turbulence near the reverse surface measured by microwave
TRANSCRIPT
Turbulence near the reverse surface measured by microwave imaging
reflectometry on TPE-RX
Shi Zhongbing(石中兵) 1), Y. Nagayama2), S. Yamaguchi2), Y. Hamada2)Y. Hirano3), S. Kiyama3), H. Koguchi3), H. Sakakita3), K. Yambe3)
Y. kogi4), A. Mase 4)
1)The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Toki, Japan, 2) National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan 3) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan4) KASTEC, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Japan
E-mail: [email protected]
2
ωne
r/a
Reflectometry
Microwave Imaging Reflectometry (MIR)
• Motivation: 2D imaging of the fluctuation, just like a photograph.
• MIR is based on the radar technique– Microwave is reflected at the cutoff surface,
we can get the phase difference– The phase fluctuation is dominated by the
density fluctuation close to the cutoff surface
– Local measurement• However, the fluctuation is 2D or 3D
which lead to interference at the detector surface
• The optical lens can restore phase front• MIR uses large-lens optical imaging.
– Experimental verification, TEXROR, LHD,...– Simulations (Princeton PPL and KASTEC)
)( cute rnδδφ ∝
Lead to interference
Optical lensDensity fluctuation
Phase fluctuation
δne δφ
Antenna
The density fluctuation can be restored at the detector surface by
the mirror system
3
TPE-RX
• TPE-RX: R / a = 1.72m / 0.45m. • TPE-RX: Reverse field pinch• RFP device is characteristic of a reverse
toroidal field in the outer region.• Bϕ~Bθ , q<<1.• RFP configuration is obtained as a result
of MHD relaxation and sustained by dynamo-effect.
TEP-RX
•Plasma current : Ip ~ 300 kA•Plasma density:
ne~(0.6-1.0)*1e19 m-3
•Pinch parameter: Q = Bpw/<Bt> ~ 1.5-2
•Reversed parameter:F = Btw/<Bt>~-0.16-1
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Magnetic field profileand q profile
Mag
netic
fiel
d pr
ofile
q profile
r/a
q=(rBtoro)/(RBpolo)
Bpolo
Btoro
Btoro(1)<0
reverse toroidal field
4
Bϕ Bθ
MIR system on TPE-RX
•O-mode is used (Bθ>>Bϕ, ρ>0.5 )
•The cutoff density: nc=0.5x1019m-3
•-Spatial resolution : 3.7cm,-Time resolution: 1μs / 0.5μs.
4X4 antenna
2D(4X4) antenna array
Optical system
Beam splitter
Main mirror
win
dow
5
A>1: hollow profile
A<1: center peak profile
n e(r
)/ne(
0)
Cutoff radius
The cutoff surface is close to the reverse field surface during PPCD.
The large mode numbers near by the reverse surface.
)1)(1)(0()( 44 Arrnrn ee +−=
Electron density profile is obtained by
A is the profile factor
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.00.20.40.60.8
Cut
off s
urfa
cem=1, n=7n=8
n=9
r
Bt(r
)
prob
e (r
=1.0
5)
n e(1
E19m
-3) PPCD
ω
20GHz
The electron density profile is measured using a dual-chord interferometer and the normalized radius are 0.0 and 0.69, respectively.
The typical plasma density profile is flat or hollow. If ne(r)> nc, the cutoff surface is at the plasma edge
MIR
6
PPCD
Pulsed Poloidal Current Drive(PPCD) plasma
•The soft-X-ray intensity increase rapidly during PPCD•The cutoff radius is about 0.9 •The amplitude of the density fluctuation increases during PPCD
Lissajous’ curve of I-Q signalsIQ circle: fluctuation of the cutoffOne circle: 1.5cm
-0 .6
-0 .4
-0 .2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
-1 .5 -1 -0 .5 0 0 .5 1 1 .5
52973IQ 25 .504 -25.556m s
Q(a
.u.)
I(a .u .)
(a)
50us window
IQ: sine and cosine components of density fluctuations
7
1 10 100 1000f(kHz)
10-6
10-5
10-4
P(a.
u.)
Plasma
(25-30ms)
No plasma
(40-45ms)
f-3.2
f-1.8f-0
Power spectrum
The spectrum shows three distinct frequency ranges, each with characteristic power dependence
The power spectrum shows the power law decay like f-2 in the frequency range 70-200 kHz and f-3~4 in the frequency of 300-700 kHz.
The decay index (f-a) of the power spectrum represents a qualitative indication of an energy exchange process between fluctuations at different scales
8
1 8 16 23 30k(m-1)
0
50
100
150
200
V(k
ms-1
)
toroidal velocity(SH53330)
At low k (k<16m-1), phase velocity keeps constant (about 50km/s).
The velocity is about 3 times lower than the ion sound speed.
The phase velocity increase rapidly at high k.
The phase shift has linear tread at f<200kHz, which means a constant phase velocity.
But at f>200kHz, the phase almost doesn't change which means the fluctuation has a constant wavenumber
0 2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 00.0
0.5
1.0co
here
nce
0 200 400 600 800 1000f(kHz)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
phas
e(ra
d)
Noise level
9
toroidal velocity (low k)
45
50
55
60
65
260 265 270 275 280 285
V(km/s)
V(k
m/s
)
Ip(kA)
45
50
55
60
65
0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95
V(km/s)
V(k
m/s
)
ρ
45
50
55
60
65
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1
V(km/s)
V(k
m/s
)
Nea(1019m-3)
Radial scanning by changing plasma density.
The cutoff moves to outside with the increase of density, close to the reverse surface.
The phase velocity sharply decrease at rho~0.9 which suggests a velocity shear around the reverse region.
0
20
40
60
80
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
|Vϕ|
(km
/s)
ρ
MIR (ne) GPI (Dα)
Doppler (C4+)
10
Phase-frequency spectrum
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
phase shift
0
200
400
600
f(kH
z)
0 1 2 3 4
- 1
0
1
2
-1
0
1
2
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
phase shift
0
200
400
600
f(kH
z)
0 1 2 3 4
- 1
0
1
2
-1
0
1
2
The fluctuation is dominated by f < 200kHz and k<20/m.
The spectrum shows linearly trend which means a constant phase velocity at low k fluctuation.
It becomes saturated at high k fluctuation.
The fluctuations propagate in the electron drift direction.
Toroidal Poloidal
1 2
3
Bt
BpB
ion
electron
Ip
11
Toroidal coherence length
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 5 10 15
Coherence length (53330, ρ=0.8)
30kHz80kHz130kHz180kHz230kHz
280kHz330kHz380kHz430kHz480kHz
γ
Δx(cm)
k=5m-1
k=20m-1
The toroidal correlation length is defined as the separation for which the coherence has decreased to 1/e.
The toroidal correlation length has a negative correlation with the wavenumber (k)
The correlation length is about 10-30cm for low k fluctuation.
The correlation length is about 3cm for high k fluctuation.
The fluctuations at different scales have different coherence length, which suggest multi-wave in PPCD plasma.
The correlation length is obtained by averaging cross-correlation over different pairs of channels
12
Maximum Entropy Method (MEM)
Reference: Jae S. Lim and Naveed A. Malik. IEEE trans. on acoustics, speech, and signal proc., Vol. Assp-29, No.3 June, 1981.
Iteratively solve for aij:
The definition of entropy is given as:
Rx is the Fourier transform of the cross-correlation function.
Generally, the detector size is smaller than the correlation length.
It is the similar as a filter used in the cross-correlation matrix.
where, aij is the autoregressive filter coefficients to be estimated.
The correlation matrix is obtained by averaging cross-correlation over different pairs of channels
No. of cross-correlation
13
Difference
γ
x
FFT window
w
k
∝1/w
2D FFT
γ
x
w
k
∝1/w
MEM
Size of image in plasma is limited by narrow port.
coherence does not go to zero
broadening is due to finite beam width
Image is extrapolated using high resolution 2D power spectrum estimation techniques
Max Entropy extends correlation measurements outside measured region
Max Entropy method FFT method
14
power spectrum
0 2 4 6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0 1 2 3 4
0 . 0
0 . 2
0 . 4
0 . 6
0 . 8
1 . 0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 2 4 6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0 1 2 3 4
- 0 . 2
0 . 0
0 . 2
-0.2
0.0
0.2
Real part of cross-correlation Imag. part of cross-correlation
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
kx
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
k y
0 1 2 3 4
2
4
6
8
1 0
2
4
6
8
10
Traditional FFT method
•The spectrum only shows a broadening pattern by FFT.
•The high k fluctuation is affected by the low k.
•FFT method failed to resolve the spectral peaks
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
kx
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
k y
0 1 2 3 4
- 5 . 5
- 5 . 0
- 4 . 5
- 4 . 0
- 3 . 5
-5.5
-5.0
-4.5
-4.0
-3.5
Lim & Malik MEM
15
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
kx
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
k y
0 1 2 3 4
- 6
- 4
-6
-4
Shot, 53330, PPCD, Rcut=0.75-0.9, f=290±20kHz
m=-1±1m=0
m=9±4 n=4±2
n=30±2n=-28±1
n=-95±3
m=-17±1
toroidal
Pol
oida
l
Power spectrum estimated by Lim & Malik MEM
•Measurement ranges:
|k| < 85m-1,
|m|/|n| < 34/146.
•The k is normalized by 0.037/π.
•Multi- modes are obtained by MEM. Note that some of them might be caused by the aliasing or the power is too low.
•The high toroidal k is poloidally elongated due to too less channels in poloidal direction
sidelobe?
16
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
kx
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
k y
0 1 2 3 4
- 6
- 4
-6
-4
Shot, 53330, PPCD, Rcut=0.75-0.9, f=290±20kHz
m=-1±1m=0
m=9±4
n=4±2
n=30±2n=-28±1
n=-95±3
m=-17±1
toroidal
Pol
oida
l
Inside of reverse surface
Reflective signal can be significantly influenced by the waves away from the cutoff layer, whose amplitude is sufficiently large. the spatial resolution becomes poor.
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.00.20.40.60.8
Cut
off s
urfa
cem=1, n=7n=8
n=9
r
Bt(r
)
prob
e (r
=1.0
5)
n e(1
E19m
-3)
ω
20GHz
Bp
Bt
Outside of reverse surface
17
Fluctuation structure
Skewness (S) and Kurtosis (K):
3~/~
~/~
224
2/323
−><>=<
><>=<
xxK
xxS
The skewness and kurtosis are used to describe the asymmetry and peak degrees of a distribution with respect to its mean value, respectively.
For a Gaussian random distribution, S=K=0.
There is no interaction of ambient turbulence if S=K=0 for all frequency components.
A non-Gaussian tail means the existence of coherent structures or intermittency of ambient turbulence.
-0.3-0.2-0.1
00.10.20.3
00.20.40.60.811.2
0 200 400 600 800 1000
53330, PPCD, 20-33ms
SkewnessKurtosisSk
ewne
ss Kurtosis
f(kHz)
The fluctuations at different frequencies are identified by the band pass filter (BPF)
The fluctuation shows positive bursts at low frequency (f<150kHz) and negative bursts at high frequency (f>150kHz).
The dominant burst frequency is <600kHz
18
0 200 400 600 800 1000
f1(kHz)
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
f 2(kH
z)
0 1 2 3 4
1 . 9 3 × 1 0 - 8
9 . 5 4 × 1 0 - 6
1 . 9 1 × 1 0 - 5
2 . 8 6 × 1 0 - 5
3 . 8 1 × 1 0 - 5
1.93×10-8
9.54×10-6
1.91×10-5
2.86×10-5
3.81×10-5
Three wave coupling
sum of bicoherenceSimilar trends appear in the bicoherence and
kurtosis.
The kurtosis and skewness have reverse trends.
The bicoherence has a broad profile between 200-500kHz, which represents the existence of nonlinear coupling (k~20m-1).
The bicoherence has stronger dependence on the skewness and the kurtosis.
The local peaks of bicoherence are about 300kHz, 400kHz and 800kHz.
The local peak of skewness is about 300kHz while the local peak of kurtosis is about 180kHz.
The different local peaks suggest existence of nonlinear multi-wave interaction.-0.3
-0.2-0.1
00.10.20.3
00.20.40.60.811.2
0 200 400 600 800 1000
53330, PPCD, 20-33ms
SkewnessKurtosisS
kew
ness K
urtosis
f(kHz)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 200 400 600 800 1000
b2
100*
b2
f(kHz)
19
Summary
Two-dimensional electron density fluctuation have been measured by microwave imaging reflectometry (MIR) on TPE-RX.
The measurements confirm several important properties of plasma edge turbulence, such as velocity shear, k and intermittency.
The phase velocity is about 50km/s at low k fluctuations, which propagate in the electron drift direction.
The fluctuation structures are quantified by skewness and kurtosis.
The power spectrum is estimated by the Lim & Malik maximum entropy method (MEM), which shows the existence of multi-modes close to reverse region.
The m=0 and m=1 modes has a reverse toroidal propagation direction
The different local peaks of bicoherence, skewness and kurtosis suggest nonlinear multi-wave interactions.
21
Skilling MEM
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
kx
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
k y
0 1 2 3 4
- 6
- 4
-6
-4Lim & Malik MEM
f~290kHz
Malik MEM has sidelobeproblem and convergence problem. It gives spurious peaks and distorts the spectrum sometimes.
Skilling MEM shows a continuous and a more reliable spectrum. But it fails to solvethe low k modes.
Small difference in the toroidal direction, but large difference in the poloidaldirection.
22
Quasi-single helicity (QSH) plasma
Ns = 2 at 35-47ms. The dominate mode is m=1,
n=6 during QSH stateThe cutoff radius is about 0.75
during QSH
00.0050.01
0.0150.02
0.0250.03 nAmp m1/ 5
nAmp m1/ 6nAmp m1/ 7nAmp m1/ 8nAmp m1/ 9
nAm
p m
1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Nea(r=0)Nea(r=0.69)
rc/a
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
n e(1019
m-3
)
rc /a
time (s)
12345678 Shot 52754
NsBtm1 6-15NsBtm0 1-10
Ns
12
' '
−
⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢
⎣
⎡∑ ⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
∑= n
n n
ns W
WN
The quality of the QSH state can be estimated by
where, Wn is the energy of the (m=0 or 1) mode.
Ns=1 SH stateNs<3 QSH state Ns>3 MH state
MH QSH
23
Fluctuation structure (QSH)
0
10
20
30
40
0
10
20
30
40
0 100 200 300 400 500
K_QSH
K_MH
K_Q
SH K
_MH
f(kHz)
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
S_QSH
S_MH
S_Q
SH S
_MH
f(kHz)
0 2 0 4 0 6 0
0 .7 00 .8 00 .9 01 .0 0
QSHMH
3 0 .0 3 0 .5 3 1 .0 3 1 .5t (m s)
0 .60 .81 .0
MIR
(a.u
.)
MH4 0 .0 4 0 .5 4 1 .0 4 1 .5
t (m s)
0 .60 .81 .0
MIR
(a.u
.)
QSH
The fluctuations versus frequency are identified by the band pass filter
QSH shows a more intermittent behavior (around 200-400kHz)