trcc meeting feb 2014 - connecticut

< < < Agenda > > >

* Introductions / News / Meetings

* Evaluation of Connecticut’s Participation in NGA Learning Lab, Improv-ing Data Linkage Systems to Reduce Traffic Injuries and Fatalities

* Creation/Development of a New State Data Plan* Data Integration of the Six Component Datasets of the State’s Traffic

Records System* Traffic Records Strategic Plan - Updating the Traffic Records System

Inventory* Brief Update of DMV’s Vehicle - Licensing System* Other

9:30 – 11:30am / DMV Multi-Media RoomSeptember 19, 2018

Safety Data

System

Next TRCC Meeting:October 31st, 2018, 9:30-11:30am - ConnDOT Hdqts., Newington, Conference Room A

TRCC MeetingHELPING SAVE LIVES

Connecticut’s Traffic Records (TR) System*Crash, *Vehicle, *Driver, *Roadway, *Citation/Adjudication, *Injury Surveillance

This meeting will include a greater focus on recently completed Nat’l Conferences, lessons learned, and specific content/presentations - for TRCC Stakeholders to follow up, depending on interest

Introductions

TRCC Road-Trip … Yea!July 1st Stop – State Police Hdqts

August – Milwaukee (Nat’l Traffic Records Forum)

Today – Dept of Motor VehiclesOctober – ConnDOT

Nov/Dec – Any takers to host?

Safety Data

SystemTraffic Records System

TRCC Meeting

*

* TN, NC and Nat’l TRF Session Attendees – liked CT’s idea

Free lunch!This is toughfor the TRCC to compete with!

We assume a number of TRCCStakeholders are attending.

!

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Data LinkageBrochure (s)

Brochures explaining the benefits of data linkage and potential for life saving and

injury reducing countermeasures

How many here today were involved in the 2017 Traffic Records Assessment?

Linkage Applications - Benefits

Traffic planners and roadway engineers have access to the roadways with the most frequent

and serious injury crashes and traffic citations, and therefore can use resources most effectively.

EMS and ISS agencies have access to traffic crash data that gives them better understanding

of the contributing circumstances surrounding injuries. Also crash location and time data helps EMS improve response times.

Helps target educational campaigns against drunk driving and seat belt non-compliance at

the correct demographic groups.

Ensures that high-visibility law enforcement is conducted in areas targeted for most frequent

and serious injury crashes and traffic citations, reducing costs and putting resources where they are most effective.

Law enforcement can verify in-state registered vehicles and drivers in real-time.

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Getting toZero

“O”

… can achieve morethan individualorganizations

workingindependently

Traffic fatalities and injuriesare preventable

A future with zero traffic deathsis more certain than ever with the emergence of automated vehiclesand the Safe Systems transportation approach

A coordinated effort thatbrings together multiplestakeholders withthe same goal …

National Traffic Records Forum MIlwaukee

GHSA Rallies Stakeholders to Advance Traffic Safety - to Get to Zero

The GHSA 2018 Annual Meeting considered how states, the federal government, industry partners, and others could best work together to advance traffic safety.

Connecticut’s Participation in NGA Learning Lab

on Improving Data Linkage Systems

to Reduce Traffic Injuries and Fatalities

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Goal #1 - Increase Access and Sharing of DataThe Connecticut Team set a goal of increasing data sharingacross state agencies to increase data linkage and analysiscapabilities

Goal #2 - Market, and educate on, the importance ofdata linkages

The Connecticut Team set a goal of increasing education andoutreach for the importance of data linkage

*National Governor’s Association (NGA)

CT Team

Conference call with NGA Representative - July 2018Updates - implementing State Action Plan - Goal #1

Judicial - MOU with UConn to be able to provide 10 years of Judicial data (2016 back to 2006) for inclusion in centralized repository

CT Team continued documentation of data dictionaries from several state agencies, submitted as part of the 2017 traffic records assessment. Plans are to review, update, maintain, and to continue adding content to these documents

CT Team discussed potential for CDC funding to support DPH data system improvements serving to benefit multiple public health challenges, e.g., opioid ODs, as well as Traffic Safety

CT Team discussed UConn focus on database development project, partnering with DPH to help meet their needs

CT Team discussed leveraging the need for partnerships in shared/linked data to be able to address multiple missions

Conference call with NGA Representative - July 2018Updates - implementing State Action Plan - Goal #2

CT Team continued to fine-tune brochure explaining the benefits of data linkage and potential for life saving and injury reducing countermeasures; brochure was presented during the June 2018 meeting of the TRCC

CT Team discussed plans to engage the State Chief Data Officer in a roundtable discussion with Traffic Records Stakeholders / Data Stewards representing each of the six core traffic records datasets in the State - targeted for Sept 2018 TRCC Meeting

CT Team continued to discuss the designation and establishment of a formal centralized repository to serve as the host and integrator of data. It is anticipated this will be a topic of discussion for the Sept 2018 TRCC Meeting

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Conference Call -

- - - - - - - - - - - monthly calls with NGA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CT Team

Project Evaluationt

*

we are here

SeptTRCC

*

*Sept. 7Letter to the Governor

September 2018 TRCC Meeting/Discussion

Plans include kicking off a discussion involving the State Chief Data Officer, and the Director of the CTSRC at UConn, and the Data Stewards for the six core datasets of the State traffic records system, to update everyone as to where this effort stands in Connecticut; and planned next steps

Plans are for this meeting to be a natural extension of what the TRCC will be focusing on during the next several months, an evaluation/update of the traffic records strategic plan, focusing on the previous year since a NHTSA assessment was conducted of the State’s traffic records system

NHTSA is encouraging states to review the conclusions from their assessments annually to gauge how they are addressing them in their assessment reports

Creation/Development

of a New

State Data Plan

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

State Data Plan

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Plan - Focal Points

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Plan - Focal Points

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Plan - Goals

Plan - Principles

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

The following are a series of suggested principles intended to help guide state agencies. Once finalized, these principles will be supplemented with more specific actions.

Data Integration

of the

Six Traffic Records ComponentDatasets

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Traffic Records Six-Pack

Performance Measure Six-Pack

Ideal Traffic Records System

Data Integration

Ideal Traffic Records System

Data Integration vs. Interface Linkage

Multiple Data Systems

LLEA OTH

Data Integration - a linking of the six-pack components to support in-depth analysisimpossible to achieve if based solely on the contents of any singular data system.

Crash/DriverCrash/Vehicle

Citation/AdjudicationCrash/Injury Surveillance System

Crash/Roadway

Agency

Data Integration

Traffic Records SystemTRCC Meeting

Multiple Data Systems

LLEA OTH

Interface Linkage - a seamless, on-demand connectivity and a high degree ofinteroperability between systems that supports critical business processes

Crash/Driver Driver/Vehicle

Citation/Adjudication

Injury Surveillance System

Roadway

Agency

Interface Linkage


Data Integration

Creating the Ideal Highway Safety Data System

Traffic Records System

TRCC Meeting


Kerry Ross

Al Iallanardo

Cindy Zuerblis

Dan Silbo

Stacey Manware

Ann Kloter

*Data Stewards

*

*

*

*

*

*

Centralized Data Warehouse to Integrate All Six Data Systems

Security to House and Protect all Personalized Information

Data Analysis and Visualization will be

Redacted and Restricted in a way that will not allow Anyone to

Determine Individual Information

Data Collected and Integrated should

provide the Ability to Answer some of the

most Complex Transportation Safety

Questions

How Effective is the Current DUI Program at

Reducing and Preventing Future

DUIs?

How many DUI Crashes Involve a Person who has had Multiple DUIs?

How do Injury Classifications by the Officer at the Scene of a Crash compare to Actual Injuries Treated at the Hospital?

What Trends are we Seeing

in Drugged

orDrunk

Driving?

Traffic Records Strategic Plan

Updating the

Traffic Records

System Inventory

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Safety Data

SystemTraffic Records

System

for each TR Six Pack Component

TRCC Meeting

Data Inventory

Updates from 2017 Assessment Assessment Questions - SME Findings

Are there edit checks and data collection guidelines for each data element?

The data dictionary, AAMVA D.20 manual, and a sample of additional data dictionary elements indicates field values and data descriptions, but does not detail edit checks.

Is there a process flow diagram that outlines the driver data system’s key data process flows, including inputs from other data systems?

The DMV does not have a process flow diagram that outlines key process flows and inputs from other systems.

Are there established processes to detect false identity licensure fraud?

An identity theft procedure has been developed, but processes are based on manual intervention. Automated, process-based detection is key to unearthing internal fraud issues.

Updates from 2017 Assessment Assessment Questions - SME Findings

Does the DMV have the capability to grant authorized law enforcement personnel access to information in the driver system?

The DMV provides its data to law enforcement; however, it is unclear what the COLLECT protocols are for granting that access to law enforcement.

Is there a formal, comprehensive data quality management program for the driver system?

DMV does not have such a program. Instead, it utilizes external tools/resources to improve data quality.

Is data quality feedback from key users regularly communicated to data collectors and data managers?

While it is clear that errors are reported to IT, errors can be initiated in many ways and feedback should be provided to those who would benefit from the reporting, particularly, those inputting the incorrect data into the system.

http://www.ct.gov/dot/cwp/view.asp?a=2094&q=435916

Crash Data SystemCitation Data SystemRoadway Data SystemInjury Surveillance SystemDriver Data SystemVehicle Data System

page 3-9“ 10-18“ 19-26“ 27-42“ 43-51“ 52-59

Content for these Six Core Systems / posted to the TRCC website

Posted in an Outline Format- Intro to CT’s Traffic Records System- Data Stewards - Six Core Systems - A Little about Each System

- Questions (Qs) as Addressed inRecent Traffic Records Assessment

- Qs about each TR Six Pack Dataset- Qs re. Guidelines & Standards- Qs re. Data Dictionaries- Qs re. Procedures/Process Flows- Qs re. Interface with Other Components- Qs re. Data Quality Control

Brief Update

of

DMV’s

Vehicle - Licensing System

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Connecticut Integrated Vehicle & Licensing System

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

TR Strategic PlanTraffic Records Assessment

Major Recommendations forImproving

Connecticut’s Traffic Records System



- August 2018 update

Traffic RecordsStrategic Plan - Recommendations

o Since the 2017 Traffic Records Assessment, we’ve been tracking 26 major recommendations … updating the status as things have progressed, e.g., recent focus on the Traffic Records Inventory

o NHTSA would like us to expand our efforts to track progress

How are we addressing the major recommendations / how do we measure progress?

If we’re not currently addressing recommendations … why?

o NHTSA would like stakeholders to provide updates during TRCC meetings of their respective agency’s progress, e.g., traffic records inventory, performance measures, data quality, documentation, etc.

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Safety Data


TRCC Meeting

Milwaukee - August 12-15

GHSA Annual ConferenceAtlanta - August 25-29

Upcoming Training/WebinarsDates/Locations

Other -Nat’l Traffic Records Forum

Data Sharing: What's the Worst that Could Happen?Startups are producing lots of transit data that could help inform governmentpolicy — but not everyone agrees on what should be shared.

BY BEN MILLER / SEPTEMBER 1, 2018

On one side, there’s the public sector, surprised by a sudden flurry of private transportation companies offering scooters, bicycles, skateboards and car rides. The government has seen rapid disruption of transportation before; it knows that it can be unsafe and inequitable for the public as a whole. So it asks those companies for information, to try to better see what it is they are doing.

But then there are the companies, wary of further fraying society’s already-thinning trust that the tech sector cares about individual privacy.

Between the two is a balancing act of public interests versus individual concerns. And there are a lot of unanswered questions about what the right balance is. But government has been here before.

One morning in March 2018, San Franciscans woke up to scooters. Startups — some of which had already put electric, shareable bicycles on the city’s streets — started out with a few, and they were met with a lot of user demand. So they sent out more. And as the scooters began to cover the streets, residents began voicing their displeasure: Scooters were blocking the paths of people with disabilities. People were riding them unsafely, without helmets and sometimes in traffic. So the city started considering the issue. Were the scooters worth it? Were they competing with transit, or bringing more riders to buses and trains? Were they helping people get around without cars?

Questions?

trcc meeting feb 2014 - connecticut

Documents