training module for practitioners: sub-module 1: fundamentals of

25
Training Module for Practitioners: Sub-module 1: Fundamentals of Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation Topic 1.3: DRR and CCA

Upload: hacong

Post on 01-Jan-2017

228 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Training Module for Practitioners: Sub-module 1: Fundamentals of Disaster Risk Reduction

and Climate Change Adaptation Topic 1.3: DRR and CCA

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

Colophon

CATALYST Online Training Module for Practitioners

These teaching materials are part of the CATALYST Training Module on Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation

Title Sub module 1: The Fundamentals of Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation Topic 1.3: Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change Adaptation

Authors in alphabetical order Fons Jaspers

Learning objective To develop an understanding of the link between DRM, DRR and CCA and their respective additional value in mainstreaming CCA and the role the ‘practitioner’ at intermediate level can play to close the gap between modelers, policy and communities on CCA.

With funding from The European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 283177 (CATALYST).

Materials adapted from Where specified, slides have been adapted from IPCC (2012), Hellmuth et al. 2011, Mitchel and van Aalst (2008) , TorqAid & FDC (2011) . Basic material is from ADPC, 2013. Integrating Disaster Risk Management into Climate Change Adaptation.

When using these materials, include the following citation:

Jaspers, A.M.J., (2013) Introduction to Climate Change Adaptation CATALYST Online Training Module for Practitioners. Version 2.0. http:// www.catalyst-project.eu/

Topic 1.3 DRR and CCA

Objectives topic 1.3 DRR and CCA:

• understanding the link between Disaster Risk Management (DRM), Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR), Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and their respective additional value;

• understanding of the role the ‘practitioner’ at intermediate level can play to close the gap between modellers, policy and communities on CCA;

Linkages:

• This topic 1.3 DRR for CCA builds on the topic 1.1 on Disaster Risk Reduction and topic 1.2 on Climate Change Adaptation

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The practitioners at from DRM, DRR and CCA together constitute an enormeous potential fro mainstreamin DRR and CCA and therefore focus target group of this Online module

Managing risks of extreme events

Sub-module 1; Topic 3: DRR and CCA Source: IPCC SREX (2012))

• When a climate event strikes a community, the likelihood of a disaster depends on its exposure and vulnerability.

• Development includes a potential for adaptation, for risk management and for mitigation of climate change.

• Climate change influences variability in weather and extreme climate events

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Where DRM focusses on the adverse impacts of hazards, DRR and CCA focus more on the causal effect of disasters (see topic 1.2 and 1.2 of this Online module). CCA also may grasp the opportunities climate change offers. Mitigation of climate change however important, is not the focus of this report.

Risk Management Cycle

Figure: Schematic representation of the risk management cycle (from J.Mysiak, FEEM)

The management of risk can be seen as a boundless loop involving several overlapping and closely integrated phases: Prevention, Protection and Review are more continuous activities with focus on DRR/ CCA study, pilots, policy and investments. Preparedness, Response and Recovery are closer related to disaster events with focus on the disaster management part of DRM

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Full description of the Risk Management cycle can be found in Topic 1.1, Mysiak J., Calliari E., Introduction to Disaster Risk Reduction CATALYST Online Training Module for Practitioners. Version 2.0. http://  

Integration CC information in DRR cycle

• Results of climate studies (grey cycle) support policy decisions (white cycle) which are specific for the steps in the outer blue DRR cycle.

• Specialized information

from science, policy and the field require interaction, communication, regulations and finances at all levels.

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA (source figure: Hellmuth et al. 2011)

A review is considered in each cycle.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
In spite of the dependence between DRR and climate change there is a lack of coordination between DRR and CCA. as DRR, developed from DRM and created in the era of disaster response, where engineers and emergency response organizations govern DRR while climate change adaptation is often lead by environmental ministries. In order to accomplish integration at the political level financial resources as well as new communication channels support integration. Practitioners are in a good position to communicate with institutions.

Climate risk and adaptation in DRR

Topic 1: Sub-Topic 2: Climate Change Adaptation

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Slide 7: The climate risk management according Mitchell and van Aalst (2008) is the Climate relevant part of Disaster risk manage-ment which deals with all hazards. CCA is a long-term adaptation to changes, including an appreciation of the potential benefits climate change might bring.

The practitioner works....

Sub-module 1; Topic 3: DRR and CCA

• For communities, (sub) national agencies and ....NGO’s • On development, DRR, CCA and managing remainding risks • Together with DRR and CCA focal points of departments,

communities at-risk , civil society organisations, research, private business and media.

• By using appropriate current and future risk information as well as local information

• To affect changes in: • knowledge, behaviour and technical capacity, • political commitment, policies, programs and budget, • institutional arrangements, management tools and

systems

Adapted from : ADPC. 2013.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Slide 8: Practitioners operating at intermediate level using research results, linking with relevant governmental bodies and with the communities. These ‘boundary people’ often fill the gasps of lower governmental agency. If they are included in defining research objectives, interpreting data and evaluating results, there is a bigger chance that the research results will actually be used (communication at APWS workshop 2013) and (Earl, S., Carden, F., & Smutylo, T. , 2001).

Practitioners’ potential for mainstreaming CCA

Source: IPCC (2012). Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Slide 9: Practitioners operating at intermediate level maintain direct contact with the government agencies and the local communities. They can fine-tune policy messages to local level, formulate local needs to higher echelons, and indicate local level capacities. They can accommodate specialised training, organise data collection and implement planning of short term measures and prepare vision for the long term adaptation.

Opportunities for CCA practitioners

• At strategic level between community and (inter)national organisations with an holistic view on development.

• Relevant experience and skills towards climate risks, measures and spatial planning, community organisation and understanding of policies and strategies.

• Communities are already used to disaster preparedness and may already experience climate change

Adapated from: ADPC. 2013

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Slide 10: Climate change and climate change adaptation always have their impact at the community level. The practitioners generally have access to communities, governmental and university information and are used to deal with district offices where implementation of projects takes place. Question: do you recognize this situation?

• Priorities of the community are mainly short term and development oriented.

• Understanding of climate change-related information needs local translation and training.

• Information needed to feed Climate Change modelling requires specific training and funding.

• CCA and DRR still seem operating parallel but separate institutions and their budgets at district level are not necessarily in line with community priorities

Barriers for CCA practitioner Adapted from : ADPC. 2013

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Slide 11: Barriers can be different for each region and type of hazard(s). Budget on disaster risk reduction or compensation of disaster losses, that becomes available at district levels are administratively codified and not in line with communities more integrated activities

Practitioners’influence on CCA policymaking

• Policy goals, objectives and measures are evidence-based and risk-sensitive

• New climate change policy promotes CCA as an integral part of DRR and vice versa

• In the implementation of strategies and frameworks in to action, the CCA and DRR policy objectives can be recognized

• Evaluation and feedback maintain their policy relevance in spite a constantly changing risk situation

How can the practitioner operate effectively in CCA? Derived from: ADPC. 2013.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Slide 12: The practitioners contributein part to policy making and in part to the policy measures which are essential activities of practitioners in DRM, DRR and CCA.

Practitioners contrubution to CC adaptation strategy 1

• Sector vulnerability studies include impacts of extreme events:

• Disaster risk issues are addressed in adaptation objectives :

How the practitioner can contribute? Derived from ADPC. 2013.

• interpret future climate projections in terms of possible consequences, help stakeholders to identify and prioritize risks in present and future using participatory risk assessment

• assist by considering objectives with short- and long-term actions and guide deliberations to set acceptable levels of risks

Presenter
Presentation Notes
For online or classroom discussion

Practitioners’ contribution to CC adaptation strategy 2

• Disaster risk is appropriately considered throughout adaptation strategy development :

• Continuous changing risk situation is ensured in evaluation and feedback :

How the practitioner can contribute? Derived from: ADPC. 2013.

• participate in workshops or meetings and help to identify and develop: impacts, adaptation needs and priorities, suitable measures, sufficient resources and track risk components in overall achievements.

• Participation in consultation workshops for review of needs, priorities and resources and check on DRR criteria track mechanism.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
For online or classroom discussion

Continuing Project spiral

Figure: Project Management Cycle proposed by TorqAid & FDC (2011)

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Slide 15: In fact CCA project cycles are building on previous experi-ences as climate change adaptation exist through pilots and of learning by doing.

Practitioners’ contribution to the adaptation project cycle 1

How can practitioners achieve the following project outcomes?

• Projects addressing local vulnerabilities and risk management are among the adaptation goals :

• Uncertainties due to climate change and extreme climate events are considered in appraisal and formulation of projects :

• help obtain disaster risk information and the interpretation of risk relevant considerations

• help develop site-specific hazard and vulnerability considerations for impact study and adaptation needs

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

Adapted from : ADPC. 2013

Presenter
Presentation Notes
For online or classroom discussion

Practitioners’ contribution to the adaptation project cycle 2

How can practitioners achieve the following project outcomes?

• A project focal team or focal point to identify, assess and monitor the implementation is installed so that relevant disaster risk information enters into regular base-line scans :

• In an evaluation the adaptation option demonstrates the relevance and importance of managing climate-related disaster risk :

Adapted from: ADPC. 2013

• guide processes towards a community-based organisation on a continual basis

• participate in evaluation processes and focus attention on effectiveness of measures on risk and the actual application of DRR measures

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
For online or classroom discussion

Exercise: climate proofing

• Climate proofing means taking actions to protect systems or investments against climate impacts (Parry, 2007).

• The objective of this exercise is to understand the role practitioners play in climate proofing by linking science-based and community-based information against a historical perspective.

• The assignment : make a plan of activities for assessing future risk and relevant adaptation measurs for a community you know?

• An example of such an exercise in rural communities in Rajasthan, India is given in the following slides.

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Parry et al. (2007) define climate proofing as an understanding of current and future climate risks in order to develop new measures or adjustments to programs and projects so that these risks are minimized, in other words taking actions to protect investments against climate impacts. Possible for infrastructure, agricultural systems, projects

Example: climate proofing 1

• A field survey was set-up in the Udaipur district, Rajasthan, India, to assess the possible influence climate change could have on the sustainable development of local communities.

• Practitioners from a local NGO Sevamandir obtained access to local climate data over the last 33 years and were provided with downscaled climate projections for the area until 2070.

• For a selected number of villages two visits were programmed for an intensive exchange of information and to generate ideas towards a climate adaptation plan specific for the local situation.

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
ICCO a Dutch NGO (www.icco.nl) in their endeavour to better under-stand the use of climate models in relation to the development of local communities, initiated a survey on the assessment of the climate resilience of selected communities in Udaipur district, Rajasthan, India (Jaspers, 2011). Seva Mandir -partner with ICCO-(www.sevamandir.org) is guiding sustainable development in more than 500 rural and urban commu-nities in Udaipur and operating in various networks at international, national and district level.

Example: Climate proofing 2

• During 1st team visit effects, trends and impacts of climate change on all aspects of community life were discussed. Drought hazard was identified as main thread: temperature rise, more annual variation and irregularity in the rainfall were the main effects of climate change.

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

• Based on that the community members prepared an excursion for the 2nd visit at ‘hotspots’ in their area and formulated feasible adaptation measures.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Slide 20:Climate proofing: In recent years, the adaptation to climate change literature has introduced the concept of climate-related deci-sions (and climate proofing), which are choices by individuals or or-ganizations, the outcomes of which can be expected to be affected by climate change and its interactions with ecological, economic, and social systems (IPCC, 2012). For instance, choosing to build in a low-lying area whose future flooding risk increases due to climate change repre-sents a climate-related decision

Example: Climate proofing 3

• The team meanwhile consulted district agencies and available data checking local experiences with climate data to reduce uncertainties.

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

• During the 2nd visit the consequences of future climates were visualized and compared with actual practices.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The discussion in specialized groups appeared to be very helpful on order to get in-depth information and create a basis for decision making. Groups may be social groups or related to dominant activities. In Udaipur useful groups were for example: agriculture, soil and water conservation and the home-yard (women)

Example: Climate proofing 4

• Possible scenarios were discussed in groups to formulate desirable adaptive measures for integration in their annual programs:

1. store available water in retention basins and groundwater; 2. use more local crop varieties and a wider selection seeds; 3. use more organic manure to improve water retention; 4. cattle in stables to protect environment and 5. introduce new crops for the market. • Main barrier was that the core labor force leaves the area

temporarily to earn additional income, leaving children and elderly people behind.

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Positive lessons of the field survey were: 1/organise more than one visit; even a third one to fully integrate in the programme: frequent meet is important. 2/ cooperation in fact finding at all levels, 3/ selection of well-organized of communities representative over the area and 4/ the essential role of the practitioners as intermediate between scientific and local information and community processes proves to be essential.

Discussion Questions

• Why it is important to integrate climate change adaptation with disaster risk management ?

• Why is the practitioner –operating at intermediate level- essential as focus point for CCA?

• Which issues the practitioner needs to pay attention to for effective integration of CCA at both the community and the sub-national level ?

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

References • ADPC, 2013. Integrating Disaster Risk Management into Climate Change Adaptation. Disaster Risk Management Practitioner’s Handbook

Series. Bangkok.

• Earl, S., Carden, F., & Smutylo, T. (2001). Outcome mapping: Building learning and reflection into development programs. Ottawa, ON, Canada: International Development Research Centre. Retrieved from http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/32122/1/117218.pdf.

• FAO 2004. Drought impact mitigation and prevention in the Limpopo River Basin. Rome. Retrieve from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/y5744e/y5744e00.htm#)

• Hellmuth M.E., Mason S.J., Vaughan C., van Aalst M.K. and Choularton R. (eds) 2011. A Better Climate for Disaster Risk Management. International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI), Columbia University, New York, USA. [Online]. Retrieved from: http://portal.iri.columbia.edu/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_5643_7757_0_0_18/CSP3_Final.pdf

• International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2012. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Cambridge University Press.

• Jaspers, A., Maat H., Shah, R,. 2012. Capacity building Climate proofing Udaipur, Alterra, Wageningen

• Mitchel, T and van Aalst. 2008. Convergence of Climate Change reduction and Climate Change Adaptation. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), 2007. Hyogo UNISDR. 2007. Framework for Action 2005-2015. Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters. Geneva.

• TorqAid & FDC. 2011. TorqAid Diagrammatic Framework for Disaster Risk Management. [Online] Retrieved from: http://www.preventionweb.net/files/21008_21008torqaiddiagrammaticframeworkfo.pdf

• UNISDR. 2011. Global Assessment report on Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA

Sub-module 1, topic 3: DRR and CCA