trip report hunterstown road site epa work assignment … · trip report hunterstown road site...

TRIP REPORT

HUNTERSTOWN ROAD SITEOCTOBER 6, 1986

EPA WORK ASSIGNMENT NO. 24-34E1.0

INTRODUCTION

A site reconnaissance was conducted at the Hunterstown RoadSite, Straban Township, Pennsylvania on October 6, 1986. Theparticipants included the following: *

James S. Whang (Site Manager, REM III)Kenning Tsaur (Chemical Engineer, REM III)

The Hunterstown Road Site consisted of one disposal area fordrum storage and burial and a lagoon where waste materials weredumped. Waste materials were discarded in these areas from 1970to 1979 or 1980. Among the materials disposed were industrialsolvents, paint sludges, and inert substances. Approximately600 drums were reportedly buried and/or emptied at the site.Additionally, an estimated 590 cubic yards of paint sludge weredumped. Laboratory analysis of samples from the lagoon arearevealed high levels of both organic and inorganic pollutants.Downstream surface - drainage samples from the buried drum areahave shown high levels of 1,1,1-trichloroethane and lead.Solvents have migrated off site and into the deeper confined orsemi-confined groundwater system.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this visit was to make visual observations ofthe site to familiarize the review team with the site layout andsurroundings prior to reviewing and/or evaluating thepotentially responsible party's (PRP's) RI/FS Work Plan.

FIELD OBSERVATIONS

James S. Whang (REM III) and Kerming Tsaur (REM III) arrived atthe Hunterstown Road Site in Straban Township, Pennsylvania onOctober 6, 1986 at approximately 09:30 A.M.

The following observations and findings were made during thevisit:

o The lagoon waste area to the east of Hunterstown R.oacan be reached from Hunterstown Road tbfrorgfg, \ anunpaved access road. A garbage pile was |jp&nfl on thenorth side of the access road (Figure 1). An unlocked

gate containing a warning sign is installed at thesite entrance. The lagoon is completely chain-linkfenced, which contains a locked gate at thenortheastern corner.

o An asbestos fiber disposal pile posted with warningsigns was observed along the southern bank of thecreek across from the lagoon. Aquatic vegetationthrives in the lagoon, which was partially filledduring the visit. Judging from the topography, thelagoon is well within the flood plain of the creek andpossibly feeds into the creek, when it overflowsduring heavy rainfall. v

o The drum area to the west of Hunterstown Road islocated at the rear of the Fred Shealer residence.Because the waste materials/drums were buried andgrass was well maintained over the entire area, thesite boundaries could not be identified.

o A pond containing 2-3 feet of standing water andconstruction debris along its edges was observed southof the drum area.

o Instrument readings for the ambient air in the normalbreathing zone or near the ground surface immediatelyabove the suspected waste areas were comparable andconsistent with background levels throughout thesite. Considering the atmospheric dilution effect,background hNu readings near the ground surfaceimmediately above the suspected waste areas do notnecessarily imply the absence of volatile organicsubstances in these areas.

o No unusual odors were detected throughout the siteduring the site reconnaissance.

o The REM III Team completed the site visit atapproximately 10:50 A.M.

100822

Waste Pile

Entrance GateFence/Gate

WEST BRANCH

SHEALER(FRED)OSta. 07

APPROX. LOCATIONBURIED DRUMS '

OSHRIVERWEAVER

PHI EL

•HOFFMANSHEALERtCATHERINE)

EAST BRANCH!

WADDELL OHEFLIN i

LEGEND;A Sta. xx » Air Monitoring Station No. xx

FIGURESITE LAYOUT AND AIR QUALITY\tf*ON£M)fcl&e STATHUNTERSTOWN ROAD SITE, STRABAN TOWNSHIP,

(NO SCALE)3

3-

TEST IT EXPLORATION OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY LOGHUNTERSTOWN PAD SITE. STRABAN TOWNSHIP. ADAMS COUNTY. PA.

Date: August 19, 1987

Time ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION

08:35 hrs AEPCO Personnel arrived at the site; REMCORpersonnel were preparing the drum burial area(North Area) for test pit exploration program.

'08:37 hrs AEPCO Personnel met Mr. Jeffrey Sample (REMCOR)and briefed him about AEPCOs role with EPA andEBASCO REM III and the relationship to thisparticular site. vJeff gave AEPCO a copy of the "Revised Site WorkPlan-Assessment of Drum Disposal Areas,Hunterstown Road Site, Gettysburg, PA. preparedfor Westinghouse Electric Corporation, by REMCOR,Inc., Pittsburgh, PA. dated June 30, 1987.Mr. Sample described the work activities for boththe North and South drum burial areas undercontract to the Westinghouse Electric Corp.,Pittsburgh, PA.

08:37 to 9:28 hrsSix REMCOR personnel were onsite, one backhoe withfront end loader, 2 pick-up trucks and a mini-vanSite preparation work continued and included:

o The use of magnetometric detector and visualreconnaissance in order to detect any undergroundmetallic objects (e.g. REMCOR found some drums onthe northern tributary of the creek). Threedrums were found corroded and a pail was locatednear the creek.

o Use of an OVA to detect the presence of volatileorganic substances. (Mr. Sample said that thereadings so far were background).

o Staking the perimeter of the suspected drum areademarcating the areas of exclusion zone,contamination reduction zone and the supportzone.

o Use of chain saws to cut trees for clearing theareas where test pits may be dug.

o AEPCO completed review of the REMCOR Revised SiteWork Plan and the section on Health and SafetyPlan.

9:28 to9:33 A.M. o REMCOR personnel took a brief intermission.

9:33 to9:38 A.M. o Backhoe was operated to remove felled trees.

9:38 to9:52 A.M. o Onsite activities stopped.

9:48 A.M. o AEPCO took background readings near the Shealerresidence. Readings recorded were as follows:LEL = 0.01%Oxygen - 21.4%HNu Meter = 0.1 ppm benzene equivalent

(10.2 eV probe)Radiometer » 0.01 mRem/hr

9:52 A.M. o Ambient air reading at the staked perimeter ofthe site. Readings were as follows:LEL = 0.01%oxygen = 21.4%HNu meter = 0.1 ppmRadiometer - 0.01 mRem/hr

9:52 to11:12 A.M.

o REMCOR geologist arrived at the site, inspected theproposed test pit location and exploration area.

o REMCOR calibrated 2 air pumps to be used to obtain airsamples upwind and downwind during the testexploration period. The samples will be analyzed forasbestos fiber content in the ambient air during thetest pit excavation period.

o REMCOR set up the contamination reduction zone (CRZ)including equipment drop liner pad, drums, etc.

12:11 to13:10 P.M.

o AEPCO personnel went to lunch and returned at 13:10P.M.

13:15 P.M.

o AEPCO met with Kenneth J. Bird, from Paul C. RizzoAssociates, Inc. presently the RI/FS contractor forWestinghouse Electric Corporation.

13:15 to13:45 P.M.

o No activity on site.

RB100825

13:45 to14:00 P.M.

o REMCOR and Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc. suited outLeivel C protection for onsite excavation. Initialplans were to excavate perimeter pits.

14:05 P.M.o Backhoe was moved into the CRZ.

14:12 hrso REMCOR started digging the first perimeter pit (Pit

#1)14:23 hrs

o Weather; Sunny; 10 mph from the SE; 80 F-3 F.Pit #1 approximately 3 to 4 feet deep and of thedimensions 6 x 10 feet. Dry fill materials associatedwith silt loam, light to dark gray in color wasunearthed. A crushed drum was also unearthed from thepit. Wall boards were found lying in the pit,presumably from the manufacture and assembly ofelevators.

14:27 to 14:49 hrso Backhoe was moved from Pit #1 to Pit #2.

unearthed a drum lid which was corroded.fication of the soil materials was well defined on theeastern end of pit. No stratification was noticed onthe western side of pit. Some more drums wereidentified but not brought up.

14:49 to 15:27 hrso Intermission and cool-off time for REMCOR personnel.

15:27 to 15:39 hrso Backhoe was moved further to Pit #3. Unearthed one

drum and bottle (500 ml glass) from the pit. Paintsludge was also found in the pit.

15:45 to 16:01 hrso Backhoe worked on Pit f4. Exacavated to a depth of 3

to 6 feet. Length and width of the pit were 15 feet x3 feet. Several drums were found in the pit.

16:02 to 16:48 hrso Excavated Pit |5 to a depth of 3-6 feet and dimensions

of 25 feet long by 3 feet wide. Excavated some sludgeand wet blackish gray material from the pitreadings of the sludge materials was 2 pinaVssurface of the material. "'

o

16:48 to 17:03 hrso Excavation on Pit #6 had commenced. Found

construction debris in the pit. Two car tires wereuncovered. Dimensions of the pit - 10 feet x 6 feet x3 feet.

17:58 hrs One tire and 3 drums were excavated from Pit #7.Drums were severely corroded and empty. Wall boardwas also found in the pit (potentially containingasbestos).

RR100827

TEST PIT EXPLORATION OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY LOGHUNTERSTOWN ROAD SITE. STRABAN TOWNSHIP. ADAMS COUNTY. PA.

Date: August 20, 1987

Time ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION

Weather: Calm, Partly cloudy skies. Temperature inthe low 70's

7:30 A.M. AEPCO representative (Murali Kalavapudi) arrived onsite. REMCOR personnel were in Level B suits andstuffing excavated materials and debris into a newdrum. Most of the materials were from Pit #1.

08:00 hrs REMCOR personnel took a short break before hooking upthe pressure demand air line and organizing for theexcavation of Pit #8.

08:20 hrs Backhoe/Loader started to work on Pit #8. Pitmaterials consisted of black oil-tar like materialsand a 55-gallon drum lid. Markings on the drum lidread as "Chrysler Corporation - Chemical Division,Trenton, NJ. Further excavation brought out more omaterials. HNu readings taken at the surface level ofthe materials were 2 ppm and 4 ppm when disturbed.Further excavation of the pit brought out black liquidmaterials to the top. Intermittent whiffs of organicodors were noticed near the support zone line. HNureadings measured were background.

09:05 hrs Mr. Phiel, who claimed to be the owner of the areawhere the backhoe was working came over to the site.He asked EPA (Bill Studawel, Region III) what we weredoing on site. He did not interrupt the activity butsaid that he needed to be informed about the findings.

09:20 hrs Wind direction: Southeast at 2 mph.Black oily materials was observed to be oozing fromthe pit. Backhoe could not excavate any further sincethe liquid material would seep down and was hard toscoop up. Strong odors of organic materials werenoticed. HNu readings were still background.

10:00 hrs REMCOR removed exposed materials and 5 corroded drumsfrom the creek and placed them along the tree line

j*D iflAQOMPst of Pit #8. Regrading of excavated pits commencediMUOdlt 10:15 A.M. All pits were regraded and prepared for

restabi1ization.

10:35 hrs REMCOR personnel removed materials and 5 corrodeddrums from the creek and placed them along the treeline, west of Pit #8. Regrading of the excavated areacommenced at 10:15 hrs. All pits were filled andgraded. REMCOR plans on restabilization of the areaas per the Work Plan.

11:00 hrs REMCOR/WESTINGHOUSE/EPA/RIZZO discuss the essentialsof digging more test pits further north of theexisting boundaries demarcated by REMCOR.

11:15 hrs Backhoe loaded with drums excavated from the pits andthose filled with waste and debris from the pitTs weretaken away from the site onto the eastern area.

11:20 hrs REMCOR workers demark new area. EPA suggested that atleast two pits have to be dug to determine thenorthern extent of the waste burial area.

11:30 hrs Backhoe starts excavation of Pit #9; North of Pit fl.Asbestos fiber board material were found between 1-2feet depths. Soils below remain stratified andundisturbed.

11:40 hrs Backhoe works further north of Pit #9, near the septictank. This pit designated as Pit #10 contained cleansoils and no waste materials. Depth of pit = 5 to 6feet.

12:00 hrs Materials in pits were examined by EPA and REMCORgeologist, both in Pit #9 and #10.

12:30 hrs Pits were filled and regraded. EPA discusses plansfor the following week at the site. REMCOR plans toexcavate South Area.

13:10 hrs REMCOR personnel were found working on the SouthArea. All shrubs and bushes were cleared and removedfor excavation-.

l 00829

iiti**fc

-it)

. 0

"

1*

\4-50jTP-M.

U3-l>Jk

-t-U. 5 . lo

ftBI

:.

.'. •

?• 1-% -i

2-4 £""»A'~ "—A-

t-1

*T *-I? M

7

7o'* .

9- 0-6 AM R£ ueo<. .c>ua vtvu t -Wc-t- o^ In oJc -. H-&S

: 2.0 A rw.

8.

itJ-OUA/ J >U tcvj uX .

co-Cct

/00833

''"''i: 'H'.il.Jilr am I!'1'!,, i, M, .,!!,, in, ,i,,i, ,n, |i!,, ii, |'L /ii'ii'1!,,"''!!,!,!,,!' j ..''..ll.iiiji;,!!,,!!!!! .'"'''i, I11;: !>''''i» ''I!.'", I;!;!,,!,!1!!',."!!,!!!!

'i''"'i,||. Hi: . IllHii llllliii'lliillhiMlll..!!!!.!!!!!.''!...''!!;!!!!!,!!!''!:.!;: |l,|;i:, i;,,; im,.,!,!,. lii,,,,!:,,;,,,,.;!!; .mini, ,,,,|ii!i,,;,',i!:., HI.!,,,, Hul,

;/>" iVi1'1" I'iilmiiLi:!!::. l''"H"i!, ,,'!::!iiiiiii,.iilMim.iii!, i;>i,ii|i!li;;, .il.'u.u,,!,, u in,,,'!,.•• l!1 Ill I ' :'Mii.i!,, J,,.i!>uiii,.'i! i!>i'i,r '.ii:i.i,,jll. .....:;:i'|!|i."1: !'iiiJ'i,,!!,i,iM HHJI,!!,.!,,'

. •,, ''i. ii'!l;"""""""

... ' ""'" " "/I'M1"' """' .

„,.„,'"""""";:::-i;::::'' •/" !:„;:•!.,,.."""""'""""'I"ll '/ •••nijlli,,, li ••".. V ' IMII ' .!',,'!',,........ :!n,,;::-"ji-- ••'•••.. :•'/.•; '-",

(li , , •!, I , !l'!!'l''

, ., •

Mi;;!1 'Il < |l|li III ll!1"1!! I' '''I.' I ' " ' I ' l1'''"\ '\\ |i'' ! I! 1||' * >l | " I " ' ,l ..ii.'1"'

'iii'-iMiiil1'1 ||||I|' "\ ''''ili'u •'• "I' ''"' ''' p '' '•, '|i|i||lllliiii|||l!!lilliiilllllll!!!!!!!!.!!ir;il""'"":"""' ' ''" •'' •"'' ''"'I'll' III,,, .I ..mi , !i i,i|||!|lll!l!lll|)illi!!!!!l!llllliliMl>l.||||| i l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l i l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

MIMIIII,ll! '"'I"!J ,",!'"' , 'illllll II

2--

R-535-8-5-29HYDROGEOLOGIC EVALUATION

FORHUNTERSTOWN ROAD SITE

PREPARED UNDER.

TDD NO. F3-8505-06EPA NO.

CONTRACT NO. 68-01-6699

FOR THE

HAZARDOUS SITE CONTROL DIVISIONU.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

JANUARY 3, 1986

NUS CORPORATIONSUPERFUND DIVISION

SUBMITTED BY REVIEWED BY APPROVED BY

_____DAVID SIDE RICHARD CROMER GARTH GLENWGEOLOGIST ASSISTANT MANAGER /MANAGER, FIT III

MARTIN HOWEHYDROGEOLOGIST ftRl 0 8 8 3 /

Site Name; Hunterstown Road SiteTDD No.: F3-8505-06

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-11.1 AUTHORIZATION 1-11.2 SCOPE OF WORK 1-11.3 SUMMARY 1-1

2.0 BACKGROUND 2-12.1 SITE LOCATION 2-12.2 SITE HISTORY 2-12.3 SAMPLING HISTORY 2-1

3.0 HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 3-13.1 GEOLOGY 3-13.2 GROUNDWATERS 3-23.3 SAMPLING RESULTS 3-5

*.0 CONCLUSION *-l».l SUMMARY »-l».2 FINAL CONCLUSION *-l

5.0 REFERENCES 5-1

AR100838

a


APPENDICES

A 1.0 CEC SAMPLE ANALYSIS A-l

B 1.0 FIT III JANUARY 1985 B-lSAMPLE ANALYSIS

C 1.0 FIT III JUNE 1985 C-lSAMPLE ANALYSIS

D 1.0 SECTION 1.3 D-l*•

E 1.0 HOME WELL SURVEYS E-l

F 1.0 COPY OF TDD F-I

&5UOG839

in

ORIGINAL

SECTION 1

••=»•

A R i

Site Name: Hunterstovn Road SiteTDD No.: F3-85Q5-06

1.0 INTRODUCTION

l.l Authorization

NUS Corporation performed this work under Environ nentai Protection AgencyContract No. 68-01-6699. This specific report was prepared in accordance withTechnical Directive Document No. F3-S505-06 for the Hunterstown Road Sitelocated in Adams County, Pennsylvania.

1.2 Scope of Work

NUS FIT III was tasked to conduct a hydrogeoiogic assessment of the HunterstownRoad Site based upon the available information. The purpose of this assessment isto make a determination as to whether contamination originating from the site willreach Gettysburg Municipal Water Supply Well No. 5, and, if it will, to make areasonable time estimate as to when contamination could occur. In addition, asampling of pri/ate water supply wells and Gettysburg Municipal Water Supply WellNo. 5 was conducted to establish whether groundwater currently being interceptedby these wells is contaminated.

1.3 Summary

Sampling results indicate that chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents have spread from 1

or both waste disposal areas of the Hunterstown Road Site toward GettysburgMunicipal Water Supply Well No. 5. At present, contamination has occurred in anarea extending from adjacent to the sites to the south-southwest. There are 2possibilities indicated by geologic/hydrogeoiogic review of the availableinformation. One possibility suggests that contamination is confined to its present .extent by the geologic/hydrogeoiogic conditions of the Gettysburg Formation. Theother possibility suggests that the site-specific conditions have allowedcontamination to advance and it is spreading toward Gettysburg Municipal WaterSupply Well No. 5.

1-1

ORIGINAL

SECTION 2

Site Name: Hunterstown Road Si:;TDD No.; F3-35Q5-Q6

2.0 BACKGROUND

2.1 Site Location

The Hunterstown Road Site is located about l/S mile north of the intersection of '-Hunterstown Road and Sheaier Road, approximately 1-1/2 miles northeast of •Gettysburg (see figure 1). Gettysburg Municipal Water Supply Well No. 5 is about1-1/4 miles southwest of the Hunterstown Road Site. It is located along a narrowaccess road off the south side of Route 30, approximately 1/3 mile west of thejunction of Hunterstown Road and Route 30 (see figure 1).

2.2 Site History

The Hunterstown 3.oad Site consisted of 2 waste disposal areas. One disposal area, :on the vvestarn side of .Hunterstown Road, was utilized for drum storage and burial.The other disposal area, east of Hunterstown Road, consisted of a lagoon where.vaste materials vere dumped. Waste materials were discarded in the areas from1970 to 1979 or 19SO, a period of 9 to 10 years. Among the materials disposed ofwere industrial solvents, paint sludges, and inert substances. Approximately 600drums were reportedly buried and/or emptied at the site. 6 Additionally, anestimated 590 cubic yards of paint sludge were dumped.

2.3 Sampling History

Chlorinate.! hydrocarbon solvents were detected in volatile organic analysis (VOA.)of samples frzxn home wells taken by Ken Maiiick, of Community EnvironmentalCon:.-)! (Ci::), in December 19S3, March 1934, and April 1984 (see appendix A).Ail r :he ho nes sampled were within approximately 3/4 of a mile of the formerwas:; diiposii sites. The analytical results are summarised below (see figures 2and 3 for locations):

richloroethylene (TCE), 1,1,1-trichioraethane (l,l,l,-TCE), 1,1-ichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), l,2-dichlorethylene, 1,1-

dichloroethane, and chioroethane were identified.

2-1

SERIES) USGS GETTYSBURG,PA. QUAD.

SITE LOCATION MAPHUNTERSTOWN ROAD SITEtGETTYSBURG.PA.

SCALE 1=24000 ___ CORPORATKDNi A Halliburton Company

Site Name: Hunterstown Road Si:TDD No.: F3-3505-06

o The highest solvent concentrations were found in the water samples of 7. veils, and all within 1/4 mile of the disposal sites (see table I and appendixA).

o Relatively low concentrations were found in 2 wells (see table 1 andappendix A).

o Very low concentrations to trace amounts were detected in 5 samples (seetable 1 and appendix A). »

o No VOA compounds were detected in 15 other wells sampled (see appendixA).

Similar analysis of well samples taken by FIT III in January 1985 also detected thepresence of chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents (see appendix 3, figures 2 and 3 forlocations).'7 Particularly noteworthy were the high concentrations of TCE, 1,1,1-TC5, 1,1-dichloroethylene, and 1,1-dichioroethane in samples from 6 wells thatpreviously registered relatively high concentrations 10 to 14 months earlier.Comparison of the analytical results of the 2 separate sampling efforts reveals thatthe concentrations are similar (see table 2).

Very'low quantitative values have not been reported in the FIT III sample results.The contract laboratory that conducted the analysis is not required to report valuesbelow confident detection limits.

Target compounds detected in inorganic samples collected by FIT III during thissa.ne sampling (see appendix 3), including those denoted as being of questionablequalitative significance, were within acceptable levels and posed no adversetoxi;oljical effects. H»

At the end of June 19S5, VOA samples of 10 private wells located alongHunterstown Road within 3/4 mile from Gettysburg Municipal Water Supply WellNo. 5 between the waste disposal areas of the site and Well No. 5 were collected byFIT III (see appendix C for results and figures 2 and 3 for locations). A VOA sampleof Well No. 5 was also collected. Analysis of these samples did not indicate thepresence of chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents.

2-2

Site Name; Hunterstown RoadTDD No.; F 3-8505-06

During :'"!.? June 1985 FIT III field trip, additional information specific to the areaof oo-iu.'r \ was sought to augment the limited information already obtained.

Information gleaned in the field is summarized in section 1.3 of the field tripreport (see appendix D).

A8I008W

2-3

LEGEND

.Sampled by CEC-O-Sampled by FIT III 1/85O Sampled by FIT III 6/85

Low to trace concentrationsHigh concentrations

•) KENNEDY

SHEALEH (JAMES)

hUA600N

6 SHRIVE RWEAVER

APPROX. LOCATIONOf BURIED DRUMS

TAUGHENBAUGH

LAUGHMANK. HOFFMAN-

0. HOFFMAN

SHEALERlCATHERINE)

WAOOELU-- WADDELH V. HEFLIN)

WADDELL(SANOERS)

KAUFFMANO /KESSLER

(S / LIGHT

SAMPLINGjLOCATIONS IN THE NORTHERN PART OF

ROAD SITE , GETTYSBURG(NO SCALE)

THE STUDY AREAF!GURE?-,PA. jf-IMUS

CGPPORATTCA Ha«Jburton Compe

O WAGNER

O 1LACK

O RICE

O I McDERMITT CONCRETE CO.

O2

GETTYSBURGMUNICIPALWATER SUPPLYWELL NO. 5

SAMPLING LOCATIONS IN THE SOUTH EF$l*pkflTapftE STUDY ARE AHUNTERSTOWN ROAD SITE ,GETTYSBURG .PA.

(NO SCALE )IMUfeCORPQRATXDT

A HaMtburton Canpan

, „

^

o o o rococo.—I r-l .—I i-v v v

^r • • un CM o CO'—'

7 -, , • O • C irt C^ OCM-- ' ^c Lfs co - • • . . .

ftRI008U9

-a wsCJs-

V V CO •— TCTl fO ': .. ia) <y<—i «3- o r ir> ja •". E c _

IDO3 ^«<N < U 2 : Iv u Ia I

LUCJ

c I— -l->i 2

Lfl < J_>£= CO O 4)— U (J•>-» «3 Cn3 !_ O!- I— O

(/l —)c c: o +jo o _> c••- u . CD*•» c: vi >o o c •—1. « t_> o O4_. 5_ .,± tnc s - r s ccs- 2 j-> cO O C r 3 < X S O O C r 3 r 3 COr— •— VI •— = =i— _ l - r - i. >»=rs •C f3r— i.i— <— ±- r3 r— +-J C " O S - =O C O O 1 — u_ «_ o >>l*-^: C .T .— O C <*-tj ^T'O'OOOO^: i— CJ+-> O cnCJCJ-J^i- °*oT-ocs:rziroo <u — — u 3-r-c4->3 rr+-> . rg rj . . . . > .= C f3^:<DOO -2i/> r33oo>Qiic_) -r- 301 o >a.iii<ii^ /2o *j o i—

*"'!/*

en

CM

0)

Coa.

uoa0)'a.E(O

il"*<—'cu•aC32(j~>

of *V

IT) • • -CM

c ^ J PO o i ^ oj cr\

«3- . o O •' •yscvi . . « v o O C M inrorooo • «r oo r«.eM co t—t • oo vo

-7,?/ CM O • ...•»• LO o i—• •—i cn en

H-O H- O H-0 h-0H-* UJ »—« UJ >—* i'' v—i UJU. CJ t^ O Lu CJ 11 ' <_j

s_at

14- CUO .C

a

•""-,***•**,

•'Of, -QIf a.1 Q.

'<>,,*C"- •-- w

/? * 2 oC ^ ^ ' g- S

c S?I =3 CO

'•> •« =-v s s

CM "° <-> CO—< * •*- 4J

1-1 t(- O

y•w y /•*/••-, * • .« CM

co « g.0)

•W «3I/I +JCO <T3

«O COui Ol r—

-> 23 CO

g 1«1 C -Sey rts x•M S- o03°C en Q.0) in Q.O ns <

CO co

HHI0085I

SECTION 3

•ftfii

Site Name: Huntersto-vaTDLD No.; ^3-3505-06

3.0 HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

3.1 Geology

The Hunterstown Road Site, and the surrounding area of concern, is situated in theGettysburg Basin, an arcuate-shaped basin trending northeast from the SchuylklliRiver and southwest to northern Maryland. ° It is 1 of 6 principal basins comprisingthe Triassic Lowland Section of the Piedmont Plateau Physiographic Province. Geology of the basin is characterized by Triassic age sedimentary, rocks of theNewark Group that were later intruded by Triassic igneous bodies, ' primarilydiaoase sills and long, narrow diabase dikes. *> -> 5» s> 9

Structurally, the sedimentary rocks of the Gettysburg Basin form a north-northwestward dipping (20 to 40 degrees) homocline. Along the northern part ofthe basin, these rocks are modified by a few faults, at large angles to the strike ofthe rocks, and local folds.!' A major fault, although discontinuous, is a northernborder to much of the Gettysburg Basin.1? 5

There is /ery little site-specific information pertaining to the geology of theHunterstown Road Site. The area has been mapped as being underlain by theGettysburg Formation (see figure 3).!> Records of local wells (see groundwaterssection) confirm this.2 Lithologically, the Gettysburg Formation is described asconsisting of red shale, red, brown, and gray sandstone, and coarse quartz pebbleconglo n irate and Jinestone conglomerate.^ -> 3, ;>, 3 These rocks ire thought to

hjv-s been deposited by coalescing alluvial fans. Consequently, beds accumulatedas overlapping tabular lenses, the lateral continuity of vhich -nay extend se/eralthousa-id feet.^ The thickness of the Gettysburg Formation beneath the

H jnc^rito -/i Road Site is not known.

\ go.itiy roiling to fiat-lying topography has been produced by the erosion of therocks of the Gettysburg Formation. The slope of the land adjacent to HunterstownR.oad, south of the former waste disposal sites, is gradual and to the west and south(see figure !).'•* Land elevations from the disposal sites to Route 30 viaHunters to v A'm|a0,Ot0 0nce of approximately l-l/'-f miles, are fro.n 560 to 500feet.^ "Drainage patterns throughout this area appear to be very mature. /f

3-1

Site Name: Hunterstown Road SiTDD No.: F3-3505-06

Surface ir linage is conducted by an unnamed tributary that courses northeast tosouth; i,: :.) Rock Creek.'4 Close to the intersection of Hunterstown and ShealorRoais, :-,3 v25tern branch of this tributary crosses Hunterstown Road and rurgeswith an east^n branch. The tributary then runs south-southwest and parallel tothe eastern side of Hunterstown Road for approximately 3/'4 mile before crossingthe road to the western side, continuing to flow southwest.

One-fourth mile east of Hunterstown Road, a diabase dike has been mapped (seefigure ^). The dike parallels Hunterstown Road, trending northeast to southwestfor approximately 1 mile.1' '4 Farther east, a diabase sill crops out as a rid,ge, thesurface expression of which has been affected by 2 parallel faults trendingnorthwest to southeast.1

At the margin of diabase intrusions, sedimentary rocks are reported to be alteredto some degree by heat and pressure.1 Complete metamorphism close to thecontact results in the formation of a siliceous hornfels.1 The presence of alteredGettysburg lithologies in the study area is not known; however, soils in the areahave been classified as belonging to a series that for ned fro n material weatheredfrom metamorphosed rock.3 This suggests that altered sedimentary rocks arenearby, and may, in part, underlie the area.

Fracture traces and lineaments, trending at various angles with no observablepreferred directions, have been plotted in the area (see figure '+).- These naturallinear fvjatures are interpreted as the surface expression of vertical or nearvertical fractures (i. e., joints or faults).1

3.2 Groundwaters

Th.1 >:•":• irrence and novement of ground water in the site area has not been•Jocj.Ten:ed. However, regional study of the Gettysburg Formation reports thatgroundwater occurs and moves through interconnected fractures, such as beddingplane fractures, joints, and faults.1 Only /ery small quantities of water are^considered to be contributed by inter granular spaces in some sandstones and

3-2

•S '.I1 --I..-

HUNTERSTOWN RD.

SOURCE: GEOLOGIC SURVEY MAP OF GETTYSBURG,PA.FIGURE 4

HUNTERSTOWN ROAD SITE .GETTYSBURG, PA.SCALE 1:50,000 GORPORAnON

A Halliburton Company

Site Name: Hunterstown Road Sit"TDD No.; F3-3505-06

The de/elopment of fracturing (that is, the number and width of openings) isconsidered to vary from bed to bed.1 The degree to which fracturing has developedis rust "i'.'<iiy dependant on the following:

o The composition and texture of the rock material composing the bed.1

o The magnitude and direction of the structural forces that acted on the bedto produce fractures.1

o The depth of the bed. Increased compression at depth tends to constrictand close fracture openings.1

Fracture development within the Gettysburg Formation has been directly relatedto permeability (i.e., with increased development there is greater permeability).1There may be only a few beds in a stratigraphic interval 100 feet thick ofGettysburg that have enough openings that are sufficiently wide enough to allow asignificant amount of water to be transmitted.1 The intervening unfractured rockbetween highly permeable beds may have little or no capacity to store or transmitgroundwater.1

The lenticular configuration of water-bearing beds and differences in fracturede/elopment have led to the Gettysburg Formation being defined as a series ofalternating tabular aquifers. Continuity of an individual water-bearing bed isestimated to be several hundred feet to as much as 3,000 feet in extent.1 Thearea! limits of beds may be due to faults and igneous intrusions, as well as pinchingout.1 '.Vatar-bearing beds within the Gettysburg Formation generally intersect thesurface within several hundred feet of a well, the distance being dependent on dip.Hydraulic connection between water-bearing beds is considered to be poor.1

\008563-3

Site Name; Hunterstown Road SttaTDD No.:_F3-S50>06

Pumping data seem to indicate that the greatest permeability, and therefore thegreatest [low of groundwater, is parallel to the strike of bedding.1 There has beenlittle drawdown observed in a direction normal to strike.1

Shallow water-table conditions are also reported for the Gettysburg Formation.1These conditions may be present from a few feet to tens of feet below the groundsurface, and are considered to change gradually to confined conditions with depth.The nature of shallow water table conditions in the Hunterstown Road Site area isnot known.

*•Well records for the area are presented below:

Static Water-Depth of water Yield bearing

Name (No.) Formation Depth* casing* level* (gpm) zones*

Heflin (468) Gettysburg 250 41 — 6 163, 195(shale)

Light ('469) Gettysburg 275 41 — S 206,259(shale)

Gettysburg Gettysburg 420 57 10 295 100, 200,Well No. 5 (sandstone) 260, 320(343)

Holiday Inn Gettysburg 220 SO 12 22 100, 150,well (344) (sandstone) 190

*Feet below ground surface g P I Q 0 8 5 7

3-4

Site Name; Hunters to vn Road Sit;TDD No.; F3-8505-06

The following additional information was noted in home well surveys conducted byFIT III in January 1935 and June 1935 (see appendix ZL). M•

Name________ Well Depth* Water Level*

F. Sanders 65V. Heflin 220S. Waddell 20D. Waddell 65D. Waddeli, Jr. 220E. Kauf fman — 25.5O. Black 94 25R. Wagner 35 20F. Rice 130R. Topper 40McDermitt Concrete Co.Office well 30Yard well 310

Well data seem to indicate that, for the most part, wells in the Hunterstown Roadarea are drawing water from water-bearing zones under confined or semiconftnedconditions (see appendix A for additional well depth information).

3.3 Sam piling Results

TCE, l,l,L-TCE, 1,1-dichloroethyiene, and 1,1-dichioroethane, the mostconsistently detected contaminants in the Hunterstown Road Site area, arechlorinated hydrocarbon compounds. These compounds are frequently used assolvents.

"•Feet below ground surface. RR100858

3-5


Several aspects of the results of sampling to date characterize groundwatercontamination in the Hunterstown Road Site area. The areal extent of thedispersion and spreading of contamination, based on the distribution of detectedsolvents in samples, broadly extends from adjacent to the former waste disposalsites to the south-southwest. The relatively low concentrations of solvents insamples indicates that they are dissolved, and that advection is the primary processby which these solutes are transported.

3-6

SECTION

*f>'&':-.. .

SRI

Site Name; Hunterstown Road SiteTDD No.; F3-8505-06

*.0 CONCLUSION

4.1 Summary

Sampling results demonstrate that solvents have migrated off site and into thedeeper confined or semi-confined groundwater system. The areal outline ofdocumented solvent contamination broadly extends from adjacent to the formerwaste disposal sites to the south-southwest, toward Gettysburg Municipal WaterSupply Well No. 5. The precise extent of contamination, however, based onexisting data, cannot be determined, nor can a contamination plume be defined.

tf

*.2 Final Conclusion

Geologic/hydrogeoiogic review of the available information indicates 2 possibilitiesregarding contamination of Gettysburg Municipal Water Supply Well No. 5. Thefirst possibility assumes that the geologic/hydrogeoiogic conditions of the site areaare characteristic of those reported for the Gettysburg Formation. It suggests thatwater-bearing beds are tabular and discontinuous, hydraulic connections betweenthem are poor, and contamination would be confined to the area in which it ispresently found.

The second possibility assumes there is a continuous hydraulic connection betweenthe site and Gettysburg Municipal Water Supply Well No. 5, and thatcontamination is continuing to spread toward Well No. 5. It can be estimated thatit will take 53 years to reach well no. 5. This figure was calculated in thefollowing way:

1,400 feet - estimated distance contamination has spread from the wastedisposal areas southwest to the W. Heflin well.

13 years - period of time between the initiation of waste disposal and the firstsampling.

= 108 feet per year - the rate at which contamination has spread.

5,680 feet - estimated distance to well no. 5.103 feet per year

= 53 years

4-1


This estimate is a rough calculation without site-specific permeability orhydrological testing and assumes the following:

o Contamination entered, dispersed, and spread through the deepergroundwater system soon after waste disposal operations began.

o Contamination is migrating at a constant rate.

o Geologic/hydrogeoiogic conditions are uniform throughout the area ofconcern. *

o The effe of pumpage by Gettysburg Municipal Water Supply Well No. 5 isminimal.

100862

4-2

(Red)

SECTION 5

100863

Site Name; Hunters to vn Road Si t-;TDD No.; F3-3505-06

5.0 REFERENCES

1. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Bureau of Topographicand Geologic Survey. Groundwater Resources of the Gettysburg andHammer Creek Formations, Southeastern Pennsylvania. WaterResources Report 49, 1980.

2. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Bureau of Topographicand Geologic Survey. Summary of Groundwater Resources of AdamsCounty, Pennsylvania. Water Resources Report 52, 1981. *

3. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. SoilSurvey of Adams County, Pennsylvania. May 1967.

4. United States Geological Survey. Gettysburg, Pennsylvania Quadrangle, 7.5Minute Series. Topographic Map. 1951. Photo revised 1963 and 1973.

5. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Bureau of Topographicand Geologic Survey. Geologic Map of Pennsylvania. 1980.

6. NUS Corporation, FIT III. Site inspection report. TDD No. F3-S404-07, March1985.

7. NUS Corporation, FIT III. Field trip report. TDD No. F3-3412-23, June 1935.

S. NUS Corporation, FIT III. Quality Assurance Review. TDD No. F3-S505-06,July 1985.

9. Lehigh University. Aquifer Designation Study; Ground-Water Basins. Volume2 3. April 19S2.

Ml 00861*

5-1

Site Name; Hunterstown Road Sit-3TDD No.: F3-3505-06

10. Hunt, Charles B. Natural Regions of the United States and Canada.Published by W. H. Freeman and Company. Copyright 1974.

11. Davis, Atwood, Quality Assurance Chemist with NUS Corporation, FIT III, withDavid Side. Meeting. August 7, 1935.

12. Quinn, Elizabeth, Toxicoiogist with NUS Corporation, FIT III, with David Side.Meeting. August 2, 1985.

5-2

ORIGINAL(Sedj

APPENDIX A

AR100866

\ Sk \) c Y\

'\

cc.es

A v'>\

3-21

s-n

3-11

vZlVuP,

\f= \ r''

YC-A

2%'i4/* i i!\'r>i L. , t i3-n

Y^, r — -

« f £^ *• ^ - 4< .J /. .*. f, ^ ^ •••

120

-loo

us

no'

u-V |s ;v .s/

Z75'VCrA ly^J,£^ '

Cc

T v-J-•3 y f"Y t ,\ \\-Trti >;"" ,VTP i -v" i.v

i

IS.>150.

<\.o

2.5

IZ.1.7

2io ^VZl""

1-17

\.o

I.5

<\,o<l,o2,1

12.

1,0

1.4-HSCL

4-sd

•5.\ u

3.555.

1.0

1.4-

ftfi

Cfjf

(L,

APPENDIX B

1

.> uOiwi •?•\<a a\z% If53 O*0 £*>- n$$ °<uQH

sS *£« %". < Ul51- >-,w S

0«n

•!C!

<u

i: j i j

x;

,

e8 *"E g88

II slI § 1s Io J * -P a.r- iu

1___LL__;C;C

\x

\

*"X

X\.\*v.X** \

—— ~>y

.

O\

^

^

X^r->X•?>

X*<Ax vM*rf

D

«*v>5a.

i"> (5n» —O 11_<!o$1'U Cf 1 01

0 I'

t|ulx

^•\

4

*£"3*

•5*."

fii*3

L rri.L-fijr

Xj

3^•0

~cr-

_«

,i1?c --1,»~*r»VJ

..

...

1

oc,* ~

>»

U

W ™\

vv1Hi

fi'

I1

5f-

o~•s

i

I

i->!

'5l

Vi-31-vo

)

. —

>

*£~03

hIIi

VI'Vjp*J

vj>

1

~i0.

11\^->,*(b^

>^

^1

fr1•-A ir-i<j :

rO

}\r3•~i«~n{=»VJ

i

1

ro

ii

.

Trnrr ——— •<

O !ir i

U? <-^ v5

1 ''-"I0/-I.pLv

i 1; if

ti

Xfv»

sc*v

o»-

Ci< >n

^r0"<i

___

ri

ij .i \._^ i «• o£ P<!,

'*>-r"\

&

1

i

i

i

«

cf>7

I

«J~r

>SJX(?r;s

i \_i r*i£

i

i

i

t

JCX.

11

1

•

j1

j% ' 'i1^ N-3*<

- -i*^\i_y.}

i:

ii :i !i >

«r

j ——————

!

1

r-ji

i[

i .

j ___ !

i

1^ ——— t

i

i

^»-" »c% $^ H* 1i

-".-.Rl1 '•')

i

i

irol;Cj<-/.>

H. <^>

' — J

OorMii

j

\,•;i

-,^I^ ••••:^^C2_.< Poop:1 «

,\

it

•

i

ii

r

i

ii

~loN*.

1>

3

|" *i«. -x2;

<j -:-?!.--

X

s t7. &

oja

•S

'-j 85 a

j

-sic"5.

I

.J— <3 "§li s§!"

!*

l"

k«

Jf ^^ 3Z 7.a. <O cu

APPENDIX C

RR100875

t>CL1=o

</i £njQ

a

.i <: a.t u

APPENDIX D

o

Site Name; Hunterstown Road SiteTDD No.t F3-8505-06

1.3 Sit* Observations

o Well water samples were obtained from water taps. The Kauffman,Kissler, Shupe, and Wagner residences (samples A5, A6, A7, and All,respectively) were sampled from the taps of the kitchen sink. Samplesfrom the Topper, Rice, and Black residences (samples AS, A9, and A10,respectively) were taken at outside taps. A sample from 1 well of theMcDermitt Concrete Company (sample A2) was obtained from a sink tap ofa bathroom adjacent to the office; the other well was sampled from a tapin the boiler building (sample A3). The sample from Hieges MasonryContractors (sample A*0 was taken from a sink tap in the office bathroom.It was noted while sampling this location that there were paint cans andpaint brushes in the shower stall floor approximately 3 feet across from thesink.

No water treatment systems, with the exception of an ultra-violet systeminstalled by the Blacks, were reported.

o Each private well from which a sample was taken has been located on atopographic map along with the name of the residents or company and thesample identification (see appendix B).

RR\00878

1-3

Site Name: Hunterstown RoadTDD No.: F3-8505-06

o .Only the Kauffman's well had been sampled by the PennsylvaniaDepartment of Environmental Resources (PA DER). The analysis of themost recent sampling did not show the presence of volatile organics. Theletter of notification of these results was dated April 24, 1985. Volatileorganics were the only compounds for which analysis was made. HeigesMasonry had a sample of their well water analyzed for volatile organics byAnalytical Laboratories. The results were negative (see attached copy ofappendix C). The Shupes also had a sample of their water analyzedprivately for coliform and volatile organic contamination. Analysis byAqua Treatment Services, dated February 22, 1985, detected 0.1 ppbtrichioroethylene (TCE). This laboratories EPA certification number is 20-276. The Shupe's sample identification number is 005681. The address ofAqua Treatment Services is:

P.O. Box 133119* Hempt RoadMechanicsburg, PA 17055(717) 697-4998

o The Blacks had a sample of their water analyzed for coliformcontamination. Results from this analysis were positive, and consequentlythe Blacks had an ultraviolet system installed. .

o Generally, well owners knew very little about their wells. Mrs. Kauffmanstated that Ed Shaw of PA DER measured a water level of 25.5 feet intheir well on February 13, 1985. Home well surveys were only distributedto the Blacks, the Rices, the Toppers, and the Wagners (see appendix D),who promptly completed and returned them. The information provided islimited and may not be reliable. Apparently, John Funt, a native of thearea, had done much of the water well drilling in the vicinity ofHunterstown Road. Mr. Sites, representing McDermitt ConcreteCompany, Mrs. Kessler, and Mrs. Rice indicated that John Funt, nowdeceased, may have drilled their wells. Mr. Orville Black and Mr. Fredice also both stated in home well surveys that John Funt had drilled their

APPENDIX E

AR100880

HOME WELL SURVEYI of 4

iHome Owner's Name: '" C-fXo/ fl /S~#&*~' Date:

^ / // —————

Address: r$ "1 rl A? t<i l&Zls*\ (SO Phone:

1. Please describe the type of home well you presently utilize:(Check those which apply.)

_____ Dug by hand'yL Drilled by a rig; if so, please identify company (name, address, and

phone):

Other (Describe)

la. Please estimate the following: Date installed ,/• Date of last service

Company who serviced (name, address, and phone):

2. Please describe the configuration of your well:

a. Total depth:b. Well diameter: /

3. Please describe the casing material used in your well:

a. CompositionIron PVC

b. Length (if known):

HOME WELL SURVEY

Page 2 of '4

Home Owner's Name: PcDt.TT M- ^f^ Date: ^j^

4. Please describe any screening material used in your well:

a. Length of screen: ______b. Depth of screen in well:

5. Please indicate the depth to the groundwater in your well (from the surface):

6. Please indicate the composition of home plumbing (pipes) in your system:Copper ^ PVC __ Galvanized

Other (describe):

7. Please describe the water pump used in your system:a. Location of the pump_ __ Inside the well (submersible pump); Depth in well:

Outside the well (indicate location): ///

b. Type of pumpBrand (if known):Capacity (gallons per minute):

c. Estimate hours of pump operation per day: "

d. Is storage tank used: __X_ Yes __ NoType (material) _______ Capacity

S. a. Do you regularly or have you ever added chemicals directly to your well?(i.e., chlorine, clorox, etc.) __ Yes ^ NoIf Yes, date last added: _______Compound (brand name): ____________ -« Q t n ft O Q O

of *

Home Owner's Name: UoWJ n- /<J\\''' Date: (

b. Please describe any type of water treatment you are currently using (checkthose which apply):

__ Filtration __Other (explain):Type: ____________ ____Water Softeners

Indicate Brand:

9. Please indicate any testing that has been done on your water:

Date of testing:Name of individual^) responsible for testing: ________________

' *10. Well use: __ Drinking ^ Other;

11. Do you notice color, taste, or odor problems with well water? ^ Yes/'If yes, identify:

Do you notice water supply problems? fi. Yes __ NoIf yes, when: Awr 6/frW how often: <3nt«- I* A M/

12. Please indicate the type(s) of waste water system used (check):Sewer Line _ _Septic Tank _____ Cesspool ___ Drain Field __Distance to Well SjT>

13. We may be taking water samples from many area homes in the near future. Ifyour well is chosen for sampling, would you be willing to allow our NUSrepresentatives to sample your well? Sampling involves collecting water fromone of your indoor or outdoor spigots.

^ Yes, I will allow my well to be sampled. n Q Q o__ No, I will not allow my well to be sampled. AR I OOoO J

of '4

i{ Qc\d- //.Horns Owner's Name: Ko$C} /( . / r" Date- 6 /It/ $"T

If yes, please indicate the time of day which would be convenient for us tosample.__ Morning __ Afternoon x^ Evening

14. In the space below, please furnish a rough sketch of your property, indicatingthe location of your well and on-lot wastewater system, if applicable. Alsoindicate the location of the spigot you would prefer us to sample.

ARI0088t*'

HOME WELL SURVEYi of 4

Home Owner's Name: ( /fr // <U- L,' P.i-__________ Date:

Address: //5" LLfjtA'Ji »-jfu/.-*J "Tt-J . Phone:'M/U V / ^ tr w


___t Dug by hand]/ Drilled by a rigj if so,please identify company (name, address, and

phone): ( /MA /at<CC Idj JLS J.'1 )

Other (Describe)

la. Please estimate the following: Date installed- Date of last service ' H/tL.

{

Company who serviced (name, address, and phone): _____


'7a. Total depth:b. Well diameter: (n"


a. Compositionj/_ Iron __ PVC __ Galvanized^^ | 00885

.^ /b. Length (if known): ^ 0

HOME WELL SURVEY

Page 2 o£ 4

& <tl -fl fi-ts ' C ' • Tl(LL,'Home Owner's Name: • • ' • LLlLLj________ Dare:


a. Length of screen:b. Depth of screen in well:


6. Please indicate the composition of home plumbing (pipes) in your system:_/_ Copper __ PVC __ Galvanized

Other (describe):

7. Please describe the water pump used in your system:a. Location of the pump__ Inside the well (submersible pump); Depth in well:V Outside the well (indicate location):

b. Type of pump. Brand (if known):Capacity (gallons per minute):

c. Estimate hours of pump operation per day:

d. Is storage tank used: v. Yes __ No** *^m m mm «« M™

Type (material) ti&Jbjrjju y Capacity

S. a. Do you regularly or have you ever added chemicals directly to your well?(i.e., chlorine, clorox, etc.) __ Yes i/ NoIf Yes, date last added: _______Compound (brand name): ___________

of 4

Home Owner's Name; f •'• V-i • f^U'J^_________ Date: <j'•-.2$

b. Please describe any type of water treatment you are currently using (checkthose which apply): /UJT-i'

__ Filtration __Othe/ (explain):Type: ____________ __________Water Softeners

Indicate Brand:


Date of testing: > ' o^TName of individual(s) responsible for testing:

10. Well use: l/ Drinking \/ Other: Odl QiL\.M.4J A!i i

11. Do you notice color, taste, or odor problems with well water? _ t Yes v NoIf yes, identify: __________

Do you notice water supply problems? _ _ Yes \/ NoIf yes, when: ______ how often: ________

12. Please indicate the type(s) of wastewater system used (check):Sewer Line _ _Septic Tank _____ Cesspool __ Drain Field v'Distance to Well (?Q '' - 7 5" '


_____ Yes, I will allow my well to be sampled.__ No, I will not allow my well to be sampled.

a a Of '4

Home Owner's Name; < • T( * ,' - Date. ; Q, A .

If yes, please indicate the time of day which would be convenient for us tosample.

—— Morning __ Afternoon __/ Evening


TI

HOME WELL SURVEY (3 !<.- c A.1 of 4

Home Owner's Name: fcl-d c£ Date:

.Address: n. < // U^TB R 5>Tc w V £ D. Phone; 3?^ - 3 6 3 *~

> .


__ Dug by hand"X Drilled by a rig; if so, please identify company (name, address, and

phone):

Other (Describe)

la. Please estimate the following: Date installed- Date of last service

Company who serviced (name, address, and phone):


a. Total depth: <? '4 F Tb. Well diameter: 6 ''


a. Composition___X Iron __ PVC

b. Length (if known): 3<* r

Pige 2 of

Home Owner's Name; 6 r' n L-t-C- fft-tf^X Date: _______


a. Length of screen: /y<? AJ _b. Depth of screen in well:

5. Please indicate the depth to the groundwater in your well (from the surface):•9-5-

6. Please indicate e composition of home plumbing (pipes) in your system:V Copper __ PVC __ Galvanized

Other (describe):

7. Please describe the water pump used in your system:a. Location of the pump__ Inside the well (submersible pump); Depth in well:\ Outside the well (indicate location):

b. Type of pumpBrand (if known): L-ft<VC/t5T£FCapacity (gallons per minute): T

c. Estimate hours of pump operation per day: / 6 T# /'•-»

d. Is storage tank used: -•?< Yes __ NoType (material) G /U.uX.ivz.c_Capacity /6>

S. a. Do you regularly or have you ever added chemicals directly to your well?(Le., chlorine, ciorox, etc.) __ Yes _____ NoIf Yes, date last added: _______Compound (brand name): _ __________

of '4

Home Owner's Name; .3/?>//->£•-£ ffi,/rCX____ Date: & - '>*


__ Filtration __ Other (explain):Type: _____________

__ Water SoftenersIndicate Brand:


Date of testing: 3 T\M&,» P^fi/vs tlName of individual(s) responsible for testing: A&L/4

10. Well use: V Drinking __ Other:

11. Do you notice color, taste, or odor problems with well water? __ Yes "XNoIf yes, identify: ____________________

Do you notice water supply problems? __ Yes X. NoIf yes, when: _______ how often: ________

12. Please indicate the type(s) of wastewater system used (check):Sewer Line ___Septic Tank V Cesspool __ Drain Field __Distance to Well __________ 7T


_ _X Yes, I will allow my well to be sampled.__ No, I will not allow my well to be sampled. AB 10089 J

of 4

Home Owner's Mame; OR\/)L.l~£ Bi/j CA Da:e. <_, -

If yes, please indicate the time of day which would be convenient for us tosample.>' Morning 1x Afternoon /"^Evening


1IF ft'° £&'£ IS AT

AR100892

HOME WELL SURVEY1 Of 4

Home Owner's Name; A^^t, 'ft/u^is^. Date: c S y - ^ ^ p r"Address: } £ S~ M QvCEl U-cuv bZ Phone; 3 .!) V- ,


__ Dug by handN? Drilled by a rig; if so, please identify company (name, address, and

phone): ______________________

__ Other (Describe) __________________

la. Please estimate the following: Date installed ___________^~ / ' vj fc>- Date of last service _________

Company who serv/icecL^name, address, and phone): ___________


a. Total depth:b. Well diameter:


a. Composition__ Iron __ PVC __ Galvanized

ARIb. Length (if known): ______

HOM£ WELL SURVEY

Page 2 of 4

Home Owner's Name: ______________________ Date: ____

II4. Please describe any screening material used in your well:

a. Length of screen: ___b. Depth of screen in well:


6. Please indicate the composition of home plumbing (pipes) in your system:V Copper __ PVC __ Galvanized

__ Other (describe): ___________

7. Please describe the water pump used in your system:a. Location of the pump__( Inside the well (submersible pump); Depth In well:V Outside the well (indicate location):

b. Type of pumpBrand (if known):Capacity (gallons per minute):

c. Estimate hours of pump operation per day: _____

d. Is storage tank used: V Yes __ No /;Type (material) _______ Capacity ________£___frfL

S. a. Do you regularly or have you ever added chemicals directly to your well?(i.e., chlorine, clorox, etc.) __ Yes V NoU; Yes, date last added: _______Compound (brand name): ____________

AfUQQ89i*

of '4

Home Owner's Name: ____________________ Date:


__ Filtration __Other (explain):Type: _____________ ___Water Softenersi*

Indicate Brand:


Date of testing: _______Name of individual(s) responsible for testing: _________

10. Well use: \[ Drinking __ Other: _________

11. Do you notice color, taste, or odor problems with well water?If yes, identify: ___________

Do you notice water supply problems? __ Yes V No——— — (^

If yes, when: _______ how often: ________

?__Yes Vf*

12. Please indicate the type(s) of waste water system used (check):Sewer Line VSeptic Tank _ V Cesspool __ Drain FieldV _

'Distance to Well


_____J£es, I will allow my well to be sampled.__ No, I will not allow my well to be sampled.

of 4

Home Owner's Name: Date-

IIIf y«s, please indicate the time of day which would be convenient for us tosample.

__ Morning __ Afternoon __ Evening


ARIOQ896

APPENDIX E

100897

1. COST CENTER:

ACCOUNT NO.:

3. PRIORITY:

Qf HIGH

(__] MEDIUM

[_] LOW

3. GENERAL TASK OESCRI

2. NO. ;REM/FIT ZONE CONTRACT _f|____

TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT (TOD) F3-8505- |

4. ESTIMATE OFTECHNICAL HOURS:

2004A. ESTIMATE OF

SUBCONTRACT COST:

5. EPA SITE 10: 6. COMPLETION DATE:

5A. EPA SITE NAME:Hunterstown RoadGettysburg, PA 7/31/85

7. REFERENCE INFO..

E3YEs [_]NO__] ATTACHED

[^PICKUP

PTIHM- Conduct a hydrogeological assessment of the subject site. (Enforcementsupport)

q <!PPr;IPir?L(:MPNTS: 1),, Contact Sue Belski 597-6680 for additional information.2.) The area of concern is Municipal well no. 5.•**' Determine if well no. 5 may become contaminated from wastes migrating

from the site and if so, make a reasonable estimate of when this contaminationcould occur.

4.) Obtain water samples from wells in the vicinity, if needed.5.) Refer to the attached fro additional information.6.) Prepare and submit report including allinformation obtained.7.) All work on this project to be performed according to: WP-SI-1, Rev. 1

11. DESIRED REPORT FORM: FORMAL REPORT

HTHCR (specif-

10. INTERIMDEADLINES:

^

*9

[3 LETTER REPORT Q FORMAL BRIEFING {__

12 COMMENTS- State code 042 County code 001

13. AUTHORIZING RPO: 14. DATE:

(SIGNATURE)

15. RECEIVED BY: 16. DATE:PI ACCEPTED n ACCEPTED WITH EXCEPTIONS ["_ REJECTED

&R 110898 „__(CONTRACTOR RPM SIGNATURE) IHF

1 Whitt- FITLCopy Shttt 3 Pink - Contracting Officer's Coov (Washington, O. C. )Shttt 2 Canary - DPO Copy Shttt 4 Golb«nrod - Projtct Offietf s Coov (Wiihmgton, D. C.)

' -"'•«<>• —— '" u/"^ "'/ ———————— SITcPANo. /V/°-i ///?" _______ DATE

TELEPHONEDRESS . eX^r- ~ S£**6 ' /?J ,

A. WELL

Location: ___________________ Driller:Type:Dug: __________Drilled: ——-V_ ^ Well Service:Total Depth:

_Uses:

Surface Elevation:Diameter of well:Casing material (length): _________ Type: __Length <Jc Depth of screen if present: ' __________________________Depth to Groundwater: __________Fluctuation of Water Level: _______ _Type of home plumbing: ________PUMP

Locaticn: ——————————————————— Capacity (GMPh: —————————— Operating Hours Per Day:

Setting: __________C. WATER QUALITY

Treatment/FEiraticn: ( t*'b<"J ft (t*s* Type:n(rt<Odor: _____________ Date first noticed: ______________Taste: ______________Cclcr: __________^Most recent date water was tested: _____ Most recent well service date:Who tested water: <______________ Location of sampling pointsNature of testings _______________Copy of results attached __________ Avail able from:

D, RE'.iARKS

FOR SKETCH OF LOCATION, SEE BACK

TDD No. r^-<r///-^-*———————— SrT£ eTTfSj //'PZ.PANo. N P L £>rf_______ D A T E B Y

X^ rf.y-. - f / syt ~j

/3_r p /V- /f.- TELEPHONE /X7- 3 </. ,^DQRESS

^7 }

______ _ ____ UA. WELL

Location: ^ <:< f' 4 t Driller: /, .

Drilled: _ _ _ ± _ _ _ _ Wdl Servi:Total Depth: jg.Td .

Ground Surface ElevationsDiameter of well:Casing material flength)s __________ Type:Length & D epth of screen if present: ' ________Depth to Groundwater: _________Fluctuation of Water Level:Type of home pi urn bingj C__d£ L£_J?

B. PUMPLocation: — ffia jxrng v" _______ Capacity (GMPhType: ^^——— Operating Hours Per Day: _______£-*T: no» £3 0 — T Q•JW-. W. j i » ^ - ** _____/ ^

C. WATER QUALITY ' ~ . ^ / .Treatment/FUtration: ^U^-^________ Type: C0-T-L~> > f-/ / t/ a. t/ '.a*?Odor: /|/fl_______ Date first noticed:Taste: /V Q_______Cclcr: /V 0West recent date water was tested: ^_____ xMost recent well service date:Who tested water: p £r _______ Location of sampling point:Nature of testings _______________.Copy of results attachesd _________ Available from: ________

(.

5RIOQ9QQ


SITEPANo. >rf _______ DATE BY

WNER 7 t ^ > Ta , /£ TELEPHONEtfj,

"•WELL ,Location: V fay!- V rcl. Driller:Type:

Dug: ___________

Drilled: Jfo* ~ Well Service:Total Depth: _; iT* /

Ground Surface Elevation:Diameter of well:Casing materiai (lengthjs __________ Type:Length <Je Depth of screen if present: . ______Depth to Groundwater: __________Fluctuation of Water Level: ________Type of home plumbing: Q 0

cation: ^-*w»/-__________ Capacity tGMPh _TyPe: ——^-'^ ———— Operating Hours Per Day:Setting: ^ 4 -

3. WATER QUALITYTreatment/Filtration: ____>ty,.> ~ ___ Type:

™ -" •*-- —- S

Odor: ____/</ g>_____ Date first noticed:Taste:Coicr:Mcst recent date water was tested: //>/.f y Mcst recent well service date:

*"* ™ * ™

Who tested water: .7) -T/ ________ Location of sampling point:Nature of testing; _______________Copy of results attached _________ Available from:

. REMARKS


TDD No. K-WV-**_________ SrT£ _ff7Tff Jif. /(/PiPA No. NPL £'"-?________ DATE ___ BY

WJER J)**i/rS ft/W/X/V TELEPHONEADDRESS ' <

WELLLocaticn: /%3<zA far J_________ Driller:Type:

Dug: -v^Drilled: —————————— Well Service:Total Depth: ____*_£..£ _Uses:Ground Surf ace Elevation:Diameter of well:Casing material Cengthfc __________ Type:Length & Depth of screen if present: ' __________Depth to Groundwater: _________Fluctuation of Water Level: ________Type of home plumbing: ________

a. PUMPLocaticn: &3*-s»tS>t /~________ Capacity (GMPfc ___TvPe: ——J S? Operating Hours Per D ay:Setting: ______________WATER QUALITY .Treatment/Filtration: ArdSl/*_____ Type: _____;___________Odor: ______________ D ate first noticed: _____________Taste: ____________________Cdcr: __ ,__Mcst recent date water was tested:, 3/j4/f</ Mcst recent well service date:Who tested water: _P2a'Xf______ Locaticn of sampling pointsNature of testing; _________________Copy of results attached __________ Available from: ________REMARKS

00902

FOR SKETCH OF LOCrATION, SEE BACK

WfcLL QUESTIONNAIRE

Ground Surface Elevation:Diameter of well:C asi ng m at ar i al (length jb __________ Type:Length <Jc D epth of screen if present:Depth to Groundwater: __________Fluctuation of Water Level: _______Type of home plumbing:

a FUMPLo<sticn: Capacity «GMP)i

A//V/ Operati ng Hours Per D ay:Setti ng:

C. WATER QUALITY r -: ^/^->^7 AxIrestmsnt/Filtration: v/y* ______,_ __ Type:

Odor: ___/C/C*_______ Date first noticed;Taste: A/ 0__________Coicr: /t/e> ___Most recent date water was tested: £// " / Most recent well service date:

f ^ ff f

rt'hb rested water: 23 £? /% ______ Locaticn of sampling pointsNature cf testings ______________ _Copy of results attached __________ Avail able from:

D. R2:.!

FOR SKITCM OF LOCATION, SEE BACK

NO.DANo. /. 'rf _______ DATE BY

ADDRESS

WELLLocaticn: /5a A Ycr* k_______ Driller:Type:Dug: ________

II

Drilled: ——y^_j? __ Weil Service:Total Depth: ___________.[__Uses:Ground Surface Elevation:Diameter of well:Casing material (length); __________ Type:Length & Depth of screen if present: ' _________Depth to Groundwater: __________Fluctuation of Water Level: ________Typa of home plumbing; ________PUMP

J32 -fSSHSt sLocaticn: ——JJ %*''*!<"* ' ______ Capacity (GMP); ___Type: —\/ ———— Operating Hours Per D aysSetting: ______________WATER QUALITYTreatment/Filtration: V*^________ Type:Odor: WO________ Date first noticed:Taste: AS (?_________Color: /I'dMcst recent date water was tested: 3//4ttf Mcst recent well service date:

X '< /

Who tested water: fiJT/2_______ Locaticn of sampling pointsNature of testings ______________.Copy of nssdts attached __________. Available from:

"). RE.V1ARKS

SKICI090U


APPENDIX F

W\00905

1. COST CENTER:

ACCOUNT NO..

3. PRIORITY:

[_J HIGH

Q MEDIUM

D LQW

8. GENERAL TASK OESCRI

REM/FIT ZONE CONTRACTTECHNICAL OIRCCTIVE DOCUMENT (TDD)

4, ESTIMATE OFTECHNICAL HOURS:

2004A. ESTIMATE OF

SUBCONTRACT COST:

5. EPA SITE ID:

5A. EPA SITE NAME:Hunterstown RoadGettysburg, PA

pTiniy- Conduct a hydrogeological assessmentsupport)

2. \0. -

6. COMPLETION DATE.

/' 7/31/85 )v _^

7. REFERENCE INFO..

0YES QNO

0 ATTACHE:)QPICKUP

of the subject site. (Enforcement

9 SPFClFir. EI.EMENTS: I). Contact Sue Belski 597-6680 for additional information.2.) The area of concern is Municipal well no. 5.•*•' Determine if well no. 5 may become contaminated from wastes migrating

from the site and if so, make a reasonable estimate of whenthis contaminationcould occur.

4.) Obtain water samples from wells in the vicinity, if needed.5.) Refer to the attached fro additional information.6.) Prepare and submit report including allinformation obtained7.) All work on this project to be performed according to: WP-SI-1, Rev. 1

11. DESIRED REPORT FORM: FORMAL REPORT

10. INTERIMDEADLINES:

J——— IP

(3 LETTER REPORT Q FORMAL BRIEFING Q

17 rouMPWTQ. State code 042 County code 001

13. AUTHORIZING RPO: t/*

15. flECE-VSD 3V-

Jo U £ A(SIGNATURE

;^ /

x • ' .QACCIP'TEQ Q ACCEPTEJJWTH EXCEPTIONS

/' ' (CONTRACTOR R/M SIGNATURE) " "~~"

14. OATEy / ^ _

/ /

_ IS. OATE: ., /-D "EJECTED |D! Q'QSl) &

• \\ fr ^ ., __• .l ^ ^ k•» /• ** *?^2 JI ^ B——————————————— ————— ' *S ** ————— 1 ______•

il ^ F

S ""-I I v\i -e — ?iTL Coov 5n*et 3 ? i« — Conrr jcr.'-<j 0'''Caf « Couv iWasniratcn. 0. C. i^•••ee: 2 ;.}'• KV — CPO Coov 3h*»! jOic«"'--.'a — * -.t;c: O:''Csr's C-ov VVjsn g;on D. -. )

trip report hunterstown road site epa work assignment … · trip report hunterstown road site...

Documents