understand how we can test and improve validity of a study the pros and cons of different sampling...
TRANSCRIPT
Understand how we can test and improve validity of a study
The Pros and Cons of different sampling techniques
Definitions
• Internal – Are we really measuring what we want to
• Popluation – Can we apply our findings to other populations other than our sample
• Ecological – Does it reflect real life
• External – Does the task reflect real life?
• Confounding Variables – uncontrolled Extraneous variables
• Extraneous Variables – extra variables that can be controlled
• Demand Characteristics – when a pps guesses the aim of the study and behaves in a way they think is expected
• Experimenter Bias – when a psychologist designs their method or observation in a way that biases their results towards their hypothesis
Definitions
IV DV
Confounding variable
Extraneous Variables
ALL these things affect
VALIDITY!!
Improving External Validity- Repeat the experiment in different ways
Context Validity/Ecological Validity• Also applies across different contexts
Temporal/Historical Validity• Do findings from the past still apply?
Population Validity• Can we apply our findings to other
populations (not just our sample)
Improving Internal Validity30 word wonder!
•Face validity
•Content Validity
•Concurrent Validity
•Predictive Validity
Write it on the board!