twitter and australian political debates

17
Twitter and Australian political debates Tim Highfield ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia t.highfield @ qut.edu.au @timhighfield http://mappingonlinepublics.net/ | http://timhighfield.net/

Upload: tim-highfield

Post on 09-May-2015

2.071 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation for DEL Colloque 'Online Political Participations and Its Critics', Paris, June 2013.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Twitter and Australian political debates

Twitter and Australian

political debates Tim Highfield

ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation

Queensland University of Technology

Brisbane, Australia

t.highfield @ qut.edu.au

@timhighfield

http://mappingonlinepublics.net/ | http://timhighfield.net/

Page 2: Twitter and Australian political debates

POLITICAL DEBATE ONLINE

• The potential for online platforms (individually and

collectively) to reshape and/or revitalise political debate

is a long-standing question

• An evolving continuum of online political discussions,

developed through blogs, citizen journalism projects,

social media

• Platforms not used in isolation; people discussing politics

online tweet about it, blog, share links, comment on

statuses…

Page 3: Twitter and Australian political debates

TWITTER AND POLITICAL DEBATE

• While not used in isolation, Twitter is a particularly

noteworthy platform for political discussion online:

– Public medium (mostly)

– Brevity of messages

– Associated features: retweets, hashtags, @mentions

• Adoption of Twitter as a popular and primary medium for

live commentary accompanying (media) events,

breaking news, activism (and combinations of these

approaches, taking place in same space).

Page 4: Twitter and Australian political debates

POLITICAL DISCUSSION ON TWITTER

• Potential for political debate to involve wider population

than just journalists and politicians?

• New gatekeepers?

• Follow and respond directly to people creating news/shaping

politics

• To what extent, though, are these different participants in

political discussions interacting – or even contributing to

the same conversations?

Page 5: Twitter and Australian political debates

METHODS

• Comparative analysis of three Australian political hashtags; data collected between January and December 2012 – #auspol – Federal

– #qldpol – Queensland

– #wapol – Western Australia

• Methods – yourTwapperkeeper captures

tweets with specified hashtags from Twitter API

– Gawk scripts for processing large datasets (Bruns & Burgess, 2011), Gephi for network visualisation

Page 6: Twitter and Australian political debates

AUSTRALIAN POLITICS

• Federal politics: currently led by centre-left Australian Labor Party (ALP), Prime Minister Julia Gillard; next election due in September 2013, expected to be won by centre-right (conservative) Liberal/National coalition, led by Tony Abbott. Voting is compulsory (93% turnout in 2010).

• State politics:

– Six states, all bicameral systems except Queensland (unicameral)

– Start of 2012: three states ALP in power, three Liberal. (Liberal-National Party took power in Queensland in March 2012).

Page 7: Twitter and Australian political debates

AUSTRALIAN POLITICS AND TWITTER

• Twitter more widely taken up – by politicians and general

public – than previous technologies such as blogging.

• Accounts established for sitting politicians

– At Federal level, 146 of 226 members of Lower and Upper

Houses present on Twitter (July 2012)

• Hashtags for different political events/broadcasts:

– #ausvotes, #ausdecides, #qldvotes – election campaigns

– #qt, #waqt – Parliamentary Question Time

– #qanda, #insiders – Q & A, Insiders political panel shows

Page 8: Twitter and Australian political debates

#AUSPOL

• Popularised around 2010 Federal election (alongside election-specific hashtags such as #ausvotes) as overarching label for Australian political topics

• Endured post-election; however, rather than a space for political debate, seen as increasingly polarised and frequented by trolls:

Viewing and participating in 'discussions' on the Twitter stream of #auspol is to immerse yourself in a political cesspit. It is the dark alley in Twitter you walk down when you wonder if you have told anyone where you were going that night.

(Jericho, 2012)

• State-based hashtags less afflicted by this development (in general)?

Page 9: Twitter and Australian political debates

#AUSPOL

– 1,002,451 tweets (15/01-04/07), 50,622 users

– 19.8 tweets per user, 5,828 tweets per day

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

20

12

-Jan

-15

20

12

-Jan

-19

20

12

-Jan

-23

20

12

-Jan

-27

20

12

-Jan

-31

20

12

-Feb

-04

20

12

-Feb

-08

20

12

-Feb

-12

20

12

-Feb

-16

20

12

-Feb

-20

20

12

-Feb

-24

20

12

-Feb

-28

20

12

-Mar

-03

20

12

-Mar

-07

20

12

-Mar

-11

20

12

-Mar

-15

20

12

-Mar

-19

20

12

-Mar

-23

20

12

-Mar

-27

20

12

-Mar

-31

20

12

-Ap

r-0

42

01

2-A

pr-

08

20

12

-Ap

r-1

22

01

2-A

pr-

16

20

12

-Ap

r-2

02

01

2-A

pr-

24

20

12

-Ap

r-2

82

01

2-M

ay-0

22

01

2-M

ay-0

62

01

2-M

ay-1

02

01

2-M

ay-1

42

01

2-M

ay-1

82

01

2-M

ay-2

22

01

2-M

ay-2

62

01

2-M

ay-3

02

01

2-J

un

-03

20

12

-Ju

n-0

72

01

2-J

un

-11

20

12

-Ju

n-1

52

01

2-J

un

-19

20

12

-Ju

n-2

32

01

2-J

un

-27

20

12

-Ju

l-0

1C

arb

on

tax

A

sylu

m s

eeke

r d

ebat

e

ALP

lead

ersh

ip s

pill

Bu

dge

t

Cra

ig T

ho

mso

n

Cra

ig T

ho

mso

n

Page 10: Twitter and Australian political debates

#QLDPOL

– 49,300 tweets (15/01-04/07), 5,668 users

– 8.7 tweets per user, 286.6 tweets per day

State election Civil partnerships bill amended

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

20

12

-Jan

-15

20

12

-Jan

-19

20

12

-Jan

-23

20

12

-Jan

-27

20

12

-Jan

-31

20

12

-Feb

-04

20

12

-Feb

-08

20

12

-Feb

-12

20

12

-Feb

-16

20

12

-Feb

-20

20

12

-Feb

-24

20

12

-Feb

-28

20

12

-Mar

-03

20

12

-Mar

-07

20

12

-Mar

-11

20

12

-Mar

-15

20

12

-Mar

-19

20

12

-Mar

-23

20

12

-Mar

-27

20

12

-Mar

-31

20

12

-Ap

r-0

4

20

12

-Ap

r-0

8

20

12

-Ap

r-1

2

20

12

-Ap

r-1

6

20

12

-Ap

r-2

0

20

12

-Ap

r-2

4

20

12

-Ap

r-2

8

20

12

-May

-02

20

12

-May

-06

20

12

-May

-10

20

12

-May

-14

20

12

-May

-18

20

12

-May

-22

20

12

-May

-26

20

12

-May

-30

20

12

-Ju

n-0

3

20

12

-Ju

n-0

7

20

12

-Ju

n-1

1

20

12

-Ju

n-1

5

20

12

-Ju

n-1

9

20

12

-Ju

n-2

3

20

12

-Ju

n-2

7

20

12

-Ju

l-0

1

Twe

ets

Date

Page 11: Twitter and Australian political debates

#WAPOL

– 21,261 tweets (15/01-26/12), 2,855 users

– 7.4 tweets per user, 61 tweets per day

Opposition leadership change

Treasurer resigns Cabinet reshuffle

Budget

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

20

12

/01

/15

20

12

/01

/22

20

12

/01

/29

20

12

/02

/05

20

12

/02

/12

20

12

/02

/19

20

12

/02

/26

20

12

/03

/04

20

12

/03

/11

20

12

/03

/18

20

12

/03

/25

20

12

/04

/01

20

12

/04

/08

20

12

/04

/15

20

12

/04

/22

20

12

/04

/29

20

12

/05

/06

20

12

/05

/13

20

12

/05

/20

20

12

/05

/27

20

12

/06

/03

20

12

/06

/10

20

12

/06

/17

20

12

/06

/24

20

12

/07

/01

20

12

/07

/08

20

12

/07

/15

20

12

/07

/22

20

12

/07

/29

20

12

/08

/05

20

12

/08

/12

20

12

/08

/19

20

12

/08

/26

20

12

/09

/02

20

12

/09

/09

20

12

/09

/16

20

12

/09

/23

20

12

/09

/30

20

12

/10

/07

20

12

/10

/14

20

12

/10

/21

20

12

/10

/28

20

12

/11

/04

20

12

/11

/11

20

12

/11

/18

20

12

/11

/25

20

12

/12

/02

20

12

/12

/09

20

12

/12

/16

20

12

/12

/23

Twe

ets

Date

Pre-election

Page 12: Twitter and Australian political debates

WHO IS TWEETING?

– Highly active group of users within #auspol hashtag:

• Top 1% users contribute 64% of tweets

• 6 users responsible for 87,696 tweets

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

all 50662 users users > 0% (>= 0tweets; 45514 of

50662 users)

users > 90% (>= 14tweets; 4639 of 50662

users)

users > 99% (>= 297tweets; 510 of 50662

users)

Sum of original tweets

Sum of genuine @replies

Sum of retweets

Page 13: Twitter and Australian political debates

WHO IS TWEETING? #AUSPOL

– Highly active group of users within #auspol hashtag:

• These especially active users not elected parliamentarians or

journalists

• Instead, politically engaged citizens (or automated accounts)

– Fit Coleman’s (2006) description of “political junkies”,

who treat political issues as major topics of interest and

actively seek out relevant news and opinion pieces?

– MPs, journalists, media organisations mentioned often in

tweets

• However, these accounts (especially politicians) do not

contribute many tweets to the #auspol discussion

Page 14: Twitter and Australian political debates

WHO IS TWEETING? #QLDPOL

– Tweeting patterns also show a core group of users contributing the majority of hashtagged tweets

• Some overlap with the prominent #auspol users.

– The users that are most mentioned are a mixture of these frequent contributors and key state political actors, who do not necessarily participate in these discussions themselves.

• Limits to this analysis due to election in first half of 2012; user names, and affiliations, changed (including @TheQldPremier)

• Further analysis required to establish on-going patterns beyond the election context.

Page 15: Twitter and Australian political debates

WHO IS TWEETING? #WAPOL

– A lower level of activity, but greater representation

amongst most mentioned and also most active accounts

by journalists and politicians

• A more even spread of – and comparable contributions from

– citizens (including the “political junkies”), journalists, and

politicians alike.

– Changing patterns towards end of year as election

campaigns are readied

• Party strategies regarding social media have some impact on

the developing shape of tweeted political debates

Page 16: Twitter and Australian political debates

WHO IS TWEETING?

– Politicians in particular often mentioned a lot, but rarely contribute to hashtagged debates

• @mentions as a shorthand for discussing politicians, creating a link to their account, rather than necessarily expecting conversation

– Presence of core group of “political junkies” leading (in volume if not in topic) these discussions

• Framing of politics around personalities (individual politicians) rather than parties?

• Tweeting patterns still follow major news stories, debates around party leaders (particularly in hung parliament situation, in build-up to election).

Page 17: Twitter and Australian political debates

LIMITATIONS AND FURTHER OUTLOOK

• Caveats: – Not all voters on Twitter - not representative of entire electorate

– No requirement to use hashtag/engage with others using it • Active choice by user to connect to wider discussion

• Users replying to hashtagged comments might not include it in their tweets

• Intentions of hashtags, functions of use

• Future directions – Case studies within the different political contexts

– Replies and retweets, information flows, across party affiliation, between different user groups (journalists, politicians), regions, themes

• Ongoing tracking, comparing non-election and election periods (QLD 2012; WA and AUS 2013).