tracking team introduction what has been done what still needs to be done
TRANSCRIPT
Tracking Team
started at the Global Level Processing meeting (15-16/05/2003 in Legnaro)Web site: http://www-csnsm.in2p3.fr/groupes/strucnuc/trackteam.htmlMembers:
France: Strasbourg, Orsay Italy: Legnaro, Padova, Milano Poland: Krakow Roumania: Bucharest Sweden: Stockholm, Uppsala UK: York
Team leader: A. Lopez-Martens
Aim of tracking- Read for each event the list of deposited energies and positions of all the interactions points in AGATA
e1, x1, y1,,z1
e2, x2, y2,z2
………………….. en, xn, yn,zn
- Disentangle the interaction points i.e reconstruct individual photon trajectories and write out photon energies, incident and scattering directions
E1, ()inc,1,()sc,1
E2, ()inc,2,()sc,2
………………………………Ei, ()inc,i,()sc,i
Doppler correction
Polarization measurement
Optimization: ph x P/T
Physical Processes in Ge for photons
Compton
(10 keV) ~ 55 m (100 keV) ~ 0.3 cm (200 keV) ~ 1.1 cm(500 keV) ~ 2.3 cm (1 MeV) ~ 3.3 cm
Photon range(E) = MA/(Nav.) . 1/E
1
2
3source
1
2
e1
e2
e3
Property of Compton Scattering
E0
cos(i) = 1 – mec2 (1/Ei – 1/Ei-1))
incident energy at i
scattered energy at i = Ei-1)-ei
assuming that the e- is at rest, from conservation of energy & momentum:
E1E2
0
Electron momentum profile => change in scattering direction!
Some complications……
! Interaction position position of energy deposition
e-
scinc
!
Interaction of neutrons or other particles => adds totally uncorrelated interaction points
ion/Brem ~ Ee- (MeV) /21.8
!
Rayleigh scattering => change in incident direction
Additional Complications …
From PSA: uncertainty in position of interaction
xx
position resolution
From preamp:energy threshold
xx
xx
x
From preprocessing:energy resolution x True interactions
What comes out of PSA
Events of interest : total E absorption
Series of Compton scatters+ photoelectric interaction(which might be so close that PSA thinks it’s 1 single interaction point !)
Single photoelectric interaction
Pair production +Compton interactions +Photoelectric interactions
Existing Algorithmsor Algorithms currently being developed
- Clusterisation + forward trackingG. Schmid et al., NIM A 430 (1999) 69D. Bazzacco, mgt* codeA. Lopez-Martens et al., NIM A 533 (2004) 454
- Back-tracking algorithmJ. Van der Marel and B. Cederwall, NIMA 437 (1999) 538L. Milechina and B. Cederwall, NIMA 508 (2003) 394A. Lopez-Martens et al., NIM A 533 (2004) 454
- Clusterisation + Probabilistic methodI. Piqueras et al., NIMA 516 (2004) 122
A. 1st hit identification with Fuzzy Logic and/or fuzzy cluster creation C. Rossi AlvarezD. Bucurescu (see corresponding talk)
What’s been decided/done
Systematically use secondary particle tracking for simulations (default option in the Agata code) + 5mm packing distance
Tracked gammas in the full 180/120/… configurations with all dead materials, capsules, cryostats,… and compared their performance (http://agata.pd.infn.it/documents/simulations/comparison.html)
Compared different algorithms with same simulated data (A. Lopez-Martens et al., NIM A 533 (2004) 454) Started combining the good features of different algorithms
Started tracking neutrons (see J. Ljungvall’s talk)
Started checking background suppression capacities of algorithms (see E. Farnea’s talk)
Pair production event tracking (anything new ?)
Single interaction points (anything better than what we have now ?)
Improve background suppression of algorithms
Take into account ancillary information (?)
Use « real » position uncertainties within a detector
Compute « real » effective distances in Ge (not assuming a 4 Ge shell)…….now done ?
Produce data (what format ?) for data analysis
Optimize tracking codes for speed
Online implementation
What needs to be done