undertake a critique of a technological outcome’s design

62
Undertake a critique of a technological outcome’s design Lesley Pearce Technology National Coordinator Team Solutions The Auckland University

Upload: jules

Post on 23-Feb-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Undertake a critique of a technological outcome’s design . Lesley Pearce Technology National Coordinator Team Solutions The Auckland University. Level 8 Learning Objective. Knowledge of Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Undertake a critique of a technological outcome’s design

Lesley PearceTechnology National Coordinator

Team SolutionsThe Auckland University

Page 2: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Level 8 Learning Objective

Knowledge of Design• ‘Knowledge of design focuses on understanding

the way informed creative and critical development of new ideas is achieved and how these are realised into feasible outcomes.’

• It is about demonstrating an understanding of complex concepts in design.

• Understand the importance and impact of design

Page 3: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Why and How

• Why would we consider this important to put into our programmes?

• How will we develop rich learning for our students?

Page 4: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Lets start with…

And what personal criteria do we use

Page 5: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

What is good design?

• The answer of course depends on whom you ask. If a design is “good” it depends largely on its function. A stylish bottle for a drink may look good, but if you need a special opener to get at the thirst-quenching liquid inside, and then one drop at a time, the design has failed.If a design is good it thus depends first and foremost on the interplay of appearance, function and usability.

Page 6: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Okay we all know plastic bottles are evil. They consume massive amounts of energy to produce, statistically only spend 30 minutes in our hands before spending the next thousand years in a landfill. So what criteria do we use to judge the quality of the design?

Page 7: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

What is good design?

• “Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works.” Steve Jobs

• “ Design is a funny word. Some people think design means how it looks. But od course, if you dig deeper, its really how it works.” Steve Jobs.

• “Design is a plan for arranging elements in such a way as best to accomplish a particular purpose.” Charles Eames

• “ All architecture is shelter, all great architecture is the design of space that contains, cuddles, exalts, or stimulates the person in that space.” Philip Johnson

Page 8: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Activity

• Find a quote about good design that resonates with you.

• Find one technological product that illustrates the quote.

• Justify to the group on the quality of design of your chosen image

Page 9: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

What do students think is good design?

What criteria did they use?

Page 10: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

• The design of the Mac wasn't what it looked like, although that was part of it. Primarily, it was how it worked. To design something really well, you have to get it. You have to really grok what it's all about. It takes a passionate commitment to really thoroughly understand something, chew it up, not just quickly swallow it. Steve Jobs

Page 11: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Understand the importance and impact of design

Page 12: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Don Norman: The three ways that good design makes you happy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlQEoJaLQRA&feature=related

In this talk from 2003, design critic Don Norman turns his incisive eye toward beauty, fun, pleasure and emotion, as he looks at design that makes people happy. He names the three emotional cues that a well-designed product must hit to succeed.

Page 13: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

3.10

Page 14: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Form v Function

• Different people will have different views on what good design means to them.

• The old argument form v function is often redundant in the 21st century criteria think – sustainability,

• Cultures, personal preferences interest all play apart

Page 15: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Asking questions

• What is the design philosophy behind the technological object?

• Sustainability Does this make it a good design/• Accessibility – does this make it a good design• Functionality• Quality of manufacture• Emotional resonance• Endurance• etc

Page 16: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Drop Chandelier by Stuart Haygarth

Page 17: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Sustainability

Page 18: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 19: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Accessibility

Page 20: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 21: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Functionality

Page 22: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Quality of manufacture/well made

Page 23: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Emotional resonance

• What product reaches your, “I want one of these”

Page 24: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Endurance

Page 25: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Social benefit – design that matters

Page 26: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Aesthetic quality

Page 27: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Ergonomic fit

Page 28: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Affordability

Page 29: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Industrial design Award 2010

• This year, not one, but three winners were named Best in Show by the 2010 IDEA awards jury. "We have three winners: a technology-based digital product, an ecological responsible consumer product and a socially responsible solution to a basic human need. No result could have more accurately reflected where industrial design finds itself today.

Page 30: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 31: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 32: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 33: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 34: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 35: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 36: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 37: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 38: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 39: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 40: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 41: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 42: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 43: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 44: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 45: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Web design criteria

• Websites• The Academy evaluates Web sites based on six

criteria: content, structure and navigation, visual design, functionality, interactivity, and overall experience.

Page 46: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Activity

• Lots of tech outcomes• Rate 1 to 10 for good design• Discuss criteria used to judge good design• Assess again or use different tech outcomes• Criteria• Match up 10 design characteristics to

different images of products

Page 47: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

design that is …….• Functional• beautiful• enduring• well made —are offset by values like • affordability• accessibility• ergonomic strength• social benefit• necessity• emotional resonance

Page 48: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

• The current issue of Metropolis makes a case for ten criteria for evaluating design arguments today, in the troubled economic, ecological, and political climate of the early 21st century. Arguably, these criteria provide an ethical framework for evaluating design so that the long-established yardsticks—design that is functional, beautiful, enduring, well made—are offset by values like affordability, accessibility, ergonomic strength, social benefit and necessity, and emotional resonance. No argument could meet all these criteria, but it might satisfy a few. More to the point, a loose framework gets us beyond the problem of labeling design as good or bad, or seeing problems as solvable. There are no solutions to design problems. There are only responses in the form of arguments.

• http://www.metropolismag.com/story/20090318/a-good-argument• • Dieter Rams Ten principles of good design• http://www.vitsoe.com/en/gb/about/dieterrams/gooddesign/

Page 49: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Personal design exhibition

• What would you put in it?• Consider the different aspects of good design• Justify decisions

Page 50: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Ask a new question about an old design classic

• Is it still a good design in the new climate of…/Think of the use of steel/leather etc

Page 52: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FRWatw_ZEQI

Architectural draftsman-turned famous rapper, Ice Cube, takes a tour of the LA he loves and visits the house of design visionaries, Charles and Ray Eames. This clip’s worth a watch.

Page 53: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Different criteria different design eras

Page 54: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

SimplicitySymmetryAngularityAbstractionConsistencyUnity

SubtletyContinuityRegularitySharpnessMonochromaticity OrganizationEconomy

Judgement criteria - Bauhaus

Page 55: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Bauhaus

Page 56: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design
Page 57: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Judgements on the quality of Art Deco designs - what criteria was/is used ?

Page 58: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Assessment AS91617

“Undertake a critique of a technological outcome’s design.” External 4 credits

Page 59: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Key words from standard• critiquing (a detailed analysis/evaluation and assessment of the

quality of design of a technological outcome)• technological outcome (fully realised products and systems,

created by people for an identified purpose through Technological Practice)

• design (the look and functioning of a technological outcome, building, garment, or product)

• aesthetic quality ( the nature of , beauty and taste it can be both objective and subjective – the balance between elements like colour, line, shape and how they interact with one another to create a pleasing “whole”. Different cultures, eras have different definitions of aesthetic qualities hence this can be very subjective.)

Page 60: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

• Explain, (Means to give a reason or reasons – an explanation answers the question "why?" or "how does that work?" If the text includes "because" or "so that", it will be to explain something)

• Discuss (to discourse about in order to reach conclusions or to convince, discuss implies a sifting of possibilities especially by presenting considerations pro’s and con’s, to examine something in detail so as to reach a decision. This usually means that more than one perspective is put forward and actively considered. So as part of discussions we may get "compare and contrast")

• Evaluate (to examine and judge carefully; appraise to judge or assess the worth of; appraise

• Justify (for example, to explain in your report the reason why this is a good design using contemporary criteria)

Page 61: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design

Questions to ask students

• Take the criteria in explanatory note 2 and rephrase them into questions

Achieved: • What is good design as we see it today? Why has the

criteria used to judge good design changed over time? • Why is it that different individuals, groups or collectives

may have different perspectives on what is good design?

• How does the design of a technological outcome meet a set of criteria to make it good design?

Page 62: Undertake  a critique of a technological outcome’s  design