unit 2 economy in the short run is-lm framework · 1.7 self assessment questions 1.8 suggested...
TRANSCRIPT
2
LESSON 1
EQUILIBRIUM DETERMINATION AND MULTIPLIER
1. STRUCTURE
1.1 Objective
1.2 Introduction
1.3 Equilibrium in Two and Three Sector Economy
1.4 Concept of Multiplier
1.5 Automatic Stabilizers
1.6 Summary
1.7 Self Assessment Questions
1.8 Suggested Readings
1.1 OBJECTIVE
After reading this lesson, you should be able to
a) Explain different types of Economy – Open and Closed
b) Understand the concept of Equilibrium using AD-AS and S-I Approach
c) Differentiate between different types of multipliers.
d) Analyze Automatic Stabilizers
e) Explain and analyze the changes in Equilibrium
1.2 INTRODUCTION
Economics has two diverse fields – Micro and Macro. While Micro is concerned with analysis of
a particular unit, macro economics is concerned with the aggregate or the total. In macro
economics, the economies can be classified as Open and closed economy, a closed economy is
one where there is no interaction with the external economies having no export and import. An
open economy on the other hand is one where the economies are interlinked because of export
and import of goods and services. Further there can be two sector, three sector or four sector
economies. In two sector there are Households and Firms. In three sector along with the above
two there is also Government. Four sector comprises of external sector too along with export and
import in addition to above three sectors.
Household: A sector that makes the expenditure for own consumption. The entire expenditure by
this sector can be clubbed under the consumption function which is explained as follows:
C = Ĉ + cY (Linear Consumption function)
Where Ĉ = Autonomous Consumption that is the level of consumption which is fixed
irrespective of the level of income. It is there even at zero level of income. This is the
3
consumption that households derive out of past savings. It thus determines the intercept of
consumption function.
c = Slope of consumption function which shows change in consumption because of change in
income. It is shown by MPC (marginal propensity to consume) = ∆C/∆Y. In a linear
consumption function MPC is constant that is the slope is same everywhere on the consumption
curve. In non linear consumption function however the marginal propensity to consume
decreases with increase in income. For simplicity we assume that the consumption function is
linear with constant MPC.
Y = Real Income or total output of the economy.
Linear consumption function can be plotted as:
Figure 1: Linear Consumption Curve
Here consumption function is a straight line starting from an intercept shown by Ĉ showing the
level of consumption which is there even at zero level of income which is being supported by
past savings. The slope is given by MPC (Marginal Propensity to consume).
Firm: This is the second component of macroeconomics. It shows all expenditure done by the
private enterprises that spend so that goods or services can be manufactured and sold further. For
simplicity it is assumed that it is constant or fixed. This assumption would be relaxed in the next
chapter when we discuss the concept of IS-LM curves. It is shown by
I = Ȋ that is autonomous investment or fixed investment
4
Figure 2: Investment Curve
Investment by private enterprises is fixed irrespective of the level of income or rate of interest in
the economy. This assumption would however be relaxed later in the IS-LM model.
Government: This is the third component in macroeconomics. Government has mainly three
functions – imposition of tax, granting of subsidy, and government expenditure also called
government purchases.
External Sector: The last component of open economy that includes export and import of goods
and services.
1.3 EQUILIBRIUM IN TWO SECTOR AND THREE SECTOR ECONOMY
Equilibrium is a state of rest where there is no tendency to change. An economy is said to be in
equilibrium when the total output (real disposable income) is equal to the total or aggregate
demand as shown by:
Y = AD where AD = C + I (in 2 sector economy) and C + I + G (in 3 sector economy).
If Y ≠ AD there is disequilibrium and it leads to unplanned inventory which is calculated as:
IU = Y – AD
5
If Y > AD, there is accumulation of inventory as total output being produced is more than the
total demand in the economy leading to increase in the unplanned stock and IU > 0 whereas
If Y < AD, there is depletion of inventory as total output being produced in the economy is less
than the total demand and hence the excess demand is met out of the stock that reduces the
existing stock and IU < 0.
Equilibrium in Two Sector Economy
A two sector economy is one where there is presence of households and private firms and there
is neither government nor the external sector. It can also be called a closed economy as there is
no interaction with the outside world in the form of exports and imports. A two sector economy
would be in equilibrium when the total output is equal to aggregate demand by the households
and firms as shown below:
Y = AD, Y = C + I, Y = Ĉ + cY + Ȋ, Y = Ᾱ + cY
Where Ᾱ = Ĉ + Ȋ its autonomous spending
Y – cY = Ᾱ, Y(1-c) = Ᾱ, Y = Ᾱ/(1-c). Thus the equilibrium condition is
Y = Ᾱ / (1-c)
Equilibrium is thus dependent on autonomous spending and marginal propensity to consume. If
any or both of them changes there is change in the equilibrium level of output.
Equilibrium can also be attained using an alternative approach as shown below:
Y = C + S (As households can either consume the income or save it). Thus total income is spent
on either the consumption or saving.
S = Y – C, S = Y – (Ĉ + cY), S = – Ĉ + (1- c) Y,
In equilibrium Y = AD (C +I). So from above two equations we get
C + S = C + I, S = I.
Here savings are the leakages from the economy and investment is the injection in the economy.
Thus according to this approach equilibrium is where leakages and injections are equal.
Both the above equilibriums can be presented in the following figure:
6
Figure 3: Equilibrium in 2 sector economy
Equilibrium in two sector economy can be achieved by using two approaches that is Y = AD
approach also called Keynesian cross or Savings and Investment approach which is derived from
the above approach only. In the figure above there is a 45 degree guideline that shows that any
point on this guideline is the equilibrium as the values on X axis ans Y axis are equidistant on the
guideline. Thus equilibrium would always be on this line. Then there is consumption function
that is shown by C which is the linear consumption function with slope ‘c’ and AD is the
aggregate demand curve that is parallel to C. The point where guideline and consumption
function intersect is the break even point where savings are zero and Y = C. It is shown by point
7
B at Y1 level of income. Equilibrium is where guideline and AD intersect which is at point E in
the Keynesian cross and E* in the panel below and equilibrium level of output is Y2.
Equilibrium in Three Sector Economy
A three sector economy is one where there is presence of government in addition to the
households and firms. Households spend on consumption, Firms spend on Investment and
Government performs three functions – Government expenditure called government purchases
which is assumed to be autonomous, collect taxes (it can be fixed or proportionate tax) and
provides transfer payments which is also assumed to be constant. The equilibrium thus can be
attained in two ways:
When there are Fixed Taxes
Equilibrium condition is
Y = AD,
Now here aggregate demand comprises of consumption which is dependent on disposable
income and not only income as was in two sector income as income and disposable income are
different because of presence of taxes and transfer payments in case of three sector economy
whereas in two sector economy the disposable income and income were one and the same.
Y = C + I + G, Y = Ĉ + cYd + Ȋ + Ḡ, Y = Ĉ + c(Y – TA + TR) + Ȋ + Ḡ
Where TA and TR are assumed to be constant in addition to Investment and government
Y = Ᾱ + cY, Y = Ᾱ /1-c (Equilibrium Condition)
Figure 4: Equilibrium in 3 sector using Fixed Taxes
8
When there are proportionate taxes
Y = AD, Y = C + I + G, Y = Ĉ + cYd + Ȋ + Ḡ, Y = Ĉ + c(Y – tY + TR) + Ȋ + Ḡ
Where TR is assumed to be constant in addition to Investment and government purchases and tax
rate is fixed as a proportion of Y.
Y = Ᾱ + c (1-t)Y, Y = Ᾱ /1-c(1-t) (Equilibrium Condition)
Figure 5: Equilibrium in 3 sector using Proportionate Taxes
Both the cases above consider Yd as compared to Y used in two sector economy. Yd is the
disposable income that is the income available in the income after deduction of taxes and
addition of transfer payments. In fixed tax the slope of aggregate demand function is given by
MPC (c) which is same as that of two sector economy as impact of taxes and transfer payments
is considered in autonomous spending. On the other hand slope of aggregate demand function
with proportionate taxes is c (1-t). Thus aggregate demand curve becomes flatter as slope of AD
reduces. The difference between the two equilibrium outputs would be shown under automatic
stabilizers.
1.4 CONCEPT OF MULTIPLIER
The change in equilibrium level of output because of change in autonomous spending by 1 Re is
known as multiplier. As shown above the equilibrium output in a two sector economy is given by
the following equation:
9
Y = Ᾱ / (1-c) where Ᾱ = Autonomous spending that includes fixed consumption by the
households and autonomous investment by private firms.
c = Marginal Propensity to consume (MPC).
From the above equation the value of multiplier can be obtained as:
∆Y = ∆Ᾱ / (1-c), ∆Y = 1 / (1-c). ∆Ᾱ
Thus the change in equilibrium level of output is more than the change in autonomous spending
because of presence of multiplier shown by the 1 / (1-c).
Example 1: Let Autonomous spending increases by Re 1 and MPC is 0.8 then value of
multiplier would be: 1 / (1-0.8) = 5 times that is change in equilibrium level of output is more
than change in autonomous spending.
The value of multiplier depends on the value of ‘c’ and as ‘c’ varies from 0 to 1 so the value of
multiplier also varies from 1 to infinity as shown below:
Example 2: Calculate value of multiplier in the following cases: a) MPC = 0 b) MPC = 1, c)
MPC = 0.2 d) MPC = 0.8
Solution: a) 1 / (1-0) = 1 times so no multiplier effect. ∆Y = ∆Ᾱ
b) 1 / (1-1) = Infinity
c) 1 / (1-0.2) = 1.25 times ∆Y > ∆Ᾱ
d) 1 / (1-0.8) = 5 times, ∆Y > ∆Ᾱ
Thus it shows that multiplier has a direct relation with MPC, the greater is MPC the higher is the
value of multiplier.
Graphical derivation of Multiplier
Figure 6: Multiplier in Two Sector Economy
10
The figure above shows original Aggregate demand curve with an intercept equal to autonomous
spending and slope equal to MPC. Equilibrium is where the AD intersects the guideline shown
by Y1 level of output. If there is an increase in autonomous spending by ∆Ᾱ, the aggregate
demand curve shifts parallel up by the same amount as slope is still the same (c). The new
equilibrium is at Y2 level of output. The increase in output from Y1 to Y2 is the change in
equilibrium level of output shown by the horizontal and vertical arrows whereas the distance
between the two aggregate demand curves is ∆Ᾱ. Thus graphically also it shows that ∆Y > ∆Ᾱ
because of multiplier.
To show the impact of MPC on multiplier we can take the following two cases that show that as
MPC increases multiplier also increases:
Figure 7 (a): Multiplier and Marginal Propensity to Consume
Figure 7 (b): Multiplier and Marginal Propensity to Consume
11
Figure in panel (a) shows aggregate demand curve corresponding to a MPC of ‘c’ which is less
than MPC (c’) exhibited by panel (b). Thus the slope of aggregate demand curve of panel (a) is
less than that of panel (b). The intercept in both the cases is shown by autonomous spending an
increase with initial equilibrium at Y1 level of output in panel (a) and Y1’ in panel (b). With an
increase in autonomous spending by ∆Ᾱ in both the cases the equilibrium is at Y2 in panel (a)
and Y2’ in panel (b). the change in output is greater in case of higher MPC shoeing that there is a
direct relation between MPC and multiplier which is because of the fact that aggregate demand
curve is steeper in the second case as compared to the first one.
Multiplier in case of Three Sector Economy
Figure 8: Multiplier in Three Sector Economy
The figure above shows original Aggregate demand curve in case of three sector economy with
proportionate tax with an intercept equal to autonomous spending and slope equal to c(1-t).
Equilibrium is where the AD intersects the guideline shown by Y1 level of output. If there is an
increase in autonomous spending by ∆Ᾱ, the aggregate demand curve shifts parallel up by the
same amount as slope is still the same c(1-t). The new equilibrium is at Y2 level of output. The
increase in output from Y1 to Y2 is the change in equilibrium level of output shown by the
horizontal and vertical arrows whereas the distance between the two aggregate demand curves is
∆Ᾱ. Thus graphically also it shows that ∆Y > ∆Ᾱ because of multiplier.
12
The above discussion thus shows that the economy moves to a new level of equilibrium output
when there is change in the autonomous spending, the quantum of change depends on the
marginal propensity to consume and also on the taxation system being applicable in the economy
(fixed or proportionate tax). However ever economy tries not to deviate too much from the initial
equilibrium and there are certain forces imbibed in the economy itself that prevents a drastic
change which are known as the automatic stabilizers. It is being taken up in the next heading:
1.5 CONCEPT OF AUTOMATIC STABILIZER
Automatic stabilizers offset fluctuations in economic activity without direct intervention by
policymakers. When incomes are high, tax liabilities rise and eligibility for government benefits
falls, without any change in the tax code or other legislation. Conversely, when incomes slip, tax
liabilities drop and more families become eligible for government transfer programs, such as
food stamps and unemployment insurance that help buttress their income.
Two examples of Automatic stabilizers are:
Proportionate Tax – The presence of proportionate tax reduces the multiplier effect thereby
bringing a lesser diversion in the equilibrium income as compared to fixed tax. This is because in
case of proportionate taxes whatever is the change in income because of change in the
autonomous spending a part of it goes to the government in form of taxation and hence
disposable income is less as compared to fixed taxes. This can be illustrated using the following
example and figure:
Example 3: If MPC is 0.8 and tax rate is 0.5 in case of proportionate tax. The effect of automatic
stabilizer can be shown as:
Slope of AD in case of fixed Tax = c = 0.8
Slope of AD in case of Proportionate Tax = c (1-t) = 0.8 (1-0.5) = 0.4
Thus AD is flatter in case of proportionate tax as compared to fixed tax and change in
equilibrium using above data can be shown as:
13
Figure 9 (a): Change in Equilibrium Output in case of Proportionate Tax
Figure 9 (b): Change in Equilibrium Output in case of Fixed Tax
Thus in case of Fixed Tax the change in equilibrium level of output is greater as multiplier effect
is more as can be shown mathematically too:
Multiplier Effect in case of Fixed Tax: 1/1-c = 1/1-0.8 = 5 times
14
Multiplier Effect in case of Proportionate Tax: 1/1-c (1-t) = 1/1-0.8(1-0.5) =1.67 times
Thus it is visible that multiplier effect weakens in case of proportionate tax because of reduction
in disposable income as with every increase in income a part of it goes towards payment of taxes
and hence less is available with the households for consumption as compared to fixed tax where
tax is fixed irrespective of the level of income and hence disposable income is greater that
provides greater change in the output.
Unemployment Benefits – The change in equilibrium output reduces if government provides
unemployment benefits to the households thus acting as a stabilizing agent.
Impact of Fiscal Policy on the Equilibrium Level of Output
Fiscal policy refers to change in the government policy with respect to change in government
expenditure or taxation policy. There are two types of Fiscal policy – Expansionary fiscal policy
where there is either increase in Government purchases or decrease in taxes and contractionary
fiscal policy where the government reduces the government purchases or increases the tax. The
former brings and upward shift in the aggregate demand curve causing a change in the
equilibrium level of output as shown below:
Figure 10: Effect of Fiscal policy on Equilibrium
The figure above shows that original equilibrium is at Y1 level of output where AD is
intersecting the guideline. With an increase in government purchases there is an increase in
15
autonomous spending as government purchases is a part of autonomous spending. This shifts the
AD curve parallel up and new equilibrium is at Y2. The change in equilibrium level of output
from Y1 to Y2 is because of fiscal policy. This change is more than change in government
purchases because of presence of government multiplier.
1.6 SUMMARY
Micro Economics and macro economics are two parts that are studied in Economics. While
micro economics deals with an individual unit – its equilibrium determination, pricing decisions
and policies. Macro economics is wider in sense as it covers all the components of an economy.
The equilibrium condition in both the economics is broadly the same that is where demand and
supply are equal and there is neither excess demand nor excess supply. In macro we just change
the demand to aggregate demand and supply to total output or total income. Macro Economics
can be a two sector economy comprising of only households that spend on consumption
expenditure and private firms that go for investment expenditure, a three sector economy having
Government in addition to the above two sectors that spends on purchases, collect taxes and
provides subsidies and a four sector economy that is also called open economy as it includes the
external sector too in addition to above three, it makes expenditure on imports and earns though
exports. Equilibrium condition is where total output produced in an economy is exactly equal to
the total demand by the different sectors and in case the two are not equal there are changes in
the unplanned inventory and automatic forces that bring the economy back to equilibrium.
Further once equilibrium is attained it may change over a period of time if any component of
autonomous spending changes but the change in equilibrium level of output is more than the
change in autonomous spending and this is because of the presence of multiplier which is
dependent on marginal propensity to consume and/or proportionate taxes. This change in the
equilibrium level of output should not be very large as that can be destabilizing for the economy
so there are some automatic stabilizers in the economy that prevents the economy from moving
too far off from the initial equilibrium. There are two main stabilizers that is proportionate tax
and unemployment benefits that help in reducing the gap between original and new equilibrium
level of output.
1.7 SELF ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS
Check your progress
Exercise 1: True and False
(a) Macro Economics is narrower as compared to Micro Economics
(b) Both micro and macro economics attain equilibrium when demand and supply are equal.
(c) A two sector Economy is also called open economy.
(d) Taxes in a three sector economy are always assumed to be autonomous.
(e) Multiplier shows the change in equilibrium level of output because of change in autonomous
spending.
(f) Equilibrium level of output depends on the slope of Aggregate demand curve
Ans. 1(F), 2(T), 3(F), 4(F), 5(T), 6(T)
16
Exercise 2: Fill in the Blanks
(a) A three sector economy has three components namely _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
(b) If MPC is 1 then value of multiplier is _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
(c) The two automatic stabilizers are _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .and _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
(d) An open economy is one where there is _ _ _ _ _ _ _ in addition to households, firms and
government purchases.
Ans 1. Households, Firms and Government 2. Infinity 3. Proportional Tax and Unemployment
Benefits 4. External Sector.
Exercise 3: Questions
1. Explain the equilibrium in case of two sector Economy.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2. Why the change in equilibrium level of output is greater than change in autonomous
spending.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3. How is equilibrium attained in case of three sector economy with proportionate tax.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
4. Explain the concept of automatic stabilizers by giving suitable example.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
5. Explain how fixed taxes bring more change in equilibrium as compared to proportionate
tax.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
6. Explain the concept of multiplier in a two sector economy.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
7. What is the effect of expansionary fiscal policy on the equilibrium level of output.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
8. What is the role of government in a three sector economy.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
1.8 SUGGESTED READINGS
Mankiw, N. Gregory, Macro Economics, Macmillan Worth Publishers New York, Hampshire
U.K..
Dornbusch, Rudiger and Stanley, Fischer, Macro Economics Theory, McGraw-Hill
Barro Robert J., Macroeconomics Theory and Applications, MIT Press.
17
LESSON 2
IS-LM DETERMINATION
2. STRUCTURE
2.1 Objective
2.2 Introduction
2.3 Derivation of IS curve
2.4 Derivation of LM curve
2.5 Numerical on IS-LM
2.6 Summary
2.7 Self Assessment Questions
2.8 Suggested Readings
2.1 OBJECTIVE
After reading this lesson, you should be able to
a) Explain derivation of equilibrium in goods and money market
b) Understand the concept of simultaneous equilibrium
c) Differentiate between fiscal and monetary policy multipliers.
d) Analyze Aggregate Demand curve.
e) Explain and analyze the changes in Aggregate Demand curve
2.2 INTRODUCTION
The previous chapter discussed about how equilibrium is obtained in a two sector and three
sector economy and what is the change in output because of change in the autonomous spending.
This chapter would discuss about how the goods market and money market are in equilibrium
and how both achieve the simultaneous equilibrium. For explaining the equilibrium in Goods
market IS curve would be derived where I stands fro investment and S stands for saving.
Equilibrium in Money market would be explained through LM curve (L stands for demand of
real money and M stands for supply of real money). IS-LM analysis was introduced by Prof.
Hicks in 1937 to explain the short run phenomenon. It would further explain the relationship
between price level and equilibrium level of output through the aggregate demand curve and
changes in the aggregate demand curve because of fiscal or monetary policy multiplier. The
fiscal policy explains the change in the government expenditure or taxation policy to bring a
change in the equilibrium level of output whereas monetary policy shows change in the money
supply to bring a change in the level of income. There are certain assumptions on which the
whole IS-LM model is based like constant price level, firms willing to supply any amount of
quantity at the given price and the short run aggregate supply curve is flat.
2.3 DERIVATION OF IS CURVE
IS and LM curve analysis is applicable in the short run where the price level is assumed to be
constant.
18
IS curve shows different combinations of real interest rates and equilibrium level of output where
goods market is in equilibrium. Derivation of IS curve can be established through the following
two steps:
Derivation of Investment Function: Investment is the total expenditure done by the private firms.
It is an important component of aggregate demand function. Earlier investment was assumed to
be autonomous but now it would be explained as follows:
I = Ȋ + ar
Where Ȋ = Autonomous investment which is not related to rate of interest
a = Sensitivity of Investment to real rate of interest
r = Real rate of interest
There is inverse relation between rate of interest and level of investment as if rate of interest
increases there is decrease in investment because it is expensive for the firms to borrow and
invest whereas a lower interest rate increases the amount of borrowing and investment by the
firms. But how sensitive is the investment to rate of interest depends on ‘a’ which shows the
sensitivity of investment to interest.
Investment function can be shown graphically as:
Figure 1: Investment Function
Panel (a) shows a steeper investment curve which shows a lesser value of ‘a’ that is investment is
not that sensitive to rate of interest showing that when rate of interest reduces investment
expands but by a smaller quantum whereas in panel (b) the curve is flatter because of greater ‘a’
19
and higher sensitivity of investment to rate of interest showing that reduction in rate of interest
increases the investment by a greater amount.
After getting the investment function the equilibrium in goods market can be attained as follows:
Equilibrium is when the economy which is a three sector economy and in the short run has its
output and aggregate demand in equilibrium
Y = AD, Y = C + I + G, Y = Ĉ + cYd + Ȋ - ar + G,
Y = Ĉ + c(Y – tY + TR) + Ȋ - ar + G,
Y = A + (1-t) Y – ar, Y = A-ar/1- c (1-t) (Equilibrium condition)
Thus here the equilibrium is the same as in case of three sector economy with proportionate tax
with an addition of ‘ar’. The IS can be derived graphically as:
Figure 2: IS Curve
IS curve is derived from the Keynesian cross in figure above in the upper part. When interest rate
is r1 the investment is I1 where the corresponding aggregate demand curve is AD and equilibrium
level of output is Y1. If rate of interest reduces investment increases and there is a parallel
upward shift in the AD curve with a new equilibrium level of output Y2. Thus there is an inverse
relation between real rate of interest and equilibrium level of output as shown in the figure
above. It is because when rate of interest reduces, investment increases and it being a part of AD
20
the aggregate demand increases. In the equilibrium Y should be equal to AD and when AD
increases Y also has to increase to retain the equilibrium, thus bringing an inverse relation
between rate of interest and equilibrium level of output. Now moving to derivation of slope and
position of IS curve.
Modifying above equation we get:
Y = A-ar/1- c (1-t), r = A/a – Y/mga where mg = 1/1- c (1-t),
Thus slope of the IS curve is -1/ mga and position of IS curve depends on autonomous spending
that is A. The negative sign in the slope shows that IS curve is downward sloping. The slope in
turn depends on government multiplier ‘mg’ which in turn depends on MPC (c) and sensitivity of
investment to rate of interest ‘a’. The slope of IS can be shown as follows:
Let us elaborate taking two different MPC c1 = 0.2 and c2 = 0.8. Assuming proportionate tax to
be 0.5 we calculate government multiplier. In the first case mg1 would be 1/1-0.2(1-0.5) = 1.11
and in the second case it is mg2 = 1/1-0.8(1-0.5) = 1.67. Thus it shows that higher the MPC
higher is the government multiplier and lower would be the slope and flatter would be the IS. It
can be shown graphically as:
Figure 3: Slope of IS Curve
21
Above figure shows how different Marginal Propensity to Consume have different impact on the
slope of the IS curve. the slope of aggregate demand curve in a two sector economy is given by
MPC only but in three sector economy with proportionate tax the slope changes to MPC(1-tax
rate). Taking this further we would show how there can be different slope of IS because of
different government multiplier which in turn depends on MPC. Initially the aggregate demand
curve is AD having an intercept of A-ar1 and as MPC is 0.2 which is lesser than MPC of 0.8 so
this AD is flatter. It gives equilibrium of Y1. Now if interest rate reduces the AD curve shifts
parallel up and provides a new equilibrium at Y2 level of income. Joining the two combinations
we get the IS curve corresponding to c1 level of marginal propensity to consume. Now similarly
if we draw IS curve corresponding to a higher level of MPC (0.8) we get a flatter IS’ curve
whose slope is lesser than the previous IS because of the government multiplier being large and
hence slope being less.
Similarly the component that affects the intercept or position of the IS curve is given by
autonomous spending (A) In case of three sector economy Autonomous spending comprises of
autonomous consumption, autonomous investment by private firms, fixed government purchases
and a part of fixed transfer payments. If any of these components of ‘A’ changes there is a shift
in the IS curve as can be shown below:
Figure 4: Position of IS Curve
22
The above panel shows Keynesian cross that shows equilibrium using a 45 degree guideline and
derivation of equilibrium. Initially at ‘r’ rate of interest and ‘A’ autonomous spending
equilibrium output is Y1. This shows one combination of IS curve where IS passes through ‘r’
and ‘Y1’. Now if autonomous spending increases to A’ there is a parallel upward shift in the AD
curve as slope is still the same. The new equilibrium is at Y2 level of output. Thus there is a
parallel shift in the IS curve to the right showing the change in the position or the intercept of the
IS. The figure above shows that it is the change in the autonomous spending that affects the
intercept/position of the IS curve. Thus fiscal policy by government would bring a shift in the IS
if there is change in autonomous government purchases and if tax rate changes then there would
be change in the slope of IS as change in proportionate tax rate would change the slope of
aggregate demand curve in the Keynesian cross thereby changing the equilibrium level of output.
2.4 DERIVATION OF LM CURVE
LM curve shows different combinations of real interest rates and equilibrium level of output
where money market is in equilibrium. Derivation of LM curve can be established through the
following two steps:
Derivation of Money Demand: Demand for money is demand for transactionary purposes that is
demand for real balances. It is the money that people hold and does not provide any return.
Demand for money can be shown using the following equation:
L = kY – hr
Where L = demand for real money, Y = national income, r = real interest rate, k = sensitivity of
demand to real income and h = sensitivity of money demand to real interest rate of interest.
Demand for money can be plotted as:
Figure 5: Demand of Money
If there is a change in the real rate of interest then there is a movement up or down on the
demand curve whereas with a change in the income the curve shifts to right or left.
23
Equilibrium in Money Market: Money market is in equilibrium when money demand is equal to
money supply. It can be shown as:
kY – hr = M/P
Where M = Nominal money supply which is fixed by the central bank and P = Price level in the
economy. For derivation of LM we assume that central bank keeps the nominal money supply
fixed and P the price level is also fixed as IS-LM is a short run phenomenon where price level is
constant. LM thus can be derived as:
Figure 6: Derivation of LM Curve
LM curve shows equilibrium in the money market and hence it shows the combinations of
different real interest rates and income. Initially the demand curve is shown by kYI-hr1 where
money demand and supply are equal and rate of interest is r1 and corresponding equilibrium
output is Y1. If rate of interest reduces to r2 then money supply being fixed there is excess
demand of money that leads to disequilibrium and restore the equilibrium level of output has to
be reduced which shifts the demand curve of money to left as income reduces and new
equilibrium is at reduced rate of interest and reduced level of income. Both the combinations are
shown in the right hand side diagram. Joining the two combinations we get the upward sloping
LM curve which shows direct relation between rate of interest and equilibrium level of output.
Now to derive the slope and position of LM, the above equilibrium equation can be modified as:
r = 1/h (kY-M/P)
24
Slope of LM is thus k/h that is dependent on sensitivity of demand to real income and rate of
interest and position is dependent on the money supply. The changes in slope and position can be
interpreted as:
Slope of LM curve:
1) If ‘k’ is more the slope is more and LM is steeper
2) If ‘k’ is less the slope is less and LM is flatter
3) If ‘h’ is more the slope is less and LM is flatter
4) If ‘h’ is less the slope is more and LM is steeper
Position of LM curve:
The position of LM curve depends on the nominal money supply keeping price level constant.
This is because if money supply changes there is a change in the equilibrium and shift in the LM.
It can be explained with the diagram below:
Figure 7: Position of LM Curve
Initially the equilibrium is at r1 rate of interest corresponding to a demand curve of money and
real money supply (M as nominal supply and P the price level). The corresponding LM curve is
shown in the right panel. Now if central bank increases the nominal money supply to M1 the new
equilibrium rate of interest reduces to r2 at the same level of equilibrium output. Thus the LM
curve shifts parallel to right to LM1. The shift in LM is thus because of change in the money
supply. If money supply increases LM shifts parallel to right and if money supply reduces then
LM shifts parallel to left.
25
Simultaneous Equilibrium
Simultaneous equilibrium is where both the goods market and money market are in equilibrium.
Any point on the IS curve shows that Goods market is in equilibrium and any point on LM
represents equilibrium in money market. The simultaneous equilibrium is shown in figure below:
Figure 8: Simultaneous Equilibrium
Impact of fiscal Policy on the simultaneous equilibrium
Fiscal policy means change in government expenditure and/or taxes to bring changes in the
equilibrium level of output. If government follows an expansionary fiscal policy and increases
the government expenditure then the autonomous spending would increase and it would bring an
upward parallel shift in the AD curve that would increase the equilibrium level of output at the
same rate of interest. Thus new goods market equilibrium would be at same rate of interest and
higher level of output that would bring a rightward shift in the IS and hence increased level of
output and at that point money market would be in disequilibrium so to bring it to equilibrium
rate of interest would finally increase because of decrease in price level because of increase in
income. It can be shown below:
26
Figure 9: Impact of Fiscal Policy on Equilibrium
Similarly an expansionary monetary policy would increase the money supply and shift LM curve
to right that too would increase the equilibrium level of output and reduce real rate of interest.
Thereby bringing a new simultaneous equilibrium.
2.5 NUMERICAL ON IS-LM
Question 1. Find out IS and LM equation in the following three sector economy
C = 100 + 0.8 Yd
I = 1000 – 5i
G = 80
T = 0.25 Y
L = 0.8Y-0.2i
M = 200
P = 2
27
Solution: Equilibrium in goods market is when Y = AD
Y = C + I + G
Y = 100 + 0.8 (Y-0.25Y) + 1000-5i + 80, 1180 + 0.8*0.75Y-5i , 1180 + 0.6Y-5i
0.4Y = 1180 – 5i, Y = 2950 – 12.5i IS equation
Equilibrium in Money Market is where Money demand = Money supply
0.8Y-0.2i = 200/2, 0.8Y = 100 + 0.2i, Y = 125 – 0.25i LM equation
Question 2 C = 100 + 0.9 Yd, I = 600 – 30r, G = 300, T = 1/3Y, Md = 0.4Y – 50r
M = 1040, P = 2
Full Employment level of equilibrium is 2500.
a) Derive IS and LM equations and compute equilibrium.
b) Explain change in slope and position of IS and LM if MPC changes to 0.6.
Solution: a) Equation of IS curve is Y = AD
Y = 100 + 0.9(Y-1/3Y) + 600 – 30r + 300, Y = 1000 + 0.6Y – 30r, 0.4Y = 1000-30r
Y = 2500 – 75r
Equation of LM curve is Md = Ms
0.4Y – 50r = 1040/2, Y = 1300 + 125r
Solving above IS and LM curve we get the following
2500 – 75r = 1300 + 125r, Y = 2050, r = 6%
b) Impact of MPC is only on the slope of IS curve as it is a part of slope of IS curve
Old Slope = 1/mga = 1/[1/1-0.9(1-1/3)].30 = 0.0133
New Slope = 1/mga = 1/[1/1-0.6(1-1/3)].30 = 0.02
Thus the slope of IS has increased when MPC changes to 0.6
Question 3 (Practice question) C = 100 + 0.8Yd, I = 150 – 6i, G = 100, T = 0.25Y
Md = 0.2Y – 2i, Ms = 300, P = 2
Calculate equilibrium level of output and rate of interest. Also if government spending are raised
from 100 to 150 find the shift in the IS curve.
28
2.6 SUMMARY
The previous chapter talked about how equilibrium is attained in case of two sector and three
sector economy using the concept of Keynesian cross. This chapter talked about attainment of
equilibrium in Goods market and Money market using the concept of IS and LM curves. Where
IS curve gave different combinations of real rate of interest and equilibrium output where goods
market is in equilibrium, the LM curve provided different combinations of the same where
money market achieves its equilibrium. Both IS and LM curves are based on certain assumptions
through which they get their downward or upward sloping slopes and once these assumptions are
relaxed there is a change in the slope and/or position of the two curves. For an economy to be in
total equilibrium both goods and money market should be in equilibrium such that simultaneous
equilibrium is when IS and LM intersects. There can be changes in this simultaneous equilibrium
once achieved by a change in the fiscal or monetary policy as simultaneous equilibrium is based
on IS and LM and if either of them changes there is anew equilibrium. A change in the fiscal
policy brings a new IS curve and a change in the monetary policy changes the LM curve thus
changing the final equilibrium of the economy. While doing IS-LM we assumed that price level
is constant as it is a short run phenomenon but price level usually changes in the long run.
Further IS-LM analysis will be used to derive relation between Price level and equilibrium level
of output known as aggregate demand curve and it would be taken up in the next chapter. As
discussed in the chapter that an increase the government purchases brings a parallel shift in the
IS curve, government increases the purchases to bring an increase in the equilibrium level of
output but while doing so government does not take into consideration the simultaneous increase
in the real rate of interest which in turn reduces the private investment leading to crowding out
and it would be studied in detail in the next chapter.
2.7 SELF ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS
Check your progress
Exercise 1: True and False
(a) IS curve shows equilibrium in money market.
(b) LM curve shows different combinations of rate of interest and equilibrium level of output
where money market is in equilibrium.
(c) A two sector economy does not differentiate between Gross income and Disposable income.
(d) Fiscal policy refers to change in government expenditure or change in taxes.
(e) Multiplier shows the change in equilibrium level of output because of change in autonomous
spending.
(f) Aggregate demand curve shows relation between price level and equilibrium level of output.
(g) Proportionate Tax is zero when income is zero.
(h) If the expenditure of the government is more than the revenue of the government it is called
surplus budget.
Ans. 1(F), 2(T), 3(T), 4(T), 5(T), 6(T), 7(T), 8(F)
29
Exercise 2: Fill in the Blanks
(a) Government has three roles to perform in an economy _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
(b) If MPC is 0 then value of multiplier is _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
(c) The slope of IS curve depends on _ _ _ _ _ _ _ and_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
(d) Slope of LM is _ _ _ _ _ _ _ related to ‘k’ that is sensitivity of demand of money to real
income.
(e) Fiscal Policy means changes in _ _ _ _ _ _ . or _ _ _ _ _ _ .
(f) The shift in the IS curve because of change in government spending can be measured by _ _ .
(g) Monetary policy includes changes in _ _ _ _ _ _ _. in the short run.
(h) The relation between Price level and equilibrium level of output is shown by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
Ans 1. Government Purchases, Tax collection and Transfer Payment 2. Unity
3. Government Multiplier and Sensitivity of Investment to rate of interest. 4. Directly. 5.
Government Purchases or taxes. 6. Government Multiplier. 7. Money Supply 8. Aggregate
Demand Curve
Exercise 3: Questions
1 Explain the equilibrium in case of three sector Economy.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2. Explain the derivation of IS curve and how is its slope and position derived
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3. How is equilibrium attained in case of three sector economy with proportionate tax.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
4. Explain the concept of shift in IS and LM curves.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
5. Explain how the Aggregate demand curve is derived
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
6. What is the reason for inverse relation between real rate of interest and equilibrium
level of output in case of IS curve.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
7. What is the effect of increase in nominal money supply on the LM curve in the
money market
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
8. What is the role of price level in case of money market equilibrium.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
30
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2.8 SUGGESTED READINGS
Mankiw, N. Gregory, Macro Economics, Macmillan Worth Publishers New York, Hampshire
U.K..
Dornbusch, Rudiger and Stanley, Fischer, Macro Economics Theory, McGraw-Hill
Barro Robert J., Macroeconomics Theory and Applications, MIT Press
31
LESSON 3
CROWDING OUT AND DIFFERENT CASES OF LM
3. STRUCTURE
3.1 Objective
3.2 Introduction
3.3 Derivation of Aggregate Demand Curve
3.4 Derivation of Fiscal and Monetary Policy Multiplier
3.5 Crowding Out
3.6 Summary
3.7 Self Assessment Questions
3.8 Suggested Readings
3.1 OBJECTIVE
After reading this lesson, you should be able to
a) Explain derivation of Aggregate Demand Curve
b) Understand the concept of crowding out
c) Differentiate between fiscal and monetary policy multipliers.
d) Analyze shift in Aggregate Demand curve
e) Difference between different types of multipliers
3.2 INTRODUCTION
The previous chapter talked about equilibrium in macro economy that comprises of two sector,
three sector economy with presence of fixed and proportionate tax. It also showed how change in
the autonomous spending brings a change in the equilibrium level of output. The present chapter
goes ahead and talks about the derivation of aggregate demand curve that is basically a long run
phenomenon as it shows relation between price level and equilibrium level of output. The shift in
the aggregate demand curve can be because of shift in either the IS or the LM curve and the
change in the equilibrium level of output and this is shown by the fiscal and monetary policy
multipliers respectively which would be studied in this chapter. Another important topic of
discussion is the crowding out effect that shows how because of increase in the government
spending the rate of interest increases and leads to decrease in the private investment that reduces
the desired effect expected by government. This too would be shown using concept of multiplier
in the present chapter.
3.3 DERIVATION OF AGGREGATE DEMAND CURVE
The concept of IS-LM curve as given by Hicks was based on Short run whereby prices were
assumed to be constant. But here in aggregate demand curve the relation is shown between price
level and equilibrium level of output as it’s a long run phenomenon. The AD curve is derived
from simultaneous equilibrium that is IS-LM curve intersections. It is being shown in figure
below:
32
Figure 1: Derivation of AD curve
Upper panel shows simultaneous equilibrium derived from IS-LM curve. As every LM is
corresponding to a price level. So the initial price level is P where equilibrium output is Y1 and
equilibrium rate of interest is r1. This gives a combination for the AD curve drawn in the panel
below. Now if price level reduces to P1 then real money supply increases assuming nominal
money supply to be constant which shifts the LM curve parallel to right providing a new
equilibrium at r2 and Y2 level of income. This provides second combination for the AD curve
which shows that at reduced price level equilibrium level of national income increases showing
33
inverse relation between price level and equilibrium level of output and thereby providing a
downward sloping AD curve.
3.4 MONETARY AND FISCAL MULTIPLIER
In previous two chapters we discussed about the concept of multiplier that shows change in the
equilibrium level of output because of change in autonomous spending. This can be applied in
case of two sector, three sector economies. The multiplier in three sector economy with
proportionate tax shows what is the desired change in the equilibrium level of output if
government increases its purchases assuming that it has no impact on the interest rates. However
it shows a shift in the IS curve and hence at the new equilibrium only goods market is in
equilibrium. But this is not the equilibrium of the economy as money market is in disequilibrium.
So in this entire process there is increase in the interest rates that crowds out the private
investment and hence actual change in te equilibrium is less than the desired change. While
desired change is shown by the government multiplier, the actual change is shown by fiscal
multiplier. It can be presented diagrammatically as:
34
Figure 2: Fiscal Multiplier and its impact on the AD curve
Panel above shows that initially the Goods equilibrium is shown by IS curve and money market
equilibrium is shown by LM curve which is corresponding to a particular price level that is P*
where simultaneous equilibrium level of output is Y1 and real rate of interest is r1. The panel
below shows that corresponding to Price level P* and Y1 level of output there is an aggregate
demand curve AD. Now if government increases its purchases and expects that the output would
increase to Y2 at the same rate of interest but here the goods market is in equilibrium as this is a
point on the IS curve but money market is not in equilibrium as the point is not on the LM curve.
The new simultaneous equilibrium where both money market and goods market is in equilibrium
is at r2 rate of interest and Y3 level of output which is less than what is expected by the
government. This change from Y1 to Y3 is the fiscal multiplier. It is shown by a parallel
rightward shift in the aggregate demand curve showing that at the same price level because of
increase in government purchases the equilibrium level of output also increases though not in the
same quantum as was expected. The opposite would hold if there is decrease in the government
purchases as aggregate demand curve would shift parallel to left.
Similarly we can show the concept of money multiplier which shows the change in equilibrium
level of output when there is increase in the nominal money supply keeping the price level
constant. When there is increase in the nominal money supply the LM curve shifts to the right as
with increase in money supply there is a reduction in the rate of interest that increases the money
demand to bring the money market to equilibrium again. It can be shown using the following
diagram
Figure 3: Monetary Multiplier and its impact on the AD curve
35
The two panels above show how an increase in the nominal money supply shifts the LM curve to
the right in the above panel that brings a reduction in the real rate of interest and increase in the
equilibrium level of output. This increase in the equilibrium level of output is shown by the
monetary policy multiplier which shows how much is the change in the equilibrium level of
output if nominal money supply changes keeping constant the price level and other factors
impacting the simultaneous equilibrium. An increase in nominal money supply brings a
rightward parallel shift in the aggregate demand curve as shown by the panel below. The reverse
would happen with reduction in the price level.
The concept of Fiscal and Monetary policy multiplier can also be shown mathematically as
follows:
Goods Market is in equilibrium when total output produced is equal to the aggregate demand of
the economy
IS equilibrium Equation is:
Y = Ĉ + cYd + Ȋ - ar + G,
Y = Ĉ + c(Y – tY + TR) + Ȋ - ar + G,
Y = A + (1-t) Y – ar, Y = A-ar/1- c (1-t), Y = mg ( A – ar) ………….(1)
LM equilibrium Equation is:
r = 1/h [ KY – M/P] ………….(2)
Substituting value of interest rate in equation (1) we get
Y = mg [A – a/h (KY – M/P)], Y = mg [ A – aKY/h + Ma/Ph]
Y = mgA – mgaKY/h + mgMa/Ph, Y = mgAhP/Ph – mgaKYP/Ph + mgMa/Ph
YPh = mgAhP – mgaKYP + mgMa
YPh + mgaKYP = mgAhP + mgMa, Y (Ph + mgaKP) = mgAhP + mgMa
Y = mgAhP/ (Ph + mgaKP) + mgMa/(Ph + mgaKP)
Y = mgAh/ (h + mgaK) + mgaM/P(h + mgaK)
Substituting α = hmg/h+Kamg we get
Y = αA + [αa/h] [M/P]
Here Fiscal multiplier shows change in equilibrium level of output because of change in
autonomous spending that includes government expenditure and other components but we
assume that the major component here is government purchases and thus fiscal multiplier shows
the impact of changed government expenditure on equilibrium level of output. Thus ‘α’ shows
how much is the change or shift in the equilibrium when there is a change in government
purchases. Similarly change in the equilibrium level of output because of change in the money
supply is shown by Monetary policy Multiplier that shows by how much there is change in the
equilibrium level of output if nominal money supply changes keeping the price level constant.
Graphically it is shown by a shift in the LM curve as the slope has not changed and only the
36
position is being changed because of the change in the nominal money supply. Thus the two
multipliers that shows the impact of two government policies namely fiscal and monetary policy
are the monetary and fiscal multiplier.
3.5 CROWDING OUT
Gross Domestic Product or national income shows how much production is taking place in any
economy. If the government expects that the production is less than what it should be then it goes
for expansionary fiscal policy where it increases the government purchases assuming that there
would not be any change in the other variables (also the interest rate) and the output would
increase by government multiplier multiplied by change in the government expenditure.
However this is not true as with an increase in the government purchases the aggregate demand
in an economy increases and money supply being constant the real rate of interest increases
because of which the private investment is bound to decrease as there is inverse relation between
rate of interest and private investment. Thus the change in output is less than what is expected by
the government. However whether there can be increase in output or not depends on whether the
economy is operating at full employment that is output is already at potential output and no
further increase in output is possible. Another case can be when the current output is less than the
full employment level and with government policy it is possible to bring an increase in the actual
output. The last case can be when government does not want any crowding out or decrease in
private investment and there by increases the government expenditure by printing of currency
and increasing the money supply simultaneously. All the three cases are shown using the
following diagrams:
Figure 4 (a) Crowding Out – Full Employment
Here IS is the original goods market curve and LM is the original Money market curve where the
simultaneous equilibrium is at the intersection of the two. Now if it is already at the full
37
employment Y* then with an increase in the government spending the IS curve shifts to the right
but because of the full employment output there is a corresponding increase in the rate of interest
that shifts the LM curve to the left. Thus there is hundred percent crowding out of private
investment as there is no actual change in the output.
Figure 4 (b) Crowding Out – Less than Full Employment
In case output is less than the full employment then an increase in the government spending
brings a simultaneous rightward parallel shift in the IS curve. Though government intended that
output would increase from Y1 to Y2 but in this process the real rate of interest increased and the
actual change in output is from Y1 to Y3. The reduction in private investment from Y2 to Y3
because of increase in the real rate of interest is known as partial crowding out.
Figure 4 (c) Crowding Out – Monetary Accommodation of Fiscal Expansion
38
The third case also known as monetizing fiscal deficits means printing of currency by the
government to finance its increased government expenditure. Thus there is rightward shift in the
IS as well as LM curve and no corresponding increase in the real rate of interest thus the
intended change in output and the actual change in output are equal with no crowding out.
3.6 SUMMARY
The previous chapter discussed about how goods market and money market are simultaneously
in equilibrium which is shown using the concept of Aggregate Demand curve which shows
inverse relation between price level and equilibrium level of output. The chapter further
discussed how changes in fiscal and monetary policy have an impact the real rate of interest in
the economy and hence the simultaneous equilibrium. There are three situations of crowding out
with it ranging from zero percent crowding out to full crowding out depending on the level of
output where the economy is operating that is at full employment, less than full employment.
There is also an extreme situation where government finances its spending by printing of
currency known as monetary accommodation of fiscal expansion.
3.7 SELF ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS
Check your progress
Exercise 1: True and False
(a) AD curve is a short run phenomenon.
(b) Crowding Out happens because of Monetary Policy.
(c) A two sector economy does not differentiate between Gross income and Disposable income.
(d) Fiscal policy refers to change in government expenditure or change in taxes.
(e) Monetizing Fiscal deficit is another name of Monetary Accommodation of Fiscal Expansion
(f) Aggregate demand curve shows relation between price level and equilibrium level of output.
(g) There is no crowding out when output is at full employment level.
(h) Fiscal multiplier shows change in simultaneous equilibrium because of change in government
expenditure.
Ans. 1(F), 2(F), 3(T), 4(T), 5(T), 6(T), 7(F), 8(T)
Exercise 2: Fill in the Blanks
(a) IS-LM is a _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _run phenomenon.
(b) Aggregate Demand shows relation between _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ and _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
(c) AD shows _ _ _ _ _ _ _ equilibrium.
39
(d) Crowding out shows _ _ _ _ _ _ _ in private investment.
(e) Monetary Policy means changes in _ _ _ _ _ _ .
(f) Monetary Accommodation of Fiscal Expansion means _ _ _ _ _ _ _ of currency to __ _ _ _ _
_ _ Government expenditure.
Ans 1. Short 2. Price Level and Equilibrium Level of Output 3. Simultaneous. 4. Decrease. 5.
Nominal Money Supply. 6 Printing of currency, finance.
Exercise 3: Questions
1.Explain the derivation of simultaneous equilibrium.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2. What is Crowding Out.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3. Explain derivation of Aggregate Demand Curve.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
4. How do monetary and Fiscal multipliers have an impact on the simultaneous
equilibrium.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
5. What happens when there is full employment in the economy and government
increases its purchases.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
6. Derive monetary and Fiscal multiplier mathematically.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
7.What happens when government increases its money supply to fund its additional
expenditure.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3.8 SUGGESTED READINGS
Mankiw, N. Gregory, Macro Economics, Macmillan Worth Publishers New York, Hampshire
U.K..
Dornbusch, Rudiger and Stanley, Fischer, Macro Economics Theory, McGraw-Hill
Barro Robert J., Macroeconomics Theory and Applications, MIT Press