underground system design tadp 547 basic cable design ii
TRANSCRIPT
Underground System Design
TADP 547
Basic Cable
Design II
Presentation 4.2
Instructor: Frank Frentzas
Cable Ampacity
Ampacity is the current a cable conductor can
carry without exceeding allowable insulation
temperature under various installation conditions.
Key factors that impact circuit ampacity include:
– conductor material and size
– depth and soil conditions
– phase configuration
– grounding and bonding schemes
– fluid circulation and cooling on pipe type
cables
Cable Ampacity Calculations
Ampacity determined by calculating the maximum
current for an allowable temperature rise based
upon cable construction and installation conditions.
The cable ampacity can be solved using the thermal
equivalent of Ohm’s Law, shown below:
Electrical Circuit
Cable Ampacity Calculations
The circuits can be compared as follows:
– Current I is equivalent to Heat W
– Resistance Rel is equivalent to Thermal Resistance Rth
– Voltage Drop DV is equivalent to Temperature Drop DT
– Most ampacity calculations are based on the J.H. Neher
and M.H. McGrath paper from 1957.
– The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has
developed Standards (IEC-60287 and IEC-60853) to provide
instructions for calculating ampacity based on cable
construction.
Steady State Calculations
A steady state ampacity calculation involves the
transfer of I2R and dielectric losses (in conductor
and cable sheath) to the cable surrounds.
Steady state ampacity is the cable rating under
normal loading conditions over a long time period.
Ampacity calculations are performed using a unit
cable length of 1 meter.
A thermal ohm-meter (C0-m/W) is thermal resistance
that cause a 1C0 rise in conductor temperature when
1 W/meter heat is generated in the cable conductor.
A Thermal Ohm-Meter Diagram
1 meter
1 Watt
DT = 1C0Conductor
Cable Insulation
Ampacity Calculation - Procedure
First choose a conductor size you think should
meet the requirement.
Using industry standards (or manufacturers
recommendations) establish maximum allowable
conductor temperature.
Start by calculating dielectric losses.
Calculate resistance of cable components carrying
current.
Calculate thermal resistance of each component.
Ampacity Calculation - Procedure
Calculate temperature rise from dielectric losses flowing
through thermal resistance of each component and
subtract from total temperature rise.
Solve Ohm’s Law equivalent to determine ampacity for
allowable temperature rise.
Depending on ampacity calculated, you will need to make
adjustments to conductor size and/or installation
conditions, i.e. spacing, thermal soil, etc.
Repeat calculations after adjustments to achieve the
required ampacity.
Thermal Equivalent of Single Conductor Cable
Wd
Tamb
(Earth)
Tj (Jacket)Tc (Conductor)
Tamb
Rearth
Td (Duct)
R ins R j Rjack-duct Rd Renv Rmutual
WC Ws
Ampacity Improvements
Factors which can improve ampacity:
– depth is critical - since heat from cable has to dissipate
through earth and escape to surface
– summer ambient soil temperature and surface covering
with high solar absorption must be considered when
establishing depth, i.e. asphalt tends to increase soil
temperature by as much as 50C
– soil conditions - thermal resistivity is important but the use
of thermal backfills can improve those conditions.
Ampacity Improvements
– thermal crossings, other power cables, steam pipes or
other external heat sources
– phase spacing and configuration - phase spacing may be
increased to compensate for increased depths
– sheath bonding schemes - multiple point bonding can
increase current flow on sheath compared to single point
and cross-bonding
– Sheath circulating currents can cause a substantial
reduction to overall cable ampacity
– depending on sheath losses - 15 to 35% reduction in cable
ampacity can be observed
Ampacity Increase
To increase ampacity on High Pressure Fluid
Filled (HPFF) pipe type systems, circulating
pumps are installed to circulated the fluid via a
return pipe and air coils (radiators) to eliminate
hot spots along the route.
If additional capacity required, mechanical
refrigeration units can be installed to cool the
dielectric fluid further.
Several computer programs exist to calculate
ampacity on new and existing installations.
Electric and Magnetic Fields
Current flow in a conductor creates a Magnetic Field around
the cable.
Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) have been a hot topic when
installing power lines the past 15 years.
There is a concern that EMF’s from power lines may cause
health problems to nearby residents.
Most of the evidence or research of potential health effects
from power lines are inconclusive.
Although EMF’s have been a topic on overhead lines,
underground installations are also starting to get public
attention.
Electromagnetic Fields
EMF tends to be more of an issue in European
countries than it is in North America.
Some states have requirements for magnetic fields
or require “prudent avoidance” for new lines.
Lower requirements are typically imposed as part
of a new line certification process.
New York requires 200 milliGauss (mG)
California requires “Prudent Avoidance”
Florida requires as high as 250 mG, depending on
system voltage.
EMF Issues (cont.)
Tennessee requires 4 mG beyond right-of-way
Washington requires “Prudent Avoidance”
Italy requires 30 mG at ground level and certain
cities require 2 to 4 mG.
Sweden requires 300 mG at ground level in areas
with limited access and 2 mG for sensitive areas.
These requirements are measured at edge of the
right-of-way or at ground level.
Utilities are forced to reduce the EMF levels on new
lines by optimizing cable/phase placement.
Cable Shielding for EMF
A common practices to reduce EMF levels is to
optimize cable location or phase configuration.
In some cases magnetic shielding is used to obtain
desired levels.
Another technique is to place the cables in a steel
pipe, although it will reduce circuit ampacity.
Installing cables deeper can also reduce ground level
EMF.
Also, installing a passive loop with ground continuity
conductors.
Phase Configuration
Reversing cable phase configuration (shown below)
can reduce EMF’s by a factor of 10.
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
C
B
C
Duct Bank
Concrete Encased
Duct Bank
Concrete Encased
Double Circuit Reduction
For optimum reduction the phase configuration for
a double circuit is shown below:
A
C
C
A
B
B
Duct Bank
Concrete Encased
Shielding Methods
Other methods used to shield cables:
B
A
C
C
A
B
Metal Plate
B
A
C
C
A
B
Side Shields
Other Shielding Methods
Other shielding methods involve steel pipes or
metal troughs to enclose cables. However, these
methods can increase installation costs and, most
importantly, trap heat may result in de-rating the
circuit ampacity.
This explains why HPFF pipe type systems have a
lower EMF value than single conductor cables such
as XLPE or LPFF.
Passive loop shielding use continuity conductors
placed on top of the duct bank and bonded together
at the splice manholes.
Cathodic Protection
Once a cable or pipe has been buried it will start to
corrode or form rust on the surface. To avoid rust
or pitting a cathodic system is used.
The area of steel on which the rust forms is called
an anode.
The area of steel that discharge electrons into the
soil is called a cathode.
There must be a potential difference between the
anode and cathode in order for corrosion to occur.
Stray Current
Another cause of corrosion is Stray Currents,
typically direct current (DC).
DC is usually from trains or DC rectifiers in the
area.
The DC passes through ground to the cable
system which carries it back to the DC source.
The point at which stray current is picked up by
the pipe is the cathode and where it leaves is the
anode, and this is where corrosion occurs.
Cathodic Protection Systems
To prevent the pipe from corroding a cathodic
protection system must be designed to make the
pipe a cathode.
One system is to connect the pipe to a metal that
is higher on the galvanic series. This creates a
potential difference between the two metals so
that current will be discharged from the anodic
metal and be picked up by the pipe. The system is
called the Galvanic Cathodic Protection System
and typically uses magnesium anodes.
Cathodic Protection Systems (cont.)
Another system involves connecting the pipe to
another metal and applying an external potential
between the two metals. The source is a rectifier in
which the positive(+) is connected to the anode and
the negative(-) to the pipe, making that the cathode.
The method is called an impressed current system
and is typically used to protect HPFF cable systems.
In order to protect the pipe, ground must float and
during a fault it needs to go to ground. To
accomplish this Isolated Surge Protector (ISP) are
used.
Protective Coating
Pipes used for cable systems have a protective
coating, in addition to cathodic protection.
Early pipe coatings systems include asphalt, mastic,
and coal-tar enamel. More recently, polyethylene and
polypropylene type coatings have been employed.
If the pipe coating could remain perfect (no damage)
no corrosion system would be required. However,
due to constructions dig-ins, surge or fault currents,
etc. protection is required.
Cathodic Protection - Testing
As the coating is critical to protecting the pipe, a
number of tests are performed to insure coating
integrity.
One test, performed when the pipe is first installed,
is called the “jeep” test. The test applies high
voltage DC across the coating and pipe, and if any
defects (holidays) are detected they are repaired
before the pipe is back filled.
After the back filled operation a coating resistance
test is performed to check for coating defects by
applying current to each pipe section.
Cathodic Protection - Maintenance
To insure the system is properly protected, pipe
coating surveys and rectifier reading are part of
the maintenance program.
A maintenance cycle is three years, but it will also
depend upon local system conditions such as DC
trains in area or heavy construction. If necessary,
the frequency can be changed to annually.
Protecting the pipe coating and avoiding corrosion
can prevent dielectric leaks which can be an
environmental hazard.