unitarity constraints in the sm with a singlet scalar
DESCRIPTION
Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar. 2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS Ju b in Park collaborated with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang, and based on arXiv:1306.6713 [ hep-ph ]. Contents. Motivation Model How to derive the unitarity condition ? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 1
Unitarity Constraints in the SM
with a singlet scalar2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS
Jubin Parkcollaborated with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang,
and based on arXiv:1306.6713 [hep-ph]
![Page 2: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 2
Contents1. Motivation
2. Model
3. How to derive the unitarity condition ?
4. Unitarity of S-matrix and Numerical Results : 4.1 <S> ≠ 0 case 4.2 <S> = 0 case
5. Implications : 5.1 Unitarized Higgs inflation
5.2 TeV scale singlet dark matter
![Page 3: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 3
1. MotivationWhy a (singlet) scalar field ?
1. A new discovery of a scalar particle at LHC.
Higg particle in the SM ~ 124 ~ 126 GeV
??2. can modify the production and/or decay rates of the Higgs field.
B. Batell, D. McKeen and M. Pospelov, JHEP 1210, 104 (2012) [arXiv:1207.6252 [hep-ph]].S. Baek, P. Ko, W. -I. Park and E. Senaha, arXiv:1209.4163 [hep-ph].
![Page 4: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 4
3. can supply a dark matter candidate by using a discrete Z_2 symmetryC. P. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, Nucl. Phys. B 619, 709 (2001) [hep-ph/0011335].E. Ponton and L. Randall, JHEP 0904, 080 (2009) [arXiv:0811.1029 [hep-ph]].
4. can give a solution of baryogenesis via the first of electroweak phase transi-tionS. Profumo, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy, JHEP 0708, 010 (2007)[arXiv:0705.2425 [hep-ph]].
5. can solve the unitarity problem of the Higgs inflation. G. F. Giudice and H. M. Lee, Phys. Lett. B 694, 294 (2011) [arXiv:1010.1417 [hep-ph]].
![Page 5: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 5
Higgs mass implications on the sta-bility of the electroweak vacuum
Joan Elias-Miroa, Jose R. Espinosaa;b, Gian F. Giudicec,Gino Isidoric;d, Antonio Riottoc;e, Alessandro Strumiaf arXiv:1112.3022v1 [hep-ph]
The RG running of Higgs quartic coupling can give a useful hint about the structure of given theory at the very short distance
![Page 6: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 6
Stabilization of the Electroweak Vacuum by a Scalar Threshold Effect
Joan Elias-Miro, Jose R. Espinosa, Gian F. Giudicec, Hyun Min Lee, Alessandro Strumia arXiv:1203.0237v1 [hep-ph]
The RG running of Higgs quartic coupling can give a useful hint about the structure of given theory at the very short distance
![Page 7: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 7
But, (my) real motivation isIn fact, we want to study 2HD + 1S case, where the potential is generated radia-tively.So we have to consider the unitarity condition in this case.
But, I could not find any paper about this. Note that there are many papers about 2HD. So, I decided to attack this problem, and I tried to find a more easy case such as 1HD(SM) + 1S.Frankly speaking I found one paper, but they just consider a limited case not a general case.After all, I tried to study the unitarity constraints of the 1HD(SM) + 1S case first.
![Page 8: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 8
2. ModelThe potential form is given by
★S is a singlet scalar and H is a Higgs particle in the SM.
![Page 9: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 9
2. 1. <S> ≠ 0 =η , v
Mixing angles
𝐶 β=𝑣 /√𝑣2+η2 𝑆β=η /√𝑣2+η2
𝒗
𝜼
𝜷
![Page 10: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 10
This is important !!!!
Three couplings can be rewritten in terms of physical masses, and
★
𝐶 β=𝑣 /√𝑣2+η2 𝑆β=η /√𝑣2+η2
![Page 11: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 11
★ Stability conditions ★
![Page 12: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 12
2. 2. <S> = 0 +
Imposing Z_2 symmetry, this case can give a Z_2 odd singlet scalar as a dark matter candidate.There is no bi-linear mixing term (~hs) in the potential.
![Page 13: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 13
3. How to derive the unitarity con-straints ?
![Page 14: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
① The scattering amplitude
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park
Spin J partial wave
Differential cross section
② Optical theorem
+Imaginary part
in the forward direction
![Page 15: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 15
③ Identity
+Finally,
Unitarity condition★
→
![Page 16: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 16
General form of amplitude (s)with vanishing external particle masses
Four point vertex Three point vertex.
s t u
![Page 17: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 17
4. Unitarity of S-matrix and Numerical Results
![Page 18: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 18
4. 1. <S> ≠ 0 s , → Three vertex parts of is negligible !!!
Only, four vertex part is important !!!
0 0
→𝑎0=
116𝜋 𝐴
![Page 19: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 19
Neutral states from >, >, >, >, >, >
A , B
For example,
Charged states just give the diagonal elements of ,which is equal to .
Note
![Page 20: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 20
Perturbative unitarity can be given in terms of eigenvalues of ,
|λ𝐻4𝜋 ×𝑐 𝑖|< 12eigenvalues of
_0𝑇
The maximal eigenvalue can give the most strong bound !!
Therefore,★
![Page 21: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 21
SM case >, >, >, >, >, >
(− λ𝐻4 𝜋 )(1 1
√81√8
0
1√8
34
14
0
1√8
14
34
0
0 0 0 12
)→SM limit
It is important to check the eigenvalue of →Therefore,★
![Page 22: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 22
𝑇 𝑆𝑀=(1 1
√81
√80
1√8
34
14
0
1√8
14
34
0
0 0 0 12
) →The maximal eigenvalue of is
|λ𝐻4𝜋 ×𝟑𝟐|<12
of eigenvalues of
→→
![Page 23: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 23
| λ𝐻4 𝜋 ×𝟑𝟐|< 12 and from =
TeVLee-Quigg-Thacker bound
![Page 24: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 24
Again, we go back to 2. 1. <S> ≠ 0 s ,
As we check the characteristic equation of , we get this equa-tion,
with two trivial eigenvalues and of , where A and B are given by A , B .
![Page 25: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 25
Also, from the eigenvalue of
|λ𝐻4𝜋 ×𝑐 𝑖|< 12 →This bound on the coupling is translated into the bound on the mass given by,
![Page 26: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 26
Now let us find the eigenvalues,
→
A , B
First, we fix and check the allowed regions from the stability condi-tions,
![Page 27: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 27
Allowed regions from unit. and stab. Unitarity
Stabilityλ𝑯𝑺≈𝟗 .𝟖 λ𝑯𝑺=1
λ𝑯𝑺=5
λ𝑯𝑺=9.8
λ𝑯𝑺=0
![Page 28: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 28
After all, we get the contour plots
λ𝑯𝑺 0 λ𝑯𝑺 9.8
Allowed region
Allowed region
![Page 29: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 29
From the maximum eigenvalue 3 of
126 GeV
|𝑎0|<12 |𝑎0|<
12|𝑎0|<1
|𝑎0|<1
![Page 30: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 30
Neutral states from
4. 1. <S> ≠ 0 , >, >, >, >, >, >
matrix is written by where,
![Page 31: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 31
Explicit form of scattering ampli-tudes
![Page 32: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 32
The contour plots
λ𝑯𝑺 0 λ𝑯𝑺 9.8
![Page 33: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 33
4. 2. <S> = 0 ,limit Note
matrix is written by >, >, >, >, >, >
00
00 → 2. 2. <S> 0 case
,limit
① No coupling !② The odd parity of s forbids following processes :→ , →
34 𝐵
![Page 34: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 34
But because of no mixing between and ,we can not constrain the mass bound of .
and →The unitarity condition gives
𝑚h≤1√2
𝑀𝐿𝑄𝑇
![Page 35: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 35
4. 2. <S> ≠ 0 s ,
The characteristic equa-tion is
with one trivial eigenvalue of .
![Page 36: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 36
The contour plots
NoteThe maximal eigenvalue of is → →
𝑚h≤√2𝑀𝐿𝑄𝑇
![Page 37: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 37
Let us summarize our results for a while.
![Page 38: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 38
5. Implications5.1 Unitarized Higgs inflation
Potential :
From unitarity :
![Page 39: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 39
Imposing the COBE result for normalization of the power spectrum, →
→GeV
![Page 40: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 40
Mixing angle vs Mass of singlet scalar s
Allowed region
GeV↑
NoteVery small mixing allowed
![Page 41: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 41
5.2 TeV scale singlet dark matter
Dominant annihilation channel :When TeV
Relic density :
Ω𝐷𝑀 h2=0.1138 ±0.0045From the 9-year WMAP result:
![Page 42: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 42
vs Ω𝐷𝑀 h
2=0.1138 ±0.0045Unitarity
TeV★
![Page 43: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 43
Conclusion
1. Taking into account full contributions to the scattering amplitudes, we have drived unitarity conditions that can be translated into bounds on the masses of sclar fields.
2. While the upper mass bound of the singlet scalar becomes divergent in the decoupling limit , the bound becomes very strong,GeV in the maximal angle .
![Page 44: Unitarity Constraints in the SM with a singlet scalar](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062410/56816354550346895dd3fb92/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
2013. 7. 30 @ KIAS, Jubin Park 44
Conclusion
1. In the unitarized Higgs inflation scenario, a tiny mixing angle is required for the singlet scalar with around GeV mass.
2. In the TeV scale dark matter scenario, we have drived upper bound on the singlet scalar mass, TeV , by combining the observed relic abundance with the unitarity.