trial of sea in project approval in lao pdr vivath sauvaly, enterprise development consultants co....
TRANSCRIPT
Trial of SEA in project approval in
Lao PDRVivath SAUVALY, Enterprise Development
Consultants Co. Ltd., Lao PDRSomphath SOUVANNAVONG, CPI, Lao PDR
Akiko URAGO, IC Net Limited, Japan
Table of contents1. Project approval procedure2. Comparative Evaluation3. Absolute Evaluation4. Supporting tools5. Lessons Learned
1 Project approval procedure
Ministries Provinces
CPI
National Assembly
Approved the budget
2 Comparative Evaluation
Education
Poverty
Health
Econom
ic
Environm
ent
Risk
Urgency
1 1 1.2 1 0.8 1 1.2
Project A 2-13-04-34-1
I-1 56 45 27 16 18 162 B 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 13.4 C CB
Project B 2-13-05-46-2
I-1 63 45 34 18 29 189 A 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 10.4 B BA
Project C 2-13-04-52-3
I-1 75 40 35 15 18 183 B 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 14.4 B BB
Project D 2-13-02-14-2
I-1 50 38 30 15 21 154 C 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 13.2 B BC
Project E 2-13-05-30-3
I-1 63 45 34 18 29 189 A 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 21.6 A AA
¥ñ©
½À²©/ R
ating
¯½À²
©¢º¤ î
½Àó
£¤¡
¾ Á®®¡½ê
ñ©»ñ©
ຄວາມ
ສອ
ດຄ
5ອງ
£¸¾
Àñ Ä
Ä©É꾤©
ɾ ¯½¦
ò©ê
ò°ö
£¸¾
Àñ Ä
Ä©É꾤©
ɾ ¯½¦
ò©êò
²¾®
°ö ¡½ê
ö®
£¸¾
¨õ ¨ö¤
츴
¥ñ©
½À²©
츴 T
otal
Project
NameProject ID
ການປະເມJນ ແບບຂາດຕPວ/ Absolute evaluation ການປະເມJນ ແບບປຽບທຽບ/ Relative evaluation
¥ñ©
½À²©/ R
ating
3 Absolute Evaluation
£¿«¾ £¿À¹ ñ £½Á
1) £¸¾ ¦ º©£Èº¤ 63
Ä©É¡ ¿ ö©¥÷© ½¦ ö¤¢º ¤Â£¤¡ ¾ Ä ÉµÈ¾¤¥½Á¥É¤ Áì ½ ÀÏ ¾½¦ ö®Ò? ********* 9
®ñ ©¾ª ö§š®º ¡ ĩɦ £¸¾ Ï ¾ ª Ò¥÷© ½¦ ö¤¢º ¤Â£¤¡ ¾ µÈ¾¤ «õ¡ ª É
º ¤®Ò?********* 10
À í¾Ï ¾ ì ¸´ ¢º ¤Â£¤¡ ¾ ¦ º ©£Èº ¤¡ ñ®¥÷© ½¦ ö¤¢º ¤Â£¤¡ ¾ Í õ®
Ò?********* 8
À í¾Ï ¾ ì ¸´ ¢º ¤Â£¤¡ ¾ ¦ º ©£Èº ¤¡ ñ®Á° ² ñ©ê½ ¾À¦ ©«½
¡ ò©¦ ñ¤£ö¢º ¤§¾©, ¢º ¤Á¢¸¤ Áì ½ ¢º ¤¢½ÁÎ ¤¡ ¾ ®Ò?**** 9
Ä©É¡ ¿ ö©®ñ ©¾°øÉÄ©É»ñ®°ö ¯½Â¹ ¨©Ä Éà ¥÷© ½¦ ö¤Â£¤¡ ¾ Áì ½ À
¯ í¾ Ï ¾ ì ¸´ ¢º ¤Â£¤¡ ¾ Í õ®Ò?********* 8
¢½Î ¾©¢º ¤Â£¤¡ ¾ Áê©À¹ ´ ¾½¡ ñ®£¸¾ ¥¿À ñ ¢º ¤®ñ ©¾°øÉÄ©É»ñ
® °ö ¯½Â¹ ¨© Í õ ®Ò?********************* 8
¥÷© ½¦ ö¤¢º ¤Â£¤¡ ¾ ¦ º ©£Èº ¤¡ ñ®£¸¾ ¥¿À ñ ¢º ¤®ñ ©¾°øÉÄ©É»ñ®
°ö ¯½Â¹ ¨© Í õ®Ò?***************************** 10
£¸¾ÀÏ ¾½¦ ö¢º¤¡ ¾ £ñ©Àì õº¡ ¦ ½«¾ ê†
ª¤Â£¤¡ ¾
¦ ½«¾ ꆪ ¤Â£¤¡ ¾ ꆣñ©Àì õº ¡ Ä É ´ 󣸾 ÀÏ ¾½¦ ö꾤©É¾ ¨÷©ê
½ ¦ ¾© Í õ®Ò?************** 10
2) £¸¾ À ñ Ä Ä©É¢º¤ ½¦ ò©êò°ö 45
¥÷© ½¦ ö¤¢º¤Â£¤¡ ¾ Áì ½°ö ¢º¤ ¼¡°ö ¢º ¤ ¼¡ ꆪ ¤Ä É ´ 󣸾 ÀÏ ¾½¦ ö®Ò ꆥ½À»ñ©Ã¹ É¥÷© ½¦ ö¤¢º ¤Â
£¤ ¡ ¾ ¯½¡ ö©°ö À ñ ¥ò¤?******************** 45
3) £¸¾ À ñ Ä Ä©É꾤©É¾ ¯½¦ ò©êò² ¾® 34
£È¾Ã§É¥È¾ ¢º ¤Â£¤¡ ¾ ꆽÀ ó Ä É ´ 󣸾 À¹ ´ ¾½¦ ö Áì ½À§ º «õÄ
©É ®Ò?***************************** 8
ª ¾ª ½ì ¾¤¡ ¾ §¿ì ½£È¾Ã§É¥È¾ ,Ä©É«õ¡ ² ò¥¾ì ½ ¾² ¾ ê ÉÀ¤º
Ä¢¢º ¤¤ö® ½ ¾ à ¯½¥÷ ®ñ Í õ®Ò?*********************** 8
ª¾ª½ì ¾¤ª ¾ª ½ì ¾¤©¿À ó ¤¾ ¢º ¤®ñ ©¾¡ ò©¥½¡ ¾ ´ 󣸾 ¦ öÀ¹ ©¦ ö°ö Í õ
®Ò?************ 9
£÷ ½² ¾®¢º¤®ñ ©¾Î ɾ¼¡
®ñ ©¾Á»¤¤¾ , ¸ñ©¦ ½©÷¡ Ò¦ ɾ¤, º ÷½¡ º À£‡º ¤ õ, Àª ñ¡  Âì ¨ó ꆥ¿
À ñ ¦ ¿ì ñ® ¼¡ ¤¾ ´ ó² ¼¤² ðꆥ½À»ñ©Ã¹ ÉÏ ¾¡ °ö ¢º ¤ £¤¡ ¾ ¯½¡ ö©
°ö À ñ ¥ò¤ Í õ®Ò?
************************************** 9
4) °ö ¡ ½êö® 18
°ö ¡ ½êö®©É¾ ì ö®ªÒ¦ ñ¤£ö Áì ½¦ …¤Á ©ì ɺ
´¥½ ó°ö ¡ ½êö®©É¾ ì ö®ª Ò¦ ñ¤£ö Áì ½ ¦ …¤Á¸©ì ɺ ´ µÈ¾¤»÷ Á»¤ Í õ®Ò? *********************** 8
´ ¾©ª½¡ ¾ Á¡ ÉÄ¢¦ ¿ì ñ® ½À©ñ ©É¾ ¦ ñ¤£ö
Áì ½¦ …¤Á ©ì ɺ´´ óÁ° ¦ ¿ì ñ®Á¡ ÉÄ¢¯½À©ñ 꾤©É¾ ¦ ñ¤£ö Áì ½¦ …¤Á¸©ì ɺ ´ Í õ®Ò? ****************************** 10
5) £¸¾ ¨õ ¨ö¤ 29
£¸¾ ¨õ ¨ö¤ê¾¤©É¾ ¡ ¾ À¤ò ´ óÁ° À®œº ¤ª í ¦ ¿ì ñ®¡ ¾ ¿Ã§ÉÁì ½®¿ì ÷¤»ñ¡ ¦ ¾ ê†ì ½®÷À«ò¤£¸¾ ¨õ
¨ö¤ê¾¤©É¾ ¡ ¾ À¤ò µÈ¾¤¥½Á¥É¤ Í õ®ÒÒ?************************* 10
£¸¾ ¨õ ¨ö¤ê¾¤©É¾ Àªñ¡ ò¡´ óÁ° À®œº ¤ª í ¦ ¿ì ñ®¡ ¾ ¿Ã§ÉÁì ½®¿ì ÷¤»ñ¡ ¦ ¾ê†ì ½®÷À«ò¤£¸¾ ¨õ
¨ö¤ê¾¤©É¾ Àª ñ¡ ò¡ Áì ½ ¸ñ©¦ ½©÷¡ Ò¦ ɾ¤ µÈ¾¤¥½Á¥É¤ Í õ®ÒÒ?**************************** 9
£¸¾ ¨õ ¨ö¤ê¾¤©É¾ ¡ ¾ ¥ñ©ª¤´ óÁ° À®œº ¤ª í ¦ ¿ì ñ®¡ ¾ ¿Ã§ÉÁì ½®¿ì ÷¤»ñ¡ ¦ ¾ ê†ì ½®÷À«ò¤² ¾¡ ¦ È
Áì ½/Í õ¡ ÷È ê†»ñ®°ò©§º ®µÈ¾¤¥½Á¥É¤ Í õ®Ò?******************************** 10
£½Á ì ¸´ 189
¯½À² © A
£¿À¹ ñ Á ½ ¿
§ £¤¡ ¾
³ º´ ¯½À ó £¤¡ ¾ Á®®¡ ½êñ©»ñ©
(¡ Ⱥ - ®ö©¦ ô¡ ¦ ¾£¸¾ À ñ Ä Ä©É ( FS) )
¯½À² ©
ì ½¹ ñ©Â£¤¡ ¾ :
¸ñ êó½À ó :
§ ¢º ¤² ½ ñ¡ ¤¾ ¯½À ó :
®ñ ©¾°øÉÄ©É»ñ®°ö ¯½Â¹ ¨©
****************** **************** **********: ********************* *********************** **********************************
£È¾Ã§É¥È¾
£¸¾ ¡ ö¡ ¼
4. Supporting tools
Comparative Evaluation
Absolute Evaluation
Program Objective Tree
Project FilingStatistic Data
Chronological table
Mapping
4-1 Program Objective Tree ( POT )
Title: Chronology Table Sector: MOAFArea & Year: Lao PDR Theme: M03-03 GDP growth rate of Agriculture
POT:
£¡ ¦ öêö®êô ¡ Ò¦ ɾ¤¦ ø
±ô¡ º ö®»ö Õ ½ ¾»È´
£¡ . ¯ñ® ÷¤Œ¡ Ò¦ ɾ¤ê¾¤¦ ñ ¨¾
LCBRŒ205¦ öêö®28% ( ¾£¿
£¡ ±ô¡ º ö®»ö¨ö¡ ì ½©ñ®êò©¦ ½
©ó¾¡ ŒÀì ò À² º ¦ ɾ¤ ñ¡ ¯¾«
£¡ ¡ Ò¦ ɾ¤À»õº º º ɾ ɺ ¤
511 ¥¿ ¸ 4 ¹ ì ñ¤ (ê½¹ ¾ )
£¤-¡ ¾ - ¹ ¾©-¡ ɼ¤Œ-² -
Ä»-£¿´ ø £È¾Â£¤¡ ¾
£¡ . ¯ñ¡ ¹ ì ñ¡ Ï ¾ À¢©¦ ½¹ ¤
¡ ½¦ ò¡ ¿®ô¤ê¾©¹ ì ¸¤
£¡ ¦ ɺ ´ Á¯¤¹ ɺ ¤¡ ¾ ª ɾ µ¾
À¦ ®ª ò©
£.¡ ¦ ɺ ´ Á¯¤ê¾¤ ¾§º ŒÎ
¾¡ ¾ 9 ¡ ´ (¯¾¡ -¤ )
£¡ . ¡ Ò¦ ɾ¤¦ ¸ ¦ ¾ê¾ì
½ ½ ħÀ¦ ©«¾
£¡ ¦ öêö®êô ¡ Ò¦ ɾ¤§ö ì ½ ½ê
¾ ¡ ñ® DIDM
£¤-¡ ¾ -©ö¤-Ï ¾¡ -£¾
8,960.00
£¡ -À ó -êȺ -Äì - ½2(¦ õ®ª Ò¡ Ò¦ ɾ
¤ )
VI.07 ¢½ÁÎ ¤¡ ½¦ ò¡ ¿/
Agriculture
T2.05 ¡ ¾À³ / Coffee
T2.04 °½Í ò©ª ½² ñ ¡ ½¦ ò¡ ¿º ˆ
Å/ Agricultural products
M03.03 º ñ©ª ¾À² † GDP ¢½Á
Î ¤¡ ½¦ ò¡ ¿/ GDP growth
T2.02 Ä É Áì ½ °½ì ò©ª ½² ñ
Ä É/ Wood and wood
R01 À œº ꆡ ¾ °½ì ò©À¢í¾ ¢º
¤¡ ½§¸¤/ Rice Production
In2.06 îµ¾Á¹ ɤ/ Tabaco
T2.03 À£º ¤ Ⱦ¢º ¤©ö¤/
Forest products
In2.05 À¢í¾¦ ¾ / Rice
R02 °ö °½ì ò©À¢í¾ ¢º ¤¡ ½§¸
¤/ Rice Produces . Ministry
3-01-04-37-1 2-01-02-26-1 2-01-02-56-3 3-01-02-50-3
2-01-02-51-3 3-01-02-125-3 3-01-05-427-3 2-01-02-212-3
3-01-03-194-1 2-01-04-388-1 3-01-03-299-3 3-01-06-484-3
4-2 Chronological table
IndicatorItemLao ItemEng Unit Type 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10
% Plan 0.00 4.20 4.00 4.10 3.66 0 0 - -
Performance 0.00 3.90 2.60 3.20 3.55 0.00 0.00 0 -
Ton Plan 0.00 0.00 800,000.00 980,000.00 980000 0 0 - -
Performance 0.00 0.00 750,000.00 850,000.00 850,000.00 0.00 0.00 0 -£ö /
PersonPlan 0.00 1,693,672.00 1,753,524.00 1,811,240.00 0 0 0 - -
Performance 0.00 ########## 1,693,672.00 1,753,524.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 -US$ Plan 0.00 0.00 ########## ########## 81510000 0 0 - -
Performance 0.00 0.00 ########## ########## ########## 0.00 0.00 0 -À»ñ¡ ª ¾/
haPlan 0.00 0.00 784,600.00 774,400.00 785000 0 0 - -
Performance 0.00 0.00 756,317.00 768,489.00 745,430.00 0.00 0.00 0 -Ton Plan 0.00 0.00 1,300.00 2,800.00 3500 0 0 - -
Performance 0.00 0.00 947.00 1,897.00 3,016.00 0.00 0.00 0 -US$ Plan 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 6,300,000.00 4100000 0 0 - -
Performance 0.00 0.00 5,722,816.00 6,000,000.00 3,910,000.00 0.00 0.00 0 -0 Plan 0.00 0.00 2,600,000.00 2,700,500.00 2800000 0 0 - -
Performance 0.00 0.00 2,375,100.00 2,529,926.00 2,568,100.00 0.00 0.00 0 -US$ Plan 0.00 0.00 ########## ########## 10260000 0 0 - -
Performance 0.00 0.00 ########## ########## 9,330,000.00 0.00 0.00 0 -US$ Plan 0.00 0.00 ########## ########## 2492000 0 0 - -
Performance 0.00 0.00 ########## ########## ########## 0.00 0.00 0 -
T2-02 Woodand woodproducts
M03.03 º ñ©ª ¾À² † GDP ¢½ÁÎ ¤¡ ½
¦ ò¡ ¿/ GDP growth rate of
M03-03 GDPgrowth rate ofAgriculture
In2.05 À¢í¾¦ ¾ / Rice In2-05 Rice
VI-07Agriculture
T2.05 ¡ ¾À³ / Coffee T2-05 Coffee
T2.03 À£º ¤ Ⱦ¢º ¤©ö¤/ Forest
productsT2-03 ForestproductsR02 RiceProduces -Ministry
R02 °ö °½ì ò©À¢í¾ ¢º ¤¡ ½§¸¤/ Rice
Produces . Ministry
R01 RiceProductionArea -Ministry
VI.07 ¢½ÁÎ ¤¡ ½¦ ò¡ ¿/ Agriculture
T2.02 Ä É Áì ½ °½ì ò©ª ½² ñ Ä É/
Wood and wood products
T2-04Agriculturalproducts
T2.04 °½Í ò©ª ½² ñ ¡ ½¦ ò¡ ¿º Å/
Agricultural products
R01 À œº ꆡ ¾ °½ì ò©À¢í¾ ¢º ¤¡ ½§¸¤/
Rice Production Area . Ministry
In2.06 îµ¾Á¹ ɤ/ Tabaco In2-06 Tabacodried
4-3 Chronological graphs3-01-04-37-1 2005- 0 2-01-02-26-1 2002- 0
£¡ . ¡ Ò¦ ɾ¤¦ ¸ ¦ ¾ê¾ì ½ ½ ħÀ¦ ©«¾ £¡ ¦ öêö®êô ¡ Ò¦ ɾ¤§ö ì ½ ½ê¾ ¡ ñ® DIDM
2-01-02-56-3 2000- 0 3-01-02-50-3 2000- 0
£¤-¡ ¾ -©ö¤-Ï ¾¡ -£¾ 8,960.00 £¡ -À ó -êȺ -Äì - ½2(¦ õ®ª Ò¡ Ò¦ ɾ¤ )
Project Graph
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
100.00
0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
00/01
01/02
02/03
03/04
04/05
05/06
06/07
07/08
08/09
09/10
Fiscal year
Plan
Performance
0.00 0.00 0.00
7,642.03
450.00236.770.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7,642.03
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.001,000.002,000.003,000.004,000.005,000.006,000.007,000.008,000.009,000.00
00/01
01/02
02/03
03/04
04/05
05/06
06/07
07/08
08/09
09/10
Fiscal year
Plan
Performance
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
50.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
00/01
01/02
02/03
03/04
04/05
05/06
06/07
07/08
08/09
09/10
Fiscal year
Plan
Performance
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
50.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10
Fiscal year
Plan
Performance
4-4 Project Filing
4-5 Mapping
4-6 EIA supporting tools
1-1. Sm
og emission
1-2. Dust em
ission
1-3. Odor nuisance
1-4. Noise and
vibration pollution
1-5. Drainage of
waste w
ater
1-6. Discharge of
solid waste
1-7. Cutting vegetation
2-1. Cutting ground
and earth fill
2-2. Dam
and alterationof w
atershed
2-3. Alteration of
water's edge
2-4. Water abstraction
3-1. Movem
ent of cars
3-2. Spraying chem
icals
3-3. Night-tim
e lighting
3-4. Em
ergence ofm
an-made structures
Substanti
al
1. People are livingdownstream of theproject site.
1-1 farmland or residentialarea near the river
- - 0
2-1 the trees are blocking - 0
2-2 viewpoints or scenic spots - - 0
2-3 outside recreation area - - - - 0
2-4 residential area 10 households> - - - - 1.7 - - - - - - - 2
2-5 farm land - - - - 0
2-6 cultural assets - - - - 0
2-7 roads - 0
2-8 astrophysical observatoryor star watching points
- 0
3-1 forest - - - - - - - - - 03-2 meadow - - - - - - - - - 03-3 marsh - - - - - - - - - 03-4 freshwater pond or lake - - - - - 03-5 rivers in the downstreamof the project site
- - - - - - 0
2. People are living in thevicinity of the project
site.
Environmental Check sheet
Score
2. Changing earth or water atthe project site
1. Pollution substances efflux from the project site3. Bringing into substances
into the project site
3. Wild lives are living inthe vicinity of the project
site.
5. Lessons Learned SEA is not fully applied for policy, plan and
program In the future Decree and Regulation should
be revised suitable for SEA
Thank you very much.