ubc history dept. head tina loo's response
DESCRIPTION
Tina Loo, head of UBC's history department, responded to questions from the fifth estate about how she dealt with allegations of sexual assault brought to her by female students,TRANSCRIPT
1
Vancouver Campus History Department Room 1297 – 1873 East Mall Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z1
16November2015Ms.RonnaSyedCBC,thefifthestate205WellingtonStreetW.,4G200Toronto,[email protected],ThankyouforyourlettersofNovember9and12,2015.InthemyouputanumberofquestionstomeandIwillbeasopenandtransparentinmyresponsesasthelawallows.First,thesuggestionthatItriedtokeepstudentsfromspeakingpublicallyabouttheirstoriesiswrong.Mediaattentiononsexualassaultatuniversitiesiswelcomeasitfocusespublicattentiononacriticalsocialissue.TheUniversityandtheHistoryDepartmentcommendthosewhohavesurvivedsexualassaultandchoosetosharetheirstoriestohelpendtheviolence.Wetakesexualassaultextremelyseriouslyandwelcomeaconstructivedialogueonhowouradministrativeprocesses,whichareseparateanddistinctfromthecriminalprocess,mightbemadeclearerandmoreresponsive.Icanconfirmthatthe“snakesintheroom”commentwasmadeduringtheJuly31,2014meeting,thoughnotbyme.Itwasinresponsetotheviewexpressedbyothersthatspreadingstoriesaroundcampusmightsomehowhelptheircause.Thiscommentwasmeanttocommunicatethatmakingnon-specificorunsubstantiatedthird-partyallegations“islikesayingtherearesnakesintheroomandthenturningthelightsout.”Inotherwords,non-specificorunsubstantiatedthird-partyallegations,whichcannotbeaddressedbyanyofouradministrativeprocesses,cansowfearandsuspicionamongstudentswithoutanypossibleresolution,andassuchcanbecounterproductive.Withrespecttothestudents’petition/statementofMarch31,2015,myconcernwasthatnotonlycouldithaveanegativeimpactonanongoingadministrativeprocessbutitcouldalsopotentiallyleavethestudentsthemselvesopentoactionasitcouldbeviewedasdefamatory.Thatsaid,Ialsomadeitcleartothestudentsthattheydidn’tneedmypermissiontoreleaseapublicstatementonharassment.InallIbelieveatotaloffivemeetingswereheldwithstudentsaroundthisissue.Wecaredeeplyaboutourstudentsandbelieveit’simportanttomeetasmanytimesastheyfeel
2
necessaryinorderforustounderstandtheirconcerns,explaintheUniversity’sprocesses,andreferthemtothesupportservicesavailabletostudentsoncampus..IdowanttoemphasizethattheUniversity–likethepolice–canonlyactonanallegationwhenanindividualwhohasbeenthetargetofsexualharassmentorassaultcomesforwardwithaspecificandformalcomplaint.Weappreciatehowdifficultitisforindividualstodoso,andwealwaysurgesurvivorstotakefulladvantageoftheon-campusresourcesavailabletoprovidethesupportandaccommodationstheyneedtocontinuetostudy,work,andliveoncampus.OnlyonedirectcomplainthascomeforwardtomeasDepartmentHead,andthatcomplainantwasreferredtotheappropriateoffice.Beyondactingonthisspecificcomplaint,overthepastyeartheDepartmenthastakenanumberofinitiativesdesignedtodischargeitscollectiveresponsibilityforcreatingasafeworkingandlearningenvironment,includinginstitutingmandatoryharassmenttrainingforallgraduatestudents,conveningaworkshopbytheAMSSexualAssaultSupportCentreaimedateducatingfacultyontheissueofsexualviolence,reinstitutingtheDepartment’sEquityOfficer,andstrikinganEquityCommitteetodraftclearguidelinesforhowconcernsaboutharassmentandsafetymightbedealtwithattheDepartmentlevel.ThetimelineyoureferenceiscorrectbutIhopeyoucanappreciatethatIamunabletodisclosewhatwassaidduringaparticularmeetingasitrelatestoaspecificcomplaint.Unlikeacriminalproceedingwheremuchoftheinformationispublic,UBC’snon-academicmisconductprocessisgovernedbyadministrativelaw.DisclosinginformationaboutspecificcaseswouldbeincontraventionofBritishColumbia’sFreedomofInformationandProtectionofPrivacyAct.Equallyimportantly,itwouldcompromisetheprivacyofsexualassaultsurvivorsandcoulddiscourageothervictimsofsexualviolencefromcomingforward.Sincerely,TinaLooProfessorandHead