transverse vibration of eulerbeam-iitg

20
  CHAPTER 14 TRANSVERSE VIBRATION OF EULER BEAM It was recognized by the early researchers that the bending effect is the single most important factor in a transversely vibrating beam. The Euler-Bernoulli model includes the strain energy due to the bending and the kinetic energy due to the lateral displacement. The Euler-Bernoulli model dates back to the 18th century. Jacob Bernoulli (1654-1705) first discovered that the curvature of an elastic beam at any point is proportional to the bending moment at that point. Daniel Bernoulli (1700-1782), nephew of Jacob, was the first one who formulated the differential equation of motion of a vibrating beam. Later, Jacob Bernoulli's theory was accepted by Leonhard Euler (1707}1783) in his investigation of the shape of elastic beams under various loading conditions. Many advances on the elastic curves were made by Euler. The Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, sometimes called the classical beam theory, Euler beam theory, Bernoulli beam theory, or Bernoulli-Euler beam theory, is the most commonly used because it is simple and provides reasonable engineering approximations for many problems. However, the Euler-Bernoulli model tends to slightly overestimate the natural frequencies. This problem is exacerbated for the natural frequencies of the higher modes. Mathematical formulation: w  x dx  Figure 1: A beam under transverse vibration Consider a long slender beam as shown in figure 1 subjected to transverse vibration. The free  body diag ram of an element of the beam is shown in the figure 2. Here, is the bending moment, is the shear force, and is the external force per unit length of the beam. Since the inertia force acting on the element of the beam is ) , (  t  x  M ) , (  t  x V ) , (  t  x  f 2 2 ) , ( ) ( t t  x w dx  x  A  ρ  247

Upload: lakshman-reddy

Post on 05-Nov-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Transverse vibration of Euler Beam is described here.

TRANSCRIPT

  • CHAPTER 14 TRANSVERSE VIBRATION OF EULER BEAM It was recognized by the early researchers that the bending effect is the single most important

    factor in a transversely vibrating beam. The Euler-Bernoulli model includes the strain energy due

    to the bending and the kinetic energy due to the lateral displacement. The Euler-Bernoulli model

    dates back to the 18th century. Jacob Bernoulli (1654-1705) first discovered that the curvature of

    an elastic beam at any point is proportional to the bending moment at that point. Daniel Bernoulli

    (1700-1782), nephew of Jacob, was the first one who formulated the differential equation of

    motion of a vibrating beam. Later, Jacob Bernoulli's theory was accepted by Leonhard Euler

    (1707}1783) in his investigation of the shape of elastic beams under various loading conditions.

    Many advances on the elastic curves were made by Euler. The Euler-Bernoulli beam theory,

    sometimes called the classical beam theory, Euler beam theory, Bernoulli beam theory, or

    Bernoulli-Euler beam theory, is the most commonly used because it is simple and provides

    reasonable engineering approximations for many problems. However, the Euler-Bernoulli model

    tends to slightly overestimate the natural frequencies. This problem is exacerbated for the natural

    frequencies of the higher modes.

    Mathematical formulation:

    w

    xdx

    Figure 1: A beam under transverse vibration

    Consider a long slender beam as shown in figure 1 subjected to transverse vibration. The free

    body diagram of an element of the beam is shown in the figure 2. Here, is the bending

    moment, is the shear force, and is the external force per unit length of the beam.

    Since the inertia force acting on the element of the beam is

    ),( txM

    ),( txV ),( txf

    2

    2 ),()(t

    txwdxxA

    247

  • Figure 2: Freebody diagram of a section of a beam under transverse vibration

    balancing the forces in direction gives z

    2

    2 ),()(),()(t

    txwdxxAVdxtxfdVV =+++ ,

    where is the mass density and is the cross-sectional area of the beam. The moment equation about the

    )(xA

    y axis leads to

    02

    ),()()( =+++ MdxdxtxfdxdVVdMM

    By writing

    dxxVdV = and dx

    xMdM =

    and disregarding terms involving second powers in , the above equations can be written as dx

    2

    2 ),()(),(),(t

    txwxAtxfx

    txV

    =+

    0),(),( = txV

    xtxM

    By using the relation x

    MV = from above two equations

    2

    2

    2

    2 ),()(),(),(t

    txwxAtxfx

    txM

    =+

    248

  • From the elementary theory of bending of beam, the relationship between bending moment and

    deflection can be expressed as

    2

    2 ),()(),(x

    txwxEItxM =

    where E is the Youngs modulus and is the moment of inertia of the beam cross section

    about the axis. Inserting above two equations, we obtain the equation of the motion for the

    forced transverse vibration of a non-uniform beam:

    )(xI

    y

    ),(),()(),()( 22

    2

    2

    2

    2

    txft

    txwxAx

    txwxEIx

    =+

    For a uniform beam above equation reduces to

    ),(),()(),()( 22

    4

    4

    txft

    txwxAx

    txwxEI =+

    For free vibration, , and so the equation of motion becomes 0),( =txf

    0),(),( 22

    4

    42 =

    +

    ttxw

    xtxwc

    where

    AEIc =

    Initial Conditions:

    Since the equation of the motion involves a second order derivative with respect to time and a

    fourth order derivative with respect to , two initial equations and four boundary conditions are

    needed for finding a unique solution for . Usually, the values of transverse displacement

    and velocity are specified as and at

    x

    ),( txw

    )(0 xw )(0.

    xw 0=t , so that the initial conditions become:

    )()0,( 0 xwtxw ==

    )()0,( 0.

    xwttxw ==

    Free Vibration:

    The free vibration solution can be found using the method of separation of variables as

    )()(),( tTxWtxw =

    249

  • Substituting this equation in the final equation of motion and rearranging leads to

    22

    2

    4

    42 )()(

    1)()(

    === adt

    tTdtTdx

    xWdxW

    c

    where is a positive constant. Above equation can be written as two equations: 2=a0)()( 44

    4

    = xWdx

    xWd

    0)()( 222

    =+ tTdt

    tTd where,

    EIA

    c

    2

    2

    24 ==

    The solution to time dependent equation can be expressed as

    tBtAtT sincos)( += where, A and B are constant that can be found from the initial conditions. For the solution of

    displacement dependent equation we assume, sxCexW =)(

    where C and are constant, and derive the auxiliary equation as: s

    =2,1s , is =2,1 Hence the solution of the equation becomes:

    xixixx eCeCeCeCxW +++= 4321)( where , , and are constant. Above equation can also be expressed as: 1C 2C 3C 4C

    xCxCxCxCxW sinhcoshsincos)( 4321 +++= or,

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( xxCxxCxxCxxCxW ) sinhsinsinhsincoshcoscoshcos)( 4321 ++++++= The constants , , and can be found from boundary conditions. The natural frequencies

    of the beam are computed from:

    1C 2C 3C 4C

    ( ) 422 AlEIl

    AEI

    ==

    250

  • The function is known as normal mode or characteristic function of the beam and )(xW is called the natural frequency of vibration. For any beam, there will be infinite number of normal

    modes with one natural frequency associated with each normal mode. The unknown

    constant , , and and value of 1C 2C 3C 4C can be determined from boundary conditions of the beam.

    Boundary Conditions:

    Hinged, M(0, t) =0, D(0, t) =0; Free, M(0, t)=0, Q(0, t)=0

    1. Free End:

    Bending Moment = 022

    =

    xwEI ,

    Shear Force = 022

    =

    xwEI

    x.

    2. Simply supported (pinned) end:

    Bending Moment = 022

    =

    xwEI ,

    Deflection = 0=w .

    The value of nL is unknown and is determined using the boundary condition of the beam given. For different boundary conditions we get different equations.

    While the case of simply supported beam admits a closed form solution, the other equation has to

    be solved numerically. All these equations have a number of solutions each corresponding to

    different modes of vibration. The first, second and third positive solutions were determined for

    251

  • each case and the solutions obtained are used to determine the frequencies of vibration for three

    modes.

    1. Free End:

    Frequency Equation: 0sin =ln , Mode Shape: xCw nnn sin= .

    32

    3

    2

    1

    ===

    lll

    2. Simply supported (pinned) end:

    Frequency Equation: 1cos.cos =ll nn

    Mode Shape: ( )

    +

    ++= xx

    xxxxxxCw nn

    nn

    nnnnnn

    coshcoscoscosh

    sinhsinsinhsin

    137165.14995608.10

    853205.7730041.4

    4

    3

    2

    1

    ====

    llll

    We now consider the effect of different masses at different locations. A lower bound

    approximation method Dunkerleys Equation is used to determine the frequency with lumped

    masses attached to the beam.

    The Dunkerleys formulae is given as

    252

  • 2 2 2 21 2

    1 1 1 1 .......

    sys beam

    sys

    beam

    i

    wherefundamental frequency of the total systemfundamental frequency of the beam alone

    fundamental frequency of the ith mass mounted on the beam alone

    = + + +

    ==

    =

    The natural frequency of the mass alone is determined from the static deflection value obtained

    by using the strength of materials theory

    2

    ( )/i i i

    F K xK m

    = =

    Rigorously speaking, all real system are continuous system A continuous system for analysis purpose can be reduces to a finite number of discrete

    models. Each discrete model can be reduced to an eigenvalue problem.

    In can of continuous systems the solution yield infinite number of eignvalus and eigenfunctions where as in discrete system the number of eignvalues and vector are finite.

    The concept of orthogonality is applicable to both discrete and continuous systems. The eigen value problem in case of discrete system takes the from of algebraic equations

    while in continuous systems differential equations and some times integral equations are

    obtained. Eigenvectors of the discrete system becomes eigenfunction of the continuous

    system.

    Geometric boundary conditions (or essential or imposed

    boundary conditions)

    resulting from conditions of purely geometric compatibility

    Ex

    Boundary conditions Here, deflections and slope at

    both ends are zero constitute geometric b.c s

    Natural boundary conditions (additional or dynamic b.cs)

    resulting from the balance of moments or forces.

    253

  • Bending moment is zero at both the ends.

    So in case of a simply supported beam, the natural boundary conditions are bending moment is

    zero at both the ends and in geometric boundary condition is deflections are are zero at both the

    ends. For a cantilever beam, while the fixed end has geometric bcs (deflection and slope zero)

    and free end has natural bcs (shear force and bending moment zero)

    Approximate methods

    In exact method difficulties arises in

    Solving roots of the characteristic equation. Except for very simple boundary conditions, one has to go for numerical solution.

    In determining the normal modes of the system Determination of steady state response

    So quick for determination of the natural frequencies of a system, when a very accurate result is not of much importance one should go for an approximate method.

    Modeling

    .

    Approximation

    Series solution

    Approximate method where approximation error should be within acceptable limits one may

    assume a series solution as

    =

    =

    0)()(),(

    nnn xtftxy (1)

    where ( )n x is the normal modes and ( )nf t is the time function which depends upon initial conditions and forcing function. There are certain difficulties that limit the application of

    classical analysis of continua to a very simple geometries only.

    The infinite series sometimes converge very slowly and it is difficult to estimate how many terms are needed for engineering accuracy.

    The formulation and computation efforts are prohibitive for systems of engineering complexity.

    254

  • The special methods (as approximate methods) treat the continuous systems, for vibration

    analysis purpose, as discrete systems. This can be done with one of the following methods.

    Retaining n natural modes only and considering them as generalized coordinates and computing the n weighing functions fn(t) to best fit the initial conditions or the

    forcing functions.

    Substituting for the n modes an equal number of known functions n(x) that satisfy the geometric conditions of the problem and then compute the functions

    fn(t) to best fit the differential equation, the remaining boundary conditions, and

    the intitial conditions of the forcing functions.

    Taking as generalized coordinates the n physical conditions of a certain number of points of the system q, (q,"qn) considering them as functions of time, and computing them to fit the differential equation; and the initial and boundary

    conditions.

    The main advantage of all theses methods is that instead of dealing with one or more

    partial differential equations, one deals with a larger number of ordinary differential

    equations (usually liner with constant coefficients) which are particularly suitable for

    solution in fast computing machines.

    Rayleighs Method

    (Lord Rayleigh (1842-1919) 1868 fellow of Trinity collage. His first experimental investigation

    was in electricity, but soon he turned to Acoustics & Vibration. He started writing Theory of

    Sound on a boat trip up the Nile in 1872 and the book was published in 1877. 1904-Got Nobel

    Prize in physics.)

    -Rayleigh method gives a fast and rather accurate computation of the fundamental frequency of

    the system.

    -It applies for both discrete and continuous systems.

    Consider a discrete, conservative system describe of by way of Matrix equation

    (2) 0=+ KxMx

    255

  • The equation above is satisfied by a set of n eigenvalues and normalized eigenvectors ,

    which satisfy the equation

    2i i

    i =1, 2----n (3) ii MK 22=Multiplying both sides of (3) by and dividing by a scalar , which is a quadratic form,

    we have

    iT ,iT M

    iiTiiT

    i MK =2 (4)

    If we know the eigenvector , we can obtain the corresponding eigen value by eqi 2i n (4). However in general, we donot know the eigenvectors is advance. Suppose that we consider an

    arbitrary vector Z in eqn(3)

    MzzKzzzR T

    T

    == )(2 (5) where R(z) depends on the vector z and is called Rayleighs quotient . When the vector z

    coincides with an eigenvector , Rayleighs quotient coincides with the corresponding

    eigenvalues.

    i

    From vector algebra it is known that we can express any vector z by a linear combination of then

    linearly independent vectors (expansion theorem):

    (6) =

    ==n

    j

    i ZCcizz1

    )(

    where Z is a square modal matrix [z(1)z(2)] and C = {c1 c2.cn}

    If the vector z(i) have been normalized so that

    ,IMZZ T = then =KZZ T diag (7) Pwww n =]........,[ 22221using (6) in (6) and using orthogonal Property

    256

  • =

    ==== ni

    n

    iT

    T

    TT

    TT

    ICCPCC

    MZCZCKZCZCzR

    1

    2

    1

    22

    )(

    (8)

    Example: Using Rayleigh quotient method, find the fundamental frequency for a cantilever

    beam assuming the approximate function as the static deflection curve.

    x

    Static deflection of a cantilever beam can be found using bending equation as follows.

    2

    2

    2.

    dxydEIxwxM ==

    or, 13

    321 Cwx

    dxdyEI +=

    214

    461 CxCwxEIy ++=

    BCs lx =

    ==

    0

    0

    dxdyy

    31 61 wlC =

    lxxCwxC =

    +=

    1

    4

    2 461

    8624

    44

    4 wlwlwl +=

    =

    257

  • ( )434 3424

    lxlxEI

    wy += (deflection from free end)

    To measure x from fixed end

    One may substitute '( )x l x= in the above equation.

    [ ]4'34' 3)(4)(24

    lxllxlETwy +=

    ( )[ ]32233 43324

    llxxlxlEI

    w += replacing x by x

    [ ]43224322334 333333324

    llxxlxxlxlxllxlEI

    w +++++=

    [ ]2234 6424

    xllxxEI

    w +=

    Taking static deflection curvee ( )2234 6424

    )( xllxxEI

    wx +=

    )12124(24

    )( 223 xllxxEI

    wdx

    xd += w = weight/unit length

    )122412(24

    )( 222

    2

    llxxEI

    wdx

    xd += )2(2

    22 llxxEIw +=

    potential energy dxx

    yEIl

    2

    0

    2

    221

    =

    = lo dxyxmwEK 22 )(21.

    )(24

    )64(21

    )()(2

    .21

    2222

    222234

    14

    02

    IIE

    dxwxllxxm

    IdxlxEIwEI

    wl

    o

    l

    +

    =

    =

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    xyEI

    xtum

    ( ) dttEI

    EIwIo

    l

    41 22

    1 = otlx

    ltxdxdttxt

    ==+==

    ==,0

    ( )20102

    1522

    1 555 wllowtwEo

    l

    ==

    =

    258

  • +++= l dxlxxllxxlxlxEImwI 0 65274462822

    2 )1248423616()24(21

    22726388

    54729

    )24(712

    684

    88

    536

    716

    921

    EIwxlxllxxlxlxm

    l

    o

    +////

    /++=

    22

    999999

    )24(7128

    88

    536

    716

    921

    EIwllllllm

    +/

    /++=

    +++= 2

    29

    )24(71281

    536

    1716

    91

    21

    EIwml

    229

    )24(296657.0

    EIwml =

    5 2

    2 9

    2 (24 )20 0.96657

    l EIm t

    /

    52)(591963.59

    mlEI= Ans

    Uniformly loaded shaft:

    4 2

    4 2 0d y d yEIdx dt

    + = Euler Equation

    General Solution

    cosh sinh cos sin = + + +y a x b x c x d x .(A) 2

    4

    2 24( )

    =

    = =n n nEI

    EI ElPL

    I

    n depends on the bcs

    259

  • Beam Conf 21( ) fundamentall 22( ) second model 23( ) thirdmodel

    Simply supported 9.87 39.5 88.9

    Cantilever 3.52 22.0 61.7

    Free-free 22.4 61.7 121.0

    Clamped-clamped 22.4 61.7 121.0

    Clamped-hinged 15.4 50.0 104.0

    Hinged-free 0 50.0 4 2

    4 2 0 + =d md y

    dx EIdt

    ( ), ( ) = y x g t 4 2

    4 2( ) . 0+ =d y my d gg tdx EI dt

    or, 4 2

    4 2 ( ) ( = =

    d y my d g g t consdx EI dt

    4 2

    4 0=> =d y my

    dx EI

    4

    44 0 =d y ydx Roots i ,

    For simply supported

    Bcs y = 0, x = 0 & L

    BM = 0 2

    2=> d ydx at x = 0 & L y = 0 eqn. (A)

    at x = 0 y = 0 = a + c, =>2

    2

    d ydl

    = a c = 0

    sinh sin => = +y b x d x

    15.4 2)t

    => a = c =0

    260

  • x = l, y = 0 sinh sin 0 => + =b l d l sinh 0 as sinh 0 => =b l l , b=02

    2 0 sinh sin = => =d y b l d ldx 0

    Also, sin 0 =d l As 0, sin 0d =l if (d = 0, y = 0, leads to trivial) sin 0 = l Frequency Equation

    sin sin => =l n , n = 1,2,3 => =l n , n = 1,2,3 0 l

    For n = 1, first mode =l 2 2

    4( ) =nEInL

    44 => =n

    EInL

    for simply supported beam carrying has maximum deflection at midpoint. 35

    384 = WL

    EI W = total weight

    45 / 384= gL EI

    Hence, 2 2 2 5 384

    = ngn 4

    5384 =

    EI gL

    For Cantilever Beam 4

    =384 gl

    EI

    Shaft carrying several loads:

    Dunkerleys Method (Semi empirical) approximate solution

    According to Dunkerleys empirical formula

    261

  • 1 2

    2 2 2

    1 1 1 1.......... 2 = + + +sn n n n

    1 2

    2 2 2

    1 1 1 1..........= + + + 2sn n n n

    f f f f

    Dunkerleys lowerbound approximation.

    Let W1, W2,.Wn be the concentrated loa sses m1, m2, . mn and 1, 2, 3 are the static deflections of the s n the load acts alone as shaft. Also let the shaft carry a uniformly di it length over its whole

    span and static deflection at the mid span du

    Let

    n = Frequency of tranverse vibration of thens = Frequency with distributed load actingn1, n2...... = Frequency of tranverse vibrati

    Energy Method (Rayleighs upper bound

    Max P.E.(Extreme Position)=Max K.E (Me

    1 1 2 2 3 31 1 1 ....2 2 2

    = + + +W Y W Y W Y

    ds on the sharft due to ma

    haft under each load. Whe

    stributed mass of m per une to the load of this mass be s. Also

    whole system.

    alone

    on when each of W1, W2,W3. act alone.

    approximation):

    an Position)

    262

    Neglects mass of the beam difficult to apply in the presence of many masses.

  • Max P.E. 1 1 1 1( ......)2= + +g m y m y

    2= g my Max K.E. 2 2 21 1 2 2 3 3

    1 1 1 ......2 2 2

    = + + +m v m v m v

    2 2 21 1 2 2 3 3

    1 1 1( ) ( ) ( ) ......2 2 2

    = + +m y m y m y +

    2 212= my

    2 212 2

    => = g my my 2

    2=> = ng my

    my

    Unlike Dunker leys formula, which is valid for lateral vibration of shafts only, Rayleighs

    method is valid for a system performing oscillatory motion in any manner i.e., bending, torsional

    or longitudinal motions.

    Example:

    Consider a shaft carrying three discs as shown in the figure. The influence coeffiecients are,

    3

    113

    256= la

    EI,

    3

    22 48= la

    EI,

    3

    333

    256= la

    EI

    263

  • Influence Coefficients: ija deflection at station i due to

    unit load at station j

    Using Dunkerleys formula 3

    21

    1 3256 =

    mlEI

    , 3

    22

    1 248 =

    mlEI

    , 3

    23

    1 3256 =

    mlEI

    3 3

    2

    1 3 2 3256 48 256 = + +n

    ml ml mlEI EI EI

    3

    2

    3

    3

    15.36 Dunkerly

    16.199EI = Exact

    nEIml

    ml

    = 3(3+10.66+3)ml=

    256EI

    23 3

    256 15.3616.66

    = =n EI Eml mlI

    33.9191 =n EIml

    Rayleigh method: Flexibility influence coefficient displacement at i due to unit load at j with all other forces equal to zero.

    3

    119

    768= la

    EI,

    3

    1211

    768= la ,

    EI

    3

    137

    768= la

    EI

    3

    2216

    768= la

    EI,

    3

    2311

    768= la ,

    EI

    3

    339

    768= la

    EI

    By Maxwells reciprocal theorem the remaining influence coefficients can easily be determined.

    The static deflections are therefore given by,

    1 1 11 2 12 3 13= + +X m ga m ga m ga 2 1 21 2 22 3= + + 23X m ga m ga m ga 3 1 31 2 32 3 33= + +X m ga m ga m ga 1 3 2 and 2= = =m m m m m

    3

    138768

    = ml gXEI

    , 3

    254768

    = ml gXEI

    , 3

    338768

    = ml gXEI

    264

  • 2 1

    1

    =

    =

    => =

    n

    i ii

    n n

    i ii

    g m X

    m X3

    16.2055EI=ml

    ( which is slightly higher than the exact value 3EI16.199ml

    )

    Example:

    A steam turbine blade of length l, can be considered as a uniform cantilever beam, mass

    m per unit length with a tip mass M. The flexural rigidity of the blades is EI. Determine

    fundamental bending frequency.(Use Rayleigh Method)

    23 3

    .256 2563 3

    n

    n

    g

    g g EI EImgl mgl

    = => = = =

    Sol:

    Assuming Y(x,t)=Y(x)cos t xY(x)=A(1-cos )

    2l

    xY( , ) Y(x)sin t=- A(1-cos )sin2l = x t t

    2

    0

    1. .2

    = = lK E T m y dx 2 2

    0

    1 (1 cos )2 2

    = l xm Al 2dx 2 2

    2

    0

    (1 cos )2 2 = lmA x dxl

    2 2

    02

    2 =

    lmA x

    2 2

    00

    00

    2sin sin 2( )2 22 2 2( )

    2 2

    +

    l l

    ll

    x xmA xl lx

    l

    2 2 3 2 .2(1 0) (0 0)2 2

    =

    mA l ll

    265

  • 2 22 23 4 3 2( )

    2 2 4

    = = mA ll mA l

    The K.E. of tipmass { }2 2 21 1 1= ( ( ))2 2 2

    = =M y l M A M A

    The K.E. of the system = 2 2 2 23 2 1 mA4 2

    + l M A

    22 42

    2 30

    1P.E. V=2 6

    = l d y EI

    4EI dx

    dx lA

    Strain Energy

    Equating max P.E. with max K.E.,

    23

    3.0382( 0.232 )

    EIM ml l

    = +

    Exercise Problems

    1. A shaft 40 mm diameter and 2.5 m long has a mass of 15 kg per m length. It is fixed at

    both the ends and carries three masses 90 kg, 140 kg and 60 kg at 0.8 m, 1.5 m and 2 m

    respectively from the left support. Taking E = 200 GN/m2, find the frequency of the

    transverse vibrations. (Hinds: 1 L = 4.730). 2. A rotor has a mass of 12 kg and is mounted midway on a 24 mm diameter horizontal

    shaft supported at the ends by two bearings. The mass of the shaft is 2 kg and bearings

    are 1 m apart. The shaft rotates at 2400 rpm. If the center of mass of the rotor is 0.1 mm

    away from the geometric center of the rotor due to a certain manufacturing defect, find

    the amplitude of steady state vibration and the dynamic force transmitted to the bearing.

    Take = 0.01 and E = 200 GN/ m . 23. A rotor has a mass of 15 kg and is mounted midway on a 24 mm diameter horizontal

    shaft supported at the ends by two bearings. The mass of the shaft is 2 kg and bearings

    are 1 m apart. Find the first two natural frequency using energy principle. E = 200 GN/

    m . 2

    266

    CHAPTER 14 TRANSVERSE VIBRATION OF EULER BEAMApproximate methods

    Rayleighs MethodStatic deflection of a cantilever beam can be found using beUniformly loaded shaft:General Solution

    Dunkerleys Method (Semi empirical) approximate solutionUsing Dunkerleys formulaExercise Problems