trust as a basis for effectiveness of remote/virtual teams: leading to the success of the global...
TRANSCRIPT
Dr Inna Stelmukh, 11th March 2015
Preferences Thank you for your interest and attention.
Questions will be answered after the presentation.
Common Challenges Global roll out process for IT systems and in general for the
global projects can be:
lengthy process
pains of change
prone to mistakes
significant risks
considerable costs
no benefits delivered
negative impact on efficiency and/or growth
Industry Statistics*Large IT efforts often cost much more than planned; some can put the whole organization in jeopardy. The companies that defy these odds are the ones that master key dimensions that align IT and business value.
Mc Kinsey Study *
Industry Statistics*Large IT efforts often cost much more than planned; some can put the whole organization in jeopardy. The companies that defy these odds are the ones that master key dimensions that align IT and business value.
Mc Kinsey Study *
Origin of Well Known Challenges*
Choices for international projects** Be there
Cluster activities in one location
Establish “neural” network of local presence under global direction Outline & Build
Connect and Conduct
Use
Benefit
Reapply best practices and spread further
** - this is applicable for any other complex multidimensional project (e.g. cross business/ cross functional)
Facing the Reality of International enterprise Remote and virtual resources for an international enterprise:
Always been there;
Not always been seen/recognised as a team;
Not always been managed as a team.
Was it an effective usage of the local presence?
Fear to rely on remote teams => No trust.
So, how trust can be brought in?
When do we trust? We trust ourselves and our senses
We see
We hear
Let’s leave other three senses for lunches and dinners
Then, we believe that we can control => manage => make it efficient
When do we trust? We trust ourselves
We see
We hear
Let’s leave other three senses for lunches and dinners
Then, we believe that we can control => manage => make it efficient
This is the “local” circle of trust i.e.
where a team
member is.
Do we still trust if we are not there? Ironically, YES!
Trust is a powerful enabler/tool left to managers of virtual and remote teams.
“The best way to find out if you can trust somebody is to trust them.” ― Ernest Hemingway
Do we still trust if we are not there? Ironically, YES!
Trust is the only enabler and tool left to managers of the virtual and remote teams.
“The best way to find out if you can trust somebody is to trust them.” ― Ernest Hemingway
This is a “leader’s choice"
when we engage a remote team.
Stakeholder (Resource) engagement –Mirror Funnel in IT projects
Stakeholder Management Radius is narrowing down:
Initialisation
Requirements
Scope
Stakeholder Management Radius is widening up:
Build and Delivery
Testing
Roll Out
Narrow Down – Get it Defined and Done
Stakeholder Management – key verbs:
Initialisation: listen
Requirements: collect
Scope: select
Outlining the future “neural” network
Trust your senses
Trust your knowledge
Trust others
Local 1 Local 2 Local N
Leader
Widen Up – Get it Tested and Used
Stakeholder Management – key “verbs”:
Build and Delivery – set expectations
Testing - convince
Roll Out – prove
Use the established “neural” network
Test robustness
Align
Spread: Give freedom to act
Leader
Local 1 Local 2 Local N
Build the Team Observe, Identify & Engage
local subject matter experts, leaders and IT talents
Build a strong remote and/or virtual delivery team
Involve them from the start of the project
Analyse roll out options and kick off preparations
Consult with them throughout project delivery
Let them test
Leave the roll out process to them
G-Localisation: 2D model
G (global/ centralised/ standard) dimension
Local representatives form the core global roll out team
Collective learning and identifying fundamental common rules
Stretch the gained knowledge into the new way of working
Creativity area for the process optimisation opportunities
Benefits sketch
L (local) dimension:
Specific country requirements
“translate” G-messages to L-environment
Change management agents
G-L-T Recipe for Success mixed on Trust G (global)
Project vision, strategy, approach, plan, leadership
L (local)
Representation, buy in, organisation, usage
T (trust)
Relationships, leadership foundation
Between team members
Between the team and the rest of the organisation
Origin of Well Known Challenges*
TRUST!
How does Trust drives for effectiveness of remote teams? Unclear objectives
Lack of business focus
Shifting requirements
Unaligned team
Reactive Planning
Some of unexplained causes
Establishing of a remote team represented by user community
ensures that those common drawbacks are addressed at the
start of the project
How does Trust drives for effectiveness of remote teams? Unclear objectives
Lack of business focus
Shifting requirements
Unaligned team
Reactive Planning
Some of unexplained causes
Establishing of a remote team represented by user community
ensures that those common drawbacks are addressed at the
start of the projecet
Alignment and adequate planning is ensured when
remote representatives are made working as a team
Main beneficiary Global initiatives such as IT projects
Ensures that delivery is on budget
Shrunken time frame for the actual roll out
From few months/years down to weeks and even 24 hours
Allow time to prepare – but it is planned time
Cost avoidance such as travel related & accommodation
Thousands – millions of relevant currency
Risk mitigation:
Continuous validation/ reality check through local representation
Trust can be a key contributor to the overall success
Thank You My team for giving me an opportunity to drive and deliver
complex enterprise solutions by trusting them .... And to learn what I told you today from it!
Deanna Kosaraju
Linked-In
Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology
... And all of you!
HAPPY INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S DAY!
Referencies * “Delivering large-scale IT projects on time, on budget, and on
value” - Michael Bloch, Sven Blumberg, Jürgen Laartz/ McKinsey & Co, Business Technology Office, October 2012