transforming defence · 2020. 1. 16. · page 2 uk defence –the challenge of modernisation...

19
Page 1 Transforming Defence Hugh Durrant-Whyte FRS Chief Scientific Advisor, Ministry of Defence

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Page 1

    Transforming DefenceHugh Durrant-Whyte FRS

    Chief Scientific Advisor, Ministry of Defence

  • Page 2

    UK Defence – The Challenge of Modernisation

    ▪ Evolving threats: From state-based threats to individual terrorist acts, the challenges to our peace and prosperity are increasingly complex, ambiguous, destabilising and potentially catastrophic.

    ▪ Rapid technology change: Technology, especially digital technology, is developing at a breath-taking pace making pervasive many capabilities once only imagined in science fiction.

    Modernisation of culture and skills as well as tools and technologies

    Two Modernising Imperatives

  • Page 3

    Four Pillars of Defence Modernisation

    1. Foundations

    2. Technology

    3. Skills

    4. Operations

    Modernisation pillars shape and transform,

    rather than replace, current war-fighting capabilities

  • Page 4

    Modernisation 1: Foundations

    ▪ Build a renewed (digital) foundation on which the broad spectrum of future threats can be understood, deterred and defeated.

    ▪ Adopt and deploy a common architectures for all components, systems and command structures:

    – Top level – a coherent cross-government command and control (C2) facility enabling integration of intelligence and situational awareness, and delivery of full spectrum effect as a contribution to the Fusion Doctrine.

    – Operational level – Multi-domain C2 bringing together pan-defenceintelligence, effects and command structures in both permanent and deployed headquarters.

    – Tactical level – Adopt modern open architecture principles across the equipment programme to enhance interoperability and ensure agility to technical change.

  • Page 5

    Sidebar – Open Architectures

    ▪ Past year - Defence has actively committed to open architectures, primarily to get after agile ever-green software development, access to best in class algorithms, and through-life cost savings.

    ▪ Open architecture is now an untradeable KUR on all Cat A acquisitions – Type 31a, MIV, Radar 2, NSIT (D), and others:

    – “Open” is through functional test (cf. Morpheus). It is not a set of standards. Openness is both technical and commercial.

    – “Open” implies specification of modules with corresponding “APIs”, potentially contracted for separately.

    – A growing MoD community of practice in open systems specification, contracting and commercial development

    Building a significant and important culture change in Defence

  • Page 6

    Modernisation 2: Technology

    ▪ Modern Deterrence: How information, mass and effect can be projected to influence, deter and de-escalate aggression and harm.

    ▪ Increased investment in (see also S&T):

    – Information Advantage: improved resilient and secure communications, increased sensing and situational awareness, intelligent processing and understanding of information, and defensive and offensive cyber capabilities.

    – Modernised mass and effect: including complex weapons, advanced protection and defensive aids, robotics and autonomous systems.

    – Enhance existing capabilities: Focus on modern digital and intelligent systems applied to build advantage, in areas including ISR, ASW, A2AD and force readiness.

  • Page 7

    Sidebar - Project NELSON – Data and AI at Sea

  • Page 8

    Modernisation 3: Skills

    ▪ Defence culture will need to embrace digital and information skills

    ▪ Modernisation will put a premium on training in information skills:

    – Command skills in areas such as information manoeuvre

    – Synthetic environments to build and exercise skills from decision making (wargames) to simulated training.

    ▪ Culturally shifts:

    – Embrace connectedness and sharing of information not just across systems and commands, but also across government.

    – Recognise that technology, especially automation and AI, will drive reductions in the number of people and platforms required to deliver defence outcomes – and prepare for this.

  • Page 9

    Sidebar - Data-Driven Combat Training

    BATUK

    ASKARI STORM

    01-08 NOV 19

    BG LEVEL

    EXERCISE OVERVIEW

    Filters

    Day

    NightDeliberate Attack

    Tactical actionTime Met ConditionsVisibility (over 3000m)Relative Humidity (over 80%)Temperature (over 40C)

    ü

    ü

    ü

    ü

    Blue Force Red ForceHit Ratio

    Force Ratio

    3:1 6:1

    Baseline Exercise

    Casualties

    Fratricide

    Rounds resulting in hits by ammo type

    Ammo type

    Direct

    Indirect

    Date

    Time

    02 Nov 05 NOV 07 NOV

    1500 0200 0600 0300 1500

    1

    5

    61

    1

    5 27

    Baseline Exercise

    Total

    Nu

    mb

    er

    of F

    ratr

    icid

    e

    Nu

    mb

    er

    of F

    ratr

    icid

    e

    02 NOV 03 NOV 05 NOV 07 NOVDate

    Direct

    Indirect

    1300 1500 0500 0700 0200Time 03001 2 1 1 1

    10 7

    Baseline Exercise

    Total

    Observer Mentor Review

    Collateral

    Damage

    15 10

    Baseline Exercise

    Total 30 35

    Baseline Exercise

    Total

    Direct

    Indirect

    50403020100 10090807060

    62%

    32%

    DirectIndirect

    Typ

    e o

    f w

    ea

    po

    n e

    ffe

    ct

    % successful hits

    Exercise

    average

    Average range of hits

    DirectIndirect

    Direct

    Indirect

    50403020100 10090807060

    43%

    47%

    DirectIndirect

    Typ

    e o

    f w

    ea

    po

    n e

    ffe

    ct

    % successful hits

    Exercise

    average

    Average range of hits

    35 55

    Baseline Exercise

    75 42

    10 16

    Blue casualties

    (% of force)

    % treated in

    Golden Hour

    % blue vehicles

    damaged

    Furth

    er d

    etai

    l in

    inte

    ract

    ive

    view

    60mm HE,

    Ground Burst

    MG

    Further detail in

    interactive view

    0

    25

    50

    75

    100

    50403020100 10090807060

    Baseline

    Exercise

    Freq

    uenc

    y of

    pre

    viou

    s ex

    erci

    ses

    % casualties on exercises

    Frequency of casualties across all exercises

    OM Prompts

    1

    · Field craft skills

    - Marksmanship

    · TTPs:

    - SoM

    - Weapon placement

    - Understanding of

    enemy capability in

    planning

    - Ability to match weapon

    systems to targets

    · Field craft skills

    - Use of cover & concealment

    · TTPs:

    - Use of fire & manoeuvre

    · Risk appetite

    - Planners

    - Those executing the plan

    · Accuracy of J2 assessment by

    planners

    · Field craft skills

    - Low level skills and drills

    · Understanding of the plan

    · Effectiveness of control measures

    · Command and control comments

    · Field craft skills

    - Low level skills and drills

    · Effectiveness of control measures

    · Command and control comments

    12 1

    1

  • Page 10

    Modernisation 4: Operations

    ▪ Modernisation aspects of both external and internal operations.

    ▪ External - our adversaries no longer adhere to a rules-based order and where technology has become a ubiquitous disruptor:

    – Cross-command and cross-government coherence,

    – Permissions and legality of modern, often digital, effects,

    – Increased agility, flexibility and responsiveness to address the spectrum of modern threats.

    ▪ Internally - embrace rampant and pervasive technology:

    – More innovative, flexible and agile approach to equipment procurement and sustainment

    – Adoption of modern automation technologies in the way we deliver efficient outcomes across the business of Defence.

  • Page 11

    Sidebar – Wargaming the Threat

    ▪ Recent Strategic Wargames:

    – Modern Deterrence, Escalation Wargame

    ▪ Key Insights:

    – Information and understanding

    – Force readiness and resilience

    – Grey-zone conflict and permissions

    ▪ Tactical wargames:

    – Eagle, Agile, Information, Unmanned Warrior – and others

    – Playing in technology cards

    ▪ Experimentation

    – Joint venture, strike brigade

  • Page 12

    Transforming Defence:

    The Role of S&T

  • Page 13

    S&T Strategy: In the Mainstream

    OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

    Rest of

    Government

    Intelligence

    Agencies

    Industry

    Primes

    .Allies &

    Partners

    Adversaries

    Academia &

    Non-Profit

    Small & Medium

    Enterprises

    Systems Enablers

    Operational NeedsFuture Concepts

    Affordability

    Technology OptionsRequirements

    IntegrationRelease To Service

    Sustainment

    S&T

    Innovate

    Defence and Security

    Capabilities

  • Page 14

    S&T Big Bets –Building Blocks for Transformation

    Information

    Effects

    Skills

    1. Autonomous Systems – robotics, machine learning, AI

    2. Cyber Deterrence – defensive and offensive systems, tactical EWS

    3. ISR and Data Fusion – distributed resilient sensing, data fusion

    4. Next Generation Command & Control (C2) – open architectures, PED

    5. Affordable space – resilient communications and intelligence

    6. Novel Weapons – modular systems, low-cost mass, directed energy

    7. Protection – defensive aids, missile defence, armour

    8. Synthetic War Environments – war gaming, decision support

    9. People – human augmentation, skills and training

    Higher TRL, More Experimentation

  • Page 15

    Spearheads – Modernising Capability

    ▪ Bring together technology to change capability:

    – Spiral outcomes in the short, medium and longer terms

    – Higher levels of “in field” experimentation

    – High levels of external industry engagement

    ▪ Drive necessary changes in culture:

    – Acquisition and operationalisation of open technology

    – Wargame operational concepts

    – Integrate in to training and doctrine

  • Page 16

    Spearheads: Capability and Affordability

    ▪ Anti submarine warfare (ASW)

    ▪ Land: CEMA C2 and autonomy

    ▪ ISR: Data fusion and decision

    ▪ A2AD: complex and novel weapons

    ▪ Future Logistics

    Longer term: > 10 years

    Exploit high-TRL solutions to realise short-term

    savings

    Bring forward affordable alternatives to current

    capability

    Develop new affordable ways of delivering future

    capability

    Near Term: 1-3 years

    Medium Term: 3- 10 years

  • Page 17

    Innovation – Technology and Process

    AutonomousSystems

    CyberDeterrence

    ISRandDataFusion

    NextGenC2

    AffordableSpace

    NovelWeapons

    Protection

    SyntheticWar

    HumanSkills

    S&TBigBetsInform

    ation

    Effect

    People

    AntiSubmarineWarfare(ASW)

    LandCEMA,C2andAutonomy

    FutureLogistics

    ISRDataFusionandDecisions

    ComplexWeaponsandEffects

    SpearheadProjects

    Near-termExternalDisruptive

    AI,MachineLearningPeopleandSkills

    Synthetics

    FutureWorkforce

    NuclearDeterrence

    DefenceAgility

    Information&Decisions

    NovelEffects

    StrategicAdvantage

    PowerProjection

    DefenceChallenges

    DASA InvestmentFundSMEsFLInnovationUnits

    DE&S ISS

    FLCs FMC

    DIU

    S&T

    TechnologyInsertion FastProcurement

  • Page 18

    Innovation – Defence and Security Accelerator

  • Page 19

    Key Messages

    ▪ This is a challenging time: Threats and technology

    ▪ Future Capabilities:

    – Focussed on information, effects and ”modern deterrence”

    – Deliver key cultural and skills shifts

    – Address affordability

    ▪ S&T – transforming defence

    – Big Bets – information, effects and skills

    – Spearheads – addressing holistic capability change

    – Innovation – new ways of doing business