traffic operations study · 2020. 12. 23. · traffic operations study i-29 nb and sb rp 101.328...

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STUDY I-29 NB and SB

RP 101.328 – RP 110.933 IM-8-029(203)101 PCN 23102 NB IM-8-029(204)101 PCN 23103 SB

Prepared By: NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PROGRAMMING DIVISION TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SECTION

December 2020

This document was originally issued and sealed by DONOVAN M SLAG Registration Number

PE 5647 on 12/22/2020 and the original document is

stored at the North Dakota Department of Transportation

Traffic Operations Study PCN 23102, 23103

1 23 USC § 409 Documents NDDOT Reserves All Objections

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction ........................................................................................ 3 Background ....................................................................................... 3 Traffic Data ........................................................................................ 4 Crash History ..................................................................................... 4 Capacity Analysis of Interstate Segment ........................................... 4 Pedestrians at Exit 104 ...................................................................... 5 Existing Conditions Exit 104 .............................................................. 6 Existing Conditions Exit 111 .............................................................. 7 Summary ........................................................................................... 8 Appendix A – Traffic Volumes ........................................................... 9 Appendix B – Crash Summary Reports ............................................. 13 Appendix C – Capacity Analysis Reports .......................................... 24


2

23 USC § 409 Documents

NDDOT Reserves All Objections

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STUDY I-29 NB and SB

RP 101.328 – RP 110.933 IM-8-029(203)101 PCN 23102 NB IM-8-029(204)101 PCN 23103 SB

INTRODUCTION The traffic control recommendations in this study are based on:

• The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), FHWA

• A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, AASHTO, 2018

• The Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, TRB, 2016

• Highway Safety Manual, 1st Edition, AASHTO, 2010

• NDDOT Traffic Operations Manual, September 2020 BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to evaluate both directions of I-29 from RP 101.328 (north of Alton) to RP 110.933 (ND 200) to determine if any revisions are needed to improve traffic operations and safety. The study area includes two interchanges: Exit 104 (Hillsboro), Exit 111 (Mayville-Portland). The cover shows the study area. The project is a structural overlay tentatively scheduled for 2025 construction. This study also evaluates pedestrian/vehicle safety and operations at Exit 104 near Hillsboro. The City of Hillsboro is requesting pedestrian facilities crossing I-29. This would provide a pedestrian connection between the city on the east side of I-29 and new housing developments on the west side. Study Intersections Traffic Control 1. I-29 Exit 104 West Ramp / Trail Co 11 Two-way Stop 2. I-29 Exit 104 East Ramp / Caledonia Ave Two-way Stop 3. I-29 Exit 111 West Ramp / ND 200 Two-way Stop 4. I-29 Exit 111 East Ramp / ND 200 Two-way Stop Highway Functional Classification Performance Classification Speed Limit I-29 Interstate Rural Rural Interstate 75 mph Caledonia Ave Major Collector N/A 25 mph ND 200 Principal Arterial Rural Rural State Corridor 45 mph There is partial interchange lighting present at Exit 104 (lighting present on I-29 mainline at the exit and entrance ramps). There is lighting present at the ramp intersections. Continuous lighting is present on Caledonia Ave east of the interchange.

Figure 1 – View northbound I-29 at RP 104.0


3



TRAFFIC DATA Traffic data was acquired from the Roadway Data Section based on counts from 2018/2019. These counts were factored to estimate 2020 and 2040 volumes. Traffic volume details are in appendix A.

Figure 2 – Traffic Data CRASH HISTORY Crash data for the study area was collected from October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2020. Half of the crashes occurred during non-dry conditions (ice/snow/wet). Contributing factors were: too fast for conditions, speed, and weather. Most of the crashes occurred during the months of December through April. See appendix B for details on the crash data. CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF INTERSTATE SEGMENT Traffic volumes were used to perform highway capacity analysis for the segment. Segment capacity worksheets are in appendix C. Year Passenger Trucks Total AADT LOS 2020 NB 4605 1395 (23.3%) 6000 A 2020 SB 4590 1400 (23.4%) 5990 A

2040 NB 5940 1800 (23.3%) 7740 A 2040 SB 5925 1810 (23.4%) 7735 A The capacity analysis was done on the 9.61 mile segment assuming level terrain. The peak hour is assumed to be 10% of the total AADT. The existing roadway cross section meets LOS guidelines.


4



PEDESTRIANS AT EXIT 104 The city of Hillsboro is requesting a pedestrian crossing over I-29 to connect to new developments on the west side of the interstate. Currently there is no pedestrian route to cross I-29. Three options are available to make this connection:

• Using existing width: by providing positive pedestrian protection on the existing structure, this option would have a 6-ft width for pedestrians, meeting ADA requirements (see figure 4 for conceptual layout).

• Widening the bridge: this option would provide a 10-ft width to meet standards for a shared-use path and would also include positive protection for both pedestrians and bicyclists.

• Construct a separate pedestrian bridge (shown in blue in figure 3) Positive pedestrian protection refers to some type of barrier separating vehicles from pedestrians (such as jersey barriers). The city of Hillsboro would need to consider how to make pedestrian and/or bicycle path connections with the developments on each side of the interstate. New pedestrian crossings at the ramp intersections are recommended to have continental style pavement markings. Pedestrian (or trail crossing) signs are recommended where traffic is turning onto the interstate.

Figure 3 – Pedestrian Concepts (shown on north side) According to the NDDOT Bridge Division, the existing structure was built in 1970 and there are at least 25 years left in the life expectancy. There are no plans on replacing the overpass and the existing structure could be widened to accommodate a 10-ft path on the north side. Providing a pedestrian facility on the existing bridge may be done by shifting the driving lanes to the south and using jersey barriers and enclosed fence to provide protection to the pedestrian facility. A concept of this is shown in figure 4.

Figure 4 – Pedestrians on existing bridge concept (enclosed fencing not shown) All three options would satisfy the pedestrian needs. A separate bridge would allow more distance between vehicle and pedestrian traffic.


5



EXISTING CONDITIONS EXIT 104

West Ramp Capacity analysis – EXISTING CONDITIONS PM Peak Hour 2020 2020 2040 2040 Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Eastbound: A* 0 A* 0 Westbound: A* 5 A* 5 Southbound: B 11 B 12 Intersection A* 6 A* 7 *Equivalent LOS shown, mainline approaches and the overall intersection LOS are not calculated for TWSC intersections.

East Ramp Capacity analysis – EXISTING CONDITIONS PM Peak Hour 2020 2020 2040 2040 Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Eastbound: A* 1 A* 1 Westbound: A* 0 A* 0 Northbound: A 10 B 10 Intersection A* 3 A* 3 *Equivalent LOS shown, mainline approaches and the overall intersection LOS are not calculated for TWSC intersections.

Major Road Turn Lane Existing? Criteria Met? West Ramp WB Left No No West Ramp EB Right No No East Ramp EB Left No No East Ramp WB Right Yes No If the pedestrian facility is chosen to be located on the north side of the bridge, it is recommended the free-flow WB right be removed at the East Ramp. This would reduce the number of conflict points for both pedestrians and vehicles. Complete Interchange Lighting Warrant 2A Continuous freeway/interstate lighting No 2B Ramp AADT 10,000 urban, 8,000 suburban, or 5,000 rural No – total is 3,590 (rural) 2C Crossroad AADT 10,000 urban, 8,000 suburban, 5,000 rural No – crossroad is 2,150 2D Lighting development in vicinity or lighted crossroad No 2E Engineering judgment No 2F Existing complete interchange lighting present No 2G Local government pays 50% and maintains No No warrants for complete interchange lighting are met at this time.


6



EXISTING CONDITIONS EXIT 111

West Ramp Capacity analysis – EXISTING CONDITIONS PM Peak Hour 2020 2020 2040 2040 Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Eastbound: A* 0 A* 0 Westbound: A* 2 A* 2 Southbound: A 9 A 9 Intersection A* 3 A* 3 *Equivalent LOS shown, mainline approaches and the overall intersection LOS are not calculated for TWSC intersections.

East Ramp Capacity analysis – EXISTING CONDITIONS PM Peak Hour 2020 2020 2040 2040 Approach LOS Delay (sec) LOS Delay (sec) Eastbound: A* 6 A* 6 Westbound: A* 0 A* 0 Northbound: B 10 B 11 Intersection A* 7 A* 7 *Equivalent LOS shown, mainline approaches and the overall intersection LOS are not calculated for TWSC intersections.

Major Road Turn Lane Existing? Criteria Met? West Ramp WB Left No No West Ramp EB Right No No East Ramp EB Left No No East Ramp WB Right No No No changes to the existing intersection geometry or traffic control devices are recommended. Complete Interchange Lighting Warrant 2A Continuous freeway/interstate lighting No 2B Ramp AADT 10,000 urban, 8,000 suburban, or 5,000 rural No – total is 2,390 (rural) 2C Crossroad AADT 10,000 urban, 8,000 suburban, 5,000 rural No – crossroad is 1,276 2D Lighting development in vicinity or lighted crossroad No 2E Engineering judgment No 2F Existing complete interchange lighting present No 2G Local government pays 50% and maintains No No warrants for complete interchange lighting are met at this time.


7



SUMMARY Based on the capacity analysis, LOS guidance is met with the current peak hour traffic. No changes to intersection traffic control devices are recommended with this study. Exit 104 If the decision is made to provide pedestrian access to cross I-29 at Hillsboro, consider one of the following options: using existing bridge width, widen the bridge, or construct a separate pedestrian bridge. Whether or not the pedestrian path is on the existing bridge or a separate facility doesn’t not have any impact on the overall traffic operations of the area. However, a separate bridge would allow more distance between vehicle and pedestrian traffic. If the pedestrian facility is chosen to be located on the north side of the bridge, it is recommended the free-flow WB right be removed at the East Ramp. At both ramp intersections, it is recommended to provide continental crosswalk markings. Pedestrian (or trail crossing) signs are recommended where traffic is turning onto the interstate.


8



ESTIMATE OF CURRENT AND FUTURE TRAFFIC NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (PLANNING DIV. TRAFFIC INFO. SECTION)

RECNO: 12225

DATE PRINTED OR REPRINTED: 11/25/2020 PROJECT NO:

DATE PREPARED: 11/25/2020 COUNTY: TRAILL ROUTE ID: 0

HIGHWAY NO: 29 HWY SUFFIX: HWY DIRECTION: N

REF PT: 100.391 OFFSET: .0000 LENGTH: 10.4042

PASSENGER EXPANSION FACTOR: 1.29 TRUCK EXPANSION FACTOR: 1.29

TRAFFIC'S ANNUAL % OF GROWTH: 1.3 ESAL'S ANNUAL % OF GROWTH: 1.3

LOCATION: NB-RP 100.391 TO RP 110.795

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALL AADT'S & ESALS, ARE AT THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE PROJECT SEGMENT *

30TH E.S.A.L.'S YEAR PASS TRUCKS TOTAL MAX HR FLEX RIGID

CURRENT 2020 4,605 1,395 6,000 600 1,230 2,040 FORECAST 2040 5,940 1,800 7,740 775 1,585 2,630

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

PAVEMENT EQUIVALENCY FACTORS: FLEXIBLE AT SN4 RIGID AT 9 INCHES

WAS CLASS WIM DATA AVAILABLE FOR THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION? N

IS THIS A REVISED ESTIMATE? N SUPERCEDES EST. OF

REQUESTED BY: DONOVAN SLAG-PROGRAMMING

* * * * * * * * REMARKS! * * * * * * * *

TRAFFIC FORECAST ESTIMATE IS BASED ON 2019 TRAFFIC COUNTS. TRAFFIC FOR THE NB DIRECTION ONLY! COMPLETED BY NR.


9



ESTIMATE OF CURRENT AND FUTURE TRAFFIC NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (PLANNING DIV. TRAFFIC INFO. SECTION)

RECNO: 12226

DATE PRINTED OR REPRINTED: 11/25/2020 PROJECT NO:

DATE PREPARED: 11/25/2020 COUNTY: TRAILL ROUTE ID: 0

HIGHWAY NO: 29 HWY SUFFIX: HWY DIRECTION: S

REF PT: 100.391 OFFSET: .0000 LENGTH: 10.4042

PASSENGER EXPANSION FACTOR: 1.29 TRUCK EXPANSION FACTOR: 1.29

TRAFFIC'S ANNUAL % OF GROWTH: 1.3 ESAL'S ANNUAL % OF GROWTH: 1.3

LOCATION: SB-RP 100.391 TO RP 110.795

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALL AADT'S & ESALS, ARE AT THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE PROJECT SEGMENT *

30TH E.S.A.L.'S YEAR PASS TRUCKS TOTAL MAX HR FLEX RIGID

CURRENT 2020 4,590 1,400 5,990 600 1,305 2,130 FORECAST 2040 5,925 1,810 7,735 775 1,685 2,755

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

PAVEMENT EQUIVALENCY FACTORS: FLEXIBLE AT SN4 RIGID AT 9 INCHES

WAS CLASS WIM DATA AVAILABLE FOR THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION? N

IS THIS A REVISED ESTIMATE? N SUPERCEDES EST. OF

REQUESTED BY: DONOVAN SLAG-PROGRAMMING

* * * * * * * * REMARKS! * * * * * * * *

TRAFFIC FORECAST ESTIMATE IS BASED ON 2019 TRAFFIC COUNTS. TRAFFIC FOR THE SB DIRECTION ONLY! COMPLETED BY NR.


10



Inte

rsec

tion

Traf

fic V

olum

es

Nor

th D

akot

a D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

SFN

792

1 (R

ev. 4

-85)

1668

/ 19

9

6067 / 1418

6078 / 1413

1668

/ 19

9 51

3 / 9

2

846

/ 88

143

/ 24

156

/ 27

513

/ 92

5221 / 1330

703 / 64

167 / 27

6097 / 1454

6108 / 1449 5159 / 1315

720 / 97

174 / 37

919

/ 98

752

/ 71

Inte

rsec

tion

No.

1

Des

crip

tion

Hills

boro

Int.

Int

. I-2

9 &

Cal

edon

ia A

ve (C

MC

491

8)

R

ef. P

t. 10

4.15

5

Hou

rs

24

Dat

e

10/1

4/20

20

1060

/ 12

9 1090

/ 16

5

876

/ 124

94

9 / 1

34

775

/ 97

K

Ram

ps

Cr

ossr

oads

Mai

nlin

e

Exist

ing

Futu

re

Ex

istin

g Fu

ture

Exist

ing

Futu

re

876

1130

1026

13

22

51

59

6656

949

1224

3336

43

04

52

21

6735

919

1185

4362

56

26

10

380

1339

1

846

1091

35

90

4630

LEG

END

: A

AD

T / T

RU

CK

S - 2

020

Com

plet

ed b

y N

R

Not

e: T

raffi

c es

timat

e is

base

d on

fact

ored

201

8 co

unts

.

Inte

rsec

tion

Traf

fic V

olum

es

Nor

th D

akot

a D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

SFN

792

1 (R

ev. 4

-85)

2152

/ 25

7

7826 / 1829

7841 / 1823

2152

/ 25

7 66

1 / 1

19

1091

/ 11

4

184

/ 31

201

/ 35

661

/ 119

6735 / 1715

907 / 83

215 / 35

7865 / 1875

7880 / 1869 6656 / 1696

929 / 125

224 / 48

1185

/ 12

7

970

/ 92

Inte

rsec

tion

No.

1

Des

crip

tion

Hills

boro

Int.

Int

. I-2

9 &

Cal

edon

ia A

ve (C

MC

491

8)

R

ef. P

t. 10

4.15

5

Hou

rs

24

Dat

e

10/1

4/20

20

1367

/ 16

7 1406

/ 21

3

1130

/ 16

0 12

24 /

173

1000

/ 12

5

K

Ram

ps

Cr

ossr

oads

Mai

nlin

e

Exist

ing

Futu

re

Ex

istin

g Fu

ture

Exist

ing

Futu

re

876

1130

1026

13

22

51

59

6656

949

1224

3336

43

04

52

21

6735

919

1185

4362

56

26

10

380

1339

1

846

1091

35

90

4630

LEG

END

: A

AD

T / T

RU

CK

S - 2

040

Com

plet

ed b

y N

R

Not

e: T

raffi

c es

timat

e is

base

d on

fact

ored

201

8 co

unts

.

Not

e: G

row

th ra

te fo

r all

vehi

cles

is 1

.30%

G

row

th ra

te fo

r tru

cks

is

1.30

%.


11



Inte

rsec

tion

Traf

fic V

olum

es

Nor

th D

akot

a D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

SFN

792

1 (R

ev. 4

-85)

259

/ 62

5857 / 1372

5868 / 1367

259

/ 62

1008

/ 13

4

487

/ 67

399

/ 46

563

/ 80

1008

/ 13

4

5370 / 1305

88 / 21

408 / 52

6067 / 1418

6078 / 1413 5370 / 1290

134 / 33

574 / 84

498

/ 77

90 /

25

Inte

rsec

tion

No.

1

Des

crip

tion

M

ayvi

lle In

t.

In

t. I-

29 &

ND

200

R

ef. P

t. 11

0.79

5

Hou

rs

24

Dat

e

11/2

4/20

20

533

/ 75

743

/ 121

697

/ 113

70

8 / 1

23

134

/ 39

K

Ram

ps

Cr

ossr

oads

Mai

nlin

e

Exist

ing

Futu

re

Ex

istin

g Fu

ture

Exist

ing

Futu

re

697

899

20

16

2600

5370

69

28

708

913

51

8 66

8

5370

69

27

498

642

25

34

3268

1074

0 13

855

487

628

2390

30

82

LEG

END

: A

AD

T / T

RU

CK

S - 2

020

Com

plet

ed b

y N

R

Not

e: T

raffi

c es

timat

e is

base

d on

fact

ored

201

8 co

unts

.

Inte

rsec

tion

Traf

fic V

olum

es

Nor

th D

akot

a D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

SFN

792

1 (R

ev. 4

-85)

334

/ 80

7555 / 1770

7570 / 1764

334

/ 80

1300

/ 17

3

628

/ 87

515

/ 60

726

/ 103

1300

/ 17

3

6927 / 1683

113 / 27

526 / 67

7826 / 1829

7841 / 1823 6928 / 1665

173 / 43

740 / 108

642

/ 99

116

/ 32

Inte

rsec

tion

No.

1

Des

crip

tion

M

ayvi

lle In

t.

In

t. I-

29 &

ND

200

R

ef. P

t. 11

0.79

5

Hou

rs

24

Dat

e

11/2

4/20

20

687

/ 97

958

/ 156

899

/ 146

91

3 / 1

58

173

/ 50

K

Ram

ps

Cr

ossr

oads

Mai

nlin

e

Exist

ing

Futu

re

Ex

istin

g Fu

ture

Exist

ing

Futu

re

697

899

20

16

2600

5370

69

28

708

913

51

8 66

8

5370

69

27

498

642

25

34

3268

1074

0 13

855

487

628

2390

30

82

LEG

END

: A

AD

T / T

RU

CK

S - 2

040

Com

plet

ed b

y N

R

Not

e: T

raffi

c es

timat

e is

base

d on

fact

ored

201

8 co

unts

.

Not

e: G

row

th ra

te fo

r all

vehi

cles

is 1

.30%

G

row

th ra

te fo

r tru

cks

is

1.30

%.


12



Total Crashes: 56 (Sorted by Latitude)Location: I-29 Notes:Reference Points:Start - End Date: 9/30/2015 - 10/1/2020 (5 Years)

K A B C O Straight (on level) = 48Angle 0 0 0 0 0 0 Straight (on grade) = 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Rear End 7 1 0 2 1 3 Curve (on level) = 7 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov DecLeft Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Curve (on grade) = 1 0 0Sideswipe (same dir.) 14 0 1 1 1 11 Hill Crest = 0 1 0Sideswipe (opp dir.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unknown = 0 2 1Single Vehicle 35 0 1 7 4 23 56 3 0Ped/Bike 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0Head On 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1Backing 0 0 0 0 0 0 Passenger Car = 28 6 3Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 PU / Van / Utility = 36 7 6

56 1 2 10 6 37 Truck = 11 8 4Bus / Motorhome = 0 9 3

Motorcycle + Moped = 0 10 4K 2% K A B C O Ped or Bike = 0 11 2A 4% Dry 25 1 1 5 2 16 These are only the most popular choices. 12 2B 18% Wet 3 0 0 0 2 1 13 5C 11% Ice / Snow 28 0 1 5 2 20 14 2O 66% Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB = 43 15 5

56 1 2 10 6 37 SB = 32 16 3EB = 0 17 1

WB = 2 18 3K A B C O 19 2

Dawn/Dusk 5 0 0 0 0 5 20 1Daylight 35 1 1 6 4 23 21 2

Yes = 1 Dark 14 0 1 3 2 8 22 3Dark (lighted) 1 0 0 1 0 0 23 3Unknown 1 0 0 0 0 1 Yes (alcohol or drugs present) = 1 Total 6 13 7 9 1 2 3 1 3 1 0 10 56

Attention Distracted = 0 56 1 2 10 6 37 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov DecWeather = 7

Speed = 1Too Fast for Conditions = 23 Motor Vehicle in Transport = 21

Fail to Yield = 0 Animal = 0Improper Backing/Turning = 0 Jackknife = 4 1

*These are only the most popular choices. Ran Off Roadway (not including below crashes) = 18 2Guardrail + Concrete Barrier + Bridge Rail = 2 3

Bridge / Pier / Abutment / Overhead Structure = 1 4Poles / Posts / Trees / Overhead Sign Supports = 1 5

Yes (partially or fully) = 0 6 *This info is not available for all units.

K A B C O

M F Total0 0 05 3 85 6 119 7 16 Monday = 6 Non-Junction = 528 5 13 Tuesday = 13 Intersection + Intersection-Related = 08 2 10 Wednesday = 8 Alley / Driveway Access = 07 3 10 Thursday = 12 Interchange Area + Exit / Entrance Ramp = 04 0 4 Friday = 22 1 3 Saturday = 448 27 Sunday = 11

56

0

Breakdown by SeverityVision Zero Emphasis Areas

B

A

K

C

O

1

0 0 0 00

32%4%2%2%

56

0%13%0%25%0%63%0%0%0%0%

100%

0 0 0 0

0 1 4 3 15

0 0 0 0 8

28000

238

Lane Departure Crashes

Intersection Crashes

Alcohol and/or Drug Related Crashes

Unbelted Vehicle Occupant Crashes

Speed Related Crashes

Young Driver Crashes

0 1 7 3 17

0

9/30/2020 10/1/2020

These are only the most popular choices.

2%

Yr Start Date End Date Intersection (or Alley / Drvwy)

Non-Intersection

9/30/2017 9/29/2018 5 5 10

49/30/2016 9/29/2017 16 7 23

0 35 21 56

0 0%0%

D1 and D2 Contr. Factors*


Relation to Junction

TotalSingle Veh Mult. Veh9/30/2015 9/29/2016 3 1

0%

0% 63% 38%

9/30/2019 9/29/2020 6 5 119/30/2018 9/29/2019

Crash Summary Sheets

Statistics for Total Crashes

11%23%14%

0%0%

0%13%2%

Month

Mili

tary

Tim

e

21%4%

93%

Under Construction

5 3 8

0 0 0

86%

Animal crashes were not included.

38%

Roadway Geometrics

2

10

6

37

Letter Code

No. of Crashes

Fatal

Incapacitating Injury

0%7%

20%7%

Non-incapacitating Injury

Possible Injury

Property Damage Only

Crash Severity Breakdown by SeverityManner of Collision

Lighting Conditions Breakdown by Severity

9%63%25%2%2%

100%

5%50%

101.328-110.933

D1 or D2 Ejected*

D1 and D2 Age/Sex

0-1718-20

Age

21-2425-3435-4445-5455-6465-7475+

V1 and V2 Directions

D1 and D2 Alcohol / Drugs*

First Harmful Event General Summary

Day of Week

V1 and V2 Configuration*

Surface Conditions Breakdown by Severity

45%

0%100%

75

23 USC § 409 DocumentsNDDOT Reserves All Objections

0

2

32

43

Format Version 2/10/2020 Page 1


13



Total Crashes: 56 (Sorted by Latitude)Location: I-29 Notes:Reference Points:Start - End Date: 9/30/2015 - 10/1/2020 (5 Years)

K = 0 Intersection + Intersection-Related = 0A = 0 Alley / Driveway Access = 0B = 0 K = 1 Straight (on level) = 19 Yes (alcohol or drugs) = 0C = 0 A = 1 Straight (on grade) = 0O = 0 B = 3 Curve (on level) = 2

0 Angle = 0 C = 2 Curve (on grade) = 0 Passenger Car = 14Rear End = 0 O = 14 Hill Crest = 0 PU / Van / Utility = 20Left Turn = 0 21 Truck = 6

Sideswipe (same direction) = 0 Bus / Motorhome = 0Dry = 0 Single Vehicle = 0 Yes = 0 Motorcycle + Moped = 0

Wet = 0 Ped / Bike = 0 Dry = 14Ice / Snow = 0 Other = 0 Wet = 0

Other = 0 Ice / Snow = 7 Yes = 0Other = 0

Angle = 0Dawn = 0 Attention Distracted = 0 Dawn = 2 Rear End = 7

Daylight = 0 Weather = 0 Daylight = 18 Left Turn = 0Dusk = 0 Speed = 0 Dusk = 0 Sideswipe (same direction) = 14Dark = 0 Too Fast for Conditions = 0 Dark = 1 Head-On + Sideswipe (opp direction) = 0

Dark (lighted) = 0 Fail to Yield = 0 Dark (lighted) = 0 Other = 0Improper Backing / Turning = 0

Yes = 0K = 0 Straight (on level) = 29 Yes (alcohol or drugs) = 1

Yes (alcohol or drugs) = 0 A = 1 Straight (on grade) = 0B = 7 Curve (on level) = 5C = 4 Curve (on grade) = 1 Passenger Car = 14O = 23 Hill Crest = 0 PU / Van / Utility = 16

Passenger Car = 0 35 Truck = 5PU / Van / Utility = 0 Bus / Motorhome = 0

Truck = 0 Yes = 1 Motorcycle + Moped = 0Bus / Motorhome = 0 Dry = 11

Motorcycle + Moped = 0 Wet = 3Ice / Snow = 21 Yes (partially or fully) = 0

Other = 0

V1 V2 Motor Vehicle in Transport = 0Signal = 0 0 Dawn = 2 Animal = 0

Stop = 0 0 Daylight = 17 Jackknife = 4Beacon = 0 0 Dusk = 1 Ran Off Roadway (not including below crashes) = 18

Dark = 13 Guardrail + Concrete Barrier + Bridge Rail = 2Dark (lighted) = 1 Bridge / Pier / Abutment / Overhead Structure = 1

Poles / Posts / Trees / Overhead Sign Supports = 1

*This info is not available for all units. *This info is not available for all units.

3%3%


6% 0%49% 11%3% 51%

37% 6%3%

These are only the most popular choices. 60% 0%0%

D1 Most Harmful Event*Lighting Conditions 0%

31% These are only the most popular choices.9% D1 Ejected*

Under Construction 0%Surface Conditions 3% 0%

V1 and V2 Unit Config.* 66% 0% 46%14%

20% 14% V1 Unit Config.*11% 3% 40%

D1 and D2 Alcohol / Drugs Present* 0% 83% 3%3% 0%

These are only the most popular choices.Under Construction

#DIV/0! Crash Severity Road Geometrics D1 Alcohol / Drugs Present*

#DIV/0! 5% 0%#DIV/0! 0% 0%

Non-Collision with Motor Vehicle (a.k.a. Single Vehicle) Crashes ONLY

#DIV/0! 86% 0%#DIV/0! 0% 67%

Lighting Conditions Lighting Conditions 0%#DIV/0! 10% 33%

#DIV/0! 33%0%

D1 and D2 Contributing Factors* Manner of Collision

D1 and D2 Alcohol/Drugs Present*

V1 and V2 Unit Config.*

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 67% These are only the most popular choices.#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0% D1 or D2 Ejected*

#DIV/0!Surface Conditions #DIV/0! Under Construction

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! Surface Conditions

Statistics for Intersection-Related Crashes ONLY

Crash Severity Relation to Junction#DIV/0! #DIV/0!



Statistics for Non-Intersection Crashes ONLY

Multiple Vehicle Crashes ONLY

101.328-110.933

0%

#DIV/0! 10% 0%#DIV/0! 67% 0%

#DIV/0! 5% 0%#DIV/0! Manner of Collision 14% 10%

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! Crash Severity Road Geometrics#DIV/0! 5% 90%

V1 and V2 Traffic Control





14



Total Crashes: 56 (Sorted by Latitude)Location: I-29Reference Points:Start - End Date: 9/30/2015 - 10/1/2020 (5 Years)

103265129101.8

① AGE SEX CITY STATE Unit Configuration Movement (traffic control) Contributing Factor1

Most Harmful Event2

① 41F FARGO ND Passenger Car NB Passing To Fast for Conditions

② 64M WEST FARGO ND 2-Axle NB Going Straight Weather

② 30F GRAND FORKS ND Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight

① 20M GRAND FORKS ND Passenger Car NB Going Straight

Name of Intersection


① 19M FARGO ND Passenger Car WB Not on Raodway Careless/Reckless Driving

① 20F MAPLE GROVE MN Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight Other

Type of Collision

Single Veh(Ran Off

Roadway)

PDO04/26/17 WednesdayIce / Snow (Frozen Prcp)Dark 6:14 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junction

Single Veh(Overturn / Rollover)

Single Veh(Fence)

Single Veh(Ran Off

Roadway)

① 26F GRAND FORKS ND Passenger Car NB Going Straight Following too Close

Shortened Narrative① 36F MAYVILLE ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

① 42M ENDERLIN ND Truck Tractor NB Going Straight Weather

① 45M FARGO ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

② 67M FINLEY ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Going Straight Weather

① 40M PELICAN RAPIDS MN Pickup - Van - Utility SB Going Straight

① 21F DEVILS LAKE ND Passenger Car NB Going Straight

101.328-110.933


Sideswipe (Same Dir.)



Rear End

Single Veh(Other Object (Not Fixed))

Non-incapacitating injury03/07/17 TuesdayDry (Severe Wind)Daylight 2:06 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO02/07/16 SundayIce / Snow (Bl Snow)Dark 5:17 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO02/20/17 MondayIce / Snow (Clear)Dark 11:31 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO02/16/17 ThursdayIce / Snow (Clear)Dark 6:20 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO04/26/17 WednesdaySlush (Bl Snow)Daylight 7:40 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO12/25/16 SundayIce / Snow (Cloudy)Daylight 11:15 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPossible Injury03/24/19 SundayDry (Clear)Daylight 4:08 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionNon-incapacitating injury02/28/19 ThursdayDry (Clear)Dark 9:23 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO04/11/17 TuesdayDry (Unkown)Unknown 9:24 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junction

103077329101.85

33806529102.46

102959229102.55

102933829102.66

103279129103.01

102503229103.02

107586829103.07

107394029103.1

103227329103.25

Crash SeverityDate DaySurface Conditions (Weather)Lighting & TimeRoad Geometrics / Relation to Jct

Crash No.HwyRP

LEGENDFatalIncapacitating InjuryNon-Incapacitating InjuryPossible InjuryWet surfaceSnow, Ice, Slush, FrostCrash related to work zone①Unit number

1. Contributing Factor * = alcohol or drugs involved

2. Most Harmful EventFor single vehicle crashes, the most harmful event is shown in parentheses in the "Type of Collision" column




15





Most Harmful Event2Name of

Intersection


Type of Collision

Shortened Narrative

101.328-110.933


Crash No.HwyRP





① 61F BISBEE ND Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight Fail Keep in Proper Lane

① 80M GRAND FORKS ND Passenger Car SB Going Straight Other

① 19M ARGUSVILLE ND Passenger Car WB Going Straight Speed

① 24M ROCHESTER MN Passenger Car NB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

① 21M FARGO ND Unknown Heavy Truck SB Going Straight *

① 28M BUTON MN Passenger Car NB Other Action on Roadway To Fast for Conditions

① 43M STEELE ND Passenger Car SB Going Straight Care Required

① 19F FARGO ND Passenger Car SB Going Straight Fail Keep in Proper Lane

② 47M BOCA RATON FL 3+ Axle SB Going Straight

① 24M GRAND FORKS ND Pickup - Van - Utility NB Negotiating Curve To Fast for Conditions

① 35M GRAND FORKS ND Pickup - Van - Utility NB Slowing/Stopping To Fast for Conditions

Single Veh(Embankment

)

Single Veh(Ran Off

Roadway)

Single Veh(Bridge Rail)

Single Veh(Post)

Single Veh(Post)



Single Veh(Bridge / Pier / Abutment)

Single Veh(Guardrail

End)

Single Veh(Ran Off

Roadway)

Non-incapacitating injury04/03/19 WednesdayDry (Clear)Dark 10:09 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO01/01/20 WednesdayIce / Snow (Cloudy)Daylight 10:30 AMCurve (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO09/03/20 ThursdayDry (Clear)Daylight 3:42 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionNon-incapacitating injury03/21/20 SaturdayIce / Snow (Snow)Dark(L) 10:20 PMCurve (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO06/30/16 ThursdayDry (Clear)Daylight 3:40 PMCurve (on Grade) / Non-junctionPDO12/04/17 MondaySnow (Frozen Prcp)Daylight 9:24 AMStraight (on Level) / RampPossible Injury04/20/17 ThursdayWet (Clear)Daylight 7:52 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPossible Injury10/26/17 ThursdayWet (Frozen Prcp)Dark 7:32 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO12/11/16 SundayIce / Snow (Cloudy)Daylight 1:10 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionNon-incapacitating injury09/23/19 MondayDry (Clear)Daylight 10:35 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junction

107606429103.69

108923529103.89

109849329103.94

1093157

1015109

1045208

103237129104.555

104236529104.725

102379829104.735

108409329104.835



16






Intersection


Type of Collision

Shortened Narrative

101.328-110.933


Crash No.HwyRP





① U Hit and Run NB Going Straight

② 65M GRAND FORKS ND Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight

① 27M GRAND FORKS ND Passenger Car NB Passing To Fast for Conditions

② 44F EAST GRAND FORKS MN Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight Weather

① 47M GRAND FORKS ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Going Straight

① 64M MOORHEAD MN Truck Tractor NB Going Straight Other

① 44M FARGO ND Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight

① 49M GRAND FORKS ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Going Straight Following too Close

② 40F SHELLY MN Passenger Car SB Slowing/Stopping

① 21F FARGO ND Passenger Car SB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

V1 NB moved to left lane and overtook a pickup. After passing V1 moved back into the right lane, lost control, overturned into the east ditch.

① 47M CALGARY AB Pickup - Van - Utility NB Passing To Fast for Conditions

① 67M MINNEAPOLIS MN Truck Tractor NB Other Action on Roadway To Fast for Conditions

① 33F AURORA IL Passenger Car SB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

② 33M BISMARCK ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

③ 29M WINNIPEG MB Truck Tractor SB Going Straight Weather

Single Veh(Post)



Single Veh(Other Object (Not Fixed))


Single Veh(Other Non-

Collision)

Rear End


Single Veh(Jackknife)


PDO12/25/16 SundayIce / Snow (Frozen Prcp)Dusk 4:40 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO04/18/18 WednesdayDry (Clear)Daylight 3:30 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPossible Injury03/25/18 SundayIce / Snow (Snow)Daylight 5:48 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO03/05/19 TuesdayDry (Clear)Dark 6:44 PMStraight (on Level) / Other CossingsNon-incapacitating injury04/23/17 SundaySnow (Snow)Daylight 8:26 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO04/10/18 TuesdayDry (Cloudy)Daylight 9:00 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionNon-incapacitating injury01/15/20 WednesdayDry (Clear)Daylight 1:05 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionIncapacitating Injury02/20/17 MondayIce / Snow (Fog)Dark 10:38 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPossible Injury02/20/17 MondayIce / Snow (Fog)Dark 11:25 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionNon-incapacitating injury12/27/16 TuesdayIce / Snow (Bl Snow)Daylight 12:16 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junction

102473529104.895

105447729105.2

105291929105.51

1075197

103275029106.19

105392029106.43

109009329106.55

102960829106.7

102961829106.7

102544529106.76



17






Intersection


Type of Collision

Shortened Narrative

101.328-110.933


Crash No.HwyRP





① 21M WARREN MN Passenger Car NB Going Straight Over Correct/Steering

V1 SB in right lane at 75 mph. V2 SB in left lane came to an abrupt stop. V1 moved into the left lane to pass another vehicle. V1 struck V2 in the rear end without any braking or maneuvering.

V1 NB in right lane. V2 NB attempted to pass V1. V1 moved into left lane, failing to check blind spot and collided with V2. V2 rolled and came to rest in the east ditch.

① 64F ARTHUR ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Slowing/Stopping Following too Close

① 60M FAIRBAULT MN Pickup - Van - Utility SB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

Fatal07/31/19 WednesdayDry (Clear)Daylight 3:41 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO12/05/17 TuesdayIce / Snow (Clear)Daylight 12:45 PMCurve (on Level) / Non-junctionIncapacitating Injury07/08/18 SundayDry (Cloudy)Daylight 6:08 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO01/14/17 SaturdayDry (Clear)Dark 8:37 PMCurve (on Level) / Non-junction

① 39M WALHALLA ND Unknown Heavy Truck NB Going Straight Fail Keep in Proper Lane Other Non-Collision

② 64M PARK RIVER ND 3+ Axle NB Going Straight

① 51M LANCASTER MN Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

② 50M WINNIPEG MB Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight Weather

① 34M PORTLAND ND Passenger Car NB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions


Rear End

Single Veh(Post)

PDO02/16/17 ThursdayIce / Snow (Clear)Dawn 7:35 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junction

PDO06/13/19 ThursdayDry (Clear)Daylight 6:51 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO02/18/18 SundaySnow (Bl Snow)Daylight 1:03 PMCurve (on Level) / Non-junction

② 76M HILLSBORO ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Driverless (Stopped) Careless/Reckless Driving

① 28F FARGO ND Passenger Car SB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

① 75F THE VILLAGES FL Passenger Car NB Going Straight Fail Keep in Proper Lane

② 24M GRAND FORKS ND Pickup - Van - Utility NB Passing

① 56F GRAND FORKS ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Passing

Rear End

② 23F FARGO ND Passenger Car SB Slowing/Stopping

① 59M WEST FARG ND Pickup - Van - Utility NB Changing Lanes Fail Keep in Proper Lane

② 31F FARGO ND Passenger Car NB Going Straight


Single Veh(Post)



Rear End


PDO02/09/17 ThursdayDry (Clear)Daylight 9:30 AMCurve (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO05/15/18 TuesdayDry (Clear)Daylight 2:55 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO12/19/16 MondayIce / Snow (Bl Snow)Daylight 10:10 AMCurve (on Level) / Non-junction

107965229106.9

105031429107.06

102954829107.06

108196629107.07

104484029107.14

105834829107.64

102690629107.69

102885829107.98

105542229108.02

102441529108.26



18






Intersection


Type of Collision

Shortened Narrative

101.328-110.933


Crash No.HwyRP





① 30M TOLEDO OH Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

① 70M LITTLE FALLS MN Pickup - Van - Utility SB Going Straight Weather

① U Hit and Run NB Going Straight Other Non-Collision

② 22F TWIN VALLEY MN Passenger Car NB Going Straight

① 26M WEST FARGO ND 2-Axle SB Going Straight Fail Keep in Proper Lane

② 22F GRAND FORKS ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Passing

① 28F MINNEAPOLIS MN Pickup - Van - Utility NB Other Action on Roadway To Fast for Conditions

① 18F THOMSON ND Passenger Car NB Going Straight Fail Keep in Proper Lane

① 39M HILLSBORO ND Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight

① 32M WEST FARGO ND Passenger Car SB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

② 27M GRAND FORKS ND Passenger Car SB Going Straight Weather

① 39F HENDERSONVILLE SC Pickup - Van - Utility SB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

① 18M HILLSBORO ND Passenger Car NB Passing To Fast for Conditions

② 45F BROOKLYN PARK MN Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight










Rear End

PDO02/16/17 ThursdayIce / Snow (Clear)Dawn 7:53 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO12/27/16 TuesdayIce / Snow (Bl Snow)Daylight 4:05 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionNon-incapacitating injury01/21/20 TuesdayIce / Snow (Bl Snow)Dark 7:34 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionNon-incapacitating injury03/25/18 SundaySnow (Clear)Daylight 11:24 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO02/16/17 ThursdayIce / Snow (Cloudy)Dawn 7:05 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO02/20/16 SaturdayDry (Cloudy)Daylight 3:42 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO02/16/17 ThursdayIce / Snow (Cloudy)Daylight 8:20 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO12/28/19 SaturdaySnow (Snow)Daylight 1:20 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO04/06/16 WednesdayDry (Cloudy)Dawn 6:48 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO12/13/19 FridayDry (Cloudy)Daylight 10:42 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junction

102934429108.26

102545229108.3

109082429108.37

105315929108.41

102933729108.49

100816229108.69

102952629109.03

108928729109.39

101037229109.82

108846529109.86



19






Intersection


Type of Collision

Shortened Narrative

101.328-110.933


Crash No.HwyRP





① 22F PERHAM MN Passenger Car NB Going Straight Careless/Reckless Driving

① 29M FARGO ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Passing Fail Keep in Proper Lane

② 62M HILLSBORO ND Pickup - Van - Utility SB Going Straight

① 31F CUMMINGS ND Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight Following too Close

② 43M FARGO ND Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight

① 19M GENOLA UT Pickup - Van - Utility NB Going Straight To Fast for Conditions

① 57M WINNIPEG MB 3+ Axle SB Going Straight Care Required

① 48F SHARON ND Passenger Car SB Changing Lanes Careless/Reckless Driving

② 52M EMERSON MB Truck Tractor SB Going Straight

PDO01/17/17 TuesdayDry (Clear)Daylight 8:37 AMStraight (on Level) / RampPDO09/29/19 SundayWet (Rain)Dark 11:24 PMStraight (on Level) / Ramp


Rear End




Single Veh(Post)

PDO07/14/20 TuesdayDry (Clear)Daylight 1:20 PMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPossible Injury08/07/20 FridayDry (Cloudy)Daylight 7:33 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO01/14/20 TuesdayIce / Snow (Bl Snow)Daylight 8:27 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junctionPDO03/31/20 TuesdayDry (Clear)Dark 2:45 AMStraight (on Level) / Non-junction

109675029110.04

109722329110.25

108983629110.36

109360229110.5

102763329110.57

108436529110.915



20



Total Crashes: 1 (Sorted by Date)City: HillsboroLocation: I-29 Exit 104Start - End Date: 10/1/2015 - 9/30/2020 (5 Years)

① 39M MOORHEAD MN Pickup - Van - Utility NB Slowing/Stopping (Stop) To Fast for Conditions


Most Harmful Event2 Shortened Narrative Diagram

Type of Collision

PDO11/23/15 MondayIce / Snow (Clear)Dawn 7:30 AM

Single Veh(Post)

Intersection and/or Urban Crash Summary Sheets

V1 NB braking but lost traction on slippery roadway. V1 lost control of the vehicle and struck the stop sign. x

↑

335990

Crash SeverityDate DaySurface Conditions (Weather)Lighting & Time

Crash No.







21



Total Crashes: 2 (Sorted by Date)City: 0 Notes:Location: I-29 Exit 111Start - End Date: 10/1/2015 - 9/30/2020 (5 Years)

K A B C O Passenger Car = 2Angle 1 0 0 1 0 0 PU / Van / Utility = 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Rear End 0 0 0 0 0 0 Truck = 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov DecLeft Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bus / Motorhome = 0 0 0Sideswipe (same dir.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Motorcycle + Moped = 0 1 0Sideswipe (opp dir.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped or Bike = 0 2 0Single Vehicle 1 0 0 0 0 1 These are only the most popular choices. 3 0Ped/Bike 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0Head On 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0Backing 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB = 0 6 0Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB = 2 7 0

2 0 0 1 0 1 EB = 1 8 0WB = 0 9 1

10 0K 0% K A B C O 11 0A 0% Dry 1 0 0 1 0 0 12 0B 50% Wet 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0C 0% Ice / Snow 1 0 0 0 0 1 14 0O 50% Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes (alcohol or drugs present) = 0 15 1

2 0 0 1 0 1 16 017 0

M F 18 0Yes = 0 K A B C O 0 0 19 0

Dawn/Dusk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0Daylight 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 21 0

Monday = 1 Dark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 22 0Tuesday = 0 Dark (lighted) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 23 0

Wednesday = 0 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2Thursday = 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

Friday = 0 0 0Saturday = 0 1 0

Sunday = 0 2 12

*Within the Manner of Collision table, values equal to zero are not shown in order to reduce clutter.

NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB

D1 and D2 Alcohol / Drugs*

D1 and D2 Age/SexAge

000

Total

110001

45-5455-6465-7475+

3

0

Property Damage Only O 1

0%0%

50%0%0%0%

50%Day of Week

C


0-1718-2021-2425-34

MonthManner of Collision Breakdown by Severity

50%0%0%0%0%50%0%0%0%0%

Surface Conditions Breakdown by Severity

Lighting Conditions Breakdown by Severity

V1 and V2 Configuration*

V1 and V2 Directions

1 2

09/30/2020

Rear End Left Turn Sideswipe Same Dir.

1

Ped / Bike

Single Veh.

9/30/2019 19/30/2018

9/30/2016 0

50% Mili

tary

Tim

e

0%0%

1

0%0%0%0%0%0%0%

0%0%0%

0%0%0%0%0%0%0%

01

100%

NB+EB NB+WB SB+EB SB+WBSubTotal

SubTotal

NB to WB SB to EB EB to NB WB to SB

SubTotal

0%

100%

Backing Head on or Other

0%0%50%0%

0%50%

50%

2

35-44


0%100%

Under Construction

0%

Statistics

Crash Severity Letter Code

No. of Crashes

Fatal K 0

Incapacitating Injury A 0

Non-incapacitating Injury B 1

Possible Injury

Manner of Collision

Start Date End Date

Angle

Year

1

SubTotal

100%

10/1/2015

0%

9/30/2017

0%

10/1/201910/1/201810/1/2017

1

2345

111/30/2024

10/1/2016

0%

Total

1

1

0

2

0




22



Total Crashes: 2 (Sorted by Date)City: 0Location: I-29 Exit 111Start - End Date: 10/1/2015 - 9/30/2020 (5 Years)




Crash SeverityDate DaySurface Conditions (Weather)Lighting & Time

Crash No.

1032729

1082785

↓→

↓x


② 78M WARREN MN Passenger Car SB Turning Left (Stop) Failed to Yield

PDO04/27/17 ThursdaySlush (Cloudy)Daylight 9:00 AM

Single Veh(Post)

Non-incapacitating injury08/19/19 MondayDry (Clear)Daylight 3:41 PM

Angle

Type of Collision

① 29F GRAND FORKS ND Passenger Car SB Slowing/Stopping (Stop) To Fast for Conditions

① 36M HALSTAD MN Pickup - Van - Utility EB Going Straight


Most Harmful Event2 Shortened Narrative Diagram




23



HCS7 Basic Freeway ReportProject InformationAnalyst DMS Date 11/23/2020Agency NDDOT Analysis Year 2020Jurisdiction Time Period Analyzed PeakProject Description I-29 NB PCN 23102, 23103 Unit United States Customary

Geometric DataNumber of Lanes, ln 2 Terrain Type LevelSegment Length (L), ft - Percent Grade, % -Measured or Base Free-Flow Speed Base Grade Length, mi -Base Free-Flow Speed (BFFS), mi/h 75.4 Total Ramp Density (TRD), ramps/mi 0.21Lane Width, ft 12 Free-Flow Speed (FFS), mi/h 74.5Right-Side Lateral Clearance, ft 10

Adjustment FactorsDriver Population Mostly Familiar Final Speed Adjustment Factor (SAF) 0.975Weather Type Non-Severe Weather Final Capacity Adjustment Factor (CAF) 0.968Incident Type No Incident Demand Adjustment Factor (DAF) 1.000

Demand and CapacityDemand Volume veh/h 600 Heavy Vehicle Adjustment Factor (fHV) 0.811Peak Hour Factor 0.94 Flow Rate (Vp), pc/h/ln 394Total Trucks, % 23.30 Capacity (c), pc/h/ln 2400Single-Unit Trucks (SUT), % - Adjusted Capacity (cadj), pc/h/ln 2323Tractor-Trailers (TT), % - Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (v/c) 0.17Passenger Car Equivalent (ET) 2.000

Speed and DensityLane Width Adjustment (fLW) 0.0 Average Speed (S), mi/h 72.7Right-Side Lateral Clearance Adj. (fRLC) 0.0 Density (D), pc/mi/ln 5.4Total Ramp Density Adjustment 0.9 Level of Service (LOS) AAdjusted Free-Flow Speed (FFSadj), mi/h 72.7

Copyright © 2020 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™ Freeways Version 7.8.5 Generated: 12/01/2020 13:07:32NB_I-29.xuf


24



HCS7 Basic Freeway ReportProject InformationAnalyst DMS Date 11/23/2020Agency NDDOT Analysis Year 2020Jurisdiction Time Period Analyzed PeakProject Description I-29 SB PCN 23102, 23103 Unit United States Customary





Copyright © 2020 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™ Freeways Version 7.8.5 Generated: 12/01/2020 14:46:07SB_I-29.xuf


25



HCS7 Basic Freeway ReportProject InformationAnalyst DMS Date 11/23/2020Agency NDDOT Analysis Year 2040Jurisdiction Time Period Analyzed PeakProject Description I-29 NB PCN 23102, 23103 Unit United States Customary





Copyright © 2020 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™ Freeways Version 7.8.5 Generated: 12/01/2020 14:42:52NB_2040_I-29.xuf


26



HCS7 Basic Freeway ReportProject InformationAnalyst DMS Date 11/23/2020Agency NDDOT Analysis Year 2040Jurisdiction Time Period Analyzed PeakProject Description I-29 SB PCN 23102, 23103 Unit United States Customary





Copyright © 2020 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™ Freeways Version 7.8.5 Generated: 12/01/2020 15:12:46SB_2040_I-29.xuf


27



HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control ReportGeneral Information Site Information

Analyst DMS Intersection #1 West RampAgency/Co. NDDOT JurisdictionDate Performed 11/4/2020 East/West Street Trail County 11Analysis Year 2020 North/South Street West RampTime Analyzed Peak Hour Factor 0.92Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25Project Description

Lanes

Major Street: East-West

Vehicle Volumes and AdjustmentsApproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound SouthboundMovement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T RPriority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0Configuration TR LT LTRVolume (veh/h) 36 16 72 37 70 0 14Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 13 9 0 17Proportion Time BlockedPercent Grade (%) 0Right Turn ChannelizedMedian Type | Storage Undivided

Critical and Follow-up HeadwaysBase Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2Critical Headway (sec) 4.23 7.19 6.50 6.37Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3Follow-Up Headway (sec) 2.32 3.58 4.00 3.45

Delay, Queue Length, and Level of ServiceFlow Rate, v (veh/h) 78 91Capacity, c (veh/h) 1481 705v/c Ratio 0.05 0.1395% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 0.2 0.4Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 10.9Level of Service (LOS) A BApproach Delay (s/veh) 5.1 10.9Approach LOS B

Copyright © 2020 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™ TWSC Version 7.8.5 Generated: 11/5/2020 9:38:55 AM1_TWSC2020.xtw


28




Analyst DMS Intersection #1 West RampAgency/Co. NDDOT JurisdictionDate Performed 11/4/2020 East/West Street Trail County 11Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street West RampTime Analyzed Peak Hour Factor 0.92Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25Project Description

Lanes





Copyright © 2020 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™ TWSC Version 7.8.5 Generated: 11/5/2020 10:51:02 AM1_TWSC2040.xtw


29




Analyst DMS Intersection #2 East RampAgency/Co. NDDOT JurisdictionDate Performed 11/4/2020 East/West Street Trail County 11Analysis Year 2020 North/South Street East RampTime Analyzed Peak Hour Factor 0.92Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25Project Description

Lanes


Vehicle Volumes and AdjustmentsApproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound SouthboundMovement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T RPriority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0Configuration LT T R LRVolume (veh/h) 17 89 92 75 17 78Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 16 21 13Proportion Time BlockedPercent Grade (%) 0Right Turn Channelized YesMedian Type | Storage Undivided

Critical and Follow-up HeadwaysBase Critical Headway (sec) 4.1 7.1 6.2Critical Headway (sec) 4.26 7.31 6.33Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3Follow-Up Headway (sec) 2.34 3.69 3.42

Delay, Queue Length, and Level of ServiceFlow Rate, v (veh/h) 18 103Capacity, c (veh/h) 1409 859v/c Ratio 0.01 0.1295% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 0.0 0.4Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 9.8Level of Service (LOS) A AApproach Delay (s/veh) 1.3 9.8Approach LOS A

Copyright © 2020 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™ TWSC Version 7.8.5 Generated: 11/5/2020 12:47:56 PM2_TWSC2020.xtw


30




Analyst DMS Intersection #2 East RampAgency/Co. NDDOT JurisdictionDate Performed 11/4/2020 East/West Street Trail County 11Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street East RampTime Analyzed Peak Hour Factor 0.92Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25Project Description

Lanes


Vehicle Volumes and AdjustmentsApproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound SouthboundMovement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T RPriority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0Configuration LT T R LRVolume (veh/h) 22 116 119 97 23 100Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 16 21 13Proportion Time BlockedPercent Grade (%) 0Right Turn Channelized YesMedian Type | Storage Undivided





31




Analyst DMS Intersection #3 West RampAgency/Co. NDDOT JurisdictionDate Performed 11/30/2020 East/West Street ND 200Analysis Year 2020 North/South Street West RampTime Analyzed Peak Hour Factor 0.92Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25Project Description

Lanes







32




Analyst DMS Intersection #3 West RampAgency/Co. NDDOT JurisdictionDate Performed 11/30/2020 East/West Street ND 200Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street West RampTime Analyzed Peak Hour Factor 0.92Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25Project Description

Lanes







33




Analyst DMS Intersection #4 East RampAgency/Co. NDDOT JurisdictionDate Performed 11/30/2020 East/West Street ND 200Analysis Year 2020 North/South Street East RampTime Analyzed Peak Hour Factor 0.92Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25Project Description

Lanes


Vehicle Volumes and AdjustmentsApproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound SouthboundMovement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T RPriority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0Configuration LT TR LRVolume (veh/h) 53 16 22 12 74 17Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 28 15 29Proportion Time BlockedPercent Grade (%) 0Right Turn ChannelizedMedian Type | Storage Undivided





34




Analyst DMS Intersection #4 East RampAgency/Co. NDDOT JurisdictionDate Performed 11/30/2020 East/West Street ND 200Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street East RampTime Analyzed Peak Hour Factor 0.92Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25Project Description

Lanes


Vehicle Volumes and AdjustmentsApproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound SouthboundMovement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T RPriority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0Configuration LT TR LRVolume (veh/h) 68 21 28 15 96 22Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 13 15 29Proportion Time BlockedPercent Grade (%) 0Right Turn ChannelizedMedian Type | Storage Undivided





35

