treating ms in 2025 - ms society reseach explored... · presentation. professor giovannoni ......
TRANSCRIPT
Treating MS in 2025
Gavin Giovannoni
Disclosures
Professor Giovannoni has received personal compensation for participating on Advisory Boards in relation to clinical trial design, trial steering committees and data and safety monitoring committees from: Abbvie, Bayer-Schering Healthcare, Biogen-Idec, Canbex, Eisai, Elan, Fiveprime, Genzyme, Genentech, GSK, GW Pharma, Ironwood, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Synthon BV, Teva, UCB Pharma and Vertex Pharmaceuticals.
Professor Giovannoni would like to acknowledge several companies and colleagues for making available data slides for this presentation.
Professor Giovannoni’s visit to Dublin has been kindly sponsored by Novartis, therefore please interpret anything he says about Novartis’ products in this context.
21 October 2015
4 December 1985
21 October 2015
4 December 1985
21 October 2015
?
The Future
Images courtesy of Professor Gavin Giovannoni /
ESRF end-stage renal failure
Epstein Bar Virus
Genetics
Vitamin D
Smoking
Risks
Adverse events
Differential
Diagnosis
MRI
Evoked Potentials
Lumbar puncture
Blood Tests
Diagnostic Criteria
Cognition
Depression
Fatigue
Bladder
Bowel
Sexual dysfunction Tremor
Pain Swallowing
Spasticity Falls
Balance problems Insomnia
Restless legs Fertility
Clinical trials
Gait
Pressure sores
Oscillopsia
Emotional lability
Seizures
Gastrostomy
Rehab
Suprapubic catheter Intrathecal
baclofen
Physio- therapy
Speech therapy
Occupational Therapy
Functional neurosurgery
Colostomy
Tendonotomy
Studying
Employment Relationships
Travel
Vaccination
Anxiety
Driving
Nurse specialists
Family counselling
Relapses
1st line
2nd line
Maintenance Escalation Induction
Monitoring
Disease-free
Disease progression
DMTs
Side Effects
Advanced
Directive
Exercise
Diet
Alternative Medicine
Pregnancy Breast Feeding
Research
Insurance
Visual loss
Palliative Care
Assisted suicide
Social services
Legal aid
Genetic counselling
Prevention
Diagnosis
DMT
Symptomatic
Therapist
Terminal
Counselling
Intrathecal phenol
Fractures
Movement disorders
Osteopaenia
Brain atrophy
Hearing loss
Tinnitus
Photophobia
Hiccoughs
DVLA
Neuroprotection
Psychosis
Depersonaliation
Brain Health
Cognitive Reserve
Sudden death
Suicide
OCD
Narcolepsy
Apnoea
Carers
Respite
Hospice Respite
Dignitas
Advanced
Directive
Rhiztomy
Wheelchair
Walking aids
Blood/Organ donation
Brain donation
Exercise therapy
NABs
Autoimmunity
Infections
Outcome measures
Web Resources
Pathogenesis
Double vision
What is MS?
NEDA
T2T OCT
Neurofilaments
JCV status Pharma
Anaesthesia
www.ms-res.org
CIS End-
organ PPMS
The therapeutic pyramid
Neuroreparation
Remyelination
Neuroprotection
Anti-inflammatory
The therapeutic pyramid
The Future
or
Futility?
Neuroreparation
Remyelination
Neuroprotection
Anti-inflammatory
The therapeutic pyramid
Consequences of increasing EDSS scores: loss of employment
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Work Capacity by Disability Level
0.0/1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 6.5 7.0 8.0/9.0
EDSS Score
Pro
port
ion o
f M
Sers
≤6
5 Y
ears
Old
W
ork
ing (
%)
The proportion of MSers employed or on long-term sick leave is calculated as a percentage of MSers aged 65 or younger. 1. Kobelt G et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77:918-926; 2. Pfleger CC et al. Mult Scler. 2010;16:121-126.
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Italy
Germany
Belgium
Austria
~10 yrs2
57%
7%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
CISers n = 40
Feuillet et al. Mult Scler. 2007.
Healthy Controls n = 30
p < 0.0001
Deficits were found mainly in memory, speed of information processing, attention and executive functioning.
MSers failing ≥ 2 cognitive
tests
Cognition in early multiple sclerosis
Brain atrophy occurs across all stages of the disease
De Stefano, et al. Neurology 2010
n= 963 MSers
11,000 to 1
Trapp, et al. NEJM 1998;338:278-85
Juxtacortical gray matter lesion
Intra-cortical gray matter lesions
Subpial gray matter lesions
Cortex
White matter
Types of cortical lesions
Social functioning
Pfleger et al. Multiple Sclerosis 2010; 16(7) 878–882.
‘Rebranding’ MS a dementia - definition of dementia
Dementia is a loss of mental ability severe enough to interfere with normal activities of daily living, lasting more than six months, not present since birth, and not associated with a loss or alteration of consciousness. • Interfere with normal activities of daily living
• Physical
• Mental
• Social
• Occupational
• Lasting more than six months
• Not present since birth
• Not associated with a loss or alteration of consciousness
“Multiple sclerosis is therefore a preventable dementia.”
DSM IV
Remyelination
Neuroreparation
Remyelination
Neuroprotection
Anti-inflammatory
The therapeutic pyramid
Remyelination
Nogo, MAG, OMgP Lingo-1-NgR-p75NTR GAP-43 NCAM Neuregulin
Slide courtesy of Klaus Schmierer.
Premyelinating oligodendrocytes in chronic MS lesions1
Negative regulators of OPC differentiation have been identified2,3
Investigating LINGO-1 as a target for remyelination
and neuroprotection/neuroreparation
OPC=oligodendrocyte precursor cells; NCAM=neural cell adhesion molecule; PSA=polysialic acid; RNAi=ribonucleic acid interference. 1. Chang A et al. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:165-173; 2. Adapted from Rudick RA et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008;8:1561-1570; 3. Mi S et al. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:304-315; 4. Mi S et al. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:745-751; 5. Cadavid D et al. Presented at AAN; Philadelphia, USA; 2014:P2.262.
In vivo effects of anti-LINGO-1 in rat optic nerve crush model5
Reduced neurodegeneration and increased axonal outgrowth (arrows) vs
control
Control RNAi LINGO-1 RNAi
In vitro effects of LINGO-1 blockade4
Mature oligodendrocyt
e OPCs
Differentiation
LINGO-1, PSA-NCAM,
Notch
Anti-LINGO-1 treatment
Proximal Distal
Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated cholera toxin B–labeled axons after optic
nerve crush and vehicle injection
Anti-LINGO-1 results in remyelination in animal models of CNS demyelination2
LPC=lysophosphatidylcholine/lysolecithin; mAb=monoclonal antibody. Adapted from 1. Mi S et al. Nature Neurosci. 2004;7:221-228; 2. Mi S et al. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:304-315.
1 µm
Control mAb Anti-LINGO-1
1 µm
Cuprizone
LPC
*
* *
*
Demyelinated axons * Remyelinated axons
EAE
New phase 2 study designs: Acute optic neuritis to assess neuroprotection and remyelination
1. Cadavid D et al. Presented at AAN; Philadelphia, USA; 2014:P2.262 2. Cadavid D et al. Presented at AAN; Washington, USA; 2015:P7.202.
RENEW1,2 Anti-LINGO-
1 (multi-centre)
Anti-LINGO-1 (100 mg/kg IV Q4W x 6)
Placebo (IV Q4W x 6)
Participants with first episode of unilateral AON
(n=82)
Randomised within 4 weeks of symptom
onset
Dosing period 20 weeks
Assessments at 24 and 32
weeks
3–5 days’
IV steroid
s End of study follow-up 32 weeks
Primary outcome: VEP
RENEW primary outcome: Anti-LINGO-1 and recovery of full-field VEP latency in AON
*Adjusted mean change in optic nerve conduction latency of the affected eye compared with the unaffected fellow eye at baseline, Week 24 (ANCOVA), Week 32 (MMRM). ANCOVA=analysis of covariance; ITT=intent-to-treat; MMRM=mixed-effect model repeated measure; PP=per-protocol. Adapted from 1. Cadavid D et al. Presented at AAN; Washington, USA; 2015:P008; 2. Cadavid D et al. Presented at AAN; Washington, USA; 2015:P7.202.
Placebo 100 mg/kg anti-LINGO-1
25
20
15
10
5
0 PP ITT
22.24
14.69
20.83
17.34
Week 24
34% Latency recovery P=0.05
17% Latency recovery P=0.33
Adju
ste
d m
ean c
hange in
Full-
field
VEP late
ncy* (
ms)
n=36 n=33 n=41 n=41
PP=Subjects who completed the study, did not miss >1 dose of treatment and did not receive MS modifying therapy
ITT=All randomised subjects who received ≥1 dose of study treatment
PP ITT
22.35
13.22
21.15
15.08
Week 32
41% Latency recovery P=0.01
29% Latency recovery P=0.07
n=36 n=33 n=41 n=41
Remyelination
Nogo, MAG, OMgP Lingo-1-NgR-p75NTR GAP-43 NCAM Neuregulin
Slide courtesy of Klaus Schmierer.
Agents in trial 1. GSK239512: histamine H(3)
receptor antagonist 2. BIIB033: anti-LINGO-1 3. Clemastine: anti-histamine 4. IRX4204 & Bexarotene: RXR-
agonist 5. Etc.
Neuroprotection
Neuroreparation
Remyelination
Neuroprotection
Anti-inflammatory
The therapeutic pyramid
Acute
axonal
tra
nsecti
on “Inflammatory scissors or
shredder”
Acute neuroprotection
Axon
NO
Microglia
Na+
Na+/K+
ATPase NaV1.6
Reverse NCX
ATP ATP
Ca2+ ATPase
Ca2+
Na+
NaV1.6
Na+
Figure courtesy of Dr Raju Kapoor ATP=adenosine triphosphate; NaV1.6=Sodium channel, voltage gated, type VIII, alpha subunit; NCX=sodium-calcium exchanger. 1. BD Trapp et al. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:278-285; 2. Bittner S et al. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2013;6:322-336.
Acute neuroprotection: targeting axonal energy levels may achieve acute neuroprotection1,2
Acute optic neuritis (AON) to assess phenytoin (neuroprotection)
Phenytoin
Participants with AON N=86
Phenytoin (4 mg/kg OD)
Placebo
Randomised within 2 wks of symptom onset
Treatment period 3 months
Monitoring period 3 months
Primary outcome measures
Primary outcome measure: RNFL thickness
RNFL thickness Macular volume
1. Kapoor R et al. Presented at AAN; Washington, USA; 2015; 2. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01451593;
Primary outcome: RNFL
• Active-placebo adjusted difference 7.15 mm (95% CI 1.08, 13.22 p=0.02) • 30% reduction of
atrophy in active group • PP comparison: Active-placebo adjusted difference 7.40 mm (95% CI 0.76, 14.04 p=0.03)
50
1
00
1
50
RN
FL a
vera
ge m
m
Placebo Phenytoin
baseline UNaffected eye
Placebo Phenytoin
6m affected eye
Bars are standard errors around the unadjusted group means
Delayed/ongoing secondary neurodegeneration1
“Post-inflammatory slow-burn”
Ongoing neuroprotection
Treatment Targets 1. Inflammation2
a. Adaptive (B-cell follicles)3
b. Innate (activated microglia4 and astrocytes5)
2. Axonal mechanisms6
a. Mitochondrial/energetics7
b. Axonal targets6
3. Remyelination8
4. Comorbidities/ageing (simvastatin)9
1. Trapp BD et al. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:278-285; 2. Loleit V et al. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2014;15:276–296; 3 Magliozzi R et al. Brain. 2007;130:1089-1104; 4. Rissanen E et al. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:939-944; 5. Mayo L et al. Nat Med. 2014;20:1147-1156; 6. Haines JD et al. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011;78:231-243; 7. Mahad D et al. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2008;34:577-589; 8. Münzel EJ et al. Drugs. 2013;73:2017-2029; 9. Chataway J et al. Lancet. 2014;383:2213-2221.
Targeting ongoing chronic neurodegeneration
Slide courtesy of Jeremy Chataway Chataway et al. Lancet 2014; 383: 2213–21.
BSI (Boundary Shift Integral)
Effect of high-dose simvastatin on brain atrophy and disability in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS-STAT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
www.ms-res.org
The off-patent drug bill
Trial activity targeting progressive pathology
MRI Events
1st clinical attack
Time (Years)
Subclinical disease
Inflammation
Brain volume loss
Neuroaxonal loss
Dis
ease
Sev
erit
y
SPMS RRMS
1st MRI lesion
Relapses
CIS RIS R-SPMS
RIS = radiologically isolated syndrome; CIS = clinically isolated syndrome, RRMS = relapsing-remitting MS; R-SPMS = relapsing secondary progressive MS; SPMS = secondary progressive MS; PPMS = primary progressive MS
Late SPMS: SMART STUDY fluoxetine, amiloride, riluzole
Early SPMS: oxcarbazepine
CIS: PHENYTOIN RRMS: ? DE-FLAMES STUDY
PPMS
PPMS: Laquinimod
SP&PPMS: Ibudilast
New antiinflammatories
Neuroreparation
Remyelination
Neuroprotection
Anti-inflammatory
The therapeutic pyramid
Flipping the pyramid
IMS, immunosuppressant; TNF, tumour necrosis factor Reproduced from Gut, Ordás I, Feagan BG and Sandborn WJ, 1754–63, 2011 with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Corticosteroids + IMS
Corticosteroids
TNF antagonist
± IMS
Conventional step care
Accelerated step care
Moderate
Severe Early top-down
Level of
dis
ease
Flipping the pyramid
Fingolimod
Fingolimod
Dimethyl fumarate
Alemtuzumab
Natalizumab
Laquinimod
Daclizumab HYP
Rituximab
Cladribine
Teriflunomide
Ocrelizumab
Ofatumumab
Targeting immune regulation has been successful previously in RRMS
Lymph node
APC=antigen-presenting cell; B=B cell; BBB=blood-brain barrier; CD=cluster of differentiation; CNS=central nervous system; IFN=interferon; IL=interleukin; MØ=macrophage; NK=natural killer cell; NO=nitric oxide; PC=plasma cell; S1P-R=Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor; T=T cell; Th=T-helper cell; TNF=tumour necrosis factor; VCAM=vascular cell adhesion molecule; VLA=Integrin alpha4beta1. Adapted from 1. Barten LJ et al. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2010;4:343-366; 2. Loleit V et al. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2014;15:276-296.
BBB CNS Periphery
Approved therapies
Investigational agents
Affordable DMTs
Unequal access to DMTs
www.ms-res.org
www.ms-res.org
Adoption of innovations
Rapid adoption of innovations is “biggest unmet need of all”
Adapted from Everett M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations
Large disparities exist in access to disease-modifying therapies
1. Hollingworth S et al. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:2083–7; 2. World Bank, 2015. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL; 3. MSIF, 2013. http://www.atlasofms.org; 4. Wilsdon T et al. 2013. http://crai.com/sites/default/files/publications/CRA-Biogen-Access-to-MS-Treatment-Final-Report.pdf
Australia
Norway
Denmark
Sweden
Belgium
Austria
Germany
France
Finland
Spain
Italy
Slovenia
United Kingdom
Poland
0 20 40 60 80 100
Newer DMT
Established DMT
No DMT
All people with MS (%)
All data are from 2013
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1–3
Established DMTs DMTs approved for relapsing forms of MS during the 1990s and reformulations or generic versions of these substances. Newer DMTs DMTs approved for relapsing forms of MS that have a different mechanism of action from established DMTs.
1st line
2nd line
3rd line
www.msbrainhealth.org
www.msbrainhealth.org
Baseline Month 6
Month 12 Month 18
Baseline Month 6
Month 12 Month 18
www.msbrainhealth.org
Neuro-restoration
Remyelination
Neuroprotection
Anti-inflammatory
Therapeutic pyramid
Anti-ageing
Brain
Health
Initiative
• Smoking
• Exercise
• Diet
• Alcohol
• Sleep
• Co-morbidities
• Infections
• Concomitant medications
• ? Menopause / HRT
MS-specific
MS non-specific
Brain Health
Symptomatic therapies
10%
60%
5%
15%
5%
DMTs Symptomatic Diagnostic Admin Blog
Neurologist’s Clinic Time – Prof G
Epstein Bar Virus
Genetics
Vitamin D
Smoking
Risks
Adverse events
Differential
Diagnosis
MRI
Evoked Potentials
Lumbar puncture
Blood Tests
Diagnostic Criteria
Cognition
Depression
Fatigue
Bladder
Bowel
Sexual dysfunction Tremor
Pain Swallowing
Spasticity Falls
Balance problems Insomnia
Restless legs Fertility
Clinical trials
Gait
Pressure sores
Oscillopsia
Emotional lability
Seizures
Gastrostomy
Rehab
Suprapubic catheter Intrathecal
baclofen
Physio- therapy
Speech therapy
Occupational Therapy
Functional neurosurgery
Colostomy
Tendonotomy
Studying
Employment Relationships
Travel
Vaccination
Anxiety
Driving
Nurse specialists
Family counselling
Relapses
1st line
2nd line
Maintenance Escalation Induction
Monitoring
Disease-free
Disease progression
DMTs
Side Effects
Advanced
Directive
Exercise
Diet
Alternative Medicine
Pregnancy Breast Feeding
Research
Insurance
Visual loss
Palliative Care
Assisted suicide
Social services
Legal aid
Genetic counselling
Prevention
Diagnosis
DMT
Symptomatic
Therapist
Terminal
Counselling
Intrathecal phenol
Fractures
Movement disorders
Osteopaenia
Brain atrophy
Hearing loss
Tinnitus
Photophobia
Hiccoughs
DVLA
Neuroprotection
Psychosis
Depersonaliation
Brain Health
Cognitive Reserve
Sudden death
Suicide
OCD
Narcolepsy
Apnoea
Carers
Respite
Hospice Respite
Dignitas
Advanced
Directive
Rhiztomy
Wheelchair
Walking aids
Blood/Organ donation
Brain donation
Exercise therapy
NABs
Autoimmunity
Infections
Outcome measures
Web Resources
Pathogenesis
Double vision
What is MS?
NEDA
T2T OCT
Neurofilaments
JCV status Pharma
Anaesthesia
www.ms-res.org
Services
NHS 1950
NHS 2000
Uberization of Healthcare
SMS
Private ePortal
Letters
Clinic
Group Clinics
Tele- phone
Skype
Apps
Blog Apps
Group ePortal
SER
VIC
E D
EVEL
OP
MEN
T
Lateral thinking
Is there a “Black Swan”?
Is the MS dogma wrong?
immune activation innate and adaptive
responses
focal inflammation
BBB breakdown
oligodendrocyte toxicity & demyelination
Acute axonal transection and loss
“autoimmune endophenotype”
axonal plasticity &
remyelination
delayed neuroaxonal loss and gliosis
Gd-enhancement
T2 & T1 lesions
brain & spinal cord atrophy
release of soluble markers
Clinical Attack
Disease Progression
Clinical Recovery
- biology
- clinical outcomes
- biomarkers
VIRUS (EBV,
HERVs)
Neuroreparation
Remyelination
Neuroprotection
Anti-inflammatory
The therapeutic pyramid
Neuroreparation
Remyelination
Neuroprotection
Anti-inflammatory
Prevention
The therapeutic pyramid
Neuroreparation
Remyelination
Neuroprotection
Anti-inflammatory
Prevention
The therapeutic pyramid
EBV Vitamin D
Smoking Genes
Conclusions: the ‘future’ in MS
• MS service development – ‘uberization’ of MS care
• Better symptomatic therapies
• Need quicker adoption of innovations
• Brain Health Policy (www.msbrainhealth.org)
• UK move up the league tables
• Affordable DMTs , particularly in resource-poor settings
• New legislation for repurposing of off-patent drugs
• New therapeutic targets
• Therapeutic pyramid
• Neuroprotection / Remyelination
• New trial design
• Brain Health
• New anti-inflammatories
• Daclizumab
• Ocrelizumab
• Cladribine
• Black Swan
• Viral and other hypotheses
• Prevention of MS