Uganda DP Division of Labour Exercise

ODI TeamCentre for Aid and Public Expenditure

9th Nov 2006

This presentation

1. Where are we

2. Data and initial findings (FDT/ Questionnaire)

3. Peer review process for Nov

4. Beyond the Peer review

5. What we need from you

Where we are

• AIM design and data collection (done)• Relating MTEF to PEAP (done)• Peer review (now)• ODI Team visit (mid-Nov)• Initial report (mid-Dec)• Input into PEAP review (tbc)• SWG process (Jan - March 07)• Final report (March)• Implementation of new division of labour

(March onwards)

Data so far

• Responses and data gaps– 19 FDTs, 23 Questionnaires

• Mapping MTEF to PEAP– First time ever

• Role of GoU– Involvement in Exercise

Initial findings

• 1A: Concentration and distribution of aid– N.B. This is mock-up of PEAP engagement – But, numbers of instruments as best proxy– Clear clustering related to PEAP

• 1B: DP characteristics– Nothing unimportant higher standards for leading DP – Leading DP particular emphasis on:

• Dialogue skills and credibility; in-country sectoral and aid modality expertise

– Actively engaged DPs: • HQ support, policy alignment & credibility with other

DPs

Initial findings

• 1C: Sectoral patterns and engagement– figures do not look reliable past 2007-08

(predictability?)– Notable short-term patterns emerging:

• Major aid ↑ in roads/energy

• ↑ in public admin and in security/conflict

• ↓ in GBS

• education and esp health ongoing high levels

Peer review process

Peer review packs

DPs will receive two peer reviews.• Mapping onto PEAP• Report 1- Overall findings• Report 2- DP findings• Comment form

In addition, your own results.

Peer review timetable

We need to decide on dates for following:

• Send out pack to peer reviewers

• Peer reviews returned to ODI

• Reviewed with GOU

• PRs sent back to original DP

• Original DP respond to ODI with any changes

• Re-processing data by ODI

N.B. 20th Nov team in Kampala

• Returning DP reports (for info)

Beyond the Peer Review:next steps

Towards the Interim Report

Full ODI Team in Kampala (19th Nov–1st Dec)

• Analysis of finalised DP returns• Presentation and discussion workshops

with GoU and DPs re findings and recommendations– SWG budget workshops if possible– Dates to be decide (suggest 21st)

• Interim report mid Dec• Presentation at PEAP Review (tbc)

Interim Report

• Based on ToR using material from:– AIM (FDT, Questionnaire), peer

review, other evaluation materials

• Report will set out: – Methodology and process– Findings– Recommendations for

• SWG process • Division of labour implementation

SWG process

ODI option paper presented, Option 4 chosen – GOU based with additional support

• ODI role- providing SWG process design (Dec), preparing data for sectors (Jan)

• The rest is up to the SWGs - where the hard work begins

• Outputs of SWG process sent to ODI team from which we prepare final report

What we need from you

Dates for peer review timetableCommitment to quick turn aroundDates workshops in NovDecision on support role to SWG

process

Thank you

Centre for Aid and Public Expenditure Overseas Development Institute

111 Westminster Bridge RoadLondon SE1 7JD

Tel: 020 7922 0300Fax: 020 7922 0399

Email: uganda.questionnaire@odi.org.uk

Website: www.odi.org.uk