tranportation cases
DESCRIPTION
Transportation CasesTRANSCRIPT
(1) Macondary Co. v Commissioner of Customs, 62 SCRA 427
(2) Phil. American Gen. Insurance v Sweet Lines, 212 SCRA 194
(3) Chua Yek Hong v IAC,166 SCRA 183
(4) Smith Bell v CA, 197 SCRA 201
(5) Home Insurance Company v American Steamships Agencies, 23 SCRA 24
(6) Litonjua Shipping v National Seamen Board, 176 SCRA 189
(7) Planters Products v CA, 226 SCRA 476
(8) Yangco v Lasera, 73 Phil 330
(9) Vda. De Lat v Public Service Commission, 158 ACRS 180
(10) San Pablo v Pantranco South Express, 153 SCRA 199
(11) Qualitrans v Royal Class, 179 SCRA 569
(12) Cogeo-Cubao v CA, 201 SCRA 343
(13) Ang v Compania Maritima, 133 SCRA 600
(14) Filipino Merchants Insurance v Alejandro, 145 SCRA 42
(15) Puromines vs. CA,et.al., G.R. No. 91228, March 22, 1993
(16) Cathay Pacific v. Reyes, G.R.No.185891, June 26,2013
(17) Mindanao Terminal and Brokerage Service, Inc. vs. Phoenix Assurance; G.R. No. 162467; 5.08.09
(18) Benjamin Cua v. Wallem Philippines Shipping, Inc.; G.R. No. 171337; July 11, 2012
(19) MITSUI O.S.K. LINES LTD vs. COURT OF APPEALS; G.R. No. 119571; March 11, 1998
(20) Philippine Charter Insurance Corporation v. Neptune Orient Lines/Overseas Agency Services, Inc.; G.R. No. 145044; June 12, 2008
(21) China Airlines vs. Chiok; 407 SCRA 432
(22) KLM vs. CA 65 SCRA 237
(23) Lhuillier vs. British Airways 615 SCRA 380
(24) Lufthansa vs. CA 238 SCRA 290
(25) Luna vs. CA 216 SCRA 107
(26) Mapa vs. CA 275 SCRA 286
(27) Sabena vs. CA 253 SCRA 38
(28) Santos, III vs. North West 210 SCRA 256