transportation day at the capitol jon chiglo, director of engineering services minnesota department...

28
Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Upload: luis-diaz

Post on 26-Mar-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Transportation Day at the Capitol

Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering ServicesMinnesota Department of Transportation

February 23, 2012

Page 2: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

MnDOT Strategic Vision

Global leader in transportation committed to upholding public needs and collaboration with internal and external

partners to create a safe, efficient and sustainable transportation system for the future.

Page 3: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Performance Management

Page 4: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Minnesota GO - 50 Year Vision

Minnesota’s multimodal transportation system maximizes the health of people, the environment and our

economy.

Page 5: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

50-year Vision for Transportation

Page 6: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Minnesota GO – Guiding Principles• Leverage public

investments to achieve multiple purposes

• Ensure accessibility• Build to a maintainable

scale• Ensure regional

connections

• Integrate safety• Emphasize reliable

and predictable options

• Strategically fix the system

• Use partnerships

Page 7: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

The Vision Will Lead Directly Into the next 20-year Statewide Multimodal Transportation Plan

Minnesota GO - 50 Year Vision

For more information: http://www.minnesotagoplan.org

Page 8: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Quality of Life (QOL)

Page 9: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

11 Identified Quality of Life Categories

• Education• Employment/ finances• Environment• Housing• Family, friends &

neighbors• Health

• Local amenities• Recreation &

entertainment• Safety & Security• Spirituality & individual

psychic (serenity)• Transportation

Page 10: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Relationship Among 11 QOL Areas

Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4

Education Health Local services/ amenities

Spirituality, faith & serenity

Environment Family/friends Recreation

Employment Safety/security

Housing

Transportation

Page 11: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Seven Transportation Areas

• Access• Design• Environment• Maintenance• Mobility• Safety• Transparency (planning &

communications)

Page 12: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

8 out of 10 Minnesotans’ Satisfied with MnDOT Services

Page 13: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Maintenance .27

7 of 8 Areas Significant Predictors of Satisfaction with MnDOT Services

Page 14: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Four areas identified as ‘good work’

Opportunity to focus in

maintenance area [smoothness

of roads]

Page 15: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Workforce Products and Services

Quality of Life Indicators

Performance Measures

Market Research

Page 16: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

MnDOT defines risk as the effects of uncertainty on objectives; or anything that could be an obstacle to achieving goals and objectives.

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is an analytic and management process that ensures a focus on identifying, assessing and responding to the inherent uncertainties of managing an organization and its assets.

Enterprise Risk Management

Page 17: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

– Risk Assessment

– Market Research

– Performance Management– Quality of Life

Enterprise Risk Management Results in Integrated:

Page 18: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012
Page 19: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

• Focus on performance and outcomes that enhance Minnesota’s quality of life

• Use risk-based investments to provide the greatest transportation benefit with the funds available

• Deliver a transportation system for the future that is flexible and maintainable in scale, not weighed down with an excessive unfunded burden for maintenance and operations

Risk-Based Highway Investment Strategy

Page 20: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

• Previous 20-Year Plan identified a $50 billion additional investment needed, above and beyond the available $15 billion

• Minnesota cannot, realistically, expect to fill this entire $50 billion gap

• Instead, the new strategy identifies almost $8.9 billion in risk-based (priority) additional investments over the next 20 years

• This is roughly equivalent to a $0.24 increase or doubling of the state motor fuels tax

The Needs Gap

Page 21: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Performance Management

Page 22: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

• The standard planning method generates a $50 billion gap of unconstrained needs

• The adjusted risk based approach shows an $8.9 billion gap of high priority needs

Risk-Based Investment Strategy

Page 23: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

• Safetyo Toward Zero Deathso Rural Intersection Safety Technologies

• Infrastructure preservationo Better Roads for a Better Minnesota

• Urban mobilityo MnPASS

• Economic developmento Transportation Economic Development (TED) Program

Priority Investment Areas

Page 24: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Innovative Solutions = Same Benefits, Lower Costs

Need *Standard Solution New Solution

Rush Hour Congestion

Example: I-35W MnPASS “HOT” lanes between Burnsville and Minneapolis

Add more general purpose lanes [Disadvantages: unused capacity in off peak hours and on weekends, may require expensive and disruptive property acquisitions]

Add MnPASS transit/toll lanes [Advantages: moves more people at lower cost, attractive express bus transit option]

Freeway Mobility

Example: Hwy 169/494 interchange in Eden Prairie

Full eight-way interchange [Disadvantages: high cost, meets 100 percent of the need, may provide costly service to low-volume traffic movement]

Modified six-way interchange [Advantages: can achieve 90 percent of the need while saving millions of dollars]

Safety

Example: Cable median barrier

Concrete or steel barrier, or no barrier. [Disadvantages: concrete and steel are costly, cause more damage. No barrier means cross median crashes can occur.]

Cable median barrier [Advantages: More cost effective to install. Easier to repair and replace. Can put more up, which reduces incidence of cross-median crashes.]

Page 25: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

Corridor Investment Management Strategy (CIMS)

• Strategy to address collaboration opportunities on corridors– Design: Incorporate local input into MnDOT project design– Prioritize: Time MnDOT projects to coincide with

development opportunities and local partner construction schedules

– Partner: Plan joint projects with local partners– Prepare: Identify and develop candidate projects for potential

discretionary funding

Page 26: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

CIMS Approach

• Focus on next 4-10 years with clear linkage to the vision of sustainable solutions

• Essential improvements needed at any funding level• Not a static plan, but dynamic needs assessment• Periodic updates as context changes• Share information, rationale behind desired projects• Seek alternative, cost effective approaches to achieve

desired outcomes• Identify priorities for potential competitive funding

Page 27: Transportation Day at the Capitol Jon Chiglo, Director of Engineering Services Minnesota Department of Transportation February 23, 2012

MnDOT is on a journey!