transforming defence · 2020. 1. 16. · page 2 uk defence –the challenge of modernisation...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Page 1
Transforming DefenceHugh Durrant-Whyte FRS
Chief Scientific Advisor, Ministry of Defence
-
Page 2
UK Defence – The Challenge of Modernisation
▪ Evolving threats: From state-based threats to individual terrorist acts, the challenges to our peace and prosperity are increasingly complex, ambiguous, destabilising and potentially catastrophic.
▪ Rapid technology change: Technology, especially digital technology, is developing at a breath-taking pace making pervasive many capabilities once only imagined in science fiction.
Modernisation of culture and skills as well as tools and technologies
Two Modernising Imperatives
-
Page 3
Four Pillars of Defence Modernisation
1. Foundations
2. Technology
3. Skills
4. Operations
Modernisation pillars shape and transform,
rather than replace, current war-fighting capabilities
-
Page 4
Modernisation 1: Foundations
▪ Build a renewed (digital) foundation on which the broad spectrum of future threats can be understood, deterred and defeated.
▪ Adopt and deploy a common architectures for all components, systems and command structures:
– Top level – a coherent cross-government command and control (C2) facility enabling integration of intelligence and situational awareness, and delivery of full spectrum effect as a contribution to the Fusion Doctrine.
– Operational level – Multi-domain C2 bringing together pan-defenceintelligence, effects and command structures in both permanent and deployed headquarters.
– Tactical level – Adopt modern open architecture principles across the equipment programme to enhance interoperability and ensure agility to technical change.
-
Page 5
Sidebar – Open Architectures
▪ Past year - Defence has actively committed to open architectures, primarily to get after agile ever-green software development, access to best in class algorithms, and through-life cost savings.
▪ Open architecture is now an untradeable KUR on all Cat A acquisitions – Type 31a, MIV, Radar 2, NSIT (D), and others:
– “Open” is through functional test (cf. Morpheus). It is not a set of standards. Openness is both technical and commercial.
– “Open” implies specification of modules with corresponding “APIs”, potentially contracted for separately.
– A growing MoD community of practice in open systems specification, contracting and commercial development
Building a significant and important culture change in Defence
-
Page 6
Modernisation 2: Technology
▪ Modern Deterrence: How information, mass and effect can be projected to influence, deter and de-escalate aggression and harm.
▪ Increased investment in (see also S&T):
– Information Advantage: improved resilient and secure communications, increased sensing and situational awareness, intelligent processing and understanding of information, and defensive and offensive cyber capabilities.
– Modernised mass and effect: including complex weapons, advanced protection and defensive aids, robotics and autonomous systems.
– Enhance existing capabilities: Focus on modern digital and intelligent systems applied to build advantage, in areas including ISR, ASW, A2AD and force readiness.
-
Page 7
Sidebar - Project NELSON – Data and AI at Sea
-
Page 8
Modernisation 3: Skills
▪ Defence culture will need to embrace digital and information skills
▪ Modernisation will put a premium on training in information skills:
– Command skills in areas such as information manoeuvre
– Synthetic environments to build and exercise skills from decision making (wargames) to simulated training.
▪ Culturally shifts:
– Embrace connectedness and sharing of information not just across systems and commands, but also across government.
– Recognise that technology, especially automation and AI, will drive reductions in the number of people and platforms required to deliver defence outcomes – and prepare for this.
-
Page 9
Sidebar - Data-Driven Combat Training
BATUK
ASKARI STORM
01-08 NOV 19
BG LEVEL
EXERCISE OVERVIEW
Filters
Day
NightDeliberate Attack
Tactical actionTime Met ConditionsVisibility (over 3000m)Relative Humidity (over 80%)Temperature (over 40C)
ü
ü
ü
ü
Blue Force Red ForceHit Ratio
Force Ratio
3:1 6:1
Baseline Exercise
Casualties
Fratricide
Rounds resulting in hits by ammo type
Ammo type
Direct
Indirect
Date
Time
02 Nov 05 NOV 07 NOV
1500 0200 0600 0300 1500
1
5
61
1
5 27
Baseline Exercise
Total
Nu
mb
er
of F
ratr
icid
e
Nu
mb
er
of F
ratr
icid
e
02 NOV 03 NOV 05 NOV 07 NOVDate
Direct
Indirect
1300 1500 0500 0700 0200Time 03001 2 1 1 1
10 7
Baseline Exercise
Total
Observer Mentor Review
Collateral
Damage
15 10
Baseline Exercise
Total 30 35
Baseline Exercise
Total
Direct
Indirect
50403020100 10090807060
62%
32%
DirectIndirect
Typ
e o
f w
ea
po
n e
ffe
ct
% successful hits
Exercise
average
Average range of hits
DirectIndirect
Direct
Indirect
50403020100 10090807060
43%
47%
DirectIndirect
Typ
e o
f w
ea
po
n e
ffe
ct
% successful hits
Exercise
average
Average range of hits
35 55
Baseline Exercise
75 42
10 16
Blue casualties
(% of force)
% treated in
Golden Hour
% blue vehicles
damaged
Furth
er d
etai
l in
inte
ract
ive
view
60mm HE,
Ground Burst
MG
Further detail in
interactive view
0
25
50
75
100
50403020100 10090807060
Baseline
Exercise
Freq
uenc
y of
pre
viou
s ex
erci
ses
% casualties on exercises
Frequency of casualties across all exercises
OM Prompts
1
· Field craft skills
- Marksmanship
· TTPs:
- SoM
- Weapon placement
- Understanding of
enemy capability in
planning
- Ability to match weapon
systems to targets
· Field craft skills
- Use of cover & concealment
· TTPs:
- Use of fire & manoeuvre
· Risk appetite
- Planners
- Those executing the plan
· Accuracy of J2 assessment by
planners
· Field craft skills
- Low level skills and drills
· Understanding of the plan
· Effectiveness of control measures
· Command and control comments
· Field craft skills
- Low level skills and drills
· Effectiveness of control measures
· Command and control comments
12 1
1
-
Page 10
Modernisation 4: Operations
▪ Modernisation aspects of both external and internal operations.
▪ External - our adversaries no longer adhere to a rules-based order and where technology has become a ubiquitous disruptor:
– Cross-command and cross-government coherence,
– Permissions and legality of modern, often digital, effects,
– Increased agility, flexibility and responsiveness to address the spectrum of modern threats.
▪ Internally - embrace rampant and pervasive technology:
– More innovative, flexible and agile approach to equipment procurement and sustainment
– Adoption of modern automation technologies in the way we deliver efficient outcomes across the business of Defence.
-
Page 11
Sidebar – Wargaming the Threat
▪ Recent Strategic Wargames:
– Modern Deterrence, Escalation Wargame
▪ Key Insights:
– Information and understanding
– Force readiness and resilience
– Grey-zone conflict and permissions
▪ Tactical wargames:
– Eagle, Agile, Information, Unmanned Warrior – and others
– Playing in technology cards
▪ Experimentation
– Joint venture, strike brigade
-
Page 12
Transforming Defence:
The Role of S&T
-
Page 13
S&T Strategy: In the Mainstream
OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE
Rest of
Government
Intelligence
Agencies
Industry
Primes
.Allies &
Partners
Adversaries
Academia &
Non-Profit
Small & Medium
Enterprises
Systems Enablers
Operational NeedsFuture Concepts
Affordability
Technology OptionsRequirements
IntegrationRelease To Service
Sustainment
S&T
Innovate
Defence and Security
Capabilities
-
Page 14
S&T Big Bets –Building Blocks for Transformation
Information
Effects
Skills
1. Autonomous Systems – robotics, machine learning, AI
2. Cyber Deterrence – defensive and offensive systems, tactical EWS
3. ISR and Data Fusion – distributed resilient sensing, data fusion
4. Next Generation Command & Control (C2) – open architectures, PED
5. Affordable space – resilient communications and intelligence
6. Novel Weapons – modular systems, low-cost mass, directed energy
7. Protection – defensive aids, missile defence, armour
8. Synthetic War Environments – war gaming, decision support
9. People – human augmentation, skills and training
Higher TRL, More Experimentation
-
Page 15
Spearheads – Modernising Capability
▪ Bring together technology to change capability:
– Spiral outcomes in the short, medium and longer terms
– Higher levels of “in field” experimentation
– High levels of external industry engagement
▪ Drive necessary changes in culture:
– Acquisition and operationalisation of open technology
– Wargame operational concepts
– Integrate in to training and doctrine
-
Page 16
Spearheads: Capability and Affordability
▪ Anti submarine warfare (ASW)
▪ Land: CEMA C2 and autonomy
▪ ISR: Data fusion and decision
▪ A2AD: complex and novel weapons
▪ Future Logistics
Longer term: > 10 years
Exploit high-TRL solutions to realise short-term
savings
Bring forward affordable alternatives to current
capability
Develop new affordable ways of delivering future
capability
Near Term: 1-3 years
Medium Term: 3- 10 years
-
Page 17
Innovation – Technology and Process
AutonomousSystems
CyberDeterrence
ISRandDataFusion
NextGenC2
AffordableSpace
NovelWeapons
Protection
SyntheticWar
HumanSkills
S&TBigBetsInform
ation
Effect
People
AntiSubmarineWarfare(ASW)
LandCEMA,C2andAutonomy
FutureLogistics
ISRDataFusionandDecisions
ComplexWeaponsandEffects
SpearheadProjects
Near-termExternalDisruptive
AI,MachineLearningPeopleandSkills
Synthetics
FutureWorkforce
NuclearDeterrence
DefenceAgility
Information&Decisions
NovelEffects
StrategicAdvantage
PowerProjection
DefenceChallenges
DASA InvestmentFundSMEsFLInnovationUnits
DE&S ISS
FLCs FMC
DIU
S&T
TechnologyInsertion FastProcurement
-
Page 18
Innovation – Defence and Security Accelerator
-
Page 19
Key Messages
▪ This is a challenging time: Threats and technology
▪ Future Capabilities:
– Focussed on information, effects and ”modern deterrence”
– Deliver key cultural and skills shifts
– Address affordability
▪ S&T – transforming defence
– Big Bets – information, effects and skills
– Spearheads – addressing holistic capability change
– Innovation – new ways of doing business