unit 4, motivation theories

35
THEORIES OF THEORIES OF MOTIVATION MOTIVATION BY: BY: Jitender Sharma Jitender Sharma

Upload: jiten-sharma

Post on 26-Jan-2015

157 views

Category:

Technology


5 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Unit 4, motivation theories

THEORIES OF THEORIES OF

MOTIVATIONMOTIVATIONBY:BY:

Jitender SharmaJitender Sharma

Page 2: Unit 4, motivation theories

THEORIES OF MOTIVATIONTHEORIES OF MOTIVATION• NEED OR CONTENT THEORY Need hierarchy theory- Maslow Two factor theory-Frederick Herzberg ERG theory-Clayton Alderfer Acquired-needs theory-David C.McClelland• COGNITIVE THEORIES Equity theory-J.Stacy Adams

Expectancy theory-Victor H. Vroom,Porter and Lawler model Goal setting theory-Locke and latham

Page 3: Unit 4, motivation theories

• Reinforcement theory-B.F.Skinner• Behavioural theories Theory X and Theory Y-McGregor Theory Z- Ouchi

Page 4: Unit 4, motivation theories

Douglas McGregor'sDouglas McGregor's Theory X And Theory Theory X And Theory

YY• Theory X and Theory Y are two sets

of assumptions about human nature. They describe two contrasting models of workforce motivation.

• Theory X and Theory Y have to do with the perceptions managers hold on their employees, not the way they generally behave

Page 5: Unit 4, motivation theories

Theory XTheory XAssumptions of Assumptions of

Theory XTheory X • The average human being is inherently lazy by

nature and desires to work as little as possible.• He avoids accepting responsibility and prefers to

be led or directed by some other.• He is self-centered and indifferent to

organizational needs.• He has little ambition, dislikes responsibility,

prefers to be led but wants security.• He is not very intelligent and lacks creativity in

solving organizational problems.• He is, by nature ,resistant to change of any type.

Page 6: Unit 4, motivation theories

Theory YTheory Y Assumptions of Theory YAssumptions of Theory Y

• An average man is not really against doing work.• People can be self-directed and creative at work if

they are motivated properly.• External control and threats of punishment alone

do not bring out efforts towards organizational objectives.

• People have capacity to exercise imagination and creativity.

• People are not by nature passive or resistant to organizational needs.

• An average human being learns under proper conditions. He is also willing to accept responsibility.

.

Page 7: Unit 4, motivation theories

ABRAHAM MASLOW’SABRAHAM MASLOW’SHIERARCHY OF NEEDS HIERARCHY OF NEEDS

THEORYTHEORY•  Maslow's theory is based on the Hierarchy of

Human Needs. According to Maslow, human behavior is related to his needs. It is adjusted as per the nature of needs to be satisfied. In hierarchy of needs theory, Maslow identified five types / sets of human need arranged in a hierarchy of their importance and priority :

1. Physiological Needs  2. Security / Safety Needs 3. Social Needs  4. Esteem Needs 5. Self-actualization Needs

Page 8: Unit 4, motivation theories

Maslow’s Hierarchy of NeedsMaslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

Self-Self-

actualizationactualization

EsteemEsteem

SocialSocial

SafetySafety

PhysiologyPhysiologyFoodFood

AchievementAchievement

StatusStatus

FriendshipFriendship

StabilityStability

JobJob

FriendsFriends

PensionPension

BaseBase

NEEDSNEEDSGeneral ExamplesGeneral Examples Organizational ExamplesOrganizational Examples

jobjobChallengingChallenging

titletitle

at workat work

planplan

salarysalary

Page 9: Unit 4, motivation theories

CLAYTON ALDERFER’SCLAYTON ALDERFER’SERG THEORYERG THEORY

• This theory ,like Maslow’s theory, describes needs as a hierarchy. Maslow’s Five needs have been condensed into Three needs:

• Existence needs- These include need for basic material necessities. In short, it includes an individual’s physiological and physical safety needs.

• Relatedness needs : Maslow’s social needs and external component of esteem needs fall under this class of need.

• Growth needs : Maslow’s self-actualization needs and intrinsic component of esteem needs fall under this category of need.

Page 10: Unit 4, motivation theories

ALDERFER’S THREE NEEDS

Page 11: Unit 4, motivation theories

DAVID MCCLELLAND’SDAVID MCCLELLAND’SACQUIRED NEEDS THEORYACQUIRED NEEDS THEORY

• McClelland classified three basic motivating needs:

• Need for achievement (nACH): The n-ach person is 'achievement motivated' and therefore seeks achievement, attainment of realistic but challenging goals, and advancement in the job

• Need for Power (nPWR): The n-pow person is 'authority motivated'. This driver produces a need to be influential, effective and to make an impact. There is a strong need to lead and for their ideas to prevail.

• Need for Affiliation (nAFF): The n-affil person is 'affiliation motivated', and has a need for friendly relationships and is motivated towards interaction with

other people.

Page 12: Unit 4, motivation theories

Frederick Herzberg’sFrederick Herzberg’sTwo-factor theoryTwo-factor theory

• This Theory was propounded by American Psychologist Frederick Herzberg.

• It is also known as “Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory” and ”Dual-Factor Theory”

Page 13: Unit 4, motivation theories

• The Theory states that there are certain factors in the workplace that cause job satisfaction, while a separate set of factors cause dissatisfaction. In other words, factors that cause job dissatisfaction are different from the factors that lead to job satisfaction.

• The opposite of satisfaction is not dissatisfaction but ‘No Satisfaction’.

• Similarly, The opposite of dissatisfaction is not satisfaction but ‘No Dissatisfaction’.

Page 14: Unit 4, motivation theories

• Hence, the Two-factor theory distinguishes between:

• Motivators :(e.g. challenging work, recognition, responsibility) that give positive satisfaction, arising from intrinsic conditions of the job itself, such as recognition, achievement, or personal growth.

• Hygiene factors (e.g. status, job security, salary, fringe benefits, work conditions) that do not give positive satisfaction, though dissatisfaction results from their absence. These are extrinsic to the work itself, and include aspects such as company policies, supervisory practices, or wages/salary

Page 15: Unit 4, motivation theories
Page 16: Unit 4, motivation theories

TWO FACTOR THEORY , HERZBERG

Page 17: Unit 4, motivation theories

EQUITY THEORY

•  First developed in 1963 by John Stacey Adams, a workplace and behavioral psychologist, the equity theory is based on the human instinct of comparison with others.

Page 18: Unit 4, motivation theories

• Equity theory states that employees seek to maintain equity between the inputs that they bring to a job and the outcomes that they receive from it against the perceived inputs and outcomes of others.

• While evaluating fairness, employee compares

the job input (in terms of contribution) to outcome (in terms of compensation) and also compares the same with that of another peer of equal cadre/category. O/I ratio (output-input ratio) is used to make such a comparison.

Page 19: Unit 4, motivation theories

• The persons, system or selves against which individuals compare themselves are known as Referents.

• Referents can be classified as:1. Persons2. Systems3. Self

Page 20: Unit 4, motivation theories
Page 21: Unit 4, motivation theories

B.F. SKINNER’SREINFORCEMENT THEORY

• According to this theory, past actions and their outcomes influence a person’s present and future actions.

• Past behaviours associated with positive outcomes are repeated in future and behaviours associated with negative outcomes are not repeated.

• Therefore, the behaviour of a person is not influenced by his inner needs and desires but by the external environment.

Page 22: Unit 4, motivation theories

KINDS OF REINFORCEMENTSKINDS OF REINFORCEMENTS• Four kinds of Reinforcements can result from employee behaviour:

1. Positive Reinforcement such as a pay raise or promotion, is provided as a reward for positive behavior with the intention of increasing the probability that the desired behavior will be repeated.

2. Negative Reinforcement is an attempt to show an employee what the consequences of improper behavior will be. If an employee does not engage in improper behavior, he or she will not experience the consequence.

3. Punishment such as suspensions, threats ,etc,  is an attempt to decrease the likelihood of a behavior recurring by applying negative consequences.

4. Extinction Behaviour is basically ignoring the behavior of a subordinate and not providing either positive or negative reinforcement

Page 23: Unit 4, motivation theories

EDWIN LOCKE’S EDWIN LOCKE’S GOAL SETTING THEORY GOAL SETTING THEORY

• Goal-Setting Theory– Proposes that setting specific goals

increase performance, and difficult (challenging) goals result in higher performance than easy goals.

• Benefits of Goal-Setting– The specificity (particularity) of the goal

itself acts as an internal stimulus (stimulation).• E.g. When a sales representative commits

(promises) to making eight sales calls daily, this commitment gives him/her a specific goal to attain.

Page 24: Unit 4, motivation theories

Goal-Setting TheoryGoal-Setting Theory

Page 25: Unit 4, motivation theories

WILLIAM OUCHI’STHEORY Z

• Theory Z is an approach to management based upon a combination of American and Japanese management philosophies and characterized by, among other things, long-term job security, consensual decision making, slow evaluation and promotion procedures, and individual responsibility within a group context. Proponents of Theory Z suggest that it leads to improvements in organizational performance.

Page 26: Unit 4, motivation theories

American Organizations

Japanese Organizations

THEORY Z

Short-term employment Lifetime employment

Lifetime employment

Individual decision making

Collective decision making

Collective decision making

Individual responsibility Collective responsibility

Individual responsibility

Rapid evaluation & promotion

Slow evaluation & promotion

Slow evaluation & promotion

Explicit control mechanisms

Implicit control mechanisms

Implicit control mechanisms

Segmented concern for employee as an employee

Holistic concern for employee as a person

Holistic concern for employee as a person

Page 27: Unit 4, motivation theories

Victor Vroom’sVictor Vroom’sExpectancy TheoryExpectancy Theory

• This theory states that an individual tends to act in a certain way based ona) the expectation that the act will be

followed by a given outcome andb) the attractiveness of that outcome to the

individual.

– Key to the theory is understanding employee goals and the linkages (relationships) between effort, performance and rewards.

Page 28: Unit 4, motivation theories

• Motivation= Expectancy X Instrumentality X Valence ;

• Where,

1. Expectancy (effort-performance linkage)• How hard do I have to work to achieve a certain level

of performance? and Can I actually achieve that level?

2. Instrumentality (performance-reward linkage)• What reward will that level of performance get me?

3. Valence or attractiveness of reward• How attractive is the reward to me?

Whether employees are motivated or not depends on their particular goals and their perception of the level of performance needed to attain those goals.

Page 29: Unit 4, motivation theories

Simplified Expectancy Model

Page 30: Unit 4, motivation theories

The Porter-Lawler model The Porter-Lawler model of motivationof motivation

• Lyman W. Porter and Edward E. Lawler developed a more complete version of the expectancy theory.

• The theory states actual performance in a job is primarily determined by the effort spent. But it is also affected by the person’s ability to do the job and also by individual’s perception of what the required task is. So performance is the responsible factor that leads to intrinsic as well as extrinsic rewards. These rewards, along with the equity of individual leads to satisfaction. Hence, satisfaction of the individual depends upon the fairness of the reward.

Page 31: Unit 4, motivation theories
Page 32: Unit 4, motivation theories

Job design theoryJob design theory• The Theory states that managers should design

jobs deliberately and thoughtfully to reflect the demands of the changing environment, the organization's technology and employees’ skills ,abilities and preferences.

• When jobs are designed like that, employees are motivated to work hard.

• Managers can design motivating jobs in the following ways:

1. Job Enlargement2. Job Enrichment3. Job Characteristic model.

Page 33: Unit 4, motivation theories

Job Characteristics ModelIt was given by Richard Hackman and Greg Oldh-man.The model has three elements:• Core job characteristics skill variety tasks identity tasks significance autonomy feedback• Critical Psychological states feeling that the work is meaningful knowing that they are responsible actually finding out the results

Page 34: Unit 4, motivation theories

• Outcomes: high internal work motivation high satisfaction of growth needs high degree of job satisfaction high degree of work effectiveness

Page 35: Unit 4, motivation theories