transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

27
1 Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland v1 Transformer and Channel ad hoc March 2008 Fred Schindler Cisco Systems 1 ad hocs with an average attendance of 37 people since the last report. Bill Delveaux Cisco Systems Chad Jones Cisco Systems Christian Beia Phihong Clay Standford Linear Daniel Feldman Microsemi David Law 3COM Dean Huumal Wurth Electronics MiJcom Ekrem Cengelci Microsemi Frank Yang Commscope Fred Schindler Cisco Systems Geoff Thompson Nortel Networks George Zimmerman Solar Flare Hugh Barrass Cisco Systems Jacob Herbold Jacob Herbold Joe Berry Bel John Hess Bel John Jetzt Avaya Joseph Dupuis Hubbell Joseph Maggiollino Broadcom Keith Hopwood Phihong Kirk Hayden Akros Silicon Martin Patoka Texas Instruments Masaki Yasukawa NEC Magnus Matthew Landry Silicon Labs Peter Johnson SIFOS Randy Rano Tyco Raul Lozano Juniper Rick Frosch Phihong Robert Dixon National Semiconductor Terry Cobb Systimax Thong Huynh Maxim Thuyen Dinh Pulse Valerie Maguire TIA; Siemon Wael Diab Broadcom Yair Darshan Microsemi Yakov Beloposky Bel Stewart Zach Clifton UNH-IOL Transformer data provided by: Bel, Pulse, Tyco, other

Upload: others

Post on 10-Jan-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

1Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland v1

Transformer and Channel ad hoc

March 2008

Fred SchindlerCisco Systems

1 ad hocs with an average attendance of 37 people since the last report.

Bill Delveaux Cisco SystemsChad Jones Cisco SystemsChristian Beia PhihongClay Standford LinearDaniel Feldman MicrosemiDavid Law 3COMDean Huumal Wurth Electronics MiJcomEkrem Cengelci MicrosemiFrank Yang CommscopeFred Schindler Cisco SystemsGeoff Thompson Nortel NetworksGeorge Zimmerman Solar FlareHugh Barrass Cisco SystemsJacob Herbold Jacob HerboldJoe Berry BelJohn Hess BelJohn Jetzt AvayaJoseph Dupuis HubbellJoseph Maggiollino Broadcom

Keith Hopwood PhihongKirk Hayden Akros SiliconMartin Patoka Texas InstrumentsMasaki Yasukawa NEC MagnusMatthew Landry Silicon LabsPeter Johnson SIFOSRandy Rano TycoRaul Lozano JuniperRick Frosch PhihongRobert Dixon National SemiconductorTerry Cobb SystimaxThong Huynh MaximThuyen Dinh PulseValerie Maguire TIA; SiemonWael Diab BroadcomYair Darshan MicrosemiYakov Beloposky Bel StewartZach Clifton UNH-IOL

Transformer data provided by: Bel, Pulse, Tyco, other

Page 2: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

2Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Agenda

• Approach taken• Creating the IEEE 802.3 channel model• Review task force recommendations• Current unbalance• Next step.

This is a work in progress: Trends are useful, model specifics are in development.

Page 3: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

3Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Approach Taken

• Agree on a system model for current unbalance calculations.

• Use IEEE 802.3 requirements and legacy system data to refine the model used.

• Use the refined approach to model IEEE 802.3at current unbalance.

Page 4: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

4Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Reference to IEEE channel

Clause 33 only discusses midspan PSEs with reference to a channel.

It can be inferred that an end point PSE needs to connect to a channel.

This system has 6 connections when a PSE is connected to a PD.

end point PSE PD

Page 5: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

5Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

The Channel Models: Detailed IEEE 802.3

maxmin//max

1 RRR

cableII ∑∑∑=

minmin//max

2 RRR

cableII ∑∑∑=

The worst-case current unbalance is modeled by combining the ISO channel resistance unbalance with an MDI connections and transformer resistance.

a // b => Replace with the resistance of “a” in parallel with “b”.

Rcon Rcon

Rt Rt

RtRt

Rcon RconTX

PDCHANNELPSE

-

VpdIport

+Vpse

MDI

Rcab

Rcab

4Rcon

4Rcon

ISO 11801 Channel

Rcon Rcon

Rt Rt

RtRt

Rcon RconRX Rcab

Rcab

4Rcon

4Rcon

I1

I2

MDI

+

- )(//

max1

min1

minmax RRcableUNBAL RRII ∑∑ −∑∑×=

Page 6: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

6Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

IEEE 802.3

)(//max1

min1

minmax RRcableUNBAL RRII ∑∑ −∑∑×=

mAmAIUNBAL 5.10%3350 =×=

This is not Ipeak. Iunb

Valid for ISO channel with 4 connectors.

A 12.95 W PD may demand 14.8 W for 50 ms.Isurge = 350 x 400/350 = 400 mA

Page 7: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

7Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Task Force recommendations 1 of 2

• Assume a constant Power PD.• Consider the PD surge power.• Calculate cable current based on system parameters.• Use ISO/IEC 11801, 3% resistive unbalance and Rch

recommendations Class-C 40 ohms, Class-D 25 ohms) *• When cable reach is < 14 m assume 5 connectors

When cable reach is >= 14 m assume 6 connectors *• Assume CAT-5e connectors or better are used on PSEs and PDs.• When a CAT-3 connector is mated with a higher grade plug use

CAT-3 resistance values. Rmate 0.3 ohms, Runbal = 0.05 ohm *• Assume the cable reach is 1 m to 100 m.

* Use for worst-case Class C calculations (maximum channel resistance with the lowest PSE supply voltage.Rmate = 0.3 ohms was used. With a short channel length a lower value of Rmate is worse.

Page 8: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

8Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Task Force recommendations 2 of 2

• Assume transformers in the PSE and PD. *

• Use 0.5 ohms maximum for transformer resistance (CT-to-signal) with a 5% resistive unbalance (legacy). *

• Assume that PSE and PD transformer resistance is uncorrelated.

• Determine how to deal with 100 MBPS 8 mA unbalance requirements and PoE unbalance currents.

* Use for worst-case Class C calculations (maximum channel resistance with the lowest PSE supply voltage.

Page 9: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

9Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

3.5%

3.6%

3.7%

3.8%

3.9%

4.0%

4.1%

4.2%

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Rmax

Cha

nnel

Cur

rent

Unb

alan

ce

QWERTModelAverage

Transformer Data

Outlier

The y-axis shows current unbalance for a 12.95 W PD demanding a power surge of 14.8 Win a worst-case Class C with a 14 m channel. Average does not include the model.

There is no specification for Rmax or transformer unbalance.The model creates a channel unbalance comparable to most of these data.

Better

Updated data moves this closer to the average.

Page 10: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

10Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Cable Current Unbalance

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

0 20 40 60 80 100

Length (m)

Cur

rent

(mA

)

ModelIEEE 802.3

IEEE 802.3 Current Unbalance

14 m

Power surge to 14.8 W, worst-case Class C.

10.5

PD power surge causes excess

Connector resistance unbalance dominates (6 connectors)

IEEERequirement

Interoperability

System Failure

Page 11: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

11Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

IEEE 802.3 Current Unbalance

Cable Current Unbalance

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 20 40 60 80 100

Length (m)

Cur

rent

(mA

)

ModelIEEE 802.3

14 m

10.5

PD power surge causes excess

Connector resistance unbalance dominates (6 connectors)

Power surge to 14.8 W, worst-case Class C.

Page 12: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

12Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

IEEE 802.3 Current Unbalance

Cable Current Unbalance

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 5 10

Length (m)

Cur

rent

(mA

)

ModelIEEE 802.35 Connector

1 m

10.5

Power surge to 14.8 W, worst-case Class C.

Connector resistance unbalance dominates (6 connectors)

Connector resistance unbalance dominates (5 connectors)

18.8

Page 13: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

13Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Short Channel Topology

One connection has been removed.Is a 5 connector system realistic for1 m < Length < 14 m ?

Do we want more reach cable or more patch cord?

Would using the4 connector channelmodel be sufficient for lengths < 14 m?

Page 14: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

14Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Review

• IEEE 802.3 used average PD power (12.95 W) and ISO channel characteristics (4 connectors) to determine Iunb (10.5 mA).

• The model for this presentation results in an unbalance current (18.8 mA) that exceeds IEEE 802.3 requirements for all channel lengths.

PD surge power 14.8 W

Transformers and 1 to 2 additional connectors

Page 15: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

15Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Unbalance Current Affect on the Transformer

Rtmax

Rtmin

Transformer

AVE

AVE

BIAS

BIASAVE III −=1

BIASAVE III +=2

BIASBIASAVEBIASAVE IIIIIII 2)()(12 =−−+=−

BIASII I=−

212

AVEBIASAVEBIASAVEcable IIIIIIII 2)()(21 =−+−=+=

Page 16: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

16Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

ANSI X3.263-1995 (TP-PMD)

• Transformers used for 100 MBPS Ethernet are required to provide 350 uH inductance with a bias current of 0 to 8 mA.

• See David Law’s Ad Hoc report for more details.

Rtmax

Rtmin

Transformer

Icable

I1

I2

IAVE

IAVE

IBIAS

I1 = -8 mA

I2 = 8 mA

mAIBIASII 82

)8(82

12 === −−−

mAIIIcable 0)8(812 =−+=+=

Page 17: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

17Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

IEEE 802.3 Unbalance Currents @ 100 MBPS

• With 5 connectors and a cable length of 1 m with a PD power surge to 14.8 W, Iunbal = 18.8 mA.

• In order to support 100 MBPS operation and additional 8 mA of bias current is required.

• PoE transform bias current = 18.8/2 + 8 = 17.4 mAThis is equivalent to an unbalance current of17.4 x 2 = 35 mA

Page 18: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

18Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

0

2

46

8

10

1214

16

18

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Rmax

Tran

sfor

mer

bia

s cu

rren

tQWERTModelAverage

PoE Transformer bias current limits

Average does not include the model.

IEEE 10.5/2 = 5.3 mA

The average transformer exceed the IEEE 802.3 requirements and does not meet theworst-case model requirements.

Worse

Updated data moves this closer to the average.

Page 19: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

19Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Cable Current Unbalance

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 20 40 60 80 100

Length (m)

Cur

rent

(mA

)

ModelIEEE 802.3

Model Adjustment

VendorAverage

PoE interoperates => Evaluate broader market

Interoperability

System Failure

IEEE 802.3 clause 33 devices interoperate. Therefore, adjustments to the worst-case model are appropriate.

Page 20: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

20Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Model Adjustment

• IEEE 802.3 clause 33 was published in June 2003Therefore, significant system volume is interoperating now.

• The most prevalent PDs are IP-phones.Most phones draw 6 to 11 W.

• AP are the second most prevalent PD.Most APs draw between 10 and 13 W.

• Data obtained in the Vport ad hoc shows that most PDs do not demand power above the classification power.

• A PD that demands 13 W on a 1 m cable with 5 connectors has an unbalance current of 16.4 mA. At 100 MBPS this results in an unbalance current of 32.4 mA.

Page 21: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

21Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Model Adjustment

Cable Current Unbalance

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 20 40 60 80 100

Length (m)

Cur

rent

(mA

)

ModelIEEE 802.3

VendorAverage

13 W PD @ 100 MBPS1 m, 32.4 mA13 W PD @ 100 MBPS10 m, 28.5 mA

Because PDs reliably interoperate, the channel model need to be adjusted further.

Worst-case model

Page 22: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

22Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Model Adjustment

• It is improbable that 5 to 6 connectors:- all have minimum resistance on the same contact point AND- all have the maximum resistance on the same contact point

• Many of these connectors are uncorrelated.They are made at different times possibly by different vendors.

RJ-45 Contact Resistance

Rmate Conductor ALT-B

1 2 3 4 Max 5 Min 6 7 Rmate 8 Rmate

RJ-45 Contact Resistance

Rmate Conductor ALT-B

1 2 3 4 Max 5 Min 6 7 Rmate 8 Rmate

RJ-45 Contact Resistance

Rmate Conductor ALT-B

1 2 3 4 Max 5 Min 6 7 Rmate 8 Rmate

RJ-45 Contact Resistance

Rmate Conductor ALT-B

1 2 3 4 Max 5 Min 6 7 Rmate 8 Rmate

RJ-45 Contact Resistance

Rmate Conductor ALT-B

1 2 3 4 Max 5 Min 6 7 Rmate 8 Rmate

RJ-45 Contact Resistance

Rmate Conductor ALT-B

1 2 3 4 Max 5 Min 6 7 Rmate 8 Rmate

I1

I2Each of these represents one connector in the channel.

Page 23: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

23Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Connector Statistics

• The graph shows a normal distribution with:Rmate_mean = 50 m-ohms, standard deviation (STDEV) = 50/6 m-ohms

• 68% of the populations is within 1 standard deviation of the mean.1 in 3 is outside this region.

• 99.7% of the population is within 3 standard deviations of the mean.1 in 370 is outside this region

• 99.9…% of the population is within 6 standard deviations of the mean.1 in 570 M is outside this region

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

-50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0Rmate (ohms)

f(Rm

ate)

f( Rmate )"Rmate - STDEV""Rmate + STDEV"Cumlative

• The ISO model includes 4 connectors in the channel and has a 3% unbalance.

• Assume the ISO RmateSTDEV = σ1

• 6 connectors in series havea mean = 6xRmate_meana

Unbalance system = 2.449 x 50= 120 m-ohm

• Add 120/6 = 20 m-ohms per connector outside the ISO channel model

216 6σσ =

Page 24: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

24Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Model Adjustment

• PSE and PD transformer resistance are uncorrelated.

• Two transformer unbalance is:

1.414x5% = 7%

212 2σσ =

Page 25: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

25Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Adjusted model

Cable Current Unbalance

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 20 40 60 80 100

Length (m)

Cur

rent

(mA

)

ModelIEEE 802.3

VendorAverage

Interoperability

System Failure

Adjustments:- Use sum-of-squares for connectors and transformer.

Current unbalance for a 13 W PD with no power surge.

Page 26: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

26Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Model Adjustment

• Assume the IEEE channel is comparable to the structured cabling channel (4 connectors) whenL < 14 m: Yes

• Assume PHYs baseline wander correction deals with the 8 mAbias requirement for 100 MBPS.Contact PHY vendors for information.

• What else?

Page 27: Transformer ad hoc 3 v1 - ieee802.org

27Transformer ad hoc IEEE 802.3at Task Force, January 2008, Portland

Next Step

• Contact PHY vendors to better understand baseline wander correction.

• Refine the model used.

• Determine IEEE 802.3 and transformer current unbalance requirements.

• Select parameters for PoE plus.

• Determine IEEE 802.3at and transformer unbalance requirements.