unconventional development & energy independence...annual changes in u.s. natural gas proved...
TRANSCRIPT
Unconventional Development & Energy Independence 2014 SONRIS To Sunset Annual Conference Louisiana Department of Natural Resources August 27, 2014
David E. Dismukes, Ph.D. Center for Energy Studies Louisiana State University
Center for Energy Studies
Center for Energy Studies
Take Away Points
2 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
• Unconventional development continues to dramatically change the U.S. economic landscape.
• U.S. has already moved from being an anticipated importer to major exporter of natural gas.
• U.S. has moved being the largest crude oil producer.
• U.S. likely to be a net exporter by 2036 under continued high prices.
• Impacts go far beyond resource independence and are now reaching into manufacturing.
• U.S. likely to unwind decades worth of global manufacturing market share losses.
Overview
Center for Energy Studies
Unconventional Development & Energy Resource Independence
3 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Domestic Shale Gas Basins and Plays
Center for Energy Studies
4 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Unlike conventional
resources, shale plays (natural
gas, liquids, and crudes) are
located almost ubiquitously
throughout the U.S. and are the primary reason
for the decrease in overall and
regional natural gas prices.
Unconventional Revolution
Changes in Natural Gas Reserves and Production
Center for Energy Studies
Natural gas production and reserves are at levels not seen since the 1970s and both U.S. natural gas production and reserves are now at an all time recorded peak.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Natural Gas Reserves Natural Gas Production
U.S
. Dry
Nat
ural
Gas
P
rove
d R
eser
ves
(Tcf
) U
.S. N
atural Gas
Marketed P
roduction (Tcf)
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy. 5 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Unconventional Revolution
Annual Changes in U.S. Natural Gas Proved Reserves (Shale and Other)
Center for Energy Studies
Expanded exploration and development of unconventional resources has driven increases in natural gas proved reserves in recent years. Net additions in shale natural gas reserves totaled 34.2 Tcf in 2011, outpacing the overall net decrease in natural gas
reserves from all other sources combined.
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Shale Other
Ann
ual C
hang
e (T
cf)
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy. 6 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Shale’s Share of Reserves
Unconventional Revolution
Res
erve
s, T
cf
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Annual Energy Outlook, Natural Gas Reserves
Center for Energy Studies
200
250
300
350
400
450
2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040
Unconventional resources are not a “flash in the pan” and are anticipated to continue to increase over the next two decades or more.
Unconventional Revolution
7 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Center for Energy Studies
There are a wide range of unconventional shale gas reserve estimates from as low as 436 Tcf to as high as 2,750 Tcf. This represents a range of between 18 years to over
100 years of available natural gas resources based upon current consumption levels.1
8 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
EIA AEO 2012 MIT ITG InvestmentResearch
IHS Energy
Est
imat
ed R
eser
ves,
Tcf
Note: 1Assumes an annual consumption level of 24.3 Tcf. The MIT study reached a mean estimate of technically recoverable resources of 631 Tcf with an 80 percent confidence interval of 418 to 871 Tcf. The ITG estimates of recoverable resources is for 10 overlapping plays, totaling 900 Tcf. These are the same 10 plays as estimated by the EIA’s AEO (resulting in 426 Tcf). IHS Energy estimates show that total recoverable shale in the U.S. could be as high as 2,750 Tcf, significantly higher than their estimate of 1,268 in 2010.
Alternative Natural Gas Reserve Forecasts
Unconventional Revolution
Center for Energy Studies
Forecast U.S. Natural Gas Production
9 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Shale gas Tight gas Non-associated offshoreAlaska Coalbed methane Associated with oilNon-associated onshore
Tcf
Shale availability will drive U.S. natural gas supply.
Shale Gas Production
Associated Gas Production
Unconventional Revolution
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
U.S. Natural Gas Rig Count and Henry Hub Price
Center for Energy Studies
Natural gas rigs closely follow the natural gas spot price. Price decrease that started in 2007 has reduced gas drilling attractiveness.
Num
ber o
f Rig
s
10 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
Jan-97 Jan-99 Jan-01 Jan-03 Jan-05 Jan-07 Jan-09 Jan-11 Jan-13
Natural Gas Rigs Henry Hub Price
Natural G
as Price ($/M
cf)
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy; and Baker Hughes.
Unconventional Revolution
U.S. Oil/Gas Rig Split
Center for Energy Studies
Drilling emphasis over the past 20 years has almost exclusively concentrated on developing new natural gas wells. This has shifted to crude oil drilling emphasis over
the past two years.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Crude Oil Natural Gas
Per
cent
of T
otal
(%)
Source: Baker Hughes 11 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Unconventional Revolution
Changes in Crude Oil Reserves and Production
Center for Energy Studies
Crude oil production and reserves are climbing back to levels not seen since the 1980s.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Crude Oil Reserves Crude Oil Production
U.S
. Cru
de O
il P
rove
d R
eser
ves
(Bill
ion
Bbl
) U
.S. C
rude Oil P
roduction (Billion B
bls
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy. 12 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Unconventional Revolution
Annual Changes in U.S. Crude Oil Proved Reserves (Shale and Other)
Center for Energy Studies
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Ann
ual C
hang
e (B
illio
n B
bl)
Note: Includes crude oil and lease condensate. Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy. 13 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Unconventional Revolution
Res
erve
s, B
illio
n B
arre
ls
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy
Annual Energy Outlook, Crude Oil Reserves
Center for Energy Studies
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040
Crude oil reserves are expected to increase over 20 percent by 2016 and then gradually increase by 18 percent another to 2040.
Unconventional Revolution
14 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Center for Energy Studies
Forecast U.S. Crude Oil Production
15
0
5
10
15
20
25
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Net petroleum and biofuel imports OtherNatural gas plant liquids Tight oil productionCrude oil production (excluding tight oil)
Mill
ion
Bbl
s pe
r day
U.S. production of crude oil is expected to increase at an average annual rate of four percent through 2016. Tight oil production increases from 1.31 million barrels per day
in 2011 to 4.8 million barrels per day in 2020, an increase of 266 percent.
Unconventional Revolution
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy © LSU Center for Energy Studies
International Oil Supply, 2005 and 2013
Center for Energy Studies
16 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Eurasia, 13.9% Saudi Arabia, 13.1%Africa, 11.9% Asia & Oceania, 10.0%Middle East, 10.0% U.S., 9.8%Central & S. America, 8.6% N. America, 8.1%Europe, 7.3% Iran & Iraq, 7.2%
Eurasia, 15.1% U.S., 13.7%Saudi Arabia, 12.9% Africa, 10.4%Middle East, 10.4% Asia & Oceania, 9.9%Central & S. America, 8.8% N. America, 7.8%Iran & Iraq, 6.9% Europe, 4.2%
U.S. oil production has increased since 2005 surpassing Saudi Arabia, Africa and the rest of the Middle East.
In 2005, U.S. production of 8.3 MMBbls/d accounted for
almost 10 percent of
world supply.
In 2013, U.S. production of 12.3 MMBbl/d accounts for
almost 14 percent of
world supply.
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
Unconventional Revolution
Net Import Share of U.S. Petroleum and Liquid Fuels, 1990 – 2040
Center for Energy Studies
17 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040Reference High Oil Price Low Oil PriceHigh Oil and Gas Resource Low Oil and Gas Resource
The share of U.S. net crude oil and product imports has been falling since 2005. The EIA expects the net import share to decrease to 26 percent in 2023. If however, high prices
encourage U.S. development, the share of net imports could drop to zero by 2036.
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
Unconventional Revolution
Center for Energy Studies
18 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Manufacturing & Economic Independence
While the nature of manufacturing has admittedly changed given the “out-sourcing” prior to the 2008-2009 financial meltdown, the U.S. economy is beginning to emerge as a new manufacturing powerhouse.
However, the U.S. economic recovery, and regional economic development opportunities over the next decade will likely be concentrated in a few states and regions. What determines the “winners” and “losers” in this economic resurgence?
The “winners” will be those areas with access to low-cost energy supplies and transportation infrastructure that can move those supplies to rapidly emerging economic development opportunities in manufacturing that were unimaginable as recently as five years ago.
Other important factors influencing manufacturing siting locations includes the presence of a skilled labor force, competitive wage levels, supportive tax policies, as well as fair and stable regulations and regulatory practices.
19
Overview: Why Future Economic Development Will Not be Uniformly Distributed
Manufacturing Independence Center for Energy Studies
20
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
112
114
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Em
ploy
men
t (20
05 =
100
)
States with major shale activity Non-shale states
Note: Shale states include Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Utah and Texas Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Total employment and employment growth has been faster in unconventional shale-based states than in those without these unconventional resources.
Relative Employment Changes, Shale vs. Non-Shale States (2005=100)
Center for Energy Studies Manufacturing Independence
21
Percent Change in Real Quarterly GDP by State, 2013:III TO 2013:IV
Center for Energy Studies
States with significant shale activity.
States without significant shale activity.
WA 1.8
ID 2.7
MT 1.1
CA 3.2
OR 1.2
NV 4.7 UT
3.1 CO 3.7
WY 8.4
ND 8.4
SD 1.3
NE 2.7
KS 3.1
OK 2.9
TX 4.3
NM 4.5
AZ 3.2
MN 0.0
IA 0.3
MO 3.0
WI 1.8
AR 3.0
LA 5.4
IL 3.0
IN 4.2
MI 3.2
KY 3.1
MS -3.0
OH 2.6
PA 3.4
AL .07
TN 2.3
GA 3.9
FL 3.7
SC 2.3
NC 4.1
WV 7.5
NY 1.3
VA 2.3
ME 2.4
VT: 2.6 NH: 1.1 MA: 0.4 RI: 1.8 CT: 2.8 NJ: 2.6 DE: 2.2 MD: 2.3
Many of the states with significant shale activity have the highest growth in quarterly GDP. North Dakota, Wyoming and West Virginia have the highest rates (8.4 percent, 8.4
percent and 7.5 percent, respectively). Louisiana is the third highest at 5.4 percent.
Manufacturing Independence
What is “energy-based manufacturing?” Energy-based manufacturing is comprised of industries that focus or rely heavily on energy as the primary input to make their respective products. Energy is typically a “feedstock” for these industries which use energy to make a number of different products much like a baker uses a common input (flour) to make a variety of different products (biscuits, baguettes, pizza dough). These energy-based manufacturing industries are large, capital-intensive, and compete globally. Energy-based manufacturing wages are even higher than the already-above average manufacturing wage levels.
22
Overview: Why Energy-Based Manufacturing
Center for Energy Studies Manufacturing Independence
23 Note: Energy-based manufacturing includes: petroleum and coal products; chemical; and plastics and rubber products manufacturing. Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce.
Energy-based manufacturing wages in the South are higher than the average manufacturing wage. In 2012, the average energy-based manufacturing wage was 1.5 times that of the average manufacturing wage growing at average annual rate of 5.2
percent (compared to the manufacturing average of 4.2 percent)
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
$90,000
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
Manufacturing Average Energy-Based Manufacturing Average
Aver
age
Wag
e ($
)
Southern energy-based manufacturing wages are
high-growth oriented
Southern Manufacturing Wages vs. Southern Energy-Based Manufacturing Wages
Center for Energy Studies Manufacturing Independence
24
Manufacturing industries use natural gas in a range of applications that include the generation of heat, steam, and power. Feedstock uses are equally important and are
the building blocks of modern petrochemical manufacturing.
Heat
Boiler/Steam
Power Generation
Feedstock
Industrial Natural Gas Usage
Center for Energy Studies Manufacturing Independence
25
The factors driving renewed U.S. manufacturing, particularly chemical manufacturing include:
• Low natural gas price
• Increasing U.S. competitiveness
• (Relative) regulatory certainty
• Agricultural and other final chemical output price stability
• Product affordability
• Strong global demand for chemicals
• U.S. import displacement opportunities
What the Strategic Factors Driving this Renewed Interest?
Center for Energy Studies Manufacturing Independence
26
Shale reserves have a significant impact on future price outlook. Abundant supplies should keep prices stable. The current AEO forecasts natural gas prices in 2030 at
$5.29/Mcf (47 percent less than the 2009 AEO forecast).
Nat
ural
Gas
Pric
e (2
010
$/M
MB
tu)
Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030
Historical Henry Hub AEO 2007 AEO 2008 AEO 2009
AEO 2010 AEO 2011 AEO 2012 AEO 2013
Anticipated price outlook today.
Anticipated price outlook in 2009.
Natural Gas Price Outlook – Annual Energy Outlook (“AEO”)
Center for Energy Studies Manufacturing Independence
27
U.S. $3.40
Germany $13.62
UK $10.26
U.S. natural gas prices are becoming increasingly competitive with other places around the globe that compete for new energy-based manufacturing investment.
Source: FERC; BP Statistical Energy Review; New Zealand Ministry of Business; Innovation & Employment; and recent tradepress.
3.0 Energy Production Revolution
Canada $3.17
Netherlands $10.31
Japan $16.75
(LNG import) Turkey $10.98
Saudi Arabia $0.75
India $4.20
New Zealand $5.77
China $13.40
(LNG import)
Argentina $11.00
World Natural Gas Prices for Industry ($/MMBtu), 2012
Center for Energy Studies Unconventional Revolution
28
U.S. imports are expected to drop by as much as 12 to 18 percent in 2016 and 2017 when new capacity comes online.
Mill
ion
nutri
ent t
ons
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Forecast
Note: Forecasts based on various industry sources. Source: International Fertilizer Industry Association; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; and CF Industries.
Forecasted U.S. Imports
Center for Energy Studies Manufacturing Independence
29 Source: American Oil & Gas Reporter; Oil and Gas Journal.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
U.S. China Rest of World
Mill
ion
met
ric to
ns
While U.S. based projects plan to add an impressive amount of methanol capacity, proposed projects in China will add almost three times as much, totaling 25 to 30
million metric tons. Projects in New Zealand, Brazil, Russia, Azerbaijan and India total 3.2 million metric tons. Still, U.S. projects account for 33 percent of worldwide projects.
Existing U.S. Proposals as a Share of World
Center for Energy Studies Manufacturing Independence
30 Source: Platts, January 2013.
Greenfield Brownfield
Over 10 million tons of ethylene cracking capacity is either under construction or has been proposed. This represents more than 35 percent of current ethylene capacity.
19
13
6
18
14 15
16 2
3 20
4
5
7 17
8 12 1
9 10 11
Most large scale projects are three to
four years away.
Recent and Proposed U.S. Ethylene Cracking Capacity Expansions
Center for Energy Studies
Owner/Operator Location Capacity Site Estimated(tonnes/year) Type Status In-Service00
1. BASF-Total Port Arthur, TX 60,000 Brownfield Completed 20122. Dow Chemical Hahnville, LA 400,000 Brownfield Completed 20123. Westlake Chemical Lake Charles, LA 110,000 Brownfield Completed 20134. Williams Geismar, LA 230,000 Brownfield On Schedule 20135. Ineos Alvin, Tx 120,000 Brownfield On Schedule 20136. Westlake Chemical Calvert City, KY 80,000 Brownfield On Schedule 20147. BASF-Total Port Arthur, TX 100,000 Brownfield On Schedule 20148. Dow Chemical Plaquemine, LA 200,000 Brownfield On Schedule 2014-169. Dow Chemical Freeport, TX 200,000 Brownfield On Schedule 2014-16
10. LyondellBasell Channelview, TX 230,000 Brownfield On Schedule 2014-1611. LyondellBasell La Porte, TX 390,000 Brownfield On Schedule 2014-1612. Westlake Chemical Lake Charles, LA 110,000 Brownfield Postponed 201513. Aither Chemical Charleston, WV n.a. Greenfield Under Study 201614. Formosa Plastics Point Comfort, TX 800,000 Greenfield On Schedule 201615. ExxonMobil Chemical Baytown, TX 1,500,000 Greenfield On Schedule 201616. Chevron Phillips Baytown, TX 1,500,000 Greenfield On Schedule 201717. Dow Chemical Freeport, TX 1,500,000 Greenfield On Schedule 201718. OxyChem/Mexichem Ingleside, TX 550,000 Greenfield Postponed 201719. Shell Chemical Monaca, PA 1,000,000 Greenfield Under Study 201720. Sasol Lake Charles, LA 1,000,000 Greenfield Under Study 2017
Total 10,080,000
Manufacturing Independence
31 Source: Platts, 2013; Oil and Gas Journal; Company websites; and recent tradepress.
Ethylene projects in the U.S. account for almost 30 percent of projects worldwide.
U.S., 28%
Middle East, 25%
Asia, 24%
South America, 13%
Rest of World, 10%
U.S. Proposals as a Share of World
Center for Energy Studies Manufacturing Independence
Center for Energy Studies
Development Potential
32 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
LSU-CES Study (2013): Louisiana Total Capital Expenditures by Sector
Center for Energy Studies
33 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
The LSU Center for Energy Studies (CES) reports an estimated $53.4 billion in new energy-based manufacturing development, most of which is anticipated to occur
between 2014 and 2019.
Bill
ion
$
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
LNG Export Cracker/Polymer Methanol/Ammonia Other GTL
Source: David E. Dismukes (2013). Unconventional Resources and Louisiana’s Manufacturing Development Renaissance. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University, Center for Energy Studies.
Development Potential
Industrial Production and Capacity Indices
Center for Energy Studies
34 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Per
cent
Cha
nge
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Industrial Production Industrial Capacity
Source: Federal Reserve Bank.
Industrial capacity development “leads” later production (and employment trends). Recent development announcements suggest a strong steady opportunity for U.S.
manufacturing output and employment growth.
Positive turn in capacity development
Roughly 18 month lag in production response.
Development Potential
Center for Energy Studies
Conclusions
35 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
Center for Energy Studies
Conclusions
36 © LSU Center for Energy Studies
•The unconventional energy production revolution is having considerable positive economic impacts on U.S. manufacturing/industrial development.
•However, policy needs to recognize that all of this development and the potential “independence” is resource-specific and policy dependent.
• “Independence” does not mean that we will be entirely removed, nor disengaged, from global markets and particular areas of the world.
Conclusions
Center for Energy Studies
Questions, Comments and Discussion
37
www.enrg.lsu.edu
© LSU Center for Energy Studies