Blatant Plagiarism By Joe Henson, Raymond Lal, Matthew F.PuseyTo whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.

To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)

I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in 1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets. This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I did that long ago inthis paper.