unit 1-british law vs. us law · ii. 1. common law= the body of law based on judicial decisions and...

53
Unit 1-British Law vs. US Law I. The main sources of British law are common law, legislation and, more recently, European Community law. Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own legal system and lawcourts, distinct from those in England and Wales. A distinctive ancient British law is that of 'habeas corpus'. This Latin phrase literally means 'you must have the body', and is the opening words of a 17th- century writ guaranteeing a person a fair trial. A person who believes that he is being wrongly held by the police can issue a writ of habeas corpus to have his complaint heard by a court. This is also a part of the US Constitution. US law is based on English law and is represented by common law, statute law and the US Constitution. There are two types of court, state and federal, with each state having its own distinctive laws, courts and prisons. Federal law cases are first heard before a federal district judge in a district court presided over by a Chief Judge. Appeals are made to one of 13 Courts of Appeal or to the Supreme Court, the highest in the country. The federal legal system has its own police force, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). A sheriff in the USA is the chief law enforcement officer in a county, with the power of a police officer in the matter of enforcing criminal law. In England and Wales the sheriff is the principal officer of the Crown in a county, with mainly ceremonial duties. II. 1. common law= the body of law based on judicial decisions and custom, as distinct from statute law= drept comun 2. habeas corpus= a writ ordering a person to be brought before a court or judge, especially so that the court may ascertain whether his detention is lawful= habeas corpus 3. writ= a document under seal, issued in the name of the Crown or a court, commanding the person to whom it is addressed to do or refrain from doing some specified act= ordonanta, hotarare judecatoreasca 4. the prosecution= the institution and conduct of legal proceedings against a person= procuratura, acuzarea 5. defendant= a person against whom an action or claim is brought in a court of law= acuzat, inculpat, parat 6. the defence= the defendant and his legal advisers collectively= apararea 7. solicitor= lawyer who advises clients on matters of law, draws up legal documents, prepares cases for barristers, etc. and who may plead in certain courts= avocat insarcinat cu procedura, jurisconsult 8. barrister= a lawyer who has been called to the bar and is qualified to plead in the higher courts= avocat pledant 9. the Bar= all those who belong to the profession of barrister= Barou

Upload: others

Post on 01-Jan-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Unit 1-British Law vs. US Law

I. The main sources of British law are common law, legislation and, more recently, European Community law. Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own legal system and lawcourts, distinct from those in England and Wales. A distinctive ancient British law is that of 'habeas corpus'. This Latin phrase literally means 'you must have the body', and is the opening words of a 17th-century writ guaranteeing a person a fair trial. A person who believes that he is being wrongly held by the police can issue a writ of habeas corpus to have his complaint heard by a court. This is also a part of the US Constitution. US law is based on English law and is represented by common law, statute law and the US Constitution. There are two types of court, state and federal, with each state having its own distinctive laws, courts and prisons. Federal law cases are first heard before a federal district judge in a district court presided over by a Chief Judge. Appeals are made to one of 13 Courts of Appeal or to the Supreme Court, the highest in the country. The federal legal system has its own police force, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). A sheriff in the USA is the chief law enforcement officer in a county, with the power of a police officer in the matter of enforcing criminal law. In England and Wales the sheriff is the principal officer of the Crown in a county, with mainly ceremonial duties. II. 1. common law= the body of law based on judicial decisions and custom, as distinct from statute law= drept comun

2. habeas corpus= a writ ordering a person to be brought before a court or judge, especially so that the court may ascertain whether his detention is lawful= habeas corpus

3. writ= a document under seal, issued in the name of the Crown or a court, commanding the person to whom it is addressed to do or refrain from doing some specified act= ordonanta, hotarare judecatoreasca

4. the prosecution= the institution and conduct of legal proceedings against a person= procuratura, acuzarea

5. defendant= a person against whom an action or claim is brought in a court of law= acuzat, inculpat, parat 6. the defence= the defendant and his legal advisers collectively= apararea

7. solicitor= lawyer who advises clients on matters of law, draws up legal documents, prepares cases for barristers, etc. and who may plead in certain courts= avocat insarcinat cu procedura, jurisconsult 8. barrister= a lawyer who has been called to the bar and is qualified to plead in the higher courts= avocat pledant 9. the Bar= all those who belong to the profession of barrister= Barou

10. Inns of Court= the four private unincorporated societies in London (Lincoln's Inn, Inner Temple, Middle Temple, Gray's Inn) that function as a law school and have the exclusive privilege of calling candidates to the English Bar= cladiri londoneze apartinand la patru societati juridice

11. coroner= a public official responsible for the investigation of violent, sudden, or suspicious deaths= medic legist si procuror insarcinat cu cercetarea penala a deceselor suspecte

12. appeal= the judicial review by a superior court of the decision of a lower tribunal=apel, recurs

III. English equivalents for some Romanian expressions

1. a dovedi nevinovatia cuiva= to prove somebody guilty

2. a stabili un verdict= to reach a verdict 3. a pune in aplicare legea= to enforce the law

4. a comite o infractiune= to commit a crime

5. a fi actionat in justitie= to be brought to trial 6. a incalca legea= to break the law

7. a avea dreptul de a face un recurs/apel= to have the right of appeal 8. a fi supus unui interogatoriu (la un proces)= to stand trial 9. a ocoli legea= to get round the law

10. a fi in curs de judecare (dupa caz)= to be on trial 11. a actiona pe cale legala= to keep the right side of the law

Unit 2-British Law vs. US Law-Grammar

Choose the correct version, paying attention to the use of English tenses:

1. Judge Williams ........................ today as judge Thomson has been taken ill.

a) presides b) will preside c) is presiding d) presided

2. Before taking up his duty, each judge ............. an oath to respect his

responsabilities.

a) takes b) is taking c) took d) has taken

3. The members of the jury ....... now ................... on the murder case.

a) is __ deliberating b) were __ deliberating c) are __ deliberating

4. ............................ to represent yourself in the trial?

a) Will you b) Are you going c) You are going d) Will you be

5. Look out! One of the robbers .......................... .

a) will shoot b) is shooting c) was shooting d) is going to

shoot

6. I ....................... my solicitor tomorrow; I am changing my will.

a) am seeing b) will see c) see d) would see

7. As soon as I .............. from my lawyer, I will let you know.

a) will hear b) heard c) will have heard d) hear

8. You cannot enter this room. The witness ..................... cross examined right

this moment.

a) is being b) is c) will be d) has being

9. The coroner .......................... the case right now.

a) investigates b) is investigating c) will investigate d) has been

investigating

10. My client will make an appeal when the verdict ......... pronounced.

a) will be b) was c) has been d) is being

Match the English expressions in column A with their equivalent

Romanian translations in column B, using the glossary:

A B

to serve a sentence = a executa o sentinţă

1. to pronounce a sentence a. a comuta o pedeapsă

2. to be released on probation b. cu domiciliu forţat

3. to be taken into custody c. a fi eliberat pe cauţiune

4. to drop all the charges d. a suspenda o sentinţă

5. to commute a sentence e. a depune un jurământ

6. to be released on bail f. a renunţa la toate acuzaţiile

7. to take an oath g. a pronunţa o sentinţă

8. to suspend a sentence h. a urmări în justiţie

9. under house arrest i. a fi arestat

10. to bring to court j. a fi pus în libertate sub supraveghere

Match the verbal tenses in the left column with their corresponding

grammatical term; the first one has been done for you as an example:

Verbal tenses Corresponding grammatical term

is investigating Present Tense Continuous

1. will have prosecuted a. Past Tense Simple

2. has been protecting b. Past Perfect

3. was advising c. Present Tense Simple

4. had been examining d. Present Perfect Continuous

5. defended e. Future Tense Continuous

6. will dismiss f. Past Tense Continous

7. had robbed g. Past Perfect Continuous

8. have committed h. Future Tense Simple

9. will have been pleading i. Present Perfect

10. will be analysing j. Future Perfect Continuous

11. convicts k. Future Perfect

Put the verbs in brackets into the corresponding verbal tense indicated in

intalics:

1. I ………….. (see) my solicitor tomorrow. (Present Tense Continuous)

2. What …………you (think) about? (Present Tense Continuous) Why ……….

you (not talk) to me about your problems? (Present Tense Simple)

3. After deliberating for hours, the jury ………….. (decide) to declare the

defendant not guilty. (Present Perfect)

4. Why ………….. you (accept) to take this case if you consider your client to

be guilty? (Present Perfect)

5. Yesterday he ………. (come) into my office and ……… (ask) for my help. I

……… (tell) him that I would help him but he ………. (not seem) to trust

my words. (Past Tense Simple)

6. I ………….. (wait) for you in front of the cinema when I ……… (realize)

that somebody …………… (watch) me insistently. Soon after I ………..

(decide) to leave. (Past Tense Continuous and Past Tense Simple)

7. Judge Moony …………… (preside) in this court of law for more than ten

years. (Present Perfect Continuous) He ………… (retire) next

week. (Present Tense Continous)

8. The journalist …………. (not make) the story public until he ………….

(find) enough hard evidence to incriminate the suspect. (Past Tense Simple,

Past Perfect)

9. They …………… (work) together for five years when they ………… (find

out) that they ………….... (be married) to the same woman. (Past Perfect

Continuous, Past Tense Simple, Past Perfect)

10. By the time you ……….. (arrive) at the airport, his plane ……………

(land) for more than half an hour. (Present Tense Simple, Future Perfect)

11. When I ……….. (graduate) I was very determined to pursue a career in the

law field. (Past Tense Simple) But since then I ………….. (reconsider) my

options and I …………… (decide) to turn politician. (Present Perfect)

12. She …………... already (address) her appeal to the High Court of Justice in

London when she …………. (be summoned) to appear in the local court.

(Past Perfect, Past Tense Simple)

Unit 3-Forms of Punishment

I. When people are sent to prison in Britain after being found guilty of a crime, they are given a sentence that specifies the length of their punishment. Most, however, will be eligible for a remission of one third of the period stipulated. This means that a person sentenced to a year's imprisonment will normally be released after eight months, and one sentenced to three years will leave prison after two. Moreover, most prisoners sentenced to 12 months or more are also eligible for parole when they have served one third of the stated period, after a minimum of six month in prison. Although a 'life sentence' for murder rarely means imprisonment for life, it can last for 20 years or more if the crime was the murder of a police officer or prison officer, if it was carried out during a terrorist attack or a robbery, or if it involved the sexual or sadistic killing of a child. The government minister responsible for law and order, the Home Secretary, decides when a prisoner sentenced to life should be released. Such prisoners remain on parole for the rest of their lives, and may be imprisoned again if it seems likely that they will commit a further offence. On the whole, many courts try to avoid passing prison sentences in the first place, and instead impose some other punishment, such as a fine, or probation, or a community service order. A court may impose a prison sentence 'suspended' for up to two years: the offender will not have to serve the sentence unless he or she commits other offences during the period. Courts also have the power to allow a convicted person to go free, i.e. to discharge him or her conditionally, especially if imprisonment or other punishment seems inappropriate. If convicted for another offence of the same kind, however, such a person will be brought back to court and be liable for punishment that could have been imposed in the first place. II. State whether the following sentences are true or false and correct the false ones: 1. A person sentenced to three years will normally leave prison after two.

2. Most prisoners sentenced to 12 months are eligible for parole when they have served four moths of the stated period. 3. At present, one prisoner out of four obtain parole. 4. Prisoners sentenced to five or more years for serious offences are granted parole very often. 5. A 'life sentence' for murder can last for 20 years or more. 6. The High Court of Justice decides when a prisoner sentenced to life should be released. 7. Fines are awarded in about six cases out of ten. 8. 'Probation' involves that a probation officer will be living with the offender over the period of time estimated initially. 9. The number of hours that can be imposed for community service vary between 40 and 240 hours. 10. Irrespective of the number of hours, the community service has to be completed within one year. III. Choose the correct meaning of the following expressions selected from the above text: 1. "To be eligible for a remission" means: a. to deserve to be punished for a remission. b. to be worthy or unfit for a remission. c. to have the right or proper qualification for a remission.

2. "To be liable for punishment" means: a. to be legally obliged or responsible for something and be punished accordingly. b. to be suspected of an offence and be punished for it. c. to deserve a form of punishment. 3. "To observe a condition" (in the context of its use) means: a. to listen to a condition but not to respect it. b. to notice a condition carefully. c. to legally respect an official law. 4. "To carry out a crime" means: a. to bring to completion, to accomplish a crime. b. to be acquitted for a crime. c. to serve a sentence for committing a crime. 5. "To bind somebody over" means: a. to make sb. take an oath that he will respect the law. b. to warn sb. that he will appear in court again if he breaks the law. c. to punish sb. for breaking the law

IV. Match the following words and expressions with their Romanian translation:

1. crime a. condamnat 2. offender b. pedeapsa cu suspendare

3. remission c. delict, infractiune

4. parole d. incendiere premeditata

5. probation officer e. reducere de pedeapsa, gratiere

6. life sentence f. munca in interesul comunitatii 7. community service g. ofiter de politie insarcinat cu supravegherea unei persoane eliberate conditionat 8. convict h. condamnare pe viata

9. arson i. contravenient 10. suspended sentence j. eliberare conditionata

Unit 4-Forms of Punishment-Grammar

Choose the correct version:

1. Any witness shall take an oath that the .................. he/she is about to give shall

be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

a) confession b) testimony c) verdict d)

statement

2. To .................... means to go or intrude on the property, privacy, or preserves of

another with no right or permission.

a) trespass b) forge c) break in d) burgle

3. .................. is defined as giving or promising to give a public official something

of value with a corrupt intention to influence the official in the discharge of his or

her official duty.

a) Forgery b) Larceny c) Bribery d) Perjury

4. ..................... is the false making or altering of any document that either has

legal significance or is commonly relied upon in business transactions.

a) Deceit b) Smuggling c) Corruption d) Forgery

5. Since the defendant did not have a criminal record, he got away with a small

........... .

a) ransom b) punishment c) fine d) ticket

6. Many civilized countries have long abolished the death .................

a) penalty b) punishment c) conviction d) sentence

7. A threat of attack to another person, followed by actual attack which need

amount only to touching with hostile intent is called .....................

a) rape b) assault and battery c) threat d) vandalism

8. The defendant was able to prove his innocence at the trial and was .....................

.

a) absolved b) acquitted c) forgiven d) pardoned

9. The judge recommended more humane forms of punishment for juvenile

......................

a) convicts b) villains c) sinners d) delinquents

10. The police have to ................... the law, not to take it into their own hands.

a) press b) break c) force d) enforce

Choose the correct version, paying attention to the use of English tenses:

1. He ................... a solicitor for more than a year now.

a) was b) had been c) has been d) is

2. We ......................... for the verdict for almost two hours! There must be

something wrong.

a) are waiting b) were waiting c) waited d) have been waiting

3. She .................... released on bail last week.

a) has been b) was c) will be d) had been

4. ............ the jury .................. a verdict?

a) Have ... reached b) Has ... reached c) Had ... reached d)

Did .... reach

5. The leader of the gang ...... just ............ acquitted by the court of justice.

a) has...been b) had...been c) was...been d) is ...

6. He was placed under investigation only after they .............. hard evidence

against him.

a) found b) had found c) has found d) finded

7. His sentence was by far more severe than everybody ......................... .

a) expected b) was expecting c) had expected d) has expected

8. As soon as the jury .................. the verdict, the case was dismissed.

a) had pronounced b) pronounced c) has pronounced d)

pronounces

9. Everybody wondered why he ................. caught red-handed before.

a) hasn’t been b) wasn’t c) hadn’t been d) wouldn’t be

10. The members of the jury ................. for hours when they finally reached a

verdict.

a) were deliberating b) deliberated c) have been deliberating d)

had been deliberating

11. She told me that she ..................... filing for divorce for a long time.

a) considered b) had been considering c) would consider d) has been

considering

12. I ......................... in a court of law since my parents filed for a divorce.

a) wasn’t b) haven’t been c) won’t be d) hadn’t been

13. As soon as the search warrant ..................... they will be allowed to look for the

documents.

a) has been issued b) will be issued c) was issued d) had been

issued

14. ................ his criminal record ..................... to the slightest detail?

a) Was ___ checked b) Has ___ being checked c) Has ___ been

checked d) Would ___ been checked

15. The suspect ............... under investigation long before the police found

irrefutable evidence.

a) was placed b) has been placed c) had been placed

d) will be placed

Unit 5-The European Court of Justice

The reprezentatives of the member states did not by common accord agree on the seat of the Court until 1992, when they were empowered to do so by Article 216 EEC. As a result, they took the decision that the Court of Justice should remain in Luxembourg. This rooting of the Court in Luxembourg is one factor in helping to give the Court a strong esprit de corps. The Court of Justice consists of fifteen judges and nine advocates-general, who are

appointed by common accord of the governments of the member states for a

renewable term of six years. To be appointed to one of these offices a person has to

either possess the qualifications required for appointment to the highest judicial

offices in his or her respective countries or be jurisconsults of recognized

competence. Although in strict law the judges and advocates-general could be of

any nationality, in practice each member state will nominate one of its own

nationals as a judge, and the five largest states – France, Germany, Italy, Spain and

the United Kingdom – will each nominate an advocate-general. The remaining

advocates-general are appointed by the smaller member states in accordance with a

system of rotation. Belgium had an advocate-general from 1988 to 1994, Denmark

from 1991 to 1997, Greece from 1994 to 2000 and Ireland from 1995 to 2000. A

disadvantage of the rotation system is that no matter how outstanding the person is,

it is impossible for him or her to be reappointed at the end of six years.

An odd number of judges is maintained in order to allow the full court to sit and to

reach a majority decision. All decisions of the Court are signed by all the judges

whether they were in the minority or the majority, so it is impossible to know

whether the decision was reached by a bare majority or by unanimity.

The Council has the power, acting unanimously on a request from the Court, to

increase the number of judges and advocates-general. In the past the size of the

Court was expanded upon the accession of new member states, but not on other

occasions, to help it cope with extra business. The Court initially started with seven

judges, expanded to nine in 1973 (accession of Denmark, Ireland and the United

Kingdom), to eleven in 1981 (accession of Greece), to thirteen in 1986 (accession

of Spain and Portugal) and to fifteen in 1995 (accession of Austria, Finland and

Sweden).

The Court has coped with the increase in its workload in part by increasing the

number of cases that it handles in a chamber rather than by a plenary session. The

EEC Treaty always allowed the Court to form chambers consisting of three or five

judges, but originally insisted that cases brought before the Court by a member

state or by a community institution must be heard in plenary session.

The Court now has four chambers of three judges and two chambers of seven

judges. Each chamber has a president, who is elected annually, and it seems that by

convention the presidencies of the chambers rotate around all the judges apart from

the President of the Court.

(Adapted from EC Law. The Essential Guide to the Legal Workings of the

European Community, by Stephen Weatherill&Paul Beaumont)

I. Fill in the gaps with the missing words from the text:

1. Luxembourg is the seat of the actual ...................................... .

2. The members of the European Court of Justice are appointed by the

.................................................. .

3. ...................................... has the right to nominate one of its own nationals as

a judge.

4. Five advocates-general are appointed by .............................., while the other

four are appointed by ............................. .

5. The disadvantage of ........................ is that a member of the Court of Justice

cannot be reappointed at the end of six years.

6. How do we know whether a decision of the Court of Justice was reached by a

......................... or by unanimity?

7. The Council has the power to increase the number of

............................................. .

8. The right of the Court to form chambers was granted by the

.............................. .

9. The actual Court consists of .......................... of three judges and of

...................... of seven judges.

10. The president of a chamber is elected ........................, according to a

rotation system.

II. Ask questions for the following answers; the first two have been done for

you as examples:

Answer: In 1992

Question: When did the reprezentatives of the member states agree on the seat of

the Court?

Answer: Fifteen judges and nine advocates-general.

Question: How many judges and advocates-general does the Court of Justice

consist of ?

1. Answer: Six years.

Question:

_______________________________________________________

2. Answer: France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom.

Question:

_______________________________________________________

3. Answer: From 1988 to 1994.

Question:

_______________________________________________________

4. Answer: Denmark

Question:

_______________________________________________________

5. Answer: In order to allow the full court to sit and to reach a majority

decision.

Question:

_______________________________________________________

6. Answer: All the judges.

Question:

_______________________________________________________

7. Answer: Upon the accession of new member states.

Question:

_______________________________________________________

8. Answer: Seven.

Question:

_______________________________________________________

9. Answer: Austria, Finland and Sweden.

Question:

_______________________________________________________

10. Answer: Six chambers of judges.

Question:

_______________________________________________________

Read the following expressions and their equivalent Romanian translations

and then use them to complete the gapped sentences:

1. to be appointed to an office = 1. a fi numit într-o funcţie/poziţie

2. to be elected = 2. a fi ales

3. to sit = 3. a fi în şedinţă, a se întruni

4. to convene a meeting/session = 4. a convoca o întrunire/şedinţă

5. to convene a person before trial/ to

summon sb. =

5. a cita o persoană să se prezinte la

tribunal

6. to run for a post/an office = 6. a-şi depune candidatura pentru un

post/funcţie

7. to stand for Parliament = 7. a candida pentru Parlament

8. to dissolve Parliament = 8. a dizolva Parlamentul

9. to hear a case/a witness = 9. a audia un caz, un martor

10. to dismiss a case = 10. a declara un caz închis

1. The Minister of Justice is going to ................... presidency.

2. The debtor was .................... to appear before the magistrates.

3. The judges and advocates-general are .................. by the governments of the

member states.

4. The manager of the company has ................ an urgent meeting with the

shareholders.

5. James was ............... chairman by a majority of 25 voters.

6. The Court is now ................ in plenary session.

7. I do not think that his qualifications recommend him to ...................

Parliament.

8. This case is far too important to be ............... in a chamber.

9. Who has the authority to ............... Parliament?

10. The Court ............... the case due to lack of hard evidence.

Unit 6-The European Court of Justice-Verbal tenses

1. to be appointed to an office = 1. a fi numit într-o funcţie/poziţie

2. to be elected = 2. a fi ales

3. to sit = 3. a fi în şedinţă, a se întruni

4. to convene a meeting/session = 4. a convoca o întrunire/şedinţă

5. to convene a person before trial/ to

summon sb. =

5. a cita o persoană să se prezinte la

tribunal

6. to run for a post/an office = 6. a-şi depune candidatura pentru un

post/funcţie

7. to stand for Parliament = 7. a candida pentru Parlament

8. to dissolve Parliament = 8. a dizolva Parlamentul

9. to hear a case/a witness = 9. a audia un caz, un martor

10. to dismiss a case = 10. a declara un caz închis

1. The Minister of Justice is going to ................... presidency.

2. The debtor was .................... to appear before the magistrates.

3. The judges and advocates-general are .................. by the governments of the member states.

4. The manager of the company has ................ an urgent meeting with the shareholders.

5. James was ............... chairman by a majority of 25 voters.

6. The Court is now ................ in plenary session.

7. I do not think that his qualifications recommend him to ................... Parliament.

8. This case is far too important to be ............... in a chamber.

9. Who has the authority to ............... Parliament?

10. The Court ............... the case due to lack of hard evidence.

Choose the correct version, looking the new words up in the Glosarry:

1. She will soon ................. trial for the part she played in the recent

robbery.

a) give b) perform c) make d) stand

2. Detectives are said to be ....................... into the causes of the recent

fire.

a) looking b) investigating c) checking d) searching

3. The victim ............... the law into her own hands by killing her attacker.

a) took b) seized c) grabbed d) put

4. Ted Bundy was a hardened criminal who showed no .................. for

his crimes.

a) penance b) pity c) remorse d) reproach

5. His sentence has been commuted to six months on the ................ of

failing health.

a) bases b) causes c) grounds d) reasons

6. He was convicted to 10 years of prison and ................. of his property.

a) confiscated b) denied c) removed d) deprived

7. If you can’t resolve the dispute, it will have to be settled

by.......................

a) arbitration b) court c) election d) referee

8. All his friends thought he was guilty, but no one could ................

anything against him.

a) accuse b) ensure c) point d) prove

9. As the result of a police ............. on the disco, twenty teenagers were

arrested.

a) invasion b) raid c) intrusion d) entry

10. As he didn’t have a criminal ............., the judge sentenced him to 50

hours of community work.

a) case b) file c) record d) dossier

Choose the correct version, paying attention to the use of English tenses:

1. By the time you reach the Court, he ........................... released on bail.

a) had been b) will have been c) has been d)

was

2. While the people ......................... for the verdict, the judge was talking

to the defendant about the weather.

a) had been waiting b) are waiting c) were waiting d)

wait

3. Right now I think I am ....................... . Come and pick me up!

a) followed b) being followed c) been followed d)

following

4. He ....................... down a street near his home when he was

kidnapped.

a) walked b) was walking c) had been walking d)

is walking

5. One of the kidnappers ................ to kill him while they were driving

away.

a) threatens b) threteaned c) is threatening d) had

threthened

6. How long ago ....... you .......... an appeal?

a) did ... made b) had ...made c) did ... make d) were

... made

7. I saw you yesterday, while you ................... that famous criminal.

a) were defending b) defended c) had been defending

d) defending

8. The witnesses were still being heard when I ............. the court of law.

a) left b) leaved c) was leaving d) had left

9. She told me that she ..................... filing for divorce for a long time.

a) considered b) had been considering c) would consider d) has been

considering

10. This time tomorrow they .................... the witness.

a) will cross-examine b) would cross-examine c) will be cross-

examining d) are cross-examining

11. By the end of this year he ........................ ten years in prison.

a) will be spending b) will spend c) will have spent d) has

spent

12. We knew that the defendant .............. to do such a thing.

a) will never be able b) are never able c) would never be able d) can

never

13. They said that the new constitution ....................... soon.

a) would be voted b) will be voted c) would vote d) is voted

14. By this time next year, he ..................... his prison sentence.

a) would have served b) will have served c) will

serve d) is serving

15. The criminal ....................... to trial if there is enough evidence

against him.

a) would be brought b) will have been brought c) will be

brought d) was brought

Unit 8-Institutions of the Community-Legal Collocations

Institutions of the Community

Section 4 – The Court of Justice

Article 170

A Member State which considers that another Member State has failed to fulfil an

obligation under this Treaty may bring the matter before the Court of Justice.

Before a Member State brings an action against another Member State for an

alleged infringement of an obligation under this Treaty, it shall bring the matter

before the Commission.

The Commission shall deliver a reasoned opinion after each of the States

concerned has been given the opportunity to submit its own case and its

observations on the other party’s case both orally and in writing.

If the Commission has not delivered an opinion within three months of the date

on which the matter was brought before it, the absence of such opinion shall not

prevent the matter from being brought before the Court of Justice.

Article 171

1. If the Court of Justice finds that a Member State has failed to fulfil an obligation under this Treaty, the State shall be required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgement of the Court of Justice.

2. If the Commission considers that the Member State concerned has not taken such measures it shall, after giving that State the opportunity to submit its observations, issues a reasoned opinion specifying the points on which the Member State concerned has not complied with the judgement of the Court of Justice. If the Member State concerned fails to take the necessary measures to

comply with the Court’s judgement within the time-limit laid down by the

Commission, the latter may bring the case before the Court of Justice. In so

doing it shall specify the amount of the lump sum or penalty payment to be

paid by the Member State concerned which it considers appropriate in the

circumstances.

If the Court of Justice finds that the Member State concerned has not

complied with its judgement it may impose a lump sum or penalty payment

on it.

This procedure shall be without prejudice to Article 170.

(Blackstone’s EC Legislation, Edited by Nigel G.

Foster)

I. Match the new expressions (from the text above) in column A with their

Romanian equivalents in column B:

A B

1. to fulfil an obligation = a. a nu prejudicia

2. to bring a matter before = b. a împiedica/a nu permite

3. to bring an action against sb. = c. a prevedea/stabili/specifica

4. an alleged infringement of an

obligation =

d. a îndeplini o obligaţie

5. to deliver a reasoned opinion = e. a impune o plată forfetară sau o

amendă

6. to be given the opportunity = f. a se conforma/a respecta

7. to submit a case to = g. a supune o problemă atenţiei

8. to prevent smth. from + v-ing = h. a transmite o opinie întemeiată

9. to comply with = i. a intenta un proces cuiva

10. to lay (laid, laid) down = j. a supune un caz spre examinare

11. to impose a lump sum or a penalty

payment =

k. o presupusă încălcare/violare a unei

obligaţii

12. to be without prejudice to = l. a i se da şansa

II. Complete the following sentences with logical and correct phrases; the first

one has been done for you:

Example: If he refuses to fulfil his obligation, he ………………………………..

If he refuses to fulfil his obligation, he will have to be fired

immediately.

1. I think that you …………………………………. before bringing this matter before the Court of justice.

2. If my neighbour ……………………………………………, I shall bring an action against him.

3. The infringement of copy-right ………………………………………….. .

4. After hearing his reasoned opinion, we…………………………………………………

5. All I need is to be given the opportunity to ……………………………………………

6. What ……………………………………………. in order to submit this case to your commission?

7. The new legislation prevented him from ……………………………………………….

8. You have to ……………………………………….. to comply with the second clause in our contract.

9. According to article 170, laid down by the …………………………………………….

10. Which is the heaviest penalty that …………………………………………………….

11. Make sure that you respect the law, without any prejudice to ……………………….

III. Form collocations (regular combinations of words) by filling in the following

collocational grids; check the correctness of collocations using a legal dictionary:

breach (of) = infracţiune, violare, încălcare (a unei convenţii)

violation (of) = violare, abuz, încălcare, contravenire (la o regulă)

infringement of = infracţiune, violare, abuz, încălcare, reproducere ilicită

to break = a încălca (legea), a nu respecta

contract copy-

right

a

treaty

(the) peace trust sb’s

privacy

promise

breach of

violation of

infringement

of

to break

(a/an)

the

highway

code

law human

rights

patent

s

confidence sb’s

liberty

protocol

breach of

violation of

infringement

of

to break

(a/an)

IV. Choose from the collocations in exercise III. the English equivalents for the

following and then use them in your own sentences:

abuz de încredere = ________________

încălcarea ordinii publice = ________________

violarea secretului = __________________

reproducere ilicită a dreptului de autor = _____________________________

reproducere ilicită de brevete = _______________________________

Unit 9-Institutions of the Community-Modal Verbs

Choose the correct version, looking the new words up in the Glossary:

1. The woman sitting in the witness ............ will certainly commit perjury.

a) box b) stand c) seat d) bench

2. A .............. will be appointed to investigate the violent and suspicious death of

the teenager.

a) prosecutor b) doctor c) coroner d) judge

3. He was caught ..................... stealing money from the cash-box.

a) red-handed b) heavy-handed c) light-fingered d) heavy-set

4. You can’t have burgled the house alone, so who was your ............... ?

a) ally b) accomplice c) assistant d) associate

5. Wilkinson is alleged to have ................... a number of serious crimes.

a) done b) made c) committed d) discharged

6. ‘I object, Your Honour, the lawyer is ................. the witness!’

a) harassing b) intimidating c) offending d) leading

7. The man jumped out of the window and committed ................

a) death b) homicide c) murder d) suicide

8. The police said there was no sign of a .......... entry even though the house

had been burgled.

a) broken b) burst c) forced d) smashed

9. He was placed ............ house arrest for his own safety.

a) on b) in c) under d) within

10. Is the defendant going to ............ guilty or not guilty?

a) plead b) play c) appeal d) appear

11. Mr. Johnson was ............... fifty pounds for drinking and driving.

a) charged b) fined c) ordered d) penalized

12. As it was her first offence, the judge gave her a ............... sentence.

a) kind b) lenient c) severe d) tolerant

13. I ............... to say anything unless I am allowed to speak to my lawyer.

a) deny b) neglect c) refuse d) resist

14. The new harassment law comes into ............... on September 15.

a) force b) condition c) date d) power

15. He was charged .............. assault and battery and taken to prison.

a) of b) with c) on d) in

Choose the correct version, paying attention to the use of Modal Verbs:

1. Judges ............ never take bribe from the defendants.

a) should b) must c) can d) will

2. The window is broken; the intruder ............... tried to get into their bedroom.

a) can have b) should have c) would have d) must have

3. He was innocent! They ................. have taken him into custody!

a) shouldn’t b) mustn’t c) needn’t d) can’t

4. He ................ have committed the crime! He was immobilized in bed at that

time!

a) mustn’t b) couldn’t c) wouldn’t d) shouldn’t

5. I am sorry you didn’t ask for help; I ....................... introduced you to my lawyer.

a) can’t have b) must have c) could have d) was able

to

6.The legislation says that the judges ........................ immune from legal

proceedings.

a) shall be b) will be c) should be d) must be

7.A judge ................... of his office if he no longer fulfils the legal conditions.

a) can be deprive b) must deprive c) may be deprived d) may been

deprived

8. This procedure ........... be without prejudice to Article 170.

a) will b) shall c) must d) can

9. You ……………… submitted the case to a higher court! The verdict was in your

favour!

a) couldn’t have b) mustn’t have c) needn’t have d) may not

10.Any Member State .......... comply with the judgements of the European Court

of Justice.

a) shall b) must c) will d) have to

The main functions of Modal Verbs have been indicated in the box below.

Identify each function illustrated in the following sentences:

present /past ability inability possibility remote possibility

impossibility permission obligation absence of obligation necessity

prohibition logical assumption (affirmative) logical assumption (negative)

advice criticism requests offers suggestions regulations

Example:

The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in any dispute between Member States.

→ regulations

1. The parties to the proceedings may appeal to the Court of justice. → ____________

2. He couldn’t testify against an innocent man. → ______________ 3. I need to find a very good lawyer to get me out of prison. →

_______________ 4. He couldn’t have been convicted to capital punishment; he was just a

pickpocket. → _____________ 5. The Home Secretary must have advised the Queen on that important

matter. → ___________ 6. He should have asked for legal aid when he needed it. → _______________ 7. Can you tell me what papers I have to fill in ? → ________________ 8. You should bring him to trial before he commits more criminal acts. →

__________ 9. Shall I assist you in this matter? → _________________

10. We should all vote for or against this new provision. → _________________

11. May I be excused now ? → ________________ 12. He might have tried to bribe the judge, but I doubt it. →

________________ 13. Both parties have to respect the binding agreements of this contract. →

____________ 14. She can’t have broken her promise to give herself in. → _______________ 15. The young lawyer was able to come up with a new idea to rest his case. →

________ 16. The members of the jury don’t have to recess for deliberation if the verdict

is obvious. → _______________ 17. You mustn’t smoke in hospitals and airports. → _______________

Unit 10-Daily Telegraph I

I. Read the following texts and choose the corresponding headline for each

of them:

12 years for thief who left £7m IOU

Valentine killer given life in jail

Life sentence for double rapist

Pc faces jail for sex assaults

__________________________

A financial adviser who stole £10 million from 84 mainly elderly private

investors and the Halifax bank to feed his gambling habit was jailed for 12

years yesterday.

Graham Price, 58, of Llansamlet, near Swansea, an agent for the Halifax and a

consultant, was caught when the IOU for £7 million he had left in a safe was

found. He admitted 43 theft charges.

Swansea Crown Court was told that Price told detectives he believed he

needed one more week of gambling on horses to get the money back.

Note: IOU – (abbr of I owe you) = signed paper acknowledging that one owes the sum of money

stated

Crown Court = a court of criminal jurisdiction holding sessions in towns throughout England and

Wales at which circuit judges hear and determine cases

__________________________

A policeman who used his warrant card to lure women into his car so he could

sexually assault them was warned yesterday that he faced prison.

Amir Butt, 24, of Watford, offered a lift home to women who had been

drinking and become separated from their friends. He was found guilty on two

charges of sexual assault at Luton Crown Court and will be sentenced at a later

date.

Note: Pc – abbr of police constable (policeman)

__________________________

A former soldier became a rapist after service in the Gulf war changed his

personality, a court was told yesterday.

Lee Walker, 32, of Wythenshawe, Manchester, was jailed for life at Minshull

Street Crown Court after pleading guilty to rape. He was sentenced to five

years for a second case of rape.

__________________________

A man who murdered his fiancée after a row over doing the laundry was told

yesterday that he would serve at least 16 years in prison.

Paul Dyson, 31, was given a life sentence for what a judge described as the

“unspeakably evil deed” of strangling Joanne Nelson, 22, on the eve of St

Valentine’s Day, in Hull.

He dumped her body 100 miles away before making tearful television appeals

for her to get in touch.

Hull Crown Court heard that Dyson slashed his wrists and wrote “sorry” in

blood on his cell wall three days ago.

Passing sentence, Judge Tom Cracknell told Dyson: “You executed a well

thought-out plan without pity, except self pity, without remorse.”

The judge said the television appeal was “breathtaking and nauseating

hypocrisy”, adding: “You led her family to think there might be some hope

when there was none.”

Miss Nelson’s body was found after 39 days.

(The Daily Telegraph, Wednesday, November

9, 2005)

II. Say whether the following statements are true (T) or false (F); when the

sentences are false, correct them as in the following example:

Example: Lee Walker was sentenced to 12 years for two cases of rape. F

CORRECTION: Lee Walker was sentenced to five years for a second case of

rape.

1. Paul Dyson was given a life sentence for a double rape. __ 2. Amir Butt was a 24-year-old policeman who sexually assaulted women in

his car. __ 3. Graham Price stole £15 million from 84 mainly elderly private investors. __ 4. Lee Walker was a former soldier fighting in the Gulf war. __ 5. Paul Dyson committed suicide in prison, after he was convicted. __ 6. When brought before justice, Graham Price rejected all theft charges. __ 7. Amir Butt offered a lift home to women who left their office too late to

catch the bus. __ 8. Paul Dyson’s fiancée was called Joanne Nelson and was 22 yeards old. __ 9. Paul Dyson killed his fiancée on Christmas Eve, by stabbing her to death. __ 10. Graham Price had no connection whatsoever with the Halifax bank. __ 11. Paul Dyson appeared on TV and offered a generous ransom for his

fiancée’s possible kidnappers. __ 12. Amir Butt used his warrant card to lure women into his car. __ 13. Graham Price was caught when his IOU for £7 million was found in a safe.

__ 14. Judge Tom Cracknell congratulated Dyson on his well thought-out plan of

murdering his fiancée in cold blood. __ 15. Graham Price became a bank robber because he needed money for his

fiancée’s surgery. __

III. Pair-work: Take turns in answering your colleague’s questions by scanning

the texts for information:

1. Who was Graham Price and what was he charged with?

2. What jail sentence did Graham Price receive?

3. What did Graham Price need the stolen money for?

4. How old was Amir Butt and what did he do?

5. What was Amir Butt found guilty of?

6. How did Lee Walker plead when he stood trial?

7. What sentence did Lee Walker receive?

8. How did Paul Dyson dispose of his fiancée’s body?

9. How did Paul Dyson die?

10. When was Miss Nelson’s body found?

Remember the Passive Voice

IV. Read the chart below to see how the active to passive transformation

works for the main verbal tenses:

VERBAL TENSES ACTIVE VOICE PASSIVE VOICE

Present Tense Simple charge am/is/are charged

Present Tense

Continuous

is/are examining is/are being examined

Past Tense Simple sentenced was/were sentenced

Past Tense

Continuous

was/were interrogating was/were being interrogated

Present Perfect has/have found has/have been found

Past Perfect had released had been released

Future Tense Simple will/shall include will/shall be included

Future Perfect will/shall have admitted will/shall have been admitted

Conditional would reject would be rejected

Perfect Conditional would have arrested would have been arrested

Gerund practising being practised

Long Infinitive to convict to be convicted

Perfect Infinitive to have committed to have been committed

V. Put the verbs in brackets into the passive voice of the tense indicated:

Example: A value added tax (VAT) rate of 25 per cent ....................... (apply – Past

Tense Simple) to wine in Belgium.

A value added tax (VAT) rate of 25 per cent was applied to wine in Belgium.

1. This case …………………. (decide – Present Perfect) against Belgium. 2. The notion of protection ………………… (illustrate – Future Tense Simple) in

the next paragraph. 3. A charge that ……………. (catch – Present Tense Simple) by Article 12 is

unlawful. 4. The matter ……………. (judge – Past Tense Simple) in the light of Article 95.

5. The repayment to an exporter of a sum exceeding the internal duty ……………… (prohibit – Present Tense Simple) by Article 96.

6. Taxing exports at a lower rate than domestic products ………………. (consider – Present Perfect) a discriminatory practice.

7. The terms of the contract ….. already………………… (discuss – Past Perfect) before the two parties signed it.

8. The main witnesses in the murder case ……… still …………………….. (hear – Past Tense Continous) by the judge when the politician made a press release.

9. The two diplomats ….. now ………………. (escort – Present Tense Continous) to the American Embassy.

10. Six bomb attacks seem …………………… (report – Perfect Infinitive) in London for the last 10 hours.

11. A new warning ……………………. (issue – Future Tense Simple) for the refugees to leave the camp immediately.

12. More funds ……………………. (allocate – Perfect Conditional) to the Ministry of Justice if the government had voted the new budget law.

VI. Change the following sentences from Active Voice into Passive Voice; the

underlined direct objects will become the subjects of the passive sentences:

Example:

This Article entitles the holder of intellectual property rights to financial

compensations.

The holder of intellectual property rights is entitled to financial compensations

by this Article.

1. They all considered that the Court of First Instance had used Article 86 improperly.

They all considered that Article 86 ……………………………… by …………………

2. The Court will take measures to reconcile the incompatibility of national property rights with the pursuit of economic integration.

Measures

…………………..............................................................................................

3. Smith Drug Pharmaceuticals had patented a drug called Negram under British law.

A drug called Negram .............................. under British law by ………………………

4. The Commission rejected this Article on the grounds of unjustified discrimination.

This Article …………….. by ………………………………………………………….

5. The members of the Jury were still deliberating upon the matter of reasonable doubt.

The matter of reasonable doubt …… still ………………………. by ……………………

6. The client has just dropped all charges against the advertising agency that did not respect its deadlines.

All charges ........................... ………………………………………………………………

7. Any lawyer grants the benefit of the doubt even to a hardened criminal. The benefit of the doubt ……………………………………………………………………

Even a hardened criminal …………………………………………………………………..

8. The Court dismissed your appeal due to lack of further evidence. Your appeal ………………………………………………………………………………...

9. The members of the family will definitely contest this will. This will ………………………………………… by …………………………………..

10. They wouldn’t have closed that controversial file if they had found at least one eye witness to testify.

That controversial file ……………………………… if at least one eye witness ………..

……………………………….

VII. Choose the correct version by paying attention to the use of Passive

Voice:

1. Many houses in this area …………… into by burglars. a) have been being broken b) have been broken c) are been broken

d) have being broken

2. A photofit picture of the wanted man ....................... last week. a) had been issued b) was issuing c) was issued d) has been issued

3. After the verdict ............................., the case ............................ by the judge.

a) had been pronounced, was dismissed b) will be pronounced, will be dismissed c) will have been pronounced, has been dismissed d) has being pronounced, will be dismissed

4. He ........ just ........................ with sexual assault on a six-year-old boy. a) was.....charged b) had......been charged c) has......been charged d) has

...... be charged

5. He ........................... to 100 hours of community work only because he was at his first offence.

a) have been sentenced b) was sentenced b) will be

sentenced d) had being sentenced

6. Before ........................ of breach of trust, the lawyer ....... also ....................... with perjury in a divorce case.

a) been accused, was ..... charged b) being accuse, has ..... been charged c) being accused, had .... been charged d) being accused, was .... been charged

7. Choose the correct passive form of the following active sentence: The Commission has just appointed the new President of the European Court of Justice.

a) The new President of the European Court of Justice had just been appointed by the Commission.

b) The new President has just been appointed by the European Court of Justice.

c) The Commission has just been appointed to vote the new President of the European Court of Justice.

d) The new President of the European Court of Justice has just been appointed by the Commission.

8. Choose the correct passive form of the following active sentence: The members of the European Parliament were still debating the issue of competition law at that point.

a) The issue of competition law was still debated at that point by the members of the European Parliament.

b) The issue of competition law was still debating at that point the members of the European Parliament.

c) The issue of competition law was still being debated at that point by the members of the European Parliament.

d) The members of the European Parliament were still being debated by the issue of competition law.

9. Choose the correct English translation for the following Romanian passive sentence: Nu s-a ajuns încă la nici o concluzie cu privire la noua lege a adopţiei.

a) No conclusion hasn’t yet been reached regarding the new adoption law. b) No conclusion has yet been reached regarding the new adoption law. c) No conclusion was reached yet regarding the new adoption law.

d) Yet, no conclusion is reached regarding the new adoption law.

Unit 11-Daily Telegraph II

Iraqi jailed over British aid worker killing

1. Life in prison for the abetter of Margaret Hassan’s kidnappers

C

An Iraqi man has been sentenced to life in prison in connection with the

murder of Margaret Hassan, the British aid worker abducted and killed in Iraq

in 2004. Mustafa Salman was charged with aiding and abetting the kidnappers.

Two other defendants in the case were freed.

2.

The judge said Salman had received a plastic bag from an associate who asked

him to hold on to it. Four months later Iraqi security forces raided Salman's

home and found Mrs Hassan's purse and documents in the bag.

3.

Today's sentence is the first handed down in connection with the abduction or

killing of a foreign-born civilian in Iraq. More than 200 foreigners and

thousands of Iraqis have been kidnapped since the US-led invasion in 2003,

and over 40 have been killed.

4.

Born in Dublin, 59-year-old Mrs Hassan had British, Irish and Iraqi nationality

and had lived in Iraq for 30 years with her Iraqi husband.The CARE

International head was taken hostage in October 2004 while travelling to work

in Baghdad. She appeared in a video appealing for the British forces to

withdraw from Iraq, but was killed just under a month later. Her body has

never been found, and no group has claimed responsibility for her death.

5.

Her family has implored Foreign Secretaries Jack Straw and Margaret Beckett,

as well as the Foreign Office, to question the suspects about the location of

Mrs Hassan's remains."They have refused this request even though this is the

only way that Margaret's remains will be found and we can bring her home to

be buried with the dignity she deserves," they said.

6.

Yesterday her family said that, during her captivity, the kidnappers made four

calls to her Iraqi husband Tahseen in Baghdad, demanding to speak to a

member of the British Embassy. But the British told him they would not speak

to the hostage-takers.The Foreign Office confirmed that Mrs Hassan's husband

was called from her phone by someone claiming to be holding her, but said

they had been unable to confirm the claims.

7.

Deidre, Geraldine, Kathryn and Michael Fitzsimons said in a statement

released yesterday: "We believe that the refusal by the British Government to

open a dialogue with the kidnappers cost our sister her life."

8.

During her kidnap, in which video recordings of her pleading for her life were

released, officials were keen to distance her from the British Government and

emphasise her charity work in Iraq. Our strategy was one of 'personalisation

and localisation', minimising the links between Mrs Hassan and the UK," a

Foreign Office spokesman said." We understand her family having criticisms of

the Government approach and we remain in regular contact with them."

(The Daily Telegraph, Monday, June 5,

2006)

I. Choose from A to H the sentence that best summarises each paragraph (1-

8) of the article above and insert them in the boxes preceding each

paragraph. The first one has been done for you:

A. Justice at work – the first sentence against an Iraqi hostage-taker

B. The British Embassy refuses any communication with Iraqi hostage-

takers.

C. Life in prison for the abetter of Margaret Hassan’s kidnappers

D. The British Government’s strategy of assuming political distance

E. Finding evidence against Mustafa Salman

F. Iraqi citizen killed due to her British nationality?

G. Margaret Hassan’s family blame the British Government for her death.

H. The British authorities fail to comfort the grieved family.

II. For questions 1-5, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits

best according to the test; sometimes more than one option may be valid:

1. Why did Mustafa Salman keep Margaret Hassan’s purse and documents in

his house?

A. He wanted to ask Margaret’s family for a ransom.

B. The purse contained valuable possessions that he intended to sell.

C. Margaret Hassan’s purse and documents had been placed under his care.

D. Mustafa’s associates threatened to kill him if he didn’t take them.

2. Why was Margaret Hassan allowed to appear in a video?

A. Her appeals might have determined the British forces to withdraw from

Iraq.

B. The hostage-takers wanted to offer a proof of life to her family.

C. The hostage-takers wanted to negociate a ransom with the British

Government.

D. That was the last chance she had to save her life.

3. Why did the kidnappers make contact with her Iraqi husband?

A. They wanted to negociate the ransom for Margaret’s release.

B. They needed an intermediary to establish a contact with the British

Embassy.

C. They wanted Margaret’s family to put some pressure on the British

Government.

D. They wanted to put Margaret’s future execution down to the British

Government.

4. Why did the British Government refuse to open a dialogue with the

kidnappers?

A. The British Government no longer considered Margaret Hassan a British

citizen.

B. The British Government didn’t want to give in to an Iraqi technique of

political manipulation.

C. The British Government chose to distance itself from any acts of Iraqi

terrorism.

D. Opening a dialogue with the kidnappers meant withdrawing military

forces from Iraq.

5. Margaret’s family criticisms of the British Government approach were

directed at …

A. the British Government refusal to pay the ransom requested by the

kidnappers.

B. the British Government strategy of minimising the links between Mrs

Hassan and the UK.

C. the British Government refusal to open a dialogue with the kidnappers.

D. the British Government refusal to withdraw the military forces from Iraq.

III. Match the linking words/phrases in column A with their corresponding

parts in column B:

A B

1. According to the latest statistics,

a. … more measures will be taken in

convicting terrorists.

2. Due to the hard evidence found

in his house, …

b. to open dialogues with the

kidnappers of their citizens.

3. Up to a point, the kidnappers

seemed interested in …

c. … more than 200 foreigners and

thousands of Iraqis have been

kidnapped and over 40 killed since the

US-led invasion in 2003.

4. As a general rule, the

Government is not supposed …

d. … there should be some hidden

political agenda related to his/her

kidnapping.

5. Despite the fact that Margaret’s

appeals could have been her last, …

e. … Mustafa Salman could be taken

into police custody.

6. To put it briefly, … f. … the British Government didn’t take

any military or political action.

7. I am inclined to believe that from

now on, …

g. … but a terrorist way of negociating

military and political issues.

8. The hostage-takers didn’t obtain

what they wanted, consequently, …

h. … establishing a contact with the

British Embassy.

9. It is my firm belief that hostage-

taking is nothing …

i. … Margaret was another vitctim of

Iraqi terrorism.

10. That is to say, if a citizen of a

certain nationality is kidnapped, …

j. … they executed the useless hostage.

IV. Choose the correct preposition:

1.Terrorists resort ….. violence as a political weapon.

a) at b) to c) on d) into

2. The unknown foreigner carried …. a bombing in the centre of Paris.

a) out b) in c) round d) on

3. How should Governments deal …… terrorist attacks?

a) on b) without c) with d) about

4. The Iraqi citizen had been suspected …. many offences before.

a) about b) in c) with d) of

5. Who was held responsible …. the journalist’s death?

a) for b) of c) about d) on

6. The home-made bomb may have been destined ….. the recruits.

a) to b) for c) at d) upon

7. The Palestinian blew himself …. in a crowded bus.

a) out b) in c) up d) against

8. The terrorist attack coincided ….. an important religious celebration.

a) with b) to c) on d) into

9. The attack, attributed …. a new terrorist group, had many casulties.

a) with b) on c) to d) up to

10. How can the government prevent journalists …… endangering their lives?

a) for b) to c) against d) from

11. I am sure that this is one of the exceptions …… the rule.

a) of b) to c) from d) with

12. The Ministry of Defence has laid ….. strict procedures for this kind of

situation.

a) on b) down c) up d) out

13. Quite ……… from this problem, can such tests predict what the future holds

in store for us?

a) aside b) apart c) away d) out

14. I generally agree …. you, but I strongly object ….. your behaving so rudely.

a) to, to b) with, to b) to, at d) with, with

1. He pleaded guilty ….. manslaughter after trying to escape from police custody.

a) of b) to c) against d) for

2. The lorry belonged …. an ex-convict that rented land on Smiths Farm, in Northolt, west London.

a) with b) to c) of d) in

17. Both men were meant to be ……. surveillence at the time of the killing.

a) on b) above c) under d) below

18. Another person at the scene said that children were ……. the hostages

taken by the gunmen.

a) between b) among c) within d) inside

19. This prisoner is not ….. our jurisdiction. We have to call the district

authorities.

a) above b) below c) under d) on

20. He draws evidence for his claim ….. Court history.

a) from b) out of c) within d) with

Unit 12-Home Confinement

Home confinement

Arrested and charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to

distribute, William, a 30-year-old man with a history of substance abuse, awaits his "day in court," which is 3 months away.

Meanwhile, William must remain at home, except for a few select activities.

During the week, he leaves the house for his job as a welder at precisely 7 a.m.

and returns home no later than 5 p.m. He attends the 7 p.m. meeting of

Narcotics Anonymous at the local library every Thursday. He grocery shops at

2 p.m. every Saturday and goes to church –always attending the 10 a.m. service – every Sunday.

William is not just on a rigid schedule, he is under home confinement. Instead

of sending him to jail, the court decided to release him to the community on the

condition that he remain at home except for certain approved activities. His

presence in his home and his absences from it are monitored electronically by an ankle bracelet he wears 24 hours a day.

A Supervision Tool

Home confinement is a tool that helps U.S. probation and pretrial services

officers supervise, or monitor, defendants and offenders in the community. In the federal courts, home confinement is not a sentence in and of itself but

may be a condition of either probation, parole, supervised release, or pretrial

release. A person placed under home confinement is confined to his or her

residence, usually linked to an electronic monitoring system, and required to

maintain a strict daily activity schedule. When the person is allowed to leave

home, and for what reasons, is determined case by case.

Home confinement's purpose depends on the phase of the criminal justice

process in which it is used. In all cases, it is a means to restrict a person's

activity and to protect the public from any threat the person may pose. In

pretrial cases, home confinement is an alternative to detention used to ensure

that defendants appear in court. In post-sentence cases, home confinement is

used as a punishment, viewed as more punitive than regular supervision but less

restrictive than imprisonment. Courts may use home confinement as a sanction

for persons who violate the conditions of their supervision. Also, the Federal

Bureau of Prisons may use it for inmates released to serve the last part of their

sentence under the supervision of U.S. probation officers.

Officers screen defendants and offenders to determine eligibility for the home

confinement program. Certain categories of serious or repeat offenders are not

allowed to participate. Prior criminal record, history of violence, and medical

and mental health conditions and needs are factors that officers carefully

consider. Previous failures on supervision, risk to the public that the person

presents, third-party risk (such as previous incidents of domestic violence in the

household), and the person's willingness to participate are considerations as

well.

Close supervision by officers is a crucial component of the home confinement

program. The officer's job is demanding, time consuming, and sometimes

dangerous. It requires frequent phone calls to make sure participants are

adhering to their approved schedules; frequent unannounced, face-to-face visits;

and 24-hour, 7-day response to alerts from the monitoring center.

I. Make sure you understand the meaning of the legal terms in column A

by matching them with their definitions in column B:

A B

1. probation a. The release of a person who has been arrested and

charged with a federal crime while he or she awaits trial;

a pretrial services officer supervises the person in the

community until he or she returns to court.

2. parole b. One of a number of people living together, especially

in a hospital, prison or some other institution.

3. supervised

release

c. The penalty laid down in a law for contravention of its

provisions.

4. pretrial release d. Custody or confinement, especially of a suspect

awaiting trial.

5. detention e. Instead of sending an individual to prison, the court

releases the person to the community and orders him or

her to complete a period of supervision monitored by a

U.S. probation officer and to abide by certain conditions.

6. sanction f. A term of supervision served after a person is released

from prison; it does not replace a portion of the sentence

of imprisonment but is in addition to the time spent in

prison.

7. inmate g. The release of a prisoner before his sentence has

expired, on the condition that he is of good behaviour.

II. Say whether the following statements are true (T) or false (F); when the

sentences are false, correct them:

1. Community Service is a special condition imposed by the court that

requires an individual to work – without pay – for a civic or nonprofit

organization. ___

2. When a parolee is released to the community, he or she is no longer

placed under the supervision of a U.S. probation officer. ___

3. During the probation period, an individual is supervised by a

probation officer. ___

4. A supervised release replaces a certain portion of the sentence of

imprisonment. ___

5. In post-sentence cases, home confinement is seen as more punitive

than imprisonment. ___

6. A person who violates the conditions of his/her supervision may be

sanctioned to home confinement. ___

7. All categories of offenders are allowed to participate in the home

confinement program. ___

8. Home confinement may include the use of electronic monitoring

equipment. ___

9. The only cases when a person placed under home confinement is

allowed to leave home are work and medical appointments. ___

10. The judges determine if offenders are eligible for the home

confinement program. ___

III. From the verbs in column A, derive the corresponding nouns (column

B) and adjectives (column C), using the suffixes given:

A B C

Verbs Nouns: -ance, -ion, -ment,

-al, -er

Adjectives: -ed, -ing, -able,

-ive

1. to punish punishment, punisher punished, punishable,

punishing

2. to confine

3. to sentence

4. to release

5. to complete

6. to monitor

7. to possess

8. to select

9. to attend

10. to approve

11. to defend

12. to supervise

13. to restrict

14. to require

15. to consider

IV. Use the words given in capitals at the end of lines to form a word that

fits in the space in the same line; there is an example on the first line:

Electronic Monitoring

In most cases, U.S. probation and pretrial services officers use

electronic monitoring in supervising persons placed under

home

confinement. The individual wears a tamper-resistant

……………. on

the ankle or wrist 24 hours a day. The transmitter emits a

radio

……………… signal that is detected by a …………/dialer

unit

connected to the home phone. When the transmitter comes

MONITOR

TRANSMIT

FREQUENT

RECEIVE

CONSIDER

within range

of the receiver/dialer unit, that unit calls a monitoring center

to indicate

that the person is in range, or at home. The person must stay

within

150 feet of the receiving unit to be ……………… in range.

The

transmitter and the receiver/dialer unit work together to detect

and

report the times the person enters and exits his or her home.

V. Choose the correct plural form of the following nouns to complete the

sentence:

1. We need a negotiator to talk to the ………………. .

a) hostages-takers b) hostage-takers c) hostags-takers

2. Many ……………. have been issued this week.

a) search warrants b) searches warrants c) searchs warrants

3. The ……………… will be punished sooner or later.

a) laws-breakers b) lows-breakers c) law-breakers

4. The number of …………….. in our city has been doubled this year.

a) holds-ups b) hold-ups c) helds-ups

5. Two ………………….. have been accused of perjury.

a) woman-diplomats b) women-diplomats c) womans-diplomats

6. “My beloved …………………., your claims will soon be solved.”

a) fellow-citizens b) fellows-citizens c) felows-citizens

7. My ………………… have been charged with indecent exposure.

a) sisters-in-laws b) sister-in-law c) sisters-in-law

8. These ……………… are the result of hard work.

a) analysis b) analyses c) analises

9. Which are the ……………. used in this classification?

a) criterions b) criteria c) criterias

10. Which are the daily ……………… of a prisoner?

a) activityes b) activitis c) activities

VI. Combine the words from column A with words from column B to form

compound nouns and collocations:

trial offender

criminal lines

petit health

first lifting

death matters

community esteem

mental ship

guide courts

member exempt

probation slaughter

citizen jury

tax work

shop officer

self penalty

man state

Example:

1. trial courts

2. ___________________

3. ___________________

4. ___________________

5. ___________________

6. ___________________

7. ___________________

8. ___________________

9. ___________________

10. ___________________

11. ___________________

12. ___________________

13. ___________________

14. ___________________

15. ___________________