understanding the tigersharc alu pipeline

28
Understanding the TigerSHARC ALU pipeline Determining the speed of one stage of IIR filter – Part 4 IIR operation with Memory

Upload: lucian-pierce

Post on 31-Dec-2015

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Understanding the TigerSHARC ALU pipeline. Determining the speed of one stage of IIR filter – Part 4 IIR operation with Memory. Understanding the TigerSHARC ALU pipeline. TigerSHARC has many pipelines Review of the COMPUTE pipeline works - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Understanding the TigerSHARC ALU pipeline

Determining the speed of one stage of IIR filter – Part 4IIR operation with Memory

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

2 / 2804/19/23

Understanding the TigerSHARC ALU pipeline TigerSHARC has many pipelines Review of the COMPUTE pipeline works Interaction of memory (data) operations with COMPUTE

operations What we want to be able to do? The problems we are expecting to have to solve Using the pipeline viewer to see what really happens

Changing code practices to get better performance Specialized C++ compiler options and #pragmas

(Will be covered by individual student presentation) Optimized assembly code and optimized C++

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

3 / 2804/19/23

Processor Architecture

3 128-bitdata busses

2 Integer ALU 2 Computational

Blocks ALU (Float and

integer) SHIFTER MULTIPLIER COMMUNICATIONS

CLU

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

4 / 2804/19/23

Simple ExampleIIR -- Biquad For (Stages = 0 to 3) Do

S0 = Xin * H5 + S2 * H3 + S1 * H4 Yout = S0 * H0 + S1 * H1 + S2 * H2 S2 = S1 S1 = S0

S0

S1

S2

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

5 / 2804/19/23

Rewrite Tests so that IIR( ) function can take parameters

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

6 / 2804/19/23

Rewrite the “C++ code”I leave the old “fixed” values in until I can get the code to work.

Proved useful this time as the code failed

Why did it fail to return the correct value?

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

7 / 2804/19/23

Explore design issues – memory opsProbable memory stalls expectedXR0 = 0.0; // Set Fsum = 0;XR1 = [J1 += 1]; // Fetch a coefficient from memoryXFR2 = R1 * R4; // Multiply by Xinput (XR4)XFR0 = R0 + R2; // Add to sumXR3 = [J1 += 1]; // Fetch a coefficient from memoryXR5 = [J2 += 1]; // Fetch a state value from memoryXFR5 = R3 * R5; // Multiply coeff and stateXFR0 = R0 + R5; // Perform a sumXR5 = XR12; // Update a state variable (dummy)XR12 = XR13 // Update a state variable (dummy)[J3 += 1] = XR12; // Store state variable to memory[J3 += 1] = XR5; // Store state variable to memory

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

8 / 2804/19/23

Looking much better.Use 10 nops to flush the instruction pipeline

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

9 / 2804/19/23

Pipeline performance predicted

When you start reading values from memory, 1 cycle delay for value fetched available for use within the COMPUTE

COMPUTE operations – 1 cycle delay expected if next instruction needs the result of previous instruction

When you have adjacent memory accesses (read or write) does the pipeline work better with [J1 += 1];; or with[J1 += J4];; where J4 has been set to 1?

[J1 += 1];; works just fine here (no delay).Worry about [J1 += J4];; another day

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

10 / 2804/19/23

Use C++ IIR code as comments

float *copyStateStartAddress = state;S1 = *state++;S2 =*state++;

*copyStateStartAddress++ = S1;*copyStateStartAddress++ = S2;

Things to think about

Register name reorganization

Keep XR4 for xInput – save a cycle

Put S1 and S2 into XR0 and XR1 -- chance to fetch 2 memory values in one cycle using L[ ]

Put H0 to H5 in XR12 to XR16 -- chance to fetch 4 memory values in one cycle using Q[ ] followed by one normal fetch

-- Problems – if more than one IIR stage then the second stage fetches are not quad aligned

There are two sets of multiplications using S1 and S2. Can these by done in X and Y compute blocks in one cycle?

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

11 / 2804/19/23

New assembly code – step 1

Make copy of COMPUTE optimized codefloat IIRASM_Memory(void);

Change the register names and make sure that it still works

Things to think about

Register name reorganization

Keep XR4 for xInput – save a cycle

Put S1 and S2 into XR10 and XR11 -- chance to fetch 2 memory values in one cycle using L[ ]

Put H0 to H5 in XR12 to XR16 -- chance to fetch 4 memory values in one cycle using Q[ ] followed by one normal fetch

-- Problems – if more than one IIR stage then the second stage fetches are not quad aligned

There are two sets of multiplications using S1 and S2. Can these by done in X and Y compute blocks in one cycle?

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

12 / 2804/19/23

Write new testsNOTE: New register names don’t overlap with old namesMakes the name conversion very straight forward

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

13 / 2804/19/23

Register name conversion done in steps

Bulk conversionwith no error So many errors made during

bulk conversion that went to Find/replace/ test for each register individually

Setting Xin – XR4and Yout = XR8saves one cycle

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

14 / 2804/19/23

Update tests to use IIRASM_Memory( ) version with real memory access

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

15 / 2804/19/23

Fix bringing state variables in

QUESTION

We haveXR18 = [J6 += 1] (load S1)

andR19 = [J6 += 1] (load S2)

Both are valid What is the difference?

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

16 / 2804/19/23

Send state variables outGo for the gusto – use L[ ] (64-bit) Need to

recalculate the test resultstate[1] is NOT Yout

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

17 / 2804/19/23

Redo calculation for value stored as S1 S0 =

Xin 5.5 + S1 *H4 + 2 * 5 + S2 * H3 + 3 * 4

S1 = S0

Expect stored value of 27.5

Need to fix testof state values after function

CHECK(state[0] == 27.5);

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

18 / 2804/19/23

Working solution -- I

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

19 / 2804/19/23

Working Solution -- Part 2

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

20 / 2804/19/23

Working solution – Part 3

I could not spot where any extra stalls would occur because of memory pipeline reads and writes

All values were in place when needed

Need to check with pipeline viewer

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

21 / 2804/19/23

Lets look at DATA MEMORY and COMPUTE pipeline issues -- 1

No problems

here

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

22 / 2804/19/23

Lets look at DATA MEMORY and COMPUTE pipeline issues -- 2

No problems

here

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

23 / 2804/19/23

Weird stuff happening with INSTRUCTION pipeline

Only 9 instructions being fetched but we are executing 21!

Why all these instruction stalls?

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

24 / 2804/19/23

Adjust pipeline view for closer look.Adjust dis-assembler window

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

25 / 2804/19/23

Analysis

We are seeing the impact of the processor doing quad-fetches of instructions (128-bits) into IAB (instruction alignment buffer)

Once in the IAB, then the instructions (32-bits) are issued to the various executionunits as needed.

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

26 / 2804/19/23

Note the fetch into the next subroutine despite return (CJMP)

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

27 / 2804/19/23

Note that processor continues to fetch “the wrong” instructions

Speed IIR -- stage 4 M. Smith, ECE, University of Calgary, Canada

28 / 2804/19/23

Understanding the TigerSHARC ALU pipeline TigerSHARC has many pipelines Review of the COMPUTE pipeline works Interaction of memory (data) operations with COMPUTE

operations What we want to be able to do? The problems we are expecting to have to solve Using the pipeline viewer to see what really happens

Changing code practices to get better performance Specialized C++ compiler options and #pragmas

(Will be covered by individual student presentation) Optimized assembly code and optimized C++