translation of linear-reference crash data to on-street/cross- street nomenclature

15
Translation of Linear- Reference Crash Data to On- Street/Cross-Street Nomenclature

Upload: ira-lambert

Post on 13-Dec-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Translation of Linear-Reference Crash Data to On-Street/Cross-

Street Nomenclature

51,180 DHSMV in Local DBASE

7,707 DHSMV Not in Local

DBASE

395 DOT Not in Either DBASE

4,403 DOT Not in DHSMV

19,398 DOT in Local Data

2,019 DOT Not in Local DBASE but in DHSMV

21,812DOT RECORDS99 & 00 ONLY

58,887DHSMV Records

1999 – 2001

103,298 Hillsborough County and COT Crash

Records

1999 - 2001

Crash Data Universe

What is Linear-Referencing Roadway Section IDs

– Section ID Comprised of three non-unique sets of data• County ID aa• Section # bbb• Subsection # ccc

Forms Unique Roadway ID aabbbccc

– Sections tend to follow State Road Numbers, but the relationship is not absolute

Mileposts– Three-digit precision ie: 10.687 Miles

– Used with Roadway Characteristics Inventory (RCI) to record the location of:• Point Features/Events (Section – Milepost)• Linear Features (Section – Beginning Milepost – Ending Milepost)

What is Linear-Referencing

On Street / Cross Street Crash Data Uses Intersection, Intersection Influence, and

Offset Information– N. Florida Ave and Polk Street

– At the Intersection

– (or) Influenced by Intersection – 50 ft South

– (of) Not at the Intersection – 200 ft North

Geo-location Methodology – Assign Crash Event to Appropriate Intersection (#@&*## !!!)

– Filter Mid-block Crashes by Query of Intersection Influence Attribute

– Either Remove Mid-Block Crashes or Use GIS Script to “back crashes off of the intersection”

Expletive Deleted

Pros and Cons

CriteriaLinear

ReferenceOn Street /

Cross Street Note

Statewide Applicability

Compatible With Existing Local Data

Intersection Analysis

Mid-Block Analysis

Spatial AccuracyHillsborough County Has a Highly Accurate Centerline Layer

Cross Reference to Roadway Attributes

Ease of Use On Scene

Pros and Cons

Two FeaturesDrawn to Represent

Single Event

Locating Crashes in GIS using Linear Reference Mileposts

Locating Crashes in GIS using Linear Reference Mileposts

A Route is a GIS Feature that has:– Common ID Attribute (Roadway ID aa.bbb.ccc)

– XY coordinates

– Geographic Length Attribute

– M (measure) Attribute

A Route Event Theme is:– A table of Events such as Crashes, Point Attributes,

Linear Attributes

– Each Event Has• Roadway ID Attribute• Milepost Attribute (or Beginning and Ending MP info)

Associating Route Events with Underlying Point Features

ArcGIS 8.x ArcTool Box “Nearest Node” Tool– Associate a Point Feature from one Coverage with the

nearest Node in another coverage

Error Trapping– Check if all State Road Intersections are assigned Local

Centerline Intersection Ids

– Check if all Local Intersections within a buffer of State Routes are assigned a Section and Milepost #

– Manually Review all Interchanges and Areas of Complex Geometry

Pros and Cons

Difficult Many to OneRelationship

Pros and Cons

Propagated Spatial Error

Pros and Cons

Local CenterlineRemoves “Doglegs”

Associating Crash Data with Intersections

“Jump” Crash Event to Nearest DOT Intersection Feature

Store the Offset Distance

Transfer DOT Crash to Associated Local Centerline Intersection

Use Crash Offset Script to relocate crash to correct position using local centerline Geometry

Contact Info:

Demian MillerTindale Oliver & Assoc.Tampa, FL813.224.8862

[email protected]