tuesday, october 4, 2016 9:00 a.m. ccrpc office, 110 west ... · transportation advisory committee...

CHITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE - AGENDA

DATE: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 TIME: 9:00 a.m. PLACE: CCRPC Office, 110 West Canal St. Winooski DELIBERATIVE AGENDA: 1. Action on Consent Agenda 9:00 - 9:05

N/A this month.

2. Minutes of September 6, 2016 – (Action Item) 9:05 - 9:10 See attached. 3. Public Comment Period (Information item) 9:10 - 9:15

Members of the public are invited to raise issues of interest or concern to the TAC on items not on the agenda.

4. Malletts Bay Stormwater Project Consultant Selection (Action Item) 9:15 – 9:30 This is a project to make Green Storm Water Infrastructure, (GSI) improvements and create other strategies, designed to reduce storm water discharges and pollution into Malletts Bay. It will also integrate transportation improvements in the project area including a separated multi-use path and a signalized intersection reconstruction. Proposals were due 9/23 and staff seeks TAC permission to authorize the evaluation committee to make the consultant selection. More information on the attached memo.

5. Strategic Highway Safety Plan Update (Information Item) 9:30 – 9:50 This document provides a comprehensive framework to reduce traffic fatalities and injuries and establish goals,

objectives and emphasis areas. VTrans is currently updating the plan and will give an update. 6. Shelburne Form Based Code - Consultant Selection (action Item) 9:50 – 10:00 See attached memo describing the project and proposal review process. 7. Active Transportation Plan (ATP) Update (Information Item) 10:00 – 10:15 Since the last ATP TAC update in March, a draft final plan has been prepared and distributed for comments. A

link to the draft is here: http://www.ccrpcvt.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/CC_ATP_FinalDraftPlanAugust2016.pdf and a large scale map of the recommended network here: http://www.ccrpcvt.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2016-08-22_PriorityFeasibility.pdf Staff will give an update and describe the draft recommendations.

8. CIRC ROW Management Plan (Information Item) 10:15 – 10:30 VTrans recently issued this document regarding the right-of-way plans for the Circumferential Highway. VTrans staff will

give an update. See attached report. 9. Status of Projects and Subcommittee Reports (Information Item) 10:30 – 10:40

See bulleted list on the reverse for current CCRPC projects. TAC members are encouraged to ask staff for more information on the status of any of these on-going or recently completed projects.

10. CCRPC September Board Meeting Report (Information Item) 10:40 – 10:45 The Board met on September 21st getting a presentation on the Active Transportation Plan and the schedule for the MTP update.

11. Chairman’s/Members’ Items (Information Item) 10:45 – 10:50 CONSENT AGENDA – N/A this month. Next Meeting: Tuesday, November 1, 2016

2 Project list:

Title VI program participation and Public Participation Plan implementation Participation in working groups for the Vermont Highway Safety Alliance Participation in the State’s Rail Council Coordination with United Way on the Neighbor Rides Program Adaptive Signal Control – Exit 14 Systems Engineering Analysis (Burlington/South Burlington) Advanced Traffic Monitoring System through FHWA AID grant – Pilot Corridor design Systemic Local Roads Safety (SLRS) Program – VTrans submitted final improvements plan Allen Martin/VT 15 Intersection Scoping Study (Essex) Expanded National Highway System (NHS) & Functional Class Review and Update LPM services for Underhill sidewalk construction on VT 15 LPM services for Shelburne sidewalk construction on US 7 LPM services for South Burlington sidewalk construction on VT 116 Burlington Walk Bike Plan technical committee Charlotte Park and Ride Study South Burlington Sidewalk/Path Gaps Scoping Regional Active Transportation Plan Burlington Winooski Avenue Circulation Study Bay Road Shelburne Bike Ped Corridor improvements study Bay Road Underpass pilot study Burlington/Winooski Main Street Bridge scoping Colchester Ave/Riverside Ave/Barrett St Intersection Scoping (Burlington) US 7 Southern Gateway Scoping (Shelburne) Winooski Transportation Master Plan (Draft Plan Completed) North Ave Pilot Study (Burlington) Railyard Enterprise Scoping/PEL Project & Supplemental Scoping of Alternative 1B (Burlington) Transportation Hazard Mitigation Planning Winooski River Bicycle/Pedestrian Bridge Essex Path/Sidewalk Impact Policies So. Burlington Williston Road Area Transportation and Land Use Network Analysis So. Burlington VT116-Kimball-Tilley Land Use and Transportation Plan Williston Exit 12 Transportation Improvement District (TID) Pilot Project Mountain View Road Scoping Study, Williston Alternative Transportation Crossing Study for of I-89 Exit 14, South Burlington Regional Transportation Energy Planning Shelburne Phase 2 of Form Based Zoning to Improve Walkability Overhaul of South Burlington’s Traffic Overlay District Jericho Riverside Future Street Network Study Winooski Downtown Parking Management Study Update to South Burlington’s Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance ADA Evaluation of Pedestrian Facilities in Essex/Essex Junction Malletts Bay Stormwater Management Plan (Colchester)

1 CHITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION 2

TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE - MINUTES 3 4 DATE: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 5 TIME: 9:00 a.m. 6 PLACE: CCRPC Offices, 110 West Canal St. Winooski, VT 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Bryan Davis noted that he is filling in for Peter Keating and the TAC Chair Bryan Osborne would not be 29 able to make it to today’s meeting. 30 31 1. Consent Agenda 32 A memo in the meeting packet contained a minor TIP amendment. JUSTIN RABIDOUX MADE A 33 MOTION, SECONDED BY DENNIS LUTZ TO APPROVE THE TIP AMENDMENTS. THE 34 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 35 36 2. Approval of Minutes 37 BOB HENNEBERGER MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF July 5, 2016. THE 38 MOTION WAS SECONDED BY BARBARA ELLIOT AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 39 40 3. Public Comments 41 There were none. 42 43 4. Road Erosion Inventory: Update and Consultant Selection (Action Item) 44 Bryan Davis introduced this item to the TAC and informed them about the selection committee’s 45 recommendation of Fitzgerald Environmental Associates (with Milone & MacBroom). Justin Rabidoux 46 asked about future projects and if Fitzgerald is on board for these as well. Dan Albrecht and Charlie 47 Baker responded no, as of right now they would just be working on this phase of developing a 48 prioritization methodology. Dan informed everyone that there is a separate RFP out for the Jericho 49 Stormwater Master Plan. Dean Bloch asked that electronic files be included as deliverables. Katelin 50 Brewer-Colie suggested Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) be part of the toolbox of stormwater 51 improvements. Dean inquired about how the CCRPC’s data collection went over the summer. Dan and 52 Chris Dubin responded that the interns were able to complete the inventories on time but noted it was a 53

Members Present Dean Bloch, Charlotte Brian Bigelow, Underhill Justin Rabidoux, South Burlington Bob Henneberger, Seniors Matt Langham, VTrans Amy Bell, VTrans Dick Hosking, VTrans D5 Ashley Bishop, VTrans D5 Dennis Lutz, Essex Katherine Sonnick, Jericho Nicole Losch, Burlington Robin Pierce, Essex Junction Barbara Elliot, Huntington Katelin Brewer-Colie, Bike/Ped Sandy Thibault, CATMA Mary Anne Michaels, Rail Trevor Lashua, Hinesburg

Staff Present Eleni Churchill, Transportation Program Manager Regina Mahony, Planning Program Manager Christine Forde, Senior Transportation Planner Charlie Baker, Executive Director Sai Sarepalli, Transportation Planning Engineer Bryan Davis, Senior Transportation Planner Jason Charest, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Marshall Distel, Transportation Planner Dan Albrecht, Senior Planner Chris Dubin, Transportation Planner Others Present There were none.

Transportation Advisory Committee September 6, 2016

2

reasonably dry summer and we likely benefited because of it. Dick Hosking asked if this prioritization 1 model would be available to other RPCs if it proves successful. Yes it would be available for them to 2 use. Dennis Lutz asked about paved vs gravel roads and their respective phosphorus runoff. He is 3 concerned with making sure we are making improvements to stormwater where we will achieve the most 4 benefit relative to costs. Some municipalities had both paved and gravel data collected whereas others 5 were only gravel. Dan noted the towns where paved inventory was not gathered are part of the MS4 6 umbrella and paved roads would be addressed there. An interactive walk through of the online map 7 viewer tool was given. Dean asked what would be the best process for next year, meet with road 8 commissioner first? Chris responded in the affirmative that meeting with the appropriate town officials 9 ahead of conducting the inventory would be best. BRUCE HOAR MADE A RECOMMENDATION TO 10 APPROVE THE COMMITTEE’S CONSULTANT SELECTION AND WAS SECONDED BY DENNIS 11 LUTZ. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 12 13 5. Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Update (Information Item) 14 15 Charlie Baker explained that it is time to update our MTP which needs to be approved in 2018. A big 16 piece of this is our Regional Transportation Model Update that is currently underway. Related to this 17 process is an update to our demographic forecasting. The population growth growing forward to 2040 18 looks to be a bit flatter than in previous MTP updates. Charlie proposed that we spend more time on this 19 as a group and that the TAC serves as the MTP advisory committee to approve the population forecasts. 20 This would begin in October and finish in the April/May 2017 timeframe. Dean asked if the population 21 forecasts would be broken down into age cohorts and Charlie responded yes it will be. There will also be 22 one TAC member needed to serve on the Long Range Planning Committee (LRPC). Justin volunteered 23 to serve on the LRPC. Dennis asked about the CIRC projects with respect to the MTP project list. Jason 24 Charest gave an introduction to the rMove travel data collection app and explained how this is the tool 25 that will be used to conduct a household travel survey as part of the model update. Providing there are 26 enough respondents it will give us a statistically representative sample of various travel behavior 27 throughout the county. The TAC members are encouraged to participate in this and Jason will forward a 28 link when it is available. The survey will utilize your cell phone GPS to track and record respondents 29 travel behavior over a 2-3 day period. 30 31 6. I-89 Exit 14 Systems Engineering Analysis (SEA) Follow Up (Information Item) 32 Sai Sarepalli recapped the request made at the July TAC meeting to authorize staff to proceed with 33 entering into a contract with the most qualified consultant based on the selection committee’s 34 recommendation. Sai informed the TAC that the selection committee chose Stantec for this project. He 35 followed up with the project’s next steps. 36 37 7. Status of Projects and Subcommittee Reports 38 Bryan directed TAC members to the project list on the back of the agenda page and asked if members had 39 any questions. 40 41 8. CCRPC May and July Board Meetings Report. 42 Charlie reviewed the highlights of the July Board Meeting. There were three minor TIP amendments, a 43 UVM Medical Center Needs Assessment presentation, FY17 TIP approval, chair appointed committees, 44 board development committee update to our bylaws regarding regional shared services, and the hazard 45 mitigation plan is underway. 46 47 9. Chairman’s/Members’ Items 48 Bryan Davis had two updates: 49

Transportation Advisory Committee September 6, 2016

3

a.) Vermont DEC announced the proposed 2017 Vermont Stormwater Management Manual Rule 1 was filed with Interagency Committee on Administrative Rules (ICAR) on Tuesday, August 30, 2 2016, to initiate adoption of the Manual through rulemaking. A public meeting has been 3 scheduled for Tuesday, October 25th, 2016 from 9:00 am until 12:00 pm at the Pavilion Building 4 Auditorium, located at 109 State Street in Montpelier. A copy of the proposed rule and 5 associated filings is available on the VT DEC Stormwater Program website at the following link: 6 http://dec.vermont.gov/watershed/stormwater/manual_update 7

b.) VT DEC announced four workshops in September to review the RFP for Ecosystem Restoration 8 Grants. The nearest one to us is on September 20, 2016 at the DEC Fish and Wildlife Office, 111 9 West St, Essex Junction from 1-4pm. The RFP can be found at the following website: 10 http://dec.vermont.gov/watershed/cwi/grants 11

12 13 DENNIS LUTZ MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AND THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY 14 JUSTIN RABIDOUX. 15 16 The meeting adjourned at 9:49 a.m. 17 18 Respectfully submitted, 19 20 Jason Charest 21

CCRPC Transportation Advisory Committee 10/04/2016 Agenda Item 4: Action Item

Malletts Bay Stormwater Management System & Transportation Scoping ‐ Consultant Selection Process

Background:

Review Committee: Staff Recommendation:

For more information Contact:

The CCRPC, in coordination with the Town of Colchester, released an RFP on 8/26 to solicit proposals from qualified firms to develop a comprehensive stormwater management system for Malletts Bay and its upland watersheds, along with conducting scoping studies for pedestrian/bike improvements on West Lakeshore Drive between Prim Road and Blakely Road and capacity improvements at the signalized intersection of East/West Lakeshore Drive and Blakely Road. This project consists of three separate but related scopes of work to effectively address each of these individual tasks. It is anticipated that the work will be conducted concurrently. The main goals associated with these initiatives are to improve stormwater management in order to preserve and protect Malletts Bay, enhance traffic safety and capacity at the East/West Lakeshore Drive and Blakely Road intersection and increase active transportation opportunities along the West Lakeshore Drive corridor. The deadline for proposals was 9/23. CCRPC staff received proposals from Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, WSP Parsons Brinkerhoff, VHB and RSG. Due to the individual schedules of the review committee members, the committee will not be able to meet until the end of the first week of October to review and score these proposals. In order to avoid delaying the start of this project, CCRPC staff requests that the TAC authorizes the Review Committee to select and the CCRPC to enter into a contract with the most qualified consultant based on scores and committee discussions so that work can start near the end of October.

Bryan Osborne, Colchester

Marshall Distel, CCRPC

Eleni Churchill, CCRPC

Dan Albrecht, CCRPC CCRPC staff requests that the TAC authorizes the CCRPC to enter into a contract with the most qualified consultant for the Malletts Bay Stormwater Management System & Transportation Scoping Study based on the Review Committee’s recommendation.

Marshall Distel, (802) 861‐0122 ext. 26, [email protected]

CCRPC Transportation Advisory Committee 10/04/2016 Agenda Item 6: Action Item

Town of Shelburne Form Based Code, Phase 2 ‐ Consultant Selection Process

Background:

Review Committee: Staff Recommendation:

For more information Contact:

The CCRPC, in coordination with the Town of Shelburne, issued an RFP in a simplified bid process on 8/15/2016, seeking proposals from three qualified firms to refine the existing Form Based Zoning Overlay District along RT 7, from the LaPlatte River to the South Burlington city line. The main goals are to: strengthen the form‐based guidelines and requirements; revisit stormwater management requirements; clarify how to handle infill development on existing developed sites; incorporate building materials requirements; developing themes for sign design and public art; and to raise awareness of the advantages of a more dense, walkable, connected, transit‐oriented development pattern. The original deadline for proposals was 9/12/2016; this was extended to 9/19/2016 for all three consultants. CCRPC staff received proposals from two teams: one led by Brandy Saxton of PlaceSense, and the other led by Ted Brovitz of Brovitz Community Planning and Design. The review committee is meeting on Thursday, 9/29/2016 to review the two proposals received. In order to avoid delaying the start of this project until after the November TAC meeting, CCRPC staff respectfully request that the TAC authorize the Review Committee to select, and the CCRPC to enter into a contract with, the more qualified consultant based on scores and committee discussions so that work may begin as soon as possible in October. Thank you.

Dean Pierce, Shelburne Town Planner

Jamie Heins, Shelburne Planning Commission Chair

Kate Lalley, Shelburne Planning Commission member

Lee Krohn, CCRPC CCRPC staff requests that the TAC authorize the CCRPC to enter into a contract with the most qualified consultant for the Shelburne Form Based Code Phase 2 project, based on the Review Committee’s recommendation.

Lee Krohn, AICP, (802) 861‐0118 direct line, [email protected]

Chittenden County Circumferential Highway (CCCH) Right of Way & Mitigation Site Management Plan

September 2, 2016

CCCH ROW & Mitigation Site Management Plan September 2, 2016

Vermont Agency of Transportation I

Contents 1.0 Introduction & Background..................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Project History .................................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 Goals ....................................................................................................................................................... 3

2.1 Meet federal and state investment requirements ............................................................................. 3

2.2 Preserve and maintain parcels with existing or potential transportation function ........................... 3

2.3 Support goals of other state and municipal programs ....................................................................... 3

2.4 Create revenue streams where appropriate and viable ..................................................................... 3

2.5 Sell surplus property ........................................................................................................................... 3

3.0 Potential Actions ..................................................................................................................................... 4

3.1 Alternative Use Working Group .......................................................................................................... 4

3.2 Allowable Uses .................................................................................................................................... 5

4.0 Corridor Segment Inventory ................................................................................................................... 5

5.0 Mitigation Site Inventory ........................................................................................................................ 8

5.1 Tarbox Road / VT117, Jericho ............................................................................................................. 8

5.2 North Williston Road, Williston .......................................................................................................... 8

5.3 Towers Road, Essex ............................................................................................................................. 8

5.4 Pettengil Road, Essex .......................................................................................................................... 8

5.5 VT289 / VT2A intersection, Essex ....................................................................................................... 8

6.0 Summary & Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 9

Appendix ..................................................................................................................................................... 10

A. August 10, 1993 CCCH ROW Record

Figure 1 - Circ-Williston EIS Overview of Proposed Project .......................................................................... 6

Figure 2 – Segment Descriptions .................................................................................................................. 7


Vermont Agency of Transportation 1

1.0 Introduction & Background

1.1 Purpose This plan is intended to document the State of Vermont Agency of Transportation’s (VTrans) intent for

investments made in right of way acquisitions for the Chittenden County Circumferential Highway

project, ensure the Agency is meeting all obligations associated with the land and easement

acquisitions, and establish a process by which municipalities and other organizations may request use of

the lands for appropriate purposes.

1.2 Project History The history of the Chittenden County Circumferential Highway (CCCH) project formally begins in the

sixties, when in 1967, the State Highway Board and the Governor approved a proposed twenty-one-mile

limited access highway which included the Burlington Beltline as well as a section from Route 127 in

Colchester to Williston. The project was placed on the ten-year highway construction plan adopted by

the Legislature in 1968.

In 1975, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC) adopted a regional plan with

completion of the circumferential highway as a major objective in the plan’s transportation element.

The project was called the Chittenden County Circumferential Highway project (CCCH), and consisted of

a sixteen-mile limited access facility located in the Chittenden County towns of Williston, Essex, and

Colchester.

A 1978 VTrans traffic study of the Essex-Williston area projected inadequate levels of service at

numerous intersections beginning as soon as 1983. The study recommended a circumferential highway

designed to sixty mph standards with full access control.

In 1980, State funding was not available to advance the CCCH. As a result, funding for the project was

sought by local and state officials through a Demonstration Grant from FHWA. This grant was secured

through the 1982 Surface Transportation Act. This Demonstration Grant project was to determine the

potential of saving time and costs by extending State certification coverage to a project of this size and

diversity in areas that require improved access between rapidly growing suburban areas and established

urban core areas.

In 1982, the municipalities of Colchester, Essex, Essex Junction and Williston formed a Union Municipal

District called the Chittenden County Circumferential Highway District (CCCHD) and, in conjunction with

the Vermont Agency of Transportation, undertook the task of planning, designing and constructing the

project.

The estimated construction cost for the recommended four-lane facility was in excess of $71 million in

1983 dollars, which exceeded the available funds allocated by Congress. Therefore, in November 1983,

it was determined that a two-lane facility, with climbing lanes as necessary, on a four-lane right of way

would be the design concept to be advanced.



In the fall of 1983, VTrans initiated the process for advancing the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

for the proposed CCCH and to design the portion of it from Route 15 in Essex to I-89 in Williston. In late

June of 1984, a report entitled Evaluation and Recommendation of Alignments to be Carried into the

Draft Environmental Impact Statement was published and distributed to all interested parties, including

state and federal agencies. The Draft EIS was released in August 1985.

In 1986, a bill was passed by the Vermont State Legislature, entitled “An Act for the Construction of the

Chittenden County Circumferential Highway as Part of the State Highway System”. Included in this

legislation were changes that designated the CCCH as a state highway, the formalization of the CCCHD

Steering Committee process and the recognition of the opportunity for the CCCH to be included by a

later session of the legislature for funding under the Five-Year Highway Transportation Program.

Another piece of legislation added the two interchanges of the CCCH with I-89 into the interstate

system, and provided for the funding of these interchanges from interstate construction monies.

In August 1986, VTrans completed the Final EIS, and a Record of Decision (ROD) was later approved for

the project. The 1986 Final EIS divided the CCCH into Segments A-F for planning purposes, with

Segment A beginning at VT127 in Colchester and Segment F ending at I-89 in Williston. Subsequent

design plans, however, changed the segment designations used in the 1986 Final EIS to an A-J lettering

scheme, with Segment A beginning at I-89 in Williston and Segment J ending at VT127 in Colchester.

As a result of the Record of Decision, the available Demonstration Grant funding, along with additional

state and federal funding, was used to perform the design and permitting for the entire 16 miles,

acquire all right of way for 12 miles (Segments A-H), acquire partial right of way for 4 miles (Segments I

& J) and construct four miles of new highway in Essex, between VT117 east of Essex Junction and VT2A

and Susie Wilson Road north of Essex Junction. This roadway (VT289 Segments C-F) opened to traffic in

October of 1993 as a two-lane roadway, with the intention of expanding to four lanes in the future,

when deemed necessary.

Subsequent legal and environmental permitting issues prevented the construction of the remaining

planned segments of the roadway1, and in 2011, VTrans in partnership with the CCRPC, the

municipalities, and other regional entities began a multi-year implementation of projects intended to

ease congestion and traffic demand in the CCCH project area. This program, known as “Circ

Alternatives” created additional public transit services, support for transportation demand management

(TDM) programs, intelligent transportation system (ITS) improvements to existing traffic signals to

improve the level of service, and numerous intersection improvement projects on routes VT117, VT15,

VT2A, and VT127 as well as significant I-89 interchange improvements.

1 A more thorough history of the project and process is available in Chapter 1 of the 2010 Circ-Williston Final Environmental Impact Statement.



2.0 Goals The specific goals of this plan are:

2.1 Meet federal and state investment requirements Federal and state funds were utilized in the purchase of numerous properties necessary for the

construction of the highway. Those properties that were purchased with federal transportation funding

must show they are being used for, or are intended for use for, a transportation purpose. For those

sections that were constructed, this requirement has been met. For those purchased but on which no

functioning transportation facility was built, the state must establish its intent with regard to meeting

this requirement. All proposed uses must comply with 23 C.F.R. § 710 Subpart D - Real Property

Management. Any non-highway use, as defined by FHWA, may require a public interest determination

by FHWA as specified in 23 C.F.R. § 1.23.

2.2 Preserve and maintain parcels with existing or potential transportation function Many properties were utilized in the construction for sections C-F and are currently serving a

transportation purpose. Others could feasibly serve a transportation purpose in the future. For those

parcels upon which highway was constructed, VTrans is responsible for operations and maintenance.

Parcels that could still serve a transportation function in the future should be preserved and maintained

as necessary.

2.3 Support goals of other state and municipal programs It may be possible through leases, easements or other contractual arrangements to support other state

programs or municipal projects. Examples might include state energy programs or projects such as solar

installations, shared-use path and trails projects, or establishment of mitigation sites for other state

transportation projects.

2.4 Create revenue streams where appropriate and viable The most tangible example of this is the gas utility easement provided along Segments A-G. This results

in a lease payment to the State of Vermont. Other potential utility easement opportunities may exist

and could represent an appropriate, viable means of revenue generation.

2.5 Sell surplus property Some parcels acquired as part of the CCCH project may be considered for sale. Parcels that would most

likely be considered for sale are those “remainder” parcels that fall outside of the limited access

highway limits throughout the corridor. Mitigation site parcels may be considered for alternative uses,

though the state will retain ownership. Section 3.0 outlines the steps VTrans will take prior to

considering a parcel for sale. Parcel status and details can be confirmed by contacting the VTrans Chief

of Right of Way.



3.0 Potential Actions The following range of possibilities will be considered in this order when contemplating action on any

parcels in state-ownership:

1. Maintain and preserve 2. Maintain ownership and work with municipalities or other appropriate organizations to develop

transportation uses for the property 3. Maintain ownership and work with municipalities or other appropriate organizations to develop

non-transportation uses for the property 4. Sell the property

Any disposal of surplus real property shall follow Chapter 8, Property Management, of the VAOT (VTrans) Right of Way Manual. Chapter 8 outlines the rules, policies, and procedures to be followed by the VAOT in compliance with Federal and State laws and 23 C.F.R. § 710 Subpart D, for the overall management of real property acquired in connection with Federal-aid transportation projects. Any non-highway use, as defined by FHWA, may require a public interest determination by FHWA as specified in 23 C.F.R 1.23. The VTrans Right of Way section serves as the primary point of contact for issues related to the parcels of land referenced in this plan. Questions, proposals for use, and general communications about the content of this plan should be directed first to that office.

3.1 Alternative Use Working Group VTrans will review proposed uses of the corridor. Proposals for alternative uses of the corridor should be formally submitted in writing to the VTrans Chief of Right of Way for consideration. Proposals must be accompanied by a letter of support from the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC) confirming the proposed use is consistent with the Regional Plan, including the Metropolitan Transportation Plan component. Proposals will be reviewed by the Director of the Policy, Planning and Intermodal Development Division, VTrans Chief of Right of Way, the VTrans Planning Coordinator assigned to CCRPC as their liaison, and other VTrans staff as appropriate. CCRPC staff may be consulted as necessary. Applicants must understand that the State, subject to Federal Highway Administration requirements, holds ultimate authority over the corridor. Development of a state highway facility remains the originally intended purpose for the corridor. The original state highway use of the corridor may take precedence over any approved interim use.



3.2 Allowable Uses2 The following are examples of potentially allowable uses for the properties referred to in this plan:

Municipal or state highway

Shared-use path

Non-motorized trail

VAST trail

Utility easements

Grazing pasture

Crop leases

Alternative energy generation

Property access

Silviculture / forest management

4.0 Corridor Segment Inventory The eastern-most segments are those furthest along in the development process. Segments A & B

together form the “Circ-Williston” project. These sections extend from I-89 in Williston to the north

where Segment B crosses the Winooski River, joining the VT117/River Road just on the other side of the

river where existing VT289 / Segment C begins.

Segments C, D, E, and F are constructed and serving a highway transportation function. These segments

collectively form VT289, between VT117 / River Road and VT2A in Essex.

Segments G-J comprise the remainder of the planned corridor, extending from VT2A in Essex to VT127 in

Colchester.

See Figure 1 - Circ-Williston EIS Overview of Proposed Project, and Figure 2 – Segment Descriptions for

more detailed information on each segment.

2 This list is not exhaustive, nor should it be interpreted as automatic approval of a listed allowable use. Proposals for use must be submitted to VTrans through the process outlined in this plan and will be considered on an individual basis.



Figure 1 - Circ-Williston EIS Overview of Proposed Project



Figure 2 – Segment Descriptions

Segment A Segment B Segment C Segment D Segment E Segment F Segment G Segment H Segment I/J Mitigation Sites

Town(s) Williston Williston Essex Essex Essex Essex Essex – Colchester Colchester Colchester Essex, Williston, Jericho

Terminus Points I-89 to approximate midpoint between I-89 and VT117 (Start:761+00; End: 847+00)

Approximate midpoint between I-89 and VT117, to VT117 intersection with VT289 (Start: 673+00; End 761+00)

VT114 to one-third of the way to VT15 (Start 609+00; End 674+00)

One-third of the way between VT114 and VT15 to two-thirds of the way (Start 562+00; End 609+00)

Two-thirds of the way between VT114 and VT15 to VT15 (Start 536+00; End 562+00)

VT15 to VT2A (Start 433+00; End 536+00)

VT2A to US7 (Start 293+00; End 433+00)

US7 to I-89 (Start 236+00; End 293+00)

I-89 to VT127 (Start 28+00; End 236+00)

Three (3) sites in Essex, one (1) Williston, one (1) Jericho (see Section 5.0 of this plan for details)

Length (feet) 8,600 8,800

6,400 4,700 2,600 10,300 14,000 5,700 20,800 N/A

number of parcels (purchased / proposed)3

12 / 8 7 / 7 15 / 15 5 / 5 9 / 10 18 / 18 19 / 17 10 / 9 10 / 52 5

Project Development Phase

Conceptual Design Conceptual Design Constructed Constructed Constructed Constructed Preliminary Design (outdated)

Preliminary Design (outdated)

Preliminary Design (outdated)

Purchased / Constructed

Permit Status 2010 NEPA Record of Decision (ROD) issued by FHWA

2010 NEPA Record of Decision (ROD) issued by FHWA

Storm-water must be maintained




NEPA 1987 EIS ROD challenged as part of A/B lawsuit



Environmental Considerations

Archaeological, wetland resources, impaired waterway (Allen Brook)

Forested wetlands; habitat connectivity





forested wetlands; habitat connectivity; threatened & endangered species



Existing Leases, easements, agreements

Municipal path crossing; gas pipeline

Gas pipeline Gas pipeline Gas pipeline Gas pipeline Gas pipeline Gas pipeline

Maintenance Requirements

N/A N/A Roadway maintenance

Roadway maintenance

Roadway maintenance

Roadway maintenance

N/A N/A N/A

Right of Way All necessary property acquired based on original design

All necessary property acquired based on original design







Some property acquired based on original design

N/A

Other Notes 2003 construction project to relocate US2 utilities and install ROW fence from I-89 to north of the school

See additional text in this plan for locations and details for each site

3 Number of parcels proposed based on 8/10/93 plans. Table attached as Appendix A



5.0 Mitigation Site Inventory A number of properties were purchased as mitigation sites to offset impacts of the CCCH as it was planned and partially constructed. Some of these parcels were purchased in anticipation of impacts and others are active mitigation sites, accounting for impacts that were realized through constructed portions of the highway. Mitigation sites will be retained by the state for existing and future mitigation purposes. However, as exemplified below, alternative uses are compatible in many instances and can be proposed for consideration through the process outlined in this document. The following provides basic information about the location, size, and mitigation status of these

properties.

5.1 Tarbox Road / VT117, Jericho This piece of property located between Tarbox Road and VT117 in Jericho, was purchased from the Faye

Estate for future mitigation use. It consists of 237 acres. There are no current activities taking place on

the parcel, and it does not require special maintenance actions.

5.2 North Williston Road, Williston This parcel of property was purchased from Conant for future mitigation use. It consists of 40 acres,

including wetland. Conant uses it for pasture as well as plant crops through a lease with the state. It

doesn’t require any special maintenance actions, but the status and conditions of the pasturing and

farming activities should be monitored.

5.3 Towers Road, Essex This parcel was purchased from Basillierre for future mitigation use. It consists of 24.8 acres. There is

an active crop lease for this site. No special maintenance actions are necessary, but the status and

conditions of the farming activities should be monitored.

5.4 Pettengil Road, Essex This is a permitted wetland mitigation site. It consists of 123 acres with the Browns River on its eastern

border. There is an active crop lease for this site. Of the 123 acres, 86 are committed to the existing

projects. The remainder of the acreage is available for future mitigation or other uses.

5.5 VT289 / VT2A intersection, Essex The only “on site” mitigation site, this 37.7 acre parcel is located in the southeast quadrant of the

intersection of VT 289 and VT2A. It is an active, permitted mitigation site and must be conserved in its

current state.



6.0 Summary & Recommendations This plan is intended to document VTrans’ efforts and intentions with regard to the planned right of way and associated property acquisitions for the Chittenden County Circumferential Highway. A range of actions is possible for each parcel purchased in anticipation for the construction of the highway. Land acquired for use in the area of the portions of the highway that were constructed (C-F) will continue to be maintained as highway, with secondary uses possible as appropriate, such as the existing easement for the natural gas pipeline. Other parcels of land may be used by municipalities or other organizations for transportation uses and/or non-transportation uses. VTrans will meet with the affected municipalities to consider proposed uses for any of the properties acquired for the highway. Preference will be given to transportation uses, though other uses may be approved. The VTrans Right of Way section will serve as the primary point of contact for issues related to the land discussed in this plan. Proposals for alternative uses are to be submitted in writing to the VTrans Chief of Right of Way for consideration by an internal VTrans working group. All actions will be governed by the Vermont Agency of Transportation Right of Way Manual and the state and federal rules referenced therein.



Appendix A. August 10, 1993 CCCH ROW Record

tuesday, october 4, 2016 9:00 a.m. ccrpc office, 110 west ... · transportation advisory committee...

Documents