tunnel_lining_design.pdf

Upload: hiimruju

Post on 14-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    1/47

    AGS/IMM Technical Meeting 2002 onAGS/IMM Technical Meeting 2002 on

    Underground Excavation in Urban EnvironmentUnderground Excavation in Urban Environment

    Principles of Tunnel Lining DesignPrinciples of Tunnel Lining Design

    Dr. Morgan W. W. YangDr. Morgan W. W. Yang

    MaunsellMaunsell GeotechnicalGeotechnical Services Ltd.Services Ltd.

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    2/47

    Basics

    GROUND

    equilibrium compatibility

    SUPPORTS

    InteractionInteraction

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    3/47

    Tunneling is An ArtGROUND

    PLANNING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION

    TUNNELING

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    4/47

    Interaction Among Planning Studiesand Design Process

    P

    D

    S

    PLANNINGPLANNING

    FINANCIAL

    PROJECTLOGISTICS

    LAYOUT

    OPERATION

    STUDIESSTUDIES

    GROUND

    DEMANDACCESS

    AD HOC

    DESIGNDESIGN

    PERMANENT SUPPORTS

    TEMPORARY SUPPORTS

    METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION

    MEANS OF CONSTRUCTION

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    5/47

    Tunneling ProcedureTunneling ProcedureSite investigation

    Line and orientation of the tunnel

    Ground characteristics:Primary stress, strength, water

    Fissures, anisotropy, etc

    Excavation method

    Structural method

    Statical system analysis

    Design criteria

    Yes No

    Driving the tunnel

    In situ monitoring:

    deformations stop?

    Yes No

    By pass

    Geology

    Geotechnical

    investigations

    Experience,

    estimation

    Mechanical model

    Safety concept, failure hypothese

    Risk assessment

    Field

    measurements

    For actual state only,Unknown safety margin

    Safe

    Concept aspects

    After H. Duddeck, Guidelines for the design of tunnels

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    6/47

    Options for TunnelingA. M. Muir Wood (2000), Tunnelling: Management by design

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ground type Excavation Support

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Strong rock Drill-&-blast or TBM Nil or rockbolts +

    Weak rock TBM or roadheader Rockbolts, shorcrete etc.

    Squeezing rock Roadheader Varity of means of support

    depending on conditions

    OC clay Open-face shielded TBM Segmental lining or

    roadheader shotcrete etc.

    Weak clay, EPB closed-face machine Segmental lining

    silty clay

    Sands, gravels Closed-face slurry machine Segmental lining

    Stro

    nger

    sup

    port

    Stro

    nger

    sup

    portS

    tron

    ger

    ground

    Stron

    ger

    ground

    After A. M. Muir Wood (2000), Tunnelling: Management by design

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    7/47

    Development of Design Model-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. Research model Explanation of phenomena

    Study actual loads and materials

    Analysis of parametersEstablishing correspondence between

    theory and experiment

    2. Technical model Developed for practical design

    Selection of dominant factors

    Idealization of loading, physical

    characteristics and safety criteriaNo attempt precisely to model reality

    Lack of precise correspondence between

    theory and full scale test accepted

    After A. M. Muir Wood (2000), Tunnelling: Management by design

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    8/47

    Types of Ground Model-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. Geological structure Fundamentally a descriptive model which establishes

    limits of variability of salient factors

    2. As (1) + simple RQD or similar simplified representation of rockqualitative factors quality or selected relevant parameters for soil

    3. As (2) + monitoring Simplest basis for informal support

    4. As (3) + quantitative Adequate for analysis based on continuum-

    discontinuum or on elasto-plastic models of

    increasing complexity

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After A. M. Muir Wood (2000), Tunnelling: Management by design

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    9/47

    Fundamental of TunnelingFundamental of Tunneling

    Stress States of Ground

    Initial TertiarySecondary

    Convergence-Confinement

    NMT TBM

    NATM

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    10/47

    Characteristics of GroundCharacteristics of Ground

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    11/47

    Elastic Solution of Initial StressesElastic Solution of Initial Stresses

    y

    z

    x

    x

    z

    y

    x=y

    x

    y

    y

    Ground surface

    0=

    +

    yx

    xyx

    rxy

    xyx =+

    0)(2 =+ yx

    Governing Equations SolutionsGoverning Equations Solutions

    ryy =

    yxz

    ==1

    y

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    12/47

    Elastic Solution of Secondary StressesElastic Solution of Secondary Stresses

    KirschKirschs solutionss solutions

    [ ])2cos()1)(341()1)(1(2

    1 422 +++= yr

    [ ])2cos()1)(31()1)(1(2

    1 42 +++=

    y

    [ ])2sin()1)(321(2

    1 42 +=

    yr

    x=ya

    r

    r

    y

    r

    a

    a

    r=

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    13/47

    Radial Stress DistributionRadial Stress Distribution

    KirschKirschs solutionss solutions

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    r/a

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    r

    /y

    Radial stress

    =1.5, =90 deg.

    =1.0, =90 deg.

    =0.5, =90 deg.

    =0.0, =90 deg.

    r=5a

    =1.5

    =1

    =0.5

    =0

    r

    Ste

    Radial distance

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    14/47

    Tangential Stress DistributionTangential Stress Distribution

    KirschKirschs solutionss solutions

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    r/a

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    /y

    Tangential stress

    =1.5, =90 deg.

    =1.0, =90 deg.

    =0.5, =90 deg.

    =0.0, =90 deg.

    r=5a

    =1.5, 1, 0.5, 0

    Ste

    Radial distance

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    15/47

    Secondary Stress StatesSecondary Stress States

    At the periphery of the opening :Only tangential stress but zero radial stress

    Biaxial stress state => uni-axial stress state

    1

    3

    1

    3

    Failu

    reline

    Rb

    Coulomb Criteria

    0

    A BBA

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    16/47

    Plastic Solutions of Secondary StressesPlastic Solutions of Secondary Stresses

    c

    0 Rb prp

    )1/(1

    0

    )1(

    1

    2

    +

    +=

    b

    by

    R

    Rar

    =

    11

    1

    a

    rRbrp

    1

    20 +

    =

    by

    r

    R

    =

    11

    1

    a

    rRbp

    sin1

    sin1

    +

    =

    r0

    a

    y

    r0

    Elastic zone

    Plastic zone

    Mohr CoulombMohr CoulombModelModel

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    17/47

    Radius of Plastic ZoneRadius of Plastic Zone

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8y /Rb

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    r0

    /a

    Plastic zone

    =1, =25 deg.

    =1, =30 deg.

    =1, =35 deg.

    =1, =40 deg.

    =1, =50 deg.

    =1, =60 deg.

    =1, =70 deg.

    =1, =80 deg.

    =250

    =300

    =350

    =400

    =500

    r0

    a

    y

    r0

    Elastic zone

    Plastic zone

    lactyRau

    Initial stress

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    18/47

    Stress Distribution (Stress Distribution (=1)=1)

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    r/a

    0.0

    0.3

    0.5

    0.8

    1.0

    1.3

    1.5

    1.8

    2.0

    /

    y

    Elastic solution: r

    Plastic solution (=25 deg, 0/R

    b =1): r

    Elastic solution:

    Plastic solution (=25 deg, 0/R

    b =1):

    Plastic solution (=25 deg, 0/R

    b =2):

    Plastic solution (=25 deg, 0/R

    b =2): r

    0=Rb

    0=2Rbr=5a

    r0

    a

    y

    r0

    Elastic zone

    Plastic zone

    Radial Stress

    Tangential StressSte

    Radial distance

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    19/47

    Solutions of Tertiary StressesSolutions of Tertiary Stresses

    a

    b

    rp pa

    r

    a

    rR11

    11

    +

    =

    ab

    p pa

    r

    a

    rR11

    11

    +

    =

    )1/(1

    0)1()1(

    12

    ++

    +=

    ba

    by

    RpRar

    1

    2))(

    1

    2

    1

    2(

    1

    +

    ++

    =

    r

    aRRp b

    yb

    a

    )1/(2

    0)1()1(

    12)()1(

    + +++=

    ba

    byrya

    RpR

    Eu

    r0

    a

    y

    r0

    Elastic zone

    Plastic zone

    pa

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    20/47

    Characteristic Curve of GroundCharacteristic Curve of Ground

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    P

    a/y

    y/R b =2, =35 deg

    y/R b =2.8, =35 deg

    y=2.8Rb

    y=2Rb

    y=0.5Rbr0

    a

    y

    r0

    Elastic zone

    Plastic zone

    pa

    Su

    pe

    0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0[E/(1+u)Rb]*(u

    a/a)

    0.0

    0.9

    1.0

    Characteristic curve

    y/R b =0.5, =35 deg

    Radial displacement

    sue

    T i l Ch t i ti C f G dTypical Characteristic Curve of Ground

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    21/47

    Typical Characteristic Curve of GroundTypical Characteristic Curve of Ground

    ua

    A

    Elastic Plastic stable ground

    pa

    C

    D

    Ground loosening pressureGround loosening pressureGround deformation pressure

    0

    uamax

    Pamin

    B

    Initial stress of groundInitial stress of ground

    Plastic unstable ground

    Su

    peue

    Radial displacementElastic deformation => Development of plastic zone => InitiationElastic deformation => Development of plastic zone => Initiation of instabilityof instability

    CC C fi t M th dC fi t M th d

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    22/47

    ConvergenceConvergence--Confinement MethodConfinement Method

    ua

    pa

    Characteristic curve of ground

    0ua1

    Pa1

    ua0

    Characteristic curve of support

    Psmax

    1. Limit convergence to acceptable values, compatible with

    excavation and the ultimate purpose of the structure

    2. Control decompression of the surrounding ground, whichalways leads to a serious deterioration in its mechanical

    properties

    3. Optimize support quantities and cost by applying onlyenough confining pressure to keep convergence within

    acceptable limits

    Radial displacementSu

    peue

    F d t l P i i l f NATMFundamental Principles of NATM

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    23/47

    Fundamental Principles of NATMFundamental Principles of NATM

    1. Maintain strength of the rock mass

    Avoid detrimental loosening by careful excavation and by immediateapplication of support and strengthening means. Shotcrete and rockbolts

    applied close to the excavation face help to maintain the rock mass.

    2. Rounded tunnel shapes

    Avoid stress concentrations in corners where progressive failure

    mechanisms start.

    Fundamental Principles of NATMFundamental Principles of NATM

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    24/47

    Fundamental Principles of NATMFundamental Principles of NATM

    3. Flexible thin liningThe primary support shall be flexible in order

    to minimise bending moments and to

    facilitate the stress rearrangement process

    without exposing the lining to unfavourable

    sectional forces. Additional support

    requirement shall not be added by increasing

    lining thickness but by bolting.

    4. In situ measurements

    Observation of tunnel behaviour during

    construction is an integral part of NATM.

    With the monitoring and interpretation of

    deformations, strains and stresses it is

    possible to optimise working procedures and

    support requirements.

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    25/47

    New Austrian Tunneling MethodThe NATM constitutes a method where the surrounding rock

    or soil formations of a tunnel are integrated into an overall

    ring-like support support structure. Thus the formations willthemselves be part of this supporting structure.

    Behavior of ground massBehavior of ground mass

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    26/47

    Behavior of ground massBehavior of ground mass

    1. Ground mass is the most important material for

    the stability of a tunnel.

    Tates Cairn Tunnel, HK

    Behavior of ground massBehavior of ground mass

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    27/47

    Behavior of ground massBehavior of ground mass

    2. Tunnel support contributes mostly by providing

    a measure of confinement.

    Copenhagen Metro

    FE model of ground-lining interaction

    Behavior of ground massBehavior of ground mass

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    28/47

    Behavior of ground massBehavior of ground mass

    3. A lining placed in an excavated opening in an

    elastic rock mass at the time that 70% of alllatent motion has taken place will experience

    stresses from release of the remaining 30% of

    displacement.

    Lining segments

    Segmental lining of

    Copenhagen MetroFE Model to simulate

    the installation of se ments

    Schematic supportSchematic support vsvs deformation during excavationdeformation during excavation

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    29/47

    and support installationand support installation

    u

    1

    a

    D0

    Initial ground stressInitial ground stress

    Su

    peue

    2Ground state at time of temp support installedGround state at time of temp support installed

    3Ground state at time of temp support to loadGround state at time of temp support to load

    4

    5Ground state at time of perm support to loadGround state at time of perm support to load

    6Equilibrium and compatibilityEquilibrium and compatibility

    a

    p

    Radial displacement

    Ground state at time of perm support installedGround state at time of perm support installed

    Analytical methodsAnalytical methods

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    30/47

    Analytical methodsAnalytical methods

    Elastic closed form solutions Beam-spring models Beam-continuum models Empirical techniques

    Active loads

    Ground reactions

    (passive load at

    interaction zone)

    Lining deformation profile

    Proof

    Pwall

    Pinvert

    Tunnel Lining Design Model 1Tunnel Lining Design Model 1

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    31/47

    Tunnel Lining Design Model 1Tunnel Lining Design Model 1

    Rh=0v

    v=H

    H

    Full overburden spring modelFull overburden spring model

    Tunnel Lining Design Model 2Tunnel Lining Design Model 2

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    32/47

    Tunnel Lining Design Model 2Tunnel Lining Design Model 2

    R

    h

    v

    H

    Two dimensional continuum modelTwo dimensional continuum model

    Tunnel Lining Design Model 3Tunnel Lining Design Model 3

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    33/47

    Tunnel Lining Design Model 3Tunnel Lining Design Model 3

    R

    h

    v

    H

    h

    Active ground pressure derived fromActive ground pressure derived fromthree dimensional analysisthree dimensional analysis

    Tunnel Lining Design Model 4Tunnel Lining Design Model 4

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    34/47

    Tunnel Lining Design Model 4Tunnel Lining Design Model 4

    R

    h

    v

    Empirical approachEmpirical approach

    Design for different conditionsDesign for different conditions

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    35/47

    gg1. Section with the deepest overburden

    2. Section with the shallowest overburden3. Section with the highest groundwater table

    4. Section with the lowest groundwater table

    5. Section with maximum surcharge

    6. Section with eccentric loads

    7. Section with future development

    8. Soft ground section

    9. Mixed ground section

    Reservoir

    Load factors and loading combinationsLoad factors and loading combinations

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    36/47

    gg

    1. Particular environment and behavior

    of underground structure

    2. Carefully evaluate design load cases

    and factors for each tunnel design

    3. Rock loads to be derived from rock-structure interaction assessments

    Construction methods and stagesConstruction methods and stages

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    37/47

    gg

    1. Drill and blast method2. Mechanized method

    3. NATM4. NMT

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    38/47

    TBM Tunnels

    TBM

    E. P. B. M.

    for soil

    Open TBM

    for rock

    Shielded TBM

    for weak rock

    Slurry TBM

    for soil

    Shield TBMShield TBM

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    39/47

    Immediate Ground SupportImmediate Ground Support

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    40/47

    Immediate Ground SupportImmediate Ground Support

    Annular void grouting to

    control and restrict

    settlement at surface and

    to securely block the lining

    ring in position

    Cutterhead chamber

    Segmental lining with annular groutTBM shield

    Evolution of settlements along a shield

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    41/47

    Evolution of settlements along a shield

    Distance

    spme

    Cutterhead and shield Segmental lining with annular grout

    Face

    d1: settlement caused by the face

    d2: settlement caused by the overcut

    d : settlement induced by

    post shied/grout loss

    d4

    3

    settlement induced by lining

    deflection and long-termsettlement

    Design Steps for TBM tunnelsDesign Steps for TBM tunnels

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    42/47

    Step 1: Define geometric parameters

    Alignment, excavation diameter, lining diameter,

    lining thickness, width of ring, segment system,

    joint connections

    Step 2: Determine geotechnical data

    Shear strength of soil, deformation modulus,

    earth pressure coefficient

    Step 3: Select critical sections

    Influence of overburden, surcharge,groundwater, adjacent structures

    Design Steps for TBM tunnelsDesign Steps for TBM tunnels

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    43/47

    Step 4: Determine mechanical data of TBM

    Total thrust pressure, number of thrusts,

    number of pads, pad dimensions, grouting

    pressure, space for installation

    Step 5: Define material properties

    Concrete: strength, elastic modulus

    Reinforcement: type, strength

    Gasket: type, dimensions, elasticity

    Step 6: Design loadsSoil pressure, water pressure, construction loads

    Design Steps for TBM tunnelsDesign Steps for TBM tunnels

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    44/47

    Step 7: Design models

    Empirical model, analytical model, numerical

    model

    Step 8: Computational results

    Response: axial force, moment, shearDeformation: deflection

    Detailing: reinforcement, joints, groove

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    45/47

    DoubleDouble--O TunnelsO Tunnels

    Multi-Circular Face Shield Tunneling

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    46/47

    Multi Circular Face Shield Tunneling

    Double-O Tunnels H&V Shield TunnelH&V Shield Tunnel

    Assembly of Precast Segments

  • 7/27/2019 Tunnel_Lining_Design.pdf

    47/47

    y g

    Assembly of Segments Perspective View of TunnelPerspective View of Tunnel