transforming educational practice
DESCRIPTION
Developing ways to design learning in the digital age using frameworks such as: TPACK/TPCK, SCOT, SAMR, TIM,TRANSCRIPT
digitalcapability.com.au
Transforming educational practice
#DLDA – Melbourne 2013
Allison Miller
Share what you … know or find
Go to collaborative GoogleDoc: bit.ly/TransformingLearning
• Add info, links, slides etc • Review what others have contributed
Session Overview
• Why transform educational practice?• TPACK Framework• DLDA pedagogies• Other supporting frameworks• Understanding the wider TPACK context• Evaluating educator/organisation TPACK
Why transform educational
practice?
Image By Ping News – Released to Public: Massive Sandstorm from the Northwest African Desert (NASA) - http://www.flickr.com/photos/pingnews/470812817/
Creating
Evaluating
Analysing
Applying
Understanding
Remembering
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_Taxonomy
Bloom’s Taxonomy
When incorporating technology into learning,
the outcome shouldn't remain the same
Cain (2013)http://ideaplay.org/in-tpack-the-song-does-not-remain-the-same/
Image by TheDreamSky – “inconceivable Catch” - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dhilung/2664755988/
Integrating technology is more about challenging our current beliefs about pedagogy than
using the technology
Bartolowits (ND)http://edtech2.boisestate.edu/bartolowitsr/portfolio/504-synthesis-final.pdf
Technology in itself is not likely to improve ineffective
teaching practice
Yew Tee & Shing Lee (2011)http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/tee.html
Educators need to re-evaluate their own teaching practice and their existing assumptions about education, the
education system and their students in order to be able to transform educational
practice
(Yew Tee & Shing Lee, 2011)
To effectively incorporate technology into (or repurpose technology for)
education, educators need to know the affordances and constraints of
technology
(Abbitt, 2011)
TPACK (TPCK) A framework for designing learning in the digital age
TPACK Framework & its knowledge components
Source:Koehler & Mishra (2008), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators
Content Knowledge
Technological Knowledge
Pedagogical Knowledge
Pedagogical Content
Knowledge
Technological Pedagogical Knowledge
Technological Content
Knowledge
Technological Pedagogical
andContent
Knowledge
CONTEXT
Example (Context) Content Pedagogy Technology
Designing Learning in the Digital Age (DLDA) – (PD for transforming change in education and training)
• Global Education Meta-trends
• Facilitating disruptive and transformative change
• Flipped teaching• Peer/Collective
(Tribe/Gang) learning
• Gdocs, Wikis, BlackBoard Collaborate, Twitter, Eportfolio Group, Email
SA Dept of Education and Child Development – (Model for incorporating technology when delivering Australian National Curriculum)
• Australian Curriculum• ICT General Capability i
n the Australian Curriculum
• Teaching for Effective Learning Framework (TfEL)
• Interactive whiteboards, personal devices, etc
Flat Classrooms(Lindsay & Davis, 2012) – (teaching programs to incorporate global citizenship in schools)
• Framework for 21st
Century Learning • ISTE’s National
Educational Technology Standards for Students (NET-S)
• Global Citizenship
• ISTE’s National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NET-T)
• Problem/Project-based learning
• Skype, blogs, wikis, video
Learning Technology by Design – (for In-service Teacher Education Program(Koehler, 2011))
• Design of online-courses, the design of educational films, or the re-design of existing web-sites
• Peer/Collective (Tribe/Gang) learning
• Problem/Project-based learning
• Various
For more info see: http://bit.ly/TPCK-GDoc
DLDAWhat are the pedagogies required for a digital age?
Delivery models for designing learning in the digital age
Individual Learning Plans
Action/Project based learning
Problem seeking & solving learning (Design thinking)
Work-based/Situated learning
Service learning
Peer/Collective (Tribe/Gang) learning
Professional Learning Communities /PLNs (Circles)
Informal/Just-in-Time/Social/Self-organised learning
Scenario-based learning
Others?
Other supporting frameworks:
TIM
Continuums of learning and integration
Novice Beginner Competent Proficient Expert
Dreyfus (1980) model of skill acquisition
Technological Pedagogical Content
Technology Integration Matrix (TIM)
Source: Florida Center for Instructional Technologyhttp://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/download/tim_table_of_summary_indicators.pdf
Technology Integration Matrix (TIM)
Source: Florida Center for Instructional Technologyhttp://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/matrix.php
Technology Integration Matrix (TIM)
Source: Arizona K-12 Center http://www.azk12.org/tim/
Technology Integration Matrix (TIM)
Source: Florida Center for Instructional Technologyhttp://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/matrix.php
Entry Adoption Adaptation Infusion Transformation
Novice Beginner Competent Proficient Expert
Other supporting frameworks:
SAMR
Continuums of learning and integration
Novice Beginner Competent Proficient Expert
Dreyfus (1980) model of skill acquisition
Technological Pedagogical Content
SAMR
Source: http://jennyluca.wikispaces.com/TPACK+and+SAMR Also see: Ruben Puentedura's (creator of SAMR) blog
SAMR
Image by Tim Klapdor– “SAMR + Hype Cycle - HiRes” - http://www.flickr.com/photos/timklapdor/8448164657/
SAMR – Ruben R Puentedura
Source: http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/
SAMR – more information
The SAMR Model – an introduction to the SAMR Model by Mark Glynn – YouTube Video
Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYXNGcjbNlc
Digital Discoveries – Intro to SAMRBy Tim Holt – YouTube Video
Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jn1nHgFesUs
SAMR – more information
The SAMR Model – Tool Set, Skill Set or Mind Set? by Pete Brown – Slides in DropboxSource: https://www.dropbox.com/s/20z5czq81p5buif/SAMR%20Tool%20Set%20Skill%20Set%20or%20Mind%20Set.pdf
SAMR – more information
The SAMR Ladder – Tool Set, Skill Set or Mind Set? by Pete Brown – PreziSource: http://prezi.com/vacgqbnjnmgl/the-samr-ladder/?auth_key=6c7fef9a9c09d9cb3adda2c9be7f585f1f586e2d
SAMR – curated
Websites and blogs about SAMR
diigo.com/user/theother66/SAMR
Understanding the wider TPACK context
SCOT THEORY
Social Construction of Technology orSCOT Theory
Image by Vanguard Visions – “iPads” - http://www.flickr.com/photos/77018488@N03/8396833459/
Social Construction of Technology orSCOT Theory
Image by Vanguard Visions – Traffic Lights - http://www.flickr.com/photos/77018488@N03/
Image from Wood, 2011, pg 19 - http://aut.researchgateway.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10292/4298/WoodYI.pdf?sequence=3
Professional Standards for Educators for the Digital Age
Images from ISTE - http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-students - http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers
TPACK evaluation tools to gain an insight/starting point
TPACK evaluation tools
Self-reporting survey methods
Performance based measures
Both measures are highly complementary
TPACK Confidence Survey (TCS) (Albion, 2010)
Source: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/7351/3/Albion_Jamieson-Proctor_Finger_SITE_2010_AV.pdf
Professional Capabilities of TPACK Vocational Self-Efficacy (Albion, 2010)
Source: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/7351/3/Albion_Jamieson-Proctor_Finger_SITE_2010_AV.pdf
Survey of Pre-service Teachers' Knowledge of Teaching and Technology (Schmidt, 2009)
Source: http://mkoehler.educ.msu.edu/unprotected_readings/TPACK_Survey/Schmidt_et_al_Survey_v1.pdf
Technology Integration Assessment Rubric(Harris, 2010)
Source: http://activitytypes.wmwikis.net/file/view/TechIntegrationAssessmentRubric.pdf
Source: http://activitytypes.wmwikis.net/file/view/TPACKObservationInstrument.pdf/317400318/TPACKObservationInstrument.pdf
Technology Integration Observation Instrument(Harris, 2011)
Stages of development(Finger, 2010 )
Source: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/8740/1/Finger_Jamieson-Proctor_Albion_AV.pdf
Collective Challenge
Based on SECI Framework:
• Socialisation• Externalisation• Combination• Internalisation