TO BE FINALIZED IN [TO BE FINALIZED IN

activities of other

partners

•

COLLABORAION WITH DPs]•

COLLABORAION WITH DPs]

•

COLLABORAION WITH DPs]•

COLLABORAION WITH DPs]

Publications • MDG Report• Status of RHCS in Nigeria

• • Status of RHCS in Nigeria •


142

Annex 5: UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation Calendar

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

UN

CT

Mo

nit

ori

ng

an

d E

va

lua

tio

n A

cti

vit

ies

Monitoring

Conduct Joint field

visits with partners

Report progress of

UNDAF Programme

implementation and

expenditures in

Annual Workplan

(AWPs)

Conduct Joint field

visits with Partners

Report progress of

UNDAF Programme

implementation and

expenditures in

AWPs

Conduct Joint field


Report progress of

UNDAF Programme

implementation and

expenditures in

AWPs

Conduct Joint field


Report progress of

UNDAF Programme

implementation and

expenditures in

AWPs

Reviews

Joint Annual

Programme/ UNDAF

Annual Reviews

Joint programmes

reviews

Joint Annual

Programme/ UNDAF

Annual Reviews

Joint programmes

reviews

Joint Annual

Programme/ UNDAF

Annual Reviews

Joint programmes

reviews

Joint Annual

Programme/ UNDAF

Annual Reviews

Joint programmes

reviews


143

One Fund

allocation

iv. Conclusions and recommendations (max. 2 pages)

. Global appreciation of the UN intervention

. Best practices, challenges and lessons learnt

ANNUAL EXPENDITURES

. Recommendations for the next year

ANNEX 6: Format of UNDAF/P Annual Review report

i. Introduction (max. 0.5 page)

ii. Main annual achievements around per UNDAF outcome (max. 3-4 pages in total)

. Highlights per outcome

. Special consideration to crosscutting issues

iii. Resources mobilization and use of funds (max. 1 page)

. Overview table on mobilized and spent resources per outcome and in total

. Brief analysis about the funding situation of the UNDAF Action Plan

V. ANNEX: Consolidated Reporting matrix

OUTPUT

OUTPUT

INDICATORS AND

and annual

targets

ACHIEVEMENTS (based on output

indicators)

PROGRESS towards out

outcome

core/

regular/

assessed

Other/

extra-

budgetary

RESPONSI

BLE PARTY

(UN

agency)

Total Expenditures

Output 1

Output 2


144

Vision: Nigeria vision 20:2020 economic transformation blueprint for stimulating

Nigeria’s economic growth and launching the country onto a path of sustained and rapid social economic development

Strategic Intent 2. Social Capital Development

By 2020, Nigerians are

healthy, knowledgeable, highly skilled and productive people, with positive value

orientations, living in an inclusive and cohesive

society; free from all forms of discrimination, violence and abuse; irrespective of sex,

age, geographic location, and socio-economic status; and

forming a globally competitive workforce.

Strategic Intent 3. Equitable and Sust. Economic Growth

By 2020, Nigeria attains a

strong, diversified, sustainable and equitable economy driven by robust investment in human capital and infrastructure that stimulate primary production for efficient and value-adding secondary production for an unrestricted, expanded, and globally competitive trade;

supported by an employment environment that is youth-

inclusive, gender-sensitive with enhanced capacity.

Strategic Intent 1. Good Governance

By 2020 Nigeria enjoys a just, democratic, stable society, with accountable governance and increased

transparency, through trusted, regulated, transparent, participatory electoral processes and high institutional performance, governed by the Rule of Law, consisting of Legislative processes

compliant with international standards, a responsive Executive, and an independent and accessible justice system, which are effectively

coordinated, with Human Rights & Gender Equality institutions effectively monitoring, reporting and redressing violations especially among the most

marginalized, and people claiming their rights

Strategic Intent 4. Human Security and Risk Management

By 2020 Nigeria is on a peaceful, secure and

sustainable development path where disaster, environmental, climate and conflict risks and threats

are mitigated by policies, laws and plans that are participatory, gender responsive, funded, monitored

and enforced systematically at all levels of the federation with high levels of political will; relevant government institutions respond timely, effectively, efficiently and are well coordinated (vertically and

horizontally) in effective partnership with empowered civil society and utilize evidence-based early warning systems; and where the population is rights-assertive

and increasingly resilient through awareness and ability to participate in mitigation and response to

threats, crises and change

Outcome 1.1. Rule of law/Accountability

Outcome 1.2.Democratic processes

Outcome 1.3.Human Rights and Gender

equality

Outcome 1.4.Decentralization

Outcome 1.5.Evidence-based, human rights and gender sensitive decision-

making

Outcome 2.1.Education

Outcome.4.1.Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and

emergency response

Outcome 4.2.Conflict prevention and management

Outcome 4.3.Protection of the environment

Outcome 4.4.Migration, ilicit drugs and crime

management

Outcome 2.2.Health/WASH/Nutrition

Outcome 2.3.HIV and AIDS

Outcome 2.4.Social Protection

Outcome 3.1.Investment climate

Outcome 3.2.Energy

Outcome 3.3.Production

Outcome 3.4.Trade

Outcome 3.5.Employment

UNDAF Outcomes

Overview


145

Strategic Intent 1. By 2020 Nigeria enjoys a just, democratic, stable society, with accountable governance and increased transparency, through trusted, regulated, participatory electoral processes and high

institutional performance, governed by the Rule of Law, consisting of Legislative processes compliant with international standards, an responsive Executive, and an independent and accessible justice system, which

are effectively coordinated, with Human Rights & Gender Equality institutions effectively monitoring, reporting and redressing violations especially among the most marginalized, and people claiming their rights

1.2. DemocracyNigeria’s democracy is

deepened through inclusive Electoral processes with

independent and transparent regulatory mechanisms,

democratic political parties, and active and equitable citizens’ participation and women’s

empowerment holding elected officials to account, by 2017.

1.3. Human RightsHuman Rights of Nigerians and

Gender Equality are promoted and protected through reliable and

timely monitoring and reporting mechanisms at Federal, State and

LGA level, effective gender-responsive and age-appropriate

redress measures, in an environment compliant with

international standards, by 2017.

1.1. Accountability/Rules of lawStrengthened accountability and respect for the Rule of law, compliant with international

standards and human rights, provide inclusive, age- and gender-responsive,

equitable access to Justice, with strengthened and coordinated institutions

ensuring enhanced integrity through transparency, strengthened preventive and

regulatory policies and frameworks and engaged civil society and media, by 2017

1.4.DecentralizationBy 2017, Local Governance is strengthened

through increased deconcentration and decentralisation of powers and resources and improved coordination between and

among the different levels of government for strengthened accountability and effective

service delivery, through improved technical and institutional capacity, and inclusive

participation and engagement of citizens, communities, civil society and private sector.

Output 1.1.1. Capacity at Federal and State level for

coordination, law reforms and service delivery for Justice Sector institutions to provide inclusive,

age- and gender-responsive, equitable and timely access to Justice, and for anti-corruption

institutions to prevent and regulate corruption, is

strengthened.

Output 1.2.1 Election management bodies’ (especially Independent

National Electoral Commission) capacity strengthened in strategic planning,

policy formulation and administration of elections

Output 1.3.1 National institutional

capacity is strengthened for prevention, protection, reliable and timely monitoring and reporting and

gender-responsive and age-appropriate redress of human rights

violations (National Human Rights Commission, CSOs, Media, Justice

Sector).

Output 1.1.2 Capacity of CSOs, including their internal

governance mechanisms, and constructive dialogue between

Civil society organisations, media, other stakeholders and

government is strengthened to enable civil society to monitor the budgetary and judicial processes, anti-corruption institutions, and

can play their watchdog role.

Output 1.2.2 Political parties have strengthened platforms and

mechanisms (IPAC, INEC, Civil Society) to promote human rights, women’s

participation, respect for non-violence and democratic processes and their

implications for democratic development.

Output 1.2.3 CSOs, traditional leaders, women’s groups and other

key stakeholders are able to conduct civic education and advocacy for

affirmative action to increase women’s participation in politics and the

electoral process.

Output 1.3.2. Capacity for legislative and regulatory reform at

Federal and State level in compliance with international norms and

standards and Nigeria’s commitments to human rights and

gender equality is strengthened

Output 1.3.3. A strong public, civil society, communities and media are empowered to advocate for, report

and demand greater state promotion, respect, and protection

of human rights

Public Decision makingBy 2017, public decision-

making for equitable, gender-responsive and evidence-based

planning, budgeting, implementation, monitoring

and evaluation are effectively coordinated and driven by

quality, timely, harmonised, disaggregated data, at Federal,

State, and local levels.

Output 1.5.1. National and State Planning institutions

have strengthened capacity for coordination, evidence-

based and gender-responsive planning, budgeting,

reporting, monitoring, and evaluation on VISION

20:2020, other national priorities and related UNDAF-

supported priorities.

Output 1.5.2. Statistical agencies, line MDAs and research institutions are better able to generate, analyse and use quality,

timely disaggregated data and make it accessible for

evidence-based decision-making and programming

Output 1.4.1. Replicable Model of Local Governance in place for evidence-

based advocacy to influence decentralization and deconcentration of

power and resources in an inclusive manner to the local government and

communities.

Output 1.4.2. Strengthened accountability mechanisms at local and

community levels on development priorities for promoting inclusive equitable and gender responsive participatory planning, budgetary

processes and monitoring and evaluation

Output 1.4.3 Improved institutional capacity of local government and urban

governance to coordinate, plan, generate resources, implement and

monitor, for equitable delivery of services.

Result Area 1

Good Governance


146

Strategic Intent 2. By 2020, Nigerians are healthy, knowledgeable, highly skilled and productive people, with positive value orientations, living in an inclusive and cohesive society; free from all forms of discrimination, violence and abuse; irrespective

of sex, age, geographic location, and socio-economic status; and forming a globally competitive workforce..

Outcome 2.2. HealthBy 2017, Health related MDGs achieved and sustained through strong and well coordinated Health systems

implementing innovative, high impact and cost effective, equitable, gender responsive interventions inclusive of

foundational determinants of health at community, LGA states and Federal levels with active engagement of right

holders; informed by South-South cooperation and evidence based learning

Outcome 2.3. HIV and AIDSBy 2017, HIV transmission reduced in all key

populations (particularly women, children and young people) , MTCT eliminated, condition of people living with HIV improved, through the implementation of effective innovative HIV prevention and mitigation

policies, strategies, strong multi-sectoral partnerships and coordination; and active involvement of

stakeholders at all levels.

Outcome 2.1 EducationBy 2017, Nigeria’s formal and non-formal education system produces an increased number of graduates with relevant

functional, technical, and vocational market driven knowledge and skills; through quality education; informed

by evidence, equity based, gender-sensitive, innovative policies, plans, systems and programmes at Federal, State, LGA and Community levels, supported by adequate funding

at each level.

Outcome 2.4. Social ProtectionBy 2017, inequities in the Nigerian society are reduced;

driven by well informed and committed leadership; through innovative, inclusive, well-coordinated and

evidence-based national social protection framework; enabled by context-specific, rights-based, age-

appropriate, gender-sensitive policies which empower and protect the most vulnerable and at risk populations

Output 2.1.1. Advocacy,

programming and budgeting capacities of Federal, State and LGA Education

stakeholders strengthened to design, cost, mobilize resources, coordinate,

monitor and document evidence-based, equity focused, gender responsive

education sector policies, strategic and operational plans, programmes and

innovative models.

Output 2.1.2. Enhanced capacity at

Federal, State and LGA levels for implementation of education sector

strategic and operational plans to increase enrolment and retention of school-aged children (including Early

Childhood), and illiterate adults, especially girls, women and other

vulnerable groups, through awareness creation, stimulation of demand,

advocacy for enhanced infrastructure and staffing management, and

development and use of models for increasing access and affordability

Output 2.1.3. Capacity of MDAs and

CSOs at all levels strengthened for child/learner-centred, interactive teaching

and quality assurance, to enhance learning, increased transition,

functionality and labour market relevance of knowledge and skills

acquired, and overall child/girl-friendly schooling environment.

Output 2.2.1. Public agencies and Civil Society Organizations at federal,

state, and LGA levels are able to implement updated, harmonized, evidence based, gender responsive policies and plans to facilitate equitable access to

quality water supply and sanitation services and the practice of good hygiene by vulnerable populations and institutions based on innovative

communication for development and coordination systems

Output 2.2.2. Capacities of government and partners at all levels

including inter-sectoral linkage and coordination are strengthened to implement high impact, equitable, gender responsive and innovative nutrition and food security interventions, enhance nutrition friendly

agricultural productivity especially at household level and promote crop and livestock diversification to improve nutrition outcomes (reduced stunting,

acute malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies rates) amongst most vulnerable groups especially children and women

Output 2.2.3. Capacities of public and private health institutions

including Civil Society Organizations at all levels strengthened to deliver accessible, equitable, quality, gender-responsive, evidence-based and,

adequately funded, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health interventions inclusive of sexual and reproductive health; using innovations

and appropriate technology (including new vaccines and ICT) and responding to increased demand and use of preventive, curative and promotive health services by empowered and involved communities;

supported by enhanced Health Management Information System.

Output 2.2.4. Capacities of Federal, State, LGAs, Civil Society

Organizations, Academia, and private sector are strengthened to plan, update and implement relevant standards and guidelines for

Communicable and Non Communicable Disease services utilizing innovative technologies; informed by gender responsive policies, funded and

disseminated research, with application of communication strategies to increase awareness and demand; enhance disease surveillance and ensure

timely response to outbreaks.

Output 2.3.1. National coordination mechanisms and partnerships strengthened

to promote an equitable enabling environment for PLHIV, implement

innovative policies and plans and establish logistic management systems through

enhanced leadership capacity

Output 2.3.2. The capacity of institutions strengthened for increased Behavior Change Communication and demand

creation for HIV prevention, treatment, care and support services in the general

population in an equitable manner

Output 2.3.3. Increased capacity at Federal state and LGA level for

coordination, integration and delivery of quality eMTCT services, promotion of

community involvement and data collection and management systems

Output 2.3.4. Increased capacity of key

institutions for equitable delivery of combination prevention interventions for adolescents and young people, especially the most at risk and

those living with HIV, through inclusive strategic partnerships and coordination platforms that

support innovative knowledge management and demand creation

Output 2.3.1 Gender disaggregated strategic knowledge generated and required

tools and mechanisms put in place to inform innovative, equitable HIV

programming

Output 2.4.1 Age-appropriate and

Gender-sensitive, fiscally sustainable National social protection policy and

framework developed based on context-specific, innovative, replicable and

evidence-based models.tle

Output 2.4.2 Capacities of public and community institutions, including CSOs

are enhanced to design, implement, coordinate, monitor and evaluate social

protection mechanisms at all levels; translating to increased utilization of

accessible and affordable essential social services for targeted populations.

Output 2.4.3 Decision-making capacities for Social Welfare systems are

strengthened at all levels through evidence based advocacy and learning, including South-south cooperation; to

endorse, mobilize and commit resources to equitable, gender responsive and

coordinated social protection mechanisms.

Output 2.4.4 Formal and non-formal social engagement systems and networks in identified groups and communities are

able to participate in equitable and sustainable social development through development and utilization of evidence-

based social communication tools, channels and mechanisms

Result Area 2

Social Capital Development


147

Strategic Intent 3. By 2020, Nigeria attains a strong, diversified, sustainable and equitable economy driven by robust

investment in human capital and infrastructure that stimulate primary production for efficient and value-adding secondary production for an unrestricted, expanded, and globally competitive trade; supported by an employment

environment that is youth-inclusive, gender-sensitive with enhanced capacity.

3.3. ProductionNigeria’s productive system is

value-chain driven, productivity enhancing, sectorally-linked and

inclusive, based on green and relevant technology, supported by

robust private sector-friendly investment policies that provide

gender-friendly opportunities and promote rural economic development by 2017.

3.4. TradeBy 2017, Nigeria’s domestic and

foreign trade is expanded, diversified, globally competitive and

based on international best practices, norms and conventions;

deriving from conducive and evidence-based policies and strong

capacity, resulting in improved terms of trade with significant increase in foreign exchange

earnings and GDP

3.2. EnergyBy 2017, Nigeria’s economic growth is

driven by increased and diversified use of renewable energy sources, that promote technology transfer and local

capacity building; characterized by affordable and equitable access for

domestic and productive uses; supported by effective advocacy,

efficient regulatory mechanisms and evidence based policies

3.5. EmploymentBy 2017, Nigeria’s

employment opportunities are expanded, driven by

pro-poor, gender -responsive and youth-

inclusive policies supported by skills-driven, competent

capacities based on reliable, available and disaggregated data.

3.1. Investment climateBy 2017, Nigeria has a favourable,

equitable and gender-sensitive investment climate that enhances the ease of doing business as a basis for increased and sustainable domestic

investments and capital inflows; anchored on conducive, enabling and

evidence based policies; and strengthened institutions that

operate based on international best practices, norms and standards.

Output 3.1.1.A national, sectorally-linked

and inclusive investment policy developed with

implementation plan and coordination mechanism across Federal and state

levels put in place; administered by

strengthened Federal and State Ministries,

Departments and agencies (MDAs); for enhanced ease of doing business and increased

domestic investment and capital inflow and increased

employment generation.

Output 3.1.2.Institutional and human capacities of investment related Federal and state

ministries, Departments and Agencies, CSOs and relevant private sector stakeholders

strengthened, through technological and knowledge

acquisition to deliver high standard and equitable

service, monitor and regulate compliance and provide

investment support services.

Output 3.4.1. National Trade policy endorsed,

with implementation plan developed and adopted, and

coordination mechanism put in place to deepen and diversify

domestic and foreign trade, and facilitate Nigeria’s trade

relations with other countries; stimulate production and

enhance inter-sectoral linkages and trade opportunities.

Output 3.3.2. Entrepreneurial skills of small and medium scale producers to grow into commercial enterprises

strengthened through innovative and adaptive models of technology acquisition, transfer and diffusion of green

technologies that increase productivity, reduce cost of production, provides more job opportunities especially

to youth and women.

Output 3.3.3. Strategies for enhanced valued added production developed, implementation plan,

coordination mechanism and framework for integrating inputs suppliers, producers, processors and marketers

established; leading to economic diversification, increased job opportunities, enhanced income and poverty reduction, especially for women and youth.

Output 3.3.4. Human and institutional capacities of relevant government agencies, and private sector institutions, of the

productive subsectors of the economy built to enhance productivity at primary and secondary levels through strengthened Vocational, Business and Entrepreneurship acquisition and training centers, extension agencies to

provide equitable and gender responsive opportunities for economic growth.

Output 3.4.2. Relevant Trade and Investment MDAs are able to develop and monitor the implementation of

trade policy that boost domestic trade and promote

international trade; MDAs and other trade related institutions

are able to promote and negotiate trade with partners

through strengthened capacity in line with international best

practices; trade capacity building and quality

infrastructure; to expand, diversify and enhance global

competitiveness.

Output 3.5.1. A national employment policy that promotes labour–based technologies with high

employment multiplier and decent jobs put in place;

leading to the broadening of the productive base and

expansion of employment opportunities; accompanied by implementation plan and

coordination mechanism developed and endorsed at

federal level and systematically adopted at

state and LGAs levels.

Output 3.5.2. Human and institutional capacities of

relevant Federal and State MDAs, workers and private

sector organizations strengthened to develop,

coordinate and monitor the implementation of pro-poor,

gender-responsive, youth-inclusive and evidence-based employment policy; support

the development of entrepreneurial vocational and

ICT skills.

Output 3.3.1. National Policies and strategies for strengthening

productivity and enterprise development that is gender-responsive and youth-inclusive endorsed and

monitored; with implementation framework put in place and operationalized at the federal and state levels for increased job opportunities, income, wealth creation

and poverty reduction.

Output 3.2.1.Energy supply diversification strategies and practices to promote the use of renewable

energy sources strengthened and integrated into the national energy policy through support

to the energy -related MDAs to ensure equitable and affordable access for productive and

domestic uses.

Output 3.2.2.South-South Cooperation strengthened to

expand the adoption and use of green technologies for the promotion and use of

renewable energy sources such as hydropower, biomass, solar and wind; local equipment

manufacturing reducing cost of energy to end users.

Output 3.2.3..Capacity of the national energy institutions and

the private sector operators strengthened to develop, coordinate and monitor energy policy

implementation, develop framework to enhance equitable access and manufacturing of low cost

renewable energy equipments, and develop requisite skills and know-how to promote

energy efficiency in domestic and industrial use.

Result Area 3

Equitable and Sustainable Economic Growth


148

Strategic Intent 4. By 2020 Nigeria is on a peaceful, secure and sustainable development path where disaster, environmental,

climate and conflict risks and threats are mitigated by policies, laws and plans that are participatory, gender responsive, funded, monitored and enforced systematically at all levels of the federation with high levels of political will; relevant government institutions respond timely, effectively, efficiently and are well coordinated (vertically and horizontally) in effective partnership with empowered civil society and utilize evidence-based early warning systems; and where the population is rights-assertive and increasingly resilient through awareness and ability to participate in mitigation and

response to threats, crises and change..

4.2. Conflict Prevention & ManagementBy 2017 the occurrence and effects of

conflicts and violence are reduced through institutionalized and coordinated prevention and management by the establishment of a peace architecture supporting negotiated solutions at federal, state and community

level in partnership with civil society, informed by gender sensitive conflict analysis

and other evidence based EWEA methodologies, and tolerant, peace-loving

and resilient communities

4.3. Protection of the Environment By 2017 Nigeria’s environmental vulnerability

to negative effects of economic activities, urbanization and climate change is reduced

through the efficient use of natural resources, a reformed regulatory framework aligned with

Nigeria’s international commitments, enforced at Federal, State and local levels by strengthened institutions, private sector and

population that are environmentally conscious and taking action towards environmental

sustainability.

4.1. DRR & Emergency Response By 2017, the effects of disasters and

emergencies on the population in emergency prone areas are reduced

through an effectively regulated framework for prevention, preparedness and timely

response; by coordinated and capacitated institutions at federal, state and local levels in partnership with civil society, informed

by equity and gender considerations and an evidence based EWEA system; and resilient

communities.

4.4. Migration & Crime ManagementBy 2017 migration is harnessed for

development through effective management and threats of irregular migration, illicit drugs, crime and unregulated internal migration on

Human security are reduced through strengthened law enforcement, border management and reformed regulatory

framework for prevention and response that are coordinated by capacitated institutions in

partnership with media, civil society organizations, informed by evidence-based,

age- and gender sensitive approaches.

Output 4.1.1. The national legal and policy framework

for emergency coordination, risk reduction and response is strengthened

in conformity with international standards and systematically cascaded

at state level

Output 4.2.1 National peace architecture established through advocacy and strengthened to

systematically and institutionally promote tolerance, a culture of peace,

dialogue and support negotiated solutions in order to prevent, mitigate

and respond timely to conflict and violence disturbing life, especially of the

most vulnerable Output 4.1.2 An improved and integrated EW/EA

system covering the three tiers of the Federation that produces timely and

actionable gender disaggregated, equity sensitive information, direction and

advice for decision makers, agencies, CSOs and communities.

Output 4.1.3. Strengthened institutional capacity to

coordinate, prepare for and respond to emergencies and to enhance coping capacity of communities (including

safety nets)

Output 4.2.2 An improved and integrated conflict

EW/EA system covering the three tiers of the Federation that produces timely and actionable gender disaggregated,

equity-sensitive conflict analysis, strategic directions including do no harm alternatives, and guidance for decision makers, agencies, CSOs and

communities

Output 4.3.1 A comprehensive national regulatory framework is

developed in line with ratified international protocols and its implementation supported for the sustainable management of Nigeria’s natural resources including land, water, air, oil, biodiversity, natural habitats and

extractive industries.

Output 4.4.1 The national legal and policy

framework for migration, drug-related and organized crime

management is strengthened and reformed through laws and

policies that are evidence-based, inclusive, age- and gender-

responsive.Output 4.3.2 Environmental institutions at Federal, state and LGA levels are capable to implement policies and enforce

laws, through multi stakeholders solutions harnessing indigenous knowledge, innovations and

practices for environmental management

Output 4.3.3 Partnership developed and capacities of

Government, Civil Society and Private sector enhanced to promote a culture of environmental

awareness, knowledge and commitment for individual and collective action by youth,

entrepreneurs, civil and religious leaders and decision makers.

Output 4.4.2 Institutional capacities for managing

internal migration, harnessing Diaspora for development,

prevention of and response to irregular migration and

management of regular migration as well as drugs-related and organized

crime are strengthened through improved law enforcement and

enhanced coordination, data management and border

administration and control

Result Area 4

Human Security & Risk Management


149