type
DESCRIPTION
An easy guide to TypographyTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
t Y P eEric Norton
![Page 2: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Chapter 01 — RulesChapter 02 — X-heightChapter 03 — HyphenationChapter 04 — AlignmentChapter 05 — JustificationChapter 06 — Combining TypefacesChapter 07 — Quotes, Apostrophes, DashesChapter 08 — Special CharactersChapter 09 — BulletsChapter 10 — Numerals/FiguresChapter 11 — Small CapsChapter 12 — Paragraph BreaksChapter 13 — Headers, Subheads, CrossheadsChapter 14 — Captions and NotesChapter 15 — Font SpecsChapter 16 — Credits
CONTENTS.
![Page 3: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
X
![Page 4: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
01 Use only one space between sentences.
02 Use real quotation marks.
03 Use real apostrophes.
04 Make sure the apostrophes are where they belong.
05 Hang the punctuation off the aligned edge.
06 Use en or em dashes, use consistently.
07 Kern all headlines where necessary.
08 Never use the spacebar to align text, always set tabs and use the tab key.
09 Leave no widows or orphans.
10 Avoid more than 3 hyphenations in a row.
11 Avoid too many hyphenations in any paragraph.
12 Avoid hyphenating or line brakes of names and proper nouns.
13 Leave a least 2 characters on the line and 3 following.
14 Avoid beginning consecutive lines with the same word.
15 Avoid ending consecutive lines with the same word.
16 Avoid ending lines with the words: the, of, at, a, by..
17 Never hyphenate a words in a headline and avoid hyphenation in a callout.
18 Never justify the text on a short line.
19 Keep the word spacing consistent.
20 Tighten up the leading in lines with all caps or with few ascenders and descenders.
21 Use a one-em first-line indent on all indented paragraphs.
22 Adjust the spacing between paragraphs.
23 Either indent the first line of paragraphs or add extra space between them – not both.
24 Use a decimal or right-aligned tab for the numbers in numbered paragraphs.
25 Never have one line in a paragraph in the column or following.
26 Never combine two serif fonts on one page.
27 Rarely combine two sans serif fonts on one page.
28 Rarely combine more than three typefaces on one page.
29 Use the special characters whenever necessary, including super- and subscript.
30 Spend the time to create nice fraction or chose a font that has fractions.
31 If a correctly spelled word needs an accent mark, use it.
01 Rules.
01020304 4
![Page 5: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
28293031
01 Use only one space between sentences.
02 Use real quotation marks.
03 Use real apostrophes.
04 Make sure the apostrophes are where they belong.
05 Hang the punctuation off the aligned edge.
06 Use en or em dashes, use consistently.
07 Kern all headlines where necessary.
08 Never use the spacebar to align text, always set tabs and use the tab key.
09 Leave no widows or orphans.
10 Avoid more than 3 hyphenations in a row.
11 Avoid too many hyphenations in any paragraph.
12 Avoid hyphenating or line brakes of names and proper nouns.
13 Leave a least 2 characters on the line and 3 following.
14 Avoid beginning consecutive lines with the same word.
15 Avoid ending consecutive lines with the same word.
16 Avoid ending lines with the words: the, of, at, a, by..
17 Never hyphenate a words in a headline and avoid hyphenation in a callout.
18 Never justify the text on a short line.
19 Keep the word spacing consistent.
20 Tighten up the leading in lines with all caps or with few ascenders and descenders.
21 Use a one-em first-line indent on all indented paragraphs.
22 Adjust the spacing between paragraphs.
23 Either indent the first line of paragraphs or add extra space between them – not both.
24 Use a decimal or right-aligned tab for the numbers in numbered paragraphs.
25 Never have one line in a paragraph in the column or following.
26 Never combine two serif fonts on one page.
27 Rarely combine two sans serif fonts on one page.
28 Rarely combine more than three typefaces on one page.
29 Use the special characters whenever necessary, including super- and subscript.
30 Spend the time to create nice fraction or chose a font that has fractions.
31 If a correctly spelled word needs an accent mark, use it.
![Page 6: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Readability and legibility are two key elements of printed text that typographer strive to maximize.
Readability: an extended amount of text – such as an article, book, or annual report – is easy to read.
Legibility: whether a short burst of text – such as a headline catalog listing, or stop sign – is instantly recognizable.
There are several factors that determine whether a text is readable. When deciding what typeface should be used for a job, consider-ation should be given to the typeface and its x-height. It is impor-tant to understand how a block of text can express a message through its texture/color, therefore suiting a particular design solu-tion. Fonts set in the same size, same leading and column width will produce varying degrees of “color”.
In typography, color can also describe the balance between black and white on the page of text. A typeface’s color is determined by stroke width, x-height, character width and serif styles.
As a designer, if you are only asked to make the text readable on the page the following questions should be asked...
Who is to read it?Someone that wants to read it? Someone that has to read it?
How will it be read? Quickly. In passing. Focused. Near. Far.
02 X-height.
6
![Page 7: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
X-height
Baseline
7
![Page 8: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel-ebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several succes-sive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural
AKZIDENZ GROTESQUE 9/11
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technol-ogy of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
BAUER BODONI 9/11
X x h g
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were charac-terized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
ADOBE CASLON 9/11
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a mani-festo by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he con-ceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several succes-sive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the auto-mobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and move-
CLICKER 9/11
Xxhg
72 POINT
72 POINT
Xxhg
Xxhg
8
![Page 9: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depic-tion of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its
XxhgFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were charac-terized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudia-tion of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruc-tion of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
Xxhg
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contempo-rary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values
XxhgFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cul-tural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
X x h g
72 POINT
72 POINT
BELIZO 9/11 ITC NEW BASKERVILLE 9/11
DIN 9/11 FILOSOFIA 9/11
9
![Page 10: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glori-fied contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as muse-ums and libraries.
ADOBE GARAMOND 9/11
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrel-evant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural,
HELVETICA NEUE 55 9/11
Xxhg
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrel-evant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and con-flict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional
MEMPHIS 9/11
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were charac-terized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
MRS. EAVES 9/11
Xxhg
72 POINT
72 POINT
Xxhg
Xxhg
10
![Page 11: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and inno-vation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glori-fied the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional
XxhgFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrel-evant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected tradi-tions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasiz-ing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several succes-sive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s mani-festo glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted vio-lence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation
Xxhg
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a mani-festo by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel-ebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were char-acterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted
XxhgFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and edi-tor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, original-ity, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cul-tural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
Xxhg
72 POINT
72 POINT
INTERSTATE 9/11 MELIOR 9/11
GOTHAM 9/11 ROTIS SANS SERIF 55 9/11
11
![Page 12: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel-ebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, main-ly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several succes-sive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural
ROTIS SERIF 55 9/11
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and cel-ebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several succes-sive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions
SCALA SANS 9/11
Xxhg 72 POINTXxhg
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the auto-mobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repu-diation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrele-vant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected tradi-tions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasiz-ing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several suc-cessive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping
72 POINT
TRADE GOTHIC 9/11 UNIVERS 9/11
Xxhg Xxhg
12
![Page 13: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
In unjustified text, the text block is set with normal letter and word spacing. Because of the even word spacing the text will have an even texture – no large spaces between words. The lines will naturally vary in length. a ragged text block can integrate with the layout and add visual interest to the page. The difficulty is making the ragged edge have a pleasing silhouette. When the first line in the text is longer than the second, it becomes separate from the layout and creates a box-like shape. This destroys one of the advantages of unjustified text. The ragged edge needs to have a life, but a narrow column can be less active. Another advantage to ragged text is less hyphenation is needed. Therefore, names, dates or words which are normally read together can stay together.
03 Hyphenation.
Hyphenation rules: — how the text is read avoid widows. — avoid hyphenating or line brakes of names. — avoid hypjenating or line brakes of proper nouns. — leave a least 2 characters on the line and 3 following. — avoid beginning consecutive lines with the same word. — avoid ending consecutive lines with the same word. — avoid ending lines with the words: the, of, at, a, by.. — never hyphenate words in a headline — avoid hyphenation in a callout.
14
![Page 15: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Headlines:Don’t hyphenate headlines.
Don Quixote de la Man- chaWatch where the first line of two-line headline ends. does it create a silly or misleading phrase? If it does, fix it.
Professor and The- rapist to Lecture
Don’t leave widows in headlines.
Man Walks Barefoot Across Bay Bridge
Fix either way:Man Walks Barefoot Across Bay BridgeOR
Man Walks Barefoot Across Bay Bridge
Line Breaks:Look for bad line breaks throughout every line of body copy. Do this only on a final copy after all editing has been done. Examples of what to look for: Make sure headline text is jus-tified appropriately – Use line breaks (shift return) to bump text to next line when needed – Use kerning to bring a hyphenated word together if necessary – Never hyphenate people’s names – Try substituting a short or a long word to make text fit.
Widows and OrphansNever leave widows and orphans bereft on the page. Avoid both of these situations. If you have editing privileges, rewrite the copy, or at least add or delete a word or two. Sometimes you can remove spacing from the letters, words, or lines, depending on which program you’re working in. Sometimes widening a margin just a hair will do it. But it must be done. Widows and orphans on a page are wrong and must be fixed.
WidowWhen a paragraph ends and leaves fewer than seven characters (not words, characters) on the last line, that line
is called a widow. Worse than leaving one word at the end of a line is leaving part of a word, the other part being
paraphrased on the line above.
OrphanWhen the last line of a paragraph, be it ever so long, won’t fit at the bottom of a column and must end itself at the
top of the next column, that is an orphan. ALWAYS correct this.
RiversIn typography, rivers, or rivers of white, are visually unattractive gaps appearing to run down a paragraph of text.
They can occur with any spacing, though they are most noticeable with wide word spaces caused by either full text
justification or monospaced fonts.
Don’t laugh — I have actually seen
this as a printed headline.
Someone did it...
Don’t lose your self respect.
15
![Page 16: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
916
![Page 17: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
1. Justify the headline so it stays on one line.
2. Use a line break (Shift Return) to bump “a” down to the next line, where it fits very nicely.
3. Kern the line a tiny bit to bring the rest of the word “inner” up.
4. Type a dischy in front of the word “often” to bump it down.
5. Never hyphenate a person’s name.
6. If you indent all your other paragraphs you must keep this consitent by indenting all of them.
7. There is plenty of room to squeeze “bought” on the line above, try kerning the line a tiny bit.
8. “Horsebarn” is a good long word that could be hyphenated; type a dischy.
9. In order to get rid of that terrible widow, exghange a short word for a long word.
17
![Page 18: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
— Peter Bilak, Illegibility
Right and wrong don’t exist in the world of graphicdesign. There is only effective & noneffective communication.
![Page 19: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
If someone insists that fully justified text is better than left-aligned text, tell them they are wrong. If someone else tells you that left-aligned text is better than justified text, tell them they are wrong. If they are both wrong, then what’s right? Alignment is only a small piece of the puzzle. What works for one design might be totally inappropri-ate for another layout. As with all layouts, it depends on the purpose of the piece, the audience and its expectations, the fonts, the margins and white space, and other elements on the page. The most appropriate choice is the align-ment that works for that particular design.
Justified TextTraditionally many books, newsletters, and newspapers use full-justification as a means of packing as much infor-mation onto the page as possible to cut down on the number of pages needed. While the alignment was chosen out of necessity, it has become so familiar to us that those same types of publications set in left-aligned text would look odd, even unpleasant.
You may find that fully-justified text is a necessity either due to space constraints or expectations of the audience. If possible though, try to break up dense blocks of texts with ample subheadings, margins, or graphics.
— Often considered more formal, less friendly than left-aligned text.
— Usually allows for more characters per line, packing more into the same amount of space (than the same text set left-aligned).
— May require extra attention to word and character spacing and hyphenation to avoid unsightly rivers of white space running through the text.
— May be more familiar to readers in some types of publications, such as books and newspapers.
— Some people are naturally drawn to the “neatness” of text that lines up perfectly on the left and right.
Left-Aligned, Ragged Right— Often considered more informal, friendlier than justified text.
— The ragged right edge adds an element of white space.
— May require extra attention to hyphenation to keep right margin from being too ragged.
— Generally type set left-aligned is easier to work with (i.e. requires less time, attention, and tweaking from the designer to make it look good).
CenteredThere is nothing inherently wrong with centered text. As with ragged right or fully-justified text alignment, what works for one design might be totally inappropriate for another layout. There are simply fewer situations where centered text is appropriate. When in doubt, don’t center it.
What to Remember...As with all layouts, alignment depends on the purpose of the piece, the audience and its expectations, the fonts, the margins and white space, and other elements on the page. The most appropriate choice is the alignment that works for that particular design.
No matter what alignment you use, remember to pay close attention to hyphenation and word/character spacing as well to insure that your text is as readable as possible.
There will undoubtedly be well-meaning friends, business associates, clients, and others who will question your choices. Be prepared to explain why you chose the alignment you did and be prepared to change it (and make necessary adjustments to keep it looking good) if the person with final approval still insists on something different.
04 Alignment.
19
![Page 20: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
05 Justification.
The only time you can safely get away with justifying text is if your type is small enough and your line is long enough, as in books where the text goes all the way across the page. If your line is short-er, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have many words on the line, than as the type aligns to the margins the words space themselves to accommodate it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve seen newspa-per columns where all text is justified, often with a word stretching all the way across the column, or a little word on either side of the column with a big gap in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can happen with justified type. When you do it, the effect might not be as radical as the newspaper column, but if your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at the example on the bottom of the previous page.
Here is a general guideline for determining if your line length is long enough to satisfactorily justify the text: the line length in picas should be about twice the point size of the type; that is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of research done on readability (how easy something is to read) and it shoes that those disruptive, incon-sistent gaps between the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look at professionally printed work (magazines, newsletters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
21
![Page 22: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
desiredminimummaximum
![Page 23: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The only time you can safely get away with
justifying text is if your type is small enough
and your line is long enough, as in books
where the text goes all the way across the
page. If your line is shorter, as in newslet-
ter, or if you don’t have many words on the
line, than as the type aligns to the margins
the words space themselves to accommo-
date it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve
seen newspaper columns where all text is
justified, often with a word stretching all
the way across the column, or a little word
on either side of the column with a big gap
in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can
happen with justified type. When you do
it, the effect might not be as radical as the
newspaper column, but if your lines are rela-
tively short, you will inevitably end up with
uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while
other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the print-
er, turn it upside down and squint at it.
The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get
rid of them. Try squinting at the exam-
ple on the bottom of the previous page.
1 Melior8/12
minnimum80
maximum133desired100
This is the standard justification setting that Indesign applies. Most of it looks clean. Word spacing may be a little narrow.
Here is a general guideline for determining if
your line length is long enough to satisfacto-
rily justify the text: the line length in picas
should be about twice the point size of the
type; that is, if the type you are using is 12
point, the line length should be at least 24
picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide
the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 pi-
cas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be
on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try
to justify it, and 18-point type should be on
a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most
programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we
grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of
research done on readability (how easy some-
thing is to read) and it shoes that those dis-
ruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words
inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they
look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look
at professionally printed work (magazines,
newsletters, annual reports, journals) and
you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align
type on the left and leave the right ragged.
23
![Page 24: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The only time you can safely get away with jus-
tifying text is if your type is small enough and
your line is long enough, as in books where the
text goes all the way across the page. If your line
is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have
many words on the line, than as the type aligns
to the margins the words space themselves to
accommodate it. It usually looks awkward.
You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text
is justified, often with a word stretching all the
way across the column, or a little word on either
side of the column with a big gap in the middle.
Gross. But that’s what can happen with justified
type. When you do it, the effect might not be as
radical as the newspaper column, but if your
lines are relatively short, you will inevitably
end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines,
while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it
upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be
very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at
the example on the bottom of the previous page.
2 Melior8/12
minnimum30
maximum103desired70
Word spacing has become even more narrow which leaves no room for them to breathe or relax.
Here is a general guideline for determining if
your line length is long enough to satisfactorily
justify the text: the line length in picas should
be about twice the point size of the type; that
is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line
length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4
inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6,
as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type
should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before
you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be
on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most
programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we
grew up on it. But there has been a great deal
of research done on readability (how easy
something is to read) and it shoes that those
disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the
words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides,
they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you
look at professionally printed work (maga-
zines, newsletters, annual reports, journals)
and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to
align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
24
![Page 25: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The only time you can safely get away with
justifying text is if your type is small enough
and your line is long enough, as in books
where the text goes all the way across the
page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter,
or if you don’t have many words on the line,
than as the type aligns to the margins the
words space themselves to accommodate it. It
usually looks awkward. You’ve seen newspa-
per columns where all text is justified, often
with a word stretching all the way across the
column, or a little word on either side of the
column with a big gap in the middle. Gross.
But that’s what can happen with justified type.
When you do it, the effect might not be as radi-
cal as the newspaper column, but if your lines
are relatively short, you will inevitably end
up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines,
while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the print-
er, turn it upside down and squint at it.
The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get
rid of them. Try squinting at the exam-
ple on the bottom of the previous page.
3 Melior8/12
minnimum60
maximum83
desired70
Word spacing still a little to tight, but a little better than before. Some lines still get pretty crowded.
Here is a general guideline for determin-
ing if your line length is long enough to sat-
isfactorily justify the text: the line length in
picas should be about twice the point size
of the type; that is, if the type you are using
is 12 point, the line length should be at least
24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide
the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 pi-
cas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be
on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try
to justify it, and 18-point type should be on
a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most
programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we
grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of
research done on readability (how easy some-
thing is to read) and it shoes that those disrup-
tive, inconsistent gaps between the words
inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they
look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look
at professionally printed work (magazines,
newsletters, annual reports, journals) and
you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align
type on the left and leave the right ragged.
25
![Page 26: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
The only time you can safely get away with
justifying text is if your type is small enough
and your line is long enough, as in books
where the text goes all the way across the
page. If your line is shorter, as in newslet-
ter, or if you don’t have many words on the
line, than as the type aligns to the margins
the words space themselves to accommo-
date it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve
seen newspaper columns where all text is
justified, often with a word stretching all
the way across the column, or a little word
on either side of the column with a big gap
in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can
happen with justified type. When you do
it, the effect might not be as radical as the
newspaper column, but if your lines are rela-
tively short, you will inevitably end up with
uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while
other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the print-
er, turn it upside down and squint at it.
The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get
rid of them. Try squinting at the exam-
ple on the bottom of the previous page.
4 Melior8/12
minnimum85
maximum120desired90
This looks pretty good. The word spacing is almost perfect, but there seems to be alot more hyphenation.
Here is a general guideline for determin-
ing if your line length is long enough to sat-
isfactorily justify the text: the line length in
picas should be about twice the point size of
the type; that is, if the type you are using is
12 point, the line length should be at least
24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide
the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 pi-
cas per inch). Thus 9-point type should be
on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try
to justify it, and 18-point type should be on
a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most
programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-
we grew up on it. But there has been a
great deal of research done on readabil-
ity (how easy something is to read) and it
shoes that those disruptive, inconsistent
gaps between the words inhibit the flow
of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep
your eyes open as you look at profession-
ally printed work (magazines, newslet-
ters, annual reports, journals) and you’ll
find there’s a very strong trend to align
type on the left and leave the right ragged.
26
![Page 27: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The only time you can safely get away with
justifying text is if your type is small enough
and your line is long enough, as in books
where the text goes all the way across the
page. If your line is shorter, as in newslet-
ter, or if you don’t have many words on the
line, than as the type aligns to the margins
the words space themselves to accommo-
date it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve
seen newspaper columns where all text is
justified, often with a word stretching all
the way across the column, or a little word
on either side of the column with a big gap
in the middle. Gross. But that’s what can
happen with justified type. When you do
it, the effect might not be as radical as the
newspaper column, but if your lines are
relatively short, you will inevitably end up
with uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while
other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the print-
er, turn it upside down and squint at it.
The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get
rid of them. Try squinting at the exam-
ple on the bottom of the previous page.
5 Melior8/12
minnimum85
maximum250desired110
Here is a proper example of a good justification setting.
Here is a general guideline for determining
if your line length is long enough to satis-
factorily justify the text: the line length in
picas should be about twice the point size
of the type; that is, if the type you are using
is 12 point, the line length should be at least
24 picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide
the number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas
per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on
an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to
justify it, and 18-point type should be on a
36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most
programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-we
grew up on it. But there has been a great deal of
research done on readability (how easy some-
thing is to read) and it shoes that those dis-
ruptive, inconsistent gaps between the words
inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they
look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look
at professionally printed work (magazines,
newsletters, annual reports, journals) and
you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align
type on the left and leave the right ragged.
27
![Page 28: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The only time you can safely get away with
justifying text is if your type is small enough and
your line is long enough, as in books where the
text goes all the way across the page. If your line
is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have
many words on the line, than as the type aligns
to the margins the words space themselves
to accommodate it. It usually looks awkward.
You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text
is justified, often with a word stretching all the
way across the column, or a little word on either
side of the column with a big gap in the middle.
Gross. But that’s what can happen with justi-
fied type. When you do it, the effect might not
be as radical as the newspaper column, but if
your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably
end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines,
while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it
upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be
very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at
the example on the bottom of the previous page.
6 HelveticaNeue 55
8/12
minnimum55
maximum140desired120
Moving on to a Sans Serif font, the spacings have changed. This one seems just a little bit narrow, but not bad.
Here is a general guideline for determining if
your line length is long enough to satisfactorily
justify the text: the line length in picas should
be about twice the point size of the type; that
is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line
length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4
inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6,
as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type
should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before
you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be
on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most
programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-
we grew up on it. But there has been a great
deal of research done on readability (how
easy something is to read) and it shoes that
those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between
the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides,
they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you
look at professionally printed work (maga-
zines, newsletters, annual reports, journals)
and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to
align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
28
![Page 29: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The only time you can safely get away with
justifying text is if your type is small enough
and your line is long enough, as in books
where the text goes all the way across the
page. If your line is shorter, as in newslet-
ter, or if you don’t have many words on the
line, than as the type aligns to the margins
the words space themselves to accommo-
date it. It usually looks awkward. You’ve
seen newspaper columns where all text is
justified, often with a word stretching all the
way across the column, or a little word on
either side of the column with a big gap in
the middle. Gross. But that’s what can hap-
pen with justified type. When you do it, the
effect might not be as radical as the news-
paper column, but if your lines are rela-
tively short, you will inevitably end up with
uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while
other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the print-
er, turn it upside down and squint at it.
The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get
rid of them. Try squinting at the exam-
ple on the bottom of the previous page.
7minnimum120
maximum180desired150
The word spacing has become to wide and it brings the composition down a lot.
Here is a general guideline for determining if
your line length is long enough to satisfac-
torily justify the text: the line length in picas
should be about twice the point size of the
type; that is, if the type you are using is 12
point, the line length should be at least 24
picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the
number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas
per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on an
18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to jus-
tify it, and 18-point type should be on a 36-
pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most pro-
grams can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-
we grew up on it. But there has been a great
deal of research done on readability (how
easy something is to read) and it shoes that
those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between
the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides,
they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you
look at professionally printed work (magazines,
newsletters, annual reports, journals) and
you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align
type on the left and leave the right ragged.
HelveticaNeue 55
8/12
29
![Page 30: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
The only time you can safely get away with
justifying text is if your type is small enough
and your line is long enough, as in books
where the text goes all the way across the
page. If your line is shorter, as in newsletter,
or if you don’t have many words on the line,
than as the type aligns to the margins the
words space themselves to accommodate it.
It usually looks awkward. You’ve seen news-
paper columns where all text is justified, often
with a word stretching all the way across the
column, or a little word on either side of the
column with a big gap in the middle. Gross.
But that’s what can happen with justified type.
When you do it, the effect might not be as
radical as the newspaper column, but if your
lines are relatively short, you will inevitably end
up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines,
while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the print-
er, turn it upside down and squint at it.
The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get
rid of them. Try squinting at the exam-
ple on the bottom of the previous page.
8 HelveticaNeue 55
8/12
minnimum90
maximum150desired140
Word spacing has gotten even wider here. All the gaps are very evident in paragraphs 2 and 3.
Here is a general guideline for determining if
your line length is long enough to satisfac-
torily justify the text: the line length in picas
should be about twice the point size of the
type; that is, if the type you are using is 12
point, the line length should be at least 24
picas (24 picas is 4 inches-simply divide the
number of picas by 6, as there are 6 picas
per inch). Thus 9-point type should be on
an 18-pica line (3 inches) before you try to
justify it, and 18-point type should be on a
36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most pro-
grams can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-
we grew up on it. But there has been a great
deal of research done on readability (how easy
something is to read) and it shoes that those
disruptive, inconsistent gaps between the
words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides, they
look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you look
at professionally printed work (magazines,
newsletters, annual reports, journals) and
you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to align
type on the left and leave the right ragged.
30
![Page 31: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The only time you can safely get away
with justifying text is if your type is small
enough and your line is long enough, as
in books where the text goes all the way
across the page. If your line is shorter, as
in newsletter, or if you don’t have many
words on the line, than as the type aligns
to the margins the words space them-
selves to accommodate it. It usually looks
awkward. You’ve seen newspaper columns
where all text is justified, often with a
word stretching all the way across the
column, or a little word on either side of
the column with a big gap in the middle.
Gross. But that’s what can happen with
justified type. When you do it, the effect
might not be as radical as the newspa-
per column, but if your lines are relative-
ly short, you will inevitably end up with
uncomfortable gaps in some lines, while
other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the print-
er, turn it upside down and squint at it.
The rivers will be very easy to spot. Get
rid of them. Try squinting at the exam-
ple on the bottom of the previous page.
9minnimum200maximum260desired230
Okay... this is just crazy!
Here is a general guideline for determin-
ing if your line length is long enough to
satisfactorily justify the text: the line length
in picas should be about twice the point
size of the type; that is, if the type you
are using is 12 point, the line length
should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4
inches-simply divide the number of picas
by 6, as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus
9-point type should be on an 18-pica line
(3 inches) before you try to justify it, and
18-point type should be on a 36-pica line
(6 inches). The rulers in most programs
can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-
we grew up on it. But there has been a
great deal of research done on readabil-
ity (how easy something is to read) and
it shoes that those disruptive, inconsistent
gaps between the words inhibit the flow
of reading. Besides, they look dumb. Keep
your eyes open as you look at profession-
ally printed work (magazines, newsletters,
annual reports, journals) and you’ll find
there’s a very strong trend to align type
on the left and leave the right ragged.
HelveticaNeue 55
8/12
31
![Page 32: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The only time you can safely get away with jus-
tifying text is if your type is small enough and
your line is long enough, as in books where the
text goes all the way across the page. If your line
is shorter, as in newsletter, or if you don’t have
many words on the line, than as the type aligns
to the margins the words space themselves to
accommodate it. It usually looks awkward.
You’ve seen newspaper columns where all text
is justified, often with a word stretching all the
way across the column, or a little word on either
side of the column with a big gap in the middle.
Gross. But that’s what can happen with justi-
fied type. When you do it, the effect might not
be as radical as the newspaper column, but if
your lines are relatively short, you will inevitably
end up with uncomfortable gaps in some lines,
while other lines will be all squished together.
When your work comes out of the printer, turn it
upside down and squint at it. The rivers will be
very easy to spot. Get rid of them. Try squinting at
the example on the bottom of the previous page.
10 HelveticaNeue 55
8/12
minnimum55
maximum130desired110
Much better! Now this is a proper justification setting.
Here is a general guideline for determining if
your line length is long enough to satisfactorily
justify the text: the line length in picas should
be about twice the point size of the type; that
is, if the type you are using is 12 point, the line
length should be at least 24 picas (24 picas is 4
inches-simply divide the number of picas by 6,
as there are 6 picas per inch). Thus 9-point type
should be on an 18-pica line (3 inches) before
you try to justify it, and 18-point type should be
on a 36-pica line (6 inches). The rulers in most
programs can be changed to picas, if you like.
Justified text was the style for many years-
we grew up on it. But there has been a great
deal of research done on readability (how
easy something is to read) and it shoes that
those disruptive, inconsistent gaps between
the words inhibit the flow of reading. Besides,
they look dumb. Keep your eyes open as you
look at professionally printed work (maga-
zines, newsletters, annual reports, journals)
and you’ll find there’s a very strong trend to
align type on the left and leave the right ragged.
32
![Page 33: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
06 Combining Typefaces.
When combining serif and sans serif text fonts, one shroud try and match the characteristics of form and type color which include: proportion and x-heights.
“There is not binding recipe for type combinations. It is a matter of typographic sensitivity and experience. Expert typographers, as well as careless amateurs permit themselves combinations that would horrify colleagues with more traditional sympathies.”
Although there is not recipe there is a place to start: keep an eye on the characteristic shapes of the letterform. A well designed page contains no more than two different typefaces or four different type variations such as type size and bold or italic style. (Using 2 different serif fonts or 2 different sans serifs fonts in the same composition is never a good idea)
Sserif
sans serif
Mrs. Eaves Akzidens Grotesque
35
![Page 36: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discard-ing what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion.The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a sub-ject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automo- bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first an-nounced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasiz-ing two dominant themes, the machine and motion.The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automo- bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
aa BB ee GG gg
aa BB ee GG gg
FRUTIGERhumanist24/12 point
ADOBE GARAMONDold style9 point
These two fonts work nicely together because of the different stroke widths they each posess. Frutiger’s is a little more chunky than Garamond which empha-sizes that contrast, but both fonts still feel light and easy to read.
AKZIDENZ GROTESQUEgrotesque24/12 point
BEMBOold style9 point
These fonts also offer and very nice contrast but in a different fashion. Bembo has a slightly larger x-height than Akzidens, which offsets the flow of the type and makes for a faint sense of asymetry.
36
![Page 37: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first an-nounced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contempo-rary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion.The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automo- bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and politi-cal values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion.The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automo- bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
aa BB ee GG gg
aa BB ee GG gg
NEW BASKERVILLEtransitional24/12 point
FUTURAgeometric9 point
Futura is a very beautiful sans-serif font, and it is nicely complemented by the thick and promonent serif-ing that ITC New Basker-ville displays.
ROTIS SANStransitional24/12 point
MRS. EAVESgrotesque9 point
Different letter forms play a big role in making this com-bination work. Mrs. Eaves had very short and wide let-ter formations where as Ro-tis Sans has very tall narrow letter forms. This difference is easily noticed and makes for perfect contrast.
37
![Page 38: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first an-nounced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and edi-tor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contem-porary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion.The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automo- bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and politi-cal values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on
February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro pub-
lished a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tomma-
so Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected
his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static
and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality,
and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected tradi-
tions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing
two dominant themes, the machine and motion.The works were
characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of
a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the
new technology of the automo- bile and the beauty of its speed,
power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and
called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social,
and political values and the destruction of such cultural institu-
tions as museums and libraries.
aa BB ee GG gg
aa BB ee GG gg
INTERSTATEgeometric24/12 point
DIDOTmodern9 point
Here the contrast is mainly displayed with the stroke width of the two fonts. Didot has a very thin and it directly mirrors the size of Interstate’s stroking which, by nature, is much more thick.
FILOSOFIAmodern24/12 point
GOTHAMgrotesque8 point
Both these fonts have very similar stroke widths but the serifs make all the dif-ference. Filosofia has very noticable block serifs that really show up against the lack of serifs that Gotham (light) provides.
38
![Page 39: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first an-nounced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contem-porary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion.The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technol-ogy of the automo- bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and politi-cal values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion.The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automo- bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
aa BB ee GG gg
aa BB ee GG gg
UNIVERSgrotesque24/12 point
SWIFTtransitional9 point
Both these fonts have a rather heavy stroke width, which makes them blend with a nice uniformity. Swift is a little bit lighter still,and is a serif font which gives it just enough of a difference to be noticeable.
TRADE GOTHICgrotesque24/12 point
ADOBE CASLONnew transitional9 point
Trade Gothic’s bold, condensed nature contrast Caslon’s transitional bracketed serifs and curved strokes. Caslon has a wide stroke at times and the darkness expressed there goes well with Trade Gothic’s black letterforms.
39
![Page 40: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and edi-tor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion.The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the au-tomo- bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
WORDS IN LIBERTYA Prologue to Futurism: Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his em-phasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contem-porary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion.The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automo- bile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries.
aa BB ee GG gg
aa BB ee GG gg
BELIZIOslab serif18/12 point
HELVETICA NEUEgrotesque9 point
Both type faces had a wide character width but the differences in stroke width and serifing are extremely different. It’s easy to see how nice of a contrast this turned out to be.
VOLTAslab serif16/10 point
GILL SANShumanist9 point
The humanist qualities of Gill Sans work with Volta’s thick color to create a well-balanced composition. Volta’s wide character width dramatcally differs from that of Gill Sans too, making for a nice look.
40
![Page 41: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
aA
![Page 42: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
07 Quotes, Apostrophes, Dashes.
Quotation Marks:Use real quotation marks – never those grotesque generic marks that actually symbolize ditto/inch or foot marks: use “and” – not “and”. Most software applications will convert the typewriter quotes to the real quotes for you automatically as you type. Check the preferences for your application – you’ll find a check box to tell your application to automatically set something like “typographer’s quotes,” “smart quotes,” or “curly quotes.” Then as you type using the standard ditto key (“), the software will set the correct quotation marks for you.
It is necessary to know how to set them yourself because sometimes the software doesn’t do it or does it wrong:
“ Opening double quote: Option + [
” Closing double quote: Option + Shift + [
‘ Opening single quote: Option + ]
’ Closing single quote: Option + Shift + ]
Usage Examples:Bridge Clearance: 16' 7"The young man stood 6' 2"The length of the wall is 153' 9"
Apostrophe:As as aside, people often are confused about where the apostrophe belongs. There are a couple of rules that work very well.
For possessives: Turn the phrase around. The apostrophe will be placed after whatever word you end up with. For example, in the phrase the boys’ camp, to know where to place the apostrophe say to yourself, “The camp belongs to the boys.” The phrase the boy’s camp says “The camp belongs to the boy.”
“The big exception to this is “its.” “Its” used as a possessive never has an apostrophe! The word it only has an apostrophe as a contrac-tion — “it’s” always means “it is” or “it has.” Always.It may be easier to remember if you recall that yours, hers, and his don’t use apostrophes — and neither should its.
42
![Page 43: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
For contractions: The apostrophe replaces the missing letter. For example: your’re always means you are; the apostrophe is replacing the a from are. That’s an easy way to distinguish it from your as in your house and to make sure you don’t say: Your going to the store.
As previously noted, it’s means “it is”; the apostrophe is indicat-ing where the i is left out. Don’t means “do not”; the apostrophe is indicating where the o is left out.
For omission of letters: In a phrase such as Rock ’n’ Roll, there should be an apostrophe before and after the n, because the a and the d are both left out. And don’t turn the first apostrophe around — just because it appears in front of the letter does not mean you need to use the opposite single quote. An apostrophe is still the appropriate mark (not ‘n’).
In a phrase such as House o’ Fashion, the apostrophe takes the place of the f. There is not earthly reason for an apostrophe to be set before the o.
In a phrase such as Gone Fishin’ the same pattern is followed — the g is missing.
In a date when part of the year is left out, an apostrophe needs to indicate the missing year. In the 80s would mean the temperature; In the ’80s would mean the decade. (Notice there is no apostrophe before the s! Why would there be? It is not possessive, nor is it a contraction — it is simply plural.
Dashes:Never use two hyphens instead of a dash. Instead, use hyphens, en dashes, and em dashes appropriately.
Everyone knows what a hyphens is —that tiny little dash that be-longs in some words, like mother-in-law, or in phone numbers. It’s also used to break a word at the end of a line, of course.
You might have been taught to use a double hyphen to indicate a dash, like so : -- . This is a typewriter convention because typewrit-ers didn’t have the real dash used in professional typesetting. On a Mac, no one needs to use the double hyphen—we have a profes-sional em dash, the long one, such as you see in this sentence. We also have an en dash, which is a little shorter than the em dash.
43
![Page 44: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Hyphen:-
A hyphen is one third of the em rule and is used to link words. It serves as a compound modifier where two words become one, such as x-height. A hyphen is also used to break works at syllables in text blocks.
En dash:– Typing an en dash: Option + hyphen( - )
An en dash is half of the em rule (the width of a capital N) and is used between words that indicate a duration, such as time or months or years. Use it where you might use the word “to.”
In a page layout application, the en dash can be used with a thin space on either side of it. If you want you can kern it so it is not a full space.
Usage Examples:October – December6:30 – 8:45 A.M.4 – 6 years of age
Em dash:— Typing an em dash: Option +Shaft + hyphen( - )
The em dash is twice as long as the en dash—it’s about the size of a capital letter M in whatever size and typeface you’re using at the moment. This dash is often used in place of a colon or parentheses, or it might indicate an abrupt change in thought, or it’s used in a spot where a period is too strong and a comma is too weak.
Our equivalent on the typewriter was the double hyphen, but now we have a real em dash. Using two hyphens(or worse, one) where there should be an em dash makes your look very unprofessional.
When using an—no space is used on either side.
44
![Page 45: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
enem
![Page 46: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
08 Special Characters.
The following is a list of the most often-used special characters and accent marks. On the following pages are the key combinations for just about every accent you might need.
“”‘’–—…•fifl©™® °¢€⁄¡¿‹çÇ
Remember, to set an accent mark over a letter, press the Option key and the other key, then press the actual letter you want under it.
´` ¨˜ˆ
Option + [Option + Shift + [Option + ]Option + Shift + ]Option + Hyphen ( - )Option + Shift + Hyphen ( - )Option + ; Option + 8Option + Shift + 5Option + Shift + 6Option + gOption + 2Option + r Option + Shift + 8Option + $Option + Shift + 2Option + Shift + 1Option + 1Option + Shift + ?Option + 3Option + c Option + Shift + c
Option + e Option + ~ Option + uOption + nOption + i
46
![Page 47: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
![Page 48: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
![Page 49: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
09 Bullets.
Simply put, a bullet is a large dot used to draw attention to each item in a list or series. The items can be single words, phrases, sentences or paragraphs. Even if you use the bullet that is part of your font, don’t automatically assume it’s the right size: it might need to be altered in scale or position to make it look balancednext to the text.
Bullets should be centered on either the cap height or x-height, depending on the nature of your copy. If all of your items begin with a cap, center the bullet on the cap, or a bit lower so it balances with the negative spaces created by the lowercase. If your items all begin with lowercase characters, center the bullets on the x-height. Insert some space after the bullet to avoid crowding.
The preferred way to align bullets is with the left margin. You can also have the bullets overhang the margin, and keep all your text aligned with the left margin. Whichever style you choose, your listing will look best if items that run more than one line are indented so that the copy aligns with itself, and not with the bullet on the first line.
To be more creative, substitute symbols or dingbats for the actual bullets. Try squares, triangles or check marks ( just not all at once, as shown in the illustration!). Keep these simple and in proportion with the rest of your text.
49
![Page 50: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Pick any three adjectives that describe yourself:• lovely• surly• ghastly• womanly• saintly• ungodly• stately• sprightly
Now choose a Dingbat instead of a bullet…
Pick any three adjectives that describe yourself:q lovelye surlyt ghastlyu womanlyi saintlyl ungodly; statelyv sprightly
There are lots to choose from,
but they are usually too big.
(Choose ONE Dingbat)
Pick any three adjectives that describe yourself:v lovelyv surlyv ghastlyv womanlyv saintlyv ungodlyv statelyv sprightly
You can decrease the size of the bullet,
but then it sits too low.
Pick any three adjectives that describe yourself: lovely surly ghastly womanly saintly ungodly stately sprightly
Raise the Dingbat higher off of the baseline.
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
50
![Page 51: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
v
![Page 52: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
10 Numerals/Figures.
Oldstyle figures are a style of numeral which approximate lower-case letterforms by having an x-height and varying ascenders and descenders. They are considerably different from the more common “lining” (or “aligning”) figures which are all-cap height and typically monospaced in text faces so that they line up verti-cally on charts. Oldstyle figures have more of a traditional, classic look. They are only available for certain typefaces, sometimes as the regular numerals in a font, but more often within a supplemen-tary or expert font. The figures are proportionately spaced, elimi-nating the white spaces that result from monospaced lining figures, especially around the numeral one.
Oldstyle figures are very useful and quite beautiful when set within text. Unlike lining figures, they blend in without disturbing the color of the body copy. They also work well in headlines since they’re not as intrusive as lining figures. In fact, many people prefer them overall for most uses except charts and tables. It’s well worth the extra effort to track down and obtain typefaces with oldstyle numerals; the fonts that contain them might well become some of your favorites.
Dear John, please call me at 438-
9762 at 3:00 to discuss marriage.
Or write to me at Route 916, zip
code 87505.
Memphis
Dear John, please call me at 438-9762
at 3:00 to discuss marriage. Or write to
me at Route 916, zip code 87505.
Mrs. Eaves
Notice how large and chunky these numbers appear…
Notice how beautifully these numbers blend into the text…
52
![Page 53: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
1233
![Page 54: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
11 Small Caps.
Small caps are uppercase (capital) letters that are about the size of normal lowercase letters in any given typeface. Small caps are less intrusive when all uppercase appears within normal text or can be used for special emphasis. Computer programs can generate small caps for a any typeface, but those are not the same as true small caps. True small caps have line weights that are proportionally cor-rect for the typeface, which me and that they can be used within a body of copy without looking noticeably wrong.
Small Caps rules:— Use small caps for acronyms. Set acronyms such as NASA or NASDAQ in small caps when they appear in body text or headlines.
— Use small caps for common abbreviations. Set common abbreviations such as AM or PM in small caps so they don’t overpower the accompanying text. Use small caps for A.M. and P.M.; space once after the number, and use periods. (if the font does not have small caps reduce the font size slightly)
— Use true small caps fonts. Avoid simply resizing capital letters or using the small caps feature in some programs. Instead use typefaces that have been specifically cre-ated as small caps.
54
![Page 55: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Where to use small caps:If you set acronyms in regular all caps, their visual presence is unnecessarily overwhelming. One standard and practical place to use caps is in acronyms such as fbi, nrc, cbs, or simm.
Traditionally, “a.m.”and “p.m.” are set with small caps. If you were taught to type on a typewriter (or if you were taught on a keyboard by someone who was taught on a typewriter), you probably learned to set these abbreviations in all caps because there were no small caps on typewriters. But now that you have the capability, you can and should set them properly.
Harriet, an FBI agent, turned on CNN to get the dirt on the CIA before going to bed at 9:30 P.M.
Mrs. Eaves
Harriet, an FBI agent, turned on cnn to get the dirt on the cIa before going to bed at 9:30 p.m.
Mrs. Eaves
These large capital letters call way too much attention…
Making them small caps lets them blend in with the text much easier…
55
![Page 56: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
True-drawn small caps:There are quite a few font families that include “true-drawn” small caps—letterforms that have been redesigned to match the propor-tions and thickness of the uppercase. These families are often called “expert” sets or perhaps “small cap” sets. The result is a smooth, uniform, undisturb- ing tone throughout the text.
True-drawn small caps are specially drawn to match the weight of the capital letters in the same face.
There Is No resT For The WIcked.
Meta
The Wicked Are Very Weary.
Meta
56
![Page 57: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
II
![Page 58: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
12 Paragraph Breaks.
Paragraph breaks set a rhythm for the reader. The breaks have a relationship with the column of text as well as the page margins. A break may be introduced as an indentation, as a space or both. The over all page feel will be influenced by your choice.
Paragraph Break rules:In typography there are 4 rules regarding paragraph breaks:
1. first line at the beginning of an article should be flush left. (do not indent first paragraph)
2. block paragraphs are flush left and are separated by extra leading not a full return.
3. the amount indent is = to the leading. (sometimes needs a bit more)
4. never hit two returns between paragraphs.
58
![Page 59: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention. p But the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become. p While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Wil-liams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Mari-netti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
1 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
59
![Page 60: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris newspaper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contem-porary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and move-ment. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudia-tion of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
2 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
60
![Page 61: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
3 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
61
![Page 62: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention. But the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become. While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futur-ism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “tech-nical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the vi-sual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
4 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
62
![Page 63: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
But the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
5 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
63
![Page 64: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mani-festoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was pa-role in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mys-terious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new perfor-mance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
6 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
64
![Page 65: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
7 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
65
![Page 66: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mani-festoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was pa-role in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mys-terious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new perfor-mance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
8 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
66
![Page 67: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
9 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
67
![Page 68: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Futurism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.But the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
10 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
68
![Page 69: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
![Page 70: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
13 Headers, Subheads, Crossheads.
The main header or “headline” is essential to be bold and leap out as the main title of the page or chapter start. If it does not, the reader may be confused as to where the document actually starts. So I always think its a good rule to ensure the reader knows where a section starts and make it quite plain. The main header should also look like it belongs to the first sentence. This can be achieved by ensuring that its paragraph spacing (the space after a hard return) is smaller than the paragraph spacing of the first sentence. Para-graph spacing is not commonly used - even amongst designers, but it is an extremely useful tool. Many people add spacing by hitting return but this does not give much control and cannotbe styled from style sheets. Introduction paragraphs are a useful way to entice the reader to continue on reading. They also help not to waste a readers time if they are not interested in reading further. Typographically speaking these into paragraphs need to be easy to read but moredistant than the body text below. They are not the main article and need to be distinguished from it. The purpose of a subheader is to split up body text so that a reader can find their way around the document with ease. it also makes the document more readable because the viewer is not faced with a page of block text. Each subheader needs to be linked with the corresponding body text underneath it. This should be achieved by using correct spac-ing after and before the subheader (You find these settings in most “Paragraph” tool pallets and the example below demonstrates how it looks when executed.)
Header:Material which is separated from the main body of text and appears at the top of a printed page.
Subheader:A phrase, sentence, or several sentences near the title of the article or story.
70
![Page 71: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
1 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
TradeGothic 24 & 12
71
![Page 72: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
2 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
Walbaum 24 & 12
72
![Page 73: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
3 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
Univers 24 & 12
73
![Page 74: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
4 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
Clarendon 24 & 12
74
![Page 75: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
5 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
Interstate 24 & 12
75
![Page 76: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
6 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
Mrs.Eaves 24 & 12
76
![Page 77: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Hh
![Page 78: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
14 Captions and Notes.
Footnotes and endnotes are necessary components of scholarly and technical writing. They’re also frequently used by writers of fiction, from Herman Melville (Moby-Dick) to contemporary novel-ists. Whether their intent is academic or artistic, footnotes present special typographic challenges.
Specifically, a footnote is a text element at the bottom of a page of a book or manuscript that provides additional information about a point made in the main text. The footnote might provide deeper background, offer an alternate interpretation or provide a citation for the source of a quote, idea or statistic. Endnotes serve the same purpose but are grouped together at the end of a chapter, article or book, rather than at the bottom of each page.
These general guidelines will help you design footnotes and end-notes that are readable, legible and economical in space. (Note that academic presses and journals can be sticklers for format: before proceeding, check with your client or publisher to see if they have a specific stylesheet that must be followed.)
Numbers or Symbols: Footnotes are most often indicated by placing a superscript numer-al immediately after the text to be referenced. The same superscript numeral then precedes the footnoted text at the bottom of the page. Numbering footnotes is essential when there are many of them, but if footnotes are few they can be marked with a dagger, asterisk, or other symbol instead. Endnotes should always use numerals to facilitate easy referencing.
Size: Footnotes and endnotes are set smaller than body text. The differ-ence in size is usually about two points, but this can vary depend-ing on the size, style and legibility of the main text. Even though they’re smaller, footnotes and endnotes should still remain at a readable size.
78
![Page 79: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.
While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
1 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
TradeGothic 24 & 12
1. Philip Meggs, History
of Graphic Design, Van
Nostrand Reinhold, 1988
2. parole in liberta =
words set free (liberty)
3. selbst = himself
79
![Page 80: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement (Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988). He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mani-festoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta (parole in liberta = words set free [liberty]) , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... a strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by fore-runners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Fu-turists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surround-ings, indifference and engagement, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst (selbst = himself) (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
2 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
Walbaum 24 & 12
80
![Page 81: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
3 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
1. Philip Meggs, History
of Graphic Design, Van
Nostrand Reinhold, 1988
2. parole in liberta =
words set free (liberty)
3. selbst = himself
Univers 24 & 12
81
![Page 82: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
4 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
1. Philip Meggs, History
of Graphic Design, Van
Nostrand Reinhold, 1988
2. parole in liberta =
words set free (liberty)
3. selbst = himself
Clarendon 24 & 12
82
![Page 83: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society.1 Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new technology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passion-ately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later manifestoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta 2 , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst 3 (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
5 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
1. Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 19882. parole in liberta = words set free (liberty)3. selbst = himself
Interstate 24 & 12
83
![Page 84: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Words in LibertyA Prologue to FuturismFuturism was first announced on February 20, 1909, when the Paris news-paper Le Figaro published a manifesto by the Italian poet and editor Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. The name Futurism, coined by Marinetti, reflected his emphasis on discarding what he conceived to be the static and irrelevant art of the past and celebrating change, originality, and innovation in culture and society. [1] Futurism rejected traditions and glorified contemporary life, mainly by emphasizing two dominant themes, the machine and motion. The works were characterized by the depiction of several successive actions of a subject at the same time. Marinetti’s manifesto glorified the new tech-nology of the automobile and the beauty of its speed, power, and movement. He exalted violence and conflict and called for the sweeping repudiation of traditional cultural, social, and political values and the destruction of such cultural institutions as museums and libraries. The manifesto’s rhetoric was passionately bombastic; its tone was aggressive and inflammatory and was purposely intended to inspire public anger and amazement, to arouse controversy, and to attract widespread attention.
Radicial Mix of Art and LifeBut the movements which survive, oddly, here where we live and work as poets and artists: or, if not the movements, then their sense of art as an life itself. All of which, as futurism, had come sharply into focus by the start of the world war: a first radical mix of art and life, the epitome in the poplar mind of an avant-garde. It was, on both its Russian & Italian sides, the first great “art” movement led by poets; and if its means now sometimes seem exaggerated or unripe in retrospect, they carry within them the seed of all that we were later to become.While Marinetti’s opening manifesto for Italian Futurism bristled with a polemical stance in favor of the transformed present (1909), the later mani-festoes of Futurist poets & artists offered formal “technical” approaches to the works then getting under way. The key term—still resonant today—was parole in liberta [2] , by which poetry was to become “an uninterrupted sequence of new images... (a) strict bet of images or analogies, to be cast into the mysterious sea of phenomena.” This freedom-of-the-world, while it resembled other forms of collage and of image juxtaposition, more fully explored the use of innovative and expressive typography in the visual presentation of language, as set in motion by forerunners like Mallarme. But the verbal liberation didn’t end with the page; it moved, rather, toward a new performance art and a poetry that “scurried off the page in all directions at once,” as Emmett Williams phrased it for the “language happenings” of a later decade. Outrageous and aggressive, the Futurists’ performances mixed declamation and gesture, events and surroundings, indifference and engage-ment, to break the barriers between themselves and those who came to jeer or cheer them. Wrote Marinetti selbst [3] (circa 1915): “Everything of any value is theatrical.”
6 AdobeGaramond
8.5/12
[1] Philip Meggs, History of Graphic Design,
Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988
[2] parole in liberta = words set free (liberty)
[3] selbst = himself
Mrs.Eaves 24 & 12
84
![Page 85: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
![Page 86: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
15 Font Specs.
Classification of TypeGaramond did not think of himself as an Old Style designer any more than John Baskerville could realize that some day he would be considered a Transitional designer. What happened is this. Over the centuries type became more and more refined; that is, the contrast between thick and thin strokes became greater and the serifs became finer. This refinement was pos- sible because of the development of smoother papers, better inks, and more advanced printing methods. The ultimate refinement was attained in the late 1700’s when Bodoni reduced the thin strokes and serifs to fine hairline strokes.After Bodoni, type design became eclectic. In search of new forms of typographic expression, designers began to borrow features from one period and add them to another. We see a lot of this today. Many of the fonts designed in the 20th Century are difficult to classify.
Variations in Stress:As early typefaces were based on the written letterforms the scribes, it was
important that the type designer tries to capture as much as the written form
as possible. The letter O is a good example to study the distribution of weight
which creates a vertical stress through the thinnest part of the letterform. It was
this characteristic that the early typefaces tried to imitate. This is quite clear
in Garamond. As type evolved and the designer was no longer influenced by
hand- writing, the stress became more vertical as in Baskerville and later totally
vertical with Bodoni. In Univers you will find no noticeable stress.
Variations in Thicks and Thins:Faces also vary in degree of contrast between thick and thin strokes of the
letters. In Garamond you can see a prominent characteristic of little contrast be-
tween thick and thin strokes of a let- ter. In Transitional faces there is a tendency
toward refinement and greater contrast between thick and thins. Bodoni has
maximum contrast in these strokes (extreme contrast of thick and thins, hairline
serifs). With Serifa there is a return to very little contrast (almost mono-weight.
In Univers the is an absence of any noticeable thick and thin strokes; there is a
uniformity of strokes (mono-weight).
Variations in Serifs:Serifs also vary from one face to the next in their weight and in the way they are
bracketed; that is the way in which the serif meets the vertical stroke of the letter.
Once again, you can see the evolution of type from Garamond to Baskerville,
to Bodoni this was followed by the return of the heavy serif in Serifa and the
elimination of the serif in Univers.
86
![Page 87: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Humanist
xoaengdp— little contrast between thick and thin of strokes — stroke weight has inflections similar to handwriting — strong diagonal stress such as on letter o — sloping bar on letter e
Jenson, Goudy’s Kennerly, Bruce Rogers’ Centaur
Serifs.
Didone (modern)xoaengdp— extreme contrast between thick and thin strokes — hairline (strokes) serifs — horizontal stress — horizontal bar on e
Bodoni, Bauer Bodoni, Walbaum
Gerald (Old Style)xoaengdp— contrast between thick and thin strokes is more pronounced — horizontal bar on e — diagonal stress is less prominent — shorter x-height— scooped serifs, sturdy without being heavy
Sabon, Garamond, Bembo, Times, Plantin, Caslon Old Style
New Transitionalxoaengdp— sturdy typefaces hold up under poor printing — little contrast between thick and thin strokes — horizontal stress — horizontal bar on e— tall x-height — shorter ascenders, descenders
Bookman, Century Schoolbook, Cheltenham
Transitional
xoaengdp— contrast between thick and thin strokes is pronounced — very slight diagonal stress — bracketed serifs — horizontal bar on e— tall x-height
Baskerville, Caslon, Perpetua, (newer garamonds)
Egyptian or Slab-Serifxoaengdp— mono weight — square ended serifs — horizontal stress — horizontal bar on e
Memphis, Clarendon, Serifa, Rockwell
87
![Page 88: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Grotesque
xoaengdp— slight contrast in the stoke weight — slight squareness to the curves — usually a tall x-height : short ascenders and descenders — usually a two story lowercase a — capital R usually has a curled leg — capital G usually has a spur
Helvetica, Univers, Akzidenz Grotesk, Folio
Sans Serifs.
Geometricxoaengdp— vary little contrast in the stoke weight (monoline) — a little wider set — constructed from simple shapes : circle and rectangle — usually a one story lowercase a — upper case A has a pointed apex
Futura, Kabel, Metro
Humanist
xoaengdp— based on the proportions of the Roman capitals — some contrast in the stroke weight — lowercase a and g are usually two story
Syntax, Frutiger, Praxis, Stone Sans
88
![Page 89: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Font Specifications...
89
![Page 90: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: SLAB SERIF
BOOK
HAIRLINE
SEMI-BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Archer
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { } ? ! @ & *
90
![Page 91: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: SANS SERIF
ROMAN
BOLD
BLACK
Akzidenz Grotesk
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefac-es are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: SANS SERIF
REGULAR
BOLD
BLACK
Akzidenz Grotesk
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefac-es are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MaxogGdQRst
91
![Page 92: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: TRANSITIONAL
REGULAR
SMALL CAPS
ITALIC
BOLD
Baskerville
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ RR SS TT UU VV WW XX YY ZZ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
92
![Page 93: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: SLAB SERIF
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BLACK ITALIC
Belizio
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: SLAB SERIF
REGULAR
ITALIC
SMALL CAPS
BOLD ITALIC
Belizio
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxagGdQrR
93
![Page 94: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GROTESQUE
LIGHT
BOLD
BLACK
Bell Gothic
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected
to calligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main
groups correspond roughly to the Renais-
sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in
art and literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
94
![Page 95: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: MODERN
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
EXTRA BOLD
Bembo
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for
their own craft analogous to that of art his-
tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-
nected to calligraphy and the movement of
the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces
are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-
ment periods in art and literature. Designers
in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries
have continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to that
of art history. Humanist letterforms are
closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and
less organic. These three main groups
correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods
in art and literature. Designers in the
twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based
on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: MODERN
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
EXTRA BOLD
Bembo
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for
their own craft analogous to that of art his-
tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-
nected to calligraphy and the movement of
the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces
are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-
ment periods in art and literature. Designers
in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries
have continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-
es was devised in the nineteenth cen-
tury, when printers sought to identify
a heritage for their own craft analo-
gous to that of art history. Human-
ist letterforms are closely connected
to calligraphy and the movement of
the hand. Transitional and modern
typefaces are more abstract and less
organic. These three main groups cor-
respond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods
in art and literature. Designers in the
twentieth and twenty-first centuries
have continued to create new typefac-
es based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxnogGdQrRst
95
![Page 96: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: NEW TRANSITIONAL
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Bookman
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-gous to that of art history. Human-ist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups cor-respond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefac-es based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups corre-spond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment peri-ods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
96
![Page 97: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: MODERN
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
ORNAMENTS
Bodoni
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: MODERN
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
ORNAMENTS
Bodoni
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxaogGdQrRst
97
![Page 98: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: TRANSITIONAL
REGULAR
ITALIC
SWASH
ORNAMENT
ALTERNATE
Caslon
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
A a Bb C c D d Ee F f G g H h Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn o Pp Qq r S s t Uu Vv Ww X x y Z z 1 2 3 4
c h i k l Ss T t
98
![Page 99: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GROTESQUE
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Century Schoolbook
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-enment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic charac-teristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: GROTESQUE
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Century Schoolbook
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-enment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic charac-teristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxaogGdQrRt
99
![Page 100: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: TRANSITIONAL
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Cheltenham
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
100
![Page 101: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: MODERN
UNICASE
REGULAR
Cholla
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to that
of art history. Humanist letterforms are
closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and
less organic. These three main groups
correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn
Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: MODERN
REGULAR
UNICASE
Cholla
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to that
of art history. Humanist letterforms are
closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and
less organic. These three main groups
correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn
Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MaxnogGdQrRst
101
![Page 102: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: SLAB SERIF
LIGHT
REGULAR
BOLD
Clarendon
102
![Page 103: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: SANS SERIF
REGULAR
Clicker
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: SANS SERIF
REGULAR
Clicker
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MaxnogGdQRs
103
![Page 104: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: MODERN
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Didot
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Re-naissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centu-ries have continued to create new type-faces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
104
![Page 105: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GROTESQUE DIN
LIGHT
REGULAR
MEDIUM
BLACK
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 { ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: GROTESQUE
LIGHT
REGULAR
MEDIUM
BLACK
DIN
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MaxnogGdQrRt
105
![Page 106: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GROTESQUE DIN Condensed
LIGHT CONDENSED
REGULAR CONDENSED
BOLD CONDENSED
BLACK CONDENSED
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
106
![Page 107: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: SERIF
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Disturbance
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised
in the nineteenth century, when printers sought
to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-
gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms
are closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and modern
typefaces are more abstract and less organic.
These three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in the
twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-
tinued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo
Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp
Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo
Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: SERIF
REGULAR
ITALIC
SMALL CAPS
Disturbance
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised
in the nineteenth century, when printers sought
to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-
gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms
are closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and modern
typefaces are more abstract and less organic.
These three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in the
twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-
tinued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo
Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp
Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo
Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Mxnatqbwfgdr
107
![Page 108: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: BLACK LETTER
REGULAR
Fette Fraktur
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main
groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *Idunt aliquam adignim velit utat. Etuer accum dunt ad magniam, ven-diat lam verostrud essi tetum illa facipisl utet endre feu faccum dit praessi. Ing ea feuguer aessenim atisi.Delessi. Sectet, sit, ver si.Alit ipit esequis exer adigna adignit aliquat lam dunt utpat aut nisisi.Tate conse nim adionsecte feuis etum dolobore molore verit veniss
108
![Page 109: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: MODERN
REGULAR
FRACTIONS
UNICASE
Filosofia
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nine-teenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and mod-ern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-turies have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: MODERN
REGULAR
FRACTIONS
UNICASE
Filosofia
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxnaopQrRtfGg
109
![Page 110: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GROTESK
BOOK
DEMI
HEAVY
CONDENSED
Franklin Gothic
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to iden-tify a heritage for their own craft anal-ogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups cor-respond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefac-es based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
110
![Page 111: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
CONDENSED
REGULAR
BOLD
ULTRA BLACK
Frutiger
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for
their own craft analogous to that of art
history. Humanist letterforms are closely
connected to calligraphy and the move-
ment of the hand. Transitional and modern
typefaces are more abstract and less or-
ganic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries have continued to create new
typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefac-es are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
CONDENSED
REGULAR
BOLD
ULTRA BLACK
Frutiger
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for
their own craft analogous to that of art
history. Humanist letterforms are closely con-
nected to calligraphy and the movement of
the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces
are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in the
twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefac-es are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MaxodQRtfGg
111
![Page 112: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GEOMETRIC SANS
BOOK
BOLD
EXTRA BOLD
Futura
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transi-tional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-ment periods in art and literature. De-signers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic character-istics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups corre-spond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment peri-ods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
112
![Page 113: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Gill Sans
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renais-sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Gill Sans
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renais-sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MaxnbyogGQRt
113
![Page 114: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GEOMETRIC SANS
BOOK
BOLD
ITALIC
LIGHT
Gotham
A basic system for classifying type-
faces was devised in the nineteenth
century, when printers sought to
identify a heritage for their own
craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely con-
nected to calligraphy and the move-
ment of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract
and less organic. These three main
groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-
enment periods in art and litera-
ture. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-
faces was devised in the nineteenth
century, when printers sought to
identify a heritage for their own
craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely
connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional
and modern typefaces are more ab-
stract and less organic. These three
main groups correspond roughly
to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and
literature. Designers in the twenti-
eth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
114
![Page 115: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GROTESQUE
REGULAR
BOLD
BLACK EXTENDED
Helvetica
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups cor-respond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-turies have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
ULTRA LIGHT
CLASSIFICATION: GROTESQUE
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
ULTRA LIGHT
Helvetica
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups cor-respond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-turies have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MaoygGdQrRt
115
![Page 116: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GROTESQUE
REGULAR
BOLD
BLACK
BOLD CONDENSED
Interstate
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a
heritage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letterforms
are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transi-
tional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three
main groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-
ment periods in art and literature. De-
signers in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries have continued to create new
typefaces based on historic character-
istics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-
es was devised in the nineteenth cen-
tury, when printers sought to identify
a heritage for their own craft analo-
gous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefac-
es are more abstract and less organic.
These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque,
and Enlightenment periods in art and
literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have contin-
ued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
116
![Page 117: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: SCRIPT
REGULAR
Kunstler Script
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Pat. San ea consectet ad duis dolorem eu facil dit am, summy nisim ipit, quat, velit pratis-
modo diat.
Et lorperi liquat lor sequam zzrilit, velese facin ut verosti nciduis modit, qui erosto odit ut verit
nos nos amet iure doluptatisl digna facin hendre ming ea feum incilla ad dunt dunt ipit vulput
lorper sumsand ionsenit num ip erit la feu feumsan henis exerci esto etumsan hent am, velit,
quisit nummy nosto dolutat irit veniam zzrilit, qui tincilit wis eum zzriustis ex eraestrud delit
lamcon vero exercidunt aliscidui bla facip et veniam eum illan veros dignit alit vullandiat nis
nisl dunt aliquam consent alit etuero odionsecte dunt nulla faci et in vulla feugait lore eum zzril
ullamco nsequi bla autpatet nummodipisi.
Ed etummodit vullamcon utat ulluptat delendit nonsenim inciliqui tio odoloreet ver sum velis
aliquis del irit aut nosto consequam zzrit aut ipsum diamcon sequam num et wisi tio dolorem
elesto dolobor iuscilisci et, quis endre te dolobor sum volenibh exerit utpat. Uptat, vel dolese
molorem eraessis nit niamcorperos autat, venit in etum erilissit irit eui bla feum iurem nonsequi e
CLASSIFICATION: SCRIPT
REGULAR
Kunstler Script
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
xyogGdQrRst
Dolessecte ver sim er aut wismod mincilit loboreet praessed tat. Iquis eu feuis dolore faci ercil eriurer sisi tet, quamconse do odolor amcommodit vulla feugait luptatisl dolorer augait praessi. Lut vel iriuscil et luptat. Nullandre magna feugiam, quis aute conullu ptatincip ea alit wis et volore dip et, cortin henisi. Quis autet, veros accum ipit vel ute mod ting eumsandreet am, qui te faciniat nummod eu feugiat ex essim vent vendre tat venibh et pratuer ipsum volortio eniat praessed mincilit dolobortie tat. Lam dolut amcommy nos eraessed tin ulput ut vulputat, quat, volobor incip et essi.orper sum quamconsed magniam, quisit accum voloborem alit iuscipit la consequam dit nulput acing eu feum quat. Ut luptat at.
117
![Page 118: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: TRANSITIONAL
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BOLD
Melior
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twen-tieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transi-tional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-ment periods in art and literature. De-signers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic character-istics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
118
![Page 119: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: SLAB SERIF
LIGHT
MEDIUM
EXTRA BOLD
Memphis
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and En-lightenment periods in art and litera-ture. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: SLAB SERIF
LIGHT
MEDIUM
EXTRA BOLD
Memphis
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and En-lightenment periods in art and litera-ture. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxagGdQrRt
119
![Page 120: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
REGULAR
CAPS
BLACK
ITALIC
Meta
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefac-es are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-ment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
120
![Page 121: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: OLD STYLE
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
FRACTIONS
Mrs Eaves
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when print-
ers sought to identify a heritage for their own
craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transitional
and modern typefaces are more abstract and less
organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-
turies have continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the
nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage
for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-
ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: OLD STYLE
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
FRANCTIONS
Mrs. Eaves
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when print-
ers sought to identify a heritage for their own
craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transitional
and modern typefaces are more abstract and less
organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first cen-
turies have continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the
nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage
for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist
letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-
ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces
based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MaxogGdQrRst
121
![Page 122: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GROTESQUE
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
News Gothic
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when print-ers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transi-tional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-ment periods in art and literature. De-signers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic character-istics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
122
![Page 123: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GEOMETRIC SANS
REGULAR
OCR A
A basic system for clas-
sifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth
century, when printers
sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft
analogous to that of art
history. Humanist let-
terforms are closely con-
nected to calligraphy and
the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern
typefaces are more histor-
ic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: GEOMETRIC SANS
REGULAR
OCR A
A basic system for clas-
sifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth
century, when printers
sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft
analogous to that of art
history. Humanist let-
terforms are closely con-
nected to calligraphy and
the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern
typefaces are more ab-
stract and less organic.
These three main groups
correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in
art and literature. De-
signers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries
have continued to cre-
ate new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MaopQRfGg
123
![Page 124: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
BOOK
ITALIC
BOLD
Optima
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxaopQRstGg
124
![Page 125: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: OLD STYLE
LIGHT
OLD STYLE
MEDIUM
BLACK
Palatino
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: OLD STYLE
LIGHT
OLD STYLE
MEDIUM
BLACK
Palatino
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlighten-ment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxaopQRstGMxaopQRstGg
125
![Page 126: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: TRANSITIONAL
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Perpetua
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Ba-roque, and Enlightenment periods in art and litera-ture. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in
the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify
a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art
history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to cal-
ligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries
have continued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxanopQrRtGg
126
![Page 127: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: GEOMETRIC SANS
THIN
REGULAR
HEAVY
Platelet
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letter-
forms are closely connected to cal-
ligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are
more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-
enment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-
first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic charac-
teristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letter-
forms are closely connected to cal-
ligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are
more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-
enment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-
first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic charac-
teristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: GEOMETRIC SANS
THIN
REGULAR
HEAVY
Platelet
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letter-
forms are closely connected to cal-
ligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are
more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-
enment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-
first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic charac-
teristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letter-
forms are closely connected to cal-
ligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are
more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlight-
enment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-
first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic charac-
teristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll
Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx
Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { }
? ! @ & *
MaxbyogGQrRtMxanopQrRtGg
127
![Page 128: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
REGULAR
ALTERNATE
BOLD
Priori Sans
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in
the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify
a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art
history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional
and modern typefaces are more abstract and less
organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods
in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create new
typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised
in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to
identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely
connected to calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main groups
correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Design-
ers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
128
![Page 129: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: TRANSITIONAL
REGULAR
ALTERNATE
BOLD
Priori Serif
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when printers
sought to identify a heritage for their own craft
analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-
forms are closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and modern
typefaces are more abstract and less organic.
These three main groups correspond roughly to
the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in the
twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-
tinued to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was de-
vised in the nineteenth century, when printers
sought to identify a heritage for their own craft
analogous to that of art history. Humanist let-
terforms are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and less
organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries have continued to create new type-
faces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: TRANSITIONAL
REGULAR
ALTERNATE
BOLD
Priori Serif
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised
in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to
identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to
that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely
connected to calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main groups
correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque,
and Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centu-
ries have continued to create new typefaces based
on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was de-
vised in the nineteenth century, when printers
sought to identify a heritage for their own craft
analogous to that of art history. Humanist let-
terforms are closely connected to calligraphy
and the movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and less
organic. These three main groups correspond
roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and
Enlightenment periods in art and literature.
Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first
centuries have continued to create new type-
faces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxanodQrRtSfg
129
![Page 130: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
(55) SANS
ITALIC
SERIF
ITALIC
Rotis
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renais-sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art his-tory. Humanist letterforms are closely con-nected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
130
![Page 131: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: OLD STYLE
REGULAR
SMALL CAPS
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Sabon
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ RR SS TT UU VV WW XX YY ZZ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: OLD STYLE
REGULAR
SMALL CAPS
BOLD
BOLD ITALIC
Sabon
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ RR SS TT UU VV WW XX YY ZZ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxayogGQfR
131
![Page 132: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
REGULAR
CAPS
ITALIC
BOLD
Scala Sans
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected
to calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefaces
are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in
the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected
to calligraphy and the movement of the
hand. Transitional and modern typefaces
are more abstract and less organic. These
three main groups correspond roughly to the
Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment
periods in art and literature. Designers in
the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have
continued to create new typefaces based on
historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
132
![Page 133: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: SLAB SERIF
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BLACK
Serifa
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twen-tieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: SLAB SERIF
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
BLACK
Serifa
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heri-tage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twen-tieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefac-es was devised in the nineteenth cen-tury, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analo-gous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups cor-respond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefac-es based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxaoygGdQR
133
![Page 134: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: SCRIPT
REGULAR
Snell Roundhand
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Dolessecte ver sim er aut wismod mincilit loboreet praessed tat. Iquis eu feuis dolore faci ercil eriurer sisi tet, quamconse do odolor amcom-modit vulla feugait luptatisl dolorer augait praessi. Lut vel iriuscil et luptat. Nullandre magna feugiam, quis aute conullu ptatincip ea alit wis et volore dip et, cortin henisi. Quis autet, veros accum ipit vel ute mod ting eumsandreet am, qui te faciniat num-mod eu feugiat ex essim vent vendre tat venibh et pratuer ipsum volortio eniat praessed mincilit dolobortie tat. Lam dolut amcommy nos eraessed tin ulput ut vulputat, quat, volo-bor incip et essi.orper sum quamconsed magniam, quisit accum voloborem alit iuscipit la consequam dit nulput acing eu feum quat. Ut lup-tat at.
134
![Page 135: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: NEW TRANSITIONAL
BOLD CONDENSED
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Swift
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to that
of art history. Humanist letterforms are
closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and
less organic. These three main groups cor-
respond roughly to the Renaissance, Ba-
roque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main
groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: NEW TRANSITIONAL
BOLD CONDENSED
REGULAR
ITALIC
BOLD
Swift
A basic system for classifying typefaces
was devised in the nineteenth century,
when printers sought to identify a heri-
tage for their own craft analogous to that
of art history. Humanist letterforms are
closely connected to calligraphy and the
movement of the hand. Transitional and
modern typefaces are more abstract and
less organic. These three main groups cor-
respond roughly to the Renaissance, Ba-
roque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth
and twenty-first centuries have continued
to create new typefaces based on historic
characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was
devised in the nineteenth century, when
printers sought to identify a heritage for their
own craft analogous to that of art history.
Humanist letterforms are closely connected to
calligraphy and the movement of the hand.
Transitional and modern typefaces are more
abstract and less organic. These three main
groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance,
Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art
and literature. Designers in the twentieth and
twenty-first centuries have continued to create
new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxaoygGdQrR
135
![Page 136: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
REGULAR
BOLD
BLACK
BLACK
Syntax
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the move-ment of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less or-ganic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
136
![Page 137: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
CONDENSED
MEDIUM
BOLD
BOLD NO.2
Trade Gothic
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: HUMANIST SANS
CONDENSED
MEDIUM
BOLD
BOLD NO. 2
Trade Gothic
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renais-sance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MxanyogGdQrR
137
![Page 138: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: MODERN
REGULAR
ITALIC
SMALL CAPS
BOLD
Walbaum
A basic system for classifying typefaces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letter-forms are closely connected to callig-raphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more abstract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have contin-ued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ RR SS TT UU VV WW XX YY ZZ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
138
![Page 139: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
CLASSIFICATION: NEW TRANSITIONAL
REGULAR
MEDIUM
MEDIUM ITALIC
BOLD
Volta
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are close-ly connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
CLASSIFICATION: NEW TRANSITIONAL
REGULAR
MEDIUM
MEDIUM ITALIC
BOLD
Volta
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art history. Humanist letterforms are closely connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have con-tinued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
A basic system for classifying type-faces was devised in the nineteenth century, when printers sought to identify a heritage for their own craft analogous to that of art histo-ry. Humanist letterforms are close-ly connected to calligraphy and the movement of the hand. Transitional and modern typefaces are more ab-stract and less organic. These three main groups correspond roughly to the Renaissance, Baroque, and Enlightenment periods in art and literature. Designers in the twenti-eth and twenty-first centuries have continued to create new typefaces based on historic characteristics.
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 ( ) { } ? ! @ & *
MyogGdQrR
139
![Page 140: Type](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042903/568c4b071a28ab49169a9a74/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
16 Credits.
Designed by Eric Norton. Class project for Professor
Herstowski’s Typography 02 at the University of Kan-
sas, Spring 2011. Text for the book was compiled from
the following sources: Elements of Typographic Style by
Robert Bringhurst, Getting it Right with Type: the Do’s
and Don’ts of Typography by Victoria Square, Mac is
Not A Typewriter by Robin Williams. This book is not
to be sold to the public and to only be used by the de-
signer for their reference and student design portfolio.