transportation (55-00-00)
TRANSCRIPT
Transportation(55-00-00)
Project Summary Chart
STATE CAPITAL FUNDS
Project Name$ Prior toFY 2001 FY 2001
FY 2002Request
FY 2002Recommended
FY 2003Request
FY 2004Request
1. Program Development $ 3,000,000 $ 3,350,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000
2. System Preservation 65,542,000* 73,885,000 59,839,000 59,839,000 58,803,000 55,238,000
3. System Management 32,695,000* 39,452,000 49,749,000 49,749,000 44,735,000 41,771,000
4. System Expansion 39,454,000* 104,937,000 33,216,000 33,216,000 25,852,000 9,675,000
5. Engineering &Contingencies
7,680,000* 7,828,000 6,136,000 6,136,000 4,872,000 5,343,000
6. Suburban Street &Drainage
18,550,000* 18,550,000 18,550,000 18,550,000 18,550,000 18,550,000
7. Municipal Street Aid 6,000,000* 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000
8. Reserve Account 1,660,000 3,852,000 4,650,000 4,650,000
Total $ 174,581,000 $ 257,854,000 $ 181,140,000 $ 181,140,000 $ 161,812,000 $ 139,577,000
*Due to the on-going basis of these appropriations, only the FY 2000 appropriation is reflected.
TRANSPORTATION55-00-00
1. Program Development (74/00) $3,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
Funding is requested to continue to develop efforts to identify and definetransportation needs and develop transportation solutions to meet those needs. Thisincludes area studies, travel demand modeling, feasibility studies, alternate modeand alternate analysis, and location and environmental studies.
For Fiscal Year 2002, funding is requested for corridor improvement studies in andaround the following areas:
- Camden, Harrington and Laurel truck routes;
- Wilmington Studies;
- Southern New Castle County Rural Roads and Completion of US 301
- Sussex County Corridor Routes
- Central Pencader Rural Roads, New Castle County
- SR 41, Lancaster Pike, Yorklyn to Valley Road, Hockessin
- SR 71 and Howell School Road
- Choptank and Carter Roads
2. System Preservation (75/00) $59,839,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
Funding is requested to replace heavy equipment and vehicles; bridgerepair/replacement; pavement resurfacing; rehabilitation of existing DelDOTsupport facilities; and other major maintenance or reconstruction activities tomaintain the existing transportation network in a good state of repair. Among themost significant projects are:
- Continuing to rehabilitate bridges at a rate of 20 per year
- Continuing the enhanced paving and paving rehabilitation programs begunin Fiscal Year 1998 to support reaching the Department’s goal of 85%pavements rated good/excellent by the end of CY 2001.
- Conversion of tar and chip roads to hard surface roads in Kent and Sussexcounties.
- Purchase of replacement transit vehicles
- Acquire replacement equipment in Highway Operations sufficient to bringthe overall economic age to 6.0 years by the end of Fiscal Year 2002
TRANSPORTATION55-00-00
3. System Management (76/00) $49,749,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
Funding is requested for infrastructure investments including adding turn andacceleration and deceleration lanes; making safety improvements to intersectionsand travelways in response to actual accident histories or the identification ofhazards; improved commuter services along existing corridors or transit routessuch as park and ride lots; corridor preservation purchases to preclude erosion ofexisting roadway capacities; installing traffic control devices; pedestrian/bikeways;retrofitting existing travelways to meet revised or minimum standards ofconstruction, functionality, or safety; Transportation Enhancements program(program funded as a condition of federal aid through TEA-21) to address non-traditional transportation improvements; and major technology enhancements suchas vehicle video security, ticket vending machines, voice bus stop announcementsystems; variable message signs, and global positioning signs. For Fiscal year2002, recommended projects include:
- the fourth year of dedicated funding for Intelligent TransportationManagement System (ITMS) components, adaptive and “smart”communications systems along selected corridors statewide; trafficmanagement; radio communication improvements for DelDOT vehicles;
- Continued support for Churchman’s Crossing improvements withconstruction of multi-modal improvements including sidewalks, bikepaths, transit, ITMS components and greenway improvements;
- US 40 corridor improvements including construction of multi-modalimprovements including Church Road and begin design and right of wayacquisitions for improvements for the for the completion of Phase I asdecided by consensus of US 40 Corridor working group;
- Corridor preservation advanced acquisition of rights of way for US 13,US 113, SR 48, SR 1, (South of Dover and US 301;
- Construction of the Wilmington Transit Center from Market Street toWalnut Street, Browntown pedestrian walkways and the last phase of theWilmington Riverwalk at the Peterson Wildlife Preserve;
- Continue support for SR 1 grid improvements
- Construction of intersection improvements at the SR 24 and SR 5 area atLong Neck
TRANSPORTATION55-00-00
4. System Expansion (77/00) $33,216,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
Funding is requested to continue projects that increase capacity to the existingtransportation network according to the growth strategies outlined in the LongRange Plan for Transportation. Projects include rolling stock (and relatedparts/equipment/facilities) to support new or expanded transit services; increasedcapacity within highway corridors, including new travel lanes along an existingcorridor or new roads/bridges along a completely new corridor; new or expandedintermodal terminals, centers or facilities; and new facilities for multimodal centers.For Fiscal Year 2002, recommended projects include:
- Construction of a new bridge on Churchman’s Road over I-95;
- Right of way acquisition for SR 141 improvements over the Brandywine;
- Port of Wilmington infrastructure improvements;
- Begin design improvements on SR 1 at Thompsonville in Kent County;
- Begin design and property acquisition for interchange at SR 1 and SR 16in Sussex County;
- Begin the second year of the Wilmington Transit Connector/Trolley inpreparation of planned construction completion and operation inCY 2004.
5. Engineering and Contingencies (57/00) $ 6,136,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
Funding is requested to serve a number of general purposes: 1) providing the statematch for the federal highway planning and research; 2) contingency for project-related expenses that cannot be absorbed within project accounts and projectcontingencies; 3) contractor claims; and 4) continuation of department-wide effort tomigrate from the current mainframe based information system to a client-serverbased information system.
6. Suburban Streets and Drainage (56/00) $18,550,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
Funding is for the General Assembly to improve the approximately 1,000 miles ofsuburban streets and other miscellaneous improvements.
TRANSPORTATION55-00-00
7. Municipal Street Aid (71/00) $ 6,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
Funding is requested to aid municipalities for the cost of roadway maintenance.This includes drainage; reconstruction, rehabilitation and repaving of streets;or other transportation related expenses for which they bear full maintenanceresponsibility. The funding level for each municipality is based on populationand the amount of road miles each municipality maintains.
8. Reserve Account (71/00) $ 4,650,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
Funding is requested for bond issuance costs and necessary reserves.
TRANSPORTATION55-00-00
Title Activity FundTotalCost
State$ Auth.
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTTTF Authorization Needed 3,000FHWA Authorization 3,480FTA Authorization 319
SYSTEM PRESERVATIONBridge Preservation Program Co St/Fed 7,704 2,851BR 1 on Rising Sun Road over Brandywine Creek R/W State 25 25BR 1B on Kennett Pike over Railroad Co St/Fed 790 18BR 9 on N221 over Brandywine Creek Co St/Fed 1,400 138BR 26 on Foulk Road over Naaman's Creek Co St/Fed 367 90BR 66 on Breck's Lane Co St/Fed 0 13BR 89 on Snuff Mill Road Co St/Fed 300 60BR 91 on Snuff Mill Road R/W, Co St/Fed 310 70BR120 on SR 82 over Red Clay Creek Co St/Fed 1,120 18BR137A on K137 over Duck Creek, Clayton R/W State 17 17BR156A on K156 over Fork Branch Co St/Fed 200 40BR174 on Hillside Road Co St/Fed 600 89BR182 on Faulkland Road over Hyde Creek R/W, Co St/Fed 315 75BR210 on K208 over Shades Branch, South of Marydel R/W, Co St/Fed 703 147BR229B on Kirkwood Highway over White Clay Creek Co St/Fed 909 189BR237 on S 46 over Gravelly Branch, Seaford R/W, Co St/Fed 1,062 248BR245 on Harmony Road over Amtrak Co State 720 -BR348A, on Postles Corner Road Co State 300 202BR350 on S 72 over Raccoon Spillway, Laurel R/W, Co St/Fed 890 191BR358W on Pulaski Highway over Belltown Run Co State 550 482BR365 on US 13 over Records Pond, East of Laurel R/W, Co St/Fed 1,108 222BR407A at Silver Lake Co State 300 300BR447 on S 54 over Black Water Ditch, East of Dagsboro Co St/Fed 400 80BR474 on Delaney's Road over Paw Branch R/W, Co St/Fed 232 59BR526 and 527 on S326 at Betts Pond Co State 1,200 572BR586 on SR 265 over Pokemoke River, North of Gumboro Co State 344 344BR636 on Kirkwood Highway and BR253 on Old Capital Trail R/W, Co St/Fed 750 190BR688 on South Market Street over Christina River PE State 200 200BR712B on I-95 at Service Area, Newark Co St/Fed 400 40BR815N on SR 1 NB over Waples Pond R/W, Co St/Fed 1,036 215Environmental Improvements State 1,210 1,210Equipment Replacement PRO State 6,960 6,960Grubb Road Drainage, Naaman's Road to Foulk Road Co St/Fed 2,050 410I-95, Wilmington Viaduct to US202 PE/R/W/C St/Fed 11,250 1,970Materials & Minor Contracts State 1,096 1,096Operations Facility Improvements Co State 691 691Other System Preservation Projects Co St/Fed 1,500 700Pavement Rehabilitation PE/Co St/Fed 16,290 5,178Pavement Resurfacings Co State 24,000 24,000Rail Preservation State 2,039 2,039Slope Stabilization, SR 82 from Old Public Rd to Yorklyn Rd, Co St/Fed 1,480 163SR141, North of US 13 from Delaware Ave. to Jay Drive R/W State 455 455Transit Facilities Improvements State 395 395Transit Vehicle Replacement PRO St/Fed 5,350 2,014US113, MD State Line to North of Dagsboro Co St/Fed 15,614 5,374
TRANSPORTATION55-00-00
Title Activity FundTotalCost
State$ Auth.
TTF Authorization Needed 59,840Reprogramming -FHWA Authorization 50,510FHWA Advanced Construction Payback 7,900FHWA Discretionary 4,400FTA Authorization 2,962FTA Advanced Construction Payback -FTA Discretionary -Other $ -
SYSTEM MANAGEMENTBrackenville Road, SR 48 to Barley Mill Road PE/R/W State 800 800Camden / Wyoming Truck Route Railroad Improvements PE State 72 -Choptank Road, N 15 top N455 PE State 700 440Churchman's Crossing Corridor Improvements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 9,622 4,966Corridor Preservation and Advanced R/W Acquisition R/W State 5,100 5,100Governor's Avenue, Webb's Lane to Water Street PE State 400 400Integrated Transportation Management System PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 5,300 1,060Intermodal/Multimodal Transportation Improvements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 5,278 4,158Intersection Improvements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 625 225Loockerman Street, Queen Street to State Street PE State 42 42Milton Truck Route from SR 5 to SR 30 LOC/PE State 282 282Other System Management Projects to be identified PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 2,600 514Rail Crossing Safety Co St/Fed 725 163S298 and S299 rehabilitation and safety improvements LOC/PE State 50 50Safety Improvements - HSIP Program PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 1,889 189Southern New Castle County roadway improvements PE/R/W/Co State 1,400 -SR 1, Corridor Improvements, Kent County PE State 150 129SR 1, Corridor Improvements, Sussex County PE St/Fed 263 -SR 1, Dewey Beach Improvements from Salisbury Street to R/W State 985 985SR 1, Grid Improvements, Rehoboth Avenue to 5 Points PE State 900 -SR 24 and SR 5, Long Neck, Intersection improvements Co St/Fed 1,466 331SR 26, Assawoman Canal to US113 PE/R/W/Co State 1,450 1,450SR 41, Yorklyn Road to Valley Road PE State 485 360SR896 and SR 4 Intersection improvements PE State 32 32Sussex East/West Corridor route improvements PE/R/W/Co State 3,000 3,000Traffic Calming Program PE/R/W/Co State 400 400Transit Access - Passenger Facilities PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 1,069 829Transit Bus Equipment PE/R/W/Co State 395 395Transportation Enhancements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 4,000 800US 40 Corridor Improvements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 12,565 8,751Walker Road, Kenton Road to Saulsbury Road R/W State 800 800Wilmington Riverfront PE/R/W/Co State 13,105Wilmington Traffic Calming PE/R/W/Co 3,576 193
TTF Authorization Needed 79,526Reprogramming -FHWA AuthorizationFHWA Advanced Construction Payback -FHWA Discretionary -FTA Authorization 59FTA Advanced Construction Payback -FTA Discretionary -Other $ 540
TRANSPORTATION55-00-00
Title Activity FundTotalCost
State$ Auth.
SYSTEM EXPANSION
Churchman's Crossing Transit Facilities - Intermodal Rail Co State 6,454 6,454Churchman's Crossing Corridor / Bridge PE/Co St/Fed 70 70Corridor Capacity Improvements - Sussex County PE State 165 165Port of Wilmington State 15,000 15,000Other System Expansion projects to be identified PE/R/W/Co State 3,124 1,524SR 1 / SR 16 Interchange PE/R/W St/Fed 1,510 742SR 1 / Thompsonville Interchange PE St/Fed 1,000 200SR 1, Grid Improvements, SB 3rd Lane, SR 24 to 5 Points ENV/PE State 1,424 540SR 1, South of Dover to C&D Canal PE/Co St/Fed 2,720 591SR141 / US202, Area Wide Improvements PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 24,541 -SR141, Kennett Pike to US202, Tyler McConnell Bridge PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 8,000 4,166Transit Facilities - Statewide PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 365Transit Vehicle Expansion PRO St/Fed 6,238 2,979Wilmington Transit Connector PE/R/W/Co St/Fed 6,010 420
TTF Authorization Needed 77,621 33,216Reprogramming -FHWA Authorization 11,498FHWA Advanced Construction Payback 24,905FHWA DiscretionaryFTA Authorization 203FTA Advanced Construction Payback -FTA Discretionary 6,864Other $ 784
ENGINEERING AND CONTINGENCIES 6,136
SUBURBAN STREETS 18,550
MUNICIPAL STREET AID 6,000
NEW PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION NEEDED
RESERVE ACCOUNT 4,650
TOTAL NEW CAPITAL (TTF) AUTHORIZATION
ALL $ X 1,000
ABBREVIATIONS NOTE:Co (Construction)PRO (Procurement)ENV (Environment)PE (Preliminary Engineering)R/W (Right – of – Way)TR (Traffic)
BRIDGE PRESERVATION PROGRAM
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Bridges that are identified through the bridge management system for replacement or rehabilitation are addressed through thisprogram. Program elements include repair/replacement of structurally deficient bridges; bridge painting; bridge scour; the bridge inspection program; bridge deck preservation;and underwater bridge repairs. The program is sized to permit 120 structurally deficient bridges to be reconstructed/rehabilitated over the six-year period. As individual bridgeprojects are identified, they are listed as separate projects in the CIP and funds deducted from this program.
The sign inspection program will inventory and inspect all state-owned sign structures, high mast lighting, and traffic signal supports. During the initial inventory inspection ofthe structures, an inspection interval will be assigned based on the structure’s condition, not to exceed five (5) years. Based on these intervals, schedules to perform theinspections will be developed. The goal of the program is to inventory all of the structures within five (5) years, maintaining a 95% on-time rate based on these schedules.Funding to address deficiencies identified through the inspection plan is provided within materials and Minor Contracts.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge priority rating system is based on deficiency ratings, which are updated annually to target specific bridges forrepair/rehabilitation/construction.
County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
INDIVIDUAL EST. COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 2,851 5,125 6,381 15,942STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT 80% FHWA 74,581 1,862 6,719 16,000 48,000
100% ST 6,602 2,764 838 1,700 1,50080%FHWA 4,500 4,500
DESIGN FOR NEW BRIDGES 100% ST 5,266 966 1,300 1,500 1,50080% FHWA 4,500 4,500
PAINTING 100% ST 574 57480% FHWA 14,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,000
SIGN STRUCTURE PROGRAM 80% FHWA 4,228 604 604 604 604 1,812
SCOUR 100% ST 249 24980% FHWA 1,800 300 300 300 900
INSPECTION & MGT 80% FHWA 5,875 1,875 2,000 2,000
DECK PRESERVATION 100% ST 4,900 700 700 700 700 2,100
UNDERWATER REPAIR 100% ST 629 29 100 100 100 300
All $ X 1,000
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:
1. Wetland mitigation monitoring requirements typically include 20-year site management/assessment to assure successful creation of wetland resources created as impactcompensation for various capitol projects. Monitoring typically requires monthly hydraulic data collection, fall site sampling for vegetation assessment, annual reports forfive years and then summary reports at the 10, 15,and 20 year marks. The funding estimate also includes a contingency for site remediation that may include: additionalfertilization, seeding, planting, and site re-grading as necessary to assure the establishment of a viable wetland plant and hydrologic characteristics.
2. Specific mitigation projects now underway include:• SR 1 Dover - Smyrna, nine individual sites, 324 acres,
seeding/monitoring• Ogletown mitigation, three sites, 18 acres, final planting, monitoring• First State Boulevard, one site, 2.5 acres, monitoring/fertilization• US113 Georgetown to Milford, one site 100 acres, monitoring
• SR 1 northern segments seven sites 160 acres, monitoring• Scarborough Road, one site six acres, monitoring• Porter Road, one site, 12 acres, monitoring• SR 48, one site, 1.6 acres, monitoring• Naamans Road, five sites, one acre, monitoring
3. A contingency for environmental remediation is also provided to permit unforeseen environmental problems to be addressed as they are identified.
4. Archeological data analyses and report preparation time frames frequently extend beyond completion of the capital project for which the archeological compliance wasmandated. This project element provides for: data analysis, report preparation, publication, and a contingency for follow through with human remains notification andreburials associated with this requirement. Current specific archeological elements include:
• Ogletown Interchange• US113 Georgetown to Milford, data analysis report
• SR 1 southern segments - Scarborough Road• Porter Road
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Permits DelDOT to comply with environmental and cultural laws and regulations as projects are implemented.
County: StatewideProgram Category: System Preservation
INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT EST COST TO FUNDING 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,210 1,210 1,200 7,300
Environmental Improvements 4,800 100% ST 800 800 800 2,400SR141 at Newport 4,000 100% ST 4,000UST Cleanup/Future Replacements 1,100 100% ST 500 100 100 100 300Wetland Mitigation, 1,420 100% ST 800 160 160 150 150Archeology 1,150 100$ ST 250 150 150 150 450
All $ X 1,000
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Systematic equipment replacement program for long life light and heavy equipment used by the department to carry out maintenanceand construction jobs. Graders, front-end loaders, rollers, dump trucks, street sweepers, four wheel drive vehicles, pickup trucks and sewer flushers are typical pieces ofequipment.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: As time passes, the maintenance costs for capital assets tend to rise. And, as these assets near the end of their useful lives, these maintenancecosts can become prohibitive. This reality has given rise to the concept of economic life, or the age beyond which it is more economical to replace an asset than it is tocontinue to try and maintain it. A common management practice in private industry the department applies this simple concept to the management of its equipmentreplacement program. In doing so it has established economic life benchmarks for each and every equipment class in its over 2,100 item major equipment inventory andschedules replacements accordingly. If the department does this on a routine basis, it should be managing an inventory that – taken as a whole – has a composite average agewhich is equal to composite average economical half-life of its entire inventory. At the end of FY 1999, as a result of years of under-investment, the actual average age of theequipment inventory was 9.0 years versus a target half-life target of 4.6 years. To correct this imbalance the department, in FY 2000, began a phased program to bring theactual half-life to target by the end of FY 2003. The interim age targets as the department moves forward are shown below:
Fiscal Year Average AgeGoal
Average AgeActual
1993 N/A 11.5 years1999 N/A 9.5 years2000 8.0 goal 8.0 years2001 7.5 goal2002 6.0 goal2003 4.6 goal
County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT EST COST TO FUNDING 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 6,960 8,117 6,073 18,219
Highway Equipment Replacement Program 37,736 100% ST 656 6,715 6,073 6,073 18,219Equipment for NPDES 245 100% ST 245Equipment for new SR 1 Section 2,044 100% ST 2,044
All $ X 1,000
MATERIALS AND MINOR CONTRACTS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE PRESERVATION
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This request expands the capability of the operating districts to maintain the State’s roadways through the development of unit pricecontracts for small to medium projects. Examples of capital repairs and minor improvements that would be funded by this program include: contracts for adding minor turnlanes at intersections; concrete pavement repairs; repair/replacement of curbs; gutters and sidewalks; traffic control devices (including those necessary for pedestrian, transitand bicycle access); rotomilling; crossover modifications; guardrail installations; and drainage improvements. Annual unit price contracts are issued for various types of workso when specific needs are identified they can be addressed quickly. These are projects and programs which require no acquisition of right of way; minimal design; no locationand/or environmental studies or permits; and are administered by the maintenance districts. As standalone projects are identified, they will be listed as separate projects in theCIP and funds will be deducted from this program.
$100,000 per year is authorized for sign structure, high mast lighting, and traffic signal support replacement identified as necessary by the Sign Structure Inspection Program.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Funding is provided to address minor capital problems throughout the year at the maintenance district level.
County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007FUNDING INDIVIDUAL COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
PROJECT IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJSEGMENTS TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 1,096 708 715 1,750100% ST Materials & Minor Contracts 2,410 160 450 450 450 900100% ST NPDES 1,418 395 150 158 165 550100% ST Traffic Structure Replacement 700 100 100 100 100 300
100% ST Drainage ProgramBowers Beach Improvements - North 255 255Saulsbury Road 220 220Greenspring Road and VanDyke Road 176 176
All $ X 1,000
OPERATIONS FACILITIES
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND COST ESTIMATES
INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 691 0 0 0DelDOT Main Headquarters
Administration Building/ Laboratory 100% ST 9,565 9,565Replace/Upgrade testing equipment 100% ST 30 30
North DirstrictSalt Storage 100% ST 100 100Kiamensi yard improvements 100% ST 621 291 330Kiamensi privacy barrier 100% ST 50 50Talley – Storage facility 100% ST 75 75Tybouts Corner – Salt storage facility 100% ST 50 50Tybouts Corner – Area office building 100% ST 200 200Finish equipment sheds and site planrequirements
100% ST 90 90
Bear, Talley & Kiamensi Bulk Oil system 100% ST 70
ExpresswaysChapman Road – Equipment for trucks 100% ST 269 269I-95 Toll Admin facility – Security fates andbarrier
100% ST 75 75
I-95 Toll Admin. Facility – New water systems 100% ST 135 135
Central DistrictHarrington – Salt/Sand storage structure 100% ST 135 135Middletown & Magnolia security fence 100% ST 51 51Central District – Electrical Upgrades 100% ST 64 64Magnolia – Salt/Storage Structure 100% ST 35 35
South DistrictSeaford Security fencelity – New water System 100% ST 100 100
All $ X 1,000
OTHER SYSTEM PRESERVATION PROJECTS TO BE IDENTIFIED
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Funds have been allocated in this program for those projects yet to be identified that maintain the existing transportation infrastructure.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Funds are available for additional preservation projects which may be identified through the management systems of the Department duringthe course of any particular year.
County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 700 4,364 2,700 3,73580% FHWA 6,850 1,000 1,850 1,000 3,000
100% ST 13,605 3,476 500 3,994 2,500 3,135
All $ X 1,000
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: $12 million is set aside annually. As specific project scopes are developed, funds within this allocation are programmed accordingly.The roadways that are currently scheduled for major pavement rehabilitations are listed below.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To improve deteriorating poor pavement conditions throughout the State.
County: StatewideProgram Category: System Preservation
FMB ID INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR PROJECT FUNDING EST COST TO PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
PROJ # SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJIN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 5,178 4,320 4,320 7,200Other Pavement Rehabs 100% ST 7,200 PE 2,400 2,400 2,400
80% FHWA 59,750 C 3,950 600 9,600 9,600 36,000
20-063-18 SR 1, Nassau Bridge to SR 16 100% ST 250 PE 25080%FHWA 2,500 C 2,500
99-045-01 US113A, South State Street,Dover SR 10 to Webbs Lane 80% FHWA 1,630 C 1,630
99-061-11 Library Ave., Kensington Lane 100% ST 105 PE 105Lane to SR273, Newark 80% FHWA 6,500 C 6,500
99-044-03 New Linden Hill Rd.Polly Drummond Rd toSR 7 80% FHWA 4788 C 4788
99-061-16 SR 9, Kent County Line 100% ST 230 PE 230to N453 100% ST 26 R/W 26
100% ST 2,002 C 2,002
99-044-02 Terminal Ave. I-495 to SR 9 100% ST 252 PE 25280% FHWA 1,800 C 1,800
21-063-01 US113, Milford, SR1 to Sussex 80% FHWA 3,850 C 3,850County Line
All $ X 1,000
PAVEMENT RESURFACING
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Resurfacing of all State maintained roadways except for Suburban Streets. Locations for FY 2002 will be determined after the springinspection. In FY 2001, repaving of detour routes overused during the reconstruction of I-95 phase I is also being completed.
There are many types of resurfacing treatments, which may vary by materials and depth of improvement. Below are listed some of the most typical, including width ofimprovement and estimated cost per mile. In addition to these baseline estimates an additional 10% is normally added for construction engineering and/or the managementexpenses associated with a contract.
FY 2000 the Department began a $2 million per year program for conversion of surface treatment roads to hot-mix.
Treatment Width – Feet Est. Cost Per Mile $Full Width Surface Treatment 20 8,5002” Hot Mix Overlay 20 88,0002” Hot Mix Overlay with 10% Patch 20 137,3003” Hot Mix Overlay with 10’ Shoulders 20 177,1904’ Widening with 3” Hot Mix Overlay 20 168,000Total Reconstruction 1,200,000Microsurfacing – Two Courses 30,000
County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
FMB ID INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR PROJECT FUNDING EST COST TO 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
PROJ # SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJIN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 24,000 24,000 24,000 72,000Resurfacing 100% ST 154,941 22,941 22,000 22,000 22,000 66,000Surface Treatment Hot Mix Conversion 100% ST 14,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,000I-95 Paving from detour routes 100% ST 1,000 1,000
All $ X 1,000
RAIL PRESERVATION
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:
A) The State conducts programmed maintenance to sustain and upgrade the condition of State-owned rail lines. The State currently owns two active freight lines in SussexCounty. Decades of deferred maintenance by the previous owner have left these lines in a condition that threatens their continued viability and safety. Programmedmaintenance is proposed to restore these lines to a safe and economically viable condition consistent with operational viability FRA Track Class III status, which willpermit freight train speeds to increase from 10 to 40mph. This, in turn, promotes operational viability.
B) The Historic Red Clay Valley Program Grant - Matching grant (DTC share is 40%) to Historic Red Clay Valley, Inc. (Wilmington & Western Railway) for trackimprovements of rail freight.
C) Amtrak Station improvements including platform and passenger convenience areas.
D) DelDOT has agreed to pay Amtrak annually for its share of preserving the passenger line between Newark and Wilmington.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project preserves Delaware's competitive position by maintaining its current industrial and agricultural base, thereby retaining employersin the State. In addition, it can reduce truck traffic on Delaware highways, enhance highway safety, and (potentially) reduce investment in highway infrastructure. HRCVProgram Grant - State-matching grant provides funds to preserve the Wilmington & Western rail system as a means of promoting tourism and rail freight service.
County: New Castle/SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
FMB ID INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR PROJECT FUNDING EST COST TO 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
PROJECT # SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJIN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 2,039 949 949 2,847A. State Owned Line 100% ST 1,180 220 160 160 160 480
B. HRCV Maint Grant 100% ST 350 50 50 50 50 150
C. Amtrak Station Improvements 100% ST 3,500 2,410 1,090
D. Northeast Corridor Capitalization 100% ST 5,803 1,369 739 739 739 2,217
All $ X 1,000
TRANSIT FACILITIES PRESERVATION
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
A. Wilmington Operations Complex – General repairs, including: roof repairs for body shop and administration buildings; parking lot repairs; new fire alarm in body shop;replacement of heat pump; new air compressor; and air dryer for operations building.
B. Equipment and Tools – Replace support equipment needed for fixed route and demand response vehicle maintenance. This includes engine and transmission diagnosticequipment, engine service kits, tier maintenance equipment, spare transmissions, brake lathes, hydraulic dollies, transmission jack, jib crane, portable heaters, andspecialized tools required to maintain vehicle systems.
C. Madison Street Facility Upgrades – Purchase and installation of emergency generator for facility electrical system, energy management system floor scrubber formaintenance of area, and replacement of one HVAC chiller.
County: StatewideProgram Category: System Preservation
FMB ID INDIVIDUAL CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR PROJECT FUNDING EST COST TO 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
PROJECT # SEGMENTS COMPLETE PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJIN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 395 98 80 120
Wilmington Operations Complex 100% ST 233 233
Equipment and Tools 100% ST 569 109 162 98 80 120
Madison Street Facilities upgrade 100% ST 139 139
TRANSIT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT AND REFURBISHMENT
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
A. 30’ Medium Duty Buses – Purchase buses and Inspection Services in FY2003 (5) to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved Service Plan and supportingvehicle replacement schedule.
B. 30’ Heavy Duty Low Floor Buses – Purchase buses and Inspection Services FY 2002 (3) to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved Service Plan andsupporting vehicle replacement schedule.
C. 25’ Cutaway Transit Buses – Purchase buses and Inspection Services in FY 2004 (15), FY 2006 (2) and FY 2007 (2) to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTCapproved Service Plan and supporting vehicle replacement schedule.
D. 40’ Transit Buses – Purchase a combination of low floor (51) and standard floor (19) buses and Inspection Services in FY 1999 (46) and FY 2001 (24) and inspectionservices to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved Service Plan and supporting vehicle replacement schedule.
E. Intercounty Buses – Seven (7) buses in FY 1999 to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved Service Plan and supporting vehicle replacement schedule.
F. Paratransit Buses/Vans – Purchase buses and Inspection Services in FY 2001 (42), FY 2002 (30), FY 2003 (30), FY2004 (31), FY2005 (57), FY2006 (77) and FY2007(42)to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved Service Plan and supporting vehicle replacement schedule
G. Section 5310 – Program funds for organizations to provide transportation for the elderly and disabled.
H. Unicity Buses – Purchase one replacement bus biannually (City of Newark).
I. Support Vehicles –Street supervision and staff vehicles and pickup trucks to be used in accordance with the DelDOT/DTC approved vehicle replacement schedule.
County: StatewideProgram Category: System Preservation
TRANSIT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT AND REFURBISHMENT (CONTINUED)
INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJSEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 2,014 2,134 2,250 21,140
A. Medium Duty Buses – Fixed Route (5) 100% ST 1,252 1,252
B. 30’ Heavy Duty Buses (3) 80% FTSA 924 924
C. 25’ Cutawasy Buses (15) 100% ST 1,287 1,28725’ Cutaway Buses (4) 100% ST 365 365
D. 40’ Transit Buses 80% FTA 2,750 2,750
40’ Buses – Cost Differential 100% ST 1,040 1,040
40’ Transit Buses (68) 80% FTA/Disc FTA 24,247 24,247
E. Intercounty Buses (1) 100% ST 47 47
F. Paratransit Buses (42) 100% ST 2,584 2,584Paratransit Buses (30) 80% FTA 2,411 2,411Paratransit Buses (30) 80% FTA 2,181 2,181Paratransit Buses (31) 80% FTA 2,321 2,321Paratransit Buses (176) 100% ST 14,334 14,334
G. Sec 16B2 (5310) Elderly and Handicapped 80% FTA 2,338 334 334 334 334 1,002Sec 16B2 (5310) Elderly and Handicapped 100% ST 2,338 334 334 334 334 1,002
H. Unicity Buses 100% ST 270 90 90 90
I. Support Vehicles 80% FTA 1,761 223 40 1,498Support Vehciles 100% ST 516 299 217
All $ X 1,000
CORRIDOR PRESERVATION AND ADVANCED ACQUISITION OF RIGHTS OF WAY
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The corridor preservation program has four main goals: maintain a road’s ability to handle traffic efficiently and safely; minimize thetransportation impacts of increased economic growth; preserve the ability to make future transportation-related improvements, as needed; and prevent the need to build anentirely new road.
In accordance with these goals, there are several techniques and methods used to preserve the capacity of a highway corridor. As part of the subdivision review process, thedepartment attempts to manage access for new development by requiring entrances onto secondary or frontage roads, as opposed to direct access on to a main highway. Whereapplicable, shared entrances are also encouraged. As part of the program, the department can purchase property access rights, development rights, or properties in whole, inorder to make needed transportation improvements or preserve the highway’s capacity. The program may also include individual improvements such as frontage roads,intersection improvements, and overpasses.
Four corridors have currently been approved: US301; SR 48, from Hercules Road to SR 41; US 13 from the Maryland line to SR 10 in Camden; and US113 from the Marylandline to Milford.
In addition to preserving capacity on selected corridors, funds are also authorized for selected early property acquisitions for proposed projects (those under programdevelopment or design) where, under current procedures, it is determined to be in the best interest of the State to purchase (protect) property subject to development and/or aproperty owner hardship is identified. This is done in cases where a project has a high probability of proceeding to construction, but has not yet proceeded to a point in designwhere finite right of way plans have been developed.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To maintain capacity along transportation corridors and to provide funding for protective buying and hardship acquisitions involving projectsunder program development or design.
County: StatewideProgram Category: System Management
INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ
SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 5,100 5,100 5,100 3,300
Rail Corridor Preservation 100% ST 700 100 100 100 100 300Highway Corridor Preservation 100% ST 18,871 3,871 5,000 5,000 5,000
Inc. US 13, US113, SR 48, SR 1, and US301 80% FHWA 17,000 2,000 15,000
All $ X 1,000
INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ITMS)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION: Integrated Transportation Management Systems (ITMS) are a multi-modal approach to improving the movement ofpeople and goods. ITMS uses modern technology (often referred to as Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)) and a Transportation Management Center (TMC, or controlroom) to monitor travel and adjust signals, signage, transit, etc. to lessen congestion. Some benefits include:
• Safer Travel – New traffic control systems can reduce the number of vehicle stops, minimize changes in vehicle speeds, and improve traffic flow -- all of which helpreduce the number of accidents.
• Less Traffic Congestion – ITMS reduces traffic jams and travel time by continuously monitoring current conditions and automatically adjusting traffic signals, freewayramp access, lane use, and transit schedules in response to real - time demand. Less traffic congestion results in safer, less stressful driving conditions.
• Better Travel Information – At home, en route, or at work, travelers will have access to real-time, accurate information about transit, train, and flight schedules, roadwayconditions, and other travel information via radio, kiosks, cable TV, internet access, and variable message signs on the bus or highway.
• Improved Inter-modal Coordination - With the help of better travel information, travelers can make better decisions as to mode choice. For example, if a traveler is awarethat his or her regular route to work is congested, he or she may opt for taking transit that particular day. Schedule and fare information provided in real-time makes trainand bus transfers more convenient. Transportation managers benefit as well, as they can maximize the system’s efficiency by coordinating their activities across travelmodes. For example, the TMC can provide buses traveling behind schedule with longer “green time” at signalized intersections to help them get back on schedule.
• Quicker Emergency Response – With monitoring equipment, the TMC may detect, verify, and respond more quickly to incidents on the State’s transportation system.Together with its emergency response partners ( i.e. Department of Public Safety, Volunteer Firemen’s Association, and Department of Natural Resources andEnvironmental Control (DNREC), the TMC can act to ensure that incidents are cleared more quickly, reducing congestion and increasing safety. In the future, travelers inneed of aid can benefit from communication and information technology which, among other things, can automatically send “mayday signals” to dispatch centers sotrained emergency staff may locate an incident more quickly. Cellular call-in programs such as #77 and motorist call boxes are also used to facilitate emergency responses.
• Reduced Costs – ITMS technology allows DelDOT to make more efficient use of its existing resources by automating functions, sharing real time information, andimproving safety. It also helps private companies through improved freight delivery. Consumers save money through more efficient travel.
INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ITMS) (CONTINUED)
The Case for Change – Delaware’s transportation system, like so many others around the nation, is experiencing a number of competing pressures and demands. DelDOTcustomers prefer a transportation system that supports, not impedes, their high standards for quality of life, including employment opportunities, a sense of community, qualityeducation and the protection of its cultural and natural resources. Funding constraints and the need for transportation to become more seamless and integrated, along with therapid development of technology to provide or enhance critical transportation improvements, have made traditional approaches to transportation awkward, difficult, costly and -- in some -- cases obsolete. Proven transportation management strategies using control, monitoring, information and communication technology can provide real solutions tothese challenging problems – saving time, saving lives and saving money.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To ensure better traffic flow throughout the State.
County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/04-6/05 7/05-6/07SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,060 634 700 2,555
Transportation Management CommunicationsStatewide 80% FHWA 3,850 550 550 550 550 3,900
New Castle County/I-95 Corridor 80% FHWA 8,147 415 1,650 950 1,283 3,849Kent County 80% FHWA 4,456 515 1,100 568 568 1,704Sussex County/Resorts Access 80% FHWA 4,450 325 1,100 605 605 1,815
Statewide ITMS Integration FHWA/DISCFHWA/ST
3,145 3,145
SR141 / US202 Area Improvements 80% FHWA 400 400
TMC Center, Smyrna 50% FHWA 6,000 6,000
DelDOT Radio/AVL 80% FHWA 6,575 3,600 500 495 495 1,485
All $ X 1,000
INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ITMS) (CONTINUED)
ITMS PROJECT AREAS NEW CASTLE COUNTY ITMS
ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty Boundaries250 Critical Miles
ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty Boundaries250 Critical Miles
WILMINGTON
NEW PORT
NEW CASTLENEW ARK
DELAWARE CITY
ODESSAMIDDLETOWN
SMYRNA
ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities
WILMINGTON
NEW PORT
NEW CASTLENEW ARK
DELAWARE CITY
ODESSAMIDDLETOWN
SMYRNA
ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities
INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ITMS) (CONTINUED)
KENT COUNTY ITMS SUSSEX COUNTY ITMS
SMYRNA
WOODSIDE MAGNOLIA
FREDERICA
HARRINGTON MILFORD
FARMINGTON
DOVER
ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities
SMYRNA
WOODSIDE MAGNOLIA
FREDERICA
HARRINGTON MILFORD
FARMINGTON
DOVER
ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities
HARRINGTON MILFORD
FARMINGTON
GREENW OOD
BRIDGEVILLE
MILTON
SEAFORD
GEORGETOW N
LEW ES
REHOBOTH
DEW EY BEACH
LAUREL
DELMAR
MILLSBORO
SELBYVILLE
SOUTH BETHANY
FENW ICK ISLAND
BETHANY BEACH
ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities
HARRINGTON MILFORD
FARMINGTON
GREENW OOD
BRIDGEVILLE
MILTON
SEAFORD
GEORGETOW N
LEW ES
REHOBOTH
DEW EY BEACH
LAUREL
DELMAR
MILLSBORO
SELBYVILLE
SOUTH BETHANY
FENW ICK ISLAND
BETHANY BEACH
ITMS Project AreasMajor Water BodiesCounty BoundariesMajor Road Segments250 Critical MilesMuncipalities
INTERMODAL/MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Design and construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, transit access, park and ride facilities, traffic calming, and other non-motorized transportation projects. Projects funded from this program over the six year include -- but are not limited to -- those listed below.Additional projects will be identified over the six year period and recommended for funding by the Department’s Project Development Committee (PDC) and State MPO’s.
Transit Passenger FacilitiesPurchase and installation of bus stop pads, passenger shelters, associated lighting systems, benches, schedule display racks, trash receptacles and bus stop signs.Approximately 25% of the statewide transit system stops will be evaluated and receive upgrades annually. These upgrades can range from installation of new signs to lightedpassenger shelters and related street furniture. All new stops and upgrades will be accessible in accordance with the Americians with Disabilities Act standards. The fundingbelow will allow for installation of approximately 25 shelters, 20 benches, and 200 concrete pads annually. Projected costs for rehabilitation of paving maintenance striping ofpavement at Department-owned Park and Ride Facilities are also included, as well as the acquisition cost of right-of-way space that is required to install passenger amenities inaccordance with policy guidelines.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To enhance multimodal transportation throughout the State and encourage movement of people and goods through other than single occupantvehicles.County: StatewideProgram Category: System Management
INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ
SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 4,158 4,995 988 1,479
Traffic Calming 100% ST 1,100 PE/C 364 336 40080% FHWA 1,600 PE/C 400 1,200
• Beck’s Woods• Mifflin Road 100% ST 36 PE 36
100% ST 64 C 64
• Harvey Road 80% FHWA 850 C 850
Bicycle / Pedestrian Improvements 80% FHWA 2,386 386 2,000
• Dover Sidewalks� US 13 – South White Oak to 80% FHWA 173 PE 173
Townsend 80% FHWA 90 R/W 9080% FHWA 882 C 882
• Philadelphia Pike – Curb ramps 80% FHWA 70 PE/C 70
• SR 2/SR141, Pedestrian crossing 80% FHWA 150 PE 150Prices Corner 80% FHWA 100 R/W 100
80% FHWA 580 C 580
INTERMODAL/MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ
SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
Bicycle / Pedestrian Improvements (Continued)
• SR 72 Bikeway extension 80% FHWA 106 PE 10680% FHWA 35 R/W 3580% FHWA 385 C 385
• Paper Mill Road (SR 72) bike lanes 80% FHWA 250 PE 25080% FHWA 100 R/W 10080% FHWA 1,600 C 1,600
• Iron Hill bikeway 80% FHWA 140 PE 14080% FHWA 121 R/W 12180% FHWA 814 C 814
• Del Tech Georgetown – SR18 80% FHWA 295 C 295
• Plantations Road bike lanes 80% FHWA 55 PE 55100% ST 15 R/W 15
80% FHWA 186 C 186
• SR 1 – Extend from Salisbury Road 80% FHWA 250 PE 250Through Dewey beach 80% FHWA 1,000 C 1,000
• Christina Parkway bikeway extension 80% FHWA 44 PE 44(SR 4) 80% FHWA 163 C 163
• SR141 / US202 Area Improvements� West Side Park Improvements 100% ST 400 PE 400
100% ST 3,294 C 3,294� East Side Park Improvements 100% ST 252 PE 252
100% ST 3,194 C 3,194� East Side Wooded Pathway 100% ST 323 PE/C 323
• Wilmington Bike routes 80% FHWA 600 PE/C 600
Transit Access – Park n Ride Lots 80% FHWA 2,600 PE/R/W/C 500 300 300 300 1,200• SR 48 & Loveville Road 80% FHWA 265 C 350
Transit Passenger Facilities• Bus Stop improvements 100% ST 2,073 1,000 429 429 215• Park n Ride Repairs 100% ST 450 340 30 35 45• Right of Way acquisition 100% ST 210 70 35 105
All $ X 1,000
OTHER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECTS TO BE IDENTIFIED
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Funds have been allocated in this program for those projects identified through the Project Development Committee that will improvethe capacity of the existing transportation service and/or infrastructure without having to resort to expansion.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Funds are available for additional management projects identified through the management systems of the Department. The followingimprovements are scheduled to advance from Program Development to design as they are defined. The following table indicates the current schedule for these handoffs tobegin design work on recommended solutions.
FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007• Bassett Street Intersection ------ ------------• Carter Road from Sunnyside Road to SR300 ------------ ------------• Harrington Truck Route ------------• Churchman’s Road/Airport Road intersection improvement ------------ ------• SR 15/Road 407/Road447, Milford, various improvements ------------ ------------• New Castle transportation improvements – as recommended from studies ------------ ------------ ------------• SR 41, (Lancaster Pike), Yorklyn Road to Valley Road (construction) ------------• Foulk Road 160’ North of Naaman’s Road to PA Line including shoulders ------------• Salem Church Road from I-95 to Gender Road ------------• Possum Park Road from Old Possum Park to Possum Hollow, including drainage improvements ------------
County: StatewideProgram Category: System Management
EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 514 3,974 2,343 6,38080% FHWA 48,071 2,600 3,000 9,669 31,902
100% ST 6,093 389 3,374 410
All $ X 1,000
SAFETY, INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AND TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:
A. Safety Improvements: Selected safety improvements statewide. These locations are identified through the safety management program.B. Rail Crossing Safety: Selected safety improvements at highway/rail crossings throughout the State as identified by the safety management system program.C. Intersection Improvements: Minor intersection improvements statewide.D. Transportation Enhancements: Enhancements (bicycle and pedestrian, landscaping, historic restoration, etc) to existing transportation facilities. An Advisory
Committee recommends locations for this program to the Department. In FY 2001, this program was be increased from $3.4 million per year to $4.0 million per year.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:A. Federally mandated safety improvement program.B. Federally mandated safety improvement program.C. Intersections throughout the State need to be upgraded as funding permits to alleviate congestion and provide safer turning movements.D. Federally mandated program for non-traditional enhancements to transportation infrastructure and services.
County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ
SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,377 1,284 1,377 4,255
Safety Improvements - HSIP Program 90% FHWA 11,266 860 1,889 962 1,889 5,667
Rail Crossing Safety 90% FHWA 5,000 1,250 625 625 625 1,875100% ST 800 200 100 100 100 300
Intersection Improvements/Safety Improvements 100% ST 1,160 285 125 125 125 500City of New Castle - Intersections 80% FHWA 3,000 500 500 500 1,500McKinnans Church/Mill Creek - Inter.
Transportation Enhancements 80% FHWA/FTA 28,735 4,735 4,000 4,000 4,000 12,000Fox Point Park 100% ST 500 500Rehoboth Visitors Center 100% ST 250 250
All $ X 1,000
TRANSIT – BUS AND SECURITY EQUIPMENT
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
BUS EQUIPMENT:1) Mobile Video Surveillance Equipment for fixed route public transit and
related monitoring equipment.2) Voice enunciators to provide automated (and ADA required) stop
announcements on fixed route buses.
3) Infrared passenger counters for fixed route buses to aid in route evaluationand assisting in developing federally required operational informationreporting data.
4) Operator/Maintenance Training equipment and aids.
SECURITY EQUIPMENT:1) Madison Street, Newark Station, Claymont and Churchman’s/Fairplay Station
security, including: cameras and initial system acquisition; installation ofwiring; power units; monitors; and support equipment.
2) Dover Administrative Facility cameras and equipment.
County: StatewideProgram Category: System Management
FMB ID INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR PROJECT COMPLETE FUNDING 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/05-6/07 PROJPROJ # SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
395 585Bus Equipment
Voice Enunciators 217 80% FTA 217Passenger Counters 440 100% ST 440Operator/Maint. Training Equip. & Aids
Training Aids 75 80% FTA 75
Security EquipmentMadison St, Newark Station, Claymont,Churchman’s Fairplay Station
100 100% ST 20 80
Dover Administration Facility 80 100% ST 80
Upgrade Video system on Gilleg Buses 235 100% ST 235
Upgrade Video system on 35’ Champion Buses 185 100% ST 185
Upgrade Video system on 7 low floor Gilleg Buses 35 100% ST 35
Upgrade Video system on 63 NABI Buses 365 100% ST 365
All $ X 1,000
OTHER SYSTEM EXPANSION PROJECTS TO BE IDENTIFIED
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Funds have been allocated in this program for those projects identified by the Project Development Committee (PDC) and developedthrough the Planning process, including access from SR 1, from East of Dover to the Garrison Tract, and the dualization of SR 4.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Funds are available for additional expansion projects identified through the various management systems of the Department.
County: StatewideMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
INDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/05-6/07
SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 1,524 2,211 2,812 3,023Other Projects to be Identified 80% FHWA 23981 2,000 2,813 10,723 8,446
100% ST 3,779 341 1,124 1,648 667 1,334
All $ X 1,000
TRANSIT FACILITIES EXPANSION, STATEWIDE
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
Rehoboth Facilities Expansion – Design and construction of a prefabricated maintenance garage at the Rehoboth Park and Ride capable of housing a vehicle lift for chassismaintenance on 30’ buses. (Figure below includes additional $65,000 approved by PDC above the original estimate due to scope change.)
Georgetown Facility – Bus vehicle parking capacity will be augmented to support expected fleet size (and spaces lost due to bus wash construction) by expanding parkingsurface at a location either adjacent or close to the current location.
Dover Operations Facility – Construction of an alternative fuel facility for more fuel efficient buses and cleaner emmisions.
New Castle – Mid County – Land acquisition, design and construction of a satellite facility to house a portion of DTC’s New Castle County fixed route and paratransitoperations, including vehicle storage and maintenance.
SR141 / US202 Transit Hub – Construction of a transit hub in the Astra/Zeneca area.
Wilmington Operations Facility – Expansion of bus parking lots; repaving; addition of sand filters to existing lots; and replacement of structural components of the existingfacility.
Bulk Engine Oil and ATF Tanks – Bulk storage tanks for both engine oil and automatic transmission fluid to provide economies of scale in purchasing and ease of handlingby maintenance personnel.
County: StatewideProgram Category: System Expansion
TRANSIT FACILITIES EXPANSION, STATEWIDE (CONTINUED)FMB
IDINDIVIDUAL EST COST TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/05-6/07 PROJPROJ# SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 365 226 0 4,276Rehoboth 100% ST 238 238
Georgetown Facility 100% STRevenue Vehicle Parkingaugmentation
50 50
Dover Operations Facility
Access Easement 100% ST 240 R/W 240Alternative Fuel 80% FTA 693 C 693
100% ST 1,722 C 1,722
New Castle County – MidDesign 80% Disc FTA 790 PE 790Site Development 80% Disc FTA 1,079 PE 1,079Construction 100% ST 5,727 C 5,727Special Equipment 100% ST 3,198 C 3,198Interior Construction 100% ST 1,500 C 1,500Equipment Furnishings 100% ST 50 PRO 50Alternative Fuel 100% ST 2,415 C 2,415
SR141 / US202 Area Transit Hub 100% ST 340 PE 340100% ST 1,000 C 1,000
Wilmington Operations FacilityLand Acq /Demolition 100% ST 715 R/W 715Sand Filter/Gar/Doors/Repav 100% ST 175 C 175DART II Roof and Alarm Syst. 100% ST 65 C 65Replace Vehicle Maint. Lift 100% ST 226 C 226
Bulk Oil Tanks 100% ST 10 C 10
All $ X 1,000
BR 1 ON RISING SUN ROAD OVER BRANDYWINE CREEK
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitate existing steel truss members andsubstructure. Place a high performance deck overlay; make safety improvements atapproaches; and fill scour holes.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient;and currently ranks 14th on the deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 4Senatorial District: 6
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 25 200 0 0
21-074-01 100% ST 100 PE 100100% ST 25 R/W 25
80% FHWA 1,000 C 1,000
All $ X 1,000
PONDS
LA
BRANDON LA
BARTONCIR
HO
HOPETONRD MT
.VERNONAVE
TOWERRD
MTSALE
BRINKLEYAVE
VISTA DR
VISTADR
LOOKOUT DR
TOWERDR
TOWERDR
17TH RI
RED OAK RD
WILLARD ST
ROCKFORDRD
IVYRD
SIENA
OLD CHURCH
RD
RD
LEY
RD
RD
EDGEHILL
141
PENNSYLVAN
NEWPONDS
LA
BRANDON LA
BARTONCIR
HO
HOPETONRD MT
.VERNONAVE
TOWERRD
MTSALE
BRINKLEYAVE
VISTA DR
VISTADR
LOOKOUT DR
TOWERDR
TOWERDR
17TH RI
RED OAK RD
WILLARD ST
ROCKFORDRD
IVYRD
SIENA
OLD CHURCH
RD
RD
LEY
RD
RD
EDGEHILL
141
PENNSYLVAN
NEW
BR 1B ON KENNETT PIKE (SR 52) OVER RAILROAD EAST OF SR141
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The proposed improvements will replace the existingsuperstructure with prestressed concrete beams and a concrete deck. Minor safetyimprovements to the approach roadway are also included in the plans.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Superstructure is in poor conditionand the encased concrete steel beams are exposed. It is currently ranked63rd on the bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 4Senatorial District: 6
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 18 0 0 0
99-071-08 80% FHWA 790 C 790
All $ X 1,000
LATHAXTEN
LAKENSIN
GTON
W.
PLCLIVDEN
PL
CLIVDENE.
AU
GU
STA
RD
PONDS LA
WESTOVER
VE
R
RD
RD
EDGEHILLPRINCETON RD
GREENW
BRANDON LA
BAR
TON
CIR
ES
SE
XR
W.
ETO
NR
D
HOPETONRD
MT.
VER
NO
NA
VETO
WE
RR
DM
TSA
LEM
LA
BRIN
VISTA DRLOOKOUT DRTOW
ERDR
17T
DR
SA
NTO
ME
RA
TER
AM
O
LA
L A
BE
LLAN
T
CT
FAIRTHORNE LA
ORIENTE
AVE
OV
ER
BR
OO
KRD
ARLEY
DR
RM
OLD CHURCH
RD
PRESI
DEN
TIAL
DR
SENITO
RIAL
DR
CONGRESSIONAL
DR
KENT
RDSTUARTRD
RD
CECIL
BERKLEY
RD
NEW
PIK
E
PENNSYLVANIA
AVERD
141
BR 1B
LATHAXTEN
LAKENSIN
GTON
W.
PLCLIVDEN
PL
CLIVDENE.
AU
GU
STA
RD
PONDS LA
WESTOVER
VE
R
RD
RD
EDGEHILLPRINCETON RD
GREENW
BRANDON LA
BAR
TON
CIR
ES
SE
XR
W.
ETO
NR
D
HOPETONRD
MT.
VER
NO
NA
VETO
WE
RR
DM
TSA
LEM
LA
BRIN
VISTA DRLOOKOUT DRTOW
ERDR
17T
DR
SA
NTO
ME
RA
TER
AM
O
LA
LA
BE
LLAN
T
CT
FAIRTHORNE LA
ORIENTE
AVE
OV
ER
BR
OO
KRD
ARLEY
DR
RM
OLD CHURCH
RD
PRESI
DEN
TIAL
DR
SENITO
RIAL
DR
CONGRESSIONAL
DR
KENT
RDSTUARTRD
RD
CECIL
BERKLEY
RD
NEW
PIK
E
PENNSYLVANIA
AVERD
141
BR 1B
BR 9 ON SMITH’S BRIDGE ROAD (N221) OVER BRANDYWINE CREEK
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace superstructure with a one lane coveredtimber bridge. Traffic control signals are also being considered due to sight distanceconcerns.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient with poor substructure. It currently ranks 122nd on thebridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 10, 12Senatorial District: 6
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 138 0 0 0
99-071-22 80% FHWA 1,400 C 1,400
All $ X 1,000
ROCKBL
ME
ADO
WS
LA
BREEZE HILL
RDNN
ER
D
GU
MEETING RD
SMITH
SBRID
GERD
RIDGE RD
RAMSEY RD
BEAVERVALLEY RD
WOODL
100
92
BR 9
PA LINE
PA LINE
BR 9
PA LINE
PA LINE
ROCKBL
ME
ADO
WS
LA
BREEZE HILL
RDNN
ER
D
GU
MEETING RD
SMITH
SBRID
GERD
RIDGE RD
RAMSEY RD
BEAVERVALLEY RD
WOODL
100
92
BR 9
PA LINE
PA LINE
BR 9
PA LINE
PA LINE
BR 26 ON FOULK ROAD OVER NAAMAN’S CREEK
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include replacing theexisting superstructure and rehabilitating the substructure; safety improvements atthe approaches; and scour measures for the foundation.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 53rd on the bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 10Senatorial District: 5
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 90 0 0 0
20-071-09 100% ST 17 R/W 1780% FHWA 367 C 367
All $ X 1,000
R
EN RD
Y RD
WOODLAND RD
SILVERSIDE RD
MAR
SHRD
RD
GRUBB RD
GRUBB RD
SH
IPLE
YR
DS
HIP
LEY
RD
CO
NC
OR
DP
I
FOULK
RDEB
RIGH
TRD
DARLEY
RD
RD
MA
RS
HR
DM
ARSHRD
G
HARVEYRD
LEY
NAAMA
FOU
LKRD
202
202
261
92261
92
ARDEN
ARDENCROFT
ARDENTOWN
BR 26
BR 66 ON BRECK’S LANE, NORTH OF WILMINGTON
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The superstructure will be replaced with concreteslab. The existing truss will be reconstructed and reinstalled as façade. Concrete curbingwill be placed at approaches and along the length of the bridge.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and is ranked 28th on the bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 4Senatorial District: 6
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 13 0 0 0
99-071-05 100% ST 6 R/W 6100% ST 8 ENV 8
80% FHWA 230 C 230
All $ X 1,000
AU
GU
ST
AR
D
PONDS LA
WESTO
VER
WE
STO
VE
R
RD
RD
EDGEHILLPRINCETON RD
GREENWOODRD
BRANDON LA
BAR
TON
CIR
ES
SE
XR
D
ES
SEX
RD
E.
W.
PRINCETONRD
DICKENSON LA YH
OP
ETO
NR
D
HOPETON
RD
W.C
IR
MT.
VER
NO
NAV
ET
OW
ERR
DM
TSA
LEM
LA
BRIN
KLEY
AVE
VISTA DR
VIST
ADR
LOOKOUT DRTOW
ERDR TO
WER
DR
17TH
ST
ST
CLI
NTO
N
RIV
ERV
IEW
AVE
HAM
ILTO
NST
PKY
VE
RED OAK RDWILLARD ST RO
CKFO
RD
RD
IVY
RD
SIENA RD
HILL RD
WOOD
RD
GRANT AVE
LINCOLNST
SCOTTST
KENTMEREPKY
KENTMEREWAW
ASETST
WILLIAM
SON
ST
RID
DLE
A
FOSTER
PL
RELP
L
OC
KD
RMONTCHAN DR
OLD CHURCH
RD
PRES
IDEN
TIAL
DR
SENITO
RIALD
R
CONGRESSIONAL
DR
KENT
RDSTUART
RD
RD
CECIL
BERKLEY
RD
NEW
NE
TTP
IKE
PENNSYLVANIA
AVERD
141
BR 66BR 66AU
GU
ST
AR
D
PONDS LA
WESTO
VER
WE
STO
VE
R
RD
RD
EDGEHILLPRINCETON RD
GREENWOODRD
BRANDON LA
BAR
TON
CIR
ES
SE
XR
D
ES
SEX
RD
E.
W.
PRINCETONRD
DICKENSON LA YH
OP
ETO
NR
D
HOPETON
RD
W.C
IR
MT.
VER
NO
NAV
ET
OW
ERR
DM
TSA
LEM
LA
BRIN
KLEY
AVE
VISTA DR
VIST
ADR
LOOKOUT DRTOW
ERDR TO
WER
DR
17TH
ST
ST
CLI
NTO
N
RIV
ERV
IEW
AVE
HAM
ILTO
NST
PKY
VE
RED OAK RDWILLARD ST RO
CKFO
RD
RD
IVY
RD
SIENA RD
HILL RD
WOOD
RD
GRANT AVE
LINCOLNST
SCOTTST
KENTMEREPKY
KENTMEREWAW
ASETST
WILLIAM
SON
ST
RID
DLE
A
F OSTER
PL
RELP
L
OC
KD
RMONTCHAN DR
OLD CHURCH
RD
PRES
IDEN
TIAL
DR
SENITO
RIALD
R
CONGRESSIONAL
DR
KENT
RDSTUART
RD
RD
CECIL
BERKLEY
RD
NEW
NE
TTP
IKE
PENNSYLVANIAAVER
D
141
BR 66BR 66
BR 89 ON SNUFF MILL ROAD
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The existing structure will be replaced with aconcrete box culvert, with stone face parapets and wingwalks –the latter to be tapered and flared outside of the clear zone toeliminate the need for a guardrail.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 46th on the bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 12Senatorial District: 6
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 60 0 0 0
99-071-07 100% ST 20 LANSC 2080% FHWA 300 C 300
All $ X 1,000
Shad
owbr
ook
Pond
SON TRACT
RD
SELB
O
HAYWOOD RD
CHANDLE
GREGG AVE
HIG
HR
IDG
ER
D
HAYSTACK LA
STO
NET
CREE
KR
DH
EDG
ERO
WLA
FIELDLA
MEADOWLARK LA
PENTLANDDR
LANARK RD
CE
NT
ERH
IL LR
D
DOL
RD
KENNETT RD
OLD
SNUFF MILL RD
CLO
UD
ES
RD
SNUFF MILL RD
CENTERM
ILLRD
BR 89
PA LINE
PA LINE
Shad
owbr
ook
Pond
SON TRACT
RD
SELB
O
HAYWOOD RD
CHANDLE
GREGG AVE
HIG
HR
IDG
ER
D
HAYSTACK LA
STO
NET
CREE
KR
DH
EDG
ERO
WLA
FIELDLA
MEADOWLARK LA
PENTLANDDR
LANARK RD
CE
NT
ERH
IL LR
D
DOL
RD
KENNETT RD
OLD
SNUFF MILL RD
CLO
UD
ES
RD
SNUFF MILL RD
CENTERM
ILLRD
BR 89
PA LINE
PA LINE
BR 91 ON SNUFF MILL ROAD WEST OF CENTERVILLE
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The existing concrete arch is deteriorated andwill be replaced in kind, with a stone veneer parapet added; safety improvementsincluded at the bridge approaches; as well as scour protection measures for thefoundation.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 97th on our bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 12Senatorial District: 6
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 70 0 0 0
100% ST 60 PE 60100% ST 10 R/W 10
80% FHWA 300 C 300
All $ X 1,000
ME
ADO
WS
SE
LB
OR
NE
DRSYCAMORE LA
HAYWOOD RD
CHANDLER LAGREGG AVEMOUNT AIRY DR
WO
OD
SID
ED
R
HOLLY LACA
RR
IAG
EC
IR
VALLEY WAY
HISSELLLA
HIG
HR
IDG
ERD
HAYSTACK LA
NET
CRE
EKRD
HED
GER
OW
LA
FIELDLA
LARK LA
PENTLANDDRLANARK
RD
CE
NT
ER
HI LL
RD
52
CENTER MEETING
PYL
ESFO
RD
RD
D
TWA
DD
ELL
MIL
LR
D
D
KENNETT RD
OLD
MILL RD
SNUFF MILL RD
CE
NT
ER
MIL
LR
D
BURNT MILL RD
ME
ADO
WS
SE
LB
OR
NE
DRSYCAMORE LA
HAYWOOD RD
CHANDLER LAGREGG AVEMOUNT AIRY DR
WO
OD
SID
ED
R
HOLLY LACA
RR
IAG
EC
IR
VALLEY WAY
HISSELLLA
HIG
HR
IDG
ERD
HAYSTACK LA
NET
CRE
EKRD
HED
GER
OW
LA
FIELDLA
LARK LA
PENTLANDDRLANARK
RD
CE
NT
ER
HI LL
RD
52
CENTER MEETING
PYL
ESFO
RD
RD
D
TWA
DD
ELL
MIL
LR
D
D
KENNETT RD
OLD
MILL RD
SNUFF MILL RD
CE
NT
ER
MIL
LR
D
BURNT MILL RD
BR119, BR120 ON SR 82 OVER RED CLAY CREEK AND SR 82 SLOPESTABILIZATION AT WAY ROAD
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:BR119 - The proposed work includes replacing the bridge deck; patchingand sealing the substructure concrete; replacing the bridge rail andupgrading the existing guardrail.
BR120 – The project will rehabilitate the existing historic concrete archbridge while maintaining the existing geometry. Guardrails will be placedat the bridge ends to improve safety.
Slope Stabilization – The project will construct retaining structures tostabilize slopes along the roadway in the area of both bridges.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:BR119 - The bridge is structurally deficient and ranks 239th on the bridge deficiency list.(This bridge will be funded from special innovative bridge research and construction funds from Federal Highway Administration [FHWA]).
BR120 – The bridge ranks 53rd on the bridge deficiency list.
Slope Stabilization: Roadway reconstruction 50' before and after retaining wall limits and within the area of slope instability is necessary to prevent worsening safetycondition.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 12
Senatorial District: 6
EST COSTINDIVIDUALL FMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
PROJECT OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1480 163 0 0 0
Bridge 119 20-074-02 100% ST 5 R/W 580% FHWA 430 C
Bridge 120 98-074-01 80% FHWA 1,120 C
Slope Stabilization 97-007-01 80% FHWA 1,050 C
All $ X 1,000
DAWSON TRACTRD
SPR
ING
HOUS
ELA
SPR
ING
HOUS
ELA
LAR
CH
MO
NT
CT
WO
OD
V
MEADOWLARK LA
82
MT
C
ASH
LAN
DSC
HO
OL
RD
ARPLESS RDBLICRD
NRD
SNUFF MILL RD
SR
D CE
N
DAWSON TRACTRD
SPR
ING
HOUS
ELA
SPR
ING
HOUS
ELA
LAR
CH
MO
NT
CT
WO
OD
V
MEADOWLARK LA
82
MT
C
ASH
LAN
DSC
HO
OL
RD
ARPLESS RDBLICRD
NRD
SNUFF MILL RD
SR
D CE
N
PYL
ES
FOR
KE
NN
ETT
PIK
E
PYLESFORD
RD
OW
LES
NE
ST
RD
OLD
WILM AMSEY
RDB
ARLE
YM
ILLR
D
HILLSIDE MILL RD
RD
MTCUBARD
ASH
LAN
DS
CH
OO
LR
D
D
SHARPLESSRDLIC
RD
KLYN
RD
BRAC
KEN
VILL
ER
D
ETT RDSNUFF MILL
TCH
ELL
RD
82
82 82BR174BR174
BR174 ON MT. CUBA ROAD OVER RED CLAY CREEK TRIBUTARY
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include replacement of the existingrigid frame with a four-sided concrete box culvert, as well as the placement of placing riprap toprotect the foundation. Stabilization of the roadway slope near the site will also be addressed.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficientand ranks 103rd on the bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 12Senatorial District: 6
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 89 0 0 0
20-071-01 100% ST 14 R/W 1480% FHWA 228 C 600
All $ X 1,000
LISTER DR
DANDENO
GDR
IRK DR
WH
ITE
KIR
KD
RDR
ISH CT
RY DROR CT
BA
LM
OR
EL
A
BRAEMORE PL
CROSSGATES DR
CIRO CT
TRE
EL
INE
CT
NEWGATE LACONSTANCE DR ABBEY RD E
WE
STM
ON
TD
R
CHELTENGE
DR
KIMBERLY CTLD
R
TANA
SK
YLA
RK
RD
SKYLA
WAXIN
GC
T
TURNSTO
PLOVER C
KLA
ND DR
OAKL ANDDR
DUNLAP DR
HE
RB
ER
TD
R
CARILLON DR
BRISTOL DR
ADDISON DRE. KENMORE DR
WORDSWORTHDR
WORDSWORTHDR
KEMBLE CT
SHERBROOKE
DR
PAISLEYDR
YEARSLEY PLYEARSLEYDR
CO
RA
LOO
P
CHARLES RD
HA
NN
AM
RD
ROBINO DR
LERD
GLEN DR
WHEAD LA
CEDAR AVEMAPLE AVE
HA
RR
ISO
NA
VE
JAC
KS
ON
AV
E
TO
NA
VEPINE AVE
SPRUCE AVE
ELDERADR
NEWELL
DR
NEWELL
ALISTER DRALISTER
DEANDR
DEAN D
BAXTER DR
CA
NO
RA
DR
EL D
ER
DR
FE
NT
ON
DR
GR
AH
MD
R
TI
WOO
AN
GE
LD
R
MA
RLY
ND
R
WO
OD
SR
D
OA
41
SC
HU
RC
HR
D
D
DUNCANRD
FAUKLAND RD
HERCULES RD
LISTER DR
DANDENO
GDR
IRK DR
WH
ITE
KIR
KD
RDR
ISH CT
RY DROR CT
BA
LM
OR
EL
A
BRAEMORE PL
CROSSGATES DR
CIRO CT
TRE
EL
INE
CT
NEWGATE LACONSTANCE DR ABBEY RD E
WE
STM
ON
TD
R
CHELTENGE
DR
KIMBERLY CTLD
R
TANA
SK
YLA
RK
RD
SKYLA
WAXIN
GC
T
TURNSTO
PLOVER C
KLA
ND DR
OAKL ANDDR
DUNLAP DR
HE
RB
ER
TD
R
CARILLON DR
BRISTOL DR
ADDISON DRE. KENMORE DR
WORDSWORTHDR
WORDSWORTHDR
KEMBLE CT
SHERBROOKE
DR
PAISLEYDR
YEARSLEY PLYEARSLEYDR
CO
RA
LOO
P
CHARLES RD
HA
NN
AM
RD
ROBINO DR
LERD
GLEN DR
WHEAD LA
CEDAR AVEMAPLE AVE
HA
RR
ISO
NA
VE
JAC
KS
ON
AV
E
TO
NA
VEPINE AVE
SPRUCE AVE
ELDERADR
NEWELL
DR
NEWELL
ALISTER DRALISTER
DEANDR
DEAN D
BAXTER DR
CA
NO
RA
DR
ELD
ER
DR
FE
NT
ON
DR
GR
AH
MD
R
TI
WOO
AN
GE
LD
R
MA
RLY
ND
R
WO
OD
SR
D
OA
41
SC
HU
RC
HR
D
D
DUNCANRD
FAUKLAND RD
HERCULES RD
BR182 ON FAULKLAND ROAD OVER HYDE RUN SOUTHWEST OF CEDARS
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements willinclude the replacement of the existing concrete deck withlightweight concrete, as well as making existing steel beamscomposite with the concrete deck. The parapet will bereconstructed to resemble the existing parapet.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 92nd on our bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 12, 19Senatorial District: 7,8
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 75 0 0 0
100% ST 60 PE 60100% FHWA 15 R/W 1580% FHWA 300 C 300
All $ X 1,000
DRM
ILBOURN
E
VA
NIE
RD
R ELMA DR
HARRIET CT
SE
IBE
RC
T
NO
NA
NTU
MD
R
NO
NA
NT
UM
DR
WIN
DS
ON
GC
IR
SH
EN
AN
DO
AHD
R
NIGHTINGALE CIR
WIL
KE
RD
EA
ND
R
LEN
AC
T
KERDEAN DR
CA
RLA
CT
WEST
T
THDR
KENNETH
AN
NA
WA
Y
DE
LRO
SE
CT
MARY
ELLA
DR
PHILLIP CT
ST.R
EG
ISD
R
RO
YC
T
CAYNOR CT
RANCH CTLER RD
MOSS CT
GLE
NV
IEW
PL
MEADOW WIND CIR
CR
EEK
BE
ND
CT
OR
C
AS
HA
ELM
AV
E DR
R S. D
MULBERRY RD
FERNCLIFF RD
HILLCROFT RD
NEWBROOK RD
AR
ON
IMIN
KD
RCH
APEL
HILL
DR
ARONIMINK DR
STREG
ISDREBERLY DR
BAL
ANG
ER
RD
EC
KE
RD
R
DECKERDR
ARON
IMINK
DR
STO
NE
YB
RA
ER
D
LAS
TLA
DE
LAP
LAN
EA
VE
DE
LAP
LAN
EA
VE
NORTH PL
ORCHARD RD
RID
GE
AVE
CA
PIT
OL
PL
BIRCH AVE
LAU
RE
LA
VE
OAK AVE ROSE
CIR
CED
AR
AVE
PO
PLA
RA
VE
BO
XW
OO
DA
VE
MA
PLE
AV
E
RO
SEC
IR
CHESTNUT AVE
D
N. DILLWYN RDD
FAIRWAY RD
CORDELE RD
CO
RD
ELE
RD
DU
NB
AR
RD
ELI Z
AB
ET
HC
T
ANDRIES RD
BIS
BE
ER
D
BISBEE CT
WAR
BREWSTER
DA
HUD
MEDILL
LA
G
72
72
APERMILL RD
POSSUM
PARK
RD
KIRKWO
DRM
ILBOURN
E
VA
NIE
RD
R ELMA DR
HARRIET CT
SE
IBE
RC
T
NO
NA
NTU
MD
R
NO
NA
NT
UM
DR
WIN
DS
ON
GC
IR
SH
EN
AN
DO
AHD
R
NIGHTINGALE CIR
WIL
KE
RD
EA
ND
R
LEN
AC
T
KERDEAN DR
CA
RLA
CT
WEST
T
THDR
KENNETH
AN
NA
WA
Y
DE
LRO
SE
CT
MARY
ELLA
DR
PHILLIP CT
ST.R
EG
ISD
R
RO
YC
T
CAYNOR CT
RANCH CTLER RD
MOSS CT
GLE
NV
IEW
PL
MEADOW WIND CIR
CR
EEK
BE
ND
CT
OR
C
AS
HA
ELM
AV
E DR
R S. D
MULBERRY RD
FERNCLIFF RD
HILLCROFT RD
NEWBROOK RD
AR
ON
IMIN
KD
RCH
APEL
HILL
DR
ARONIMINK DR
STREG
ISDREBERLY DR
BAL
ANG
ER
RD
EC
KE
RD
R
DECKERDR
ARON
IMINK
DR
STO
NE
YB
RA
ER
D
LAS
TLA
DE
LAP
LAN
EA
VE
DE
LAP
LAN
EA
VE
NORTH PL
ORCHARD RD
RID
GE
AVE
CA
PIT
OL
PL
BIRCH AVE
LAU
RE
LA
VE
OAK AVE ROSE
CIR
CED
AR
AVE
PO
PLA
RA
VE
BO
XW
OO
DA
VE
MA
PLE
AV
E
RO
SEC
IR
CHESTNUT AVE
D
N. DILLWYN RDD
FAIRWAY RD
CORDELE RD
CO
RD
ELE
RD
DU
NB
AR
RD
ELI Z
AB
ET
HC
T
ANDRIES RD
BIS
BE
ER
D
BISBEE CT
WAR
BREWSTER
DA
HUD
MEDILL
LA
G
72
72
APERMILL RD
POSSUM
PARK
RD
KIRKWO
BR229B ON KIRKWOOD HIGHWAY (SR 2) OVER WHITE CLAY CREEK
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will includethe rehabilitation of the existing steel beams and bearings; the repairof spalled areas of the pier cap and abutments; the scaling ofapproach slab cracks; as well as repair of scour holes around theexisting piers.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficientand ranks 49th on the bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 14Senatorial District: 6,11
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 189 0 0 0
21-074-04 100% ST 75 PE 75100% ST 9 R/W 9
80% FHWA 900 C 900
All $ X 1,000
CHURCHMANSR
OL
CHAPMAN RD AIRPO
RT
RD
OLDCHURCHMANS
RD
AIR
PO
RT
RD
EA
GL
ER
UN
RD
EWAR
KR
D
KIRKWOOD HWY
RED
MILL
RD
OLDHARMONY
RD
OLD
CHURCHMANS
RD
RAPHRD
AS
TO
NR
D
HE
ND
ER
SO
NR
D
K RD
OLD COACH RD
D
OGLETOWN STANTON
RD
95
58
4
58
7
27337
2
BR245BR245
CHURCHMANSR
OL
CHAPMAN RD AIRPO
RT
RD
OLDCHURCHMANS
RD
AIR
PO
RT
RD
EA
GL
ER
UN
RD
EWAR
KR
D
KIRKWOOD HWY
RED
MILL
RD
OLDHARMONY
RD
OLD
CHURCHMANS
RD
RAPHRD
AS
TO
NR
D
HE
ND
ER
SO
NR
D
K RD
OLD COACH RD
D
OGLETOWN STANTON
RD
95
58
4
58
7
27337
2
BR245BR245
BR245 ON HARMONY ROAD OVER AMTRAK
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include the rehabilitation of thebridge with an overlay of the bridge deck; replacement of deck joints; painting of steelbeams; patching and sealing the substructure concrete; and upgrading the guardrailconnections and end treatments.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andranks 322nd on the bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 14,18Senatorial District: 9,11
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 0 0 0
20-074-04 100% ST 720 C 720
All $ X 1,000
CA
RA
VE
LNN RD
PULASKI HWY
WRANGLEHILL
R
OLD PORTER RD
REDLIO
NCHURCH
RD
COUNTRYRD
SU
NS
ET
LAK
ER
D
OC
HS
BR
IDG
ER
D
REYBOLD RD OL
IRO
NH
ILLR
D
89640
71301
BR358WBR358W
CA
RA
VE
LNN RD
PULASKI HWY
WRANGLEHILL
R
OLD PORTER RD
REDLIO
NCHURCH
RD
COUNTRYRD
SU
NS
ET
LAK
ER
D
OC
HS
BR
IDG
ER
D
REYBOLD RD OL
IRO
NH
ILLR
D
89640
71301
BR358WBR358W
BR358 ON PULASKI HIGHWAY (US 40) OVER BELLTOWN RUN, BEAR
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include the replacement of theexisting culvert with a four sided box culvert; as well as the placement of riprap at theinlet and outlet. (Traffic will be maintained during construction by paving the median.)
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient and ranks 165th onthe bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 24Senatorial District: 12
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 482 0 0 0
20-071-06 100% ST 10 R/W 10100% ST 550 C 550
All $ X 1,000
SU
MM
ITB
RID
GE
RD
NOXONTOWN
RD
C D
ETOWN
WICK RD
STANNS
CHURCHRD
NOXONTOWN
RD
SILV
ER
LAK
ER
D
BR
ICK
MI LL
RD
PE
TE
RS
ON
RD
WIG
GI
ILL RD
301
299
15
ODE
MIDDLETOWN
BR407ABR407A
SU
MM
ITB
RID
GE
RD
NOXONTOWN
RD
C D
ETOWN
WICK RD
STANNS
CHURCHRD
NOXONTOWN
RD
SILV
ER
LAK
ER
D
BR
ICK
MI LL
RD
PE
TE
RS
ON
RD
WIG
GI
ILL RD
301
299
15
ODE
MIDDLETOWN
BR407ABR407A
BR407A ON SILVER LAKE ROAD, AT SILVER LAKE
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include replacement of thebridge with a concrete box culvert and sluice gate; construction of a guardrail at both bridgeapproaches; and the placement of riprap at culvert entrance and exit.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient and ranks 84th on thebridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 9Senatorial District: 14
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 300 0 0 0
20-071-04 100% ST 300 C 300
All $ X 1,000
LISA CT
SC
OT
TLA
GREEN SPRING FARM
1
15
CLAYTON DELANEY RD
SPRING RD
CL
AY
TO
NG
RE
EN
SPRIN
GR
D
D
REEN
SPRIN
GR
D
DU
CK
CR
EE
KR
D
JOE GOLDSBOROUGH
RD
LISA CT
SC
OT
TLA
GREEN SPRING FARM
1
15
CLAYTON DELANEY RD
SPRING RD
CL
AY
TO
NG
RE
EN
SPRIN
GR
D
D
REEN
SPRIN
GR
D
DU
CK
CR
EE
KR
D
JOE GOLDSBOROUGH
RD
BR474 ON DELANEY’S ROAD OVER PAW BRANCH, NORTH OF CLAYTON
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will includereplacement of the superstucture with prestressed concrete slabs;construction of a concrete deck; placement of guardrails at bothbridge approaches; and installation of riprap at the bridge abutments.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficientand ranks 96th on the deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 28Senatorial District: 14
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 59 0 0 0
21-071-01 100% ST 16 R/W 1680% FHWA 216 C 216
All $ X 1,000
HARR
ISPL
PICKW
ICK
DR
TRACYCT
NC
ISS
T
NA
CT
OODMILL DR
BA
ILEY
DR
EY DR IVANHOELA
SAXON CIR
DARNAY
LA
TAPLEYLA
SPR
ING
ERS
LAG
RIF
FIN
DR
GRIFFI
NDR
MUG
GLE
TON
RD
NICHOLBYDR
NICHOLBY DR
NICHOLB
YDR
HOLBORNRD
DORKIN
GC
T
DOMBEY DR
TWIST LA
CRATCHETT RD
MCCAWBER DR
SANDY DR
SANDY DR
SHARONDR
SHADYDR
HENDRY AVEWHITEHALL CIR
VERONADR
VERO
NADR
MO
NIC
ABLVD
KLA
IRP
L
WE
ER
CIR
DELAWARE STBEECH
OAKST
ST
CHESTNUT ST
ELMWOODCEDAR
PINE
ST
ST
PR
OS
PE
CT
ST
HI G
HLA
ND
AVE
OV
ER
LOO
K
ORCHARDRD
AV
E
GIL
BER
T
LOR
RA
ING
AR
Y AV
E
AVE
AVE
CENTER CIR
CH
ALET
JACKSON
FRANKLIN
NE
WS
T
DR
AVE
AVE
HUTCHISON RD
ON
CLAIRE
PL
RMONTECIR
FARRANDDR
WE
RI C
DR
AR
TLE
YPL
EE
RIC
DR
TR
UIT
T
BRADLEY
DR
DR
ND
PLACE
OW
EN
DR
ME
LD
R
CT
GRAYLING
LAF
AYE
FENFOWA
SH
ING
TON
ST
PE
SHERMAN AVECUMMINGS CT
DOWNING LA
MAXWELLTOWN RDHENLOPEN AVE
DIAMOND ST
RED
WO
O RO
BIN
STEA
DAVE
DEC
ALB
AVELIS
TON
AVE
TRIN
ITY
AV
EFE
NW
ICK
AV
E
ROSLYN DR
AR
LEN
ED
R TARRY LALINDALE RD
TO
WN
BE
LF
WI
WINDERMERE AVE
TEDR
RE
ES
EC
T
BA
RR
RD
FE
RG
US
ON
DR
BYRD CT
DUFF CIR
AR
MO
UR
DR
PAULSON DR
D
WALKER RD
ST. JAMES
DR
PENNDREW CTGLE
NA
VON
R RE
DMON
2
LIMESTO
NE ST
AN
TO
NR
D
HARR
ISPL
PICKW
ICK
DR
TRACYCT
NC
ISS
T
NA
CT
OODMILL DR
BA
ILEY
DR
EY DR IVANHOELA
SAXON CIR
DARNAY
LA
TAPLEYLA
SPR
ING
ERS
LAG
RIF
FIN
DR
GRIFFI
NDR
MUG
GLE
TON
RD
NICHOLBYDR
NICHOLBY DR
NICHOLB
YDR
HOLBORNRD
DORKIN
GC
T
DOMBEY DR
TWIST LA
CRATCHETT RD
MCCAWBER DR
SANDY DR
SANDY DR
SHARONDR
SHADYDR
HENDRY AVEWHITEHALL CIR
VERONADR
VERO
NADR
MO
NIC
ABLVD
KLA
IRP
L
WE
ER
CIR
DELAWARE STBEECH
OAKST
ST
CHESTNUT ST
ELMWOODCEDAR
PINE
ST
ST
PR
OS
PE
CT
ST
HI G
HLA
ND
AVE
OV
ER
LOO
K
ORCHARDRD
AV
E
GIL
BER
T
LOR
RA
ING
AR
Y AV
E
AVE
AVE
CENTER CIR
CH
ALET
JACKSON
FRANKLIN
NE
WS
T
DR
AVE
AVE
HUTCHISON RD
ON
CLAIRE
PL
RMONTECIR
FARRANDDR
WE
RI C
DR
AR
TLE
YPL
EE
RIC
DR
TR
UIT
T
BRADLEY
DR
DR
ND
PLACE
OW
EN
DR
ME
LD
R
CT
GRAYLING
LAF
AYE
FENFOWA
SH
ING
TON
ST
PE
SHERMAN AVECUMMINGS CT
DOWNING LA
MAXWELLTOWN RDHENLOPEN AVE
DIAMOND ST
RED
WO
O RO
BIN
STEA
DAVE
DEC
ALB
AVELIS
TON
AVE
TRIN
ITY
AV
EFE
NW
ICK
AV
E
ROSLYN DR
AR
LEN
ED
R TARRY LALINDALE RD
TO
WN
BE
LF
WI
WINDERMERE AVE
TEDR
RE
ES
EC
T
BA
RR
RD
FE
RG
US
ON
DR
BYRD CT
DUFF CIR
AR
MO
UR
DR
PAULSON DR
D
WALKER RD
ST. JAMES
DR
PENNDREW CTGLE
NA
VON
R RE
DMON
2
LIMESTO
NE ST
AN
TO
NR
D
BR636 ON KIRKWOOD HIGHWAY (SR 2) AND BR233 ON OLD CAPITAL TRAIL
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:
BR636 - Remove the existing (broken) concrete slab from channeland place rip-rap to fill the void.
BR233 – Remove existing concrete arch and pedestrian bridgesand construct concrete arch bridge with sidewalks on the west side.The width of the new bridge will match the width of the roadwaysection at the approaches.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
BR636 – The existing concrete channel pavement is in poor condition and repair is necessaryto prevent the undermining of the bridge foundation. The bridge ranks 100th on the bridgedeficiency list.
BR233 – The bridge is structurally deficient and ranks 82nd on the bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 19,20Senatorial District: 8
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 190 0 0 0
21-071-02 100% ST 110 PE 110100% ST 50 R/W 50
80% FHWA 700 C 700
All $ X 1,000
LOC
UST
STC
ON
NE
L
BIR
DSTNANCY CT
CO
NNE
LLS
T
ST
CHANDLER
LINDEN ST
LM ST
DOCK ST
CLA
YM
ON
TS
T
YETTE BLVD
LORD ST
CURLETT ST
6TH ST
BELL ALLEY
ROUNDHOUSE LA
AVE
NU
EO
FTH
EA
RTS
WE
ST
ST
TATN
ALL
STO
RAN
GE
ST
MARSHALL ST
WA
RN
ERS
TBRO
WN
TOW
NTRU
CKROUTE
OD 7TH ST
5TH ST
2ND ST
3RD ST
FRONT ST
ROBINSON ST
PO
PLA
R
MA
WE
ST
ST
TATN
ALL
ST
OR
AN
SH
IPLE
YST
MA
RK
ETS
T
FRE
NC
HST
LOM
BAR
DS
TP
INE
ST
KIR
BEN
BU
TTO
NW
OO
DS
T
COMMERCE ST
CA
NA
LS
T
CH
RIS
TINA
AVE
LOBDEL ST
CLA
YM
ON
TS
T
PHE
ALD
WATER ST
JUS
TIS
ON
ST
MA
DISO
NST
T OAK ST
BEECH ST
JAC
KSO
N
FRA
NK
LIN
FRA
NK
LIN H
AR
RIS
ON
VAN
BU
RE
N
COLUMBIAAVE
PO
RTE
RS
T
BU
TTO
NW
OO
DS
T
TOW
NSE
NDS
T
PEARL STD ST
C ST
B ST
A ST
A ST
PEACH STAPPLE ST
BR
AD
FOR
DST
HU
RC
HS
T
EN
ST
JAMES COURT
HOWARD ST
LOM
BA
RD
ST
SPR
UC
ES
T
MA
DI S
ON
ST
SO
UTH
ST
FOU
ND
AR
YST
BEE
CH
ST
BEECH ST
OA
KS
T
STR
OU
DST
CE
DA
RS
T
5THA
VE
6THA
VE
7THA
VE
THA
VE
HORAGE ST
BROWN ST
WRIGHT ST
COLMAN ST
NCAN ST
13
13
95
LOC
UST
STC
ON
NE
L
BIR
DSTNANCY CT
CO
NNE
LLS
T
ST
CHANDLER
LINDEN ST
LM ST
DOCK ST
CLA
YM
ON
TS
T
YETTE BLVD
LORD ST
CURLETT ST
6TH ST
BELL ALLEY
ROUNDHOUSE LA
AVE
NU
EO
FTH
EA
RTS
WE
ST
ST
TATN
ALL
STO
RAN
GE
ST
MARSHALL ST
WA
RN
ERS
TBRO
WN
TOW
NTRU
CKROUTE
OD 7TH ST
5TH ST
2ND ST
3RD ST
FRONT ST
ROBINSON ST
PO
PLA
R
MA
WE
ST
ST
TATN
ALL
ST
OR
AN
SH
IPLE
YST
MA
RK
ETS
T
FRE
NC
HST
LOM
BAR
DS
TP
INE
ST
KIR
BEN
BU
TTO
NW
OO
DS
T
COMMERCE ST
CA
NA
LS
T
CH
RIS
TINA
AVE
LOBDEL ST
CLA
YM
ON
TS
T
PHE
ALD
WATER ST
JUS
TIS
ON
ST
MA
DISO
NST
T OAK ST
BEECH ST
JAC
KSO
N
FRA
NK
LIN
FRA
NK
LIN H
AR
RIS
ON
VAN
BU
RE
N
COLUMBIAAVE
PO
RTE
RS
T
BU
TTO
NW
OO
DS
T
TOW
NSE
NDS
T
PEARL STD ST
C ST
B ST
A ST
A ST
PEACH STAPPLE ST
BR
AD
FOR
DST
HU
RC
HS
T
EN
ST
JAMES COURT
HOWARD ST
LOM
BA
RD
ST
SPR
UC
ES
T
MA
DI S
ON
ST
SO
UTH
ST
FOU
ND
AR
YST
BEE
CH
ST
BEECH ST
OA
KS
T
STR
OU
DST
CE
DA
RS
T
5THA
VE
6THA
VE
7THA
VE
THA
VE
HORAGE ST
BROWN ST
WRIGHT ST
COLMAN ST
NCAN ST
13
13
95
BR688 ON SOUTH MARKET STREET OVER CHRISTINA RIVER
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This is a double leaf drawbridge which spans the Christina River. An in-depth inspection of thestructural, mechanical, and electrical systems is being conducted. Therecommendations of this inspection will be used to designimprovements to address the problems found. Repair/rehabilitationwill be funded upon completion of the inspection/design phase throughthe Bridge Preservation Program.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This bridge is functionally obsoleteand ranks 48th on the bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 3Senatorial District: 2,3
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 200 0 0 0
100% ST 200 PE 200
All $ X 1,000
EARL'S CT
ORKNEY CTBL
VD
PEOPLES DR
DA
NTRR
IS
KA
NE
DR
PATT
GELRISA CT
LOUIS CT
JOSEPH DRFLD
AN
VE
RS
CI R D
AN
VE
RS
CI R
HA
NN
AD
R
HA
NN
AD
R
HA
NN
AD
R
TORONTO CIR
PENCROSS CIR
COHANSEY CIR
W.
E.
AB
LE
DR
BROOKHILL DR
GU
LLD
R
D
DR KENMLER
RD
ND
R
RDR
SCOTTFIELD DR
DRDLDRD
GFIELDR
D
UGFIELDRD
TFIELD
RD
FIE
LDR
D
BROADFIELD
DR
BROADFIELD
DR
CAMPFIELD RD
BEL
FIELD
RD
OAKFIELD DR
OA
KFIE
LDD
R
LINFIE
LDR
D
RIC
HFIE
LDR
D
MA
PLEF
IELD
RD
PINEFIELD
RD
SCO
TTFI
ELD
TURN
DAW
SON
DRDAWSON DR
SH
EA
WA
Y
MC
MILLA
NW
AY
R
EAS T
IMB
ER
DR
N
UPLA
TAHOE CTTANA CT
LUC
ER
GENEVA CT
BURLEIGH CT
DE
ER
RU
ND
R
72
OLD BALTIMORE PIKE
GENDER RD
JOHN F. KENNEDY MEMORIAL HWY
EARL'S CT
ORKNEY CTBL
VD
PEOPLES DR
DA
NTRR
IS
KA
NE
DR
PATT
GELRISA CT
LOUIS CT
JOSEPH DRFLD
AN
VE
RS
CI R D
AN
VE
RS
CI R
HA
NN
AD
R
HA
NN
AD
R
HA
NN
AD
R
TORONTO CIR
PENCROSS CIR
COHANSEY CIR
W.
E.
AB
LE
DR
BROOKHILL DR
GU
LLD
R
D
DR KENMLER
RD
ND
R
RDR
SCOTTFIELD DR
DRDLDRD
GFIELDR
D
UGFIELDRD
TFIELD
RD
FIE
LDR
D
BROADFIELD
DR
BROADFIELD
DR
CAMPFIELD RD
BEL
FIELD
RD
OAKFIELD DR
OA
KFIE
LDD
R
LINFIE
LDR
D
RIC
HFIE
LDR
D
MA
PLEF
IELD
RD
PINEFIELD
RD
SCO
TTFI
ELD
TURN
DAW
SON
DRDAWSON DR
SH
EA
WA
Y
MC
MILLA
NW
AY
R
EAS T
IMB
ER
DR
N
UPLA
TAHOE CTTANA CT
LUC
ER
GENEVA CT
BURLEIGH CT
DE
ER
RU
ND
R
72
OLD BALTIMORE PIKE
GENDER RD
JOHN F. KENNEDY MEMORIAL HWY
BR712B, RAMP J AT I-95, SERVICE CENTER
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project willreinforce the existing rigid concrete frame with glass fiber,reinforced polymer plates and replace the existing hot-mixwith a high performance, latex modified concrete overlay.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 40th on the bridge deficiency list.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF100% ST 100 PE 100 40 40 0 0 0
90% FHWA 400 C 400
All $ X 1,000
JAMAIC
ADR
COUNTRY GATES DR
OLD
PO
ST
CT
MARK
ERD
R
BRIANS CT
RICH
ARDS
DR
WO
OD
CRO
FTST
MILL RD
HILLSIDE RD
FIRELA ERS LA
RDSH
ORLEANS RDORLEAN
MILLERS
LITT
LELA
STWIND LA
DU
RB
NA
SS
AU DR
RIVIERALA
ANDY'S CT
AN
DY
'SLA
PAP
ER
LA
TANEY LA
SMIT
HLA
DONSLA
RA
DK
ALA
THO
MAS
LA
MARKLYN
DR MARHILL
DR
PENNINGTON
DR
PENNINGTON
DR
PEN
NING
TON
DR
MAJESTICDR
MA
JESTIC
CT VALLEY AVE
MAGNOLI
ADR
MO
USLE
YPL
BEACO
NHI
LLLA
LIGHTH
OUSELA
VALLE
YA
VE
LOCUST AVE
CLEA
RVIEW
AVE
OVERLO
OKDROVERLOOK DR
WEST
DUNHILL DR
EMPIRE DR
RE
GA
LD
R
JAMAICA DR
ELMFIELD DRGRAYWOODRD
DONW
OODRD
MAPLEW
OOD
LA
KENW
YNN
RD
PAULWYNN RD
WYNWOOD RD
PATWYNN RD
CRESTFIELD RD
KIMBROUGH DR
CL
EAR
VIE
WA
VE
PIXIEBROADBENT RD
RC
HK
NO
LLR
DSTO
NEC
ROP
RD
TONBRID
GE
NO
RT
HG
ATE
RD
NORTH
GAT
BRIG
HT
SARACT
PE
NN
ING
TON
WAY
WEXFO
RD
CHANNID
ROSS OSS RD
CIN
DE
R
RO
SSC
T
ROSS CIR
RD
CREST
RD
WREXH
SONIA CT
NINAC
WA
LTE
R
SA
WMILLDR
LALOG
PH
EA
SA
NT
CIRDECATUR RD
DECATUR RD
ROSEWOOD DR
DR
IFT
WO
OD
DR
DA
CIA
DR
MORNINGSID
LARKWO O DDR
LANCASHIRE DR
CHARWOOD DRINWOOD RD
INW
OO
DR
D
SHORT DR
KIN
GS
RID
GE
DR
MARLETONDR
NTRD
RDD RD
MATWOOD
RD
LARCHWOODRD
RAMBLERRD
CANEY RDEDE
NRDLONGCOME DR
WES
TMIN
STER
DR
AROSALA
CARLTONLA
LIDOLA
COVENT
FOULK WOODS RD
ALPINE CT
DEEPWO
ODDR DEEPWOOD DR
BLACKWOODRD
LONGWOODDR
DOG
WO
OD
LA
LITTLE LEAF CT
BENTONCT
CREN
SHAW
DR
SUNNY BREA CT
CREN
SHAWLA
FAIR
BLUE
LA
AS
PIN
CT
I LA
LA
SW
EETBR
DOWNE DR
WOOD RDDIFF DR
MAPLESHADE
LA
ELMDA
LELA
BERRYWOOD
CT
GREE
NDAL
ERD
KIN
GM
AND
R
LAN
DO
ND
R
LAN
DO
ND
R
LAND
ON
DR
EATON RD
NEWTON RD
MAM
ETRD
FAIR
LEE
RDKINGMAN DRGARTH RDRAVE RD
RAVE RDBERWYN RD
BERWYN RD
KLETDR
ERSETRD
DREXEL
DRKE
NN
ED
YR
D
RIC
KD
ALE
RD
BO
DINE
DR
JUS
TINE
LA
AUSTIN AUSTIN
RD CIRBURNETT DR
ISH LA
JADE DR
ON
YX
CTITE WAY
CR
YS
TA
LC
T
OP
AL
CT
SA
PH
I RE
CT
RU
BY
DR
GA
RN
ET
P
AMETHYSTDR
BAR
LOW
RD
JESTER LA
BO
DIN
ED
R
OAKMERE RDGRANBY RD
DORVAL RD
FAIR
WO
OD
LA
LYN CT
AN
SON
RD
GREE
NSTONE
RD
LAWERNCE DR
EXTO
ND
R
BRANDYWOODDR
P
92
SILVERSIDE RD
GRUBB RD
GRUBB RD
NAAMANS RD
FOU
LKR
D
MA
RSH
RD
JAMAIC
ADR
COUNTRY GATES DR
OLD
PO
ST
CT
MARK
ERD
R
BRIANS CT
RICH
ARDS
DR
WO
OD
CRO
FTST
MILL RD
HILLSIDE RD
FIRELA ERS LA
RDSH
ORLEANS RDORLEAN
MILLERS
LITT
LELA
STWIND LA
DU
RB
NA
SS
AU DR
RIVIERALA
ANDY'S CT
AN
DY
'SLA
PAP
ER
LA
TANEY LA
SMIT
HLA
DONSLA
RA
DK
ALA
THO
MAS
LA
MARKLYN
DR MARHILL
DR
PENNINGTON
DR
PENNINGTON
DR
PEN
NING
TON
DR
MAJESTICDR
MA
JESTIC
CT VALLEY AVE
MAGNOLI
ADR
MO
USLE
YPL
BEACO
NHI
LLLA
LIGHTH
OUSELA
VALLE
YA
VE
LOCUST AVE
CLEA
RVIEW
AVE
OVERLO
OKDROVERLOOK DR
WEST
DUNHILL DR
EMPIRE DR
RE
GA
LD
R
JAMAICA DR
ELMFIELD DRGRAYWOODRD
DONW
OODRD
MAPLEW
OOD
LA
KENW
YNN
RD
PAULWYNN RD
WYNWOOD RD
PATWYNN RD
CRESTFIELD RD
KIMBROUGH DR
CL
EAR
VIE
WA
VE
PIXIEBROADBENT RD
RC
HK
NO
LLR
DSTO
NEC
ROP
RD
TONBRID
GE
NO
RT
HG
AT E
RD
NORTH
GAT
BRIG
HT
SARACT
PE
NN
ING
TON
WAY
WEXFO
RD
CHANNID
ROSS OSS RD
CIN
DE
R
RO
SSC
T
ROSS CIR
RD
CREST
RD
WREXH
SONIA CT
NINAC
WA
LTE
R
SA
WMILLDR
LALOG
PH
EA
SA
NT
CIRDECATUR RD
DECATUR RD
ROSEWOOD DR
DR
IFT
WO
OD
DR
DA
CIA
DR
MORNINGSID
LARKWO O DDR
LANCASHIRE DR
CHARWOOD DRINWOOD RD
INW
OO
DR
D
SHORT DR
KIN
GS
RID
GE
DR
MARLETONDR
NTRD
RDD RD
MATWOOD
RD
LARCHWOODRD
RAMBLERRD
CANEY RDEDE
NRDLONGCOME DR
WES
TMIN
STER
DR
AROSALA
CARLTONLA
LIDOLA
COVENT
FOULK WOODS RD
ALPINE CT
DEEPWO
ODDR DEEPWOOD DR
BLACKWOODRD
LONGWOODDR
DOG
WO
OD
LA
LITTLE LEAF CT
BENTONCT
CREN
SHAW
DR
SUNNY BREA CT
CREN
SHAWLA
FAIR
BLUE
LA
AS
PIN
CT
I LA
LA
SW
EETBR
DOWNE DR
WOOD RDDIFF DR
MAPLESHADE
LA
ELMDA
LELA
BERRYWOOD
CT
GREE
NDAL
ERD
KIN
GM
AND
R
LAN
DO
ND
R
LAN
DO
ND
R
LAND
ON
DR
EATON RD
NEWTON RD
MAM
ETRD
FAIR
LEE
RDKINGMAN DRGARTH RDRAVE RD
RAVE RDBERWYN RD
BERWYN RD
KLETDR
ERSETRD
DREXEL
DRKE
NN
ED
YR
D
RIC
KD
ALE
RD
BO
DINE
DR
JUS
TINE
LA
AUSTIN AUSTIN
RD CIRBURNETT DR
ISH LA
JADE DR
ON
YX
CTITE WAY
CR
YS
TA
LC
T
OP
AL
CT
SA
PH
I RE
CT
RU
BY
DR
GA
RN
ET
P
AMETHYSTDR
BAR
LOW
RD
JESTER LA
BO
DIN
ED
R
OAKMERE RDGRANBY RD
DORVAL RD
FAIR
WO
OD
LA
LYN CT
AN
SON
RD
GREE
NSTONE
RD
LAWERNCE DR
EXTO
ND
R
BRANDYWOODDR
P
92
SILVERSIDE RD
GRUBB RD
GRUBB RD
NAAMANS RD
FOU
LKR
D
MA
RSH
RD
GRUBB/HARVEY ROAD (N209), NAAMAN’S ROAD TO MARSH ROAD
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project primarily involves pavementrehabilitation and drainage improvements. It will also include minor intersection andpedestrian improvements, including a small section of sidewalk and pedestrian signals.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Several areas along this roadwayare experiencing drainage problems.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 7, 8, 10Senatorial District: 4, 5
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 410 0 0 0
93-061-14 100% ST 100 PE 100100% ST 250 R/W 250
80% FHWA 2,050 C 2,050
All $ X 1,000
I-95, WILMINGTON VIADUCT TO US202
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Reconstruction and rehabilitation of the existing I-95 pavement from US202 to the PA line was completed and open totraffic in October 2000. The second phase of I-95 rehabilitation is the Wilmington Viaduct Project, which will begin in FY 2003 and continue through FY 2004.The third phase to this rehabilitation involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of the pavement between the Wilmington Viaduct and US202.
An additional part of the project is the I-95 landscaping. Phase I has been planted. Phase II is in design. This work includes adding trees, shrubs, low maintenancegrasses, and enhancing the “Gateway to Delaware” at the Pennsylvania State Line.
As part of the I-95 traffic mitigation plans, additional interstate access will be provided on I-495 in Wilmington by constructing two of four missing ramp movements at theexisting US 13 interchange. The first ramp will terminate at Rogers Road from I-495 southbound and is currently under construction. The second will merge with the existingramp southbound US 13 to reach I-495 northbound.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Pavement is exhibiting signs of deterioration and must be replaced.County: New CastleProgram Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8Senatorial District: 1, 3, 4, 5, 13
EST COSTINDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,970 3,470 3,470 0
Wilmington Viaduct to US202 80% AC FHWA 3,000 PE 700 2,30090% DISC FHWA 34,700 C 17,350 17,350
Public information campaign 90% FHWA 500 INF 500100% ST 289 INF 289
Landscaping 100% ST 65 PE 6590% FHWA 200 C 200
Traffic Management Imps (TMI) 80% FHWA 1,100 PE 1,10090% FHWA 6,250 C 6,250
ITMS 80% FHWA 4,000 C 2,000 2,000
I-495 / US 13 SB Off Ramp to NB US 13 100% ST 30 PE/ENV 30100% ST 1,100 C 1,100
Churchman’s Rail Service 100% ST 1,389 1,389
All $ X 1,000
2
9
13
13
202
13
3202
48
52
495
RT PIKE
D
PENNSYLVANIA
AVE
DU
PO
NT
RD
D
THO
USEERE
WILMINGTON
2
9
13
13
202
13
3202
48
52
495
RT PIKE
D
PENNSYLVANIA
AVE
DU
PO
NT
RD
D
THO
USEERE
WILMINGTON
13
95
9A
202
13
495
PIG
EO
N
ORTPIK
E
WOOD RD
RE13
95
9A
202
13
495
PIG
EO
N
ORTPIK
E
WOOD RD
RE
I-95, WILMINGTON VIADUCT TO US202 (CONTINUED)
WILMINGTON VIADUCT TO US202 I-495 TO US 13 AND US 13 TO I-495
MEDAT
L
CTANDS
CT
TAN
DIS
HMANCHESTER
CO
NG
RE
SS
ST
TEXA
SLA
2ND ST
STE
WA
RT
ST
MERCHANT ST
MARKET ST
WHITE OAK DR
RE
DO
AK
DR
GR
EAT
OAK
DR
PIN OAK DR
OAK
LEA
FD
RACORN DR
BO
XW
OO
DLALY CT
WO
SUGAR PINE DRWHITE PINE DR
WH
ITE
BAR
KD
R
LOBL
OLL
YLA
RE
YP
INE
DR
PIN
EV
AL
LEY
DR
PIN
EV
AL
LEY
DR
PONDEROSA DR
FOXHAILDR CEDAR
CT
BRISTLE CONE DR
BLUE RIDGE DR
LEXIN
GTONDR
9PORT PENN RD PORT PENN RD
POLE BRIDGE RD
AU
GU
STIN
E
T
BAYVIEW RD
SR9,
Slop
eSt
abili
zatio
n
MEDAT
L
CTANDS
CT
TAN
DIS
HMANCHESTER
CO
NG
RE
SS
ST
TEXA
SLA
2ND ST
STE
WA
RT
ST
MERCHANT ST
MARKET ST
WHITE OAK DR
RE
DO
AK
DR
GR
EAT
OAK
DR
PIN OAK DR
OAK
LEA
FD
RACORN DR
BO
XW
OO
DLALY CT
WO
SUGAR PINE DRWHITE PINE DR
WH
ITE
BAR
KD
R
LOBL
OLL
YLA
RE
YP
INE
DR
PIN
EV
AL
LEY
DR
PIN
EV
AL
LEY
DR
PONDEROSA DR
FOXHAILDR CEDAR
CT
BRISTLE CONE DR
BLUE RIDGE DR
LEXIN
GTONDR
9PORT PENN RD PORT PENN RD
POLE BRIDGE RD
AU
GU
STIN
E
T
BAYVIEW RD
SR9,
Slop
eSt
abili
zatio
n
SR141 BASIN RD, SR273 (FRENCHTOWN ROAD) TO BURNSIDEBOULEVARD
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This concrete roadway is deteriorating due to thepresence of an alkali silica reaction (ASR) found in the concrete itself. The project will beundertaken in three parts, as outlined below.
BR680 will include the replacement of the superstructure and rehabilitationof the substructure. Additional clearance will be gained by using highperformance steel girders and fiber reinforced plastic deck panels with ahigh performance concrete overlay.
Pavement rehabilitation from SR273 to Burnside Boulevard will includereconstruction of pavement with shoulders and sidewalks. and will becompleted in two separate phases, SR273 to Jay Drive and from Jay Driveto Burnside Boulevard.
Safety improvements in the areas of SR141 North of US 13 to US 13, including WashingtonAvenue, will include the extension of Washington Avenue to SR141; and closures toPennsylvania & Delaware Avenue at SR141 and Washington Avenue at US 13.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To alleviate the ASR problem.County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 15,17,19Senatorial District: 9,12,13
EST COSTFMB ID INDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 455 3,253 3,100 0
99-071-10 BR680, US 13 and SR 141 100% ST 150 R/W 15080% FHWA 3,375 C 3,375
Pavement Reconstruction• SR273 to Jay Drive 80% FHWA 575 PE 575
80% FHWA 11,500 C 12,247
• Jay Drive to Burnside Blvd 80% FHWA 15,500 C 15,500
99-007-01 SR141, North of US 13 Delaware 100% ST 455 R/W 455Avenue to Jay Drive 90% FHWA 927 C 927
All $ X 1,000
BRACKENVILLE ROAD, SR 48 TO BARLEY MILL ROAD, SAFETY
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project will include minor widening to provide10’ travel lanes and 2’ grass shoulders. A closed drainage system and guardrail will beinstalled as part of the pavement rehabilitation.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Narrow travel lanes and safetyconcerns have been brought to the attention of the Department by areacitizens.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 12, 20Senatorial District: 6, 7
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 800 0 363 0
20-044-01 100% ST 595 LOC 295 300100% ST 272 PE 272100% ST 500 R/W 500
80% FHWA 1,816 C 1,818
All $ X 1,000
2
58
Armstrong
FrogtownCrossing
BoydsCorner
McDonough
Mt. Pleasant
Jamisons Corner
1
22
424441
429
430438
22A
428425
426
15 420
423
37
424
428
427
427
429
39
431
435
435
436
435
429
39437
437
432
43215
39
433
16
415
413
413
22
2
OLD SCHOOL HOUSE RD
PORT PE
MIT
BRID
GE
RD
BOYDS CORNER RD
DU
P
SU
MM
ITB
RID
GE
RD
RNER RD
ON
CO
RN
ER
RD
RA
TLE
DG
POLE BRIDGE RD
BAYVIEW RD
OLD CORBIT RD
CED
ARLA
NE
RD
SHALL
CRO
SSLA
KERD
MARL PIT RD
MARL PIT RD
SILVE
SILV
ERR
VANCE NECK RD
BR
ICK
MILL
RD
PE
TER
S
EMER
SO
NR
D
RD
CHURCHTOWN RD
CHURCH RD
CHOPTANK
RD
CHURCHTOWN RD
BUNKER HILL RD
BOHEMIA MILL RD 301
9299
13
71
896
1
15
15
286
ODESSA
Bridge 377
CHOPTANK ROAD (SR 15 TO N455)
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The project will widen the current 18’ travelway to 24’with additional 2’ – 5’ bicycle/pedestrian shoulders; patching and wedging 3” hot-mix overlay;realigning the approach (BR377); and realigning the intersection of N435 and N437 to createclear sight lines/distance. As part of this project it will be necessary torelocate utilities and purchase right of way for new cross-section andrealignments. The BR377 (one-lane) bridge replacement will be a separateproject.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To provide additional modes oftransportation in the US301 corridor.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 440 0 1,200 1,400
100% ST 180 ENV 180100% ST 700 PE 700100% ST 1,200 R/W 1,200
80% FHWA 7,000 C 7,000
All $ X 1,000
CHURCHMAN’S CROSSING CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:
Multi – modal Improvements
• Areawide Sidewalks / Bus Stops - Options to provide safe travelways for pedestrians and bicyclists. Improvements to bus shelters and bus pads toprovide refuge areas for transit patrons.
• Red Mill Road sidewalk – Provide for safe pedestrian movement along this busy roadway.
• Enhanced Transit Services – Purchase vehicles to provide additional bus service, including shuttles throughout the area along with a ride share matching service;guaranteed ride home program; vanpool services, flexible work program transportation management coordination; provide timetables at bus stops; and work with localemployees to promote compressed work week, staggered work hour, and preferential parking programs.
• Bus Purchase – Bus purchase for circulator routes through the corridor.
• ITMS – Enhance computerized traffic systems and other technological improvements to improve traffic flow and incident management throughout the area.
Intersection Improvements: The intersections listed below will be programmed for design and construction as conditions warrant, per the triggers recommended in theChurchman’s Crossing Study. The funding shown is timed to be available when these intersections meet the triggers. Information from on-going traffic conditions monitoringwill cause adjustments to be made.
• SR 2/SR 7 – Additional left turn lane storage capacity for Kirkwood Highway and traffic turning onto SR 7.• SR 4/SR 7 (I) – Additional left turn storage capacity for SR 4 traffic turning onto SR 7.• SR 7/SR273- Additional left turn storage capacity for SR273 traffic turning onto SR 7.• SR 273/Harmony Road – Intersection improvements to address the merging of traffic on westbound SR273 between Harmony Road and I-95.• SR 2/Harmony Road – Additional left turn storage capacity for Kirkwood Highway (SR 2) traffic turning onto SR 7.• SR 4/Harmony Road – Additional capacity on SR 4 to improve the intersection’s level of service.• SR 4/SR 7 Phase (II) – Additional capacity at intersection to support existing recorded development (JP Morgan).
95
202
1
273
4058
37
2
141
4
58
7
273
273
273
37
62
13
2
CHURCHMANS RD
TPKY
BUNKERHILL
BASIN
RD
OLD
AIRPO
RTRD
MA
NRD BOXW
GENDER
RD
GENDER RD
CHAPMAN RD
E PIKE
AP
CHRISTIANA RD
AIR
POR
TRD
OLDCHURCHMANS RD
AIR
PO
RT
RD
EA
GLE
RU
NR
D
OLD
NEWA
RKRD
KIRKWOOD HWY
RED
MILL
RD
OLDHARMONY
RD
OGLETOWN STANTON
RD
OLD
CHURCHMANS
RD
KIAMENSI RD
TELEGRAPHRD
LIME
STON
ER
D
ST
AN
TO
NR
D
WO
LLAS
TO
NR
D
HEN
DER
SO
NR
D
PIKE CREEK RD
OLD COACH RD
UP
PE
RPIK
EC
RE
EKR
D
UMPARK
RD
D
OX DEN RD MIL
LTO
W
NEW
LIN
H
A
E
FJJD
I
C
K
GB
95
202
1
273
4058
37
2
141
4
58
7
273
273
273
37
62
13
2
CHURCHMANS RD
TPKY
BUNKERHILL
BASIN
RD
OLD
AIRPO
RTRD
MA
NRD BOXW
GENDER
RD
GENDER RD
CHAPMAN RD
E PIKE
AP
CHRISTIANA RD
AIR
POR
TRD
OLDCHURCHMANS RD
AIR
PO
RT
RD
EA
GLE
RU
NR
D
OLD
NEWA
RKRD
KIRKWOOD HWY
RED
MILL
RD
OLDHARMONY
RD
OGLETOWN STANTON
RD
OLD
CHURCHMANS
RD
KIAMENSI RD
TELEGRAPHRD
LIME
STON
ER
D
ST
AN
TO
NR
D
WO
LLAS
TO
NR
D
HEN
DER
SO
NR
D
PIKE CREEK RD
OLD COACH RD
UP
PE
RPIK
EC
RE
EKR
D
UMPARK
RD
D
OX DEN RD MIL
LTO
W
NEW
LIN
H
A
E
FJJD
I
C
K
GB
CHURCHMAN’S CROSSING CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
• SR 4/Churchman’s Road – Intersection improvements to support the Churchman’s Crossing Rail Station.• SR273/Chapman Road – Intersection modification to support existing recorded development
Roadway Improvements:• Harmony Road traffic calming – Improvement(s) will be required as a result of temporary traffic rerouting through the area.• Ramp for Churchman’s Road to I-95 – Northbound access to I-95 from Churchman’s Road. This ramp will provide relief for traffic that accesses I-95 via a one lane
loop ramp.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: These projects are the beginning of the implementation phase for the Churchman’s Crossing Study.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System Management
Representative District: 18, 19, 21Senatorial District: 9, 11
CHURCHMAN’S CROSSING CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)INDIVIDUAL PROJECT EST COSTSEGMENTS FUNDING TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 4,966 3,392 1,940 2,080
Churchmans Crossing Imp’s 80% FHWA 8,982 582 500 1,500 6,400100% ST 5,777 3,000 1,377 600 800
Program Management 100% ST 775 MGT 325 250 200
Multi – Modal Improvements
• Areawide Sidewalks/Bus Stops 100% ST 386 PE 36 350100% ST 180 R/W 80 100
80% FHWA 7,166 C 1,166 3,000 3,000
• Red Mill Road Sidewalk 80% FHWA 458 C 458
• Enhance Transit Service 100% ST 450 PRO 450
• Bus Purchase 100% ST 300 PRO 300ITMS 100% ST 300 PE 150 150
80% FHWA 2,000 C 1,000 1,000Intersections• SR 2/SR 7 100% ST 107 PE 107
80% FHWA 780 C 780• SR 4/SR 7 (Phase I) 100% ST 292 PE 292
100% ST 325 R.W 32580% FHWA 960 C 960
• SR273/Harmony Road 100% ST 140 PE 14080% FHWA 700 C 700
• SR 2/Harmony Road 100% ST 300 PE 30080% FHWA 1,500 C 1,500
• SR 4/Harmony Road 100% ST 500 PE 50080% FHWA 2,500 C 2,500
• SR 4/SR 7 (Phase II) 100% ST 300 PE 30080% FHWA 1,500 C 1,500
• SR 4/Churchman’s Road 100% ST 400 PE 40080% FHWA C*
• SR273/Chapman Road 100% ST 400 PE 40080% FHWA 2,000 C 2,000
Roadway Improvements• Harmony Road Traffic Calming 80% FHWA 444 C 444
• Ramp Churchman’s Road to I-95 100% ST 500 PE 390 11080% FHWA 2,500 C 2,500
Other Areawide Improvements• Churchman’s Road / SR 7 100% ST 650 R/W 650
ODESSA
MIDDLETOWN
OLD SCHOOL HOUSE RD
PORTP ENN RDPORT PEN N RD
SUM
MIT
BRIDG
ER
D
BOYDS CORNER RD
SUM
MIT
BRIDG
ER
D
LEV
ELS
RD
DU
PO
NT
PAR
KW
AY
NOXONTOWN
RD
SU
MM
ITB
RID
GE
RD
LOREW
OOD
GRO
VERD
HYETTS CORN ER R D
JAM
ISO
NC
OR
NE
RR
D
RA
T LE
DGE
RD
THORNTOWN RD
POLE BRIDGE RD
AU
GU
STI
NER
D
ST
BAYVIEW RD
OLD CORBIT RD
SILV
ER
RU
NRD
CED
ARLA
NE
RD SH
ALLC
RO
SSLA
KERD
MARL PIT RD
MARL PI T RD
BETHEL CHURCH RD
BOHEMIA MILL RD
MI DDLETOWN
WARWICK RD
MIDD
LENE
CK
RD
STANNSCHURCH
RD
TAYLO
RS
BR
IDGE
RD
STAVES LANDING RD
HA
MM
OND
RD
MP RD
FIELDSBORO RD
OLD
STA
TERD
NOXONTOWN
R D
THOMAS LA ND INGRD
SIL VER
LA
KE
RD
SILVE
RR
UN
RD
VANCE N ECK RD
BRI C
KM
I LLR
D
PE
TER
SON
RD
EM
ERS
ON
RD
RD
WIG
GIN
SM
ILLRD
BUNKER HI LL RD
CHURCH TOWN RD
BETHEL CHURCH RD
C HESAPEAKE CITY RD
LR
D
CHOPT
ANK
RD
CHURCHTOWN RD
DUTC
HN
ECK
RD
896
301
9
9
301
301
299
299
299
13
15
71
896
1
15
15
286
SR
1SR
1S
R1
SR 1
SR 1
SR 1
SR 1
ODESSA
MIDDLETOWN
OLD SCHOOL HOUSE RD
PORTP ENN RDPORT PEN N RD
SUM
MIT
BRIDG
ER
D
BOYDS CORNER RD
SUM
MIT
BRIDG
ER
D
LEV
ELS
RD
DU
PO
NT
PAR
KW
AY
NOXONTOWN
RD
SU
MM
ITB
RID
GE
RD
LOREW
OOD
GRO
VERD
HYETTS CORN ER R D
JAM
ISO
NC
OR
NE
RR
D
RA
T LE
DGE
RD
THORNTOWN RD
PO LE BRIDG E RD
AU
GU
STI
NER
D
ST
BAYVIEW RD
OLD CORBIT RD
SILV
ER
RU
NRD
CED
ARLA
NE
RD SH
ALLC
RO
SSLA
KERD
MARL PIT RD
MA RL PI T R D
BETHEL CHURCH RD
BOHEMIA MILL RD
MI DDLETOWN
WARWICK RD
MIDD
LENE
CK
RD
STANNSCHURCH
RD
TAYLO
RS
BR
IDGE
RD
STAVES LANDING RD
HA
MM
OND
RD
MP RD
FIELDSBORO RD
OLD
STA
TERD
NOXONTOWN
R D
THOMAS LA ND INGRD
SIL VER
LA
KE
RD
SILVE
RR
UN
RD
VANCE N ECK RD
BRI C
KM
I LLR
D
PE
TER
SON
RD
EM
ERS
ON
RD
RD
WIG
GIN
SM
ILLRD
BUNKER HI LL RD
CHURCH TOWN RD
BETHEL CHURCH RD
C HESAPEAKE CITY RD
LR
D
CHOPT
ANK
RD
CHURCHTOWN RD
DUTC
HN
ECK
RD
896
301
9
9
301
301
299
299
299
13
15
71
896
1
15
15
286
SR
1SR
1S
R1
SR 1
SR 1
SR 1
SR 1
SOUTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY IMPROVEMENTSPROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The US 301 Major Investment Studyencompasses the area from the Maryland line to US 13, and from I-95 to the area justsouth of Middletown. The study is complete and has been adopted by WILMAPCO.Options have been narrowed to multi-modal packages of improvements/expansions(transit, pedestrian, bike, minor and major roadways). The final selected package ofimprovements will be phased in over the next 20+ years and, depending on the alternativechosen, may include major road capacity increases. These couldrange from dualization of existing US301 and SR896 (south ofC&D canal) to a new four lane limited access highway between theMaryland line and SR 1-95, in addition to minor and majorroadway expansion projects north of the C&D canal. Anenvironmental impact statement will be prepared over the nextthree years, with subsequent review, coordination, and agreementswith federal/state agencies, leading to location, design, andpossible funding through the System Expansion Program. Fundingis available within this project allocation for improvements to thesecondary road system in Southern New Castle County, the first ofwhich is Choptank Road as noted on a page in the System Management section.Additional secondary road improvements will be identified through a joint studyconducted by New Castle County and the Department and funded under this project.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To develop projects identified through the US301 MajorInvestment Study; the local roads plan being developed jointly by DelDOTand New Castle County; and economic development efforts to bring jobssouth of the C&D canal.
County: New CastleMunicipality: MiddletownProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 9Senatorial District: 14
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 900 3,160 5,388
100% ST 80 PR 80100% ST 1,400 R/W 1,400100% ST 2,400 C 2,400
80% FHWA 49,740 C 7,000 15,000 26,940
SR 41 (LANCASTER PIKE) YORKLYN ROAD TO VALLEY ROAD
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: An extensive community involvement process, refinedthe plan developed by WILMAPCO to address current traffic and pedestrian safety issues alongthe corridor extending from north of Valley Road to near School House Road. The planincludes installation of auxiliary turn lanes, channelization, restriping,crosswalks, possible street lighting and other aesthetic enhancements, andcould require additional right-of-way. (See the Program DevelopmentSection of this document for additional planning schedule.)
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: In 1997, the Highway SafetyImprovement Program identified the need for roadway and intersectionimprovements to correct recurringaccident conditions in the corridor.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 20Senatorial District: 6
FMB ID EST COST CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR FUNDING TO COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJPROJ # IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 360 1,000 1,260 020-007-02 100% ST 125 LOC/ENV 125
100% ST 735 PE 250 485100% ST 1,000 R/W 1,000
80% FHWA 6,300 C 6,300
All $ X 1,000
896
896
4
22BR
CHESTNUT HILL RD
GENDER
RD
GEND
KENNEDY MEMORIAL HWY
OLD
NEWARK
RD
CH
AP
EL
ST
EX
T
WYOMING RD
NUT HILL RD
E
896
896
4
22BR
CHESTNUT HILL RD
GENDER
RD
GEND
KENNEDY MEMORIAL HWY
OLD
NEWARK
RD
CH
AP
EL
ST
EX
T
WYOMING RD
NUT HILL RD
E
SR896 AND SR 4 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, NEWARK
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Planned improvements include the channelization oftraffic and restriping for additional/longer left turning lanes at this major intersection.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project was identified through theDepartment’s Project Development Committee for inclusion in the CIP.
County: New CastleMunicipality: NewarkProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 11Senatorial District: 4, 6
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 32 34 0 0
100% ST 32 PE 3280% FHWA 170 C 170
All $ X 1,000
40
DU
PO
NT
PKY
OLD PORTER RD
REDLIO
NCHURCH
RD RED LION RD
BE
AR
CO
RB
ITT
RD
CARLO RDWE
LLI NG
T ON
DR
BUS . CT
T
COUNTRY WOODS DR
TIMBER
KNOLL
DR
HERONGREENCT
LA
LINDEN
SPRING
CT
HEATHERLOFT
GR
OVE M
AN
SIO
NW
AY
N
DRM
ITE
TIAK
LAKETA
HOE
CIR
LAKE
AR
DR
REM
O
.
SABRINACIR.
NA
PLE
WA
Y
BO
NO
RVA
CT.
I DR.LI CT.
COUNCILCIR
.
HUNTERDR.
E.
FIELDSTONERD
SK
YA
S HE N
CT
MO
OR
S
CT
WILDFIELD
CT
RUSHES DR
MO
ATCT
RDHE
CRO
YDE
NR
DD
ARW
INR
DAN
DRE
ARD
CY
NTHIA
RD
CASSAN RD
DAVID PL JAMES
CT
EDWARCT
CLAIRMONT DR
SMITHLA
GARWOOD DR
GLO
RIA
CT
TOLHAM DR
MOORES DR
REGAL BLVD
CA
STLE
RUN
CO
T TA
GE
CT
FIE
LDS
T ON
EC
T
KIN
GS
CR
OF
TD
R
KIN GS CROFT DR
KINGSTON DR
N.
S.
RE
GA
LC
T
RA
WL I
NG
SD
R
GAY
NO
RC
T
VE L
LA ND
R
MEADOW KNOLL CTJANSSEN CT
ABB
EY
CTDORIS
CT
PIGEON
RUNDR
PIGEON RUN DR
GODR
ERON
CT
HOBKIRKAY
BOR
NC
T
HAMPTON
CT
TEAL CIRBRO
OKM
ONT
DR
KEMPER
DRDRRAVEN
TURN
EGRETC
T
LOVER
CIR
SCOTLANDDR
LIVERP
KYLE ST
JOYCELYN
INGRAM
HYDE PARK
GARNET ST
FREDERICK ST
EDINBURGH
DAN ST
CADAGAN
BURBANK
ALBERT ST
GLAS
GOWD
R
N. PATRICE
DR
QUINCE
DR
REGEN
TDR
SOPHIADR
TRUDY
DR
N. OXFO
RDDR
BRADLEY
DR
ERIVERS
DR
GU
40
DU
PO
NT
PKY
OLD PORTER RD
REDLIO
NCHURCH
RD RED LION RD
BE
AR
CO
RB
ITT
RD
CARLO RDWE
LLI NG
T ON
DR
BUS . CT
T
COUNTRY WOODS DR
TIMBER
KNOLL
DR
HERONGREENCT
LA
LINDEN
SPRING
CT
HEATHERLOFT
GR
OVE M
AN
SIO
NW
AY
N
D RM
ITE
TIAK
LAKETA
HOE
CIR
LAKE
AR
DR
REM
O
.
SABRINACIR.
NA
PLE
WA
Y
BO
NO
RVA
CT.
I DR.LI CT.
COUNCILCIR
.
HUNTERDR.
E.
FIELDSTONERD
SK
YA
S HE N
CT
MO
OR
S
CT
WILDFIELD
CT
RUSHES DR
MO
ATCT
RDHE
CRO
YDE
NR
DD
A RW
INR
DAN
DRE
ARD
CY
NTHIA
RD
CASSAN RD
DAVID PL JAMES
CT
EDWARCT
CLAIRMONT DR
SMITHLA
GARWOOD DR
GLO
RIA
CT
TOLHAM DR
MOORES DR
REGAL BLVD
CA
STLE
RUN
CO
T TA
GE
CT
FIE
LDS
T ON
EC
T
KIN
GS
CR
OF
TD
R
KIN GS CROFT DR
KINGSTON DR
N.
S.
RE
GA
LC
T
RA
WL I
NG
SD
R
GAY
NO
RC
T
VE L
LA ND
R
MEADOW KNOLL CTJANSSEN CT
ABB
EY
CTDORIS
CT
PIGEON
RUNDR
PIGEON RUN DR
GODR
ERON
CT
HOBKIRKAY
BOR
NC
T
HAMPTON
CT
TEAL CIRBRO
OKM
ONT
DR
KEMPER
DRDRRAVEN
TURN
EGRETC
T
LOVER
CIR
SCOTLANDDR
LIVERP
KYLE ST
JOYCELYN
INGRAM
HYDE PARK
GARNET ST
FREDERICK ST
EDINBURGH
DAN ST
CADAGAN
BURB ANK
ALBERT ST
GLAS
GOWD
R
N. PATRICE
DR
QUINCE
DR
REGEN
TDR
SOPHIADR
TRUDY
DR
N. OXFO
RDDR
BRADLEY
DR
ERIVERS
DR
GU
40
7
DU
P
OLD PORTER RD
RED
LION
CHU
RCHR
D RED LIO
COUN
BE
AR
CO
RB
ITT
RD
SU
NS
ET
LAK
ER
D
REYBOLD RDOLD HAMBURG
WR
BA
C
D
40
7
DU
PO
NT
OLD PORTER RD
RED
LION
CHU
RCHR
D RED LION R
COUN
BE
AR
CO
RB
ITT
RD
SU
NS
ET
LAK
ER
D
REYBOLD RDOLD HAMBURG RD
WR
BA
C
D
US 40, MARYLAND LINE TO US 13, CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCOPE: This project seeks to implement the recommendations of the Route 40 Steering Committee, a public group that has recommendedtransportation improvements for the next twenty years to address planned growth and enhance the quality of life in the Route 40 Corridor. The Committee’srecommendations are found in The Route 40 Corridor 20-Year Transportation Plan dated June 19, 2000.
The projects listed below represent the first phase of improvements recommended by the Plan. These projects will be closely tied to an ongoing travelmonitoring program through the Route 40 Corridor Monitoring Committee (CMC), which has been charged to implement the recommendations of the Plan.Triggered projects will not be constructed until changing conditions dictate in order to avoid creating excess capacity and inducing additional development andtraffic in the corridor. Conceptual Engineering and Environmental Documentation of large projects proposed for later phases are also beginning in FY2001 tofacilitate implementation in the later years of the program and preserve needed right of way.
Intersection ImprovementsA. US 40/Walther Road (Short Term) – Addition of a southbound right turn lane to address existing capacity problems.B. US 40/Governors Square/Glendale Connector – Improvements at the intersection to provide southbound double left
turn lanes, and one right turn lane, plus northbound double left turn lanes, one through lane, and right turn lane.This improvement is tied to Eden Square Connector needs.
C. US 40/SR 72 – Addition of northbound and southbound through lanes, and eastbound and westbound left turn lanesto provide double lefts.
D. SR 72/Del Laws – Realignment of the intersection to align with the proposed entrance to the Rickey CommerceCenter.
Roadway ImprovementsE. Church Road, US 40 to Queensbury Village I - Improvements will include two travel lanes, bike lanes,
sidewalks, and railroad crossing devices. Improvements to the intersection of Church Road and US 40 willprovide additional turn lanes and pedestrian signals, as well as additional lighting. This project includesprivate developer contributions.
40
DU
PON
TPK
Y
OLD PORTER RD
REDLIO
NCHURCH
RD RED LION RD
CO
BE
AR
CO
RB
ITT
RD
SU
NS
ET
LAK
ER
D
LD HAMBURG RD
G
F
40
DU
PON
TPK
Y
OLD PORTER RD
REDLIO
NCHURCH
RD RED LION RD
CO
BE
AR
CO
RB
ITT
RD
SU
NS
ET
LAK
ER
D
LD HAMBURG RD
G
FUS 40, MARYLAND LINE TO US 13, CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
New RoadwaysF. Eden Square Connector – Construct road from SR 7, south of Eden Square Shopping Center to relieve
congestion at US 40/SR 7 intersection and improve accessibility.G. Rue Madora Drive – Connection to two existing sections of Rue Madora Drive behind the Fox Run Shopping
Center to improve local mobility.
Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements- US40, SR72 to Appleby Road – Sidewalks, crosswalks, minor intersectionimprovements and signal modifications to address existing transportation problems at various locations throughoutthe US 40 Corridor. Specific locations and plans include:H. Songsmith Drive Sidewalks, McMullen Circle to Smalleys Dam Road.I. US40 Sidepaths, Church Rd to SR1 – 10’ foot wide combined pedestrian/bicycle paths along both sides of Route 40.J. US40 Sidepaths, Salem Church Rd to Church Road.K. Wilton Blvd and Appleby Road Sidewalks.L. US40 Sidepaths, SR72 to Salem Church Road.M. Old Baltimore Pike Sidepath, SR72 to SR273 – 10’ foot wide combined pedestrian/bicycle path along one side of Old Baltimore Pike.N. SR72 Sidewalks, US40 to SR71 – Addition of sidewalks along both sides of SR72. Tied to a long term needs planning study of SR72.O. Walther Road Sidewalks, Old Baltimore Pike to US40.
Transit Service Enhancements –P. Waterford Pedestrian Access – ADA accessible access to the bus stop on US40 from Waterford I to include a ramp system over the berm, lighting, and other security
features.Q. Additional Pedestrian Connection to Bus Stops – Sidewalk connections to bus stops throughout the corridor.R. Bus Purchase – Purchase vehicles to provide additional transit services throughout the corridor.S. Additional Bus Stop Improvements – Additional bus shelters at selected locations throughout the corridor.T. Park and Ride Preservation/Expansion – Preservation of existing lots in the corridor (People’s Plaza and SR7/SR273) and consideration of new ones (near both the
SR72/US40 area and US40/SR7 areas.)U. Route Deviation Service – Funding of a pilot project for route deviation transit services as an extension of neighborhood transit services program.
Other ImprovementsV. US40 Signing and Streetscape Master Plan – Enhanced signage and streetscaping in the corridor. Construction of signage is scheduled for FY2002. Implementation of
streetscaping scheduled for FY2005-2007W. Access Management on Developing Properties – Coordination through NCC’s land development process to reduce the number of new access points on Route 40.X. US40 Streetscaping – Implementation of Streetscape Master Plan.
US 40, MARYLAND LINE TO US 13, CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:County: New CastleProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 15, 17, 24, 26, 27Senatorial District: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
EST COSTINDIVIDUAL PROJECT TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007SEGMENTS FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 8,751 6,681 11,150 4,190US 40 Planning & Prelim Eng. 80% FHWA 4,185 PE 2,270 1,915
100% ST 6,303 PE 3,502 1,516 1,285
US 40 Right of Way 100% ST 17,793 R/W 2,157 4,006 4,475 6,065 1,090
IntersectionsA. US 40 / Walther Rd (Short Term) 100% ST 46 PE 46
80% FHWA 304 C 304
B. US 40/Gov Sq.Glendale Conn. 100% ST 77 PE 7780% FHWA 516 C 516
C. US 40/ SR 72 80% FHWA 862 C 862
D. SR 72 / DeLaws Road 80% FHWA 552 C 552
Roadway ImprovementsE. Church Road, US 40 to Queensbury 80% FHWA 4,463 C 4,463
New RoadwaysF. Eden Square Connector 80% FHWA 203 PE 203
Other/FHWA 1,350 C 1,350
G. Rue Madora 100% ST 50 PE 5080% FHWA 334 C 334
Bicycle/Pedestrian ImprovementsH. Songsmith Drive Sidewalks 80% FHWA 156 PE 156
80% FHWA 1,040 C 1,040
I. Sidepaths, Church Rd to SR1 80% FHWA 2,623 C 2,623
J. Sidepaths, Salem Church to Church Rd. 80% FHWA 895 C 895
US 40, MARYLAND LINE TO US 13, CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
EST COSTINDIVIDUAL PROJECT TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007SEGMENTS FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
K. Wilton Blvd./Appleby Rd. Sidewalks 80% FHWA 1,733 C 1,733
L. Sidepaths, SR 72 to Salem Church Rd. 80% FHWA 1,887 C 1,887
M. Sidepaths, Old Balt Pike, SR 72 to SR273 80% FHWA 392 PE 39280% FHWA 2,613 C 2,613
N. SR 72 Sidewalks, US 40 to SR 71 80% FHWA 3,157 C 3,157
O. Walther Rd Sidewalks, OBP to US 40 80% FHWA 1,635 C 1,635
Transit Improvements
P. Waterford Pedestrian Access 100% ST 20 PE 2080% FHWA 135 C 135
Q. Additional Pedestrian Connections to Stops 100% ST 34 PE 3480% FHWA 225 C 225
R. Bus Purchase 100% ST 300 PRO 300
S. Additional Bus Stop Improvements 100% ST 68 PE 6880% FHWA 450 C 450
T. Park – n – Ride Preservation/Expansion 100% ST 900 C 900
U. Route Deviation Service 100% ST 1,550 TR 1,550
Other ImprovementsV. US 40 Signing and Streetscape Master Plan 100% ST 90 PE 90
100% ST 290 C 290
W. Access Management on Developing Properties 100% ST 50 PE 5080% FHWA 680 C 680
X. US 40 Streetscape 80% FHWA 2,200 C 2,200
All $ X 1,000
WILMINGTON TRAFFIC CALMING AND PEDESTRIAN/TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS
A. Fourth Street, Walnut Street to I-95– Fourth St. is an important vehicular and transit route. The goal is to improve pedestrian safety of the four-laneroadway and create a transit-friendly environment by constructing bus shelters, improving striping and crosswalks locations, and re-constructing sidewalks.Improve signalization will also be done as part of the project.
B. Delaware Ave. Monroe Street to Walnut Street - The goals of this project include better vehicle circulation and enhanced pedestrian amenities. This willbe done through the re-alignment of lanes; restiping so that lane assignments are clear; establishing two-way traffic on 10th St. below Shipley; and re-constructing sidewalks with lighting and street trees.
C. King and Orange, MLK to 13th Street – These streets are the major corridors in Wilmington's central business district. It is the project's goal to greatlyimprove the transit rider’s experience, thereby increasing usage. This will be done by installing state-of-the art bus shelters; making sidewalk and crosswalkimprovements; and providing better lighting and streetscaping.
D. / E. Market Street, Phase II (MLK Blvd. to 9th Street and 11th Street to 16th Street) and Market Street (9th Street to 11th Street) - These projects will re-introducevehicles to this area and allow for parking along Wilmington's main spine in the central business district to aid in the economic re-development of the area. Pedestrian andstreetscaping enhancements are also part of the project. The project will also be consistent with the plan to build a steel wheel trolley along the length of Market St.
F. Walnut Street, MLK to 16th Street – Walnut St. is a major inbound route to the central business district. This project will improve its function by enhancing the roadwaygeometry (re-striping and re-assignment of lanes) as well as provide for safe pedestrian and transit uses. It's design will be consistent with the adjacent Wilmington CenterIII project.
G. Signalization - This project includes the upgrading of the existing traffic control system along major arterials with demand-activated, computer-controlled signals forimproved circulation, as well as upgrading signals citywide with new stanchions and signals to bring them to state-of-the-art levels for improved performance and safety.Signals will provide priority cycling for buses and a pre-empt for emergency vehicles. The existing sidewalks will be modified to meet ADA requirements at signalizedintersections.
H. US202 Broom Street to I-95 - Includes channelization and creation of a “boulevard” on US202 south of I-95 heading into Wilmington.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The projects will improve the intermodal environment between city neighborhoods and employment centers; create safer vehicular/pedestrianenvironment; and improve the visual appearance of the streets.
202
LOC
US
TS
T
SHEARMAN ST
BIR
DSTNANCY CT
ST
CHANDLER
LM ST
LAFAYETTE BLVD
LORD ST
CURLETT ST
6TH ST
BELL ALLEY
ROUNDHOUSE LA
FTH
EA
RT
S
TST TA
TNA
LLST
ALM
ERR
OW
VAN RACE ST HU
T
BU
EN
AV
I S JES
ST
RO
DN
EYST
14TH ST
14TH ST
13TH ST
13TH ST
MCCAULEY ST
8TH ST
8TH ST
7TH ST
7TH ST
10TH ST
10TH ST
9TH ST
9TH ST
12TH ST
6TH ST
6TH ST
5TH ST
5TH ST
2ND ST
ST
3RD ST
3RD ST
ROBINSONAR
MO
NR
OE
ST
MA
DIS
ON
ST
MA
DIS
ON
ST
JEFF
ER
SO
NS
T
WE
ST
ST
WE
ST
ST
CH
AMBE
RLI
N
TATN
ALL
ST
TATN
ALL
ST
OR
AN
GE
ST
OR
AN
GE
STC
HIP
PEY
ST
SH
IPLE
YS
T
SH
IPL
EY
ST
BAS
SET
TS
T
MA
RK
ET
ST
MA
RK
ET
ST
FRE
NC
HST
FRE
NC
HST
LOM
BAR
DS
T
GU
YE
RA
VE
PIN
ES
T
KIR
KWO
OD
ST
BEN
NE
TTST
BU
TTO
NW
OO
DS
T
DECATUR ST
T
PHE
ALD
LOC
UST
CHU
RCH
PIN
EJESS
UP
SPRU
13TH
17
22ND
STST
MAB
EL16TH
ST
PO
PLA
R
ST
JUS
TIS
ON
ST
MA
DIS
ON
ST
ST
CH
ERR
YS
T
JAC
KSO
N
AD
AM
S
KIRKAVE
ST
NB
UR
EN
ST
ST
PLEASANT ST
PO
RTE
RS
T
ST
SO
UTH
S
FO
U
BE
EC
A.
A.
A.
B
C
C
CC
B
D
E
F
F
202
LOC
US
TS
T
SHEARMAN ST
BIR
DSTNANCY CT
ST
CHANDLER
LM ST
LAFAYETTE BLVD
LORD ST
CURLETT ST
6TH ST
BELL ALLEY
ROUNDHOUSE LA
FTH
EA
RT
S
TST TA
TNA
LLST
ALM
ERR
OW
VAN RACE ST HU
T
BU
EN
AV
I S JES
ST
RO
DN
EYST
14TH ST
14TH ST
13TH ST
13TH ST
MCCAULEY ST
8TH ST
8TH ST
7TH ST
7TH ST
10TH ST
10TH ST
9TH ST
9TH ST
12TH ST
6TH ST
6TH ST
5TH ST
5TH ST
2ND ST
ST
3RD ST
3RD ST
ROBINSONAR
MO
NR
OE
ST
MA
DIS
ON
ST
MA
DIS
ON
ST
JEFF
ER
SO
NS
T
WE
ST
ST
WE
ST
ST
CH
AMBE
RLI
N
TATN
ALL
ST
TATN
ALL
ST
OR
AN
GE
ST
OR
AN
GE
STC
HIP
PEY
ST
SH
IPLE
YS
T
SH
IPL
EY
ST
BAS
SET
TS
T
MA
RK
ET
ST
MA
RK
ET
ST
FRE
NC
HST
FRE
NC
HST
LOM
BAR
DS
T
GU
YE
RA
VE
PIN
ES
T
KIR
KWO
OD
ST
BEN
NE
TTST
BU
TTO
NW
OO
DS
T
DECATUR ST
T
PHE
ALD
LOC
UST
CHU
RCH
PIN
EJESS
UP
SPRU
13TH
17
22ND
STST
MAB
EL16TH
ST
PO
PLA
R
ST
JUS
TIS
ON
ST
MA
DIS
ON
ST
ST
CH
ERR
YS
T
JAC
KSO
N
AD
AM
S
KIRKAVE
ST
NB
UR
EN
ST
ST
PLEASANT ST
PO
RTE
RS
T
ST
SO
UTH
S
FO
U
BE
EC
A.
A.
A.
B
C
C
CC
B
D
E
F
F
202
FERNWOOD
ST
MONROE
STST
PL
ST
STST
ST
JEFFERSON
FRANKLIN
HARRISON
VANBUREN
ST
ST
COLE
RID
GEBYR
ON
OVER
LY
LONDON
RU
RD
RD
LA
ED ERSE
TRD
RD
ALAPOCASDR
NORTH
PARK
STA
DIU
M
DR
STADIUM
DR
PARK
24TH23RD
22ND
19TH
21ST
20 TH
MC
CAABE
AVEMONROE
MADISON
25TH
26TH26TH
27TH
2 8TH
29TH
STSTST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
STO
NE
TOWER
LA
CA
RL
RD
CANTERA
STONE HILL
RD
GRANITE RD
SCHOOL
RD
BROOM PL
FRANKLINPL
VANBUREN
BAR
RETT
BAR
RETT
ST
30TH
31ST
32ND34TH
33RD
35TH
36TH
37TH
38TH
3SSST
ST
ST
STST
ST
ST TO
DDSLA
EA
CRESTON PLZEBLEY PL
MADISON
HH
202
FERNWOOD
ST
MONROE
STST
PL
ST
STST
ST
JEFFERSON
FRANKLIN
HARRISON
VANBUREN
ST
ST
COLE
RID
GEBYR
ON
OVER
LY
LONDON
RU
RD
RD
LA
ED ERSE
TRD
RD
ALAPOCASDR
NORTH
PARK
STA
DIU
M
DR
STADIUM
DR
PARK
24TH23RD
22ND
1 9TH
21ST
20 TH
MC
CAABE
AVEMONROE
MADISON
25TH
26TH26TH
27TH
2 8TH
29TH
STSTST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
STO
NE
TOWER
LA
CA
RL
RD
CANTERA
STONE HILL
RD
GRANITE RD
SCHOOL
RD
BROOM PL
FRANKLINPL
VANBUREN
BAR
RETT
BAR
RETT
ST
30TH
3 1ST
32ND34TH
33RD
35TH
36TH
37TH
38TH
3SSST
ST
ST
STST
ST
ST TO
DDSLA
EA
CRESTON PLZEBLEY PL
MADISON
HH
WILMINGTON TRAFFIC CALMING AND PEDESTRIAN/TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
County: New CastleMunicipality: WilmingtonProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Senatorial District: 2, 3
WILMINGTON TRAFFIC CALMING AND PEDESTRIAN/TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
EST COSTINDIVIDUAL PROJECT TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007SEGMENTS FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 193 1,063 0 875
A. 4th Street , Downtown 100% ST 50 PD 50Wilmington 700 PE 700
FHWA 2,800 C 2,800
B. Delaware Ave., Monroe St. to Walnut St. 100% ST 30 PD 30Wilmington 170 PE 170
FHWA 2,400 C 2,400
C. King & Orange Sts – MLK to 13th St 80% FHWA 95 PD 9580% FHWA 600 PE 60080% FHWA 3,000 C 3,000
D. Market Street – (Phase II) MLK to to 9th St. 100% ST 50 PD 5011th St. to 16th St. Wilmington 420 PE 420
FHWA 1,680 C 1,680
E. Market Street – 9th to 11th St. Wilmington 360 PE 360FHWA 1,800 C 1,800
F. Walnut Street, MLK to 16th St. 100% ST 54 PD 54Wilmington 340 PE 340
FHWA 1,700 C 1,700
G. Signalization 100% FHWA 1,207 PE 1,114 93100% FHWA 12,203 C 7,559 2,394 2,250
H. US202, Broom Street to I-95 100% ST 363 PE 363100% ST 111 R/W 111
80% FHWA 3,821 C 3,821
All $ X 1,000
BIR
DSTNANCY CT
BELL ALLEY
ROUNDHOUSE LA
AVE
NU
EO
FTH
EA
RT
S
WE
ST
ST
TATN
ALL
STO
RA
NG
ES
T
MARSHALL ST
WA
RN
ERS
BROW
NTOWN
TRU
CK
ROUTE
2ND ST
3RD ST
ROBINSON S
PO
PLA
R
MA F
WATER ST
JUS
TI
MA
DI
OAK ST
BEECH STFRA
NK
FRA
NK
COLUMBIAAVE
BU
TTO
N
A STHOWARD ST LO
MBA
RD
ST
SPR
UC
EST
MA
DIS
ON
ST
SO
UTH
ST
FOU
ND
ARY
ST
BEE
CH
ST
BEECH ST
OAK
STSTR
OU
DS
T
CE
DA
RS
T
5THAV
E
6THAV
E
E ST
BROWN ST
WRIGHT ST
COLMAN ST
ABC
ED
F
H
I
I
G
BIR
DSTNANCY CT
BELL ALLEY
ROUNDHOUSE LA
AVE
NU
EO
FTH
EA
RT
S
WE
ST
ST
TATN
ALL
STO
RA
NG
ES
T
MARSHALL ST
WA
RN
ERS
BROW
NTOWN
TRU
CK
ROUTE
2ND ST
3RD ST
ROBINSON S
PO
PLA
R
MA F
WATER ST
JUS
TI
MA
DI
OAK ST
BEECH STFRA
NK
FRA
NK
COLUMBIAAVE
BU
TTO
N
A STHOWARD ST LO
MBA
RD
ST
SPR
UC
EST
MA
DIS
ON
ST
SO
UTH
ST
FOU
ND
ARY
ST
BEE
CH
ST
BEECH ST
OAK
STSTR
OU
DS
T
CE
DA
RS
T
5THAV
E
6THAV
E
E ST
BROWN ST
WRIGHT ST
COLMAN ST
ABC
ED
F
H
I
I
G
WILMINGTON RIVERFRONT / TRANSIT CENTER
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:
A. Wilmington Transit Center, Market Street toWalnut Street– The goal of this project is toprovide better circulation for cars and buses aswell as provide for safer pedestrian connections.This will be done through removal of the WalnutSt. "sweep", making Market St. two-way south ofMLK, Jr. Blvd; improved crosswalks; betterlighting and better directional signage. This areais important as it is the hub of transportationactivity in the city.
B. Wilmington Transit Center – Bus StagingArea Facility – This staging facility encouragesmulti-modal transportation in the area due to itsproximity to the train station and other pedestrianlinks.
C. Water Street, Shipley Street to West Street -Water street improvements are needed to linknewly completed S. Madison and West St. to therecently completed Tubman-Garrett Park andTransit Center areas. Water Street also fronts adevelopment area, which requires transportationinfrastructure improvements. The design willprovide new pavement, improved drainage, pedestrian enhancements, streetscaping and controlled parking -- all elements which presently do not exist.
D. West Street Connector Extension - The West Street Connector Extension is a continuation of the South Madison West Street Connector. It runs from South MadisonStreet to Beech Street and provides for a secondary spine in the difficult-to-access Riverfront area. This infrastructure improvement supports the redevelopment of thenorthern bank of the Christina River. It will result in better vehicular access -- especially for special events -- which draws many visitors to the Riverfront.
E. West Street Connector Extension – Streetscape, South Madison to Stadium Drive This project completes the Connector Extension project by providing the necessarysidewalks, lighting, and trees for a pedestrian-friendly environment. It encourages pedestrian movement and complements the other transportation projects in the area.
WILMINGTON RIVERFRONT / TRANSIT CENTER (CONTINUED)
F. Browntown Pedestrian Walkway from Community Center to Stadium Area - This project provides a critical pedestrian link from the nearby community to theRiverfront Arts Center, Frawley Stadium, and other Riverfront attractions. It will construct pathways that are safe for pedestrians and encourage more pedestrian, ratherthan vehicular, movement in the area. The community is presently separated from the Riverfront by railroad tracks and the I-95 Viaduct.
G. Riverwalk VII– from Arts Boulevard to the end of Shipyard Shops - This continuation of the Riverwalk extends along the Christina River's northern bank adjacent tothe redevelopment's retail area known as the Shipyard Shops. The Riverwalk serves as the primary access to the shops from the river side. It further supports pedestrianaccess on the recently completed Riverwalk from the Transit Center and Tubman-Garrett Park to the retail area.
H. Riverwalk VIII– South of Shipyard Shops through Peterson Wildlife Preserve – The final portion of the Riverwalk will connect the Shipyard Shops to the EducationCenter at the Governor Peterson Wildlife Preserve. This provides pedestrian-friendly access to a wildlife refuge area and will be consistent with the designs of previousRiverwalk phases.
I. Market Street and Walnut Street Bridge Sidewalks – The walkway on these bridges and their approaches must be improved for safe pedestrian use. Due to pendingoffice developments on the south bank of the Christina Rivers (just south of the bridges), it is important for these links to be made. Just north of the bridges are the TransitCenter, Tubman-Garrett Park, the new Justice Center, and the central business district.
J. Interstate Access - With the continuing development of Wilmington's Riverfront, access for local and regional travelers becomes increasingly important for thisdevelopment to succeed. This on-going study allows the examination of option to new or improved connections from the area to I-95 and I-495.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The success of Wilmington’s redevelopment of this area depends on intermodal transportation improvements. The Riverwalk provides acritical pedestrian link from the Wilmington Transit Center and Riverfront Park to riverfront attractions like Frawley Stadium, the Arts Center, Shipyard Shops, restaurants, andentertainment.
County: New CastleMunicipality: WilmingtonProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 3Senatorial District: 3, 13
WILMINGTON RIVERFRONT / TRANSIT CENTER (CONTINUED)
EST COSTFMB ID INDIVIDUAL PROJECT TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR SEGMENTS FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 12,905 6,350 600 0
Program Development 100% ST 300 PLAN 100 100 100
20-121-02 A. Wilmington Trans Center 100% ST 450 PE 450Market St. to Walnut St 100% WILM. 300 PE 300
100% ST 850 ENV/R/W 850100% ST 4,900 C 4,900
B. Wilmington Trans Center 100% ST 200 PE 200Bus Staging Area 100% ST 2,150 C 2,150
C. Water St, - Shipley to West Sts. 100% ST 300 PE 300100% WILM 200 R/W 200
100% ST 1,200 C 1,200
99-121-02 D. West St. Connector Extension 100% ST 400 ENV 400100% ST 790 R/W 790100% ST 2,800 C 535 2,365
E. West St. Connector Extension 100% ST 650 PE 650Streetscape – S. Madison Dr to 100% ST 1,000 ENV 500 500Stadium Drive 100% ST 250 R/W 250
100% ST 4,400 C 4,400
F. Browntown PedWalkway 100% ST 75 PE 75Community Center to Stadium 100% ST 50 ENV 50
100% ST 50 R/W 15 35100% ST 475 C 475
G. Riverwalk VII from Arts Blvd. 100% ST 750 C 750To end of Shipyard Shops
H. Riverwalk VIII – from Shipyard 100% ST 600 PE 600Shops through Peterson Preserve 100% ST 3,280 C 3,280
I. Market and Walnut Sts. Bridges 100% ST 150 PE 150100% ST 600 C 600
J. Interstate Access 100% ST 100 100
All $ X 1,000
CHURCHMAN’S CROSSING TRANSIT FACILITIES
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: On June 29, 2000, the inauguration of rail servicewithin Churchman’s Crossing began. The establishment of the Fairplay Station atChurchman’s Crossing is an addition to existing SEPTA R2 commuter service betweenNewark, Wilmington, and Claymont to Central Philadelphia. The rail station isas an important improvement towards providing transportation alternatives tothe Churchman’s area community. The station also has integrated bus andshuttles providing connections adjacent to the new platform.
The next phase of the project will be the development of a transit center facility.This facility is projected to include both small-scale retail and servicebusinesses on the ground floor and offices on the upper floors. A transportationsales outlet center will also be located there and provide transit serviceinformation and amenities, creating an attractive transit center to focus onserving and attracting rail patrons. A parking garage is also planned as a sharedfacility with the private development (office complex) to minimize land impacts andmaximize open space.
The Fairplay Station improvements are being finalized and will include slope treatment behindthe platform and additional improvement to the pavilions. Future improvements to the stationwill include the addition of a speaker system on the platform, as well as further track improvements.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
Fairplay Station provides a viable alternative for riders who would normally travel to this area by car on I-95, helping mitigate congestion along the I-95 corridor.The new station will provides another transportation choice for the Churchman’s area. Coordinated bus service ensures timely delivery of employees to area businesses, whichcan also reduce roadway congestion. The Churchman’s Study and discussions with area business leaders have identified these transportation improvements as importantelements in trying to handle future travel demands in the face of rising traffic projections. The inclusion of a transit center into the design will provide the support servicesnecessary to make this an even better transportation attraction and assist in producing increases in rail and bus ridership in the area.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 3, 14, 16, 18, 24, 25Senatorial District: 3, 9, 10, 11, 13
CHURCHMAN’S CROSSING TRANSIT FACILITIES (CONTINUED)
FMB ID INDIVIDUAL EST COST CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR PROJECT FUNDING TO COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ
PROJ # SEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TTF0 6,454 0 0 0
Rail Station 100% ST 3,854 C 3,854
Public Announcement System 100% ST 30 C 30
Concrete Tie Improvement 100% ST 2,600 C 2,600From Newark to Wilm.
Track A, Landscape Imp’s 100% ST 30 R/W 30
Fairplay Station Slope Treat 100% ST 80 C 80
All $ X 1,000
13
9A
495
L
CLA
YMO
NT
ST TIN
AAV
E
MILLERS LANORTH STCENTER ST
SOUTH ST
ALBANY AVEHARRISBURG AVEDOVER AVE
WIL
MIN
GT
ON
AVE
BU
TTO
NW
OO
DS
TO
WN
SEN
DS
T
PEARL STD ST
C ST
B ST A ST
BR
AD
FOR
DS
T
CH
UR
CH
ST
GR
EE
NS
T
CL
AY
MO
NT
ST
NEWYORK AVE
GARASCHES LA
13
9A
495
L
CLA
YMO
NT
ST TIN
AAV
E
MILLERS LANORTH STCENTER ST
SOUTH ST
ALBANY AVEHARRISBURG AVEDOVER AVE
WIL
MIN
GT
ON
AVE
BU
TTO
NW
OO
DS
TO
WN
SEN
DS
T
PEARL STD ST
C ST
B ST A ST
BR
AD
FOR
DS
T
CH
UR
CH
ST
GR
EE
NS
T
CL
AY
MO
NT
ST
NEWYORK AVE
GARASCHES LA
PORT OF WILMINGTON
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The Port of Wilmington has beeninvolved in the import/export automobile trade for over twenty years. Inrecent years there have been two developing trends in this trade that willsignificantly impact Wilmington’s future in this business. First, there hasbeen a consolidation of a number of car companies worldwide. The recentChrysler/Daimler merger, the potential purchase of Volvo by Volkswagen,the General Motors interest in Asian car makes and others suggest aconsolidation of logistics routings will develop in the near future, likelyleading to fewer port calls for ocean carriers. The AutoPort facility hasbeen able to maintain its position in the export trade while others haveupgraded their port processing and vehicle facilities to accommodate manufacturer demandsfor quality.
In FY 2001 $10 million was authorized for the first phase of the AutoBerth construction.The second phase (of three) will be funded in FY 2002 for $15,000. It is anticipated thatanother $2.5 million will be needed to complete in FY 2003.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To maintain the Autoport as a viable commercial entity in the import/export automobile trade.
County: New CastleMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 2,3Senatorial District: 2
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 15,000 0 0 0
100% ST 15,000 15,000
OTHER 2,500 2,500
All $ X 1,000
82
100
141
LEY
LL RD
MO
NT
CH
AN
I NR
D
NEWBRIDGE
RD
ROCKLANDRD
BLA
CK
G
KE
NN
ETT
PIK
E
EA
ST
LA
THAXTE
N
LAENSIN
GTON
N
PONDSLA
CARILLON
CT
MEDFORD RD
WELWIN RD
DE
XTER
RD
COUNTRY CLUBD
CR
KERFOOTFARMRD
ROTHBURYRDCOUNTRY CLUB DR
FALK
IRK
EDG
DR
BU
CK
RID
GE
DR
BAR
LEY MIL
L
DR
LA
DR
LAKEVIEW
INGFIELD
VALL
EYG
RE
ENDR
CA
RR
IAG
ERD
VA
LMY
LA
HA
LSE
YD
R
LAS
TR
AD
A TE
RA
MO
GALE
LAL
A
LA
LA
BE
LLA
NT
CT
FAIRTHORNELAORIENTE
AVE
RD
BARLEY
WA
RW
I
HE
AT
HE
RD
R
ARDLEIGH
DR
BROOKVALLEYRD
BR
OO
KM
EA
DO
WR
D
SUNNYSIDERDWH
EEL
OC
KL
A
GR
EE
NR
OC
KDRMONTCHAN DR
OLD CHURCH
RD
PRE
SIDE
NTI
AL DRSEN
ITOR
IAL
DR
CONGRESSIONAL
DR
KENT
82
100
141
LEY
LL RD
MO
NT
CH
AN
I NR
D
NEWBRIDGE
RD
ROCKLANDRD
BLA
CK
G
KE
NN
ETT
PIK
E
EA
ST
LA
THAXTE
N
LAENSIN
GTON
N
PONDSLA
CARILLON
CT
MEDFORD RD
WELWIN RD
DE
XTER
RD
COUNTRY CLUBD
CR
KERFOOTFARMRD
ROTHBURYRDCOUNTRY CLUB DR
FALK
IRK
EDG
DR
BU
CK
RID
GE
DR
BAR
LEY MIL
L
DR
LA
DR
LAKEVIEW
INGFIELD
VALL
EYG
RE
ENDR
CA
RR
IAG
ERD
VA
LMY
LA
HA
LSE
YD
R
LAS
TR
AD
A TE
RA
MO
GALE
LAL
A
LA
LA
BE
LLA
NT
CT
FAIRTHORNELAORIENTE
AVE
RD
BARLEY
WA
RW
I
HE
AT
HE
RD
R
ARDLEIGH
DR
BROOKVALLEYRD
BR
OO
KM
EA
DO
WR
D
SUNNYSIDERDWH
EEL
OC
KL
A
GR
EE
NR
OC
KDRMONTCHAN DR
OLD CHURCH
RD
PRE
SIDE
NTI
AL DRSEN
ITOR
IAL
DR
CONGRESSIONAL
DR
KENT
SR141, KENNETT PIKE TO US202
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This segment of SR141 includes the Tyler McConnellBridge, a two-lane structure crossing the Brandywine River near theDuPont Experimental Station and the Hagley Museum. This segment ofSR141 is a critical link in supporting the major business centers alongSR141 from I95 to US202, including DuPont and Astra-Zeneca. Onlybeing two lanes, the Tyler McConnell Bridge has limited capacity tosupport current traffic volumes and will continue to act as a pinch point inthis segment of the corridor. As part of our public outreach effort, aWorking Group has been created to assist the Department in thedevelopment of a multi-modal solution to this problem, while minimizingthe impacts of any proposed solution to the many environmental andhistoric resources of this area. Future public workshops will be scheduled to present informationon various alternatives. These will include items such as operational improvements associatedwith the DuPont Station entrances and the Rte100 intersection; transit and ITMS for the SR141corridor; capacity improvements associated with the Tyler McConnell Bridge; and other corridorimprovements under construction.A complete assessment of the impacts of these various alternatives and packages of improvementswill be made in order to develop a final recommendation on the preferred transportation solution to the Governor and Legislative – as called for in the FY 2001 Bond Bill.
County: New CastleProgram Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 6,4,11Senatorial District: 1,4, 6
FMB I.D. EST COST CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR FUNDING TO COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ
PROJ # IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TTF0 4,166 12,339 0 0
80% FHWA 100 PLAN 100100% ST 500 PLAN 500100% ST 7,000 PE 7,000100% ST 8,000 R/W 8,000
80% AC FHWA 58,493 C 61,694
All $ X 1,000
SR141 / US202 AREA IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Rockland Road to US202 – The approved Blue Ball Properties Master Plan has outlined recommendations fortransportation and park and recreation improvements in this area associated with expansion of the Astra Zeneca complex. The recommendations, theimprovements will be designed in phases:
• 1 – The SR141 / US202 work program will include stormwater management (SWM) throughout the area.
• 2 - West Side Roads – Includes new West Side Park Road, relocation of Rockland Road, West Side Park greenways, and stormwater management.
• 3 - East Side Roads – Includes new East Side Park Road, relocation of Weldin Road, relocation of Carruthers Lane, and East Side Park greenways.
• 4 - Utility Relocations – Development of a utility corridor to relocate utilities from US202 to West Side Park Road
• 5 - US202 – Improvements to US202, between I-95 Ramp and north of Powder Mill Road, includes new underpasses on US202 at Foulk Road and East Side Park Road;and improvements at the US202/Powder Mill Road intersection.
• 6 - SR141 Spur – Construction of a new road to connect SR141 and US202 at Foulk Road.
• The Parks and Recreation element of the improvements will include:� Restoration of the Blue Ball Dairy Barn located to the southwest of of the intersection of US202 and Rockland Road� Construction of a portion of the Northern Delaware greenway through the Blue Ball properties which will link the City of Wilmington at the Brandywine River.
County: New CastleProgram Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 4, 6Senatorial District: 1, 4
202
ROCKW
O
RD
FOU
LKR
WELDIN RD
DR
CO
LER
IDG
E
BYR
ON
CO
VER
LY
LONDON
MA
TSON
MATSON RUN
PKW
YE
AP
KWY
RU
N
RD
RD
RD
LA
TALLEY CT
FIELDING
WYCLIF
LOWELL
WHITTIER
TENN
YS
ON
EM
ER
SO
N
MIL
TON
DR
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
CH
ANN
ING
RD
LITTLEROCK
BIG ROCKDR
PEBBLEDR
EDGEWOOD
RD OXF
OR
D
PLSO
ME
RSE
T
NO
RR
ISR
DR
D
DARTMOOR D
NORWOO
MALD
CRANBROOK
TALLEY HILL LA
DANSFIELD DR
SYLVAN US DR
DIN
CI IR
EL
DIN
CI IR
DR
BEECHWOLD AVE
YD
R
UN
RD
AL
DC
IRCAPANO CT
GR
AY
RO
CK
DE
LW
OO
DR
DP
ENN
LA
AR
RO
NC
I R
OLI V
EC
I R
BE
LV
IOR
CI R
CA
RO
TH
ER
SLA
ALAPOCAS
DR
ON
E
TOWER
LA
GRANITE RD
SCHO
OL
RD
BROOMPL
FRANKLINPL
VANBUREN
40T
IRVING
DR
HAWTHORNE
Contract 3
202
ROCKW
O
RD
FOU
LKR
WELDIN RD
DR
CO
LER
IDG
E
BYR
ON
CO
VER
LY
LONDON
MA
TSON
MATSON RUN
PKW
YE
AP
KWY
RU
N
RD
RD
RD
LA
TALLEY CT
FIELDING
WYCLIF
LOWELL
WHITTIER
TENN
YS
ON
EM
ER
SO
N
MIL
TON
DR
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
CH
ANN
ING
RD
LITTLEROCK
BIG ROCKDR
PEBBLEDR
EDGEWOOD
RD OXF
OR
D
PLSO
ME
RSE
T
NO
RR
ISR
DR
D
DARTMOOR D
NORWOO
MALD
CRANBROOK
TALLEY HILL LA
DANSFIELD DR
SYLVAN US DR
DIN
CI IR
EL
DIN
CI IR
DR
BEECHWOLD AVE
YD
R
UN
RD
AL
DC
IRCAPANO CT
GR
AY
RO
CK
DE
LW
OO
DR
DP
ENN
LA
AR
RO
NC
I R
OLI V
EC
I R
BE
LV
IOR
CI R
CA
RO
TH
ER
SLA
ALAPOCAS
DR
ON
E
TOWER
LA
GRANITE RD
SCHO
OL
RD
BROOMPL
FRANKLINPL
VANBUREN
40T
IRVING
DR
HAWTHORNE
Contract 3
202
D
FOU
LKR
D
WELDIN RD
COLE
RID
GE
BYRON
COV
ERLY
LOND
MATSON
MATSON
RD
RD
RD
LA
TALLEY C
F
EDGEWOOD
RD OXF
ORD
PLSO
MER
SET
NORR
ISR
DRD
T
SYLVANUS
BEECHWOLD AV
BEDFORD BLBAR
DY
DR
KE
YR
UN
RD
SADDLE
GER
ALD
CIRCAPANO CT
GR
AY
RO
CK
DE
LWO
OD
RD
PEN
NLA
AR
RO
NC
I R
OLI V
EC
IR
BE
LVIO
RC
IR
CA
RO
THE
RS
LA
ALAPOCASDR
GRANITE R
SCHOO
LRD
202
D
FOU
LKR
D
WELDIN RD
COLE
RID
GE
BYRON
COV
ERLY
LOND
MATSON
MATSON
RD
RD
RD
LA
TALLEY C
F
EDGEWOOD
RD OXF
ORD
PLSO
MER
SET
NORR
ISR
DRD
T
SYLVANUS
BEECHWOLD AV
BEDFORD BLBAR
DY
DR
KE
YR
UN
RD
SADDLE
GER
ALD
CIRCAPANO CT
GR
AY
RO
CK
DE
LWO
OD
RD
PEN
NLA
AR
RO
NC
I R
OLI V
EC
IR
BE
LVIO
RC
IR
CA
RO
THE
RS
LA
ALAPOCASDR
GRANITE R
SCHOO
LRD
202
RO
CKWO
ODRD
RD
DC
FOU
LKR
D
WELDIN RD
DR
CARILLON
CT
RDDEVONSHIRE RDOLD POINT RD D W
OAKWOOD
D
GUMWO
PELHAM R
WELLINGT
TR
D
OKL
AH
OM
AA
VE
DA
KO
TA
AV
E
NE
VA
DA
DR
HOLLANDDR
COLORADO AVE
GLENWOODAVEMEDFORD RD
WELWIN RD
DE
XT
ERR
D
COUNTRYCLUB
YORK RD
HURST RDHAVERFORD
RD
BE
DF
OR
DRD
JACK
SON
BLVD
ACRERD
LONGPIERCE
CO
LER
IDG
E
BYRON
CO
VER
LY
LONDON
MATSO
N
MATSON
RUN
PK
WY
PKW
YR
UN
RD
RD
RD
LA
TALL
EY CT
FIELDING
WYCLIF
LOWELL
WHITTIER
TEN
NY
SON
ME
RS
ON
TON
MILT
ON
DR
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
NNIN
GR
D
L ITTLEROCK
BIGROCKDR
PEBBLEDR
D
EDGEWOOD
RD OXF
OR
D PL
SO
MER
SE
T
NO
RR
ISR
DR
D
DARTMOOR DR
NORWOOD DR
MALDEN DR
CRANBROOK
TALLEY HILL LA
DANSFIELD DR
SYLVANUS DR
WE
LD
I NC
II R
WE
LD
INC
IIR
BEZEL RD
HU
MM
OC
K
CTD
R
BEECHWOLD AVE
BEDFORD BLVD
GU
NN
ING
DR
SIMON RD
SIMON RD
FO
RE
ST
DA
L ED
R
WOODLEY CIR
TA
LLE
YR
D
LO
MB
AR
DY
DR
TU
RK
EY
RU
NR
D
SADDLE LA
GE
RA
LD
CIR
CAPANO CT
GR
AY
RO
CK
DE
LW
OO
DR
DP
EN
NLA
AR
RO
NC
IR
OLIV
EC
I R
BE
LV
IOR
CIR
CA
RO
TH
ER
SLA
ALAPOCAS
DRHILL RD
ER
LA
GRANITERD
SCHO
OL
RD
MPL
L REN
IRVING
HAWTHORNE
Contract 5
202
RO
CKWO
ODRD
RD
DC
FOU
LKR
D
WELDIN RD
DR
CARILLON
CT
RDDEVONSHIRE RDOLD POINT RD D W
OAKWOOD
D
GUMWO
PELHAM R
WELLINGT
TR
D
OKL
AH
OM
AA
VE
DA
KO
TA
AV
E
NE
VA
DA
DR
HOLLANDDR
COLORADO AVE
GLENWOODAVEMEDFORD RD
WELWIN RD
DE
XT
ERR
D
COUNTRYCLUB
YORK RD
HURST RDHAVERFORD
RD
BE
DF
OR
DRD
JACK
SON
BLVD
ACRERD
LONGPIERCE
CO
LER
IDG
E
BYRON
CO
VER
LY
LONDON
MATSO
N
MATSON
RUN
PK
WY
PKW
YR
UN
RD
RD
RD
LA
TALL
EY CT
FIELDING
WYCLIF
LOWELL
WHITTIER
TEN
NY
SON
ME
RS
ON
TON
MILT
ON
DR
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
NNIN
GR
D
L ITTLEROCK
BIGROCKDR
PEBBLEDR
D
EDGEWOOD
RD OXF
OR
D PL
SO
MER
SE
T
NO
RR
ISR
DR
D
DARTMOOR DR
NORWOOD DR
MALDEN DR
CRANBROOK
TALLEY HILL LA
DANSFIELD DR
SYLVANUS DRW
EL
DI N
CII R
WE
LD
INC
II R
BEZEL RD
HU
MM
OC
K
CTD
R
BEECHWOLD AVE
BEDFORD BLVD
GU
NN
ING
DR
SIMON RD
SIMON RD
FO
RE
ST
DA
L ED
R
WOODLEY CIR
TA
LLE
YR
D
LO
MB
AR
DY
DR
TU
RK
EY
RU
NR
D
SADDLE LA
GE
RA
LD
CIR
CAPANO CT
GR
AY
RO
CK
DE
LW
OO
DR
DP
EN
NLA
AR
RO
NC
IR
OLIV
EC
I R
BE
LV
IOR
CIR
CA
RO
TH
ER
SLA
ALAPOCAS
DRHILL RD
ER
LA
GRANITERD
SCHO
OL
RD
MPL
L REN
IRVING
HAWTHORNE
Contract 5 202
GE
RD
RDB
FOU
LKR
D
W
CARILLON
CT
RD
DEVONSHIRE RDOLD POINT RD
MONTICELLO RDHE E
RD
WAVERLY
WELLINGTON
OAKWOOD
D
MEDFORD RD
WELWIN RD
DE
XTE
RR
D
WAYCROSS RD
COUNTRY
CLUB
DR
YORK RD
HURST RDHAVERFORD
RD
BE
DF
OR
DR
D
JAC
KSON
BLV
D
AC
RD
L
PIERCE
CA
RO
TH
ER
SLA
Contract 6
202
GE
RD
RDB
FOU
LKR
D
W
CARILLON
CT
RD
DEVONSHIRE RDOLD POINT RD
MONTICELLO RDHE E
RD
WAVERLY
WELLINGTON
OAKWOOD
D
MEDFORD RD
WELWIN RD
DE
XTE
RR
D
WAYCROSS RD
COUNTRY
CLUB
DR
YORK RD
HURST RDHAVERFORD
RD
BE
DF
OR
DR
D
JAC
KSON
BLV
D
AC
RD
L
PIERCE
CA
RO
TH
ER
SLA
Contract 6
SR141 / US202 AREA IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2 - West Side Roads 3 – East Side Roads
5 – SR141 / US202 and US202 6 – Spur Road
SR141 / US202 AREA IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
INDIVIDUAL EST COST CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING TO COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJSEGMENTS IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TTF
0 0 0 0 0
Blue Ball Properties Master Plan• Work Program
Stormwater Management (SWM) 100% ST 500 PE 500
• Improvements 2-5 100% ST 8,423 PE 8,423
• 2 – West Side Roads 100% ST 13,029 C 13,029100% ST 5,000 SWM 5,000
• 3 – East Side Roads 100% ST 2,000 R/W 2,000100% ST 13,067 C 13,782
• 4 – Utility Relocations 100% ST 50 R/W 50100% ST 3,500 C 3,500
• 5 – US202/SR141 & US202 100% ST 500 R/W 52780% AC FHWA 33,629 C 36,427
• 6 – Spur Road 100% ST 962 PE 96280% FHWA 9,620 C 10,702
Parks and Recreation Element
• Work Program
Historic Preservation – Blue 100% ST 4,552 HIST 4,552Ball Barn Building
Greenway 100% ST 828 PE/C 828
All $ X 1,000
WILMINGTON TRANSIT CONNECTOR (TROLLEY)
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The Wilmington Trolleyroute is approximately two miles in length from the ChristinaRiverfront to 11th and 12th Streets. Wilmington’s trolley system willconnect the City’s three main activity centers: (1) the office area inthe northern part of the central business district alongDelaware/Washington Avenues; (2) the major commercial spine(Market Street) and Amtrak train station area; and (3) the Christinawaterfront area, which is being developed as an arts/entertainmentcenter. The (10) steel wheel replica trolleys will be powered by anoverhead electrical system and is expected to serve approximately760,000 paid trips annually.
A total of 23 potential station locations have been identified for study. Many of theselocations offer major transfer opportunities to other modes of travel, as well as theopportunity to provide neighborhood connections to the city’s major activity centers.
The proposed alignment will operate on reserved right-of-way along the ChristinaWaterfront; on streets through the existing commercial spine (Market Street); and willcirculate on 11th and 12th Streets in the city’s office center area to complete itscommercial loop. This alignment was selected through a comprehensive publicinvolvement process led by the City of Wilmington.
Total capital funding requirements (in 1999$’s) are $37.5 million with $4.2 million from the City, $3.7 million from private sources, $3.7 million from State transportationfunds, and the remainder from Federal Transit Administration (FTA) discretionary funding earmarked for new projects. The first $1 million in federal money was appropriatedwithin the FY 2000 federal budget.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The Wilmington Trolley will:• Support key state and city policy and planning goals.• Enhance the existing transportation system.• Strongly support recent and future economic development.• Encourage additional investment in this urban area.
The projected net annual operating cost is $1.5 million. 10% will come from the private sector; 10% from the City of Wilmington; and 80% from State transportation funds.The remaining $0.5 million in operating costs are expected to be funded from the farebox.
WILMINGTON TRANSIT CONNECTOR (TROLLEY) (CONTINUED)
County: New CastleProgram Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 2,3Senatorial District: 2,3
FMB ID EST COST CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR FUNDING TO COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 PROJ 7/01-6/02 PROJ 7/02-6/03 PROJ 7/03-6/04 PROJ 7/04-6/07 PROJ
PROJ # IN TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TTF0 420 2,382 1,428 0
DISC FTA 31,126 PE/C 2,000 5,000 14,129 9,997WILMINGTON 4,230 PE/C 250 170 2,382 1,428PRIVATE 4,230 C 420 2,382 1,428STATE 4,230 C 420 2,382 1,428
All $ X 1,000
BR137A ON K137 OVER DUCK CREEK, CLAYTON
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace existing timber bridge and provide scourprotection for foundation.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficientand ranks 15th on the bridge deficiency list.
County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 15,15Senatorial District: 28
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 17 56
100% ST 60 PE 64100% ST 17 R/W 17
80% FHWA 281 C 281
All $ X 1,000
15
W. D
UC
KC
RE
EK
RD
SCHOOL LA
W. COMMERCE ST
S. CARTERRD
WH
EAT
LEYS
PO
ND
RD
ST
HUDSONGAN
DER
DR SC
C.H.
PO
STATEALLEY
HIGHLAN
DAVE
WASHING
TONAVE
PEACHALLEY
WES
T
STAPP
LEAL
CLAYTONAVE
CHERR
YAL
WILSON
AVE
COLEM
ANST
LEEDSBLVD
RE
ED
ST
SMYRNA AVE
PEAR ALLEY
KIRKWOOD ST
PLUM ALLEY
HASLETT ST
RO
DN
EYS
T
RO
DN
EY
ST
BA
SS
ETT
ST
DU
MP
RD
COLMAR MANOR
SPRUANCE CITY
CEDARBR MO
OR
ES
LA
GLENWAY
AVE
MA
NOR
DR
ROXANNAVE
LAKEST
FRAZIER
ST
KENT
WAY
LAKE DR LAKE
CO
M
HAMIL
TON
WAY
MERR
ILL
WAY LA
KHAMIL
TON
RODN
EYST
ANTHO
NYLA FR
AZI
ERST
FIS
CULB
REATH
CLAYTON
AVE
MT
VERNON
MT
VERNO
COM
MER
CE
ST
STM
ULB
ERRYST
CUM
MINS
ST
HIGH
ST
HIGH
ST
NEWST
SCHOO
L
LAM
ARKETST
AWAR
E
LNUT
UNION
STST
LEXIN
GTON
AVE
MU
STARD
TDRROBERTS DR
G
NORTH
PETER
SON
BENSO
NST
DW
IGHT T
HOWARD
ST
CLEMENT
ST
UPHAMST
TURNERS ROW
KATESW
AY
CINDYLA
JOHNS
RD
LAKE DR W.
LAKEDR
W. M
AR
ILY
NR
D
OW
EN
SB
RO
OK
ED
R
KENT
WAY
15
W. D
UC
KC
RE
EK
RD
SCHOOL LA
W. COMMERCE ST
S. CARTERRD
WH
EAT
LEYS
PO
ND
RD
ST
HUDSONGAN
DER
DR SC
C.H.
PO
STATEALLEY
HIGHLAN
DAVE
WASHING
TONAVE
PEACHALLEY
WES
T
STAPP
LEAL
CLAYTONAVE
CHERR
YAL
WILSON
AVE
COLEM
ANST
LEEDSBLVD
RE
ED
ST
SMYRNA AVE
PEAR ALLEY
KIRKWOOD ST
PLUM ALLEY
HASLETT ST
RO
DN
EYS
T
RO
DN
EY
ST
BA
SS
ETT
ST
DU
MP
RD
COLMAR MANOR
SPRUANCE CITY
CEDARBR MO
OR
ES
LA
GLENWAY
AVE
MA
NOR
DR
ROXANNAVE
LAKEST
FRAZIER
ST
KENT
WAY
LAKE DR LAKE
CO
M
HAMIL
TON
WAY
MERR
ILL
WAY LA
KHAMIL
TON
RODN
EYST
ANTHO
NYLA FR
AZI
ERST
FIS
CULB
REATH
CLAYTON
AVEM
TVERNO
N
MT
VERNO
COM
MER
CE
ST
ST
MU
LBERRY
ST
CUM
MINS
ST
HIGH
ST
HIGH
ST
NEWST
SCHOO
L
LA
MARKET
ST
AWAR
E
LNUT
UNION
ST
ST
LEXIN
GTON
AVE
MU
STARD
TDRROBERTS DR
G
NORTH
PETER
SON
BENSO
NST
DW
IGHT T
HOWARD
ST
CLEMENT
ST
UPHAMST
TURNERS ROW
KATESW
AY
CINDYLA
JOHNS
RD
LAKE DR W.
LAKEDR
W. M
AR
ILY
NR
D
OW
EN
SB
RO
OK
ED
R
KENT
WAY
BR156A ON SAULSBURY ROAD (K156) OVER FORK BRANCH
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will focus on rehabilitation of theexisting deck by post-tensioning the glue laminate deck or using a similar technique to reducecracking and excessive deflection.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andranks 78th on the bridge deficiency list.
County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 29Senatorial District: 15,17
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 40 0 0 0
20-075-01 80% FHWA 200 C 200
All $ X 1,000
15
15
MCK
EERD
KEN
TON
RD
W. DENNEYS RD
YR
D
KENTON
RD
CENTRAL CHURCH RD
RDWINDING RIDGE
CA
RLISLE
DR
.
WATERFALL
DR.GRINDING W
HEEL
DR
.
GRISTMILL
PL.
GRISTM
ILL
MILLCREEK
CIR. DR
.
MIL
LCR
EEK
NIBLICKCT.MICHAELCT. DR
.
KENSIN
ARDSLEY DR.
ASH
BY
LA.
AR
DS
LEY
CIR
.
CR
OS
LE
YC
T.
COVERLY
TERR.
CO
VER
LYCT
.
COPELYCT.
R
DUPONTCH
BEECH HAVEN DR
ECH DR
TAMMIE DR
CAR
LISL
EDR
TAMMIEDR
BAY CIR. S.
EN ROC
15
15
MCK
EERD
KEN
TON
RD
W. DENNEYS RD
YR
D
KENTON
RD
CENTRAL CHURCH RD
RDWINDING RIDGE
CA
RLISLE
DR
.
WATERFALL
DR.GRINDING W
HEEL
DR
.
GRISTMILL
PL.
GRISTM
ILL
MILLCREEK
CIR. DR
.
MIL
LCR
EEK
NIBLICKCT.MICHAELCT. DR
.
KENSIN
ARDSLEY DR.
ASH
BY
LA.
AR
DS
LEY
CIR
.
CR
OS
LE
YC
T.
COVERLY
TERR.
CO
VER
LYCT
.
COPELYCT.
R
DUPONTCH
BEECH HAVEN DR
ECH DR
TAMMIE DR
CAR
LISL
EDR
TAMMIEDR
BAY CIR. S.
EN ROC
BR210A ON K208 OVER SHADES BRANCH, SOUTH OF MARYDEL
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace bridge with prestressed concrete structure onpile supported abutments. Raise roadway profile to eliminate flooding. Retain roadway fillwith sheet pile wall. Place guardrail at approaches and riprap atabutments.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficientand is functionally obsolete. The bridge is ranked 61st on the bridge
deficiency list.
County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 30Senatorial District: 15
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 147 0 0 0
100% ST 104 PE 104100% ST 8 R/W 8
80% FHWA 698 C 695
All $ X 1,000
MA
HA
NC
OR
NE
RR
D
SANDY BEND RD
SHA
DY
BR
IDG
ER
D
MUD MILL RD
STILL RD
PO
NY
TR
AC
KR
D
MA
HA
NC
OR
NE
RR
D
SANDY BEND RD
SHA
DY
BR
IDG
ER
D
MUD MILL RD
STILL RD
PO
NY
TR
AC
KR
D
BR348A ON POSTLES CORNER ROAD, NORTHEAST OF DOVER AIRFORCE BASE
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorated timber bridge with corrugatedmetal box. This bridge is located at one of the entrances to Dover AirForce Base and is the only outlet for a local trash removal business.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andcurrently ranks 22nd on the bridge deficiency list.
County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 32Senatorial District: 16, 17
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 202 0 0 0
98-075-02 100% ST 300 C 300
All $ X 1,000
9
BA
YSI
DE
DR
POSTLES CORNER RD
HOR
SEPONDRD
LAJESST
ST19th
ST
20th
13th ST
BE
h ST
10th
ST8t
hSTPAR
ISST
ST
ST
MAYS LA
JANESR
D
JANES
CIR
OUT OFCITY
9
BA
YSI
DE
DR
POSTLES CORNER RD
HOR
SEPONDRD
LAJESST
ST19th
ST
20th
13th ST
BE
h ST
10th
ST8t
hSTPAR
ISST
ST
ST
MAYS LA
JANESR
D
JANES
CIR
OUT OFCITY
CAMDEN / WYOMING TRUCK ROUTE INCLUDING WEST RAILROAD AVENUE
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:
A Truck Route Study has been completed and improvementrecommendations have been forwarded for design. Specificimprovements include signing, striping, and turning radii changes.These improvements will be combined with others listed below.
Camden Wyoming Avenue: Install automatic gates at each of thefour railroad crossings; install advance warning signs; and completesidewalks.
Southern Boulevard: Install at-grade automatic gates at the SouthernBoulevard rail crossing. This will also include completion of sidewalks on the northwestcorner and elimination of the stop sign for westbound traffic, thus making SouthernBoulevard a through movement.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To reduce the potential for rail/motor vehicle collisionsand improve safety at the rail crossings.
County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 34Senatorial District: 16
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 50 134 0
100% ST 72 PE 72100% ST 50 R/W 50
80% FHWA 672 C 672
All $ X 1,000
CAMDEN-WYOMING AVE
LL RD
VE
RD
CAMBRIDGE
RDCARTERCHAPELDR
LA
MEETINGHOUSE
LA
WE
ST
ST
CENTER ST
WE
EK
SD
R
TH
OR
NLE
YD
R
ST
WILLIAM ST
C.H.
PO
WILLOW
AVE
JAN
EK
AD
R
CE
DA
RLA
SOUTH ST
WE
SLE
YS
T
PR
AT
TIS
ST
STEVENS STAPPLE STPEACH STPLUM ST
APPLETREE LA
ME
AD
OW
AV
E
PIN
E ST
EAS
T
R.R
.A
VE
JEN
KIN
SD
RM
ECH
ANIC
ST
FRANKLINST
GRANTST
BROADST
THIRDST
LAKEDR
PRICE
CH
URC
HD
RM
ILL
ST
SEWAGE PLANT ST
MEDALLION CIR
C.0. HA
RR
ISO
NA
VE
NORTHSOUTH
DRCAMDEN-WYOMING AVE
LL RD
VE
RD
CAMBRIDGE
RDCARTERCHAPELDR
LA
MEETINGHOUSE
LA
WE
ST
ST
CENTER ST
WE
EK
SD
R
TH
OR
NLE
YD
R
ST
WILLIAM ST
C.H.
PO
WILLOW
AVE
JAN
EK
AD
R
CE
DA
RLA
SOUTH ST
WE
SLE
YS
T
PR
AT
TIS
ST
STEVENS STAPPLE STPEACH STPLUM ST
APPLETREE LA
ME
AD
OW
AV
E
PIN
E ST
EAS
T
R.R
.A
VE
JEN
KIN
SD
RM
ECH
ANIC
ST
FRANKLINST
GRANTST
BROADST
THIRDST
LAKEDR
PRICE
CH
URC
HD
RM
ILL
ST
SEWAGE PLANT ST
MEDALLION CIR
C.0. HA
RR
ISO
NA
VE
NORTHSOUTH
DR
GOVERNOR’S AVENUE, WEBB’S LANE TO WATER STREET, SAFETY
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project has been assigned to Dover/Kent MPO,who will work with the City of Dover and local residents to define and implement thisproject. Possible improvements include construction of curbs andgutters, sidewalks, closed drainage system, shoulder reconstruction,bridge replacement, and restriping, as well as some minor wideningimprovements (including intersection improvements at Water Street).The improvements may also include striping and signalization atGovernor’s Avenue and Water Street.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The recommendations of this study willfocus on improving safety, drainage, and signalization to promote multi-modal usage of this section of Governor’s Avenue.
County: KentMunicipality: DoverProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 32Senatorial District: 16, 17
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 400 0 926 0
100% ST 400 PE 40080% FHWA 4,632 C 4,632
All $ X 1,000
13A
113A
13
S. QU
EE
NST
WEBBS LA
W. WATER ST
BA
YR
D
NEW
BURTO
NR
D
HIGHVIEW AVE
AVE
NORTH STT
STEWART
CT
GOODEN
AVE
LAUREL
DR
ST
AT
ES
T
CA
PIT
ALAV
E
GA A
MA
ND
R TU
RN
ER
AL D
ER
RD
KESSERLING
MOCKINGBIRD
MIMOSA
MAYBERRY
PO
ST
BL
AVEAVE
AVE
LA
SHADOW
BA
KE
R
BLU
EB
EA
CH
FID
DL
ER
SG
RE
EN
WIN
TER
BER
RY
DO
GW
OO
D
DOGWOODAVE
CT
DR
TU
RN
CT
RD
CA
PIT
OL
PL
GOVERNORBLVD
PRESIDENT DR
CO
NG
RE
SS
PL
SEN
ATOR
AV
E
STA
TEC
IRW
AS
HIN
GTO
NPL
DO
VER
CIR
EV
ER
GR
EE
N
EVERG
REENCIR
DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
SACKARACKIN AVE
PINE ST
LOTIS
ST
PA
RK
AV
E
ORCHARD
AVE
HOPE ST
DOVER ST
NE
WS
T
SHERWO
OD CT
WAPLES AVE
KO
NSC
HAK
AVE
WO
ODFORD
DR
SH
AN
KR
DJ A
NE
KA
L A
WE
ST
VIE
WT
ER
R
TE
RR
TE
RR
SU
NS
ET
MO
NR
OE
WO
OD
SE
DG
E
RDWOODBURNCIR
WYOMING AVEBR
AD
FO
RD
ST
JEFFERSON
TERR
CH
ARLE
S DR
HOLLY DROAK DR YE
AR
SL
EY DR
CRESCENT DR
LYNNHAVENDR
RO
BER
TAA
V
CR
AWFO
RD
AVE
T
ST
ILL
AVE
NE
WC
AS
TLESUSSEX
COLLINSAXE
DR
RIV
ER
RD
STA
VE
BANK
KER
BIN
ST
ELM TERR
SC
DUPONT
STST
SH
OT
GU
N
ALL
EY
SOUTH ST
QU
EEN
ST
TE
R
A NC
E
INIM
A
T
ST
T
RODRIC
TERRACE
McB
RY
DR
McBRY CT
HUNTLEY CIR
RD
13A
113A
13
S. QU
EE
NST
WEBBS LA
W. WATER ST
BA
YR
D
NEW
BURTO
NR
D
HIGHVIEW AVE
AVE
NORTH STT
STEWART
CT
GOODEN
AVE
LAUREL
DR
ST
AT
ES
T
CA
PIT
ALAV
E
GA A
MA
ND
R TU
RN
ER
AL D
ER
RD
KESSERLING
MOCKINGBIRD
MIMOSA
MAYBERRYP
OS
TB
L
AVEAVE
AVE
LA
SHADOW
BA
KE
R
BLU
EB
EA
CH
FID
DL
ER
SG
RE
EN
WIN
TER
BER
RY
DO
GW
OO
D
DOGWOODAVE
CT
DR
TU
RN
CT
RD
CA
PIT
OL
PL
GOVERNORBLVD
PRESIDENT DR
CO
NG
RE
SS
PL
SEN
ATOR
AV
E
STA
TEC
IRW
AS
HIN
GTO
NPL
DO
VER
CIR
EV
ER
GR
EE
N
EVERG
REENCIR
DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
SACKARACKIN AVE
PINE ST
LOTIS
ST
PA
RK
AV
E
ORCHARD
AVE
HOPE ST
DOVER ST
NE
WS
T
SHERWO
OD CT
WAPLES AVE
KO
NSC
HAK
AVE
WO
ODFORD
DR
SH
AN
KR
DJ A
NE
KA
L A
WE
ST
VIE
WT
ER
R
TE
RR
TE
RR
SU
NS
ET
MO
NR
OE
WO
OD
SE
DG
E
RDWOODBURNCIR
WYOMING AVEBR
AD
FO
RD
ST
JEFFERSON
TERR
CH
ARLE
S DR
HOLLY DROAK DR YE
AR
SL
EY DR
CRESCENT DR
LYNNHAVENDR
RO
BER
TAA
V
CR
AWFO
RD
AVE
T
ST
ILL
AVE
NE
WC
AS
TLESUSSEX
COLLINSAXE
DR
RIV
ER
RD
STA
VE
BANK
KER
BIN
ST
ELM TERR
SC
DUPONT
STST
SH
OT
GU
N
ALL
EY
SOUTH ST
QU
EEN
ST
TE
R
A NC
E
INIM
A
T
ST
T
RODRIC
TERRACE
McB
RY
DR
McBRY CT
HUNTLEY CIR
RD
HARRINGTON TRUCK ROUTE (CON TINUED)
LOOCKERMAN STREET, QUEEN STREET TO STATE STREET, SAFETY
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include installation of a“signal ahead” sign; improved turning movements at Loockerman/Queen Streets;pedestrian signals; adding left turn arrows to pavement markings;installing handicapped curb cuts at Queen Street; and adding a signalon a mast arm.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To improve safety for multi-modalmovements throughout the area, which has a high accident rate.
County: KentMunicipality: DoverProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 32Senatorial District: 16, 17
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 42 40 0
100% ST 42 PE 4280% FHWA 200 C 200
All $ X 1,000
DIVISION ST
E. LOOCKERMAN ST
DR
BYRAE
KE
AVE
LIBERTYST
DUKE OF YORK
ST
S.EASTAV
THE PLAZA
NORTH
ST
BANK
LAAVE
WILLIAM
PENN
C.H.
POWEST
ST
SLAUGHTER
ST
ST
MINORREED
ST
TON
ST
GREENHILL
RD
PARK
DR
ST
AVE
COURT
CAPITOL
QUEEN
ST
DIVISION ST
E. LOOCKERMAN ST
DR
BYRAE
KE
AV
LIBERTYST
DUKE OF YORK
ST
S.EASTAV
THE PLAZA
NORTH
ST
BANK
LAAVE
WILLIAM
PENN
C.H.
POWEST
ST
SLAUGHTER
ST
ST
MINORREED
ST
TON
ST
GREENHILL
RD
PARK
DR
ST
AVE
COURT
CAPITOL
QUEEN
ST
SR 1 AND US 13 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS, KENT COUNTY
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The projects identified in Kent County to preserve the capacity of this transportation corridor. Some of these locations are include:
A. SR 1/US113A Little Heaven - Realign US113A north of Little Heaven to tie into a parallel roadway.
B. US 13 / Peach Basket Road (Felton) Intersection – Intersection improvements to improve traffic flow.
C. Thompsonville Overpass – Construct a new overpass.
D. Construction of auxiliary turning lanes throughout the SR 1 Corridor in Kent County
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To preserve the capacity in the SR 1 and US 13 Corridor.
County: KentMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 33Senatorial District: 16, 18
EST COSTTO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
INDIVIDUAL FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJECT IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJSEGMENTS TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 129 28 0 0
• SR 1/US113A 80% FHWA 60 PE 60C*
• US 13 / Peach Basket Road 100% ST 15 PE 1580% FHWA 138 C 13880% FHWA 35 PE 35
• Thompsonville Overpass 80% FHWA 500 PE 500
• Auxiliary Lane Upgrades 80% FHWA 75 PE 75
All $ X 1,000
SR 1 AND US 13 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS, KENT COUNTY (CONTINUED)
A. SR 1/US113A B. US 13 / Peach Basket Road (Felton)
C. Thompsonville Overpass
13
BA
SK
ET
RDN
RD
MAIN ST
TU
RK
EY
PO
INT
RDT
OM
AH
AW
KLN
EVENS RD
PLYMOUTH RD
PEACHBASKET RD
WA
LNU
TS
T
ANDREWS LAKE RD
DSTATE RD
INDIA
NPOIN
TRD
HA
SE
RD
CA
NTER
BU
RY
RD
S.D
UP
ON
TH
WY
PICKW
ICK
BLVD
COPPERFIELD LA
DICKENS LA
KIMBE
RLY
WAY
JENNIFERLA
SUMMON
ERS
TALE
LA
YOEMANSTALE
LA
GREENCT
KERRYCIR
WE
ST
SEWELLST
ST
W. SEWELL
WOODS EDGE LA
BR
AN
CH
ST
LO
VE
RS
LA
COURTNEY LA
COURTNEY LA
DEEP WOODS CT
ER
INAVE
RY
ANC
T
KBERRY RD
OO
DD
R
SUMACDR
DR
DAILEY
R.
MA
IN
TE
MP
L
ST
GU
ILD
E
ST
CH
APPALACHIAN DRVINEYARD LA
WIN
FR
ED
DR
OR
CH
ARD
AV
E
BERRY TO
PR
ATTS
BR
AN
KENT AVECAROLINE AVE
NE
WC
AS
TLE
AVE
MEMORIAL AVE
NF
OR
D ST
EAS
TS
T
NIL
EST
JEFFERSON STLUFFS ALLEY
GA
YST
E. R
. R.
AV
E
CORDRAYBUTTERWORTHST
HIGH ST
STST
W.
R.R
.A
VE
NORTH
GA
RE
YD
R
EL K
DR
ELK DR
GELDEN RD
GE
LD
EN
RD
13
BA
SK
ET
RDN
RD
MAIN ST
TU
RK
EY
PO
INT
RDT
OM
AH
AW
KLN
EVENS RD
PLYMOUTH RD
PEACHBASKET RD
WA
LNU
TS
T
ANDREWS LAKE RD
DSTATE RD
INDIA
NPOIN
TRD
HA
SE
RD
CA
NTER
BU
RY
RD
S.D
UP
ON
TH
WY
PICKW
ICK
BLVD
COPPERFIELD LA
DICKENS LA
KIMBE
RLY
WAY
JENNIFERLA
SUMMON
ERS
TALE
LA
YOEMANSTALE
LA
GREENCT
KERRYCIR
WE
ST
SEWELLST
ST
W. SEWELL
WOODS EDGE LA
BR
AN
CH
ST
LO
VE
RS
LA
COURTNEY LA
COURTNEY LA
DEEP WOODS CT
ER
INAVE
RY
ANC
T
KBERRY RD
OO
DD
R
SUMACDR
DR
DAILEY
R.
MA
IN
TE
MP
L
ST
GU
ILD
E
ST
CH
APPALACHIAN DRVINEYARD LA
WIN
FR
ED
DR
OR
CH
ARD
AV
E
BERRY TO
PR
ATTS
BR
AN
KENT AVECAROLINE AVE
NE
WC
AS
TLE
AVE
MEMORIAL AVE
NF
OR
D ST
EAS
TS
T
NIL
EST
JEFFERSON STLUFFS ALLEY
GA
YST
E. R
. R.
AV
E
CORDRAYBUTTERWORTHST
HIGH ST
STST
W.
R.R
.A
VE
NORTH
GA
RE
YD
R
EL K
DR
ELK DR
GELDEN RD
GE
LD
EN
RD
1
113
HILL
RD
BO
WM
AN
RD
OW
LN
TUBMILL POND
RD
TU
BM
ILL
PO
ND
RD
OLD CEMETARY RD
CIC
AD
AL
N
PARISKIRBY
RD
ITCHETT
RD
LOG CABIN RD
JEN
KIN
SR
D
BIG
STO
NE
BE
AC
HR
D
BIG
STO
NE
BE
AC
HERING RD
GREENH
OU
SER
TORBERT RD
THO
MPS
ON
VILL
ER
D
KELLER
AVE
1
113
HILL
RD
BO
WM
AN
RD
OW
LN
TUBMILL POND
RD
TU
BM
ILL
PO
ND
RD
OLD CEMETARY RD
CIC
AD
AL
N
PARISKIRBY
RD
ITCHETT
RD
LOG CABIN RD
JEN
KIN
SR
D
BIG
STO
NE
BE
AC
HR
D
BIG
STO
NE
BE
AC
HERING RD
GREENH
OU
SER
TORBERT RD
THO
MPS
ON
VILL
ER
D
KELLER
AVE
WALKER ROAD, KENTON ROAD TO SAULSBURY ROAD, SAFETY
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The proposed improvements consist of pavementrehabilitation; construction of shoulders and sidewalks on both sides of Walker Road; minorintersection improvements to accommodate bicycles; and minordrainage improvements. Some utility relocations will be necessary, aswell as limited acquisition of right of way and easements. The entireroadway will be overlaid with new pavement and re-striped.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Heavy residential development in thearea has led to an increase in traffic volumes and congestion along a0.8 mile long corridor.
County: KentMunicipality: DoverProgram Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 31Senatorial District: 17
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004-2006
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/99-6/00 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/06PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 800 489 0
100% ST 271 PE 271100% ST 800 R/W 800
80% FHWA 2,446 C 2,446
All $ X 1,000
8
SAU
LSB
UR
YR
D
WALKER RD
FORREST AVE
KENTON RD
BU
RNIN
GTRE
ER
D.
HAZELTINE RD.
SHINNECOCK
ROAD
CA
RN
OU
STI
ER
D.
MA
PLE
DA
LEA
VE
.
ASHCT.
DR
IVE
AR
BOR
DR.
HA
RM
ON
YL
A.
NORTH
CA
RO
LINE
PL
.T
EA
LC
T.
CO
UR
TS
IDE
DR
.
BIC
EN
TE
NN
IAL
BLV
D.
DECLARAT ION
DR.
PA
TR
IOT
DR
.
FRE
ED
OM
PL.
FREEDOM
DR
.
LIBERTY DR.
COLONYDR.
ME
ETIN
GH
OU
SE
LA
.COBBLESTONELA.
CO
NTI
NENTA
LDR
.
OLD
FLINT
CIR.
DWIGHT
CT.WOODROW
CT.
ANDREWDR.
WASHINGTON
GEO.DR.
RU
TH
ER
FO
RD
CT
.
GREEN
BLADEDR.
LAMPLIGHTER
LA.
CO
LD
SP
RIN
GP
L.
ST
ON
EB
RO
OK
PL.
FIELDSTONE
PL.
PEW
TE
R
CT
.
MADISON CT.
PA
UL
RE
VE
RE
CT
.
CLARA ST E
PL
CARVER
IND
EP
EN
DA
NC
E
BL V
D
JEFFERSON CT
ADAMS CT
TO
N
T
GREENWAYLA
DR
HAMPTON
FOXHALL
DR
STONEY
DR
TALLOWICK
BRIARWOODLA
CT
CA
RN
OU
ST
IE
WINGED
FOOT CT
SC
IOT
OC
T
ECT
TURNBERRY
DR
CIR
KEN
TC
IR
GE
DR
HITCHINGPOST
DR
CO
BB
LE
RS
LA
HERITAGEDR
NA
VE AV
E
8
SAU
LSB
UR
YR
D
WALKER RD
FORREST AVE
KENTON RD
BU
RNIN
GTRE
ER
D.
HAZELTINE RD.
SHINNECOCK
ROAD
CA
RN
OU
STI
ER
D.
MA
PLE
DA
LEA
VE
.
ASHCT.
DR
IVE
AR
BOR
DR.
HA
RM
ON
YL
A.
NORTH
CA
RO
LINE
PL
.T
EA
LC
T.
CO
UR
TS
IDE
DR
.
BIC
EN
TE
NN
IAL
BLV
D.
DECLARAT ION
DR.
PA
TR
IOT
DR
.
FRE
ED
OM
PL.
FREEDOM
DR
.
LIBERTY DR.
COLONYDR.
ME
ETIN
GH
OU
SE
LA
.COBBLESTONELA.
CO
NTI
NENTA
LDR
.
OLD
FLINT
CIR.
DWIGHT
CT.WOODROW
CT.
ANDREWDR.
WASHINGTON
GEO.DR.
RU
TH
ER
FO
RD
CT
.
GREEN
BLADEDR.
LAMPLIGHTER
LA.
CO
LD
SP
RIN
GP
L.
ST
ON
EB
RO
OK
PL.
FIELDSTONE
PL.
PEW
TE
R
CT
.
MADISON CT.
PA
UL
RE
VE
RE
CT
.
CLARA ST E
PL
CARVER
IND
EP
EN
DA
NC
E
BL V
D
JEFFERSON CT
ADAMS CT
TO
N
T
GREENWAYLA
DR
HAMPTON
FOXHALL
DR
STONEY
DR
TALLOWICK
BRIARWOODLA
CT
CA
RN
OU
ST
IE
WINGED
FOOT CT
SC
IOT
OC
T
ECT
TURNBERRY
DR
CIR
KEN
TC
IR
GE
DR
HITCHINGPOST
DR
CO
BB
LE
RS
LA
HERITAGEDR
NA
VE AV
E
US113 / THOMPSONVILLE INTERCHANGE
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Construct a grade-separated interchange at thesignalized intersection of SR1 and Thompsonville Road (K19), along with a connectorto Church Hill Road (K404) and removal of median crossovers.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To enhance safety, improvetraffic flow in accordance with the SR1 Corridor CapacityPreservation Program and provide an alternate route to accesswest Milford.
County: KentMunicipality: DoverProgram Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 33Senatorial District: 16,18
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 200 3,375 1,820 0
80% FHWA 1,000 PE 1,000100% ST 3,200 R/W 3,375
80% AC FHWA 8,400 C 9,099
All $ X 1,000
1
113
HILL
RD
BO
WM
AN
RD
OW
LN
TUBMILL POND
RD
TU
BM
ILL
PO
ND
RD
OLD CEMETARY RD
CIC
AD
AL
N
PARISKIRBY
RD
ITCHETT
RD
LOG CABIN RD
JEN
KIN
SR
D
BIG
STO
NE
BE
AC
HR
D
BIG
STO
NE
BE
AC
HERING RD
GREENH
OU
SER
TORBERT RD
THO
MPS
ON
VILL
ER
D
KELLER
AVE
1
113
HILL
RD
BO
WM
AN
RD
OW
LN
TUBMILL POND
RD
TU
BM
ILL
PO
ND
RD
OLD CEMETARY RD
CIC
AD
AL
N
PARISKIRBY
RD
ITCHETT
RD
LOG CABIN RD
JEN
KIN
SR
D
BIG
STO
NE
BE
AC
HR
D
BIG
STO
NE
BE
AC
HERING RD
GREENH
OU
SER
TORBERT RD
THO
MPS
ON
VILL
ER
D
KELLER
AVE
BR237 ON S 46 OVER GRAVELLY BRANCH, SEAFORD
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will includereplacement of bridge with a corrugated metal arch with riprap at theentrance and exit.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andranked 104th on the bridge deficiency list.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 35,39Senatorial District: 19
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,062 248 0 0 0
21-076-01 100% ST 150 PE 150100% ST 44 R/W
80% FHWA 1,018 C
All $ X 1,000
DOVERD
KIN
GR
D
CO
NC
OR
H
ESK
RID
GE
RD
RD RD
PINEVIE
ST
ST
BEE
CH
LA
BURTON ST
MAINST
EX
PITTRD
WILKIN
SONDR
CHESTNUTLA
HA
RB
OR
SN
UG
DR
SURREY
DR
KENM
ORE
FAYMAURYAVE
ELM ST
CHARLES PINE
DOVERD
KIN
GR
D
CO
NC
OR
H
ESK
RID
GE
RD
RD RD
PINEVIE
ST
ST
BEE
CH
LA
BURTON ST
MAINST
EX
PITTRD
WILKIN
SONDR
CHESTNUTLA
HA
RB
OR
SN
UG
DR
SURREY
DR
KENM
ORE
FAYMAURYAVE
ELM ST
CHARLES PINE
BR350 ON S 72 OVER RACCOON POND, SPILLWAY, LAUREL
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace timber bridge and spillway with concretestructure on pile supported abutments with a steel sheet pile spillway andsluice gate. Place guardrail at approaches. Place riprap at spillway andunder the bridge.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andfunctionally obsolete. It is ranked 65th on the deficiency list.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 40Senatorial District: 21
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 890 191 0 0 0
100% ST 126 PE 126100% ST 16 R/W
80% FHWA 874 C
All $ X 1,000
24
GOOSE NEST RD
WH
ALE
YS
RD
TR
AP
LITTLE HILL RD
SA
MU
EL
HI
R POND RD
HU
DS
ON
RD
OODY RD
LEH
ILLR
D
HUDSON DR
X
24
GOOSE NEST RD
WH
ALE
YS
RD
TR
AP
LITTLE HILL RD
SA
MU
EL
HI
R POND RD
HU
DS
ON
RD
OODY RD
LEH
ILLR
D
HUDSON DR
X
BR365N AND 365S ON NORTH AND SOUTH US 13, RECORDS POND, EASTOF LAUREL
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitate existingstructures including pile jackets, concrete deck overlay, jointreplacement, and upgrade existing bridge rail and guardrail. Onelane of traffic on each bridge will be maintained duringreconstruction.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridges are functionallyobsolete and are ranked 89th and 91st, respectively, on thedeficiency list.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 222 0 0 0
100% ST 166 PE 16680% FHWA 1,108 C 1,108
All $ X 1,000
24
CHIPMANS POND RD
CH
IPM
AN
SCHASE
DR
CREEKRD
MARYLAND
C
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
HEARN AVEHORSEY AVEALLEN
AVE
AVE
AVEA
VE
BO
YC
E
LAUREL
ELL
ISP
RE
TT
YMA
N
PU
RN
ELL
DR
WH
ITE
LAKE
DRW
AT
ER
VIE
WAVEAV
E
GO
VE
RNO
RS
LAN
SIN
G
KIN
G
ST
STCOOPER
FRONT
WILLO
W
ST
PIN
ES
T
LEWIS
DR
LACHIPMANS
BROAD
LAKESIDEDR
SH
OR
TA
VE
WILS
ON
SU
SSE
XA
VE
BRO
OK
LYN
AVE
DELAW
ARE
AVEWASHINGTON
GEORGETOWN
RO
DANIELS
AL
AVE
ST
SIXTH
TON
IGHTH
DE
SH
I ELD T
FOURTH STFIFTH ST
SYC
AMO
RELA
WALNUT
WILSONST
CU
L VER
DR
ST
CHIPMAN
SP
RU
CE
STVE
24
CHIPMANS POND RD
CH
IPM
AN
S
CHASE
DR
CREEKRD
MARYLAND
C
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
HEARN AVEHORSEY AVEALLEN
AVE
AVE
AVEA
VE
BO
YC
E
LAUREL
ELL
ISP
RE
TT
YMA
N
PU
RN
ELL
DR
WH
ITE
LAKE
DRW
AT
ER
VIE
WAVEAV
E
GO
VE
RNO
RS
LAN
SIN
G
KIN
G
ST
STCOOPER
FRONT
WILLO
W
ST
PIN
ES
T
LEWIS
DR
LACHIPMANS
BROAD
LAKESIDEDR
SH
OR
TA
VE
WILS
ON
SU
SSE
XA
VE
BRO
OK
LYN
AVE
DELAW
ARE
AVEWASHINGTON
GEORGETOWN
RO
DANIELS
AL
AVE
ST
SIXTH
TON
IGHTH
DE
SH
I ELD T
FOURTH STFIFTH ST
SYC
AMO
RELA
WALNUT
WILSONST
CU
L VER
DR
ST
CHIPMAN
SP
RU
CE
STVE
BR447 ON SR 54 OVER BLACK WATER DITCH, EAST OF DAGSBORO
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace existing rigidframe.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 45th on the bridge deficiency list.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 38Senatorial District: 20
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 80
21-073-01 100% ST 60 PE 60100% ST 10 R/W 10
80% FHWA 400 C 400
All $ X 1,000
26
BALLASWO
OD
AC
RE
SR
D
GR
AY
RD
REEK RD
WEST
RD OMAR RD BLA
CK
W
BR
EA
SU
RE
RD
HIC
KO
RY
MA
NO
RR
D
VINES CREEK RDP
OW
WH
ISP
ER
ING
CEDAR CT
ST
EV
EN
DR
LA
HID
DE
N
ACRE DR
TR
AN
QU
IL ITY
LAN
E
HIDE A WAYCT
SHAWNEEIND
CREE
TOMAHAW
APACHE PASS
CHIPPIAWA
DR
SQUAW LA
SHAWNEE DRHAWATHA BLVD
MO
HI C
AN
DR
HA
WA
T HA
BLV
DPONYDR
TIMB
ER
ED
GE
DR
SYLVAN VUE DR
LEONA
WINGATE CT
NO
RM
ALE
EC
T
ELA
G
26
BALLASWO
OD
AC
RE
SR
D
GR
AY
RD
REEK RD
WEST
RD OMAR RD BLA
CK
W
BR
EA
SU
RE
RD
HIC
KO
RY
MA
NO
RR
D
VINES CREEK RDP
OW
WH
ISP
ER
ING
CEDAR CT
ST
EV
EN
DR
LA
HID
DE
N
ACRE DR
TR
AN
QU
IL ITY
LAN
E
HIDE A WAYCT
SHAWNEEIND
CREE
TOMAHAW
APACHE PASS
CHIPPIAWA
DR
SQUAW LA
SHAWNEE DRHAWATHA BLVD
MO
HI C
AN
DR
HA
WA
T HA
BLV
DPONYDR
TIMB
ER
ED
GE
DR
SYLVAN VUE DR
LEONA
WINGATE CT
NO
RM
ALE
EC
T
ELA
G
BR526 AND 527 ON BETTS POND, MILLSBORO
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace BR527 with concrete frame structureand sheet pile spillway. Replace BR526 with concrete box. Place timber guardrail atbridge approaches. Stabilize slopes.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Bridges have low structural capacityand narrow width. BR526 is ranked 67th and BR527 is ranked 11th onthe bridge deficiency list. Both bridges are functionally obsolete.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 41Senatorial District: 20
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 572 0 0 0
99-073-01 100% ST 1,200 C 1,200
All $ X 1,000
IR
ARD
BE
TTS
PO
ND
RD
JERSEY RD
HO
LLY
THOMPSONVILLE RDBARK POND RD
OL RD HOUST
OA
KA
VE
LAK
ES
IDE
LA
KE
RLY
NDR
PINE LODGEADDITION
CARLISLE
CUBALO ST
RIVER DRAT
KIN
SS
TJONES ALLEYMOORE AL
STATE ST
MCHSU
SS
EX
LLE
Y
ELL
ISST
PO
ND
ALL
EY
OD
WIN
STPINE STMONR
IR
ARD
BE
TTS
PO
ND
RD
JERSEY RD
HO
LLY
THOMPSONVILLE RDBARK POND RD
OL RD HOUST
OA
KA
VE
LAK
ES
IDE
LA
KE
RLY
N
DR
PINE LODGEADDITION
CARLISLE
CUBALO ST
RIVER DRAT
KIN
SS
TJONES ALLEYMOORE AL
STATE ST
MCHSU
SS
EX
LLE
Y
ELL
ISST
PO
ND
ALL
EY
OD
WIN
STPINE STMONR
BR586 ON MILLSBORO HIGHWAY (S 26) OVER POCOMOKE RIVER,NORTH OF GUMBORO
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements focus on replacement of the existingrigid frame with a precast rigid frame, with riprap placed to protect thefoundation.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurally deficient andranks 124th on the bridge deficiency list.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 41Senatorial District: 21
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 344 0 0 0
20-073-05 100% ST 5 R/W 5100% ST 344 C 344
All $ X 1,000
30
LYN
CH
RD
LOWES CROSSING RD
FOX
HOUN
DLAN
E
PE
AR
TR
EE
RD
BRADFORD RD
JO
CA
YU
GA
DR
30
LYN
CH
RD
LOWES CROSSING RD
FOX
HOUN
DLAN
E
PE
AR
TR
EE
RD
BRADFORD RD
JO
CA
YU
GA
DR
BR815N ON SR 1 NB OVER WAPLES POND
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Replace concrete slab bridge with prestressedconcrete adjacent box beam bridge; make safety improvements at approaches; and placerip-rap to prevent scour at the foundation.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is structurallydeficient and ranks 81st on the deficiency list.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 36Senatorial District: 18
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 215 0 0 0
21-071-03 100% ST 150 PE 150100% ST 10 R/W 10
80% FHWA 1,026 C 1,026
All $ X 1,000
1
CEDARC
REEK
CRES RDLITTLE
NECKRD
TRUITT RD
CLIFTON RD
DEEP BRANCH RD
Y
ITH
CT
PINE DRMOUNTAIN LAUREL DRSYLVAN DRRED CEDAR DR
WHITE CEDAR DR
OA
KLA
1
CEDARC
REEK
CRES RDLITTLE
NECKRD
TRUITT RD
CLIFTON RD
DEEP BRANCH RD
Y
ITH
CT
PINE DRMOUNTAIN LAUREL DRSYLVAN DRRED CEDAR DR
WHITE CEDAR DR
OA
KLA
US113, MD STATE LINE NORTH OF DAGSBORO
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project was split into three separate phases. The first, US 113, North of Millsboro to S321 is --currently under construction. The second, from North of Dagsboro to North of Millsboro was recently awarded. The remaining section fromUS113, North of Dagsboro to North of Millsboro – will include resurface the existing pavement; make intersection and drainage improvements atSR 24; and incorporate various minor safety improvements.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Roadway over the entire distance needs to be replaced due to deteriorating pavement.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System PreservationRepresentative District: 38, 41Senatorial District: 20, 21
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 5,374 0 0 0
97-109-02 80% FHWA 15,615 C 15,614
All $ X 1,000
US113, MD STATE LINE NORTH OF DAGSBORO (CONTINUED)
17
113
JAYPATCH RD
POLLY BRANCH RD
BISHOPVILLE R
LYNCH RD
HU
DS
ON
RD
HU
DS
ON
RD
BIXLER RD
LIGHTHO
GUM RD
RAB
RD
PE
PP
ER
CYPRESS RD
PHILLIPS RD
BAKER RD
HOOSIER ST EXT
MCCABE RD
CLIFF RD
PARKE
ROXANA RDSC
HO
OL
ST
SMITH AVEFIELDAVE
CLENDANIEL AVECEMETARY RD
WE
ST
RR
AV
EE
AS
TR
RA
VE
LON
GA
VE HOLLO
WAY ST
DUNES ST EXT
E. TANGLEWOOD DR
W. TANGLEWOOD DR
GUMBORORDHOSIE
RSTREET
DUKESSTREET
CHURCHSTREET
E.RR
AV
E
BAKER
PAR
KE
RDA
VIS
ALLE
YA
VE
ELLISALLEY
MCCABEST
RUTH ST
HELLEN ST
GEORGA ST
BEN
NE
TT
ST
RO
DG
ER
SW
ILLIAM
SS
TSECONDFIR
ST
WA
LNU
TST
HA
LL
CHU
RCH
LAHA
ND
YLA
DE
RR
ICK
SON
LA
FENWICK ROAD
C.H.
17
113
JAYPATCH RD
POLLY BRANCH RD
BISHOPVILLE R
LYNCH RD
HU
DS
ON
RD
HU
DS
ON
RD
BIXLER RD
LIGHTHO
GUM RD
RAB
RD
PE
PP
ER
CYPRESS RD
PHILLIPS RD
BAKER RD
HOOSIER ST EXT
MCCABE RD
CLIFF RD
PARKE
ROXANA RDSC
HO
OL
ST
SMITH AVEFIELDAVE
CLENDANIEL AVECEMETARY RD
WE
ST
RR
AV
EE
AS
TR
RA
VE
LON
GA
VE HOLLO
WAY ST
DUNES ST EXT
E. TANGLEWOOD DR
W. TANGLEWOOD DR
GUMBORORDHOSIE
RSTREET
DUKESSTREET
CHURCHSTREET
E.RR
AV
E
BAKER
PAR
KE
RDA
VIS
ALLE
YA
VE
ELLISALLEY
MCCABEST
RUTH ST
HELLEN ST
GEORGA ST
BEN
NE
TT
ST
RO
DG
ER
SW
ILLIAM
SS
TSECONDFIR
ST
WA
LNU
TST
HA
LL
CHU
RCH
LAHA
ND
YLA
DE
RR
ICK
SON
LA
FENWICK ROAD
C.H.
26
20
113
26
STUM
TOW
NS
EN
DS
RD
OMAR RD
HONOLULURD
MU
RR
AY
RD
DU
KES
RD
VINES CREEK RD
CLAYTON ST
NINE FOOT RD
GU DRE
AV
E
PYLE CENT
ARMORY RD
CL
AY
TO
NA
VE
MA
INS
TTREE RD
GUM TREE RD
SWAM
PRD
IELD RD
QU
AIL
RU
NR
D
BLUEBERRY LANE
BA
KE
RS
RD
BERRY RD
MO
OR
ES
T
POMME LAPECHE ST
WILL
IAMS
ST
HICKORY ST
DAISEY AVEMAINST
RE
ED
STTH
ATCH
ERST
WALNUTMILL STDOVER
ANKFORD
AVE
ST
DUMP
DE
LAW
AR
E ST
KNOXST
GR
EE
N
R.R
.ST
CAREYST
GU
MS
TAPPLE
STST
RR
ST
CEEBEE
SHOCKLEY
FLO
OD
ST
GUMS
AVE
SW
AM
PROAD
R.R
. AV
ELINGO
RDCAN
AL
STHAZZARDST
HE
LMST
CE
GE
OR
GE
SA
VE
OMAR ST
WARRINGTOST
CHURCHPINEST
ST
WS
TLES
ST
SU
SSEXST
26
20
113
26
STUM
TOW
NS
EN
DS
RD
OMAR RD
HONOLULURD
MU
RR
AY
RD
DU
KES
RD
VINES CREEK RD
CLAYTON ST
NINE FOOT RD
GU DRE
AV
E
PYLE CENT
ARMORY RD
CL
AY
TO
NA
VE
MA
INS
T
TREE RD
GUM TREE RD
SWAM
PRD
IELD RD
QU
AIL
RU
NR
D
BLUEBERRY LANE
BA
KE
RS
RD
BERRY RD
MO
OR
ES
T
POMME LAPECHE ST
WILL
IAMS
ST
HICKORY ST
DAISEY AVEMAINST
RE
ED
STTH
ATCH
ERST
WALNUTMILL STDOVER
ANKFORD
AVE
ST
DUMP
DE
LAW
AR
E ST
KNOXST
GR
EE
N
R.R
.ST
CAREYST
GU
MS
TAPPLE
STST
RR
ST
CEEBEE
SHOCKLEY
FLO
OD
ST
GUMS
AVE
SW
AM
PROAD
R.R
. AV
ELINGO
RDCAN
AL
STHAZZARDST
HE
LMST
CE
GE
OR
GE
SA
VE
OMAR ST
WARRINGTOST
CHURCHPINEST
ST
WS
TLES
ST
SU
SSEXST
MILTON TRUCK BYPASS, FROM SR 5 TO SR 30
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To implement a truck bypass route around Milton, the following improvements are sought:
1. Intersection improvements at SR 5/S319 – This intersection is difficult for trucks to navigate. In addition, the road at this intersection “dips”. (Supported by the 1995Milton Truck Study).
2. S319 – This roadbed is inadequate for truck traffic and needs to be reconstructed with 8-foot shoulders to handle truck and vehicular traffic. (Supported by the 1995Milton Truck Study).
3. BR806 – This bridge is structurally sound, but functionally obsolete. This bridge will be widened without having to be replaced. (Supported by the 1995 Milton TruckStudy).
4. Intersection improvements at SR 30/S319 - This stop sign intersection is difficult for trucks to maneuver through. Left and right turning lanes are needed. (Supportedby the 1995 Milton Truck Study).
5. Replacement of BR918 – This bridge is narrow and has a very low elevation. A curve just north of the bridge has raised safety concerns, as it is used by Haz-Mat trucksthat cross over this millpond. (Supported by the 1995 Milton Truck Study).
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: For over 20 years the Town of Milton has been complaining about the truck traffic using SR 5 detracting from local quality of life. Theconstant rumbling of trucks using SR 5 causes deterioration to houses adjacent to SR 5, some of which are historically significant. In addition, truck traffic conflicts withpedestrian safety and maintenance of town utilities located under the SR 5 roadbed.
Area truckers, despite the Town’s opposition, continue to use SR 5 through the heart of town to access SR 1 Northbound. Truckers complained that the existing roads andlinkages outside town were inadequate to meet their needs for safe and efficient truck travel. In the fall of 1998, DelDOT’s Bureau of Traffic posted Alternative Truck Routesigns that directed trucks to the designated route around town. However, because the voluntary route does not meet truck traffic standards, use of this route cannot be enforced.Therefore, until the bypass improvements are completed, the truck traffic problem in town will continue.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
MILTON TRUCK BYPASS, FROM SR 5 TO SR 30 (CONTINUED)
BR806 on S319 AND BR918 on SR 30 S319, Reconstruction, S319 & SR 5, S319 & SR 30
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 282 10 390 0
100% ST 37 LOC/ENV 37100% ST 245 PE 245100% ST 10 R/W 10
80% FHWA 1,950 C 1,950
All $ X 1,000
S298 AND 299, REHABILITATION AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project consists of three phases of safety androadway improvements including:
• S298, from SR 24 to S 22: Place a 3’ pavement overlay 22’ wide; install closed drainage;curb the intersection at S 22; and create a turn lane to S 22 westbound and signalizeintersection. Ditching will also be addressed as needed.
• S298 at SR 24: Realignment as well as with lighting and safetyimprovements.
• S298 from S 22 to S299: 3’ pavement overlay for 22’ wide travel lanesand 4’ shoulders; curbs and gutters; sidewalks; and a closed drainagesystem. Other lighting and safety improvements will also be made.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Improve safety throughout the area.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 37, 38Senatorial District: 20
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 50 150 100 280
100% ST 50 LOC/ENV 50100% ST 150 PE 150100% ST 100 R/W 100
80% FHWA 1,400 C 1,400
All $ X 1,000
OAKOR
BANKSRD
GREENRD
SCHOO
LLA
EGION
RDIN
ITY
RD
AU
TU
MN
RD
BAYFARM
LONG NECK RD
DR
AN
GOWATER
RD
RY RD
ST
EV
EN
SO
N
PHILLIP OLLY LAKE RDHILL RD
FRIENDSHIP RD
CA
NN
ON
RD
MOUNT JOYRD
CAMP RD
ST
R
DR
AN
ER
D R
23
23
5
24
308
299
299
299A
298
298298
22
22
22
22C
298
24
24
298A
298
22
303303
303A
307
306A
297
307
308
302
297
304
306
301
279
G I S -T
D e la wa r e D O T
N
OAKOR
BANKSRD
GREENRD
SCHOO
LLA
EGION
RDIN
ITY
RD
AU
TU
MN
RD
BAYFARM
LONG NECK RD
DR
AN
GOWATER
RD
RY RD
ST
EV
EN
SO
N
PHILLIP OLLY LAKE RDHILL RD
FRIENDSHIP RD
CA
NN
ON
RD
MOUNT JOYRD
CAMP RD
ST
R
DR
AN
ER
D R
23
23
5
24
308
299
299
299A
298
298298
22
22
22
22C
298
24
24
298A
298
22
303303
303A
307
306A
297
307
308
302
297
304
306
301
279
G I S -T
D e la wa r e D O T
N
SR 1, DEWEY BEACH TO LEWES AND REHOBOTH CANAL,IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Construction of sidewalkson both sides of SR 1; median modifications; pavement anddrainage improvements; and intersection improvements, includingthe installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of DoddAvenue and SR 1. The project limits are from Salisbury Road to theLewes and Rehoboth Canal. Pavement rehabilitation along thelength of the roadway will also be undertaken.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To improve pedestrian safety andmake needed roadway improvements.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 37Senatorial District: 20
EST COSTINDIVIIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 985 1,040 0 0
Dewey Beach to Lewes and 100% ST 275 PE 275Rehoboth Canal 100% ST 985 R/W 985
80% FHWA 3,950 C 3,950
SR 1, Dewey Beach (Forgotten Mile), 80% FHWA 1,250 C 1,250Pavement Rehabilitation
All $ X 1,000
HEB
RO
NR
D
CO
UNT
RYCL
UB
RD
STAT
ER
D
BA
YV
IST
AR
D
BA
YR
D
1
1A1B
1AREHOBOTH
DEWEY BEACH
KENS INGTON
YARMOUTH
DARTMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
BLACKPOOL
BRADFORDBRIGHTON
BAMB URY
WA
Y
WAY
CO
NW
ALL
OX
FORD
EAST
SIDE
DR
LOO
P
LANDS
END
LO NDONCIRCIR
SHE
FF I
ELD
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
SHEFF
IELD
WAY
SO
ME
RSE
TST
AFF
ORD
SUF
FOL
KSU
RR
EY
BUCKINGHAMDR
E. LAKE
DR
AVE
AV E
AVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
DELAWAREWILMINGTONREHOBO TH
BA LTIMORE
OLIVE
VIRGINIA
COLU
MBI
A
T
GERAR ST
PARKAVE
COOKMANST
KENT ST KENTST
SUSSEX STSUSSEX
ST
AVE EXTREHOBOTHLA
KEAVE
CITYHALLD
R
MARYLAND3RD
ST
GERAR ST
EASTONST
FELTONST
HENL
GROVEST
CA
NA
LS
T6T
HS
TC
OUNTR
YCLU
BDR
HICKMAN
STOCKLEY
CO
UN
TRY
CL
UB
DR
SC
AR
BO
RO
UG
HA
V E
BA
YA
RD
AV
E
1ST
ST
PINE
TID S
T
BA
YH
AR
BOR
DR
NAUTILUS
CT
BAY
HAR
BO
RD
R
CANAL DR
BRIGANTINECT
SPIN
NAKER
CT
BU
RTO
NC
T
OCEAN VIEWAVE
PARK VIEWAVE
KY VIEW
AVE
AWARE
EAAIR
CENTER
ATLANTIC
AVE
AVE
AVE
ACE LAT
T
R
15
50
READ ST
MCKINLEY ST
BU
EN
DO
V
HAY
CHESAPEAKE ST
CAROLINA
JERSE YCULLE N
CHICAGO
WEST
ST LOUIS ST
HOUSTON
CLAYTON
SWEDES
SAULSBURY
NEW ORLEANS
BE LLEVUE
DAGSWORTHY
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ANDREWST
ELIZAB
ETH
DODD
CARLA
BAYVIEW
DUTCH
SWEDES
1ST2N
D
AVE
AVE
AVE
AV E
ST
RD
VENE
TIA
ND
R
SAULSBURYST
TERRACE
RD
ROBINSON DR
ANNIE
BW
ILLIA
MF
SMITHAVE
JAM
ESA
PINE LA
JOS
EPHIN
E
FBE
NSO
N
GEORGE
STST
STST
STST
MARTIN
GUTHRIE
QUILLENDAISEYBAY
PINEM
APL
E
CANAL RD
WASHIN
GTONST
LINC
OLN
STOCKLEY ST EXT
NEWCASTLE ST
EXT
SCHOOL LALE
EST
OLDBAY
RD
SCARBOROUGHST EXT
1ST STBASIN RD3RD ST
4TH ST5TH ST
6TH ST7TH ST
8TH ST9TH ST
10TH ST11TH ST
BALD
EA
GLE
RD
KEN
SIN
GTO
NR
DC
OR
NW
AL L
RD
LEEDS WAY
BAY
VIE
WR
D
CR
AZ
YL
A
KING
SBR
IDG
ER
D
BUCKINGHAM
DR
CO
RN
WALL
RD
CR
OYD
ON
RD
CAR
DIFF
RD
CANTE
RBE
RRY
LA
BRANCHWOOD DR
WEST SIDEDR
WHITE
OAK D
HARMON LA
EAG
LED
R
MARTIN ST
PHIL
LIP
SS
T
PHILLIPS ST
WASHINGTON
ST
MALLOY ST
CENTRAL AVE
HARMON ST
BURTON AVE
DUFFY
STN
ORW
OO
DST
DE DR
PENN STPROS PECT STQUEE N STLAKE
DR
ST LAWRENCE STRODNEYST
ST
ST
ST
STST
ST
ST
ST
ST
NORFOLKSTOCKLEY
NEW CASTLEHICKMAN
LA UREL
LAUREL
MUNSON STPHILADELPHIA
PHILADELPHIABROOKLYN AVEAV E
G I S -T
D e la wa r e D O T
N
HEB
RO
NR
D
CO
UNT
RYCL
UB
RD
STAT
ER
D
BA
YV
IST
AR
D
BA
YR
D
1
1A1B
1AREHOBOTH
DEWEY BEACH
KENS INGTON
YARMOUTH
DARTMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
BLACKPOOL
BRADFORDBRIGHTON
BAMB URY
WA
Y
WAY
CO
NW
ALL
OX
FORD
EAST
SIDE
DR
LOO
P
LANDS
END
LO NDONCIRCIR
SHE
FF I
ELD
RD
RD
RD
RD
RD
SHEFF
IELD
WAY
SO
ME
RSE
TST
AFF
ORD
SUF
F OL
KSU
RR
EY
BUCKINGHAMDR
E. LAKE
DR
AVE
AV E
AVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
DELAWAREWILMINGTONREHOBO TH
BA LTIMORE
OLIVE
VIRGINIA
COLU
MBI
A
T
GERAR ST
PARKAVE
COOKMANST
KENT ST KENTST
SUSSEX STSUSSEX
ST
AVE EXTREHOBOTH
LAKE
AVE
CITYHALLD
R
MARYLAND3RD
ST
GERAR ST
EASTONST
FELTONST
HENL
GROVEST
CA
NA
LS
T6T
HS
TC
OUNTR
YCLU
BDR
HICKMAN
STOCKLEY
CO
UN
TRY
CL
UB
DR
SC
AR
BO
RO
UG
HA
V E
BA
YA
RD
AV
E
1ST
ST
PINE
TID S
T
BA
YH
AR
BOR
DR
NAUTILUS
CT
BAY
HAR
BO
RD
R
CANAL DR
BRIGANTINECT
SPIN
NAKER
CT
BU
RTO
NC
T
OCEAN VIEWAVE
PARK VIEWAVE
KY VIEW
AVE
AWARE
EAAIR
CENTER
ATLANTIC
AVE
AVE
AVE
ACE LAT
T
R
15
50
READ ST
MCKINLEY ST
BU
EN
DO
V
HAY
CHESAPEAKE ST
CAROLINA
JERSE YCULLE N
CHICAGO
WEST
ST LOUIS ST
HOUSTON
CLAYTON
SWEDES
SAULSBURY
NEW ORLEANS
BE LLEVUE
DAGSWORTHY
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ANDREWST
ELIZAB
ETH
DODD
CARLA
BAYVIEW
DUTCH
SWEDES
1ST2N
D
AVE
AVE
AVE
AV E
ST
RD
VENE
TIA
ND
R
SAULSBURYST
TERRACE
RD
ROBINSON DR
ANNIE
BW
ILLIA
MF
SMITHAVE
JAM
ESA
PINE LA
JOS
EPHIN
E
FBE
NSO
N
GEORGE
STST
STST
STST
MARTIN
GUTHRIE
QUILLENDAISEYBAY
PINEM
APL
E
CANAL RD
WASHIN
GTONST
LINC
OLN
STOCKLEY ST EXT
NEWCASTLE ST
EXT
SCHOOL LALE
EST
OLDBAY
RD
SCARBOROUGHST EXT
1ST STBASIN RD3RD ST
4TH ST5TH ST
6TH ST7TH ST
8TH ST9TH ST
10TH ST11TH ST
BALD
EA
GLE
RD
KEN
SIN
GTO
NR
DC
OR
NW
AL L
RD
LEEDS WAY
BAY
VIE
WR
D
CR
AZ
YL
A
KING
SB R
IDG
ER
D
BUCKINGHAM
DR
CO
RN
WALL
RD
CR
OYD
ON
RD
CAR
DIFF
RD
CANTE
RBE
RRY
LA
BRANCHWOOD DR
WEST SIDEDR
WHITE
OAK D
HARMON LA
EAG
LED
R
MARTIN ST
PHIL
LIP
SS
T
PHILLIPS ST
WASHINGTON
ST
MALLOY ST
CENTRAL AVE
HARMON ST
BURTON AVE
DUFFY
STN
ORW
OO
DST
DE DR
PENN STPROS PECT STQUEE N STLAKE
DR
ST LAWRENCE STRODNEYST
ST
ST
ST
STST
ST
ST
ST
ST
NORFOLKSTOCKLEY
NEW CASTLEHICKMAN
LA UREL
LAUREL
MUNSON STPHILADELPHIA
PHILADELPHIABROOKLYN AVEAV E
G I S -T
D e la wa r e D O T
N
SR 1, GRID IMPROVEMENTS, REHOBOTH AVENUE TO FIVE POINTS
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The proposed projects listed below are the result ofPhase I of the SR 1 Grid Study. Further development of proposed solutions and alternates aswell as public involvement will be needed before these projects canmove forward to design.
1. Nassau Ped/Bike Connection: This project provides a newrelocated section for a portion of the AmericanDiscovery/Millennium Trail, making use of the existing gradeseparation between SR 1 and the DelDOT-owned railroad tracks atNassau. It would provide a ped/bike crossing of SR 1 away from theFive Points intersection. Future expansion to the east and westwould need to be done by others as part of other projects.
2. Rehoboth Entrance Improvements: This project improves operations and safety at the SR1/1A split by providing a new access route connection to Rehoboth Avenue. It would use theexisting SR 1 grade separation north of the Lewes and Rehoboth Canal and follow analignment along the presently undeveloped Canal Landing area. This project requires acquisition of right-of-way from Canal Landing and the Corps of Engineers. Itincludes elements that were requested by the community, such as satisfying the request of the West Rehoboth community concerning Hebron Road, and providing anoption that would allow for the relocation of buses from State Road south of the Canal. It also would provide access to the Canal area by motorists, bicyclists, andpedestrians and connect with DNREC’s Lewes to Rehoboth multi-use trail north of Hebron Road.
SR 1/Rehoboth Avenue Intersection Improvement: This project would increase the capacity at the intersection of SR 1 and Rehoboth Avenue; expedite the flow oftraffic leaving the beach; and allow more flexibility in controlling traffic signal operations. It includes the addition of a third northbound lane on SR1 approachingRehoboth Avenue and a second westbound lane on Rehoboth Avenue approaching SR 1.
3. Nassau Park-and-Ride Lot: This project is a 600 to 700 vehicle park-and-ride facility that would be located north of Five Points to intercept traffic from the northdestined for Rehoboth Beach and Lewes/Cape Henlopen. The park-and-ride lot would have shared use potential and be coordinated with the SR265 grade separation beingplanned as part of the SR 1 Corridor Preservation Program north of Nassau. As part of the operation of the park-and-ride lot, it is anticipated there would be shuttle busservices into the resort areas and that the lot could be the site for bus transfers.
4. Ped/Bike Connection: Old Landing Road to Rehoboth: This project provides a Bike Route 1 connection from Old Landing Road/Airport Road vicinity south to theentrance to Rehoboth on the west side of SR1. It involves the construction of a high-grade bike/ped facility that connects local communities and satisfies citizen interests.Some sections involve shoulder improvements based on typical sections developed for this project (e.g. Old Landing Road, Airport Road, Phillips Street, and MartinStreet). Other sections would be on new right-of-way. The alignment of the ped/bike facility would also connect to the existing Rehoboth park-and-ride lot and DelDOT’sproposed SR1 ped/bike intersection improvements at Church Street and Bald Eagle Road.
NRD
MUNCY BRANCH RD
WOLF NECK RD
HO
LLAN
DG
LAD
ERD
HEB
RO
NR
D
UN
TRY
CLU
BR
D
OLD
LA
ND
ING
R
STA
TER
D
BA
YV
IST
AR
D
BA
YR
GIL
L
CLAY RD
HARDRDD
KIN
GS
HIG
HW
AY
BELLTOW
NRD
WARRINGTON RD
POSTAL LA
CEDARGRO
VERD
WAR
DR
D
MULBERRYKNOLL RD
RO
BIN
SVI
LLE
RD
EBBSLANDIN
GRD
TS RD JOH
NJ.
WIL
LIA
MS
HW
Y
RG RD
1
1A
1A
1B
9
23
24
REHOBOTH
HENLOPEN ACRES
1
1A1B
9
24
23
1A
NRD
MUNCY BRANCH RD
WOLF NECK RD
HO
LLAN
DG
LAD
ERD
HEB
RO
NR
D
UN
TRY
CLU
BR
D
OLD
LA
ND
ING
R
STA
TER
D
BA
YV
IST
AR
D
BA
YR
GIL
L
CLAY RD
HARDRDD
KIN
GS
HIG
HW
AY
BELLTOW
NRD
WARRINGTON RD
POSTAL LA
CEDARGRO
VERD
WAR
DR
D
MULBERRYKNOLL RD
RO
BIN
SVI
LLE
RD
EBBSLANDIN
GRD
TS RD JOH
NJ.
WIL
LIA
MS
HW
Y
RG RD
1
1A
1A
1B
9
23
24
REHOBOTH
HENLOPEN ACRES
1
1A1B
9
24
23
1A
SR 1, GRID IMPROVEMENTS, REHOBOTH AVENUE TO FIVE POINTS (CONTINUED)
5. Lewes to Rehoboth Bike Path: Construction of a bikeway linking the cities of Lewes and Rehoboth Beach independent of existing roads. This will be a 12’ wideapproximately 4.8 mile concrete bike path, generally following the abandoned rail corridor of the old Lewes and Rehoboth Rail Line.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 37Senatorial District: 20
EST COSTINDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 420 2,610 5,350
1. Nassau Bike/Ped. Connection 100% ST 60 LOC/ENV 30 30100% ST 90 PE 90100% ST 100 R/W 100
80% FHWA 1,000 C 1,000
2. Rehoboth Entrance Imp’s 100% ST 120 LOC/ENV 40 80SR 1 / Rehoboth Ave Int imp 100% ST 500 PE 200 300
100% ST 2,400 R/W 1,000 1,40080% FHWA 5,600 C 5,600
3. Nassau Park and Ride Lot 100% ST 30 LOC/ENV 30100% ST 110 PE 110100% ST 2,400 R/W 2,400
80% FHWA 3,000 C 3,000
4. Bike/Ped Connection 100% ST 20 LOC/ENV 20Old Landing Road to Rehoboth P&R 100% ST 100 PE 100
100% ST 950 R/W 95080% FHWA 1,400 C 1,400
5. Lewes to Rehoboth Bike Path 100% ST 500 C 500
SR 24 AND SR 5, LONG NECK ROAD, NORTHEAST OF MILLSBORO, INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, SAFETY
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Widen each approach toprovide separate left, through, and right turning lanes. This projectwill include bike lanes for SR 24.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Improved safety for the travellingpublic. This project has been a high priority at Sussex County CIPhearings.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 37, 38Senatorial District: 20
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 331 0 0 0
91-003-01 100% ST 137 PE 137100% ST 168 R/W 168
80% FHWA 1,466 C 1,466
All $ X 1,000
O
BANKSRD
GREENRD
SCHOO
LLA
NRDRD
AU
TU
MN
RD
BAY
LONG NECK RD
AN
GATERRD
ERY RD
ST
EV
EN
SPHIL RDS HILL RD
FRIENDSHIP RD
CA
NN
ON
RD
MOUNTJOY
R
DCAMP RD
DR
AN
E
23
23
5
24
299
299
298
298298
22
22
22
22C
298
24
24
298A
298
303303
303A
307
306A
297
307
308
302
297
304
306
301
G I S -T
D e la wa r e D O T
N
O
BANKSRD
GREENRD
SCHOO
LLA
NRDRD
AU
TU
MN
RD
BAY
LONG NECK RD
AN
GATERRD
ERY RD
ST
EV
EN
SPHIL RDS HILL RD
FRIENDSHIP RD
CA
NN
ON
RD
MOUNTJOY
R
DCAMP RD
DR
AN
E
23
23
5
24
299
299
298
298298
22
22
22
22C
298
24
24
298A
298
303303
303A
307
306A
297
307
308
302
297
304
306
301
G I S -T
D e la wa r e D O T
N
SR 26, ASSAWOMAN BAY TO US113
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: In conjunction with the SR 26 Advisory Committee, DelDOT developed specific recommendations to address theidentified project needs. The recommendations were presented at a Public Workshop in August 1999. The recommended improvements, which aredesigned to improve the operational efficiency of SR 26 and the surrounding local road network, are listed below:
1. Intersections• SR 26/SR 54/S365 (Clarksville) – Realign intersection.• SR 26 and intersections with Railway Road, Grants Road, Woodland Road and Windmill Road – Install bypass lanes/left-turn lanes.• SR 26/Old Mill Road – Improve signal timings.• SR 26/Central Avenue – Install SB right-turn lane, install EB right turn cutout.• SR 26/West Avenue – Install traffic signal, realign intersection, add left-turn lanes on SR 26.
2. Alternate Route - Improve cross section to 11-ft. travel lanes and 5-ft. shoulders on Roads 353, 352, 84, and 368 to provide for an alternate to SR 26 and animproved bicycle route.
3. Sidewalks – Install new sidewalks and repair the existing sidewalks from Old Mill Road to Assawoman Canal.
4. Improve access – Improve commercial access points (delineation, channelization) between Clarksville and the Assawoman Canal.
5. Shoulders – Improve/add shoulders along SR 26 to a minimum width of 5 feet to provide adequate bicycle facilities, between Clarksville and the Assawoman Canal.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: In the summer and fall of 1998, the Department collected traffic count data on SR 26 from the Assawoman Canal to US113. Based on thetraffic information and an inventory of existing conditions in the study area, a Project Needs Report was completed in February 1999. The Needs Report identified fourcomponents that contribute to the need for improvements to SR 26.
SR 26, ASSAWOMAN BAY TO US113 (CONTINUED)
1. Congestion• Primarily concentrated in Dagsboro and Ocean View.• High summer average daily traffic and weekend traffic, in excess of 20,000 vehicles per day on summer weekends.• Failing level of service at the following SR 26 intersections:
• West Avenue• Central Avenue• Route 17• Route 20• Main Street South (Dagsboro)
• Low average speeds.2. Safety
• Higher than average accident rate between Clarksville and Old Mill Road.• High number of accidents at six intersections along SR 26.
3. Access – Many businesses along SR 26 have no (or poorly delineated) access points, particularly in Millville and Ocean View, which contributes to potentiallyhazardous situations and additional backups.
4. Roadway Conditions – Lack of adequate shoulder areas, particularly for bicyclists in Millville and Ocean View.
The findings of the Needs Report were presented in February 1999 to the SR 26 Advisory Committee, a group that includes local government leaders, business owners,developers, and local residents. The Advisory Committee concurred with the conclusions included in the Needs Report.
Alternate Route
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 38Senatorial District 20
SR 26, ASSAWOMAN BAY TO US113 (CONTINUED)
Dagsboro Intersection SR 26, Atlantic Avenue
EST COSTINDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,450 2,012 1,550 0
Alt. Route, Omar Rd.(S353), 100% ST 1,250 PE 1,250Windmill Rd.(S368) 100% ST 100 R/W 100
80% FHWA 7,560 C 7,560
SR 26, Atlantic Avenue 100% ST 1,250 PE 1,250100% ST 500 R/W 500
80% FHWA 7,750 C 7,750
Dagsboro Intersection 100% ST 100 C 100
All $ X 1,000
SUSSEX COUNTY EAST/WEST IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: The Department of Transportation has conducted anextensive review of Sussex county roadways and presented the findings in a final report to SussexCounty. We will be working with the County, along with other interested parties, to implementthe recommendations on a phased basis. Possible improvements include the following:
A. SR 24, Planning Study in FY 2002.B. SR 54 Planning Study in FY 2002.C. SR 23 Planning Study in FY 2003.D. Study of 14 intersections in FY 2003, FY 2004, FY 2005.E. Guardrail improvements throughout the County in FY 2002.F. Geometric realignment improvements on SR 20 in FY 2004.G. Culvert extensions on SR 54 in FY 2003.H. Paved shoulder installation on SR 26 from US113 to Shaft Ox Corner.
Funding is reserved for the above improvements. As these studies are completed and projectelements handed off for preliminary design and activities, these funds will be allocated to effect
the improvements identified for construction.County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District:Senatorial District:
EST COST
FMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07
PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJTODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF
0 3,000 5,000 1,000 1,000100% ST 2,000 PE 2,000100% ST 3,000 ENV 3,000100% ST 5,000 R/W 5,000
80% FHWA 10,000 C 5,000 5,000
All $ X 1,000
US 13 / US113 CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Improvements will include:• Delmar median improvements – modify median with cross over adjustments and turn lanes.• US 13 / US 13A/ S 46 Seaford – modify intersection.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To reduce traffic congestion and preserve capacity of the corridor.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ManagementRepresentative District: 35,39,40Senatorial District: 19, 21
EST COSTFMB ID INDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 0 0 0 0
Delmar Median Imp’s 100% ST 11 1180% FHWA 127 127
US 13/US113/S 46100% ST 10 10
80% FHWA 115 115
All $ X 1,000
US 13 / US113 CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DELMAR IMPROVEMENTS SEAFORD IMPROVEMENTS
SU
SS
EX
HIG
HW
AY
EY
CH
UR
CH
RD
LD RACE TRACK RDDELMAR
RD
IRON HILL RD
ST
. GE
OR
GE
SR
D
DE
LMA
RR
D
WALLER RD.
FRANCIS
ST.YORKST.
ROSELINCOLN AVE.DELAWARE AVE.JEWELL ST.
ST.GROVE
FIR
ST
ST
.
SE
CO
ND
ST
. FO
UR
TH
ST
.
FI F
THS
T.
SIX
TH
ST
.
SE
VE
NT
HS
T.
EIG
HT
HST
.
BIS
TA
TE
BLV
D.
HA
NTW
ERKE
R
ELLIS PKY.
TE
NT
HST
.
BEAUCHAMP
JONES TERR.
DR
.
WE
ST
ER
LEE
WOODSIDE
PINESIDEJEWELL ST.
GROVE
BYNUM LA.
BIS
TA
TE
BLV
D.
N.
PE
NN
SY
LVA
NI A
AV
E
SU
SS
EX
HIG
HW
AY
EY
CH
UR
CH
RD
LD RACE TRACK RDDELMAR
RD
IRON HILL RD
ST
. GE
OR
GE
SR
D
DE
LMA
RR
D
WALLER RD.
FRANCIS
ST.YORKST.
ROSELINCOLN AVE.DELAWARE AVE.JEWELL ST.
ST.GROVE
FIR
ST
ST
.
SE
CO
ND
ST
. FO
UR
TH
ST
.
FI F
THS
T.
SIX
TH
ST
.
SE
VE
NT
HS
T.
EIG
HT
HST
.
BIS
TA
TE
BLV
D.
HA
NTW
ERKE
R
ELLIS PKY.
TE
NT
HST
.
BEAUCHAMP
JONES TERR.
DR
.
WE
ST
ER
LEE
WOODSIDE
PINESIDEJEWELL ST.
GROVE
BYNUM LA.
BIS
TA
TE
BLV
D.
N.
PE
NN
SY
LVA
NI A
AV
E
ESKRIDGE RD
ES
KR
IDG
ER
DS
AN
FIL
IP
HERRING RUN RD
HEARNS POND RD
HE
AR
NS
MIL
LR
D
SWAIN RD
ELKS
RD
OLDFURNACE
RD
SU
SS
EX
HI G
HW
AY
SSSTATIO
NR
D
SP
EC
KR
D
DR
MARATHON
CT
BRADFORD S
BRYAN STDOGWOOD AVEYO
UN
G
GARDEN LA
SUSSEXAVE
DOLBY
BR
INS
FIE
LD
TH
OM
AS
ON
SH
OR
ED
R PKY
AV
E
DR
NO
RT
HS
T
MAPLE
DR
BEE
CH
LA
BURTON ST
MAINS
YLALA
H
ORT
BINDR
AT
LAN
TA
DRTLANTA CIR
ANTA CIRNTAIR
MA
DI
JEF
FEE
LLO
C C
MIDDLEFORD A
PITT
E
534
534
535
532531
533
46
531
46
543
544
546
546
544
13
544B
544A
46
ESKRIDGE RD
ES
KR
IDG
ER
DS
AN
FIL
IP
HERRING RUN RD
HEARNS POND RD
HE
AR
NS
MIL
LR
D
SWAIN RD
ELKS
RD
OLDFURNACE
RD
SU
SS
EX
HI G
HW
AY
SSSTATIO
NR
D
SP
EC
KR
D
DR
MARATHON
CT
BRADFORD S
BRYAN STDOGWOOD AVEYO
UN
G
GARDEN LA
SUSSEXAVE
DOLBY
BR
INS
FIE
LD
TH
OM
AS
ON
SH
OR
ED
R PKY
AV
E
DR
NO
RT
HS
T
MAPLE
DR
BEE
CH
LA
BURTON ST
MAINS
YLALA
H
ORT
BINDR
AT
LAN
TA
DRTLANTA CIR
ANTA CIRNTAIR
MA
DI
JEF
FEE
LLO
C C
MIDDLEFORD A
PITT
E
534
534
535
532531
533
46
531
46
543
544
546
546
544
13
544B
544A
46
CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, SUSSEX COUNTY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements will focus on the southbound side of US 13 and include:
• Bridgeville Service Road – Construction of a parallel service road from S 40 to Cannon Street
• Laurel Service Road - Construction of a parallel service road from US 9 to S568 in Laurel
• Seaford Service Road - Construction of a parallel service road at S534 to serve an area currently zoned for development.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To reduce traffic congestion and preserve capacity in the US 13 corridor.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 39,40,Senatorial District: 19, 21,
EST COSTFMB ID INDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 165 2,341 87 588
Bridgeville 100% ST 350 PE 36980% FHWA 1,150 C 1,279
Laurel 100% ST 35 PE 35100% ST 270 R/W 285
80% FHWA 403 C 437
Seaford 100% ST 130 PE 130100% ST 1,600 R/W 1,688
80% FHWA 1,495 C 1,663
All $ X 1,000
CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, SUSSEX COUNTY (CONTINUED)
BRIDGEVILLE LAUREL
SEAFORD
20
OLD
MEADOW
RD
DO
ESK
RID
HERRING RUN RD
THARP RD
HE
AR
N
STEIN HWY
CONCORD RD
SU
SS
EX
HIG
HW
A
SC
H
ATION
RD
PINEVIEW
STST
EVERGREEN
AVE
WALNUT
DR
BRYAN STDOGWOOD AVEYO
UN
G
RDEN LA
N SHOORESCT DR
SC
BEE
CH
LA
BURTON ST
MAINST
UST ST
TWOOD
AK STDR
WO
OD
LAW
N
AV
E
TR
EA
DST
RO
DN
EY
STARMST
ARBUTUS AVE
NY
LON
BLV
DN
YLO
NB
L
EX
TH
USTO
NS
TW
ES
TIV
YDR
RO
SETR
EE
LA
WILLE
Y ST
GRAY
HOLLY
AT
LAN
TAD
R
CIR
IR
R
K DR
MA
DISO
N
AGE
MA
GN
OLIA DR
ARBUTUS AVE
EAS
T
IVYDR
LAN
TAN
AC
YP
RE
SS
HU
RLE
YA
VE
TULIP
ST
ST
SH
IPLEYS
TS
TS
T ST ST
WA
LNU
TLAH
ALL
HA
LLC
YP
RE
SS
PO
RTE
RB
RA
DFO
RD
WILLIA
MC
HES
TE
POPLARST
SPRUCEST
HOLLY
RA
YM
ON
DLA
KING
VIRGINIA AVE
DELAWARE PL
NANTICOKE AVE
WASHINGTON
STATEST
ST
ST
ST
ST STSTSTSTST
MAPLE
WALNUT
CHESTNUT
OAK
CE
DA
RA
VE
HIGH
PEA
RL
CO
NW
ELLN
AR
C
THIRDSPRUCE
FOURTHFIFTH
SIXTH
PINE
ST
AR
CH
MA
RK
ETS
CH
OO
LLA
STATE
LINDEN
WA
SH
ING
TO
N
WATER
ST
FRO
NT
ST
FRO
NT
ST
EX
T
HURLEY
FRO
NT
ST
COLLINSAVE
NO
RT
HS
T
CH
ANDL
ER
NU
TTER
LA
PERKINSBARBARA ST
CLARENCEWOOLFORD
THOMPSONLINCOLN
POPLARKING
RO
SSST
NYLON AVE
DUTTON AVE
LITTLELEA
GUE
DR
PINE
CONE
DR
VICTORIAA
VE
RIVERSIDE DR
JAM
OR
EDR
SUSSEX
BEAVE
R DA
MDRRONMORE DR
RIV
ER
VIS
TAR
IVE
RSI D
E
FOURTH
DOGW
O
DRNANTICOKEDR
CIR
CEDAR LANEHEMLOCKR
D
HIC
KO
RY
PIN
EH
OLL
YO
AK
CO
UN
TR
YS
PU
RC
E
RD R
D RD
RD
RD
RD
R
PITTRD
WILKINSON
DRCHESTNUT
LA
RIV
ER
S
END
DR
HA
RB
OR
SN
UG
DR
SURREY
DRKENM
OREFAYMAURY
AVEELM ST
CHARLESPINE
3
535
21
20
13
93
539
5433
534
534
639
535
535
530
486A20A
46
13
20
OLD
MEADOW
RD
DO
ESK
RID
HERRING RUN RD
THARP RD
HE
AR
N
STEIN HWY
CONCORD RD
SU
SS
EX
HIG
HW
A
SC
H
ATION
RD
PINEVIEW
STST
EVERGREEN
AVE
WALNUT
DR
BRYAN STDOGWOOD AVEYO
UN
G
RDEN LA
N SHOORESCT DR
SC
BEE
CH
LA
BURTON ST
MAINST
UST ST
TWOOD
AK STDR
WO
OD
LAW
N
AV
E
TR
EA
DST
RO
DN
EY
STARMST
ARBUTUS AVE
NY
LON
BLV
DN
YLO
NB
L
EX
TH
USTO
NS
TW
ES
TIV
YDR
RO
SETR
EE
LA
WILLE
Y ST
GRAY
HOLLY
AT
LAN
TAD
R
CIR
IR
R
K DR
MA
DISO
N
AGE
MA
GN
OLIA DR
ARBUTUS AVE
EAS
T
IVYDR
LAN
TAN
AC
YP
RE
SS
HU
RLE
YA
VE
TULIP
ST
ST
SH
IPLEYS
TS
TS
T ST ST
WA
LNU
TLAH
ALL
HA
LLC
YP
RE
SS
PO
RTE
RB
RA
DFO
RD
WILLIA
MC
HES
TE
POPLARST
SPRUCEST
HOLLY
RA
YM
ON
DLA
KING
VIRGINIA AVE
DELAWARE PL
NANTICOKE AVE
WASHINGTON
STATEST
ST
ST
ST
ST STSTSTSTST
MAPLE
WALNUT
CHESTNUT
OAK
CE
DA
RA
VE
HIGH
PEA
RL
CO
NW
ELLN
AR
C
THIRDSPRUCE
FOURTHFIFTH
SIXTH
PINE
ST
AR
CH
MA
RK
ETS
CH
OO
LLA
STATE
LINDEN
WA
SH
ING
TO
N
WATER
ST
FRO
NT
ST
FRO
NT
ST
EX
T
HURLEY
FRO
NT
ST
COLLINSAVE
NO
RT
HS
T
CH
ANDL
ER
NU
TTER
LA
PERKINSBARBARA ST
CLARENCEWOOLFORD
THOMPSONLINCOLN
POPLARKING
RO
SSST
NYLON AVE
DUTTON AVE
LITTLELEA
GUE
DR
PINE
CONE
DR
VICTORIAA
VE
RIVERSIDE DR
JAM
OR
EDR
SUSSEX
BEAVE
R DA
MDRRONMORE DR
RIV
ER
VI S
TAR
IVE
RSI D
E
FOURTH
DOGW
O
DRNANTICOKEDR
CIR
CEDAR LANEHEMLOCKR
D
HIC
KO
RY
PI N
EH
OLL
YO
AK
CO
UN
TR
YS
PU
RC
E
RD R
D RD
RD
RD
RD
R
PITTRD
WILKINSON
DR
CHESTNUT
LA
RIV
ER
S
END
DR
HA
RB
OR
SN
UG
DR
SURREY
DRKENM
OREFAYMAURY
AVEELM ST
CHARLESPINE
3
535
21
20
13
93
539
5433
534
534
639
535
535
530
486A20A
46
13
24
CHIPMANS POND RD
RD
ODLAND FERRY RD
D
SYCAMORE
TRUSCHOOL BUS LANE
OAK LANE DR
RD
SAILORRD
CH
IPM
AN
S
CHASE
DR
R
CREEKRDMARYLAND
C
RANDALLST
GLADYSST
VANBUREN
ST
JACKSONDR
H
WO
LF
ES
T
ST ST
ST
ST
STST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
HEARN AVEHORSEY AVEALLENAVEAVE
AVEAV
EB
OY
CELAUREL ELL
IS
PR
ET
TYM
AN
PU
RN
ELL
DR
WH
ITE
LAKE
DR
WA
TE
RV
IEWAV
E
AVE
GO
VE
RNO
RS
LAN
SIN
G
KIN
GS
T
STCOOPER
FRONT
WILLO
W
ST
PIN
ES
T
LEWISDR
LACHIPMANS
BROADLAKESIDEDR
SH
OR
TA
VE
WILS
ON
SU
SSE
XA
VE
BRO
OK
LYNAVE
DELAW
AREAVE
WASHINGTONGEORGETOWN
ROAD
DANIELS
MARVIL DRLOCUSTJUNIPER
PIN
E
E. P
OP
LAR
ST
CE
NT
RA
LA
VE
OA
KMARKET
ST
TOWNSEND
ELM
MA
PLES
TB
ELL
EA
VE
SIXTH
SIXTH
GR
EENS
GIB
SO
NC
RO
CKE
TTW
EB
B
LITTLECREEK
SEVENTHCENTEREIGHTH
NINTHTENTH
W.
PO
PLA
R
CLAYTON
EIGHTHDE
SH
IEL
DSCANNON
ST
EVERGREEN DR
FO
RE
ST
LA
FOURTH STFIFTH ST
HOW
ARD
ST
SUNSET
PIN
ETR
EE
HOLLY
BIG MILLS BRIDGE
SY
CAM
OR
ELA
KURTZ
DR
PA
RK
LAAVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
ST
WALNUT
WILSONST C
ULV
ER
DR
ST
CHIPMANS
PR
UC
EST
MECHANIC
ST
ST
DE
WE
Y
ST
AVE
2ND
MEADOW
BRANCHDRIVE
MEAD
OW
BRA
LAU
PARKDR
IV FO
461
465
462
49924A
69
7013
492 24
24
78A
70
466
479
24
CHIPMANS POND RD
RD
ODLAND FERRY RD
D
SYCAMORE
TRUSCHOOL BUS LANE
OAK LANE DR
RD
SAILORRD
CH
IPM
AN
S
CHASE
DR
R
CREEKRDMARYLAND
C
RANDALLST
GLADYSST
VANBUREN
ST
JACKSONDR
H
WO
LF
ES
T
ST ST
ST
ST
STST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
HEARN AVEHORSEY AVEALLENAVEAVE
AVEAV
EB
OY
CELAUREL ELL
IS
PR
ET
TYM
AN
PU
RN
ELL
DR
WH
ITE
LAKE
DR
WA
TE
RV
IEWAV
E
AVE
GO
VE
RNO
RS
LAN
SIN
G
KIN
GS
T
STCOOPER
FRONT
WILLO
W
ST
PIN
ES
T
LEWISDR
LACHIPMANS
BROADLAKESIDEDR
SH
OR
TA
VE
WILS
ON
SU
SSE
XA
VE
BRO
OK
LYNAVE
DELAW
AREAVE
WASHINGTONGEORGETOWN
ROAD
DANIELS
MARVIL DRLOCUSTJUNIPER
PIN
E
E. P
OP
LAR
ST
CE
NT
RA
LA
VE
OA
K
MARKET
ST
TOWNSEND
ELM
MA
PLES
TB
ELL
EA
VE
SIXTH
SIXTH
GR
EENS
GIB
SO
NC
RO
CKE
TTW
EB
B
LITTLECREEK
SEVENTHCENTEREIGHTH
NINTHTENTH
W.
PO
PLA
R
CLAYTON
EIGHTHDE
SH
IEL
DSCANNON
ST
EVERGREEN DR
FO
RE
ST
LA
FOURTH STFIFTH ST
HOW
ARD
ST
SUNSET
PIN
ETR
EE
HOLLY
BIG MILLS BRIDGE
SY
CAM
OR
ELA
KURTZ
DR
PA
RK
LAAVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
ST
WALNUT
WILSONST C
ULV
ER
DR
ST
CHIPMAN
SP
RU
CEST
MECHANIC
ST
ST
DE
WE
Y
ST
AVE
2ND
MEADOW
BRANCHDRIVE
MEAD
OW
BRA
LAU
PARKDR
IV FO461
465
462
49924A
69
7013
492 24
24
78A
70
466
479
404
404A
404AS
STCHURCH
MA
INS
T
SUNNYSIDE RDSEASHORE HIGHWAY
FEDERALSBURGRD
NES
RD
FAW
N
REDDEN
NEWTON RD
D
SPRUCE
ST ST
ST STSTST
STST
STST
STST
ST
ST
BIRCH
R.R
.AV
E
CANNON
GUMALL
EY
1ST
ST
JOHN
MARKETMILL ST
UNION
DELAWARE AVE
PINE
WALNUT
MAPLE
CEDAR
CHESTNUT ALLEYEDGEWOOD
SUSSEX
SUSSEX ELLIOTT
ELLIOTTAVE
AVE
JACOB
EARLEE AVE
CANNON
DRELM
WASHINGTON AVE
EMORY
CA
NN
ON
ST
LAW
SST
WILLIA
MS
T
PAR
KA
LLEY
ME
CH
AN
ICS
TC
HE
RR
YA
LLE
Y
FRUITLAND AVE
642
17
17
561
564
404
582
563
600
565
5583
40
404
404A
404AS
STCHURCH
MA
INS
T
SUNNYSIDE RDSEASHORE HIGHWAY
FEDERALSBURGRD
NES
RD
FAW
N
REDDEN
NEWTON RD
D
SPRUCE
ST ST
ST STSTST
STST
STST
STST
ST
ST
BIRCH
R.R
.AV
E
CANNON
GUMALL
EY
1ST
ST
JOHN
MARKETMILL ST
UNION
DELAWARE AVE
PINE
WALNUT
MAPLE
CEDAR
CHESTNUT ALLEYEDGEWOOD
SUSSEX
SUSSEX ELLIOTT
ELLIOTTAVE
AVE
JACOB
EARLEE AVE
CANNON
DRELM
WASHINGTON AVE
EMORY
CA
NN
ON
ST
LAW
SST
WILLIA
MS
T
PAR
KA
LLEY
ME
CH
AN
ICS
TC
HE
RR
YA
LLE
Y
FRUITLAND AVE
642
17
17
561
564
404
582
563
600
565
5583
40
SR 1, CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, SUSSEX COUNTY
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION:
SR 1 & SR 16PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Construct a grade-separated interchange at thesignalized intersection of SR1 and SR16, along with the removal of median crossovers.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To enhance safety and improve traffic flow inaccordance with the SR1 Corridor Capacity Preservation Program.
SR 1 & SR 30PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: Extend SR 30 to SR 1 Business
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To reduce traffic congestion and preserve capacity in theSR 1 corridor, eliminate the need for signalization.
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 36Senatorial District: 18
EST COSTFMB ID INDIVIDUAL TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR PROJECT FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # SEGMENTS IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 742 800 1,733 0
96-122-01 SR 30 Extension to SR 1, 100% ST 100 R/W 100Business 80% FHWA 3,031 C 3,031
99-122-01 SR 16/SR 1 & SR 16 80% FHWA 960 PE 960Interchange 100% ST 250 ENV 250
100% ST 1,100 R/W 550 55080% FHWA 8,000 C 8,666
All $ X 1,000
SR 1, CORRIDOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS, SUSSEX COUNTY (CONTINUED)
A. SR 30 @ BUS SR 1 B. SR 1/SR 16
30
1
RD
VERDAM
RD
KIRBY
RD
D
ARGO'S CORNER RD
RD
GOLDENRODCIR
HIDDEN MEADOWS TERRACE
JOSHUA
DR
LINDSA
YLAM
ATTHEW
CIR
SHELBYWAY
E. SAR
ATOG
ARD
W. S
ARATOG
AR
D
W. Y
ORKT
OW
NRD
E. YO
RKTO
WN
RD
WATSON
D
VALLEY
FORGE
DR
BRANDYWINE RD
LEXIN
GTO
NDR
INGTON
DR
ERD
N. BRANDYWINE
RD
CONCORDDR
PRINCETONRD
SARATOGARD
206
206
7
207A
212
7
14
209
30
1
RD
VERDAM
RD
KIRBY
RD
D
ARGO'S CORNER RD
RD
GOLDENRODCIR
HIDDEN MEADOWS TERRACE
JOSHUA
DR
LINDSA
YLAM
ATTHEW
CIR
SHELBYWAY
E. SAR
ATOG
ARD
W. S
ARATOG
AR
D
W. Y
ORKT
OW
NRD
E. YO
RKTO
WN
RD
WATSON
D
VALLEY
FORGE
DR
BRANDYWINE RD
LEXIN
GTO
NDR
INGTON
DR
ERD
N. BRANDYWINE
RD
CONCORDDR
PRINCETONRD
SARATOGARD
206
206
7
207A
212
7
14
209
PAYNT
BROADKILL RD
A
LAN
KR
D
JEFFER
SO
NR
D
OLDSRD
ZION CHURCH RDRD
EVA DR
233
234C 234A235
16
234
233
16
236
PAYNT
BROADKILL RD
A
LAN
KR
D
JEFFER
SO
NR
D
OLDSRD
ZION CHURCH RDRD
EVA DR
233
234C 234A235
16
234
233
16
236
SR 1, FROM SR 24 TO NORTH OF US 9 (FIVE POINTS)
PROJECT SCOPE/DESCRIPTION: This project involves widening theshoulder on southbound SR1 from north of Five Points to north of Route 24.This section of southbound SR 1 has constrained capacity and a widenedshoulder could facilitate its multi-modal usage in accordance with AASHTO’srecently updated guidelines. This project also adds a sidewalk and “greenarea” that is consistent with the Charles B. Mills Boulevard concept. It willrequire right-of-way acquisition and utility relocation.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To eliminate traffic backups into the City ofRehoboth
County: SussexMunicipality:Program Category: System ExpansionRepresentative District: 37Senatorial District: 20
EST COSTFMB ID TO CURRENT FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005-2007
OR FUNDING COMPLETE PHASE 7/00-6/01 7/01-6/02 7/02-6/03 7/03-6/04 7/04-6/07PROJ # IN PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
TODAY’S $ TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF TOTAL TTF0 1,424 540 1,424 1,246 2,002
100% ST 270 LOC/ENV 80100% ST 700 PE 369100% ST 2,150 R/W 1,055 1,246
80% FHWA 9,000 C 10,012
All $ X 1,000
9
24
D
MUNCY BRANCH RD
WOLF N
CLAY RD
KIN
GS
HIG
HW
AY
ELLTOW
NR
D
POSTAL LA
OVERDR
OBI
NSV
ILLE
RD
RD
DR
DO
VE
KNOLL DO
VE
KNOLL
CIR
DOVE
DR
TURTLE
PIN
EWO
HOLLY
RTADO
CTT
DARTMOU
TH
DR.
MC
NICOL
CEDAR
COLGATEDR
VASSAR DR
BY
RN
MA
WR
DR
PR
INS
TO
NC
T MA
RTIN
LAP
AYN
TERLA
TRUITTAVE
CARRIAGELA
WAGON
WHEEL
GUNPOWDER
POWDER
HORN
CANDLELIGHT
SPINNINGW
HEEL
LANTERNLA
LANTERNLA
COLONIAL LA
BRIA
ND
RCO
LON
IAL
LAO
LDC
OA
CH
DR
SAB
RINA
DR
TIFF
ANY
DR
BRIA
ND
R
ELKCAMP
ELK CAMP
HIGHALPINE
FIRSTSECONDST
THIRDFOURTH
FIFTHSIXTH
BEECHDR
ELM
LA
SPRUCE
EDGEWOOD
MAPLE
OAK
PIN
E
LOC
UST
LA
LINDE
NLA
MULBERRY LA
DOGWOODDR
CE
DA
RD
R
DR
DR
DR
LA
LA
HOW
ARDD
R
NORTH
RD
E ISACCSDR
WISSACS
DR
MELS
ON
RD
TULIP DR
WIL
LOW
DR
JUNIPER
DR
BIRCH
DRPOPLARLA
LA
MA
GN
OLIA
DE
LP
AV
DELPA
NORTH
DR
NO
RTHR
AM
SOU
THR
285
270
270A
283
283
277
285B
18
275
275
276
14
1212
268
268A9
24
D
MUNCY BRANCH RD
WOLF N
CLAY RD
KIN
GS
HIG
HW
AY
ELLTOW
NR
D
POSTAL LA
OVERDR
OBI
NSV
ILLE
RD
RD
DR
DO
VE
KNOLL DO
VE
KNOLL
CIR
DOVE
DR
TURTLE
PIN
EWO
HOLLY
RTADO
CTT
DARTMOU
TH
DR.
MC
NICOL
CEDAR
COLGATEDR
VASSAR DR
BY
RN
MA
WR
DR
PR
INS
TO
NC
T MA
RTIN
LAP
AYN
TERLA
TRUITTAVE
CARRIAGELA
WAGON
WHEEL
GUNPOWDER
POWDER
HORN
CANDLELIGHT
SPINNINGW
HEEL
LANTERNLA
LANTERNLA
COLON IAL LA
BRIA
ND
RCO
LON
IAL
LAO
LDC
OA
CH
DR
SAB
RINA
DR
TIFF
ANY
DR
BRIA
ND
R
ELKCAMP
ELK CAMP
HIGHALPINE
FIRSTSECONDST
THIRDFOURTH
FIFTHSIXTH
BEECHDR
ELM
LA
SPRUCE
EDGEWOOD
MAPLE
OAK
PIN
E
LOC
UST
LA
LINDE
NLA
MULBERRY LA
DOGWOODDR
CE
DA
RD
R
DR
DR
DR
LA
LA
HOW
ARDD
R
NORTH
RD
E ISACCSDR
WISSACS
DR
MELS
ON
RD
TULIP DR
WIL
LOW
DR
JUNIPER
DR
BIRCH
DRPOPLARLA
LA
MA
GN
OLIA
DE
LP
AV
DELPA
NORTH
DR
NO
RTHR
AM
SOU
THR
285
270
270A
283
283
277
285B
18
275
275
276
14
1212
268
268A